Russia hinted to the West who is now master of the sea

38
Is it true that launching a new generation of our surface ships for the Navy into the series will be a real revolution in the art of naval warfare? Why does Russia need an icebreaker the size of a destroyer or even a cruiser? When will the Russian fleet switch to the modular principle of building ships and operational-tactical attack formations? How can a minesweeper be turned into a rocket ship in a week, and then into an anti-submarine corvette or a patrol patrol? Is it true that the Americans managed to drop the Russian missile program on 10 years ago by eliminating the two leading specialists of our naval missiles?

38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    1 June 2017 11: 37
    Extremely silly headline. The number of American ships of the first rank is in the region of hundreds. Premier League - 55, not counting the strategists. Plus allies from the UK, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. The question "who is the master of the sea" is obvious and will not be called into question for a long time. request
    1. +4
      1 June 2017 16: 55
      Russia hinted to the West who is now master of the sea
      and who?... what
      1. +11
        2 June 2017 10: 26
        Who was the master, he remained ...
    2. +3
      2 June 2017 10: 39
      In the presence of current supersonic anti-ship missiles, the question of ships disappears ....
      1. 0
        8 June 2017 10: 42
        Well, if they found an absolute weapon against the ships, then the EXPENSIVE ships stopped building! So, is there ANYTHING against anti-ship missiles !?
    3. Maz
      +1
      6 June 2017 20: 37
      It's not about who is considered the master in the number of ships and boats, but who can really do all this Anglo-American-Australian-Zeeland-Canadian pack so that she does not even notice it at the nodal points of the ocean and coast that walks along the edge of the razor . And you just have to blow, send a signal or activate the device and a pile of floating, blind and uncontrolled Anglo-Saxon scrap metal will be plowed around the world’s oceans in the best case, if you don’t immediately go to the bottom to feed the fish. This is called "martial art" - used to be taught everywhere in schools.
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. +3
      1 June 2017 16: 56
      Quote from rudolf
      Rare nonsense. "The dream of reason gives birth to monsters!"

      it’s scary to imagine what gives rise to the absence thereof ...
    2. +4
      1 June 2017 17: 21
      The very idea of ​​modularity is not nonsense, and quite reasonable, there is nothing "fantastic" in it. There is only one small BUT a very important detail that everyone overlooks (including design engineers in a couple with the workers of the Moscow region). To implement "modularity" it is necessary to conduct a conceptual and technical analysis to understand what, where, how, why, and most importantly WHY to do.
      Well, here is the simplest element of such an analysis, "free feed“Why the hell did it two-level in the icebreaker-patrol tug of Project 23550? You can make one large aviation deck (UA) and push the modules inside it, and make sliding doors with a sealing system on top. Thus, we will increase the number of modules and expand the AP for landing larger helicopters.
      Well, or for example, I carried out the same conceptual and technical analysis of the ships of the Russian Navy, and here’s what I see: there is a list of projects of ships being built since 2000 21631, 22800, 20380, 11661, 22350, 11356 all of these ships will be useless in case of real war, especially the last two, during the war they will simply be destroyed, since they cannot be thrown along the inland rivers between the white, Baltic and black seas (or do you think that they will be allowed to cross the Atlantic?fool) At the same time, locks on the rivers of the Russian Federation, now allow you to transfer vessels 135m * 14,3m displacement from 5500t to 7500t, and this is a full-fledged frigate! but as always, those in charge "do not see the forests behind the trees", well, they don’t have time to collect and analyze information (this not sarcasm, there people are busy with other things), and there is no organization that would be engaged in analytics for the Moscow Region.
      In the meantime, all sorts of journalists and ANALYTICS (like the author of the video) will only give a damn about the water, but like parrots repeat the eternal "slogans", I especially liked the pearl about "minesweeping on modular ships" fool the author clearly does not understand what nonsense is ...
      1. +2
        2 June 2017 09: 11
        Everything is accurate, in general a simple analysis of the situation in the world shows that globally no one is going to attack anyone, the rulers at the top have agreed on everything, but then everyone in their own country conspires to hold people for sheep, rubbing them a threat and justifying another infusion of dough into such are the projects in the Navy, and in other troops, by analogy ... otherwise it is very difficult for a sane person, and even more so an engineer ... these are the products of the dreams of reason
        1. +1
          3 June 2017 03: 12
          Yes, no, they attack, and even how, it’s just that modern warfare is hybrid, i.e. war is going on not only in one military sphere, but also in the military-civil and civilian spheres. If earlier the state was destroyed in a couple of years of military aggression at a cost of 100 billion a year of expenditures, now it is destroyed in 10-50 years while making a profit ...
      2. +6
        2 June 2017 10: 53
        So it continues to be implemented 300-year-old Russian program "Illusion", recall the Potemkin villages ...
    3. 0
      2 June 2017 08: 18
      I agree. Bull's-eye!
  3. +10
    1 June 2017 12: 26
    Litter the brains of the average man with such headlines and expert “maybe” and “someday” ... and then the site branches are full of slogans-cheers! etc. True, today there is only one, the ONLY FORCE THAT DOES NOT ALLOW US TO DESTROY AND CROSS, THIS IS A Strategic Missile Forces. And it is she, this force that gives us time to rearm. Point.
    1. +3
      1 June 2017 16: 29
      This catamaran project was presented at a tender with a stool. In a series it will never go. The article is about nothing. You can become a king in the ocean only if you exceed the quality, but not the quantity, of 1 ships of rank. while Russia has no such ships request
    2. +6
      2 June 2017 10: 33
      .... and the inevitability of the Perimeter.
    3. +1
      3 June 2017 14: 53
      Quote: NEXUS
      And it is she, this force that gives us time to rearm. Point.

