The head of the DPRK demanded to intensify the production of rocket engines

25
North Korean leader Kim Cheng UN ordered to expand the production of solid-propellant rocket engines and rocket warheads, reports Interfax message tstak.



According to the information, on the eve of Kim Cheng Un "visited the Institute of Chemical Materials at the Academy of Military Sciences of the DPRK, where he familiarized himself with the process of producing rocket engines and warhead tips."

He instructed the institute to produce more solid-fuel rocket engines by expanding their manufacturing process using carbon and carbon materials,
said the North Korean news agency.

Recall that this summer Pyongyang conducted test launches of two Khwanson-14 ballistic missiles, calling them intercontinental. The DPRK said that now their missiles could reach the territory of the United States. In response, the UN Security Council and Washington adopted additional sanctions against Pyongyang. The situation on the Korean Peninsula sharply worsened, the neighboring countries began to prepare for a possible conflict, and President Trump spoke about the possibility of a military solution to the problem.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    23 August 2017 08: 33
    "The tips of the head" ... lol
    I would tell you for the "tips", gentlemen of journalism ...
    1. +1
      23 August 2017 08: 40
      "The red flaky tip them on the collar in a cast-iron design" 72 meters
      1. 0
        23 August 2017 12: 31
        This is a solid fuel Pukguksong-2. A very right decision to focus on them. For the DPRK, it is important to achieve not only the guaranteed destruction of South Korea, but the guaranteed destruction of Japan, in the event of aggression against the DPRK. ICBMs will be shot down with a high probability, but with medium-range solid propellants they can do little.
    2. 0
      23 August 2017 08: 42
      Quote: Gray Brother
      "The tips of the head."
      - Yes, it’s the ORDER they have, with the original ... But in fact, what do you say: “Wow, it’s hurt by Eun! How did the Yankees get it? VICTORY ...
      PySy: If only we couldn’t sideways!
    3. 3vs
      0
      23 August 2017 08: 42
      And why not - there he is in the picture, such a yellow one! laughing
      1. 0
        23 August 2017 09: 23
        Quote: 3vs
        And why not - there he is in the picture, such a yellow one!

        Now with a banana flavor.
      2. 0
        23 August 2017 14: 36
        This is not a tip, but a normal, traditional S. Korean tip
    4. +3
      24 August 2017 15: 03
      Quote: Gray Brother
      "The tips of the runners ...


      In vain boil, this is a translation from the Koreans. You probably don’t know at all or don’t remember the Korea magazine in the 80s?
      There were pearls ..., "Crocodile" nervously smoked in the corner.
  2. +14
    23 August 2017 09: 02
    The head of the DPRK demanded to intensify the production of rocket engines

    Bender work threw!
  3. 0
    23 August 2017 09: 35
    The DPRK was sanctioned by America with great sanctions, even the production of missiles increased. Another sanction from overseas, they will have more missiles than in the forest of Christmas trees. The rocket taiga wakes up hard to destroy. Timber trucks will be bought from the USA to transport this forest.
    1. 0
      23 August 2017 14: 38
      You just need to give them a few pieces of Yars by September 1 (the day of knowledge), to plant an avenue of Topol. May people be pleased
  4. 0
    23 August 2017 09: 41
    Quote: Gray Brother
    "The tips of the head" ... lol
    I would tell you for the "tips", gentlemen of journalism ...

    I’m embarrassed to ask, what made you so amused at the mention of a “warhead tip”?
    1. 0
      23 August 2017 10: 40
      Yes, Eun looks "all the same" to US threats, and now, following Iran, he is also accelerating the development of missiles. And again, it is not entirely clear what the United States has achieved with its threat policy?
      North Korean television shows nuclear strike on US


      And actually the DPRK movie itself
    2. 0
      23 August 2017 10: 48
      Quote: Old26
      I’m embarrassed to ask, what made you so amused at the mention of a “warhead tip”?

      The level of education of current graduates of the journalism faculty which this phrase does not pierce the eyes.
  5. 0
    23 August 2017 10: 52
    Quote: quilted jacket
    And actually the DPRK movie itself

    Previously, the videos were more effective. And then two starts “Hwason-12” and two “Scud” (by the way, cool). And not nuclear mushrooms, nothing ...
    1. 0
      23 August 2017 14: 01
      Quote: Old26
      and two Scuda

      It is rather this missile called Hwason-7 with an increased range since the Japanese said that its flight range was 1000 kilometers.


      Quote: Old26
      (by the way, cool). And not nuclear mushrooms, nothing ...

      It says that this is a blow to the American base of Guam, but it is nevertheless closer than the territory of the United States. As for the ammunition that they want to shoot, it is not known in any case that they stated that they would not shoot at the island itself on which the US military base is located and would target missiles at 30 -40 kilometers from it to cause a tsunami that will "wash away" everything from the island.
  6. 0
    23 August 2017 13: 19
    They invented words ... to intensify
  7. 0
    23 August 2017 14: 28
    Quote: Gray Brother
    Quote: Old26
    I’m embarrassed to ask, what made you so amused at the mention of a “warhead tip”?

