As the masters of the West unleashed World War II

85
As the masters of the West unleashed World War II


In the West, continue to rewrite history and develop the myth that the Nazi Germany was to blame for the unleashing of the Second World War, but for the USSR. So, a few days ago, the Parliament of Ukraine adopted a joint declaration with Poland and Lithuania in memory of the victims of the Second World War, which says that the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact led to its beginning. That is, in the opinion of Kiev and Warsaw, the two main instigators of the Second World War are the USSR and Germany.



However, this is a typical “revision” of world history for our time. The West continues to rewrite history to fit its needs. In London, Washington and Paris can not recognize the truth that World War II was a continuation of the First World War, and it was unleashed by the masters of the West - Great Britain, the USA and France, in order to destroy foreign global projects and establish their world order, the global non-slave civilization. The West is no longer satisfied with the politically correct myth created after the war that the main instigators of the Second World War are fascist Italy, Nazi Germany and militarist Japan. In reality, Berlin, Rome and Tokyo were only figures in the Big Game, at times trying to play an independent game.

Toward a big war, Italy, Germany and Japan were pushed by more serious players - the United States and Britain, the “financial international” behind them. To the power of the fascists in Italy and the Nazis in Germany led the masters of the West (mainly the USA and England) - so-called. "World backstage", "golden elite", "financial international". The richest families of the West financed the fascists and nazis, fostered Hitler to unleash a big war in Europe and the world. Also, the masters of the West (the Anglo-Saxon project) did step by step: the Japanese-Chinese war, the Russian-Japanese war, Japan’s participation in the First World War, the Japanese intervention in Russia during the Civil War, the intervention in Manchuria, the Japanese-Chinese war 1937-1945 ., pushing the Japanese empire to aggression in the Pacific, consistently bleeding the Japanese with the Chinese and the Russians.

The First World War ended in a decisive victory for the powers that were the real instigators of the war — Britain, France and the United States. More precisely, their owners. The old feudal people's aristocratic powers, which hindered the onset of the era of the capitalist "democratic" world, were destroyed. The masters of the West crushed the Austro-Hungarian, German, Russian and Ottoman empires and lived well on their fragments.

The West celebrated victory and already divided Russia into colonies, spheres of influence and dependent banana republics of bantustans. The masters of the West unleashed a terrible civil war in Russia, while simultaneously supporting the Reds (Trotskyists-internationalists), the Whites, and the national separatists. This war was to break up Great Russia into many fragments that automatically fell within the sphere of influence of the West, as well as partly of Turkey, China and Japan. England introduced its occupation forces with the aim of tearing away the Russian North, part of Turkestan and the Caucasus. In the Black Sea appeared and the French. Turkey occupied part of the Caucasus. Poland was supposed to seize the lands of Little and White Russia. Finnish nationalists planned to create the Great Finland at the expense of the Russian lands (Karelia, the Kola Peninsula, etc.). The United States, with the help of Czechoslovak bayonets, began to occupy the Great Siberian Route, the main communication from the European part of Russia to the Pacific Ocean, which allowed controlling most of Russia - the Far East, Siberia and the North (together with England). Japan claimed the lands on the Amur, on the northern part of Sakhalin, Kamchatka, the adjacent islands, on the Russian lands in China - Zheltorossiya (Manchuria, CER, etc.). Russia was divided between the winners.

Russia actually fell. Russia should not have remained on the world map. Russia and Russian erased from world history. However, our enemies miscalculated. The Trotskyist internationalists, who were the “fifth column” of the West in Russia and who were to transfer power in Central Russia to their masters, were opposed by the real Bolsheviks (the future Stalinists). For the most part they were ordinary people without a “double bottom”, they fervently believed in a “bright future” without exploiting the working class, without parasitic superstructures over the people. The Russian Communists, the Red Komdivs and the commanders simply would not forgive the commissars-Trotskyists of direct treason, would destroy them. And in the party itself, a popular leader appeared who was clean before the people and was not dirty with communications with the special services and "non-governmental" structures of the West. It was Joseph Stalin.

