Tricky comments. Historical military excursion for the Baltic countries in the light of the statements of the British Prime Minister

72
British Prime Minister Theresa May announced her readiness to protect the Baltic countries in the event of aggression by the Russian Federation.





News This one, widely spread by many media outlets (The Independent and TheUK.one magazine were the primary source) caused a stir in the Baltic countries. There are, in principle, why, especially for those for whom the inevitable Russian aggression and the subsequent occupation is not interpreted as a medical diagnosis, but as the harsh reality of today's day.

Teresa May in her interview stated that Britain is faithful to its obligations under NATO, and in the event of Russian aggression in the Baltic States, British troops will defend Estonia and Lithuania.

The Prime Minister stressed that British troops would take part in military exercises to be held in Estonia. According to Theresa May, "this will emphasize our serious attitude to our obligations."

“The fifth article of the NATO statute states that we support any country against which military force is used. Some people think that America will change its attitude towards NATO [after Donald Trump’s arrival] ... I think America will remain committed to NATO just as we are, ”said Theresa May.

It is worth noting that Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed rather skeptical about American support for NATO and hinted that in the event of Russian aggression in Estonia, the alliance forces will not defend this country.

But I'm not talking about that. I mean that it would not be worthwhile to raise such a joyful cry about the statements of Mrs. May, but it would be better to take up the textbooks stories. Or more serious historical works.

And rightly, there would be much less reason to rejoice.

It is worth remembering, probably, Czechoslovakia. Yes, Britain did not have with the Czechs military agreements and alliances, they were in Czechoslovakia and France. However, it was the premieres of Chamberlain and Daladier who signed the shameful Munich Treaty.

At one in the morning on 30, September, 1938, Mr. Chamberlain, Daladier, Mussolini, and Hitler signed the Munich Agreement. After that, the Czechoslovak delegation was admitted to the hall where this agreement was signed. All the rest is lyrics. Germany divided Czechoslovakia and took for itself the Sudetenland with the help of Great Britain and France.

Go ahead?

25 August 1939, 2 day after the conclusion of the non-aggression treaty between Germany and the Soviet Union, a pact between Poland and the United Kingdom on general protection was signed.

The treaty contained mutual promises in the provision of military assistance in the event that one of the parties was attacked by a third party.

What happened 1 September 1939, probably not worth mentioning. Yes, the 3 of September, the pact-bound France and Great Britain declared a “strange war” on Germany. And they quietly "fought" with the aggressor, while Hitler carried the talentless Rydz-Smigly into the trash.

Year 1940. Soviet-Finnish war. The Finns really counted on the help of the allies, especially since French Prime Minister Daladier announced his readiness to send French soldiers and 50 bombers to Finland for war against the USSR 000 100. The British Government, in the person of Premier Chamberlain, agreed to send British bombers to Finland 50.

In addition to the bombers and artillery, the Finns asked to use the “pressed” Polish fleet, but they did not receive anything. While the Allies conferred, the Finns capitulated.

So, gentlemen of the Balts, you would not be so happy with the furious promises of Mrs. May. For Theresa May in the first place - the Prime Minister of Great Britain. And she will keep her promises. But peculiar. Historically proven.

What Mrs. May thinks about America causes laughter. What America thinks about this, Donald Trump will say. And when he says that, then we will speak substantively.

In the meantime ... in the meantime, I would advise everyone to rejoice at the words of the British premier to delve into history. And I remind you that 2 March 1940, France and Britain promised the golden mountains to the Finns. But the discussions lasted and lasted, and the coordination meeting was to be held on March 12. That is, on the very day when the bloodless Finnish army capitulated.

Punatics, will you last 10 days? Or at least 10 hours? It is doubtful ...

