When creating the submarine "Husky" will apply a fundamentally new solutions

44
During the construction of the submarine "Husky" will be implemented fundamentally new technical solutions, reports TASS message from the Vice-President of the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) Igor Ponomarev.



When creating a strategic submarine of the fifth generation, fundamentally new technical solutions will be implemented. Now, taking into account their characteristics, the shape of the ship is determined,
said Ponomarev.

He noted that the USC enterprises "started the modernization of production facilities for the construction of such submarines."

The deputy head of the company recalled that an advance project of a non-nuclear fifth-generation submarine of the Kalina project had already been created.

The development of the technical project of the submarine. Now the coordination of the assignment for the development of a non-nuclear submarine technical project continues,
he said.

Earlier in the corporation reported that "the formation of the appearance and the creation of a preliminary sketch of a promising nuclear submarine (APL) of the fifth generation" Husky "will be completed within two years." Development leads St. Petersburg CB "Malachite". The Rubin Central Design Bureau is working on the Kalina project.
  • https://www.youtube.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    August 24 2017
    Oh, these exhibitions, everyone strives to promise. . . There was enough mind, even though no deadlines ...
    1. +1
      August 24 2017
      This has never happened, and here it is again. hi
  2. +1
    August 24 2017
    A beautiful thing in the picture. But I think that this is not a "Husky". It would be a secret object. Someone will demonstrate body contours.
    1. 0
      August 24 2017
      Of course not. Draft works are not yet mapped. There is no specific look yet. If he is, but at a closed show. There is the most interesting. And everything else is the same every year at the exhibitions show
      1. jjj
        0
        August 24 2017
        There the question is how to put together tons of displacement to accommodate kilotons. Strategic missiles are not getting smaller
        1. 0
          August 25 2017
          Yes, it seems it will be a multi-purpose boat and not a strategic one.
  3. 0
    August 24 2017
    I wonder what in this submarine will be fundamentally new?
    1. +13
      August 24 2017
      Quote: vazxnumx
      I wonder what in this submarine will be fundamentally new?

      These are the spies who are completely lazy!
    2. +2
      August 24 2017
      Unification between strategic and strike nuclear submarines.
      Allegedly, only the rocket compartments will be different. hi
    3. +8
      August 24 2017
      Quote: vazxnumx
      I wonder what in this submarine will be fundamentally new?

      Metal coolant reactor. Robots launched from the side and carrying patrols at the distance of r \ a connection. Full electric movement, or maybe electric motors in ring tunnels already taken out by the PC ...
      The filling is new. HAK with conformal and long antennas, as well as large-area antennas. Well, the LF saddles. Maybe the depth of immersion up to 1000m will increase. The new anti-hydroacoustic coating of the body instead of "Lightning-2" will be ...
      Weapons will change, there will be more automation. VSK will be self-propelled and with the ability to evacuate the crew from the maximum depth ...
      Well and further on the list of Wishlist! wassat
      1. +1
        August 24 2017
        first of all, the possibility of safe evacuation, if it weren’t like with Kursk
        1. +1
          August 24 2017
          Quote: vazxnumx
          First of all, the possibility of safe evacuation,

          First of all, operational safety and RHBZ protection. Unsinkability and long ears with hands! The system of noise suppression and g / a stealth, the absence of "all" physical fields, up to the torsion (science fiction!) bully
      2. 0
        August 24 2017
        KAA, but VSK is already equipped (finalized) with a "reverse parachute", it seems impossible to rub something into it.
  4. +8
    August 24 2017
    At first, configure Ashenes with Zircons and not Onyxes. 20. Then you can confidently talk about the fifth generation. I don’t want to upset the people, but still I remind you that in essence we do not have multipurpose boats of 4 generations in service. One Severodvinsk bookmark 93rd, and the development is already distant from 77 to 87 years, it is difficult to call a new generation. A full fourth generation is the Kazan boat from the 885M series, which is only undergoing factory tests. So it’s too early for us to dream about Husky so far, it’s not clear what the exploitation of Ashens will show. And it will take about ten years, or even more. Maybe, based on the results of their operation and use of weapons, scientists will come to completely new conclusions and even newer and more unique ships will be waiting for us. good
    1. +9
      August 24 2017
      Quote: RASKAT
      First, Ashtrays with Zircons and not Onyxes set up pieces 20. Then already ...

      Doctor give me pills for greed ... yes more !!!
      “Then already” you will find something else to grab onto and mumble that everything is gone and we are lagging behind. But it’s worth a little overdoing and rises that there are no sausages in stores and there is nothing to eat. Well, we remember the consequences - the vast areas of Russian land are called independent states.
      So, you need to be calmer. Judiciousness does not hurt.
      It is important to understand that there is a peaceful sky above your head. And thanks for that to all those who have dedicated their lives to defense.
      And to teach all the best.
      1. +5
        August 24 2017
        I give you constructive criticism, are you some kind of nonsense to me?
        What makes up the number of multi-purpose boats? Yes, in many ways from among our strategists, and the enemy’s ACG. Here is the approximate number of 20 Ashes. What are the plans for the modernization and development of new models of equipment, only from the operation of previous samples. And where does it come from if the 885 from the 885M differs radically, and the 885M still doesn’t swim a single one? This is a dear fellow profanity. fool
        1. +1
          August 25 2017
          Let me remind you a bit, but the Minister of Defense does not have a beard, so he can’t fuck the military budget, and these boats cost money, and considerable. And the budget, for that and the budget, is balanced. And if money comes to your 20 boats, then it will also disappear from somewhere. What will we cut down on the smartest, health, science, roads, public sector salaries?
    2. +1
      August 24 2017
      Quote: RASKAT
      First, Ash with Zircons and not Onyx, configure 20 pieces.

