Russian "Flurry" has covered NATO

13 May 2017 17

Is it true that our squall missile is not capable of hitting NATO’s naval targets?

17 comments

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

APASUS

+4

13 May 2017 18: 21

Military Review ● Photos and videos ● Video
Russian "Flurry" has covered NATO

Today, 18: 08
Is it true that our squall missile is not capable of hitting NATO’s naval targets?

It's all? What we are discussing here, I still do not understand, this proposal ...........
1. sabakina
  
  +6
  
  13 May 2017 18: 29
  
  Quote: APASUS
  APASUS
  
  I'm shocked myself! This is something from the category:
  1. You Vlad
    
    0
    
    13 May 2017 18: 56
    
    One of my favorite films, with humor, everything is fine.
2. Armata
  
  +1
  
  13 May 2017 21: 28
  
  Quote: APASUS
  It's all? What we are discussing here I did not understand, this proposal ..
  
  And where is the article, photo, video? A flurry of course can hit any target, but I do not see information about it.
3. Herat
  
  0
  
  14 May 2017 10: 31
  
  in the ministry of truth completely fucked up.
thinker

+3

13 May 2017 19: 53

Well, let's help
1. Chernobrov's eyebrows
  
  +1
  
  14 May 2017 11: 34
  
  Such an intrigue, and you are here with your spoiler!
  Vban-vban-vban-vban-vban .........................
Disorder

+1

13 May 2017 19: 56

Shaw smoked the author of the article?
Brezhnev's eyebrows

+1

13 May 2017 20: 26

Informatively!
HEATHER

+5

13 May 2017 20: 41

Cool post! Will we discuss it? I need intellect here. And I have problems with it. (He stomped for beer.)
Unclean

+1

13 May 2017 21: 21

What was that?
Navigator Basov

+1

13 May 2017 22: 02
I do not know. I am not a sailor.

I remembered something.
Andrey Kakoyto

0

14 May 2017 13: 15

Guys, stop trolling !? This is not a questionnaire for you?
Tai

0

14 May 2017 14: 15

A flurry is only secret crap that even articles about it are for official use only?)))
dog

0

14 May 2017 15: 38

M-yeah ... really. Judging by the comments: “Not everyone can watch this news. Or rather, not only everyone can watch, few can do it” (c)
Meteor

0

15 May 2017 15: 57

I just read an advertisement hoping to find this offer)
Mosquito

0

15 May 2017 17: 10

A good provocative question is that the most dangerous enemy of Man is his "naivety" !! ... (translated into Russian; - stupidity)

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"