So not worth it. No noise, no joy. Neither wake famously. It is better to think about the fact that Russia will definitely not go to this aggression. Who will give up?
72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +42
    11 January 2017 06: 20
    Every woman who comes into politics begins to pose as Margaret Thatcher or Indira Gandhi, but in the end they even do not reach Cicciolina ... laughing
    1. +16
      11 January 2017 07: 17
      Most women are far from Cicciolina! laughing Here the English Theresa is trying to play the role of a confessor - a comforter at the deathbed of the Baltic Young Europeans.
  2. +8
    11 January 2017 06: 27
    Britons, will you be able to protect your own home without the help of others?
    1. +15
      11 January 2017 10: 29
      Well, if only from the Baltic laughing
    2. +3
      11 January 2017 11: 29
      They now do not even have their own nuclear weapons ...
    3. +18
      11 January 2017 14: 57
      They will not be able to.
      Recently, he spent the night near the airport and refused a taxi: it’s business to walk two kilometers on a footpath in good weather, and even on a light one. The landlord looked at me as if I had been asked: to walk ?? The people will not be able to minimize stress desire to lose comfort, even for a moment. Even in their own country they are not able to cope with the Arabs either. And if you cast doubt on the bbc or Discovery channel, then you are definitely the enemy, and you have to complain
    4. +2
      13 January 2017 21: 47
      They can’t even protect against a gang of emigrants
  3. +9
    11 January 2017 06: 39
    It is worth noting that Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed rather skepticism about American support for NATO, and hinted that in the event of Russian aggression in Estonia, the alliance forces will not defend this country.


    Trump didn't say that. He said that it’s unfair when the United States spends a lot of money on protecting Europe, and European countries do not fulfill their obligations to spend 2 percent of GDP on defense and added that if that is the case, the United States would better spend the money that goes to NATO on the modernization of its strategic nuclear forces, navy, aviation and ground forces. Horseradish is not sweeter for us. The American army under Trump will be much stronger. He has already stated this and the program has an increase in military spending. I don’t understand what is there to enjoy ???
    1. +4
      11 January 2017 06: 48
      In addition to requirements to increase the military budget, the states require that they (the Young Europeans) purchase new weapons. As a rule, in America, this way the states will also improve their situation here, they will discard the used ones, and it will be fresher for themselves, their loved ones.
      1. +8
        11 January 2017 08: 20
        Quote: lwxx
        In addition to requirements to increase the military budget, the states require that they (the Young Europeans) purchase new weapons. As a rule, in America, this way the states will also improve their situation here, they will discard the used ones, and it will be fresher for themselves, their loved ones.


        Then the local "intelligentsia" howled, like where we were going and where we came! And they are silent about the occupation, apparently even for apparently and before them the whole absurdity of such statements has come down. And such an interesting moment. As a normal sober young lady (Wagenknecht, Le Pen) it is so nice to see. And like May, Clintonsha is better not to remember before going to bed! As there are Eastern authors "All vices were written on his face!"
  4. +3
    11 January 2017 07: 09
    Theresa May declared her readiness to protect the Baltic countries in case of aggression by the Russian Federation

    They do not need to think about the Balts, but about themselves. Yesterday they wrote that a new rocket (supersonic) was being tested, which could, if necessary, arrive in England in 13 minutes. So, until someone starts to help someone, they themselves will need to have time to pray.
    1. 0
      11 January 2017 09: 03
      Quote: rotmistr60
      They do not need to think about the Balts, but about themselves.


      By the way, information about the death of Elizabeth was confirmed:
      1. 0
        11 January 2017 09: 20
        Well, now the throne will be divided. At least for some time it will not be up to us.
        1. +1
          11 January 2017 09: 26
          Quote: rotmistr60
          Well, now the throne will be divided.


          No, everything is planned in advance, this "kingzdom" keeps. But the snot about the sea will be. I remember that I was in my second year, and our third-year students went to the coronation of Elizabeth, told a lot of interesting things. Well, God bless her (about the deceased, or good, or nothing).
          1. +1
            11 January 2017 09: 34
            No, everything is pre-scheduled there.

            Painted does not mean execution.
            But the snot about the sea.

