The Niva magazine about the duel of M.Yu. Lermontov

54
It is always interesting when you sit in the archive, and they bring you a yellow, greasy document, the first reader of which you become, or in the library, opening a journal more than a century ago, stumble upon interesting material on a topic to which interest is not lost even today. One of these topics is the fateful duel between Lermontov and Martynov (about which, at the way, my material, by the way, was my material, though not so much about it as about Lermontov’s military career in general). Much has been written about it, but ... everything that is written today is only a census of what was written once. Therefore, it is possible to understand my joy when, looking through the magazine “Niva” on the subject of searching for materials about the Anglo-Boer War, I suddenly came across an article about the duel of officer M.Yu. Lermontov. Moreover, it was clear from the material that it was first published in the Russian Review, and then reprinted by Niwa. This is exactly the case when we approach information sources. After all, what just did not write in the Soviet era about this duel. And that the king ordered him to be killed, and that a sniper shot from the mountain, and that all this was for the poem “Death of a Poet” (for a long time the king was waiting to settle scores with him) . But in 1899, they looked at all this differently; there was no politicization of this event. That is why, I think, it will be interesting to learn how it all happened with the filing of one of the most popular magazines of the Russian Empire. Naturally, “yati” and “phi” are removed from the text, otherwise it would not have been read at all, but the style and spelling are mostly preserved. So, imagine for a moment that 1899 is now the year, and we ... sit and read the magazine "Niva".


Modern monument at the duel site M.Yu. Lermontov. The place of the duel was determined in 1881 by a special commission.



“More than half a century has passed since the day of the fatal duel between Lermontov and Martynov; but so far neither the true reason, nor the real reason for this tragic accident was known to the Russian public. The son of Nikolai Solomonovich Martynov, who carried on himself half a century the grave nickname of the killer Lermontov, tells the Russian Review, in the words of his late father, the real history this duel.

We give here detailed extracts from this article, which, of course, cannot but interest readers of Niva.

Martynov, during his lifetime, was always under the yoke of remorse of his conscience, tormenting him with memories of his unfortunate duel, about which he did not like to talk at all, and only on Holy Week, and also on July 10, on the anniversary of his duel, did he tell more or less less detail his story.

The Martynov family, living permanently in Moscow and having, like Grandma Lermontov, Arsenyev, a manor in the Penza province, had long been in excellent relations with the family of the poet from the maternal side. It is not surprising, therefore, that Mikhail Yuryevich Lermontov, living in Moscow in the late twenties and early thirties, often visited the home of his father Martynov, whom he met his daughters, and one of them, Natalia Solomonovna, later Countess De-Turdon, liked him very much .


House of the poet in Pyatigorsk

In 1837, fate again brought the poet to Martynov in the Caucasus, where Lermontov was exiled, as you know, for his poems “To Pushkin's Death”, and Martynov was transferred as a volunteer from a cavalier regiment. In the summer of this year, his sick father came to Pyatigorsk on the waters, accompanied by his entire family, including Natalie, who at the time was an 18-year-old and had grown into a magnificent beauty.

Once at the end of September, Martynov arrived in the detachment of Lermontov, who, having taken out of his wallet 300 p. in banknotes, he explained to him that this money had been sent to him from Pyatigorsk by his father, and were together with Natalie's letter in a large envelope, which was kept in a suitcase stolen from him in the city of Taman by a gypsy. “For whom do you take me, Lermontov, so that I agree to accept from you the money that was stolen from you - I don’t know, but I won’t take this money from you, and I don’t need it,” answered Martynov. “I can’t leave them at home either, and if you don’t accept them from me, then I will present them on your behalf to the songs of your regiment,” Lermontov answered, and then, with Martynov’s consent, he sent for the songwriters, which they After hearing a dashing Cossack song, on behalf of Martynov gave the money.

