Military Review

China has demanded that India "correct the error" at the border

60
The PRC Defense Ministry demanded that India withdraw its troops from the border area of ​​Chinese territory, reminding of the invincibility of the PLA, reports Interfax-AVN.

China has demanded that India "correct the error" at the border


We strongly demand that the Indian side take practical steps to correct the mistake, stop provocations and, together with China, ensure the protection of peace and tranquility in the border area,
said the representative of the military department Wu Qian.

He warned that the capabilities of the PLA to protect sovereignty and territorial integrity "are constantly being strengthened," so "India should not leave the situation to its own devices and not feed unrealistic illusions."

You can shake the mountains, but you cannot shake the People’s Liberation Army of China,
added qian.

Earlier it was reported that units of Indian border guards in June violated the state border between the two countries and invaded the territory of the Chinese district of Dunlan, preventing the construction of the road there.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry has already made tough demands on the Indian side to withdraw its military from the territory of the PRC.
Photos used:
Wei Peiquan / Xinhua
60 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Belyash
    Belyash 24 July 2017 11: 59
    +10
    You can’t just shout at India so easily. They are also not enough.
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 24 July 2017 12: 03
      +11
      Quote: Belyash
      You can’t just shout at India so easily. They are also not enough.

      So the number of Chinese warnings is a secret value. And so GDP will ring Modi and u will be corrected
      1. pjastolov
        pjastolov 24 July 2017 12: 08
        +11
        I wonder, with what fright did India trample into China? like they have no disputed territories? recourse
        1. vovanpain
          vovanpain 24 July 2017 12: 20
          +21
          Quote: pjastolov
          I wonder, with what fright did India trample into China? like they have no disputed territories? recourse

          Volodya there because of Tibet they had graters for some time now.
          The unresolved border issue and mutual claims on a number of disputed territories remain one of the main irritants in relations between New Delhi and Beijing, as well as a potential hotbed of another armed confrontation. Two territories became the subject of contention, one of them being the uninhabited highland plateau Aksaychin in the western sector of the border. This practically unsuitable area with a total area of ​​about 38 thousand square kilometers is located at an altitude of 4,5-7 thousand meters above sea level and is a chain of glaciers in the middle of an uninhabited rocky desert. However, it is of strategic importance for the PRC as an outpost that controls Xinjiang’s communications with Tibet. In 1962, the area was occupied by Chinese troops during the armed conflict and is now under the actual control of Beijing, but New Delhi insists that Aksaychin is part of the Indian region of Ladakh (Jammu and Kashmir). The eastern section, on the contrary, is controlled by India, but it is claimed by China, which claims a significant part of the states of Arunachal Pradesh and Sikkim - an area of ​​about 150 thousand square kilometers. The parties have made repeated attempts to resolve their border dispute. Due to the lack of agreement between them that fixes the actual control line, hundreds of border violations occur annually on both sides, which sometimes turn into clashes. One of the achievements of recent years in the process of resolving the dispute was an agreement to establish a hotline between the headquarters of the armed forces, and There are also special checkpoints for holding meetings of border guards of the two countries along the line of actual control and resolving contentious issues directly on the ground.
          glav.su/forum/4/16/threads/1097875/ hi
          1. pjastolov
            pjastolov 24 July 2017 12: 27
            +5
            Did not know hi thanks for the info drinks
            1. Solomon Kane
              Solomon Kane 24 July 2017 12: 45
              +9
              Volodya, hello! It’s not Feng Shui that the Indians are on the border, thereby violating the universal harmony of the Middle Kingdom ..... what
              1. cniza
                cniza 24 July 2017 13: 02
                +2
                Kostya hi , good time ! Yeah, but Feng Shui was used for the burial ritual, at first. lol
            2. cniza
              cniza 24 July 2017 12: 47
              +3
              Greetings Vladimir! hi there’s that knot there and it’s impossible to resolve it with some requirements.
              1. pjastolov
                pjastolov 24 July 2017 12: 57
                +5
                Hello Victor hi hello Konstantin hi , not really if they will arrange a small warfare between them? feel
                1. cniza
                  cniza 24 July 2017 13: 02
                  +2
                  And he practically did not stop there.
                  1. pjastolov
                    pjastolov 24 July 2017 13: 05
                    +3
                    in terms of resources - their possibilities are almost endless
                    1. cniza
                      cniza 24 July 2017 13: 09
                      +1
                      Everything is not so simple there, mountains and everything happens differently.
                      1. pjastolov
                        pjastolov 24 July 2017 13: 10
                        +3
                        Well, let's see, allies
                2. cniza
                  cniza 24 July 2017 13: 12
                  +1
                  Quote: pjastolov
                  Well, let's see, allies


