Washington urges Moscow not to deploy Iskander in the Kaliningrad region

83
The State Department called on Russia not to deploy the Iskander and C-400 complexes near Kaliningrad, since this “destabilizes European security,” reports RIA News.





“We understand that Russia has the right to deploy conventional nuclear forces on its territory. The deployment of Iskander and C-400 in Kaliningrad will destabilize European security, ”said State Department spokesman John Kirby.

According to him, Russia has already promised 20 for years to deploy Iskanders in the Kaliningrad region "in response to various situations in Europe, none of which required such a military response."

“We also call on Russia to refrain from actions that are not consistent with ensuring stability and security in the Euro-Atlantic region,” Kirby added.

Earlier, Viktor Ozerov, head of the Federation Council’s defense committee, told the agency that “in response to the deployment of American missile defense in Europe, Russia will have to strengthen the aerospace defense system in the western direction and use additional forces and means to cover relevant facilities and control points”. According to him, this reinforcement includes the deployment of C-400 systems and Iskander complexes near Kaliningrad, as well as the creation of new connections in the Western and Southern districts.
83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +35
    22 November 2016 09: 31
    laughing a talking head from Washington laughed.

    Why the hell are their boltology laid out? See other news dumb.
    1. +53
      22 November 2016 09: 33
      Yes, not only laughed ...
      It sounds something like this: we want to hit you, and you need to defend yourself - it’s undemocratic ...
      1. +24
        22 November 2016 09: 46
        For the last 20 years, Russia has promised to place Iskanders in the Kaliningrad Region “in response to various situations in Europe

        They are already secretly chuckling at our intentions to place the Iskander.
        I believe that the Iskander should have been installed for a long time, and not to scare - that we will post as soon as the pro elements appear in Europe. Let them get used to a tough stance
      2. +1
        22 November 2016 09: 51
        John just forgot to send in the morning, so he became apparent laughing
      3. +7
        22 November 2016 09: 56
        Absolutely crazy, it's like the Germans in Stalingrad would have asked not to use the Katyusha. There is no amergos' insolence of the chapel.
      4. +4
        22 November 2016 10: 50
        and it’s not so much to hit - no, we want to cut you off and tear away, take off your pants and turn your back!
      5. WKS
        0
        22 November 2016 11: 18
        Quote: Skeptic Self-taught
        Yes, not only laughed ...
        It sounds something like this: we want to hit you, and you need to defend yourself - it’s undemocratic ...

        And I would interpret it this way: "We want to smack you on your bare ass, but at the same time you must take off your pants yourself and not twitch or yell during the whipping."
    2. +33
      22 November 2016 09: 35
      Washington urges Moscow not to deploy Iskander in the Kaliningrad region
      where then? in Cuba or what? belay
      1. +10
        22 November 2016 09: 42
        Yes, no problem .. Get out of Europe and you will be happy ..
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Washington urges Moscow not to deploy Iskander in the Kaliningrad region
        where then? in Cuba or what? belay
      2. +34
        22 November 2016 10: 01
        Good to you, the last homeless person understands that the Iskanders in Kaliningrad against North Korea
        1. +1
          22 November 2016 15: 02
          Romanov, you continue to pleasantly surprise, put a plus.
    3. +10
      22 November 2016 09: 35
      The lack of logic in the speeches of Kirby, this is the logic of the actions of the State Department.
      1. +13
        22 November 2016 09: 38
        Quote: Giant thought
        The lack of logic in the speeches of Kirby, this is the logic of the actions of the State Department.

        They used to demand and threaten, now they are asking (then they will beg ...?) ... Russia began to speak their language simply and immediately the result appeared ... (Let Churkin, at least have a little rest at the UN ..)))
      2. +15
        22 November 2016 09: 43
        Giant of thought ..... Lack of logic in Kirby's speeches

        As soon as Psaki would give birth, it was much more fun with her than with this stupid admiral.
      3. +3
        22 November 2016 10: 36
        Apparently, the State Department has such a tradition - to appoint offs. representatives of only complete idios ... half a day ... well, extraordinary personalities, in short. Although, maybe everyone is there? wassat
    4. +21
      22 November 2016 09: 38
      State Department spokesman John Kirby said.