Martynov 5 of October 1837 wrote to his father: “Three hundred rubles that you sent me through Lermontov received, but no letters, because he was robbed on the road and this money invested in the letter was also lost; but he, of course, gave me his. " In this letter, apparently, Martynov, unwilling, probably, to disturb his father with the news that he did not accept money from Lermontov and that he himself was sitting penniless, hid this circumstance from him. During a personal meeting with his father and sisters, Martynov learned from them that Lermontov, living in Pyatigorsk and seeing each other daily, somehow announced to them that he was going to the detachment where he would see him, and then asked Natalia Solomonovna to send a letter with him to brother She agreed and, putting her Pyatigorsk diary and a letter to her brother in a large envelope, handed it to her father, asking him if he would like to add anything from himself. “Well, bring me your letter, and I, perhaps, will add something else from myself,” answered the father, who knew that the son in the detachment might need money, and invested three hundred rubles in banknotes in his letter, and not his daughter Nor did I say a word to Lermontov about it. “I think,” said Martynov’s father, “that if Lermontov found out that three hundred rubles was invested in the letter, then he opened the letter.” In his opinion, Lermontov, instigated by curiosity, wanted to know what opinion of him his girlfriend, for whom he wrote one of the poems under the heading “I, Mother of God, Now with Prayer,” etc., revealed the letter and, finding 300 rubles in it, which he was not warned about, and seeing the impossibility of concealing the actions done, came up with a story about the casket being stolen from him by a Gypsy woman and brought money to Martynov.

Subsequently, in 1840, Lermontov, in his defense, placed in the “Hero of Our Time” a separate story “Taman”, in which he described this incident.

Anyway, after this incident, Lermontov, feeling completely guilty before Martynov and wanting to admit this act, began to bother him in every possible way with his sarcasm, so that he once in a close friendly circle warned him that he could only endure his words yourself at home or in a circle of friends, but not in the ladies' society; Lermontov bit his lip and walked away without saying a word.


And this is the decor of one of the rooms of this dwelling.

For some time, he really ceased to annoy Martynov with his venomous mockery, but then forgot his warning and again started on the old.

In the summer of 1841, Mr. Martynov, having retired for the duration of his service, arrived in Pyatigorsk, where at that time all the “jeunesse doree”, serving from the Caucasus, as well as visitors from Russia, had gathered. They spent time having fun: there were balls, routs, carnivals and other amusements every day.

Of the young ladies, the young girls of Versyline, the daughters of Pyatigorsk old inhabitant, Versylina, especially attracted attention. Among them, especially distinguished by its beauty and wit, Emilia Alexandrovna.

Somehow, in the last days of June or in the first days of July, in the evening at the Werzilins of Lermontov and Martynov, as usual, they courted Emilia Alexandrovna.

Martynov was accustomed to take up a dagger with his hand, the obligatory accessory of the Caucasian Cossack costume, which he, who had just come from the Grebensky regiment, continued to wear.


The living room in the house of the Big Brothers, where this all happened ...

After talking for a while with Emilia Alexandrovna, Martynov walked a few steps away from her, and, as usual, took the dagger's handle, and he immediately heard the mocking words of Lermontov, Mrs. Verzilina “Apres quoi Martynow croit de son devoir de se metre en position” (After which Martynov considers himself obliged to return the position.) Martynov clearly heard these words, but being a well-bred man and not wanting to take up history in the family house, he was silent and did not say a single word to Lermontov, so that, according to Vasilchikov, none of those who had clashed him I didn’t notice the news with Lermontov, but when I left the house of the Big Brothers, he took Lermontov by the arm on the boulevard and went on with him. "Je vous ai prevenu, Lermontow, que je ne souffrirais plus vos sarcasmes dans le monde, et cependant vous recommencez de nouveau" ("I warned you, Lermontov, that I no longer intend to endure in the company of your poisonous mockery, but you take up old), Martynov told him in French, and added in Russian in a calm tone: "I will make you stop." “But you know, Martynov, that I am not afraid of the duel and will never give up on it,” Lermontov answered with bile. “Well, in that case, tomorrow you will have my seconds,” said Martynov and went to his home, where that evening he invited his friend Leib-Hussar officer Glebov, whom he asked for the next morning than light, to go to Lermontov and pass him a formal challenge to a duel. Glebov, returning from Lermontov, told Martynov that he had received him and that Lermontov had chosen Prince Alexander Illarionovich Vasilchikov as his official second.

The bout was scheduled for 15 on July 1841 of the year at 6 and a half hours in the evening, at the foot of Mashuk Mountain, half a vertex from Pyatigorsk.

Although Martynov was well aware that Lermontov had an excellent possession of a pistol, from which he shot almost without a miss, and Martynov himself, as is well certified by the second Glebov, did not know how to shoot, ... nevertheless, with the carelessness of his youth - he was only 25 Years, at the end of the fifth hour, he ordered to ride his trotter, and he gave up his running jerks to his second, Glebov.


Living room at home A.A. Alyabyev - author of the famous "Nightingale". Then about all the people of the corresponding class lived.

