2C25 "Sprut-SD": Russian tank destroyer

10
2С25 “Sprut-SD” is a Russian airborne self-propelled anti-tank gun. Developed in the design office of the Volgograd Tractor Plant and the Yekaterinburg OKB-9 under the supervision of the Klimov Central Scientific Research Institute of Precision Engineering.

SAU "Octopus-SD" is designed to combat tanks, armored vehicles and manpower of the enemy as part of the units of the airborne troops, marines and special forces.



10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    26 October 2016 09: 10
    Yes, the site is getting smaller! Why do we need these commercials? We are here performance characteristics, quantity, problems with the release, we discuss the experience of use! VO, what are you going to join YouTube? And the site is blunting specifically, how to deal with it?
    1. +6
      26 October 2016 09: 31
      And the problem is, the site is developing. . . trying to make a new one, the site is not only specialists, but there are ordinary civilians who start with the basics and such videos are very necessary.
      Everyone chooses what he needs and takes the information that he considers valuable.
      Or is it the goal, the main thing is to complain about everything that is possible?
    2. +3
      26 October 2016 09: 43
      Find a site that is more meaningful and not dull. I agree with you, Soon there will be a "shelter" here and jingoistic patriots "pushing" comments like: "Well done, our officers, worthy successors of their heroic ancestors.", "Good news", etc.
  2. +1
    26 October 2016 09: 56
    There are a lot of advertisements. already tired.
    1. +3
      26 October 2016 10: 02
      Quote: IPSC-2008
      There are a lot of advertisements. already tired.


      It seems they have already explained that without advertising any resource is not able to survive. . . probably not to reach many at all.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. +1
        26 October 2016 14: 43
        Quote: DTH
        install the add-on in your browser "A dguard Antiband"and you will be happy.


        Do you think it's smart to write about IT on the site?
        Hmmm
  3. 0
    26 October 2016 10: 54
    The gun is good, but the platform is light, so that it would throw equipment at a shot - I did not see it.
    Works with a gun, apparently only on the front.
    1. +2
      26 October 2016 12: 41
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bscAbyG_ZJw
      Why write nonsense, they say it doesn’t shoot to the sides? Who would take such an armament?
      And at the expense of tossing the car, so admire Stryker, that one is still a barn ...
    2. +1
      26 October 2016 17: 18
      Quote: The Bloodthirster
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bscAbyG_ZJw
      Why write nonsense, they say it doesn’t shoot to the sides? Who would take such an armament?
      And at the expense of tossing the car, so admire Stryker, that one is still a barn ...

      You're right. The mass of the machine is only 18 tons. And the cannon from the 46 ton tank. Of course. due to the refinement of the chassis, the engineers had to extinguish the most powerful return of the tank 125 millimeter gun. Therefore, the buildup during the shot is significant.
  4. +3
    26 October 2016 12: 00
    What nonsense are you talking about? What kind of advertising? These are just beautiful videos about Russian weapons.
  5. +1
    26 October 2016 14: 07
    2C25 "Sprut-SD": Russian tank destroyer
    Helicopters are better suited for this role, by the way, and why haven’t yet come up with landing methods for transferring them to bridgeheads, the range of their flight will not always allow them to do this on their own, although it’s probably time to install REFUELING RODS on them, but in the role airmobile and amphibious LIGHT tanks, that is, the initial means of supporting the infantry, both airborne and sea, "SPRUT" will come down. Although here BUT ... but apparently it's time to develop a wheeled analogue. Give RUSSIA !!!
  6. +1
    26 October 2016 20: 39
    that you whine like girls, do not like it, bring it to another resource
  7. 0
    27 October 2016 09: 20
    Quote: svp67
    Helicopters are better suited for this role, by the way, why haven’t they yet come up with landing methods of transferring them to bridgeheads?

    They came up, only the French did not sell it to us .... am