By 2022, the modernization will take place 5 BOD project 1155

54
According to a representative of the Russian Navy’s Ministry of Defense’s Information and Communications Department for the Navy, Captain First Rank Igor Dygalo, repairs will be carried out by 2022 to upgrade five large anti-submarine ships of Project 1155 of the Northern and Pacific Fleets of the Navy fleet Russia.


"Vice Admiral Fists", 2012 year




"On ships, according to the technical assignments of the Navy's main command, a large amount of work will be done on upgrading life-support systems and radio-technical weapons. The schedule and the progress of repair and modernization works are constantly monitored by the Russian Navy Commander Admiral Vladimir Korolev.

According to him, the BOD project 1155 form the basis of the anti-submarine forces of the Russian Navy and are capable of operating in the distant sea and ocean zones both individually and as part of heterogeneous groups and ship search and attack groups. Currently, ships of this type, Severomorsk (Northern Fleet) and Admiral Tributs (Pacific Fleet), perform tasks of this type in the far sea zone.

A total of 12 ships of the series were built, they were incorporated into the fleet in 1980 - 1991 years. From 9 project ships to be repaired with modernization, the Admiral Tributs (TOF) was re-commissioned. In 2017, it is expected to complete work on the Admiral Kharlamov (Northern Fleet).
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    19 January 2017 08: 45
    for now, only a declaration of intent, in real life, again the deadlines will move and stretch .. as always. and what beautiful ships! no comparison with modern architecture! (solid cubism)))))
    1. +4
      19 January 2017 09: 01
      "On ships, according to the technical assignments of the Navy's main command, a large amount of work will be done on upgrading life-support systems and radio-technical weapons. The schedule and the progress of repair and modernization works are constantly monitored by the Russian Navy Commander Admiral Vladimir Korolev.


      If they manage to control, that is, hope, updated beauties will serve.
      1. +4
        19 January 2017 11: 18
        The Chinese, instead of the Moskit anti-ship missile system and artillery systems on the Project 956E destroyers, began to mount vertical launchers.
        1. 0
          20 January 2017 23: 20
          That is, to make normal frigates, if not destroyers, of them. It would be nice, but we'll see.
  2. +2
    19 January 2017 08: 48
    There would be time to build new ships on time .. Modernization without a doubt must be carried out, but not to the detriment of the construction of new ships ..
    1. 0
      19 January 2017 13: 24
      210 OKV, you are right: modernization is certainly good, but new ships are much more needed.
      I am not a sailor, but in my opinion the Project 11350 frigate will be more significant than those 1155, let alone 22350 or "Leader" needless to say. Sailors, do not be angry if I am mistaken
      1. +1
        19 January 2017 20: 55
        Type one helicopter is better than 2?
      2. 0
        20 January 2017 23: 17
        Very controversial. 11356 are built specifically for the Black Sea Fleet and not Pacific Fleet and Northern Fleet. And even then, there are no power plants for 3 ships, they want to sell the finished hulls to the Indians (it would be better to use the left scheme, through the same Indians they bought power from Ukrainians).
        22350 have not been able to bring to mind for several years. This notorious "Polyment-Redoubt" does not want to work. And to compare 22350 or 11356 with 1155 is not entirely correct. The latter were sharpened specifically for anti-submarine warfare, and 956 for the rest (they were specially created and they had to work in pairs - 1155 are looking for submarines, 956 planes and ships. Everything did not fit into one hull, it was necessary to either increase the displacement or divide the functions).
        And frigates 11356 and 22350 with a displacement of less than 5 tons cannot replace 000 in terms of anti-submarine warfare.
        "Leader" is a beautiful but still unattainable dream. And it's not even about the money. We now have few qualified personnel for their construction. Let the engineers, experience workers on the frigates gather, the weapons systems will finish. Then you can start building "Leaders". Although the project is ambiguous. Why are they so healthy? 15000-17000 t of displacement. In my opinion, the best option is like 1164 "Slava" - about 12 tons.
        1. 0
          4 September 2018 10: 49
          why engines can not buy from Koreans or Chinese?
  3. +8
    19 January 2017 08: 52
    And until 2022, the promises will either forget the promises, or resign and hi ... How tired of these empty promises ... They would have done and reported ...
    1. +1
      19 January 2017 11: 33
      Promisechkiny speak on behalf of the organization.
      So, if promises are not fulfilled, both the promise and the organization will be fined for each day of delay.
      To do so a couple of times - and decrease the balabol.
      Sincerely, Arthur
      1. +1
        19 January 2017 11: 40
        Well, here it all depends not only on the promises in the factories, but also on the promises from the Kremlin and this trepak Dygalo is just one of the last. Populist and yap ... If money is not allocated, or allocated but stolen, nothing will happen. After all, ships are being built for foreign customers and there are completely different rates ...
        1. 0
          19 January 2017 13: 23
          Yap a fine and a rusty nail "weaving" in the tongue for a day. "Extreme piercing" laughing
          With the broadcast (or personal presence) to the State Duma ... of course, under the supervision of doctors, we are not animals lol
        2. 0
          19 January 2017 13: 26
          Isis, with a manle you.
          1. 0
            19 January 2017 13: 27
            Thank you, of course, but I am of little interest in knowledge in all kinds of toys and sites, to say the least.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +5
    19 January 2017 09: 09
    This project (“Deleted”) is not the best of course in the BOD class. But there is one. Thank you to those people who saved them and didn’t give them a saw. My heart bleeds, as you recall, the figures of the new format were created by Gorbachev , and then under Yeltsin.
    1. +3
      19 January 2017 09: 25
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      This project ("Deleted") is not the best of course in the BOD class

