Military Review

In Peru, the AMR 156 Pisco helicopter dock was launched

32
According to the blog bmpd, 25 On April 2017, the ceremony of launching and christening the landing amphibious assault ship AMR 156 Pisco under construction for the Peru Navy took place. This event was held at the enterprise of the Peruvian naval shipbuilding and ship repair association Servicio Industrial de la Marina de Guerra del Perú (SIMA) in Callao (SIMA Callao). Officially, the ship is classified as a "multipurpose ship" - Buque Multipropósito.



The ship is being built by SIMA under the project and with the assistance of the South Korean corporation Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME) under a contract worth approximately $ 60 million. The ship is a further development of the Makassar-class amphibious assault dock ships built by DSME for Indonesia. It was planned to hand over two ships to the Peruvian Navy in 2015, but it was not possible to meet this deadline, since the actual construction was started only in the second half of 2014. Delivery of Pisco the fleet Now expected in August 2018. The contract for the construction of the second Paita ship has not yet been concluded.

Ships of this type are relatively small in size - the standard displacement is 7300 tons, and the total displacement is 11390 tons. The ship is 122 meters long, 22 meters wide and has a draft of 4,9 meters. The power plant consists of two MAN B&W 9L28 / 32A diesel engines with 3000 hp each, providing a speed of up to 16,5 knots. The cruising range is up to 14 thousand miles.

Two 23-meter landing craft LCU type are placed in a small docking chamber, and on the cargo deck up to 14 armored vehicles of the LAV II armored personnel carrier class. The ship has a flight deck with two landing pads for Sikorsky UH-3 / SH-3D class helicopters and a hangar for the permanent deployment of one such helicopter. The ship contains 157 crewmen (including 14 officers and personnel) and up to 400 marines. It is possible to use the ship as a supply vessel. In this case, it is designed for loading 636 tons of fuel, 600 tons of water, 360 cubic meters of dry goods and 136 cubic meters of food.

It is assumed that the armament will be represented by one 40-mm anti-aircraft artillery unit BAE Systems Mk 4, two Israeli 30-mm remote-controlled artillery units Rafael Typhoon and four 12,7-mm remote units Rafael Mini Typhoon.

Photos used:
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/2572812.html
32 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Holoy
    Holoy April 27 2017 10: 17
    +3
    The Navy of Peru also has a Cruiser ... as well as the Navy of Peru No. 2 in Latin America after Chile ...
    1. tiredwithall
      tiredwithall April 27 2017 11: 46
      0
      No way the colony decided to start a colonial war to acquire colonies.
      1. cost
        cost April 27 2017 16: 33
        +1
        Helicopter docking ship launched in Peru

        Why do they need him? Such a dock is more relevant for Belarus in the area of ​​the Pinsk water junction. As a base of landing and missile boats
  2. ICT
    ICT April 27 2017 10: 29
    +2
    Quote: Holoy
    after Chile ...

    well, so they’re just messing with them
  3. yehat
    yehat April 27 2017 10: 33
    +2
    in fact, this is not a helicopter carrier, but transport with 1 helicopter.
    I wonder how much more is the requirement for a full-fledged paratrooper helicopter?
    Well, I won’t take American uosp, because it is the largest, but if on the example of Koreans and French?
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 April 27 2017 12: 41
      +2
      With 5 light or 2 heavy in hangar or 4 heavy with deck-based overload or 3 heavy with deck-based and the ability to use 2 take-off areas.
  4. jovanni
    jovanni April 27 2017 10: 42
    +8
    It's cool: Inca corals are building on their own, but we can't. I had to turn to the French ...
    1. A1845
      A1845 April 27 2017 11: 45
      0
      Quote: Jovanni
      build for ourselves, but we can’t

      Not certainly in that way
      under the project and with the assistance of the South Korean corporation Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering

      with such assistance, any country that you want to build yourself
      the Mistrals were also from there, too
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 April 27 2017 12: 48
        +3
        No 3 times:
        1) Mistral is the brainchild of DCNS, it's just that they are built at the Saint-Nazaire shipyard - 66% of which belongs to the Korean STX since 2008 of the year. That is, the French project is being built at a Korean shipyard in France!
        2) This is an extremely successful project based on civil technology. The essence of this project was simple to put in 50mln dollars - a full-fledged DKVD. And sell it around the world. And the most interesting thing is that this project is not of Koreans (well, rather, an order for it), but of Indonesians, where ships are being built in Surabaya (6 buildings were built).
        3) The Peruvians are the most wrapped. They overpaid (they got for the homeless a complete set of 130 million dollars = 2 DKVD, for example Tarlaki - localization under the Philippines cost 98 million dollars in the best configuration), but they set the condition that both ships should be built at the SIMA shipyard in Calao. The shipyard was substantially equipped for this business, and key technologies were obtained. However, there is a downside! Not only did the Peruvians overpay, but they also delayed - for example, at 1,5 years later, the Filipinos who signed Tarlac were already included in the Navy, and the second was running on trials.
        1. A1845
          A1845 April 27 2017 14: 36
          +1
          Quote: donavi49
          The shipyard was substantially equipped for this business, and key technologies were obtained.

