Perspective BMP based on the Kurganets-25 platform. Infographics

The “695 Object” is a promising infantry fighting vehicle, created on the basis of the Kurganets-25 universal medium tracked platform.

The engine compartment of the platform is located in the front of the case and shifted to the right to improve the layout of the machine. To unload the assault, the ramp is used with an additional door in it. The mass of the machine will be approximately 25 tons. Passive armor will complement the active defense complex on the tower. Ammunition and weapons are isolated from the landing and crew.

The crew consists of three people. The troop compartment is designed for eight people.

Comments

[tchoni]

I will express exceptional IMHO. Initially, the Kurgan project hit me personally with its uselessness. Well, judge for yourselves: in fact, they developed an average platform that combines both low reliability of a caterpillar chassis and cardboard (at that time it was already practically proved by the example of American "Bradley") armor. In a word - olna joy - floats. In general, pissimism was complete.
However, in practice, the designers managed to create a very convenient chassis, truly universal and adaptable. And, most importantly, in my inexperienced opinion, quite technological. The problem of weak security, as I understand it, was managed, at least in theory, to be solved using dynamic and active defenses.
Against the background, as I personally think, of some problems with the T-15 and the general sharpening of the Armata platform under the anti-tank tank (sorry for the pun), vehicles based on the Kurgan platform have all chances to become the basis of the Russian Armed Forces troops. Until the creation of light tanks ISAU on their base.

[Artyom]

as for me, 57 mm should be put on this base. gun "derivation", 30 mm. the barrel is already outdated and modern reinforced western infantry fighting vehicles may not penetrate.

[seos]

NOT "may not penetrate", but is guaranteed not to penetrate even promising ammunition ..
The solution to the problem is a return to the 30X210V shell ...

[Alexaker]

There is knowledge that soon, in years, we will wave with batons so that we can use this technique.

[Sedoy]

for me so insufficiently powerful weapons ...
it was necessary to set the spark with a 57 mm automatic gun AU-220M



Rate of fire - 300 rounds per minute. The horizontal range of defeat is 16 km. Ammunition - more than a hundred shells. It perfectly affects all types of air targets and almost any type of armored vehicles, including tanks.

The 57 mm caliber may not even penetrate the frontal armor of the Abrams and Leopard, but a flurry of powerful enough high-explosive shells will simply blow down all external devices - first of all, optics and antennas, tear apart the tracks, and jam the tower.

[Kornvoli]

Quote: Sedoy

for me so insufficiently powerful weapons ...
it was necessary to set the spark with a 57 mm automatic gun AU-220M

Rate of fire - 300 rounds per minute. The horizontal range of defeat is 16 km. Ammunition - more than a hundred shells. It perfectly affects all types of air targets and almost any type of armored vehicles, including tanks.
The 57 mm caliber may not even penetrate the frontal armor of the Abrams and Leopard, but a flurry of powerful enough high-explosive shells will simply blow down all external devices - first of all, optics and antennas, tear apart the tracks, and jam the tower.

That's the whole charm of uninhabited systems, as the AU-220M combat module and others can be equipped according to the situation. If the combat power of 30mm automation is not enough, then they will put another module. 30mm is enough to solve tactical problems, but with tanks it’s better than Cornet)

[Alvul]

As far as I remember the profile of this car, there was a significantly protruding nose. I wonder how much this affects cross-country ability. And then he will get nosed at the exit from large slopes. Or, conversely, when lifting. In general, a suspicious silhouette. The impression is that the technique for limited conflicts, where survivability is more important than mass use, where a limited number of such machines will be quickly burned and there will be nothing to make up for in a timely manner. In my opinion, this affects the possibility of a quick maneuver when it is necessary to concentrate the necessary mass of troops in one place. Would it not turn out that this is only a “defense machine,” like the German Tiger in World War II?

[Dart]

Sofas in attack.