                  Allies, until it came to partition.
                  1. pjastolov
                    pjastolov 24 July 2017 13: 13
                    +3
                    There is no need to divide, after the mattress only lol
                    1. cniza
                      cniza 24 July 2017 13: 15
                      +2
                      The United States will never stick its nose in it, it will nip at a time.
                      1. pjastolov
                        pjastolov 24 July 2017 13: 17
                        +5
                        I'm talking about the section of mattresses on sovereign states lol
                    2. cniza
                      cniza 24 July 2017 13: 19
                      +1
                      Quote: pjastolov
                      I'm talking about the section of mattresses on sovereign states lol


                      Well, this process is just around the corner.
          2. de_monSher
            de_monSher 24 July 2017 20: 28
            +1
            YES and besides Tibet, there they still have some "little things" ... *))
        2. Vasilenko Vladimir
          Vasilenko Vladimir 24 July 2017 20: 27
          +3
          Quote: pjastolov
          like they have no disputed territories?

          with them ?!
          1. pjastolov
            pjastolov 24 July 2017 20: 32
            +2
            Well, I said above - I didn’t know what to poke then?
            1. Vasilenko Vladimir
              Vasilenko Vladimir 24 July 2017 20: 34
              0
              and you look at the thread, was your post I answered it, or should I read the entire page first?
              1. pjastolov
                pjastolov 24 July 2017 20: 50
                +2
                my koment - 12.08
                the answer to it is 12.20 (immediately below it)
                your answer is 20.27
                Am I missing anything?
                1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                  Vasilenko Vladimir 24 July 2017 21: 48
                  +1
                  Once again, I read the post and answered it
                  why are you as a young lady offended?
                  did not seem to be rude, did not insult, millet gave an answer

                  p / s / at 12.08 was in the forest, picking mushrooms hi
        3. Dart2027
          Dart2027 25 July 2017 20: 21
          0
          Quote: pjastolov
          like they have no disputed territories

          Why is there. At one time, a separate special forces unit was formed in India, consisting solely of Chinese emigrants, and prepared to conduct Far East in China.
      2. zoolu300
        zoolu300 25 July 2017 16: 07
        0
        And who will listen to him? In a serious scenario, his calls mean nothing.
    2. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 24 July 2017 12: 07
      +4
      Quote: Belyash
      You can’t just shout at India so easily.

      Duc, the Chinese do not shout, but politely "firmly demand." But do not wait for “hacks”, do not even hope. laughing
    3. Aleksey7777777
      Aleksey7777777 24 July 2017 12: 07
      +3
      Wow)) There they themselves probably got confused, where is their territory. Yes, everything is formidable rhetoric and will not be limited - will not two such colossus of nuclear weapons fight over a patch of land with a pile of stones? There, even the USA did not dare to deal with the DPRK, but here completely different weight categories of countries ...
    4. siberalt
      siberalt 24 July 2017 12: 40
      +2
      Maybe the Chinese were not building the road there? It is quite in the Chinese spirit.
      1. KUOLEMA
        KUOLEMA 24 July 2017 13: 03
        +4
        redneck is not something that we took and gave back the islands and islets))) there is a forest, there is interest and there is no forest, there is no interest)))
        1. Vasilenko Vladimir
          Vasilenko Vladimir 24 July 2017 20: 28
          +1
          Quote: KUOLEMA
          not that we took and gave islands and islets

          or maybe it’s not necessary like that based on the yellow press ?!
    5. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 24 July 2017 15: 13
      +3
      Quote: Belyash
      You can’t just shout at India so easily. They are also not enough.

      Yeah ...... you need to agree here, because both sides lose. War is the brake of two growing economies and the slaughter of three billion inhabitants of the planet. The only ones who benefit from the conflict between the Chinese and the Indians are the United States.
      1. Basarev
        Basarev 24 July 2017 16: 47
        +3
        recalling the invincibility of the PLA

        This indestructible PLA once even the Vietnamese jammed.
        1. Blackgrifon
          Blackgrifon 24 July 2017 20: 26
          +2
          Nevertheless, in the only "heated" conflict between India and China in the twentieth century, it was the latter who won
          1. Basarev
            Basarev 24 July 2017 20: 56
            +1
            They compared India with Vietnam ... India is a worthless country, even more dense and superstitious than China.
    6. DOCTOR ZLO
      DOCTOR ZLO 25 July 2017 20: 25
      +1
      Quote: Belyash
      You can’t just shout at India so easily. They are also not enough.