The day was extremely sweltering and hot: there was an approaching thunderstorm in the air. Arriving at the duel with Glebov at the same time as Lermontov and Vasilchikov, they found the seconds there - Trubetskoy and Stolypin and many other common friends in Pyatigorsk, numbering up to forty people.

Bearing in mind that Martynov’s clash with Lermontov happened, as was said above, around June 29, and the duel itself took place almost two weeks later, it is clear that the news of her had already spread throughout Pyatigorsk. Glebov and Vasilchikov didn’t say a word about the audience’s presence in order not to subject them to responsibility for allowing and not reporting about it.

The barrier was determined by the seconds to fifteen steps, and on both sides a pile of stones was laid, and from it, ten steps each, were duelists who had the right to shoot from their place or go to the barrier.

Opponents were given a pistol in their hands, and one of the seconds waved his handkerchief in a sign that the duel had begun. Lermontov stood in breeches and a red Kanaus shirt, and with apparent or real carelessness began to eat cherries and spit out bones. He stood in his place, hiding behind his hand and a pistol, and pointing the latter directly at Martynov.

A minute passed, showing, as happens in such cases, with all the present eternity. Neither Lermontov nor Martynov fired and stood in their places. The seconds and those present began shivering and making remarks between themselves, which partly reached Martynov's ear. “We need to finish,” said someone, “we are already wet through.” Martynov walked quickly to the barrier, pointed the gun at Lermontov and fired ...

When the smoke cleared, he saw Lermontov lying motionless on the ground. His body was twitching with light convulsions, and when Martynov rushed to say goodbye to him, Lermontov was already dead.

From the place of the duel, Martynov went to the commandant, to whom he announced the unfortunate event. The commandant ordered to arrest him and both seconds, and the investigation began, at the beginning of which Martynov learned from Glebov that during negotiations on the conditions of the duel Lermontov had told his second Vasilchikov: “No, I am so guilty before Martynov that I feel my hand it will not rise. " Whether Lermontov hinted at the opening of the letter or the absurdity of his outburst at the evening with the Verzilins, Martynov was left unknown, but his son still vividly remembers the words of his father: "Tell me about these words Vasilchikov or whoever, I would extend a hand of reconciliation to our Lermontov, and duel, of course, would not be ".

Martynov, having spent his entire previous life in military service, petitioned to betray him to a military court, not a civilian court.

His request was respected, and Martynov was sentenced to a deprivation of the ranks and all rights of the state by a maxim of the Pyatigorsk military court, which maxim was at first softened by the commander of the left flank, then the commander-in-chief in the Caucasus, the war minister and the emperor Nicholas I, who was 3. January 1842 of the year put the following resolution: "Mayor Martynov stand in the fortress for three months, and then bring it to church repentance."

