Go Russia? West does not let!

32
In the West, there is no doubt that in the coming year, Moscow will rush to the offensive on all geopolitical fronts, crowding past formidable opponents. In 2017, Russia will take full advantage of the discord in the ranks of the European Union in order to achieve its goals. At the same time, the Russians will try to advance on the former Soviet "periphery". The only question is whether they will succeed.

Go Russia? West does not let!




According to Eugene Chausovsky, an expert of the famous American analytical center Stratfor, Russia uses the weaknesses of the West in 2017. This analyst said in an article published on the portal "Market Watch".

Eugene Chausovsky is an analyst whose interests include political, economic and security issues related to the territories of the former Soviet Union, Europe and Latin America. Before settling at Stratfor, he worked at the University of Texas, where he studied Russia's demographic trends and their influence on the country's political and electoral systems. The expert has a degree in international relations from the specified university.

Chausovsky believes that in the 2017 year, Russia can finally realize what she was “looking forward to”.

Over the past three years, this country has “suffered numerous strategic defeats,” the analyst believes, and faced “considerable pressure from the West.” "Euromaidan" in Kiev, developed into a real uprising, opened a period of expansion of cooperation between Ukraine, the European Union and NATO. Other “strategic countries” located at the “periphery of Russia”, for example, Moldova and Georgia, at the same time followed Ukraine, moving closer to the West and NATO. And another thing: US and NATO forces expanded their presence and activity along the borderlands - from Poland to the Baltic countries and Romania.

Meanwhile, Moscow tried “in some cases” to influence the events in the European Union and the United States, intending to “undermine Western unity,” the author admits.

The United States and the European Union didn’t do anything either: they “imposed and constantly extended” sanctions against the Russian Federation, justified by the latter’s actions in the Crimea and in the east of Ukraine. Restrictive measures created an additional burden on the Russian economy. This economy, the expert reminds, plunged into recession after the fall in oil prices in the middle of 2014.

In order to "knock out" its place at the negotiating table with the West, Moscow began to participate in the Syrian conflict. However, this strategy did not lead to the desired result (with respect to not the Syria, but the conflict in Ukraine).

Yet 2017 year may be the start for a new stage in the confrontation of Russia with the West.

The past year showed the weakness of the West: Brexit showed deep cracks in the European Union, and the victory of Donald Trump - a split in the presidential elections in the United States. These events can serve as the beginning of a breakthrough in Washington’s policy toward Moscow. Another break could happen in Europe, where elections will be held in 2017. The centers of change can be France, the Netherlands, Germany, and also, probably, Italy. This may further deepen the differences in the continental block and even "challenge the future of European integration."

Therefore, Russia has opportunities to counter the West in the 2017 year. They were before. Moscow is already working in this direction, influencing events in the European Union and the United States, undermining Western unity through “propaganda campaigns, cyber attacks and political maneuvering.” Most likely, Russia will intensify these efforts in the 2017 year, the author admits. The goal will be to mitigate or end the regime of sanctions imposed earlier by the US and the EU. At the same time, successes in Syria can improve the position of the Kremlin in negotiations with the administration of Donald Trump "on a number of issues," the expert notes.

In addition, Moscow will restore the former influence of "the post-Soviet periphery," indicates Chausovsky. Given the turmoil in the European Union, Brussels will hesitate for a long time before new members join in 2017. As for the prospects for integration with the European Union and NATO, are there any such Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia? The expert does not even rule out that all three states “will reconsider their relations with Russia”. There are grounds for this today: at the recent presidential elections in Moldova, Igor Dodon was elected, a candidate who pledged to expand the country's ties with Moscow and reconsider the conditions for integration with the EU. Ukraine and Georgia are unlikely to follow his example, but they can still approach relations with Russia more pragmatically.

At the same time, Moscow may strengthen its influence in Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan, which have maintained neutrality with respect to Russia since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Moscow recently signed agreements with each country to expand military cooperation. Transactions do not mean “strategic regrouping” either for Baku or for Tashkent, but they will nevertheless increase Russia's influence in these republics. In parallel, Moscow will try to play a more active role in ensuring security in Central Asia.

As for Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, these states in 2017 year, according to the expert, "will double their cooperation with Russia." Many of these countries have already signed agreements with Moscow regarding the deepening of security integration.