          I wonder if they will have exhaust from this?
          our scam with the Mistrals was also presented as the need to master the technology of large-block assembly, there were victorious reports on the topic - and the money was returned and the technology was mastered, and then silence ..
  5. borov
    borov April 27 2017 10: 47
    +2
    Soon we will buy ships from Peru ...
  6. tomket
    tomket April 27 2017 11: 02
    +6
    Even Peru is letting something down there, and only here they declare and promise))))
    1. KaPToC
      KaPToC April 27 2017 12: 31
      0
      Quote: tomket
      Even Peru is letting something down there, and only here they declare and promise))))

      We have Ivan Gren launched a long time ago. Launched and transferred to the fleet - not synonyms.
      1. Div Divich
        Div Divich April 27 2017 21: 02
        0
        There is only one thing but, it is designed for the technology of the war of 1960, for a head-on collision with the enemy. BMP vs. BMP, hand-to-hand combat, search for submarines using a helicopter during unloading of a ship, or fire support of a landing by machine-gunners sitting in a helicopter ...

        And the rest of the countries, even the smallest ones, seek to destroy the enemy remotely, by artillery, aircraft ... Ivan Gren has no chance to win alone, and when using different types of equipment all his functions for a head-on collision become unnecessary, it makes sense like an ordinary cargo ship .
        1. KaPToC
          KaPToC April 27 2017 21: 56
          0
          Quote: Divan Divanych
          There is only one thing but, it is designed for the technology of the war of 1960, for a head-on collision with the enemy. BMP vs. BMP, hand-to-hand combat, search for submarines using a helicopter during unloading of a ship, or fire support of a landing by machine-gunners sitting in a helicopter ...

          It’s not so fast, it’s about a landing ship and all this it can’t do, it just carries people and armored vehicles and differs from transport only in its ability to land on an un-equipped coast.
          Quote: Divan Divanych
          Ivan Gren has no chance to win alone

          Who are you going to defeat the landing ship? He does not win, he carries.
          1. Div Divich
            Div Divich April 27 2017 22: 46
            0
            Tell this to the developers of the ship, who made a bow ramp in it for accelerated unloading of amphibious landing troops to engage in battle on the shore.

            I like Karel Doorman more than it, in addition to transporting equipment and cargo, it has the function of refueling ships, and also carries cargo containers on the take-off platform. He has no dock in the stern, this is, in my opinion, a drawer, apparently designed for the transport of goods between European countries, so that he is already met with cargo boats. In the side niches there are landing boats for transporting people. He can also transport two Chinook helicopters in the hangar, if only we had a ship for transporting the Mi-26.


            And on this page a very budget model of such ships is described, many functions are removed.
            1. KaPToC
              KaPToC April 27 2017 22: 53
              0
              Quote: Divan Divanych
              Tell this to the developers of the ship, who made a bow ramp in it for accelerated unloading of amphibious landing troops to engage in battle on the shore.

              Nevertheless, the landing will enter the battle, and not the ship at all.
              1. Div Divich
                Div Divich April 27 2017 23: 00
                0
                No need to drop troops for slaughter. It is better to clear the coast remotely, and leave the coast guard for the arrival of other ships.
                1. KaPToC
                  KaPToC April 27 2017 23: 18
                  0
                  Quote: Divan Divanych
                  No need to drop troops for slaughter. It is better to clear the coast remotely, and leave the coast guard for the arrival of other ships.

                  A sense of humor is good.
                  Did you think that the landing will storm the unclean coast? This is suicide.
                  1. Div Divich
                    Div Divich April 27 2017 23: 20
                    0
                    For unloading on the cleaned coast, accelerated unloading is not needed, and amphibious equipment too. In this case, you can safely unload cargo boats.
                    1. KaPToC
                      KaPToC April 28 2017 18: 29
                      0
                      Quote: Divan Divanych
                      For unloading on the cleaned coast, accelerated unloading is not needed, and amphibious equipment too. In this case, you can safely unload cargo boats.

