Military Review

Rosgvardiya form a uniform standard of training

16
The process of forming a unified standard for training employees, taking into account the specifics of the new security agency, has begun in the Federal Service of National Guard Troops (FSVNG). This is reported by "Izvestia".


Rosgvardiya form a uniform standard of training


The peculiarity of the activities of the Rosguard is that its units have to deal with a wide range of issues of national security - from maintaining public order to combating terrorism.

“At present, only in the forces of the power department there are 160 of various training programs for personnel. All of them were developed before the creation of a unified structure and did not take into account the new tasks facing the security forces. These programs were not related to each other neither in terms, nor in terms of time. New methods and standards of training will be tied to the overall plan, "- told the department of" Izvestia ".

It is noted that the new programs will take into account all the nuances of the activities of the military personnel and staff of the FSFIS. “For example, the skills needed by an OMON fighter are hardly useful to a specialist in licensing and permitting work. The training program for contractors will be improved. In the schedule of their classes, more complex topics will appear that will stimulate professional growth, ”the article says.

“The key point in the training of servicemen and employees is the method of conducting classes. The officer - the head of the lesson - must work creatively. It is necessary to organize the educational process in such a way that the trainees are interested. Only then will the study bring results, and time will not be wasted, ”said Yuri Babkin, head of the Main Directorate for the preparation of troops of the Rosgvardia.

Military expert, editor of the magazine “Arsenal of the Fatherland” Victor Murakhovsky: “The experience of recent military conflicts shows that the standards even in such matters as rendering first aid or evacuating a wounded person were different for different units. Often this led to sad consequences. There were cases when professionals from special structures, being in a situation where they should use conventional weapons, simply did not know how to use them. So the development of uniform training standards for the divisions of the Rosguards is a thing that is indisputably necessary. Regardless of what these people will do later. "
Photos used:
http://vg-news.ru
16 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. cniza
    cniza 17 January 2017 09: 00
    +4
    So the development of uniform training standards for units of the Russian Guard is an indisputable thing. No matter what these people will do later. ”


    The basis of the basics - a professional must work according to the rules and creatively.
    1. FID
      FID 17 January 2017 09: 12
      +4
      According to the regulations and creatively .... And if creativity does not imply regulations? And if you need to shoot, and before you are NOT enemies, but relatives?
      1. Mystery12345
        Mystery12345 17 January 2017 09: 23
        +1
        In the Federal Service of the National Guard Forces (FSVNG)
        Well, the abbreviation ....
      2. avt
        avt 17 January 2017 09: 40
        0
        Quote: SSI
        . And if creativity does not imply regulations?

        On this occasion, it has been said from the earliest times - "Do not stick to the Charter, like a blind wall" The regulations are not a template.
      3. Oden280
        Oden280 17 January 2017 17: 47
        +2
        If they are standing in front of me, and not behind me, it means enemies in any way.
        1. The comment was deleted.
  2. DPN
    DPN 17 January 2017 09: 38
    +3
    I didn’t understand why it was created, the Army, the Ministry of Emergencies, the GRU, the police, the guards in stores to the mother, it seems to protect the oligarchs from their own people, so no one touches them anyway. The biggest homerest.
    1. Stas157
      Stas157 17 January 2017 11: 48
      +7
      Quote: DPN
      I do not understand why it was created, the Army, the Ministry of Emergencies, the GRU, the police, guards in stores to emater, it seems to protect the oligarchs from their own people

      And this is in the conditions of an acute budget deficit when the social sphere is cut! At first glance, they introduce a completely unnecessary structure that duplicates the functions of internal troops. Obviously, the Rosguard is an additional pillar to strengthen our existing power. The elite does not trust the people, is insured. I heard from the guardsmen and the provision is better than in the troops.
      1. INTA_VEGA
        INTA_VEGA 19 January 2017 14: 39
        0
        Quote: Stas157
        a completely unnecessary structure that duplicates the functions of internal troops.

        Not administered, but reorganized. They licensed a licensee to the internal troops and increased the status of the chief general with a general security officer, so there you have the reform.
        Quote: Stas157
        I heard from the guardsmen and the provision is better than in the troops.

        Providing worse, do not believe it.
        Quote: Stas157
        The elite does not trust the people, is insured.