      This phrase is a hundred pluses!
  4. +9
    1 June 2017 12: 41
    The mistress of the seas and land (as well as the bowels of the earth) is planet Earth.
    And the heading is delusional, from the category of "hatred".
    Not when you do not need to underestimate the enemy.
  5. +9
    1 June 2017 15: 48
    The "photo and video" section of VO can be safely reduced. Make the site laugh
    1. +1
      1 June 2017 16: 37
      Quote: Tlauicol
      The "photo and video" section of VO can be safely reduced. Make the site laugh

      That's when the stories from RenTV appear, then that's it, the edge. smile
      1. +1
        1 June 2017 17: 25
        so it seems they already were, just a couple of weeks ago ... not clipping with RenTV but the same tales, aliens, superweapons, etc.
  6. +4
    1 June 2017 16: 51
    Russia hinted to the West who is now master of the sea And who? Is America really? I guessed no? tongue
  7. +1
    1 June 2017 17: 09
    The idea itself is important. We really need the modular principle of building ships. Now the main thing is the massive production of missile weapons. We need a wide variety of cruise missile carriers. And it can be absolutely optional only cruisers, frigates or submarines. Bold and unexpected decisions are possible. We are quite capable of taking control of the North Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea. This is exactly the path that will help us withstand the western naval armada. Otherwise, it will be difficult to protect the country. But scientists need to be protected.
    1. +7
      1 June 2017 19: 29
      Lord, what are you talking about? We will take control only of children's towns in urban areas. And it’s unlikely. We can only protect rivers from fishermen. We are quite capable of taking control of the North Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea. Your dreams, yes to God’s ears. We can’t. But we want. But the Wishlist hasn’t grown yet. We are still in its infancy, but here we go.
      1. 0
        4 June 2017 18: 08
        Here we must still remember Zircon.
  8. +1
    1 June 2017 21: 01
    Quote: VERESK
    Lord, what are you talking about? We will take control only of children's towns in urban areas. And it’s unlikely. We can only protect rivers from fishermen. We are quite capable of taking control of the North Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea. Your dreams, yes to God’s ears. We can’t. But we want. But the Wishlist hasn’t grown yet. We are still in its infancy, but here we go.

    An adult, and such a pessimist !!! Do not recognize you !!!
    - While we burn with freedom,
    - While hearts are alive for honor,
    - My friend, we will devote to the Fatherland
    - Souls are beautiful impulses!
    Chin up! And heather to relatives !!!
    1. +4
      1 June 2017 21: 21
      A pessimist. And in an armed conflict with the United States, it’s an optimist. There’s no reason for one war. Although we will tear it to pieces. Comments. We can do everything. We’ll put the whole world under the heel. We’re like that!
    2. +4
      5 June 2017 05: 37
      And heather to relatives !!! From heather, the drink was forgotten a long time ago ...
      1. +7
        7 June 2017 03: 08
        And he was sweeter than honey,
        Drunker than wine.
  9. +7
    2 June 2017 04: 10
    in another race he looked at this strange uncle with a beard and laughed heartily ... although then it became a little sad from the fact that many listen to him and believe ..... in my opinion he is a frank pest ....
  10. +1
    2 June 2017 05: 05
    Stupid bragging and primitive thinking!
  11. 0
    2 June 2017 08: 25
    Probably the next nonsense was needed for the next "cut" of budget funds by faithful minions of the Moscow Region. For ill-conceived decisions in the development of weapons and military equipment, they also give heroes (after all, cashing out 50-70% of the state order is a heroic business). A man for a bag of grain - for 5 years on a bunk.
  12. +1
    2 June 2017 11: 55
    Just stupid, I don’t even want to comment on such nonsense.
  13. 0
    2 June 2017 15: 47
    What the hell boats, which sailors? All this is empty, except for one thing - that shipbuilders' jobs “okay” ... 21st century already, long ago, all submariners on submarines and rocket armaments have been deciding - and they are combing us about boats !? Fortunately, there are jobs for shipbuilders, and in the stolnoye - a waste of our taxes, a show of strength to wild tribes! Only breakthrough technologies in rocket science, aviation, and nuclear submarines can truly give a kick!
  14. +1
    3 June 2017 17: 27
    Clown and balabol. It is enough to look at the surroundings in which this "expert" speaks. And this crap spread in the "IN"? Well, come! Are there no normal specialists? )))
    1. 0
      6 June 2017 19: 07
      Lucky. I didn’t have the patience to even watch
  15. 0
    4 June 2017 18: 04
    I haven’t even read the comments yet. What have the Americans done there? Your engine? They are still buying ours!
    1. +4
      5 June 2017 05: 34
      What are they buying from us? Ship engines? We ourselves do not have them yet. Something is not clear. Is it possible in more detail? Do not refer to the taxiway. There’s another topic.