      what And which is the best in your opinion?
      1. 0
        4 September 2018 10: 54
        Project 1134-B?
    2. +2
      19 January 2017 12: 32
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      My heart bleeds, as you recall, what the leaders of the new format did under Gorbachev and then under Yeltsin.

      That's for sure, I remember quite good helicopter carriers Leningrad and Moscow were in the navy .... maybe they would still be sailing. Hmm, and Kiev, Minsk, Novorossisk would be good, maybe they would have converted it into a "paratrooper", or a command and staff hospital .... but you never know what?
  6. +4
    19 January 2017 09: 09
    ***** In 2017, it is planned to complete work at Admiral Kharlamov (Northern Fleet) *****
    And this is complete nonsense. I read at some of the maritime forums that Kharlamov had not been running for a long time and was used as a source of spare parts for chassis ....
    1. +7
      19 January 2017 10: 02
      Quote: clerk theophan
      And this is complete nonsense. I read on some of the marine forums

      On some website, when, somewhere and somehow - therefore, I frankly declare - complete nonsense !!!
      Take your time, my friend! "Harley" to write off !!!

      Quote: clerk theophan
      Kharlamov has not been running for a long time and is used as a source of spare parts for running gears ....

      What is not running - that's for sure! But it is used as a TCB for the teams running 1155's. By the efforts of Rear Admiral Kharlamov and veterans of 678 the Moscow government took patronage over the ship.

      In the photo "Harley" is quite well-groomed with a flag and a jack!
    2. +2
      19 January 2017 13: 28
      This is what makes me happy. Kharlamov has long been in reserve, but rumors about its modernization have been around for a long time. This interview can be considered a promise to put it in operation. Of course not in 2017, but by 2020 it is quite possible. The project is successful and working. request
      1. +2
        19 January 2017 14: 13
        Yes, the author apparently confused "Shaposhnikov" with "Kharlamov".
        At Kharlamov, gas turbines have long been removed. And the case is such that it makes no sense to upgrade.
        They have not written off yet because the son of Kharlamov made efforts. But for me it is better that the name of the new ship passed.
        1. +1
          19 January 2017 14: 25
          He is one of the newest - why should the corps be killed? Stuffing and gta can be done. On the contrary, it saves time on disassembling old equipment. Still, we don’t have many ships of the first rank. Moreover, the project is successful.
  7. +1
    19 January 2017 09: 28
    Quote: Serg65
    Quote: Mar. Tira
    This project ("Deleted") is not the best of course in the BOD class

    what And which is the best in your opinion?

