"Over 2300 modern tanks will go to the troops in the next 10 years"

58
"Over 2300 modern tanks will go to the troops in the next 10 years"


Uralvagonzavod - the only manufacturer of armored vehicles in Russia - will always be in demand by the country. This is once again confirmed by the article “To be strong: guarantees of national security for Russia,” published by the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin.

According to the Prime Minister, “the task of the coming decade is to enable the new structure of the Armed Forces to rely on fundamentally new equipment. It shoots more precisely at a technique that “sees” further, reacts faster than similar systems of any potential adversary. ”

In the very near future - by 2013 - Uralvagonzavod will present a fundamentally new combat vehicle; two years later it is planned to change the whole tank the lineup. A universal combat platform will be created on which all types of weapons associated with tracked vehicles will be placed. And the new machine, created taking into account all the requirements of the Ministry of Defense, of course, must be in demand by the state. “Over the next decade, more than 2300 modern tanks will enter the troops,” the article says.

The state support of the army and the military-industrial complex was also announced: “We have adopted and are implementing unprecedented programs for the development of the Armed Forces and for the modernization of the defense-industrial complex of Russia. In total, in the coming decade, about 23 trillion rubles will be allocated for these purposes. ” The funds will go to the development of Uralvagonzavod. Vladimir Putin is convinced: “no“ point ”purchase of military equipment and equipment can replace our production of our own types of weapons, but can only serve as a basis for obtaining technology and knowledge ... I want to emphasize once again - we will focus on re-equipping the Russian military-industrial complex and our scientific base. "

Therefore, Vladimir Putin draws particular attention to the need for a large-scale modernization of the defense-industrial complex: “The defense industry is our pride, here is concentrated the most powerful intellectual and scientific and technical potential. But we must speak directly about the accumulated problems. In fact, over the past 30 years, domestic defense centers and enterprises have missed several cycles of modernization. Over the coming decade, we must fully make up this gap. " Today, Uralvagonzavod has already begun to implement this task: large-scale technical re-equipment of the existing production is in full swing at the enterprises of the corporation to produce better and more competitive products.

Uralvagonzavod will live and develop - its modernization potential and new promising developments are necessary for the Russian Army.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    22 February 2012 10: 29
    God forbid !!!
    1. Sergh
      +7
      22 February 2012 10: 44
      Well, as I myself know, the modernization of the enterprise has never been done in a year. It will be gradual, within three to five, and maybe more years. Yes, and this must be done, because quickly it does not happen well. New machines and facilities, it’s not two fingers ... years will pass until they master. But this topic is happy, we need progress!
      1. Regul
        +4
        22 February 2012 11: 09
        Quote: Sergh
        It will be gradual, within three to five, and maybe more years.

        The main thing here is to start, you look there and something worthwhile will come out. We often start some projects and freeze them, let's hope that this process comes to its logical conclusion and not only at this enterprise.
    2. Dimitrxnumx
      +1
      22 February 2012 11: 43
      At the enterprises of the corporation, large-scale technical re-equipment of existing production is in full swing to produce better and more competitive products. - Right balm for the soul.
  2. +1
    22 February 2012 10: 31
    Again hatred ... well, it won’t work out in a year ..- two ... they won’t be able to create so many enterprises to provide all the necessary things to the Uralvagon .. Like a dream, charm .. In the meantime, we’ll just upgrade the conventional tank fleet ... Materials and accessories at the level of the best foreign samples ... but they are not yet ...
    1. +2
      22 February 2012 10: 46
      This is not possible with us. Here I recommend reading. The mood will rise. I guarantee.
      http://lib.ru/WELLER/seaparad.txt
    2. Nymp
      0
      22 February 2012 10: 47
      Well, what if it works !? Remember what the skeptics said when the construction of BAM began ... wink
      1. +5
        22 February 2012 11: 03
        The problem is that there are too many skeptics, and many still consider themselves experts!
        1. +1
          22 February 2012 11: 50
          And moreover, without doing anything they discourage (persuade) what else to do.
        2. Nymp
          +1
          22 February 2012 12: 32
          Quote: Chuck-Norris
          The problem is that there are too many skeptics, and many still consider themselves experts!