However, there are no guarantees that Moscow will succeed. Russia's return “to a big game is far from guaranteed,” the analyst writes. The United States and NATO are unlikely to completely withdraw their forces from the European borderlands. In addition, Russia will not be able to dominate Eurasia. Finally, various forces in the United States and the European Union will prevent the lifting or easing of sanctions against Moscow. Ukraine and Georgia will not necessarily look in the direction of Russia. According to the analyst, they will estimate the possibility of creating their own alliances with neighboring countries (Poland, Turkey) in order to "strengthen themselves against Moscow."

Russia itself is unlikely to “act too aggressively”. The expert believes that Moscow “will be cautious,” since it has “lingering economic and political problems” at home.

Nevertheless, the author believes, Russia "can make significant progress" in negotiations with the West and on the former Soviet periphery in 2017.

* * *


While an expert from the Stratfor analytical center points out Moscow’s activity in the international arena and attempts to influence certain forces in Europe, which can lead to a change in the geopolitical balance, the United States does not intend to weaken sanctions, but introduces new ones before the New Year , on the personal initiative of Mr. Obama, who was left to steer America nothing at all. And that's not all: US senators hurry to enter one more (this time “all-encompassing”) sanctions against Russia, which, like the New Year's “gift” from Mr. Obama, are tied to “cyber interference” during the November 2016 presidential election. There seems to be no end-edge to these sanctions, and Donald Trump is unlikely to be able to influence this process. Cold War is much easier to start than stop.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. +7
      11 January 2017 06: 36
      Are you Russian? .. If yes, then jump up. And higher! Outrun the horses from the Maidan! To me, a simple Russian person, the price of oil is not like a lantern, well, let's say it's neither cold nor hot .. Prices creep up regardless of the price of oil, well, our money bags aren’t grabbing at all .. About the bloody Kremlin gebnyu. Have you said that? These are your words between the lines! Yes, there are no leverage anymore .. And we are alive and still alive. and to all of us I wish you are not among them.
      Quote: apro
      How much can this nonsense be procrastinated? Who is Russia now so that there is something dependent on it? What leverage does the West have in the Putin regime? What share in the global economy does Russia have to reckon with? For Russians, one was glad that oil jumped up and the dollar dipped and that’s all .......
      1. +9
        11 January 2017 06: 58
        Quote: 210ox
        Prices are creeping up regardless of the price of oil. Well, our money bags are still not being grabbed ..


        There is no money, but YOU hold on there ...

        There is money, only they are being poked in pockets and foreign hardships!
        1. +3
          11 January 2017 08: 03
          Quote: Titsen
          There is money, only they are being poked in pockets and foreign hardships!

          And in more detail, you can, with names, facts and evidence, or so decided to blurt out, like "heard the ringing." If freedom of speech allows you to express your opinion without proof, even if it is stupid, then there is nothing to prevent me from characterizing you as another stupid superconductor of other people's nonsense, the Maidan, by the way, began with such idiots)))
          Z.Y. In Russia, as before, there are two troubles, the main one is Fools, and they are dear ...
          1. +1
            11 January 2017 08: 49
            -In Russia, as before, there are two troubles, the main one is Fools and they are dear ...
            Three fools on the road ...
            -Liked about the "hesitation with the admission of new members to NATO."
            1). Forgot Georgia.
            2). It’s easy to make another amendment - the paper will endure everything.
            AND IMPORTANT: The West does not need
            DIRECT military conflict with Russia. It is enough to weaken the Russian Federation by local ("local"). For the time being, "cooperation" is enough.
          2. +1
            11 January 2017 15: 47
            Vasiliev, Serdyukov, Ulyukaev, a millionaire cop, some kind of eccentric, or the mayor, or the governor in the Far East. Few? Or do you take off your pink eyeglasses?
            1. 0
              15 January 2017 01: 39
              I saw what the Russian Army under Serdyukov turned into, and everyone in Crimea and Syria saw it, and the enemies really do not like it, and the rest are sitting.
              Do you happen to earn extra money as a propagandist in the State Department, or is their brainless victim?
      2. +11
        11 January 2017 09: 55
        Quote: 210ox
        not, for a simple Russian person, the price of oil, not like a lantern, well, let's say it’s neither cold nor hot .. The prices creep up regardless of the price of oil, well, our money bags aren’t getting enough.

        Not true! stop Our prices creep up only in three cases: when the price of oil rises, the price of oil falls and the price of oil does not change! fellow hi
  2. +9
    11 January 2017 06: 24
    For me, recently, the word "analyst" has become a dirty word, standing on a par with the words "deputy" and "official" ...
    1. +2
      11 January 2017 07: 00
      Quote: Finches
      For me, recently, the word "analyst" has become a dirty word, standing on a par with the words "deputy" and "official" ..