                      Firstly, it is physically impossible to clean one hundred percent.
                      Secondly, it’s right to say - to land on the UNEQUIPPED coast.
                      Thirdly, the enemy can pull up reinforcements
                      And in the fourth ...
                      And in the fifth ...
                      And in the sixth.
                      1. Div Divich
                        Div Divich April 28 2017 23: 27
                        +1
                        We started with the fact that you are satisfied with the equipment of Ivan Gren, and I consider this equipment to be ancient.

                        Unloading the ship is necessary not through the bow ramp, but with the help of landing boats. Landing boats with a large carrying capacity are placed on the docks, as they are very large for placement in the side niches of the ship, and very heavy for transportation on the upper deck (raising and lowering will be very problematic). And also in the docks there are no waves, wind, rain, which simplifies loading in bad weather.

                        Medium landing ships usually contain a couple of cargo boats, hangars for transporting ground equipment, living quarters, a medical module, helicopter hangars on the upper deck, cranes for loading / unloading on the upper deck.

                        Large landing ships, from the name it’s clear that they have a displacement of two to three times that of medium ones, so you can place more types of cargo in them, for example, more helicopter hangar, or instead of a honey module for 10 people, a honey module for 100 people with medical equipment and operating rooms. The docks can accommodate more lifting boats. Place tanks for different types of fuel and other fuel and lubricants in the cargo compartments.

                        And the hull of the ship is a little unfinished. Exhaust pipes need not be made in the middle of the hull, but like ferries, on the sides, near the sides, so that goods can be moved along the ship.

                        For example, the Mistral was large, but because of the continuous flight deck, helicopter hangars are low, only small helicopters can make a runway for a couple of helicopters, and hangars for large Russian helicopters, this scheme is much more logical.
  7. Olegovi4
    Olegovi4 April 27 2017 11: 37
    0
    Hm. Why aren’t they installing missile defense? Have you decided to get along with artillery and machine guns? Not a reasonable decision for the present. Or did the author forget to write about it?
    1. A1845
      A1845 April 27 2017 11: 46
      0
      Quote: Olegovi4
      Not a reasonable decision for the present.

      on the mistral was cooler - a machine gun and a rocket of the same name launched from the shoulder laughing
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 April 27 2017 12: 53
      +2
      This is the DKVD - not a single DKVD except Wosp and America is seriously defended. Just because, as a missile system, it’s minus the 100 landing party or 15 vehicles, or 1 LCVP.

      Escort forces must cover them.

      Another thing is that the Aspids and Sparrows of the forces of Peru do not particularly fight back. However, this is a problem for the Navy of Peru, not the ship.

      If anything, Gren also has the 2 AK-630 and the Duet.
      1. Div Divich
        Div Divich April 27 2017 21: 38
        0
        In peacetime, they can even sail unaccompanied along safe routes (near borders or to neighbors), but in order to not be robbed by pirates, you need melee weapons (a large-caliber gun for intimidating boats and anti-aircraft guns for intimidating turboprop aircraft). There are different pirates, the cheapest types of equipment are available to them. If gold or alcohol is taken, then its population can engage in piracy, like this.
  8. masiya
    masiya April 27 2017 11: 47
    +2
    Well done Peru, quietly, with a thorn ... and lower the semi-helicopter carrier, albeit a small one, but a decent transporter ... Of course, the armament is nowhere, but it’s intended not to participate in sea battles, and it will cut a different shelf ...
    1. yehat
      yehat April 27 2017 12: 55
      0
      Komsomolets torpedo boat - killer of the Peruvian AUG am
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. Div Divich
    Div Divich April 27 2017 19: 32
    0
    In Russia, such ships cannot be built, and various small countries have such ships.

    What speaks of the collapsed industry of Russia.
  11. Div Divich
    Div Divich April 28 2017 00: 03
    0
    The problem of the Russian fleet is that the task for shipbuilders is somehow wrong.
    Apparently those tasks are made by cabinet officials arranged for communications, and captains of warships are not allowed to do this.

    Look for the Shamans for the paratroopers takes BMD, ride like a race car, and equipped with enough weapons.

  12. Div Divich
    Div Divich April 28 2017 00: 53
    0
    When viewing Makassar ships on the Internet, I accidentally saw how they transport a multiple launch rocket system on a landing boat.
    And the thought arose, it was possible for her to fire from the deck of the landing ship along the shore, sweeping the coast would be much faster than with other types of weapons. And you do not need expensive ship installations of this type.
  13. The comment was deleted.