About two years before his death, General Velyaminov told Martynov’s second son that Emperor Nicholas I, who usually spent his summer in Peterhof, where Velyaminov was in cameras in 1841, and who used to collect all those present after the holidays on holidays his retinues, who were informed of the most interesting news he received, expressed the following about Lermontov’s death: “Today I received sad news: our poet Lermontov, who gave such great hopes to Russia, was killed in a duel. Russia has lost a lot in it. ”
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    28 November 2016 06: 48
    Thank! Interesting topic.
  2. +8
    28 November 2016 07: 07
    In general, the difficult character of Lermontov and the chain of worldly accidents of that time led to this tragedy.
  3. +6
    28 November 2016 07: 59
    After all, what just did not write about the duel in Soviet times. And that it was the king who ordered him to be killed, and that a sniper was shooting from the mountain, and that all this is the poem "The Poet's Death"
    .... I understand this sarcasm .. But we didn’t tell this nonsense at the literature lessons, and I didn’t hear about it at lectures at the university .. Vyacheslav, you can indicate the source where such nonsense was written, it’s just interesting to read ...
    1. +2
      28 November 2016 09: 42
      Here in Penza, two local authors made a play about Lermontov ... For a long time. I sat on it ... And there a shot rang out from the mountain! We have Tarkhany nearby ... And local Lermontologists who have not put forward any hypotheses. So I won’t tell you the source, but it’s definitely not fiction - Penza in VO also read.
      1. 0
        28 November 2016 10: 16
        It’s clear that local mythology .. In our Taman Lermontov Museum they didn’t think of such nonsense ... It will be necessary to tell .. but somehow the interest has subsided to the poet .. Need to tell me something ... sort of ... Lermontov’s meeting with mermaid, fortune telling on the tail ..
        1. 0
          28 November 2016 19: 13
          I was in Taman and the museum there. But there is a completely different atmosphere. By the way, as in Tarkhany, where everything breathes Lermontov. But there were people who wanted to make "their contribution!" Here is a play written (with terrible costumes!), A lot of things. Now it has decreased.
        2. Cat
          +1
          28 November 2016 21: 45
          In Taman, in the Lermontov Museum, and I confirm, the atmosphere was special, it was perceived as a short moment of meeting with the poet. There is an awareness of sadness, you know the future. But imbued with the present. Of the lofty feelings, I was "carried away" by something else - a cast-iron carranada of 1836 cast at my native Kamensky plant. From this weakness of mine, my wife and daughter "tore off" for about 30 minutes. Well, I'm terrible with that! For example, in the Kremlin from the French trophies, I was driven away by the FSOs. But after this "native corranada" in the poet's house, Lermontov read avidly, he himself did not expect this from himself.
          1. +1
            28 November 2016 22: 57
            I have a similar story with these French cannons ... And I got to the Kremlin in 1961, saw them and ran - "Mom, I'm going to the guns!" And then the road in front of them was a carriageway, not a checkpoint and the sidewalk was separated from the carriageway by a fence. Well, I'm under it and there. And the police are already whistling - "Take, child." How will my mother catch me behind the fence? She's them - catch! They are me - I am from them. Everyone around is eating! Mom waves her hand ... Well, I realized to her too! "Barely saved!"
      2. +2
        28 November 2016 11: 13
        The Penza authors who composed the play apparently ripped off the plot from Conan Doyle's story "Holmes's Last Case" about the duel between Sherlock Holmes and Professor Moriarty, where the latter was helped by a shooter hiding on the mountain. :-)
      3. +2
        28 November 2016 12: 06
        But I wonder if these same authors have ever been to a duel? What mountain could you shoot from there? With Mashuk? The slope there is very gentle and forested, this is clearly visible in the photo. From Beshtau? So there is such a distance that a modern sniper rifle will not help.
        1. +1
          28 November 2016 19: 16
          That was a long time ago. I was not in Pyatigorsk myself at that time. He sat in the theater and watched. I saw only discrepancies in the uniform, well, the play itself did not like. Well, as I visited, and I was there 4 times, then yes ... fantasy.
        2. 0
          6 February 2021 14: 34
          Many people simply believe that Pyatigorsk is located among the mountains. If the Caucasus means mountains everywhere.)))
  4. +4
    28 November 2016 08: 06
    I liked the article, thanks to the author, and Martynov is shown objectively, and not by an evil and narrow-minded person, as they sometimes like to imagine him.
    1. +4
      28 November 2016 11: 18
      But we should not forget that Martynov is shown from the words of Martynov himself and his son. For a more accurate and objective picture, the testimonies of people less interested are needed.
      1. +4
        28 November 2016 11: 44
        But the fact that Lermontov literally tormented Martynov with ridicule - there is a lot of evidence for that. At that time, it remained only to challenge him to a duel.
      2. +1
        30 November 2016 14: 31
        The article is really interesting, especially its narration on behalf of one of the "heroes".
        In particular, the "whitewashing" in this article of one "and Martynov himself, as fully certified by his second Glebov, did not know how to shoot at all ..."
        , and the other’s unsubstantiated accusation “that if Lermontov found out that three hundred rubles were invested in the letter, he opened the letter”
        From the biography of Martynov (this is certainly not "NIVA")
        ".... during the military expedition of the Caucasian detachment across the Kuban River, Nikolai Solomonovich Martynov showed himself to be a brave officer. For military services he was even awarded the Order of St. Anna with a bow, and he was in good standing with the command.
        The circumstances were such that Nikolai Martynov could well hope for a successful career. However, for the still unexplained reason in 1841, being in the rank of major (we recall that practically his peer Lermontov at that time was only the lieutenant), he unexpectedly filed for resignation. They talked that the young man was forced to do this because he was caught cheating during a card game, which was considered an extremely shameful phenomenon among officers. In favor of such rumors, many cited the fact that Nikolai Martynov, who had sufficient financial means and connections, did not return to the capital, but settled away from society in Pyatigorsk and led a reclusive life. Among vacationers and local Russian society, the former major was known as an eccentric and original, as he dressed up in the clothes of mountaineers and walked around with a huge dagger, causing ridicule from his former colleagues. "

        He is right! Our friend Monkey is not Solomon,
        But Solomon’s son,
        Not wise as King Shalim, but smart
        Smarter than the Jews.
        That temple was erected, and became known to all
        Harem and court
        And this temple, and the court and his harem
        It carries in itself.