    The level of education of current graduates of the journalism faculty which this phrase does not pierce the eyes.

    To me, a techie, it (a phrase) also does not prick my eyes. Since, in principle, it is written correctly.
  8. 0
    23 August 2017 18: 49
    Quote: quilted jacket
    It is rather this missile called Hwason-7 with an increased range since the Japanese said that its flight range was 1000 kilometers.

    In the photo, the launch of a rocket known as Scud-ER (sometimes called Hwasong-7, sometimes KN-04). Although now it is most often mentioned that Hwasong-7 is No-Dong-A (I will soon have more gray hair from these designations).
    Everything is fine, but only Hwasong-7 or No-Dong has a range of about 1200-1500 km. And this means that "will not finish" to Guam

    Quote: quilted jacket
    It says that this is a blow to the American base of Guam, but it is nevertheless closer than the territory of the United States. As for the ammunition that they want to shoot, it is not known in any case that they stated that they would not shoot at the island itself on which the US military base is located and would target missiles at 30 -40 kilometers from it to cause a tsunami that will "wash away" everything from the island.

    I always like all such statements about the tsunami. I somehow cited the parameters of a wave (not a tsunami) that occurs during a nuclear explosion. So here. With an explosion of 100 Mt (I emphasize a 100 megaton) charge, the wave will be about 9 km - 200-450 meters. But at a distance of 40 km - about 40 meters. But only our "Korean friends" do not have a 100 megaton charge. And at a distance of 40 km, I'm afraid the wave will be several meters high. Of course, such a wave will do some business, but as for "everything will be washed away" - well, very big doubts

    Quote: Arzoo
    This is a solid fuel Pukguksong-2. A very right decision to focus on them. For the DPRK, it is important to achieve not only the guaranteed destruction of South Korea, but the guaranteed destruction of Japan, in the event of aggression against the DPRK. ICBMs will be shot down with a high probability, but with medium-range solid propellants they can do little.

    It's not just about this rocket. But also about SLBMs Pukguksong-1, and maybe about promising missiles Hwasong-15, Hwasong-16, Hwasong-17
    The guaranteed destruction of Japan by North Korea cannot be achieved by any means. For this, it is necessary to have not just a large number of missiles, but, most importantly, launchers.
    Shoot down cash located in Japan with Korean ICBMs IMPOSSIBLE. But to shoot down medium-range missiles (no difference, liquid and solid fuel) is just not an insoluble problem
    1. 0
      23 August 2017 19: 10
      Quote: Old26
      Everything is fine, but only Hwasong-7 or No-Dong has a range of about 1200-1500 km. And this means that "will not finish" to Guam


      Quote: Old26
      I always like all such statements about the tsunami. I somehow cited the parameters of a wave (not a tsunami) that occurs during a nuclear explosion.

      Well, they don’t have to quibble (the DPRK and the USA) are now just trying to “take each other” so to speak, and here any means are good, in particular, exaggerating their capabilities.
  9. 0
    23 August 2017 19: 17
    Quote: quilted jacket
    Well, they don’t have to quibble (the DPRK and the USA) are now just trying to “take each other” so to speak, and here any means are good, in particular, exaggerating their capabilities.

    Yes, I do not quibble. It is clear that all this is really an attempt to "take on a fright" ...
    1. 0
      23 August 2017 19: 27
      Quote: Old26
      Yes, I do not quibble.

      Well, it's better to watch a video about the military power of the DPRK smile .
  10. 0
    23 August 2017 20: 20
    Quote: quilted jacket
    Well, it's better to watch a video about the military power of the DPRK

    Cutting is not bad. as well as the 2017 parade. Honestly, the second time I see the launch of KN-18 (SCAD with controlled warhead). Yes, and perhaps volleys MLRS KN-16 (240 mm with 22 pipes). Well, on the Kuksany beach - beautiful, but it’s clear that staged
    1. 0
      24 August 2017 12: 42
      Quote: Old26
      Cutting is not bad. as well as the 2017 parade.

      So the fact of the matter is that the “cutting” new with the technology for 2017 was previously similar, but if it wasn’t a mistake, with personnel from 2015.
      Quote: Old26
      Honestly, the second time I see the launch of KN-18 (SCAD with controlled warhead).

      Almost exactly the same (SCAD with controlled warhead) is in service with China - DF-15 (if I remember correctly) and Iran called "Emad"
  11. 0
    24 August 2017 14: 58
    Quote: quilted jacket
    Almost exactly the same (SCAD with controlled warhead) is in service with China - DF-15 (if I remember correctly) and Iran called "Emad"

    Yes, I specifically say that I see the start of the Korean second time