      See the root of the word - A N A L!
    2. +9
      11 January 2017 08: 51
      Quote: Finches
      For me, recently, the word "analyst" has become a dirty word, standing on a par with the words "deputy" and "official" ...

      You shouldn't be talking about the latter, we are "in the same boat" or rather "on the same gallery". You understand
    3. +3
      11 January 2017 12: 14
      How can you do that? After all, both deputies and officials are representatives of United Russia, and. as they assure me here, all of Russia voted for EP in a single impulse!
      Maybe you are not a patriot? Or do you have what against the party? Ah ah ah...

      Joke and sarcasm if that ...
      1. +3
        11 January 2017 12: 30
        The EP is generally not to do with it - we’ll say that for her (in principle, I don’t go to the polls since 1996), and my wife voted for her and my three friends, the commander of the ZVO brigade voted for her and, I’ll say more, most of the servicemen of these brigades, with family members voted for United Russia and not only on urgent recommendations from above, which could have taken place, but for the most part on their own mind ... There are also normal guys who fulfill their duties with dignity, and sometimes not for the biggest salaries, I call them civil servants, but here, I used the word "official" as a name for a collective image of a parasite that has stuck to the body! And no matter what party affiliation he is - United Russia, Zhirinovite, Zyuganovite ... - this is a cover! He is a parasite!
  3. +7
    11 January 2017 06: 33
    Liked about the "hesitation with the admission of new members to NATO":

    - Moldova "has" PMR
    - Ukraine "has" LDNR, not to mention Crimea
    - NATO in its charter has a clause prohibiting admission to the bloc of countries that have unresolved territorial conflicts.

    Eventually have the absence of any hesitation in Brussels on the admission of members: for now there is simply no one to accept laughing
    1. 0
      11 January 2017 06: 53
      Why is there no one? .. Look at the article with the photo of the half-wit .. Here you have to take those there ..
      Quote: Cat Man Null
      Liked about the "hesitation with the admission of new members to NATO":

      - Moldova "has" PMR
      - Ukraine "has" LDNR, not to mention Crimea
      - NATO in its charter has a clause prohibiting admission to the bloc of countries that have unresolved territorial conflicts.

      Eventually have the absence of any hesitation in Brussels on the admission of members: for now there is simply no one to accept laughing
  4. +1
    11 January 2017 06: 58
    “In order to knock out a place for itself at the negotiating table with the West, Moscow began to participate in the Syrian conflict. However, such a strategy did not lead to the desired result. (regarding not Syria, but the conflict in Ukraine) "

    "Successes in Syria can improve the Kremlin's position in negotiations with the Donald Trump administration "on a variety of issues," the expert notes. "
    What else can I add?
    D.B.
  5. +4
    11 January 2017 07: 00
    Yes, the American has an "interesting" analysis:

    1. Russia can do it.
    2. Russia may NOT work out .... lol
  6. +2
    11 January 2017 07: 12
    And you can no longer print such analysts here. One blah blah blah. Ulyukaevshchina
  7. 0
    11 January 2017 07: 25
    The only thing this "analyst" is right about is that the time has come. Just not yet "rush to the offensive", and slowly and thoughtfully increase the pressure ...
  8. +2
    11 January 2017 07: 40
    Such a vision of Russia's actions in the west. Russia has its own vision, and it differs from their templates.
    And the West has repeatedly found itself in an uncomfortable position that it is not able to adequately predict the actions of Russians
    1. +2
      11 January 2017 08: 58
      - Has it become better in Russia lately?
      - Yes, it has become!
      - Will it get even better in Russia?
      - No, he won’t!
      - Why not?
      - Because, until the national "idea" and ideology is made public, Russia will remain in the same "templates of the West", whoever is there who would not be rolling about her Army and Navy! There is no need to bomb the trenches when the generals are sucking!
      - So maybe both the "idea" and the ideology will be accepted?
      - No, they won’t accept it, otherwise it’s necessary to at least change ... plant a half-Kremlin for wrecking and harassment ...