          Yes, we need a breakthrough and doubt here - a bad companion!
      2. Dimitrxnumx
        0
        22 February 2012 11: 45
        In general, brilliant prospects will open if we create the most powerful weapons at our modernized research and production complex, both domestically and abroad. If only the sticks from under the wheels were removed on time!
        1. karla
          0
          22 February 2012 12: 02
          Quote: Dimitr77
          powerful weapons, in its modernized research and production complex, both domestically and abroad

          It remains only to add nanotechnology, and then it is possible also abroad, only for which abroad?
  3. Sarus
    +2
    22 February 2012 10: 36
    If finances flow, then equipment upgrades are possible ...
    1. +1
      22 February 2012 10: 48
      Maybe everything .. just not by the magic wand ... It takes time and personnel .. And this does not give Putin .. Principle-I gave money and everything worked well only among the janitors, but something with panicles .. Mechanized He will prepare the equipment ... And the plant, especially the aviation industry, is a very complicated production, with the best engineers and workers ... It’s one thing to assemble a caterpillar, another to shoot at night ... So the tanks will still be old, with new sights ...
      1. karla
        +1
        22 February 2012 12: 24
        Quote: domokl
        Everything is possible .. just not by the magic wand ... It takes time and personnel.

        A production culture, skilled workers (!!!), engineers, designers cannot be created in one day, month or year. It’s not even a matter of salary (although this is not a little) Growing a team is not easy. First of all - the prestige of the working profession and the place of work, this begins. The technological discipline in the tight depends on the responsibility of everyone from worker to engineer. Development and prototype is 30% success. Introduction into production is the main thing. Product improvement is only with tight cooperation between design bureaus and the factory (after army tests). Do these conditions exist? Of course not. More precisely, they exist, but not in order to release in the next five years something fundamentally new, with the introduction of troops, as the final product. The term of 7-8 years is more real. If the conversation is about the tank. With regard to more technical weapons (communications, radars, ships and planes), only according to official statements, the gap is 10-15 years. I think that it’s simply not realistic to catch up (without putting all the strength and headstock on the altar of victory) as it will affect the standard of living in the Russian Federation and whether the people will be ready to make such sacrifices in the absence of a clear enemy - the question.
        1. -2
          22 February 2012 21: 15
          The "song" about production difficulties is, of course, pitiful, but not very convincing. If you give SPECIFIC terms of 7-8 years (for a tank), justify them already, without emotional retrospectives. Well, for example - what are the preliminary design terms and why, how much time do you release on the technical assignment and why, and how much time for the technical design? What difficulties do you see at the RP stage? What's holding back? Well, evaluate at least approximately the current level of development of the tank and at what stage it is. Even without economic assessments. And so - one tearful chatter. Uninteresting.
          1. karla
            -1
            23 February 2012 09: 12
            ikrut,
            Quote: ikrut
            If you give SPECIFIC terms of 7-8 years (per tank) - justify them already, without emotional retrospectives. Well, for example - what are the timelines for conceptual design and why, how much time do you release on the technical task, and why, and how much on the technical specifications? What difficulties do you see at the stage of RP? What is holding up? Well, evaluate at least about the real level of development of the tank and at what stage it is. Even without economic evaluations. And so - one tear talk. Uninteresting.

            http://armor.kiev.ua/Tanks/Modern/T64/history.php
            And this is in Soviet times, when the whole industry worked for defense. From the initial idea to the final exit from the factory, the t-64 took 13 years. I am still very optimistic. Gave half of this period.
    2. Nymp
      +1
      22 February 2012 10: 49
      Yes! And recently, finances have been allocated not small.
    3. karla
      -3
      22 February 2012 12: 04
      Quote: Sarus
      If finances flow, then equipment upgrades are possible ...