        1841, Mikhail Lermontov
  5. +5
    28 November 2016 08: 29
    Vyacheslav Olegovich, good morning! The version is interesting. But the nominal version. She was nominated by Martynov's son. Perhaps its source is "Son for Father". Opening someone else's letter was a very serious offense for the officer, defaming his Honor. Did M.Yu. Lermontov perform it? This is the question.
    1. +4
      28 November 2016 09: 43
      Good morning and good day to you too! Of course, this is a question ... That is why the material is given "one to one".
  6. +8
    28 November 2016 08: 47
    "As a poet, Lermontov rose to genius, but as a person, he would be petty and unbearable. These flaws and a sign of reckless stubbornness in them were the cause of the death of the genius poet from a shot made by the hand of a kind, heartfelt man, whom Lermontov brought with his ridicule and even slander almost insane ". (Arsenyev, 1989, pp. 56-57.)
    What can I say ... A brilliant poet, a brave honest officer and a man with a very bad character ... Everyone in him will make his choice.
    1. +2
      28 November 2016 09: 45
      Yes, but how else could an officer react to constant ridicule?
      1. +2
        28 November 2016 09: 50
        Yes, and in the presence of the ladies ...
    2. +3
      28 November 2016 10: 20
      Andrey, that's the Honest Officer. Opening other people's letters is a dishonor for an officer. The question, "Was there a boy?", And whether M.Yu. Lermontov did it? V.O.Shpakovsky gives us a version proposing conclusions to be drawn by ourselves. This is normal. Everyone sees something different and evaluates it in their own way.
  7. +5
    28 November 2016 09: 57
    "And Martynov himself, as Glebov's second confirmed, did not know how to shoot at all ..." - sounds strange about a major who served in the Caucasus).
    And by the way, it would be better to leave the old spelling. It seems at first glance that it is difficult to read. By the middle of the article, the "old" letters would be read quite normally.
    1. 0
      28 November 2016 19: 18
      I will keep in mind, but not everyone will like "yati" and "fit". I didn't know how to shoot - so in the text!
  8. +4
    28 November 2016 10: 53
    An example of a stupid conflict that received a sad continuation ... as in that joke, "like this, word for word, joke for joke, the hedgehog got it in the head."
    the article broadens the mind. It turns out that Martynov had a family (Wikipedia is silent about this, I was sure that he remained single and remained single). Then I read about Martynov - it turns out he was a cousin of the founder of the Russian historical novel Zagoskin, also from Penza.
  9. +2
    28 November 2016 12: 36
    In place of Martynov, it was necessary to recognize who Lermontov was. A normal person would have shot in the air and dispersed peacefully.
    1. +3
      28 November 2016 12: 56
      Lermontov literally ran into death, the impression that he was looking for it, this is evident from the poems, and by the way he fought, very bravely, but to recklessness.
      1. +1
        28 November 2016 13: 01
        If a genius man does not behave quite ordinary, then he must be taken and killed. There is no other way out?
        1. +2
          28 November 2016 13: 06
          But this ingenious man could have killed Martynov, they were on an equal footing; otherwise, in those days, questions of honor did not solve.
          1. +3
            28 November 2016 13: 40
            Some duels ended peacefully. And it seems that Lermontov was peacefully disposed. In the end, Martynov could transfer to another part, where he was not annoyed.
            1. +2
              28 November 2016 13: 56
              Both were adults, officers. Received an excellent noble upbringing and education. And of course they went to church for confession. And so take and kill your friend.
              A friend was the second poet of Russia.
              1. 0
                28 November 2016 14: 24
                The second poet of Russia composed poems of a demonic nature, the nobility of that time was more oriented to the French style, this education was not so beautiful.
            2. +1
              28 November 2016 13: 58
              He would have been peacefully disposed, so he would not have insulted him, and why did Martynov need to be transferred to another part?
  10. +2
    28 November 2016 13: 54
    And what does the sovereign-emperor have to do with sending Lermontov to the Caucasus for the poem "To the Death of a Poet", and after a tragic duel suddenly regrets the disgraced officer and even recognizes his originality.
    1. +3
      28 November 2016 14: 01
      The tsar did the right thing that he exiled to the Caucasus, it was necessary to know the measure of what was permissible, which Lermontov did not have, including regarding insults. The fact that the tsar pitied him then was so generous.
      1. +2
        28 November 2016 14: 30
        And how did Martynov defend his honor? The sovereign punished him severely. Martynov went down in history forever as a killer of a poet. And during his life he was hated by compatriots.
        1. +1
          28 November 2016 14: 35
          And during his life he was hated by compatriots. The anger of the crowd is a terrible thing
          1. +2
            28 November 2016 14: 54
            This is not anger, but an assessment of this person by society.
            1. +3
              28 November 2016 15: 01
              The mood of this society itself is very variable, and society itself is often an ordinary rabble, even with an excellent education.
              1. +2
                28 November 2016 15: 39
                Then tell us about the remarkable personality of Martynov.
                1. +1
                  28 November 2016 16: 57
                  He (Martynov) did not compose verses, was not carried away, he was interested in Mrs. Verzilina, and so he briefly told.
                  1. +3
                    28 November 2016 19: 23
                    Here's something that he wrote and not bad! But other than Lermontov: "If he pours needles into the barrel - bang, the Chechen is flying from a horse!" Like these ones. They were rivals on the battlefield. Lermontov commanded something like a rapid reaction unit, and Martynov commanded army special forces.
  11. +1
    28 November 2016 22: 28
    Hmm, Mr. Shpakovsky cannot but prick about the Soviet era! Well, such a man! I recommend everyone to read Kalbanov’s book from the Puppeteer series! There, Lermontov’s relations with Martynov are well described! For example, as he calls Martynov a monkey!
  12. +1
    28 November 2016 22: 33
    But they had been friends since childhood, so Martynov put up with Lermontov for so long! Lermontov generally had a very mean and sarcastic language !!!
    1. 0
      29 November 2016 10: 47
      And if Lermontov had great lips, would he be a poet?
  13. 0
    29 November 2016 11: 38
    I would not kill, went down in history simply as one of the friends of the great poet. And so he went down in history with a minus sign forever.
    1. 0
      29 November 2016 19: 50
      In such cases they say - stuck in history, and not to otmazatsya after all, neither then, nor now, in this very society.
  14. 0
    29 November 2016 16: 40
    Thanks for the article, Vyacheslav Olegovich.
    Still, it was florid at that time in the newspapers, and it was somehow warm. Now the main information is to fit more bits into fewer characters.
    So it turns out that he seemed to know that Martynov was a "hero of our time" Lermontov got drunk with jokes, but just dry information, and the article allowed us to look at this from a slightly different angle, as a misunderstanding of two old friends, or something ...
    Vyacheslav, but interesting:
    Lermontov stood in breeches and a red canaous shirt, and with apparent or real carelessness began to eat cherries and spit out the bones.