      Pieces 20 ???? laughing
    3. +2
      August 24 2017
      Ash - not yesterday's development. It is widely known that there was a long-term failure in construction.
      Cost of ownership is an extremely important parameter. Otherwise, ships in need of repair will again stand at the pier, and there will be nothing to go to sea. To save money, even the Americans, with their printing press, cut a lot of fairly new, nuclear ships under Clinton.
      And we have the resources - you yourself understand ... The price of error is an incapable fleet. hi
    4. 0
      August 25 2017
      Quote: RASKAT
      First, Ash with Zircons and not Onyx, configure 20 pieces.

      They only need eight, why twenty?
  5. +4
    August 24 2017
    Quote: RASKAT
    First, Ash with Zircons and not Onyx, configure 20 pieces.

    Sorry, why do we need so much request
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +4
        August 24 2017
        And yet, at whose expense is the banquet? Where did you get the money for such an armada?
    2. mvg
      +2
      August 24 2017
      Why do Americans need 60 Angels and Virgins? Plus 3 wolves. At least some parity.
      1. +4
        August 24 2017
        Compare military budgets and forget about parity. hi
        Only unacceptable damage can be expected.
        1. mvg
          0
          August 24 2017
          Well, in comparison with the surface component, our submarines are at least something. At times, but not dozens of times. Compare budgets for submarine forces can be quite comparable. This is not the Air Force and Navy (surface).
          1. +4
            August 24 2017
            We yield three or four times - it doesn’t really matter.
            Multipurpose nuclear submarines in the US build 2 each. in year. With us, you yourself understand.
            With technical specifications, it’s even worse. They have everything new compared to our Pikes and Barracudas.
            And we don’t need to catch them. Unacceptable damage is our criterion. hi
            1. 0
              August 25 2017
              Quote: Alex777
              With technical specifications, it’s even worse.

              We have "Anteys" and "ash" are being built, there is simply nothing like that of Americans.
        2. 0
          August 24 2017
          Well, the US military budget is a tricky thing.
        3. 0
          August 25 2017
          Quote: Alex777
          Only unacceptable damage can be expected.

          Well, in this case, probably "Losharik" come in handy!
    3. +3
      August 24 2017
      -------------------
      Schaub Bulo am
      ------------------
    4. 0
      August 26 2017
      Well, look, at the moment we have about 11pcs 971 Pike and 8pcs 949 Antey. Yes, the new Ash is universal, and can combine the capabilities of both of these boats. But you yourself consider one boat to cover for each of our strategists, and there are always 4 boats in the sea (these are on both fleets, two), someone else needs to graze enemy strategists and drive, so that they don’t swim with fat laughing, this is at least one boat from each fleet. One more boat on the AUG of the Americans, at least on the Pacific, Mediterranean and Atlantic, to monitor them. These are three more boats, plus a boat from the fleets, which will inevitably become repaired after some time. There is a reserve for a couple of boats, so that the crews rest in case of force majeure. Here you have 15 boats. It's minimum.
  6. 0
    August 24 2017
    They still have not decided on the sketches, and some ranks are already climbing with the deadlines .......
  7. 0
    August 24 2017
    Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
    Metal coolant reactor. Robots launched from the side and carrying patrols at the distance of r \ a connection. Full electric movement, or maybe electric motors in ring tunnels already taken out by the PC ...
    The filling is new. HAK with conformal and long antennas, as well as large-area antennas. Well, the LF saddles. Maybe the depth of immersion up to 1000m will increase. The new anti-hydroacoustic coating of the body instead of "Lightning-2" will be ...
    Weapons will change, there will be more automation. VSK will be self-propelled and with the ability to evacuate the crew from the maximum depth ...

    Is this brand new? :about)))
    Helium-3, ultra-low temperatures, neutrino communication, crew - only instrument technicians
  8. +1
    August 24 2017
    Beautiful picture, futuristic.
    But something tells me that if such a licked shape would have advantages over the classical one, then the boats would have been built like that for a long time :)
    1. The comment was deleted.
  9. 0
    August 24 2017
    a good option
  10. +2
    August 24 2017
    And there is also Lapis lazuli, I wonder what he does?
    1. The comment was deleted.
  11. 0
    August 24 2017
    It should be a horizontal ellipse.
  12. 0
    August 24 2017
    Our Central Design Bureau does not need to learn how to use the loot! The experience is gigantic - there is no runoff of submarine projects all over the world! Give them free rein, they will draw new Husks every two years ... The point is the availability of technology, not funny pictures - but our technology ... there is no need to explain in which century they stopped.
    1. +1
      August 25 2017
      And why is our technology bad? It’s almost not inferior to amers; it means that with such theft, we need to be able to build and build especially in naval weapons, we even overtook them, not stupid people working in our design bureaus would not interfere
    2. 0
      August 25 2017
      Quote: EFLINTuk
      and our technologies ... no need to explain in which century they stopped.

      And your technology smacks of Goebbels!
  13. 0
    August 25 2017
    We still have the 4th generation not brought to mind, and they everywhere shout about the fifth without ceasing.
  14. 0
    August 25 2017
    A hybrid nuclear power plant with one “traditional” nuclear reactor and the other with a liquid metal one, like on the Lyre. Universal launchers for high-precision missiles for various purposes - "advanced" "Caliber". New high-speed rocket torpedoes. The possibility of landing and taking aboard combat swimmers is a docking camera. Equipped with unmanned submarines. In principle, all technologies individually already exist and are tested. Arrange in a new elegant building, and get the fifth-generation submarine "hunter".

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"