      Already shouted more than once, Tibet belongs to China, not India ...
  2. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 24 July 2017 12: 04
    +2
    I think the conflict will be settled. Russia, as a partner of India and China, will take part in resolving the conflict.
    1. soroKING
      soroKING 24 July 2017 12: 17
      +1
      well guys! gave each other in the face and parted wassat
      1. Dezinto
        Dezinto 24 July 2017 12: 24
        +1
        well guys! gave each other in the face and parted


        I think so too. So much to the heap. Since everywhere in the world a mess reminded of itself. What they say here we also have territorial graters.

        And what kind of automatic machine is this, another Chinese craft?
        1. pjastolov
          pjastolov 24 July 2017 12: 33
          +6
          And what kind of automatic machine is this, another Chinese craft?
          no, is it their development of QBZ-95 or some kind of modification, they differ in size
          here is an article about him https://topwar.ru/8871-originalnaya-shturmovaya-v
          intovka-qbz-95-sdelano-v-kitae.html
          1. Tusv
            Tusv 24 July 2017 13: 07
            0
            Quote: pjastolov
            no, is it their development of QBZ-95 or some kind of modification,

            Already painfully similar to the Australian Bushmaster M17S
          2. Dezinto
            Dezinto 24 July 2017 13: 12
            +2
            this is their development QBZ-95

            I read with interest
            Thank you dear man ... hi
            1. pjastolov
              pjastolov 24 July 2017 20: 34
              +2
              Good people don't mind hi
      2. DOCTOR ZLO
        DOCTOR ZLO 25 July 2017 20: 42
        +1
        Quote: soroKING
        well guys! gave each other in the face and parted wassat

        The PRC is building a railway line in Pakistan, where should they now disperse?
    2. pvv113
      pvv113 24 July 2017 12: 26
      +5
      Yes, it seems that Russia will not do without a mission. China and India are the largest countries in terms of population. Together they represent more than a third of the total population of the Earth. It’s not clear what their conflict might lead to.
  3. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 24 July 2017 13: 20
    0
    But we lacked only conflicts between these countries. Though...
  4. ML-334
    ML-334 24 July 2017 13: 27
    0
    Progress on the face, from expressing concern to demand. So, in half a century, what kind of action will be applied. What was required from the Americans?
  5. Gardamir
    Gardamir 24 July 2017 14: 05
    +3
    Well, we didn’t argue with China, but passed it in 2005. 337 square kilometers and silence.
    1. Antonio_Mariarti
      Antonio_Mariarti 24 July 2017 14: 14
      +1
      Quote: Gardamir
      Well, we didn’t argue with China, but passed it in 2005. 337 square kilometers and silence.

      Are you talking about Damansky? If so, then it was a controversial island that did not belong either to the USSR then or to China. No one owned it. The Russian Federation simply abandoned its right to establish relations with China.
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 24 July 2017 16: 44
        +4
        The Russian Federation simply abandoned its right to establish relations with China.
        And how many more territories do we have that we can abandon to establish relations with other countries?
      2. Graz
        Graz 24 July 2017 20: 16
        0
        as I heard the island itself is wandering, now it has drifted closer to the Chinese border, so he allegedly gave Yeltsin
      3. Vasilenko Vladimir
        Vasilenko Vladimir 24 July 2017 20: 31
        +1
        Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
        No one owned it. The Russian Federation simply abandoned its right to establish relations with China.

        actually owned by the Chinese since that conflict
        1. Antonio_Mariarti
          Antonio_Mariarti 24 July 2017 23: 05
          0
          No, they didn’t. They then tried to capture the island and part of the territory, but were rebuffed. After that, no one owned it, and nobody needed it. Simply, Putin, on my part, did the right thing, because after this transfer our relations began to improve and money went from China and we started selling products there. Well, I would have given up the territory that the RF, USSR, and RI almost always had. But Damansky was always controversial.
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
          No one owned it. The Russian Federation simply abandoned its right to establish relations with China.

          actually owned by the Chinese since that conflict
          1. Vasilenko Vladimir
            Vasilenko Vladimir 25 July 2017 06: 26
            0
            Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
            No, did not own

            Well, do not write nonsense, but study the topic

            in the autumn of 1969, an agreement was reached on the cessation of hostile actions and that the troops of the parties would remain in their positions, which at that time meant the actual transfer of the island to China.
            1. DOCTOR ZLO
              DOCTOR ZLO 25 July 2017 20: 51
              +2
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
              No, did not own

              Well, do not write nonsense, but study the topic
              in the autumn of 1969, an agreement was reached on the cessation of hostile actions and that the troops of the parties would remain in their positions, which at that time meant the actual transfer of the island to China.

