In the TFR denied reports of the termination of the investigation against Vasilyeva

32
Appeared in the media reports about the completion of the investigation of the "big case" of the former official of the Ministry of Defense Yevgenia Vasilyeva do not correspond to reality, reports RIA News statement by the representative of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation Svetlana Petrenko.

In the TFR denied reports of the termination of the investigation against Vasilyeva


This information is not true. Investigation of the criminal case continues
said Petrenko.

Vasilieva’s lawyer Hasan-Ali Borokov declined to comment on the progress of the investigation.

Earlier, Russian media, citing sources, reported that “in 2015, Vasilyeva was convicted on episodes of criminal activity separated from the main case of 12”. In total, the “big deal”, according to the publications, includes more than 40 episodes.

The agency reminds that the criminal case on “Oboronservis”, the key person involved in which is an ex-official of the Ministry of Defense, was instituted in 2012 year after disclosing a large-scale scheme of state property thefts. This case was worth the position of the head of the ministry - Anatoly Serdyukov.

Vasilyeva was sentenced to 5 years of imprisonment, but soon after arriving at the colony she was released on parole. At the same time, the court counted as a punishment the time spent under house arrest in her Moscow apartment.

Vasilyeva herself pleaded not guilty on one episode. The damage from its criminal actions, according to the calculations of the investigation, exceeded 3 billion rubles.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    15 June 2017 13: 52
    Unfortunately, we already saw the results of this investigation when an outspoken thief escaped with a slight fright ..... and here the question is not with her, but with our very “fair and humane” (and with respect to embezzlers very humane) so-called court.
    1. +12
      15 June 2017 14: 07
      There was such a wonderful film - “Vyborg Side” (Lenfilm, 1938) from the trilogy about Maxim. So there, in a lawsuit, after a brilliant speech by a lawyer who acquitted everyone, an old worker gets up and asks, “Are you, my dear man, tell me directly - are they bandits or not bandits?”
      So I want to ask SKR - a thief Vasiliev or not a thief? And remember Zheglov, where the thief should sit.
      1. +6
        15 June 2017 14: 14
        Quote: Reserve officer
        So I want to ask SKR - a thief Vasiliev or not a thief?

        Most likely the question will remain unanswered. Well, or such a fog will be let in that nothing will be clear.
        1. +7
          15 June 2017 14: 18
          Pasha, I agree. There are many options.
          1. Thief, but shared.
          2. Not a thief, but a mistress - everything was ownerless.
          3. How can a poet and artist be called a thief?
          4. FSB agent revealed a criminal network.
          5. Look into those honest eyes, how could she steal?
          Etc., Etc., Etc.
          1. +8
            15 June 2017 14: 22
            .. allow myself to add another option - a thief, but not the main one. Maybe he can put everyone ..... remember how in the "meeting place you cannot change" Fox: "tell the hunchback that if they don’t get me out of prison, I’ll surrender everyone" laughing
          2. +6
            15 June 2017 14: 26
            Exactly, Lesha. With a good lawyer (and Vasilyeva’s hardly a bad one) they can also make her an injured party, I would definitely not be surprised.
            1. +3
              16 June 2017 08: 51
              it can also make the injured party
              About six months ago, there was infa that they would return to her "acquired by overwork"?
              1. +5
                16 June 2017 09: 01
                It was so . It was with this fact in mind that I suggested Vasilyeva’s transition from the “accused” to the “victim”.
                1. +3
                  16 June 2017 09: 02
                  It was with this fact in mind that I suggested Vasilyeva’s transition from the “accused” to the “victim”
                  Another bloody victim? crying
                  1. +3
                    16 June 2017 09: 03
                    It is time for Liberastne to begin raising funds for the monument during his lifetime.
                    1. +2
                      16 June 2017 09: 10
                      It is time for Liberastne to begin raising funds for the monument during his lifetime.

                      It’s time for them to dump the river, people are tired of their whining.
                      It strains another. On arrival in Moscow, Tufft was asked which of the leaders of the position he considers more authoritative. He called Nemtsov and Navalny, noting at the same time: soon they will be useful to us. One already "came in handy", the other realized, went down the subway, plundered and hid for a week in the bullpen.
                      I won’t be surprised if the second comes closer to the elections. Who will take the place, it is not difficult to assume, Natsik and criminals, fans and other shelupon. Hope the shtirlits work on prevention. But this madam is not in danger, is studying to be a psychologist, then she will go into politics?
                      1. +3
                        16 June 2017 09: 46
                        Quote: Balu
                        I won’t be surprised if the second comes closer to the elections.

                        Well, provocations are inevitable anyway. And the closer the election, the more the degree of tension will increase.
                        Quote: Balu
                        Hope the shtirlits work on prevention.