      Finance can not flow Saw and chop only solid.
  4. DEATH UWB
    +1
    22 February 2012 10: 38
    AND US AND EVEN OLD MACHINES WHICH CAN

    http://otvaga2004.narod.ru/publ_w2/tanki.htm
    1. Tnadzor
      -4
      22 February 2012 11: 14
      They can’t do anything! They won’t accept it for scrap! Stop living in the Stone Age! We must learn to make such tanks so that it is not a shame before the world, the times of the T-34 have sunk into oblivion!
  5. PISTOL
    +4
    22 February 2012 10: 38
    The ground forces certainly need to be updated, it would be good if this happened in the next 10 years!
    1. 0
      22 February 2012 10: 49
      This is the real term ... 5-10 years is quite normal for the restoration and development of enterprises ...
  6. +6
    22 February 2012 10: 42
    we need to learn how to throw off old equipment to third countries and replace our army with new cars
    1. Nymp
      +1
      22 February 2012 10: 54
      Well, yes, the Yankees have been doing this for a long time! It will only have to forever produce components for third countries, which will not allow to completely modernize the military industry! But if it brings tremendous profit, then I am for!
      1. alex popov
        0
        22 February 2012 11: 14
        This is the right move. Instead of handing them over at the price of scrap metal, selling them to third countries. Naturally, podshamaniv a little, bringing to mind.
        As for the maintenance of such tanks, this is generally a bonanza!
        By the way, I could be wrong here, but at one time they planned to create fortified areas on the DVT from the old 55oks and 64oks, bury them in the ground ...
        To write off old tanks for scrap is the top of waste.
        1. 0
          26 February 2012 14: 27
          I think we don’t live in North Korea to bury very ancient tanks in the ground and chained the crew in chains so that they don’t run away. Technique should be primarily modern from the old one. If you can get rid of resources immediately, it will take more to say nothing about nerves.
      2. Regul
        +1
        22 February 2012 11: 20
        And it’s wonderful that there will be demand, these are additional jobs, profits for which it will be possible to modernize and again develop something perfect weapons and military equipment.
        1. +1
          22 February 2012 11: 59
          At the same time, get rid of the junk rusting in storage. And money. The main thing to vtyuhut someone thread. Because for example, the T-55 has long been irrelevant for our army.
  7. 12061973
    +1
    22 February 2012 10: 43
    before the election, everyone is already tired of saying that. It’s interesting what the name of the Russian modern tank is, what generation it has, more than 230 pieces a year.
    1. Nymp
      0
      22 February 2012 10: 58
      I can only agree with you that the information is not enough! But can it be for the better? Do Americans share their plans in the military industry? They will also let the fog - God forbid! ..
      1. 12061973
        0
        22 February 2012 11: 08
        but with a leopard, after all, it is necessary to compare at a price, too.
  8. 0
    22 February 2012 10: 50
    That’s it, I don’t believe it! Be sure to find out everything that is being done with Almaz-Antey, producer of C-400 and C-500 !!! We dispersed the best specialists, the salary of 12000 rubles, hired assemblers from GAZ to manufacture air defense! But the director showed the mansion on TV, such that it was probably no worse than Prokhorovsky.
    Blast furnaces have been stopped at Almaz-Antey, shops of the "reconstructed" type, personnel are confused. Interviews with former designers of the plant are simply overwhelming.
    1. +2
      22 February 2012 11: 00
      With which particular company from the holding ?? There are 50 of them there, and C-500 is still not produced by anyone, in the absence of the latter.
    2. Tnadzor
      +2
      22 February 2012 11: 20
      Absolutely right! And so everywhere, at all enterprises of the military-industrial complex, what novelties can we talk about? Do not do it to anyone!
      1. +1
        22 February 2012 12: 00
        I would say not only with defense industry enterprises, but with the whole country. Unfortunately.
    3. Don
      0
      22 February 2012 12: 18
      Quote: Magadan
      Blast furnaces stopped at Almaz-Antey

      This is at what plant Almaz-Antey there are blast furnaces do not tell me? Blast furnaces are located at metallurgical plants. As far as I know, metallurgical plants are not part of the Almaz-Antey concern.
      Quote: Magadan
      salary 12000 rubles