              Where did so many trolls come from, if only to say something disgusting to the bushes ....
              Despite the fact that the Soviet-Chinese conflict ended in the complete victory of the USSR, negotiations on Damansky’s affiliation lasted almost 20 years. Only in 1991 did this island officially become Chinese. Now it is called Zhenbao, which means “Precious” in translation. During the military conflict, the USSR lost 58 people, 4 of which were officers. The PRC, according to various sources, has lost its troops from 500 to 3000. For their courage, five border guards were awarded the title of Hero of the Soviet Union, three of which were posthumous. Another 148 servicemen were awarded with other orders and medals. - Read more on FB.ru: http://fb.ru/article/159303/damanskiy-konflikt-go
              da

              http://fb.ru/article/159303/damanskiy-konflikt-go
              da
              In September 1969, during a meeting at the Beijing airport between the Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR Kosygin and the Chairman of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China Zhou En Laem, agreements were reached on a ceasefire on the border and demarcation (preliminary) on the Amur and Ussuri rivers in the middle of the main fairway. Based on this agreement, the line of behavior of the border guards on the Soviet-Chinese border was determined, which for many years became the basis for the protection of this section of the state border. However, the provocations did not stop. So in 1970-1972 years. 776 provocations were recorded only in the area of ​​the Far Eastern Border District, in 1977 - 799, and in 1979 g - more than 1000. In total, in 1975-1980. 6894 border violations were committed by the Chinese side. In 1979, the Chinese mastered 130 from the 300 islands of the Amur and Ussuri rivers, including 52 from 134, where the Soviet side did not allow economic activity.
              Source: http://www.modernarmy.ru/article/269/konflict-na-
              ostrove-damanskiy © Portal "Modern army"
              1. Vasilenko Vladimir
                Vasilenko Vladimir 25 July 2017 22: 46
                0
                Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
                Where did so many trolls come from, if only to say something disgusting to the bushes ...

                trollity you
                learn history

                After the ice melted, the exit of the Soviet border guards to Damansky was difficult, and sniper and machine-gun fire had to impede the Chinese attempts to capture it. September 10, 1969 was ordered to cease fire, apparently, to create a favorable background for negotiations that began the next day at the Beijing airport. Immediately, the Damansky and Kirkinsky Islands occupied the Chinese armed forces.

                further all garbage, the Chinese entered the island and did not leave there, you can count anything, say, but in fact they owned it
    2. Tusv
      Tusv 24 July 2017 14: 56
      +4
      Quote: Gardamir
      Well, we didn’t argue with China, but passed it in 2005. 337 square kilometers and silence

      Disputes are steeper there and are measured in thousands of square kilometers. The Chinese want to return 3,5 thousand km2, Hindus 43 thousand (the whole Moscow region in area)
  6. Graz
    Graz 24 July 2017 20: 15
    +1
    the Indians in this respect are allies to us, so that China doesn’t particularly impudent, it’s appetite now, oh yes, including land disputes, we don’t need to get into these Sino-Indian disputes, we should not be a negotiating platform, so we can shake hands to the sides and say beautiful words with a smart look
  7. vladimirw
    vladimirw 25 July 2017 10: 09
    +1
    I think another provocation of mattress covers. Provoke a conflict between India and China, and then warm your hands on it!
  8. zoolu300
    zoolu300 25 July 2017 16: 06
    0
    Unfortunately, the Fed owners are working in the right direction (harvesting the deceased Zbigniew). The only country in the region capable of withstanding at least somehow the military and economic power of China is India, because for the PLA it is more difficult to capture one state of India than the entire territory of the Russian Federation to Lake Baikal. Also, the political leadership of India, in contrast to the CCP, is much less monolithic, so getting agents of influence in India for the owners of the Fed is much easier. And the Indians created the conflict situation on this example.