        Trusting the people in the matter of maintaining power is idiocy. Or overthrown in rebellion, or in a democratic way (if there are such mechanisms in the country).
        FSVNG is the successor of the VV business and originates from the NKVD troops. It is not clear why the structure is "completely unnecessary".
    2. Geronimo73
      Geronimo73 17 January 2017 11: 49
      +1
      What does the Ministry of Emergencies have to do with it? Gru and the army are not the same?
  3. demotivator
    demotivator 17 January 2017 10: 24
    +2
    Quote: Mystery12345
    Well, the abbreviation ....

    In short, this abbreviation hides the internal troops, which were previously in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and now in this very guard. There, in the internal troops, combat (and political too) training has always been, even in the days of the USSR, even now, already in the Russian Federation. Everything happens in the same way as in units and subdivisions of the Ministry of Defense - in the company there is a schedule of classes, notes from platoon commanders, daily divorces for classes, etc. But how it will now be with the "uniform standard" for OMON, SOBR, LRS and private security - I can hardly imagine. I had to communicate with them both during the Chechen campaigns, and just like that, in a peaceful atmosphere - there they also have their own specifics. Why do they need a "uniform standard"? Although, who knows, maybe we do not imagine this standard at all ...
  4. demotivator
    demotivator 17 January 2017 10: 32
    +5
    Quote: SSI
    And if you need to shoot, and before you are NOT enemies, but relatives?

    So far, the troops of the National Guard are shooting at those who gallop through the Caucasus mountains with machine guns and explosives in their bosoms. Well, it is clear that these also fall under the broad concept of "people", but one must distinguish between "flies from cutlets". We do not have a day without operations to destroy various bandit formations wandering there somewhere in Chechnya, Dagestan, or Kabardino-Balkaria. At the same time, the National Guards also suffer losses. Probably, this is why they need combat training, in order to learn how to win without incurring losses.
  5. Glory1974
    Glory1974 17 January 2017 11: 45
    +1
    Combat training is needed, but how to create a single standard?
    Someone walks in the mountains, searches for and destroys fighters - some skills and abilities, they are essentially saboteurs.
    Riot police walks through cities and towns and frees hostages, destroys armed criminals, essentially anti-saboteurs. Absolutely different methods of action.
  6. taseka
    taseka 17 January 2017 15: 01
    0
    Let it go! I am only against barrage detachments !!!
    1. INTA_VEGA
      INTA_VEGA 19 January 2017 14: 45
      0
      Very vain. The detachments made an invaluable contribution to identifying enemy spies, and maintaining the combat effectiveness of the army.
      You know that the stories about "shooting your own in the back" are stories from the 90s. the main function of detachments is сбор departing forces, their sending for reformation; identification of enemy agents mixed with the retreating and those in the frontline; fight against enemy DRG.
      Given the small size and the very organizational structure of these same units - the maximum that they could - put up posts on the roads. About machine-gun nests behind their backs, this is complete heresy and slander.
  7. Vasyata
    Vasyata 17 January 2017 20: 54
    0
    Quote: Oden280
    According to the regulations and creatively .... And if creativity does not imply regulations? And, if it is necessary to shoot and before you NOT enemies, but relatives? ... If they are standing in front of me, and not behind me, it means enemies in any case.

    Some kind of incorrect and unworthy formulation of any warrior. Relatives should only be behind and not otherwise. Regardless of who your native enemies are for, they should only be behind YOUR BACK.
  8. Massik
    Massik 17 January 2017 22: 23
    0
    Bullshit, parts of the UHF and OCH for example, can not have one standard of preparation. At least 3 sections are required - VGO (combined arms standard with a recess in the guard unit), DOS (SOBR program, which is expensive and long, but efficiency is increasing at times) and UHF (combined arms + some police functions)
    Previously, there was such a picture.
    Parts of the VGO and ST guards drag, order is being monitored, the object is protected from fools and crime. If a mess happens, they somehow shoot back from the posts. DOS warriors even wherever - in the mountains, in the trenches, in the forest everywhere will figure out and adapt. SOBR is even better, but the selection criteria there are an order of magnitude higher. UHFM almost cops, patrol, disperse the rally, shoot will fit, in battle, as well as the VGO will not last long. Riot police are prepared cops, there is some kind of tactics, preparation, but they themselves are not warriors. He looked at everyone from the inside.
    It is clear that the same training as motorized rifle cannot be achieved, since it is still necessary to guard the facilities and keep order in order, but we must strive to make sense of what happens, since the guardsmen were called.