      (Diologists Platonenko)
  9. +3
    11 January 2017 08: 50
    Russia in 2017 takes advantage of the weaknesses of the West

    And what smart politician and leader of the country would not use the enemy's weakness for his (country) interests? To be honest, I am bastard from such analysts who pass off common truths as their "deep" analysis. We also have enough of them, especially from the so-called. "liberal handshake" hangouts.
  10. +1
    11 January 2017 10: 02
    The speaker contradicts himself. A priori, the FSA are the hegemon in the world, according to them, So there is simply no "big game", there is simple world management. Russia ceased to obey the "hegemon" and only after that the "big game" begins. Total - four players in the business, FSA. Russia, China and India. The rest of the contenders for the game are not politically stable. Respect to Chuvakin.
  11. 0
    11 January 2017 10: 35
    Another acid sorrel soup
  12. 0
    11 January 2017 10: 40
    As always, Mr. Philosopher, let's agree on the concepts. If "Russia" has ceased to "obey" and has become independent, then what does the "West" have to do with it? "West" who is this? "Russia" is not only the Russian Federation, but several parts. There is also a division within the RF. Where is "forward" for each of these factions? The Cold War is a form of peaceful coexistence of two antagonistic social systems. If the Russian Federation is waging a "cold war", then communism has already been built in the United States. Something like this.
  13. +2
    11 January 2017 12: 20
    I do not understand what the article is about?
    What does any disturbance have to do with it?
    ANY country that is considered an international player, and not a regional mongrel, ALWAYS follows its interests around the world. Does someone act differently?
    Of course, there are countries, as an example of the Baltic states, which act to the detriment of their interests, but they do not represent any role in international politics.
    Russia looks after its own interests - that says it all. Whether it works or not is the second question. It is normal to use the weaknesses of the "partners" in order to comply with their interests.
    Of course, in the West they want to see the Russian Federation collapsed into many specific principalities, then "human rights" are not violated and in general everything is fine ... But ... that time has passed. So let them yell now
  14. 0
    11 January 2017 13: 52
    A photo in an article with meaning.
    Kids bear cubs grow up !!!
    1. 0
      13 January 2017 14: 15
      And who made the photograph you liked, the poacher? What happened next?
  15. 0
    11 January 2017 14: 20
    Quote: SPACE
    Quote: Titsen
    There is money, only they are being poked in pockets and foreign hardships!

    And in more detail, you can, with names, facts and evidence, or so decided to blurt out, like "heard the ringing." If freedom of speech allows you to express your opinion without proof, even if it is stupid, then there is nothing to prevent me from characterizing you as another stupid superconductor of other people's nonsense, the Maidan, by the way, began with such idiots)))
    Z.Y. In Russia, as before, there are two troubles, the main one is Fools, and they are dear ...

    Living in Russia, in any region, evidence is not needed.
    A lot of facts, from housing and communal services to high-ranking.
  16. 0
    11 January 2017 18: 43
    Quote: SPACE
    Quote: Titsen
    There is money, only they are being poked in pockets and foreign hardships!

    And in more detail, you can, with names, facts and evidence, or so decided to blurt out, like "heard the ringing." If freedom of speech allows you to express your opinion without proof, even if it is stupid, then there is nothing to prevent me from characterizing you as another stupid superconductor of other people's nonsense, the Maidan, by the way, began with such idiots)))
    Z.Y. In Russia, as before, there are two troubles, the main one is Fools, and they are dear ...

    Details? -Please. Look at those lawmaking deputies who make anti-people’s laws in Russia, against Russians, against the people of Russia, against Russia. What? Yes, the same tax on the unemployed, the tax on medicine. From the renaming of the name, the essence does not change. Retirement Age Raising Act: The Juvenile Justice Act — where instead of providing dad and mom with work and a good salary so they can provide for their child and themselves — instead, they take the child out of the family.
    Here you have names, facts and evidence. All laws are covered in the media. Lawmakers are made in the Council of Ministers. And behind them are certain surnames and people. Here you have all the evidence, facts and names.
  17. +1
    11 January 2017 23: 43
    In addition to the failure in Ukraine, Russia did not have any particular defeats. The Ukrainian card can be played over time
    1. 0
      16 January 2017 23: 50
      I think those who want to walk in droves with the Russian flag will not be anywhere else
    2. 0
      19 January 2017 10: 27
      Failure in Ukraine?
      Release the reins and give independence is not a failure.
      There was business between countries, peoples communicated without any hatred, and suddenly everything changed.
      Miracles do not happen.
      In any case, the paths are different, some are tired, while others are suffering. But to change the country's domestic policy due to hatred of its neighbors is godless.