Night Attack of the Narva Hussars

30
The Russian infantry during the First World War successfully practiced night attacks. But could cavalry carry out night attacks? About the night attack of the Russian Hussars - this article.

27 August 1914, the 13 Cavalry Division marched from the village of Kamen to the village of Jozefov. A day before this, the village was captured by Austrian infantry. The vanguard was sent ahead - the 1 squadron of the 13 hussar Narva regiment under the command of the captain Baranov.



In the hunt for carts.
At der. Kalishany received an order: 4 machine guns, under the guise of the 5 th squadron of the Narva hussars, take der. Kolchin to ensure the right flank of the division.

At the approach to the village. Yuzefov from the 13 Uhlansky Vladimirsky regiment received a report stating that movement of enemy carts was observed behind the suburb.

Narva Hussars were ordered to attack and seize the enemy's train.

The 2 and 3 squadrons of the regiment under the command of Colonel S. M. Lempitsky turned into lava — it was necessary to reconnoiter the area in the Pravno-Neshava-Rybitva area. As soon as the squadrons passed pos. Yuzefov, bypassing him from the south side, as shrapnel fire was opened on them by Austrian batteries - but due to high ruptures he caused insignificant damage.

By this time, the enemy's carts had already moved so far that their capture, and even under enemy fire, was impractical. Therefore, the squadrons, going into the woods and sending intelligence, expected the approach of their artillery and infantry - parts of the Life Guards of the 3 Infantry Regiment of His Majesty.

The reconnaissance of the 2 and 3 squadrons at that time detected the enemy’s infantry who had occupied the trenches in the forest.

The approached parts of the Life Guards 3 Infantry Regiment of His Majesty began an offensive on the move, without reconnaissance and training. Guards arrows went too far - and, because of the small size, their left flank began to bypass the enemy. The right-flank company of the regiment went into a bayonet attack, but, in the situation of a numerical superiority of the enemy, was forced to retreat.

Night attack.
Getting quickly dark. At this time there were cries: "Cavalry forward!" Since the shouts came from the area where the Guards arrows had just attacked, one could assume one of two things: either the Austrians are running and the cavalry is needed for pursuit, or the arrows are cut off by the enemy, and help is needed from the cavalry.

The regiment commander, Colonel Polovtsov, sent Colonel Lempitsky for a personal report of the situation to the division commander. Lempitsky returned with an order: the Narva Hussar Regiment, supported by the 2 squadrons of the 13 Dragoon Military Order of the Regiment and the 2 s of the hundreds of 9 Don Cossack Regiment, supported the Guards riflemen.

But the regiment had already attacked the enemy trenches.

The first to attack was the 3 squadron commanded by staff captain Veselov, the 2 squadron commanded by captain Mikhailov and the 6 squadron commanded by Lieutenant Golenovsky, and then the 4 squadron commanded by squadrons under squadron commands. 1 th squadron, remaining at the disposal of the commander of the infantry regiment at the village. Neshava, moved the last, but then was returned. The regiment communications command commanded by Lieutenant Baikov 2 also took part in the attack, while the 5 squadron, who was with the machine-gun crew on the flank of the regiment, did not participate in the battle.

Night Attack of the Narva Hussars
Il 1. Colonel N. P. Polovtsov, commander of the 13 Hussars of the Narva Regiment.

Over rough terrain in complete darkness, the regiment swiftly went on the attack, guided by the fires of enemy shots. The enemy, entrenched in the trenches, led intensive rifle and machine-gun fire.

With a shout of "Hurray", the hussars swept through 3 of a number of enemy trenches, chopped and stabbed the enemy entrenched in them. Bursting into the woods, the hussars fought off the half-capture of the guards shooters captured earlier by the Austrians. The Austrian infantry, knocked out of the trenches, was only able to escape due to the darkness — it fled in disarray and hid in the forest.

In the morning it became known from the orderlies that the enemy’s trenches were overwhelmed, in the literal sense of the word, killed by the Austrians.

Losses of Narva hussars - 8 officers and 38 privates killed and injured, another 11 hussars went missing. The horses were killed and injured 40, and missing - around 20.

The 13 hussar Narva regiment received special commendation from the command for this dashing night attack, and the commanders of the 3 squadron, Staff Captain Veselov and 2 Squadron, Captain Mikhailov received military awards.

The cossacks who contributed to the attack also suffered losses.
In the Military Journal of the 9 Don Don Cossack General Adjutant Count Orlov-Denisov Regiment wrote: “On August 27 the regiment with the Narva Hussars was ordered to attack the enemy’s position at the village. Scratching Moving to the village and passing the village. Yuzefov shouts of “cavalry forward” began to be transmitted: the Guards arrows (3 guards. P. P.), Who were obsessed with pursuing the enemy, asked for help, around 6 their mouths were surrounded and almost cut off by reinforcements arriving to the enemy. It was already around 9 in the evening and it was completely dark when the regiment rushed to the rescue of the infantry with a geek and attacked the enemy; stunned by a formidable mighty geek and a surprise strike in the dark. The Austrians were shot down and began to retreat. The arrows were released. On this day, the regiment lost the killed 3 Cossacks, missing: 1 officer; the wounded: 1 officer and 7 Cossacks; horses killed 19, injured 9. This case cost the Austrians a lot more, since the next day more than 30 people were found dead at the battlefield. ” (RGVIA. F. 2007. Op. 1. D. 38. Ch. 5).