            I completely agree with this. There will be a lot of snot, and it seems to me from exalted youth. "Men" will decide the fate of England (to be honest - the most ridiculous). I can already see how the lords in wigs thoughtfully decide something and at the same time forget about Russia even for a minute.
            1. +1
              11 January 2017 09: 39
              Quote: rotmistr60
              I can already see how the Lords in wigs thoughtfully decide something and at the same time forget about Russia for even a minute.


              If this is a pleasure for you, then I am glad for you, and I will go and brew arabica. A cup of coffee with a little bit of "Riga balsam" is cooler than the House of Lords. good
              1. +1
                11 January 2017 09: 48
                I agree with you. hi
      2. 0
        11 January 2017 14: 52
        Quote: Lelek
        By the way, information about the death of Elizabeth was confirmed:

        Yes, it seems to have refuted this message. Https: //www.vesti.ru/doc.html? Id = 284127
        9
        1. 0
          12 January 2017 08: 40
          Quote: andj61
          Yes, it seems to have refuted this message.


          Air Force confirmed. Yes
      3. +2
        11 January 2017 22: 10
        It is amazing that our whole SMRAD was silent for so long that the old whore died. I began to think that this is a fake.
        It’s a pity I don’t drink, otherwise I would have lulled a couple of piles of joy, that it became less vile rubbish!
        I really hope that soon the hunchbacked one will die in hellish torment.
  5. +5
    11 January 2017 07: 18
    We must return to the sending of the question of the Russian attack on the Baltic States. And then ask yourself: do we need it? The answer comes right there - no, don't. Let them sit quietly and do not bark, then they will forget about everyone in general, while they themselves will quietly die of their own independence. But just in oblivion, the whole thing is this - I really do not want this either by the Baltic non-gamers themselves, or by the gentlemen from NATO, who receive quite good incomes from this hysteria.
  6. +10
    11 January 2017 07: 19
    Russia has no interests in the Baltic countries. I studied these republics in sufficient detail. My responsibilities for work and service, in addition to creating new enterprises, included the equipment of all civil and military airfields and airports. We have done our job. The republics were prosperous, with a wide network of educational institutions. And now Russia does not need them. Let them bend and lose their population.
    Chamberlain's head, but Brean is also a head. That’s what they said in our time. I have the honor.
    1. +3
      11 January 2017 08: 30
      quote, as I understand it?
      1. +1
        11 January 2017 20: 04
        quote, as I understand it?
        Ilf and Petrov, Golden Calf
        Once they used to gather here to make deals. Now they were being pulled here, to a sunny corner, by a long-term habit and the need to scratch old tongues. They read Moscow Pravda every day — they did not respect the local press — and the old people saw everything that happened in the world as a prelude to declaring Chernomorsk a free city. Once upon a time, a hundred years ago, Chornomorsk was a truly free city, and it was so fun and profitable that the legend of the "free port" still cast a golden shine on a bright corner near the Florida cafe.

        - Read about the conference on disarmament? - one piqué vest turned to another piqué vest. - Speech by Earl Bernstorf.

        - Bernstorf is the head! - the asked vest answered in such a tone, as if he was convinced of it on the basis of long-term acquaintance with the count. “Have you read what Snowden made at a meeting of voters in Birmingham, this stronghold of the Conservatives?”

        - Well, what to talk about ... Snowden is a goal! Listen, Valiadis, ”he addressed the third old man in Panama. “What do you say about Snowden?”

        “I will tell you frankly,” answered the panama, “do not put a finger in Snowden's mouth.” I personally would not put my finger.

        And, in no way embarrassed that Snowden would not have allowed Valiadis to put a finger into his mouth for anything, the old man continued:

        “But no matter what you say, I’ll tell you frankly, Chamberlain is still the same head.”

        Pique vests lifted shoulders. They did not deny that Chamberlain was also a head. But most of all, Briand consoled them.

        - Briand! they said with fervor. - This is the head! He with his pan-Europe project ...

        “I'll tell you frankly, Monsieur Pound,” Valiadis whispered, “it's all right.” Benes has already agreed to pan-Europe, but you know, under what condition?