      Return Psak, looking in the face of this parquet hysteria and boor, just want to pull him between his eyes, and Zhenya would send to the Rostov Mountains and the Belorussian Sea and after tearing the beads, she would go to the office to clarify.
      1. +5
        22 November 2016 10: 09
        There they choose hysterics by competition .. Well, then the days are numbered, though another tantrum will come .. The policy of Amers is unchanged
        Quote: vovanpain
        State Department spokesman John Kirby said.

        Return Psak, looking in the face of this parquet hysteria and boor, just want to pull him between his eyes, and Zhenya would send to the Rostov Mountains and the Belorussian Sea and after tearing the beads, she would go to the office to clarify.
    5. +4
      22 November 2016 09: 41
      From January, he will begin to perform as a comedian on the show, he knows the words, the face is suitable.
    6. +2
      22 November 2016 09: 55
      Well, remove the missile defense system from Europe, there will be no Iskander. How much we talked about this, do not meddle in Europe and there will be no response.
      1. +13
        22 November 2016 09: 57
        No, let the Iskanders stay ... So it sleeps better for me personally ...
        And the fact that Europe has a bad dream or someone else is their problem ...
    7. +2
      22 November 2016 10: 03
      Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
      a talking head from Washington laughed.

      He will recommend us to surrender))) Iskander and bastions in the Kaliningrad region to be !!!
    8. +2
      22 November 2016 10: 18
      Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
      laughing talking head from washington.

      Why the hell with them.

      Washington calls ...
      Who is listening to this Vooshin - tone? Albatsikha, Basiloshvilya, Sabchachka? Ah, well, I forgot Akhudzhakov ... True democrats
    9. +1
      22 November 2016 10: 18
      09.31. Igor Gordeev! Yeah! They made a laugh. We can’t place rockets, but it’s possible for the Americans! Our rockets bother them! And refugees in Europe do not care at all?
    10. +1
      22 November 2016 10: 25
      Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
      Placing Iskander and S-400 missiles in Kaliningrad destabilizes European security


      And what?

      We are not going to attack you!

      But WE ARE forced to take all necessary measures to protect the sovereignty of our territories!
  2. +9
    22 November 2016 09: 31
    And you would go far away with your calls! You were asked not to place missile defense systems near the borders of the Russian Federation, so now eat what you brewed yourself.
  3. +31
    22 November 2016 09: 32
    Ahaha! We also place "Bastions" there!
    "Put the dog on a chain," the burglar demanded from the owner of the house, "she scares the whole village!"
  4. +9
    22 November 2016 09: 33
    The State Department urged Russia not to deploy Iskander and S-400 systems near Kaliningrad, as it "destabilizes European security"

    “We understand that Russia has the right to deploy conventional nuclear forces on its territory.

    We don’t need to deploy missile defense in Europe ourselves, then we won’t need to shake the air, and the deployment of the Iskander and S-400 takes place on our territory am
  5. +5
    22 November 2016 09: 36
    We are not a threat, we are a democracy. Why are you blocking yourself from us?
    Like children damn ...
  6. +1
    22 November 2016 09: 38
    We’ve been posting something for a long time .... It's high time!
  7. +6
    22 November 2016 09: 42
    No, well, listen! How much can you listen to this fellow ravings. Yes, he says one thing in the morning, and in the evening he says the exact opposite. The stand at the head of the Pentagon or NATO obliges to lie, wriggle and brazenly refute the truth. Well, the way the wind blows, but the caravan will still continue to go! Well, let's seriously shout: NATO - do not deploy troops near our borders. They won’t even read these cries, and we are discussing these empty statements of an empty blank from NATO and the Pentagon. We will be polite to each other and will respect each other, and not debate the snotty wet opinions and ravings of this man. Is he a man? You won’t understand them there. Today he is a football player, an idol for girls from all over the world, and tomorrow he is a gay and rear-wheel drive hero of the rainbow community of nations ...
  8. +4
    22 November 2016 09: 43
    And let's install missile defense in Europe? And if they are Iskanders against us? And then for what?
  9. +7
    22 November 2016 09: 44
    Refrain from the ABM system in Romania and Poland and you will be happy. And remove your tanks from the brave Baltic.
  10. +2
    22 November 2016 09: 45
    We understand that Russia has the right to deploy conventional nuclear forces on its territory