      What are the best specialists? Leading engineers? I doubt it very much. If in an ordinary industrial design bureau in St. Petersburg, a Design Engineer of category III (young specialist) has a salary of 28000.
  9. Dimoll
    0
    22 February 2012 10: 50
    I agree, 230 a year will not master !!!
  10. Regul
    +1
    22 February 2012 11: 12
    I want to emphasize once again - we will be betting on the rearmament of the Army precisely on the Russian defense industry and our scientific base

    This trend is very correct. It is only necessary to remove the excess talkers, who like Western weapons more and will be absolutely wonderful.
    1. +2
      22 February 2012 11: 33
      it would be nice to get rid of those few who at the state level accept solutions on the purchase of imported weapons (mistral, etc.) wink
      By the way, who could it be? ... feel
      1. 0
        22 February 2012 12: 01
        In general, it's time to put the Minister of War.
        1. prunx
          0
          22 February 2012 12: 59
          Hauptmann Emil, well, that is not for you to decide!
      2. 0
        22 February 2012 12: 53
        by the way ... request here's another batch of "frogs" recourse
        http://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/news/1510709/6_mlrd_konkurentu#ixzz1n4onxUUD
      3. prunx
        -2
        22 February 2012 13: 11
        We need new technologies, which our science and industry are not yet able to create for objective reasons. It is unreasonable to wait with "bare butt" when ours will be created. Therefore, temporarily, it is necessary to purchase from foreigners. By the way, the Chinese went exactly this way, and my opponents praise them and urge them to follow the Heavenly Empire in everything, and they scold ours. Idiocy.
  11. Fuck_usa
    +1
    22 February 2012 11: 18
    Time will tell.
  12. F751
    +1
    22 February 2012 11: 35
    Fuck_usa,
    Exactly, unless it’s pre-election la-la.
    1. +2
      22 February 2012 12: 02
      I really hope for it.
  13. -1
    22 February 2012 11: 47
    Of course, I understand that the elections and all that, but so much POSITIVE news, is it really a trend or just Putin’s next promises?
    1. -5
      22 February 2012 11: 50
      this is the "promise trend" wink
    2. Nymp
      +3
      22 February 2012 11: 57
      I do not agree with this assessment! I do not like when they run into without specifics! Putin promised you a couple of thousand for a salary? Not? Well, so much hostility? Or do you still have deep faith in a good king-priest? 1 Believe me, nothing personal! And even there is no desire to offend.
  14. elfxnumx
    -8
    22 February 2012 11: 52
    it’s a shame that having a loot for 2300 tanks, Russia does not have money to repair roofs for kindergartens and to heat schools in which children in boots and mittens in the winter in winter ...
    the option with tanks was already and it was called the USSR ... maybe it’s time to think about an alternative to throwing dough into the thousandth hordes of tanks and remember the people?
    1. Nymp
      +3
      22 February 2012 12: 06
      If you do not allocate money for tanks and missiles, then Russia will not have money for "roofs" at all (and our equipment is already so outdated that even this money is not enough) Russia will be shattered into pieces, the right to use raw materials will be taken away (And there is darkness for those who wish) and then certainly not to see kindergartens, schools and other social programs
      1. 0
        22 February 2012 12: 36
        maybe ... Yes but if you neglect the social sphere, then by the time of the victorious completion of the rearmament programs there will be no one to defend ... recourse
    2. RUSSIA75
      +3
      22 February 2012 12: 49
      "Loot" is not thrown away, but invested in the country's defense! If you don't want your tanks, you will meet strangers on your street with bread and salt! And money for kindergartens and schools is allocated, not as much as we would like, but still! Another thing is how they are distributed locally by local officials responsible for this! The paradox is that new kindergartens and schools are being built in one constituent entity of the Federation, and hell in another. That's what prablam is!
  15. wk
    +1
    22 February 2012 12: 05
    and they put a cross at the Omsk plant? ... yes, and what about the achievement of 200 tanks a year? ... over 4 years of war, more than 50 were built ... in modern conditions Russia needs at least 000 vehicles, and the plant in Omsk would not be superfluous, and the 20k platform is more perfect than the 000nd, and subject to the adoption of a modern diesel engine to it, as is done in Kharkov, the new tank would far overtake 80 tons ... but the UVZ management stubbornly lobbies the outdated platform by all means (ordered articles) vilifies the Ukrainian "Oplot" which far surpassed the T72,
    1. -3
      22 February 2012 17: 21
      Quote: wk
      yes, and what an achievement of 200 tanks a year