        Pique vests gathered closer and pulled out chicken necks.

        - Provided that Chernomorsk will be declared a free city. Benes is the head. After all, they need to sell someone their agricultural implements? So we will buy.

        With this message, the eyes of the elderly flashed. For many years they wanted to buy and sell,

        - Brian is the head! they said with a sigh. - Benes is also the head.

        When Ostap woke up from his thoughts, he saw that an unfamiliar old man in a crushed straw hat with a greasy black ribbon was holding him firmly overboard. His tow-tie slid to the side, and a copper cufflink looked directly at Ostap.

        “And I tell you,” the old man shouted into the ear of the great combiner, “that MacDonald will not do that!” He will not go for this bait! Do you hear?

        Ostap pushed the boiling old man with his hand and climbed out of the crowd.

        - Hoover is the head! - rushed after him. - and Hindenburg -
    2. 0
      11 January 2017 11: 26
      One head is good, and two are already mutant.
      1. 0
        13 January 2017 17: 39
        Quote: UNCLE
        One head is good, and two are already mutant.

        Super mutant! smile
        Ehhh ... a blue jumpsuit with a yellow number 13, a bozar stolen from the NKR market, power armor ... and AuktsYona's "Road" when loaded.
    3. 0
      15 January 2017 15: 35
      Quote: midshipman
      Russia has no interests in the Baltic countries.

      What about the coast? I think it would be very useful. I’m not about capturing them, but, eventually ...
  7. +1
    11 January 2017 07: 21
    The West will fight until the last ... Baltic soldier.
    1. +10
      11 January 2017 09: 03
      Quote: knn54
      The West will fight until the last ... Baltic soldier.

  8. +3
    11 January 2017 07: 32
    A reasonable question arises. What is there in the Baltics because of which Russia must certainly attack it?
    1. +1
      11 January 2017 08: 04
      there are sprats. There will be a "sprat war"
      1. +3
        11 January 2017 08: 31
        wine and women in the fortress - three days walk !!
    2. +1
      12 January 2017 18: 16
      Quote: private person
      A reasonable question arises. What is there in the Baltics because of which Russia must certainly attack it?

      Only tribals know the answer to this question. Russians do not know and we constantly ask you to inform the tribalt about this. but those nasty do not reveal their secret. bully
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. +2
    11 January 2017 07: 58
    The Baltic countries themselves will soon bend. They survived through transit through their ports, created back in the USSR and they did sprats! Now transit is decreasing every year. Latest news in this thread:
    15.12.2016 16:00 RIGA SITE "Baltnews.lv"
    http://baltnews.lv/pasaule/20161215/1018423901.ht
    ml
    “The volume of transshipment of Russian oil cargo through Estonian ports has been declining for a year. Now the Russian fertilizer company Akron is looking for an opportunity to transfer its dry cargo from Estonian ports to Russian ones.
    The company will continue to transship liquid cargo through Estonia, because there is no capacity in Russia and it is impossible to build, for example, an ammonia transshipment terminal, writes the Estonian portal rus.err.ee with reference to Interfax.
    "In an interview with Interfax, the chairman of the board of directors of the Russian fertilizer company Akron, Alexander Popov, said that the reorientation of Russian cargoes from the Baltic states also affected his company, which has two terminals in Estonia: in Muuga port for transshipment of dry fertilizers and in Sillamäe port - for the transshipment of ammonia.

    “There is an order to reorient our dry cargoes from Estonian ports to Russian ports. And we are now negotiating with various stevedores, the railway, the owners of coastline territories. or construction of our own port facilities, "Popov said.
    1. +4
      11 January 2017 08: 15
      Quote: vlad007
      Now transit is decreasing every year.

