The system of modular charges for the "Coalition"

The Chief Rocket and Artillery Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation presented information on the Army 2017 system of modular missile charges created as part of the development of a set of main-use shots for the promising interspecific Coalition 152-mm artillery complex, reports bmpd.

The 152-mm shot with the concrete-concrete projectile 3-XXNX, created within the framework of the same OCD, was also presented. It is designed to defeat field fortifications and other fortifications, infrastructure and rear.

According to the developers, the shot consists of the 3Г4 projectile, a ground fuse, a full variable modular propellant 4-З-27, an electric shock tube TV-UED-3 (3КВХNUMX).

Description:

“The shot consists of a projectile 3Г4 with a screwed-in bottom fuse, a full variable modular propellant charge 4-З-27 and an electric shock tube. Before screwing in the fuse, the point is closed with a blank stopper.

The 3Г4 projectile consists of a body with a floating copper lead ring, a ballistic tip, a bursting charge, a screw bottom and a threaded ring.

The body of the projectile steel, with a solid head. The ballistic tip is fixed to the body by means of a thread. In the bottom part of the body there is a chamber in which the explosive charge is placed. The explosive charge is closed by a screw bottom, over which a threaded ring is screwed. A lead gasket is inserted between the screw bottom and the casing to protect the explosive charge from the effects of powder gases.

The bottom fuse is screwed into the screw point of the screw bottom. A lead gasket is also inserted between the fuse flange and the screw bottom. ”

152-mm concrete shell 3Г4, created in the framework of the ROC "Coalition-BP"

Comments

[Captain Pushkin]

Well, and how much he will break concrete in caliber 152mm? Why not perform it in a cumulative fragmentation performance? It would be more powerful and more universal.

[dvina71]

Quote: Captain Pushkin

Why not perform it in a cumulative fragmentation performance?

Ie do you think that the only shell in caliber 152mm for Russian self-propelled guns?

[Shurik70]

Quote: dvina71

Ie do you think that the only shell in caliber 152mm for Russian self-propelled guns?

Actually it was. In 1941, it suddenly became clear that the production of armor-piercing shells was not deployed to the 3-inch cannon. As a result, the People's Commissar Vannikov went to the logging site.
I hope this will not happen now. There will be armor / concrete combat, and fragmentation, and high-explosive in abundance. And also special ammunition - reactive-controlled, atomic, and carriers of reconnaissance UAVs will not be forgotten.
You can come up with new ones. For example, for mining, it explodes at a height and scatters hundreds of “petal” mines over the enemy’s base. Or an electronic jammer quickly brings to the right place. When self-propelled spider mines are created, they can also be delivered by large-caliber shells. Well, scattering a network of radio points to listen to the ether, positioning on the ground - this is by itself.

[sedoj]

Quote: Shurik70

For example, for mining, it explodes at a height and scatters hundreds of “petal” mines over the enemy’s base.

For this there is a system "Hurricane". She has:

9M27KZ shell with a cluster warhead equipped with 312 anti-personnel mines.

[Shurik70]

Quote: sedoj

9M27KZ shell with a cluster warhead equipped with 312 anti-personnel mines.

In-in, the same thing. It would be necessary for a howitzer.
It may turn out that a shell for a howitzer will be cheaper than a rocket longer than five meters. And the ammunition of the same "Acacia" - 46 shells. When, slowly, you need to "sow" a line of trenches with mines, for example, the gun is better.
But if you need to plant a field with mines in one gulp, then yes, “Hurricane” is better.

[x.andvlad]

Quote: Captain Pushkin

Well, and how much he will break concrete in caliber 152mm?

For a concrete projectile, the task is not only to break through, but also to destroy. It is for this that it is equipped with a non-cumulative charge and an explosive one.

[igordok]

Quote: x.andvlad

For a concrete projectile, the task is not only to break through, but also to destroy. It is for this that it is equipped with a non-cumulative charge and an explosive one.

Quite right, the task of the concrete-piercing shell is not to make a small hole, but to turn the wall.
Bunkers of the Second World War, protection class m-1 and M-2, had to withstand single hits of 152mm shells, but now the M-3 was unable to withstand a single hit of 152mm shells.

[Lopatov]

Quote: Captain Pushkin

Why not perform it in a cumulative fragmentation performance?

What's the point???
This is an SPG, not a tank. 8)))
The main projectile is HE with various kinds of fuses. Cumulative will be required. For self defense. Purely cumulative.

As for the concrete, it is also half-armor-piercing, apparently, needed. You never know, suddenly the enemy bunkers will build.

[Berkut24]

The bottom fuse is screwed into the screw point of the screw bottom

Although I have an engineering specialty, I have not heard such a thing yet.

[Blue fox]

These are the definitions, and for a long time. :))
Here is our projectile about 150 meters from the western bunker of the bunker Millionaire on the Mannerheim Line.
Screwed bottom and screwed bottom fuse.

[Glory1974]

screw bottom screw point

hearing too (and the eye) too. Earlier, such a phrase was considered a bad manners.
Is it not possible to say a "threaded screw hole"?

[warriordima]

Quote: Berkut24

The bottom fuse is screwed into the screw point of the screw bottom

Although I have an engineering specialty, I have not heard such a thing yet.

This is a hint of adversary, they say for every tricky point, there is a bottom fuse.))

[Grach-25sm]

Yes, I would screw in all of these “partners” something Large-Caliber!

[karelia molot]

Take care of your threaded point, potential!

[sapporo1959]

Well, in the light of new European values, saving a point is no longer fashionable.

[Grach-25sm]

And there will be tactical nuclear charges? .. For "our Baltic, Polish, and most importantly - Western Ukrainian partners" ?!

[pafegosoff]

152 mm in principle - developed.

[pafegosoff]

Great thing! And by the way: the difference of propelling charges allows you to send three shells along different trajectories that stick at the same time at the same time. Here you have integrated 300 mm caliber instead of 152! And then, why bunkers? And basements, ceilings, walls of civil structures, turned into fortifications ...