Collection of brilliant quotes D. Trump
The more we open our arms, the easier it is to crucify us.
The Russians' trust turned out to be bought with just a couple of vague promises on the subject of rapprochement between Moscow and Washington. Statements by the future president D. Trump were eagerly picked up by the domestic media, and as a result, everyone, in a short time, had an unexpected sympathy for Trump. Any statements are now interpreted solely in favor of Russia, without regard to other facts accompanying the assumption of the office of 45 by the US President.
We are pleased to see such a new and ambiguous figure as president of the United States. Probably, therefore, so bold expectations. When Trump comes - and everything will change for the better!
But isn't it too early to make hasty conclusions?
"Vladimir Putin called me a" bright, talented person. " It is a great honor to receive such a compliment from a person highly respected in his country and beyond its borders. ”
- Trump about the President of the Russian Federation
“I think I’ll get along great with Vladimir Putin. I just think so. ”
- statement in July 2015 of the year
“I was in Moscow two years ago, and this is what I will say: you can get along with these people, and very well. You can make deals with them "
- Trump in an interview with Fox News in June 2016
“If we can do such a wonderful thing for our country as getting along with Russia, it would be amazing, I would really like to try”
- April 2016 of the year
It could have been wonderful, but less than five minutes had passed, as Trump began to say such things, which directly contradicts his recent statements about “friendship” with Russia.
“The fact that he [V. Putin] said good things about me, does not mean that it will help him in the negotiations. It won't help him at all. ”
- An interview from 17 in May 2016.
“Russia has broken the deal, now they are shooting, they are bombing, and everything is in the same spirit. This should be stopped and done quickly. ”
- October 5 2016 of the year, statement on the actions of the Russian HQs in Aleppo
Interesting, because literally last winter, Trump called for an implacable fight against ISIS (the organization is banned in Russia).
“I consider ISIS to be a very important issue, and I am very glad that Russia is striking at the Islamic State. In my opinion, they should continue this. ”
- Donald Trump in an interview with CBS, 11 February 2016
Yes, Trump's statements are not consistent. The last phrases are just confusing, and we start to lose the essence of the conversation. Whose interests are this person pursuing? And from what position should Trump's candidacy be discussed?
Our dear readers enthusiastically shared their expectations of the new US president:
The war party leaves with Obama, other characters come, and with other interests. Neocons lost! I think the new White House administration will significantly change the US policy
- comment on VO
I wonder where they read such bold predictions?
“We must strike at ISIS, a limited ground operation against the grouping is necessary”
- Trump in an interview with CBS, 18 July 2016 of the year
No unnecessary illusions here. The term "limited ground operation" in Igilovsky hell means a full-scale war involving infantry, artillery and armored vehicles (without which there is nowhere in the modern war). If Trump does offer such an intervention, then why is his policy more peaceful than his predecessors? Those who, under various pretexts, invaded Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq.
And note - no statements about the withdrawal of military contingents from the territory of Iraq and Afghanistan.
The following event destroying illusions about the “outgoing war party”:
Trump’s determination to head the Pentagon is determined by General James Mattis, nicknamed “mad dog”.
For the first time in 54, the US Defense Secretary will be a regular military officer. At the same time, the notorious Russophobe and supporter of tough measures.
"Trump's conciliatory stance towards Russia is based on weak awareness" - a quote from a recent speech by General Mattis (and we did not expect another from him).
Although the conciliatory position of Trump causes more and more doubts.
Gentlemen, imagine. If someone seriously intends to establish good relations with the former enemy, then you probably should have invited a less scandalous figure to the post of head of the Ministry of Defense. With a more positive attitude towards the “former rival,” with whom, it seems, a friendship is planned.
However, ask General Mattis about this.
“It's funny to shoot some people. I will tell you frankly - I love a good mess. ”
- Mattis's performance in front of military personnel flying to Afghanistan, 2005
"Iran represents the most serious threat to stability and peace in the Middle East."