      In Estonia and Latvia, yes.
      And in Lithuanian Klaipeda, there is an increase that the capricious Butka provides, despite the 25% discount given by Russian Railways for the transit of petroleum products from the Belarusian stations Barbarov and Novopolotsk to ports in northwestern Russia.
      1. +3
        11 January 2017 08: 32
        Quote: Moore

        In Estonia and Latvia, yes.
        And in Lithuanian Klaipeda, there is an increase that the capricious Father’s provides, despite the 25% discount on oil products presented by Russian Railways ...

        So Father, the krantik was blocked, the supply of petroleum products was reduced! And with gas, too, graters go. I think that economic measures against the Baltic states are "serious and for a long time"! A matter of time - the wheel of History will roll them up!
    2. +2
      11 January 2017 09: 44
      Transshipment remained from the Soviet Union, but there was nothing to transship)))) Now let the British move here and there))) half-fools. And let the Americans pay as transportation of cattle.
  11. sl3
    0
    11 January 2017 08: 28
    When you are zero without a wand, you are trying to make yourself a significant figure.
  12. +4
    11 January 2017 08: 35
    and in the event of Russian aggression in the Baltic, British troops will defend Estonia and Lithuania.

    As history shows, the British are ready to wage war until the last Allied soldier.
    And all these statements are a concussion in standby mode.
    There is no real help in the case of what the Baltic states will be - this is almost a fact.
  13. 0
    11 January 2017 08: 53
    Regular blah blah blah remember the not-so-old Turkey, here is the fifth fifth article
  14. +5
    11 January 2017 08: 56
    British Prime Minister Theresa May announced her readiness to protect the Baltic countries in the event of aggression by the Russian Federation.


    Not that she thinks, oh not that. The health of the nation must be taken care of, urgently wink
    British scientists, having conducted a number of studies in 2015, argue that smoking is an important problem that may affect penile size. The addiction, according to experts, can lead to a decrease in the penis by an average of 1 centimeter.
  15. +1
    11 January 2017 08: 57
    Theresa May declared her readiness to protect the Baltic countries in case of aggression by the Russian Federation