    Compared to the "Bukar", the BOD pr. 1155 turned out to be a step back. But this is in the past. In my opinion there are 13 units left, if I'm not mistaken of course. Was the last one built by "ADMIRAL CHABONENKO"?
    1. +4
      19 January 2017 09: 43
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      Compared with Bukar, BOD pr. 1155 was a step back

      Why did you completely confuse me, what exactly is a step backward ?????
      1. +1
        19 January 2017 09: 52
        Because of the 30-meter fairing of the GAS "Polynom", the sailing performance and seaworthiness of this ship were seriously affected - the complex turned out to be too heavy for a modest BOD. Of course, the Polynom gave great opportunities in terms of detecting enemy nuclear submarines, which it detected at a distance of up to 25 miles, which to some extent compensated for the deterioration of the Udaliy's seaworthiness. But a much more serious drawback was the complete absence of medium or long-range air defense systems "Dagger" is not that. could only fight anti-ship missiles, but not their carriers. Has this been taken into account in modern modernization?
        1. +2
          19 January 2017 10: 31
          Quote: Mar. Tira
          Due to the 30-meter fairing of GAS Polynom, the driving performance and seaworthiness of this ship were seriously affected - the complex was too heavy for a modest BOD

          If you mean bottom slimming. then do not be discouraged, the sailors have learned to deal with it.
          Quote: Mar. Tira
          But a much more serious drawback was the complete absence of medium or long-range air defense systems

          laughing I beg you, take an interest in the history of creation, etc. 956!
          Quote: Mar. Tira
          Was this taken into account in modernization?

          As far as I know, they want to stick C-400.
    2. +8
      19 January 2017 09: 59
      BOD pr. 1155 (Deleted) was developed as an improved version of BOD 1135.
      Why he is not successful I do not understand. Such was the doctrine - the anti-submarine ship complements the EM pr.956 "Sovremenny".
      But "Admiral Chabanenko" is another project - 1155.1 Udaloy (II). - but it exists in a single copy.
      Instead of two 100-mm artillery mounts AK-100, one AK-130-MP-184 was installed
      Instead of the Metel / Rastrub-B complex, the PKR 3M80 Mosquito complex was placed
      Instead of the 533 mm torpedo tubes, the universal missile and torpedo launcher PLUR Waterfall was deployed.
      Air defense systems were strengthened by replacing the AK-630 with Dirk.
      Strengthening the means of PTZ was achieved by replacing RBU-6000 with a new complex RBU-12000 Boa. Instead of the SJSC Polynom, a new SJSC Zvezda-2 was installed.
      1. +1
        19 January 2017 13: 37
        Kamiads: severomor, serg65, if I am not mistaken, you are sailors, which means your opinion will be authoritative for me.
        I hate sofa experts
    3. +4
      19 January 2017 10: 39
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      The last one was built by "ADMIRAL CHABONENKO"?

      Extreme (what a buzzword "extreme" laughing the series is already completed) was built "Panteleev". "Chabonenko" is their cousin wink
      1. +6
        20 January 2017 21: 39
        We went through the Baltic Sea with him wink He was not painted yet, but, anyway, handsome good
    4. +2
      19 January 2017 13: 31
      It remains not 13, but 9 - 8 1155 "Frigate" and one 11551 "Frigate-M" ("Admiral Chabanenko"). Of these, 6 are in service, one is under repair and 2 are in reserve.
  8. +1
    19 January 2017 09: 34
    They ought to give them a "long hand", otherwise with "Trumpets" well, it is no good.
    1. +2
      19 January 2017 10: 33
      Quote: ohotnik101
      They ought to give them a "long hand", otherwise with "Trumpets" well, it is no good.

      laughing Do you even understand the difference between "Long Arm" and "Trumpet"?
      1. 0
        21 January 2017 09: 40
        I understand a little. But apart from the "Trumpet" they have nothing to shoot with at all. The Kh-35 on board (even if in addition to the "Trumpet") would remove many questions.
    2. +1
      19 January 2017 10: 35
      Shaposhnikov’s campaign for the lead in the modernization project, 3K24 is being bought for it - in other words, 2x4 X-35.