- General Mattis, 2013
“There is a feeling that we [the United States] are retreating from our obligations towards our allies and partners, abandoning them to the mercy of fate”
- General Mattis, 2015
Trump and the arms race.
"The United States must significantly strengthen and expand its nuclear capabilities."
- Trump's December announcement, 2016
“The US Navy must return to combat and numerical strength, which we have not had since 1998. The number of warships should increase from 272 to 350 units. The staff number of the Navy should be increased by 50 thousand people "
- Trump statement to the Navy Times, November 2016
All this is very interesting, but let me find out what is good for Russia here?
Trump and NATO.
“We pay a disproportionate share in NATO. Why do we need it? If Russia attacks NATO, only those countries of the alliance that have fulfilled their obligations to the US need to be defended. ”
- Trump's statement in July 2016
This statement greatly encouraged all those who are concerned about the topic of NATO expansion, as well as the very fact of the presence of an unfriendly Alliance near the borders of Russia. But where do you see a hint at the rejection of NATO?
In this statement, Trump only hints at the need to reallocate spending in favor of other members of the Alliance. Today, only five of the NATO member 28 countries (of the Baltic countries, only Estonia) fulfill the statutory defense requirement requirement of at least 2% of their GDP. Donald Trump calls for this simple rule to be respected by all participants.
“Trump did not say that he wants to leave NATO,” he reproached those who want to get the protection of the United States, but still have not paid their contribution in the amount of 2%. And he is right. ”
- from the report of E. Kauntan, Director of the Department of Military Sciences of the Great Britain and NATO
The report also states that “the initiative of the new US President Donald Trump to revise NATO policy may positively influence the European Union and push its key participants to develop their own defense system". That is, instead of degrading, relying entirely on the military might of the United States, they will begin to develop their own defense potential, and we will get a dozen more not the weakest armies on our borders. And the Pentagon will reduce its spending and gain allies capable of independent actions on a regional scale.
Where is the benefit for Russia?
Attitude towards Hillary Clinton.
“If I become president, I will instruct the Attorney General to initiate a special investigation against Clinton. She lied so much that the attorney general had to do it, ”and, referring to Clinton, he added,“ You will be in prison. ”
- Trump's speech during the second debate, October 2016
“I have no desire to initiate an investigation into the case of Hillary. The Clinton family are good people. I don't want to hurt them. ”
- Trump's statement on the popular Sunday TV show “60 minutes,” two weeks after winning the election
Are you surprised? And nothing.
All high-ranking participants of the play played their roles. Everyone has their own interests, administrative and financial resources. All players know too much about each other, but prefer to refrain from clarifying relations in public. Epatage and elections in the past. Now is the time for moderate rhetoric and carefully considered decisions.
The wall on the border with Mexico is one of the key points of Trump's election program, mentioned in almost every speech before voters. In spite of all its obvious pre-election populism and practical impracticability that caused a storm of delight.
“I will build a great wall - and no one builds walls better than me, believe me, - it will be very inexpensive. I will build a big, big wall on the southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for it. Mark my words"
- from the 2015 performance of the year
On Sunday, 13 November 2016, during a televised speech, the already victorious Trump was again asked about the construction of the wall.
(B) - You will build a solid border wall?
(T) - In some parts of the border.
Conclusion
Well, gentlemen, we diverge. Once again, everyone was left with nothing, for as the Covenant says: do not make yourself an idol. Or someone seriously hoping for a "good Uncle Trump"? Come on!
Trump will undoubtedly change the White House’s policy towards Russia, but the question of who will be the main beneficiary in this stories? It creates a strong feeling that, unlike the democratic establishment under President Obama, Trump will cease to be scattered with empty statements and threats. In exchange, he will begin to carry out real reforms with the aim of strengthening the economy and the military power of the United States, as well as supporting allies. After all, as you know, who does - does not say, who says - does not.
Trump himself put it very clearly - “My goal is America. Make it great. ” The rest is not interesting to him.
Better yet, said General Mattis, with the wisdom of an old warrior who killed many and not in vain. “Be polite, professional. But always have a plan for how to destroy everyone who meets on the way. ”
Information