Russian cavalry in the course of the entire war rescued other branches of the army and brilliantly acted in the most diverse conditions of the tactical situation.


Il 2. The scheme of the battle.


Il 3. The officers of the 13 th hussar Narva regiment.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    16 August 2017 07: 40
    Great article. Very interesting details of the military work of the Russian cavalry in 1914. The author - my sincere gratitude for the work done! hi
  2. +5
    16 August 2017 07: 43
    N.P. Polovtsov-participated in the White Movement as part of the Armed Forces of the South of Russia and the Russian Army, Baron Wrangel. In 1920, he was evacuated from Yalta. In exile in France, he lived in Medon. In the 1920 years he gave lectures and reports on political topics at the Russian Club in Paris, and died in the 1941 year.
    1. +11
      16 August 2017 11: 05
      Quote: parusnik
      N.P. Polovtsov-participated in the White Movement as part of the Armed Forces of the South of Russia and the Russian Army, Baron Wrangel. In 1920, he was evacuated from Yalta. In exile in France, he lived in Medon. In the 1920 years he gave lectures and reports on political topics at the Russian Club in Paris, and died in the 1941 year.

      So what? Because of this, his military merits in the First World War mean nothing? This is a hero of Russia. And the heroes must be remembered.
      1. +3
        16 August 2017 15: 44
        Something similar comments were not written when I wrote about the fate of the royal officers. WWI heroes who later became red commanders or fought on the side of nationalists ...
        1. +1
          16 August 2017 15: 48
          Quote: parusnik
          Something similar comments were not written when I wrote about the fate of the royal officers. WWI heroes who later became red commanders or fought on the side of nationalists ...

          About the heroes of the First World War, who became red commanders or supported the Soviet regime, and so it is said a lot. It was a civil war, everyone had their own truth. But those who spoke with Germany against the USSR are traitors.
          1. +2
            16 August 2017 16: 00
            In the years of WWI, no one knew who would be who and on whose side. Here, as I find material, I write similar comments .. I don’t do a cult.
          2. +5
            16 August 2017 19: 25
            Wend, regarding the betrayal, I agree, but the emigrants who supported the Nazis still have a stretch, but you can understand (understand, but not forgive), and if they do this they are already more than disgusting. After all, besides Vlasov there was still a bunch of Soviet commanders-traitors
            1. 0
              17 August 2017 10: 13
              Quote: Monarchist
              Wend, regarding the betrayal, I agree, but the emigrants who supported the Nazis still have a stretch, but you can understand (understand, but not forgive), and if they do this they are already more than disgusting. After all, besides Vlasov there was still a bunch of Soviet commanders-traitors

              You know, I can’t understand. Being against the regime is one thing; going to your country with an enemy is another. But this is my attitude.
              1. +2
                17 August 2017 15: 25
                We confuse the enemies of Soviet power (more precisely, communist power, the Soviets came up with the Socialist Revolutionaries); Kornilov, Denikin, Kolchak ... including those who later with the Germans in 1941 began a war against the USSR (our Motherland); Krasnov, Shkuro, Dotsenko ... and the traitors Vlasov, the brigade commissar Zhilenkov and others. True Leninists do not like to write about the real Leninist, a member of the military council of the 32 army. But there was also the divisional commissar Nikiforov (this rank, not the position), the regimental commissar Fominykh and a number of other major party leaders. These were traitors, and Krasnov and others like him were enemies. They did not take the oath of Soviet power and cannot be traitors, by definition. If you rank them as traitors, then Lenin and his comrades were traitors to our homeland, because they conducted propaganda in the Russian army, called for bayonets in the land and at home. And they didn’t call for war with the Germans, but on the contrary offered to run away. So the Bolsheviks were traitors to our country, by definition it’s not mine, but Bolsheviks. So, my opinion is that there is a difference between enemies and traitors, and you don’t need to dump all in one pile.
                1. +2
                  17 August 2017 16: 03
                  Quote: captain
                  Tips come up with the Socialist Revolutionaries

                  Sorry, I’ll correct it a little. The first Council was the Council of Commissioners from Ivanovo. And the first leader was elected non-partisan. It was created in 1905.
                  Quote: captain
                  But there was also the divisional commissar Nikiforov (this rank, not the position), the regimental commissar Fominykh and a number of other major party leaders. These were traitors ...,