      Well, the little things - http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1826547.html
  9. +6
    19 January 2017 09: 57
    Why do we need landing ships, where are we going to carry the landing? Maybe it’s better to build boats that will not allow enemy landing on our shore ???
    1. +2
      19 January 2017 10: 22
      What is this comment about? What does this article have to do with it?

      A ship, if anything, is vital for Russia.
      1. +6
        19 January 2017 15: 37
        Necessary for what?
        1. +4
          19 January 2017 20: 52
          This question is answered in the team of experts by Captain Evidence: To deal with enemy submarines.

          To ensure safety, and to prevent the possibility of a disarming strike from "partners".

          Russia’s anti-submarine assets are already noticeably less than the Soviet Union’s.
          1. +5
            20 January 2017 19: 44
            So I wrote, maybe it’s better anti-submarine and missile, rather than landing. You probably misunderstood me ... Landing ships-attack-we are going to attack who?
            1. +3
              20 January 2017 21: 34
              Well, so I answered this to you.

              The article seems to be about the BOD. The letter P in this abbreviation is, it seems, from the word "anti-submarine". Okay. Probably they did not understand each other.
              1. +7
                21 January 2017 07: 50
                Yes sorry hi I immediately blurted out the wrong thing, and there was a "misunderstanding." It happens, once again quarrel ... Inattentively read-anti-submarine, essno ...
    2. +2
      20 January 2017 08: 56
      Given that all the paratroopers went to the Syrian front, since it’s not even funny to carry cargo.
  10. +1
    19 January 2017 10: 26
    Quote: Serg65
    But it is used as a TCB for the teams of the 1155s running. By the efforts of Rear Admiral Kharlamov and veterans of the 678th, the Moscow government took patronage over the ship.


    God grant. I will only be glad if the ship is returned to combat work. But I very much doubt that all repair work will be completed in 2017 .. in fact, this is what I called nonsense ..
    Be sure to move to the right for a year or two ..
    1. +2
      19 January 2017 10: 36
      Quote: clerk theophan
      Be sure to move to the right for a year or two ..

      Well shifted, and? What is the problem? Of course shifted, the motherland not only needs ships!
  11. +2
    19 January 2017 10: 28
    Three or four years ago, there were rumors about the possibility of modernizing not only the electronic and other equipment of the 1155s, but also about replacing weapons. The deplorable state of the EM project 956 was the impetus for talks about the modernization of the BOD of this project into a "destroyer". Namely, the equipment instead of "Trumpet" missiles "Onyx". But then everything calmed down ...
  12. 0
    19 January 2017 10: 37
    Oh, more of such destroyers in our Navy
    1. +1
      19 January 2017 12: 20
      Quote: drunkram
      Oh, more of such destroyers in our Navy

      What did you mean?
    2. 0
      19 January 2017 13: 42
      Quote: drunkram
      Oh, more of such destroyers in our Navy

      Give time, "there will be a pipe and an accordion for Senka"
  13. 0
    20 January 2017 09: 48
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    Quote: drunkram
    Oh, more of such destroyers in our Navy

    What did you mean?

    You need to understand what I wrote about one higher. On the modernization of the BOD into a kind of surrogate for a destroyer by installing Onyx anti-ship missiles. A surrogate, of course, but better than nothing
  14. 0
    20 January 2017 22: 56
    Rusty troughs can still be ... "modernized"? However, "innovative" and "creative", but not smart ?! It's like a saddle for a cow and a racetrack, and horse racing? However, wait and see: I put on "needles" will be dismissed !!!
  15. 0
    20 January 2017 23: 03
    .... On ships, according to technical specifications
    how zadolbali these warriors and the Poklonsky with their "condemned" ...