                        I share your hope.
                        Quote: Balu
                        But this madam is not in danger, is studying to be a psychologist, then she will go into politics?

                        God forbid Russia such a politician.
      2. +1
        16 June 2017 09: 12
        You, my friend, caught on !? Where are those investigators who might ask impartially?
        And the question for adequately minded people - a thief or not a thief, is not worth it. And yet, yes, a thief, even with the name of Vasiliev, should be in prison, at least!
    2. 0
      15 June 2017 15: 11
      tse zrada chi tse not zrada? laughing
      I understand that you are not completely aware that the courts are guided exclusively by law?
    3. vch
      +5
      15 June 2017 15: 42
      So, after all, she stole not a loaf of bread in a store, but three billion! Now, if I had a loaf of bread, I would have spent two or three years from bell to bell ..... And so are the lawyers and the court is benevolent ......
      1. 0
        16 June 2017 04: 27
        But did she really steal, or so far they only “say” that she stole?
  2. 0
    15 June 2017 13: 52
    Again bast, start over.
  3. +26
    15 June 2017 13: 52
    [/ quote] The damage from her criminal actions, according to the investigation, exceeded 3 billion rubles. [quote]

    My neighbor spent 3 years for stealing a part worth 15000 rubles. The real term. And here 5 years, and then almost immediately came out on parole. Where is the rule of law? Where is the equality before him?
    Vova, what kind of chaos?
    1. +7
      15 June 2017 13: 55
      So we always have it - for a bag of potatoes from the field, the real time.
      And if the composition is communized, the maximum is 3 years probation.
      1. 0
        16 June 2017 04: 30
        If it’s proved that you stole a bag of potatoes and it’s not proved that you are 3 billion rubles. stole, then the way it is. Otherwise, Navalny begins to remind all of this very much - I said that Usmanov gave bribes to Medvedev, so it is, and if the court says that I did not prove it, then I’m not a liar, but a corrupt court ”
    2. 0
      15 June 2017 15: 12
      Well, when a person is almost equal to the law, how else?
      here is your neighbor who? to him to equal the law do you know how many such details had to be stolen?
  4. 0
    15 June 2017 14: 01
    They will stop, they will purge for another five years and close - after prescription, as it were.
  5. 0
    15 June 2017 14: 06
    Strength Zhenya. At the next trial, they also pay you for moral damage. Yes, you yourself will write a new book of poetry. Not everything is as bad as people think.
  6. 0
    15 June 2017 14: 24
    Vasilieva’s lawyer Hasan-Ali Borokov declined to comment on the progress of the investigation.


    The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation should be changed in such a way as to exclude the work of highly paid lawyers. Ordinary people imprisoned for "stolen ham" did not use these defenders. Therefore, monetary property law should not give privileges to specific individuals. Let them understand, like everyone else. Perhaps it’s not so "greyhound" will ...
    1. 0
      15 June 2017 15: 14
      and what claims to lawyers? a lawyer so that the rights of the person under investigation or the defendant are not violated. here are all the questions for the state prosecution and the court
  7. +4
    15 June 2017 14: 56
    Until Medvedev plows in Kolyma, nothing will happen to his wife’s sister !!!!! All this is an empty chatter of the defenders of the “Legal State”. For less theft, they spend a lot of time and TFR floods the ears of the investigation, they conduct yeah.
  8. +4
    15 June 2017 16: 58
    And 3 “lard”, as they used to say: “on an especially large scale”? Under the councils for the "especially large size" they gave the execution or 15 years of the "special" camps. A particularly large one started (I can be wrong) from 10 thousand rubles. For 10 thousand it was possible to buy a Volga, We can purely theoretically equate the Volga to that of today's Merin, and this, depending on the configuration, is up to 5-6 Lyamas. And then three billion and five years of which 2/3 in the kitchen of his native apartment stayed and immediately UDO! Yes... am
  9. +2
    15 June 2017 17: 00
    Santa Barbara - Series 2138.
  10. 0
    15 June 2017 17: 51
    That's the way to steal. He stayed at home and is free.
  11. +1
    15 June 2017 19: 25
    While investigating, she will die of old age - on silk sheets in mansions. She had to throw a bag of potatoes, they say they plant a potato bag quickly and for a long time.
  12. +1
    15 June 2017 23: 43
    In China, this lady would not have been ticked.
  13. Owl
    0
    16 June 2017 09: 03
    If you do not punish immediately - there will be no punishment. The main thing is the "roof" of the most important (as a relative of a friend), so Serdyuk is not on the "ration", but on the salary. The current government will never tighten penalties for those crimes in which it itself participates.