    And if you understand, don’t lament, but stop deploying missile defense in Eastern Europe and nuclear forces along the perimeter of our borders.
  11. +2
    22 November 2016 09: 47
    And we have a counter-request: Remove the troops from the Baltic states and missile defense from Poland and we will be happy ....
  12. +1
    22 November 2016 09: 48
    Washington takes Russia for the Papuans, if it puts forward such calls ..
  13. 0
    22 November 2016 09: 48
    well, it’s ... turn the entire military infrastructure in the ass by the time of the dissolution of the internal affairs department ... everything is simple with them ... ABM is possible at our borders, but we cannot use the S-400 in Kaliningrad ...
  14. +2
    22 November 2016 09: 50
    The State Department urged Russia not to deploy Iskander and S-400 systems near Kaliningrad, as it "destabilizes European security"

    American bases, sponsoring terrorists around the world, the desire to control hydrocarbon deposits and their transportation routes, and the patronage of drug mafia destabilize the safety of earthlings. Yankees, sit at home, the world is tired of you.angry
  15. +2
    22 November 2016 09: 51
    “We understand that Russia has the right to deploy conventional nuclear forces on its territory. The deployment of Iskander and C-400 in Kaliningrad will destabilize European security, ”said State Department spokesman John Kirby.

    Apologize to Gayane, for starters. stop
  16. +2
    22 November 2016 09: 53
    Get ready on foot erotic journey wink
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +2
    22 November 2016 09: 58
    (The State Department urged Russia not to deploy Iskander and S-400 systems near Kaliningrad, as this would "destabilize European security")

    To mister "talking parrot": already placed, BUT ... But we swear by Lenin's mummy that we will remove it next week after NATO removes its structures on the left bank of the Elbe. We give the tooth. bully
  19. +3
    22 November 2016 10: 05
    The translation goes something like this - do not place Iskanders in the Kaliningrad region, and S-400 too - we have nothing to "cover" with.
  20. +1
    22 November 2016 10: 10
    Again, they’ll knock it over from a sore head to a healthy one ... Volodya told them to remove nuclear weapons from Europe — they don’t hear or listen .. Here they asked for a mirror answer.
  21. +1
    22 November 2016 10: 15
    Let's put on the Iskanders already! Despite all squeals and calls. We will begin to be respected only when we begin to react harshly to every attack by our "partners".
  22. 0
    22 November 2016 10: 23
    Placing Iskander is our marketing ploy. Do you want, dear partners, to buy ... a little peace of mind?
  23. +1
    22 November 2016 10: 25
    Once profukuyu transfer Iskander and once again profuka. One word-CLOUNDS!)
  24. +1
    22 November 2016 10: 27
    The US State Department should first think about removing American weapons from Europe. After that, no one will need Europe and no one will threaten it. Just something to do!
  25. 0
    22 November 2016 10: 29
    We understand that Russia has the right to deploy conventional nuclear forces on its territory.
    Judging by the tone of the statements, the "client" is almost ripe for productive negotiations with us. We can remove Iskander from there, no question. But what will we have for this? What concrete steps is the American side ready to take to resolve this issue, to ensure stability and security in the Euro-Atlantic region? For some reason I remember the "Cuban missile crisis" and how it was resolved. What did America do then, don't you forget?
  26. +1
    22 November 2016 10: 31
    In contrast, we have deployed missiles on our territory. And we warned not to stir the missile defense elements near our borders. And then on you "and we are for sho ?!" we suddenly delivered what we promised. And now "they are calling!" And they would not go on an erotic walking route. Don't know where it is? Come and explain.
  27. 0
    22 November 2016 10: 32
    Well then, we will not post ....
  28. +3
    22 November 2016 10: 37
    “We understand that Russia has the right to deploy conventional nuclear forces on its territory. The deployment of Iskander and C-400 in Kaliningrad will destabilize European security, ”said State Department spokesman John Kirby.