      Although the figure is underestimated, but UVZ riveted its 72s faster and in much larger volumes.
      The serial plant is the same. I think no one needs to explain here what it means to readjust serial production?
      Yes, it's easier to build a new one!
      Hence the T-90, half old (bottom), half new (top). Cost minimization.
    2. 0
      22 February 2012 17: 33
      200 tanks a year are few and 2300 tanks throughout Russia are also few, given the dimensions of our country and the army of neighboring states. This number of tanks is not enough to repel external threats.
      1. -1
        22 February 2012 17: 46
        Quote: Grenader
        and 2300 tanks throughout Russia are also few

        God forbid!
        Well, only the General Staff knows for sure, but a crude general figure sounded on the network: about ten thousand cars. Slightly smaller than the T-72 and a larger T-80. 72s, turning into 90s, will rise to the level of 80k and Russia will not have the smallest tank fleet.
        We can say that it is not so modern, but also not inferior to others in either number or weapons.
  16. +1
    22 February 2012 12: 17
    Apparently it will be upgraded T-72 to version T-90 .... Well, well, at least let it be so ... winked
  17. 0
    22 February 2012 12: 36
    About "Armata" and "Kurganets-25" from a neighboring topic
    http://topwar.ru/8593-armata-i-kurganec-25.html
  18. boris.radevitch
    -3
    22 February 2012 12: 57
    It’s time, and then the inheritance from the USSR remained 55 and the new 72 for
    the border!
    1. 0
      22 February 2012 17: 24
      Quote: boris.radevitch
      one 55 and the new 72 for

      There were 72 and 80 left, the 90s began to arrive.

      PS Where infa on the 55th? And heard about the T-62?
  19. Dmitry.V
    0
    22 February 2012 13: 10
    Looking at the latest news with the supply of weapons, it was not by chance that someone from the leadership looked at the "Military Review"?
  20. Phoenixl
    +1
    22 February 2012 13: 10
    The main thing before the election is to make promises to vote, and until 2020 it will be possible to invent a bunch of excuses. Crisis for example)
  21. +2
    22 February 2012 13: 18
    although these are campaign words, God forbid they come true at least 50%
  22. +1
    22 February 2012 13: 28
    by the way, http://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/news/1510709/6_mlrd_konkurentu#ixzz1n4onxUUD
    The sentence especially touches: "... this will allow these helicopters to be brought in past the monopoly state intermediary - Rosoboronexport lol
    the truth is somewhere near...
  23. mongol-79
    +1
    22 February 2012 13: 44
    In the pre-election period, you can say a bunch of beautiful words for a percentage increase in the electorate, but when it comes to the country's defense, you need to be more careful in promises, these are serious topics, I want to live in a state with a strong army and navy, feel protected. So let's hope that not just words.
  24. dred
    0
    22 February 2012 14: 10
    Glad for such news. Here they come true.
    1. 0
      22 February 2012 17: 26
      Quote: dred
      Glad for such news. Here they come true.

      Why not ?
      Just indicated the number of military troops T-72.
  25. 0
    3 June 2012 16: 40
    ikrut,
    Quote: ikrut
    The "song" about production difficulties is, of course, pitiful, but not very convincing. If you give SPECIFIC terms of 7-8 years (for a tank), justify them already, without emotional retrospectives. And so - one tearful chatter. Uninteresting.

    I'm from Chelyabinsk. Not Tagil, of course, but in the tank business too - he steers. Rather, taxied ... When I was in school, I was a CNC machine operator (1990). There were three of us in the class, 5 at school. He had then 5 (!) Rank. None of us went to the factory. I suspect that no one in the city ... Here are the production difficulties for you: WHO WILL WORK?