                  It would be worth mentioning the "true Leninists" -Yeltsin and Gorbachev. Now, these are Traitors of a planetary scale! Closer in time. wink Traitors, they are traitors at all times. And contempt for them all. Party affiliation has nothing to do with it. The harm done by the traitor is important.
                  Ah, so you are right.
                2. 0
                  17 August 2017 16: 05
                  Quote: captain
                  We confuse the enemies of Soviet power (more precisely, communist power, the Soviets came up with the Socialist Revolutionaries); Kornilov, Denikin, Kolchak ... including those who later with the Germans in 1941 began a war against the USSR (our Motherland); Krasnov, Shkuro, Dotsenko ... and the traitors Vlasov, the brigade commissar Zhilenkov and others. True Leninists do not like to write about the real Leninist, a member of the military council of the 32 army. But there was also the divisional commissar Nikiforov (this rank, not the position), the regimental commissar Fominykh and a number of other major party leaders. These were traitors, and Krasnov and others like him were enemies. They did not take the oath of Soviet power and cannot be traitors, by definition. If you rank them as traitors, then Lenin and his comrades were traitors to our homeland, because they conducted propaganda in the Russian army, called for bayonets in the land and at home. And they didn’t call for war with the Germans, but on the contrary offered to run away. So the Bolsheviks were traitors to our country, by definition it’s not mine, but Bolsheviks. So, my opinion is that there is a difference between enemies and traitors, and you don’t need to dump all in one pile.

                  I repeat. Fight the regime and come to conquer your country with the enemy different things. Lenin did not come to the territory of Russia with the enemy. Although it caused Russia a lot of harm.
  3. +19
    16 August 2017 10: 02
    Thank. Good article
  4. +9
    16 August 2017 12: 48
    Alexey, my gratitude to you for the work done. Due to the circumstances, now is not about that, at least 8/10 knows little about PMV. There was a paradoxical situation: even during the Second World War, the wearing of awards received in the WWI was allowed, and for what merits? As if feats were accomplished only under the red banner.
    1. +1
      16 August 2017 14: 27
      WWII, of course, we must remember and honor the heroes, just not to the peak of WWII. Our authorities are democratic, they have a red project across their throats. In my opinion, they began to politicize, they are trying to bring discord.
      1. +2
        17 August 2017 08: 59
        Quote: avva2012
        Our authorities are democratic, they have a red project across their throats.

        That which is not, cannot stand across the throat Yes
        1. 0
          17 August 2017 10: 22
          That which is not, cannot stand across the throat

          Dreaming is not harmful wink
          1. +2
            17 August 2017 10: 32
            Quote: avva2012
            Dreaming is not harmful

            Dream! lol
            1. 0
              17 August 2017 12: 39
              Dream!

              What we want is what we do at home. According to the article, what is there, or just emoticons?
              The problem is quite serious, in my opinion. I believe that history is continuous and the descendants of the actions of their ancestors should not be forgotten. This is, to be honest and not biased. And then, along with real heroes, someone is trying to stick Mannerheim, Wrangel into the participants of the First World War and yes, they fought, but for some, the main thing is that they cut the “reds". Here is such a reconciliation
              And, so, a low bow to our soldiers at ALL times, who stood behind and built Russia.
  5. +11
    16 August 2017 13: 05
    Thanks to the author. Thank you for restoring respect for the Russian army.
  6. +1
    16 August 2017 17: 42
    The officers have a beautiful uniform in the photo. As soon as they are not confused in battle in this interweaving of cords? After all, you have to work with a saber, and shoot from a vinar when it is tight.
    1. 0
      17 August 2017 10: 05
      But these cords are sewn tightly, you can’t get confused in them.
    2. +1
      17 August 2017 10: 32
      These are smart tunics! They went into battle in a different form.
      1. 0
        17 August 2017 10: 49
        Parading out of order, to be more precise, the blue dolomen, the red chakchirs, the yellow band on the cap, and the blue top.
        1. 0
          17 August 2017 12: 19
          speckled chakchirs, EMNIP
          1. 0
            17 August 2017 12: 23
            Right. Even more beautiful.
  7. 0
    17 August 2017 16: 25
    Quote: avva2012
    Here is such a reconciliation

    Why reconcile with nonexistent dummies?
  8. 0
    17 August 2017 17: 27
    Quote: Wend
    Lenin did not come to the territory of Russia with the enemy.

    He came through the territory of the enemy, on the enemy money and help the enemy.
    1. 0
      18 August 2017 00: 06
      This popular scheme is already sore. I recommend watching the movie "July 6th."
      It is necessary to end the civil war by dividing into “red” and “white”. The subject of the article is the military prowess of ancestors in whom our (living) generations are in unpaid debt. In the end, both the Red Army and the Soviet Army (and the fleet) left the tsarist Russian army (and the fleet).
      1. 0
        18 August 2017 09: 28
        So it ended in '91. A betrayal of the homeland has no statute of limitations.
        1. 0
          23 August 2017 00: 40
          You better engage in contemporaries, starting with Gorbi. And what ended there in the 91st, history will show.