    And the construction of a US and NATO missile defense system at our borders did not destabilize European security?
  29. +2
    22 November 2016 10: 38
    “We also call on Russia to refrain from actions that are not consistent with ensuring stability and security in the Euro-Atlantic region,” Kirby added.


    The best action to ensure stability and security in the Euro-Atlantic region is the DEFORMATION of the NATO UNIT !!! This is clear to the student, but when will it come to these stupid people? Disband this aggressive bloc, so it will not be necessary to put Iskander near Kaliningrad. And you will find money for migrants so that Airbus can send them all home, but give everyone a money for small business, so that they don’t go to Europe, let them grow bananas and pineapples in their homeland.
  30. vmo
    +1
    22 November 2016 10: 40
    This ugliness, John Kirby sounded like this, they hit the other cheek, or maybe it’s better for the psheks not to be scared, not to install a missile defense system and the solution is simple and money is safe!
  31. +1
    22 November 2016 10: 44
    Our self-defense law is exactly the same as Kirby's. We must not defend ourselves, exceeding the "necessary self-defense", we must not arm (deploy missiles on our territory). Very strange, isn't it?
  32. +2
    22 November 2016 10: 51
    "The State Department urged Russia not to place Iskander and S-400 complexes near Kaliningradas it “destabilizes European security»", ..

    It is for this reason that it is necessary to place ... Moreover - without fail ...
    1. +1
      22 November 2016 11: 31
      Quote: weksha50
      "The State Department urged Russia not to place Iskander and S-400 complexes near Kaliningradas it “destabilizes European security»", ..

      It is for this reason that it is necessary to place ... Moreover - without fail ...

      I completely agree I will add: "... to neutralize the European danger and calm the violent, do not rock the boat, you are at gunpoint."
  33. 0
    22 November 2016 10: 51
    As they themselves pump Europe with their warriors and scrap metal, this is all normal. So you get the answer.
  34. 0
    22 November 2016 10: 56
    What do they smoke there
  35. +1
    22 November 2016 10: 56
    It seems that these "dabloids" have only a small fraction of one hemisphere of the brain working, and then below the back! But they stuffed along the borders with Russia a supposedly missile defense system, which can be used as an attack weapon, and now they are screaming about an adequate response! One word, naglo-Saxons!
  36. 0
    22 November 2016 11: 00
    Quote: DMB_95
    Although, maybe everyone is there?

    It pleases and scares at the same time.
  37. +1
    22 November 2016 11: 02
    This simple Fashington, like a laundry soap. laughing Begin to call and advise yourself, but in general they have become overwhelmed and brutalized with their kooky! D, B bully
  38. +1
    22 November 2016 11: 15
    if Americans say "no need", then it is NECESSARY, then it is VERY NECESSARY!
  39. +1
    22 November 2016 11: 18
    I apologize for my "French"
    the one thousandth muzzle!
  40. +1
    22 November 2016 11: 19
    Without snotty advisers, Russia itself will decide where to place something on its territory.
  41. +2
    22 November 2016 11: 19
    remove the bases, and nuclear weapons from Germany, then we'll talk.
  42. 0
    22 November 2016 11: 25
    vin would still tell us how to cook borst
  43. +2
    22 November 2016 11: 26
    Moscow also called on NATO not to deploy missile defense in Europe, and where did Washington send these calls? The US can send its calls to the trash, for the words of the Russian Federation can be trusted, promised to place, we will place.
  44. +2
    22 November 2016 11: 27
    Remove missile defense and no questions. Better yet, end the occupation of Germany. It's about time.
  45. +1
    22 November 2016 11: 37
    Well, since Kirby said, then you must put it on! :)
  46. cap
    0
    22 November 2016 12: 03
    “We understand that Russia has the right to deploy conventional nuclear forces on its territory. The deployment of Iskander and C-400 in Kaliningrad will destabilize European security, ”said State Department spokesman John Kirby.

