Beijing or Washington? Who will be the master in the South China Sea

13
The United States again began to aggravate relations with China. The next episode was the invasion of the American destroyer into the territorial waters of the PRC. We are talking about the incident near the Spratlys Archipelago (Nansha) in the South China Sea. Let's think about what caused this demonstrative game on the nerves of Beijing, arranged by the Americans, what scenarios can be expected, and how it will come around in our country.

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    26 May 2017 07: 54
    the Chinese have big enough eggs to ram American ships))
  2. +1
    26 May 2017 15: 22
    not suitable for life and claim 6 countries.
    Is the New Earth suitable? who claims to be the NSR?
    1. +10
      26 May 2017 17: 32
      As a result of climate warming in the northern hemisphere, from the second half of the 19th century, Norwegian industrialists began to conduct fisheries off the coast of Novaya Zemlya. Researchers from different countries became interested in the archipelago again. Therefore, by the beginning of the seventies of the XIX century, the need for the settlement of Novaya Zemlya by Russian citizens became apparent.
      In 1872, several Nenets families moved to Novaya Zemlya for permanent residence. In 1877, the camp Malye Karmakuly was organized, where, by order of the administration, 6 Nenets families in the number of 24 people were resettled. Starting from 1880, regular shipping flights from Arkhangelsk to Malye Karmakuly have been established. In 1889, in Maly Karmakuli, the Nicholas-Karelian monastery, with the permission of the Holy Synod, a monastic monastery was established. The task of the monks included not only preaching among the Nenets, but also help in changing the existing way of life during the transition from nomadic to sedentary life.
      By 1894, the permanent population of Novaya Zemlya was 10 families of Nenets in the number of 50 people. By 1910, as a result of Russia's colonization of the archipelago, the Norwegian government finally abandoned claims to these lands and prohibited its subjects from fishing off the coast of Novaya Zemlya. By 1920, the population of the New Earth population reached 209 people (75% - Nenets, 25% - Russian immigrants). This population was concentrated in four villages: Malye Karmakuly (1877), Matochkin Shar (1888), Belushya Guba (1897), Olginsky (1910). At the beginning of the 20's, 2 annual flights from Arkhangelsk to Novaya Zemlya were introduced. In 1924, elections were held for the New Earth Council. Tyko Vylka, who remained in this post until 1956, became its chairman. Several more settlements were founded: Arkhangelsk Bay - r.O. Pankratieva (1932), Krasino - Bay Black (1925), Lagernoye - etc. Matochkin Shar (1932), Russian Harbor (1932), Rusanovo (1932), Smidovich ( 1930). By 1932, the population of Novaya Zemlya was 312 people (193 Russians and 119 Nenets).
      In 1956, the entire civilian population voluntarily forced to move to the mainland, and the archipelago becomes a closed zone - a testing ground for nuclear testing. Economic activity in its former forms and framework ceases.

      He was in all without exception the above camps and villages - quite suitable for living places and very beautiful, but there is not enough regular communication with the mainland (but this, of course, if you do not take military activity into account).
      1. +1
        26 May 2017 23: 22
        thanks for the enlightenment.
        I'm talking about the principle --- Is Franz Joseph fit for life?
        1. +10
          27 May 2017 11: 11
          I have not been to the ZFI. These places are actually inaccessible. This is already for polar stations, limited military facilities (bases), as a last resort for shift workers - but not for immigrants from the mainland and housekeeping.
  3. +3
    26 May 2017 16: 29
    China gave an unambiguous answer:
    The other day, the Chinese side expressed its dissatisfaction with the actions of the American fleet in the South China Sea. Beijing warned the United States that the White House risks seriously undermining negotiations between stakeholders. The statement came after the US Navy destroyer Dewey marched 12 nautical miles from an artificial island built by China in the disputed waters of the Spratly Archipelago. Moreover, China called on the United States to "correct the mistake and refrain from further patrolling in the area." And Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang even warned that “such maneuvers can lead to unexpected disasters at sea and in the air " . Until recently, such behavior would have been considered an unprecedented audacity - to dare to express dissatisfaction with the presence of an American warship, and even threaten “catastrophes”! However, this gesture of Beijing was not without foundation. And there are at least two of them: these are our own naval forces, confidently taking their place in the oceans, and also the far from brilliant state of the rival’s fleet, that is, the United States.
  4. +4
    26 May 2017 16: 37
    Beijing or Washington? Who will be the master in the South China Sea Who knows ... Years through 20-Russia.
  5. 0
    27 May 2017 01: 37
    Beijing or Washington? Who will be the master in the South China Sea

    Whoever further will be from Un and his missiles will be the master (as he will think that the master) ....
  6. +1
    27 May 2017 01: 43
    If there appears an analogue of the ATS in the APR, then not on the basis of the BRICS, but on the basis of either the SCO or the Collective Security Treaty Organization (which the PRC can enter) ....
    1. +1
      28 May 2017 16: 25
      SCO and BRICS - economic structures. CSTO is quite possible ... although this alliance is larger for the CIS countries.

      It is even possible there will be a different structure, and it will appear only after a real mess. And the mess is likely to be with NATO.

      And the union will be called type: Eurasian collective security zone.
      1. +1
        28 May 2017 16: 36
        and it will appear only after a real mess.

        The United States has long nurtured plans to create an analogue of NATO in the Asia-Pacific region, and after that we will create an analogue of the ATS ...
        And the new NATO in the Asia-Pacific region will most likely be created on the basis of ANZUS, which includes USA...
  7. 0
    31 May 2017 21: 03
    the main goal of Russia, the United States and China to destroy the communist regime of Un. Communists and fascists brothers.
    1. 0
      31 May 2017 21: 23
      Quote: boicko.anat
      the main goal of Russia, the United States and China to destroy the communist regime of Un. Communists and fascists brothers.

      A country that understands the Russian Federation, its friend, and the Russian Federation always did not give a damn (unlike the rest of "progressive humanity") what kind of regime its friends had ...