    Was it Lermontov himself who slammed Pushkin's idea? Martynov embellished? Or did the "newspaperman" decide to add drama?
    1. 0
      30 November 2016 18: 22
      No. Many participants in the duel later wrote that Lermontov was dressed exactly like that, and the color of the shirt was RED!
      1. 0
        30 November 2016 20: 49
        I'm talking about cherries. In Pushkin's story "Shot", the whole plot is tied from exactly the same scene.
        I can lie, but it seems that Pushkin himself once during a duel with an officer ate cherries.
  15. +2
    29 November 2016 17: 22
    A very realistic version. In duels for everyone
    quite stupid reasons, many young people died
    both in Russia and in Europe. Pushkin and Lermontov were vivid examples
    dead geniuses, but hundreds perished.
  16. 0
    5 December 2016 01: 03
    Quote: alexej123
    Andrey, that's the Honest Officer. Opening other people's letters is a dishonor for an officer. The question, "Was there a boy?", And whether M.Yu. Lermontov did it? V.O.Shpakovsky gives us a version proposing conclusions to be drawn by ourselves. This is normal. Everyone sees something different and evaluates it in their own way.

    Shpakovsky, if you have not noticed, simply "one to one" provided the material of the archival source. What are the claims to him?
  17. 0
    10 March 2017 14: 05
    It is interesting that there is a different version of the duel itself (they even showed it on TV), that Lermontov was wounded, but the audience ran away in fear and seconds, that Lermontov lay for several hours in the rain (even though it coincides!) Without medical assistance, from which he died. And if medical assistance was rendered right away, he could still live and live ... And which of these versions is true? Immediately killed or died of refusal of medical care due to fear of witnesses to a duel?
  18. 0
    6 February 2021 14: 45
    Well ... it's quite an everyday situation, without any conspiracy.