    What is the problem? Start right now - destroy everything that the Russians gave them!
    1. +1
      13 January 2017 18: 32
      This item, consider it has already been completed. Yes fool
  16. 0
    11 January 2017 09: 05
    partial truth in the article is half-lie
  17. 0
    11 January 2017 09: 40
    She can be seen smoking a Dutch.
  18. +1
    11 January 2017 09: 53
    It is surprising that the West is trying to convince about the desire to attack the Balts. But what's the point? Why does the Russian Federation need this territory? The Baltic states themselves will fall apart. Soon, popular uprisings will begin. and will the RF be to blame again then? Of course it will)))) these are the rules of the game
    1. +4
      11 January 2017 10: 18
      Yes, about popular uprisings in the Baltic states - this is pearl. Are you getting ready for KVN?
      1. +2
        11 January 2017 12: 13
        It will be the slowest unrest ..
      2. 0
        27 January 2017 09: 51
        Nah, I don’t like KVN, and it’s hard to go into humor. It will just be interesting when migrants go there, when they pay as much for idleness as a working citizen. When state policy is aimed at improving relations with Western countries, and not at solving problems ... no, nothing will be wrong
    2. The comment was deleted.
  19. +2
    11 January 2017 10: 14
    Henry John Temple, Lord Palmerston; since the 1802 of the Viscount (English Henry John Temple, 3rd Viscount of Palmerston, 20 of October 1784 - 18 of October 1865) - a famous English statesman, led the defense for many years, then foreign policy of the state, in 1855 — 1865 (with a short break) Prime Minister:
    "Therefore, I affirm that it is shortsighted to consider this or that country a permanent ally or an eternal enemy of England. We have no permanent allies, we have no eternal enemies. Only our interests are immutable and eternal, and our duty is to follow them." (Speech in the House of Commons March 1, 1848)
  20. +2
    11 January 2017 11: 22
    And also Britain and France were the guarantors of the Treaty of Versailles, that is, they had to protect Czechoslovakia and Poland under this agreement.
  21. +2
    11 January 2017 12: 00
    In the entire Baltic, there are fewer people left than the shattered Mukhos ..... ke. And the noise, the noise ....
    And for these few sprat eaters, the "ugly Englishwoman" will fit into a conflict with a nuclear power ?!
    Balts, you yourself are not funny?
    What a stink from decaying sprats!
    1. 0
      13 January 2017 18: 20
      it's not about the population, but about the exit of the Russian Federation to the sea ... in short, the Baltic countries are located "successfully" ...
  22. +1
    11 January 2017 12: 46
    Why empty talk, soon in the so-called "Baltic countries" besides the Russians, there will be no one left, and the screams of all sorts of unfinished climacterics, why should they pay attention to them, they will tell them, they will stop them!
  23. 0
    11 January 2017 12: 53
    yes this is not the queen .... habalka
  24. 0
    11 January 2017 12: 56
    The fabulist Krylov has an answer to all these attacks in the fable Elephant and pug.
  25. 0
    11 January 2017 13: 15
    Terezka along the way from the far Labasyatsky mushrooms ate.
  26. +3
    11 January 2017 13: 21
    Historical analogies are great, but NATO troops are being deployed to their eastern border (including the Baltic states) not to defend against Russia, but to attack it and its allies. Only in WWII, in the European theater, Western countries were still divided into two warring coalitions .Now they are demonstrating unity by their actions and are working out interaction very carefully. Realizing this, our leadership strengthens this direction by conventional means. Not intending to attack anywhere, nevertheless, these "conventional armies" are very much needed there by Russia in case it needs weighty and effective arguments in the post-Soviet space (Ukraine and Belarus in the first place). And the territory of Russia itself may find itself under severe economic and political pressure (primarily Kaliningrad). In the near future, such wars are not expected, but NATO's military activity will only increase.
  27. +2
    11 January 2017 13: 24
    so she said "... nothing to be afraid we are near. we will help you ask the Poles"
  28. +1
    11 January 2017 13: 42
    “The fifth article of the NATO statute states that we support any country against which military force is used. Some people think that America will change its attitude towards NATO [after Donald Trump’s arrival] ... I think America will remain committed to NATO just as we are, ”said Theresa May.

    The lady's megalomania. America is not committed to NATO - NATO is committed to America. And America will change its attitude towards NATO after Trump's arrival - "to work .... and / s". laughing
  29. +1
    11 January 2017 14: 12
    This fool, before opening her mouth with such statements, thought how it would technically look like? Are the brave "Tommy" protecting the sprat? Will they land in Normandy and drive through the whole gamerope? How long won't it get there ?! For purely technical reasons? Troops will be sent on ships across the Baltic. Is the example of "Guslov" and other "Steubens" really "inspiring"? Airborne landing? So how many of them will the S-400 fly by in one piece? The subway and tunnels from small britain to sprats have not yet been dug ...
  30. +1
    11 January 2017 14: 59
    Who would say, but not the Britons ...
  31. +1
    11 January 2017 18: 22
    the Yankees are already tired of financing what they themselves created (NATO), and the Anglo-Saxons always warmed their filthy little hands on someone else's fire, but the trump wasn’t ...
  32. 0
    12 January 2017 04: 56
    Read today:
    http://www.belvpo.com/ru/78624.html 11-01-2017
    “The defense and security of the Baltic states continues to be on the agenda of European politicians. British Prime Minister Theresa May said that her country will defend Estonia and Lithuania“ in the event of Russian aggression. ”The importance of such remarks and the military potential of the Baltic states to RuBaltic. Ru told by the head of the Department of Geography, Nature Management and Spatial Development of the IKBFU, the author of numerous works about the armies of the Baltic countries and NATO, Yuri ZVEREV:
    - Yuri Mikhailovich, responding to the “Russian threat”, the Baltic countries have been actively building up their own military power for three years. What did they manage to achieve? How has the situation changed in terms of combat readiness and defense capability of the Baltic republics?
    - First of all, purchases of certain types of weapons and military equipment, which the Baltic countries simply did not have, began. In particular, Lithuania purchased from the Bundeswehr the 155-millimeter self-propelled howitzers PzH 2000. Naturally used. "
    The end of the quote (but not the end of the article, the article is large, read)
    Used to escalate the threat, the Baltic states are selling used military equipment. This is an ordinary business. Everyone earns as best he can.
  33. 0
    12 January 2017 09: 20
    So, gentlemen of the Baltic states, you would not be happy with the fierce promises of Madame May.