    I propose removing nuclear weapons from Europe, launchers for any missiles, and disbanding NATO.
    I ask you to convey my wish to the State Department. hi
    1. 0
      23 November 2016 01: 48
      And with an explanation of how we understand that the United States has the right to deploy conventional nuclear forces on its territory, but does not understand what the United States has the right to deploy conventional nuclear forces in foreign territories. Or let them recognize the occupation of Germany and the existence of the Chancellor.
  47. +2
    22 November 2016 12: 06
    Here's a joke! A NATO tank brigade is stationed 1.5 hours from my house in the Kaliningrad region, behind the nearest fishing line in Lithuania. Danish, German, British, Swedish and other tank units supported by American motorized infantry. They arrived there "in peace" so that the Balts could sleep peacefully at night. They came to drink in Vilnius pubs, urinate in Lithuanian flower beds, beat the muzzles of a few local youth and molest local girls. The tanks, apparently, took with them "for decency", so that there was something to show the local political elite. Therefore, the transfer of Iskander to Kaliningrad is an "act of blatant aggression" against peaceful European tankers !? WHAT IS A DISCOVERED LOGIC)
    1. 0
      22 November 2016 12: 31
      Quote: von_Tilsit
      We arrived to thump in Vilnius pubs, pee on Lithuanian flowerbeds, beat the faces of a few local youth and molest local girls.

      I wish them success in this endeavor.
    2. +1
      22 November 2016 13: 15
      "NATO tank brigade is stationed in Lithuania. Danish, German, English, Swedish" ////

      Actually, an infantry battalion.
      The exercises with tanks were in 2015 and ended - NATO returned to their countries
  48. 0
    22 November 2016 12: 29
    Kirby-Emelya, tell the State Department that we urge you not to call us anymore. And next time, don’t forget to wear a clown hat.
  49. 0
    22 November 2016 12: 41
    Let's place missiles in Mexico (or Cuba), and we will urge America not to put a missile defense. With words, why so sharply react then? We just, just in case, not for the sake of aggression))
  50. 0
    22 November 2016 12: 43
    Quote: olimpiada15
    Moscow also called on NATO not to deploy missile defense in Europe, and where did Washington send these calls? The US can send its calls to the trash, for the words of the Russian Federation can be trusted, promised to place, we will place.


    The only thing we did wrong was that we promised for a long time and did nothing.
  51. 0
    22 November 2016 12: 45
    Post!!!I approve
  52. 0
    22 November 2016 13: 39
    Fuck you! The sly fox in action. You can't follow the lead. There is a statement from Putin like an ultimatum. If the conditions are met, then the equipment can be safely transferred to the mainland, and then shown off.
  53. 0
    22 November 2016 14: 01
    The State Department called on Russia not to deploy Iskander and S-400 systems near Kaliningrad, as this would “destabilize European security,”

    And we call on NATO to shrink to the boundaries in which it was before the death of the USSR, and to fulfill the promises they made to Gorbachev, because we believe that it was their actions to expand NATO that destabilized European security, and indeed destroyed it! angry
  54. 0
    22 November 2016 14: 04
    Dear Kirby, there is no need to turn everything upside down, we were not the first to start this arms race in Europe, first we moved the borders of NATO, then the construction of a missile defense system, now we have turned the Baltic states into a military training ground and bridgehead, and everything is “not necessary”... and in general your interests are only beyond the puddle of the Atlantic Ocean, nothing more, remember this and punish your children, do not anger Russia
  55. 0
    22 November 2016 20: 36
    And here it is necessary to quote Kirby’s words: “For 20 years now, Russia has been promising to deploy Iskander missiles in the Kaliningrad region “in response to various situations in Europe, none of which required such a military response.”
    And that it is the deployment of US missile defense elements on European territory that creates a threat to the latter.
  56. 0
    22 November 2016 21: 22
    “We understand that Russia has the right to deploy conventional nuclear forces on its territory. The deployment of Iskander and C-400 in Kaliningrad will destabilize European security, ”said State Department spokesman John Kirby.
    Kirbets! Stop the hysteria and advise your friends in NATO to at least return to the 1991 borders! Advise Bar Obashka to reduce the number of military bases in Europe. Weak?!
  57. +1
    22 November 2016 22: 52
    you can’t... you can’t..., by God you can’t..... . It’s not beautiful, it’s not environmentally friendly, it increases..., lowers..., the rights of minorities, Jews,.... . TO reduce..., increase..., the rights of Jews...., the opposition..., they are CHILDREN!!!, --- plant "Topol" on them all