    Ie, the author wants to say that the notions of the locals regarding "aggression" are not notions?

    Why even pay attention to empty political rhetoric?
  34. 0
    13 January 2017 17: 01
    Quote: Finches
    Every woman who comes into politics begins to pose as Margaret Thatcher or Indira Gandhi, but in the end they even do not reach Cicciolina ... laughing

    Well said! To Cicciolina exterior falls short.)
  35. +1
    13 January 2017 17: 30
    Recall the classics: Jonathan Lynn. Yes, Mr. Prime Minister:
    He clearly doubted that the containment policy could deter the Russians from attacking us. I had to clarify.
    “Because they will know: if they only try, I will press the button,” I said firmly.
    - Really click? - without hiding some pressure in his voice, he asked.
    - And what do you think is not necessary?
    - So you really click?
    “Yes, of course ... As a last resort.” “I thought again.” - At least I think I’ll press. No, I’ll definitely click! How else?
    - Excuse me, Mr. Prime Minister, but when exactly, in your opinion, can this extreme measure be applied?
    How when? It is obvious.
    - When the Russians invade Western Europe.
    Professor Rosenblum smiled indulgently.
    (...)
    “Okay,” the professor continued with an even more pleased look. - Then scenario number three. Suppose the Russians have somehow invaded West Germany, Belgium, Holland and France. Suppose their tanks and soldiers have already approached the English Channel. Suppose they intend to invade England. Will this be your “last resort”?
    I experienced extreme difficulty.
    “No, probably still not,” I said slowly.
    - I wonder why? - not hiding causticity, he asked. - Why not?
    And really, why not? There was a mess in my head. I struggled to figure out what was happening, but honestly, no matter how hard I tried, I couldn’t. Therefore, he muttered not quite clearly:
    “Because ... because we are ready to go to war only to protect ourselves.” But how can you protect yourself by committing outright suicide?
    - So when does the “last resort” come for you? The professor asked with a grin. - When are the Russians at Piccadilly? At the central station? At Buckingham Palace? When exactly? - Then he sat down and sat back with a pleased look by the fireplace.
  36. 0
    13 January 2017 18: 00
    Aggressive old woman !!! Bread is not in earnest barked !!! Horror !!!
  37. 0
    13 January 2017 18: 18
    You, author, do not confuse the salty with the red ... The interest of Britain at the beginning of the 20th century was to collide two countries that were gaining power: the Soviets and Germany, hence the logic of action. Today Germany is an ally, there is no need to bleed anyone, and access to the Baltic to close the Russian Federation is a matter of prime necessity - then still a powerful British fleet is able to exert a significant influence on the theoretical theater of military operations in the North ... and who else capitulated there in the 40th year? They would surrender to Helsinki, and this was the Moscow peace treaty, as a result of the dubious successes of the Red Army ... so you better dig into the history yourself before you sculpt the material ...
  38. +1
    13 January 2017 20: 47
    We must ask the right questions. And then the question is, not what they say, but for what? I recall that many preparations for the war began by frightening their citizens that the enemy was about to attack and the need to stop him ...
    I will add: "If you want peace, prepare for war"
  39. 0
    14 January 2017 01: 58
    And what will Russia do if the labuses block transit to the Kaliningrad region? And what will we Kaliningraders do? Ukraine has closed transit to Crimea, what prevents labuses from doing this?
  40. 0
    14 January 2017 17: 16
    Sprats perishable product, easy to poison. The stench of rotten fish in honor only with the Norwegians. They eat rotten food there.