The revival of the Russian civilization (empire) began, but already through the Soviet project, in the image of the Soviet Union. The people supported the project of the Bolsheviks, their program. Therefore, the whites were defeated, as were the nationalists and outright bandits - "green". The Anglo-American, French and Japanese invaders fled because they could not resist the whole people. The virus of revolution has also affected the West. The revolution was sick Germany, a key power in Europe. Began the revival of Russia. There was a liquidation of illiteracy, the accelerated rates created new education system. The country's economy was being restored.

A merciless struggle went on inside the Bolshevik party itself, the struggle between Western agents — Sverdlovsk, Trotskyists, internationalists and real Russian communists, Stalinist Bolsheviks, headed by Joseph Stalin — led first to seize control and dismiss the most odious figures from the Soviet olympus most odd figures, who were most intimidating figures who were headed by the most daring figures who were led by Joseph Stalin. . And then, from 1924 to 1939, to the almost complete defeat of western agents in Russia (represented by all kinds of Kamenev, Zinoviev, Bukharin, etc.). It was a "great purge." It is clear that the technology of that time did not allow to separate the wheat from the chaff. In addition, the terror began under Trotsky, and it was carried out by such "enemies of the people" as Yagoda and Yezhov. Therefore, many innocents suffered as well.

However, they did a great deal - the “fifth column” on the eve of the new big war was largely withdrawn. The remnants of the agents were silenced, "repainted." The fiendish commissars who tripled the bloody terror in Great Russia themselves fell into this meat grinder. No wonder Stalin was so hated and still hated in the West, as well as by the descendants of the “ardent commissioners” and their relatives. Before the beginning of World War II, a powerful hearth of the “fifth column” in the armed forces was eliminated (unfortunately, not completely, which led to a catastrophic beginning of the war and unjustifiably high losses). From that moment on, the USSR became invincible in open war. That proved the Great Patriotic War.

Thus, the Russian Communists were able to destroy the "fifth column" before the beginning of the Second World War and saved the Russian civilization - the Soviet Union, from a new catastrophe. (the tsarist government could not do this, which led to the 1917 disaster of the year). WITH From this moment on, the concepts of communists, party, Red Banner, Red Army, Red Star, socialism became native, Russian for Russian civilization. They became the personification of the Russian national idea.

Great Russia and the Russian superethnos were reborn, cleansed of killers, parasites and thieves, agents of other countries. The purification of Russia-the USSR was accompanied by comprehensive training, the creation of the world's best education and health systems, culture and science, unprecedented in its power by industrialization, collectivization, the formation of a people's army and fleet. All this went at an unprecedented pace ("Russian miracle"). The Russian giant was reborn from the ashes, like a Phoenix bird. Great Russia swiftly and majesticly embodied the age-old dream of all mankind - a better world, the “kingdom of God” on Earth. The Soviet project created a new society - a society of service and creation, a society of genuinely free people, creators, creators, workers and warriors. The western project created a neo-slave society, a society of slave-consumer people, over which a handful of “chosen”, “owners” parasitized.

It is clear that all the sympathies of the best people of humanity were on the side of the Union. And the masters of the West were terrified. Russia presented to the world a different project for the development of mankind - a just, moral one. He destroyed all the foundations of the parasitic, unjust, slave-owning world that was being built by the masters of the West (“New Babylon”). With one jerk, Great Russia became a world leader (superpower), ahead of the West and giving all of humanity hope for a more just world order. The Soviet project ruined all plans of the West for world domination, undermined their conceptual, ideological and technical leadership on the planet.

On the eve of the Second World War, the West, which was well welded to the total robbery of the states that had lost the war and their fragments, and especially Russia, was agonizing again. Parasitic Western civilization can not exist without looting and seizure of new territories. The crisis of the Western world was called the "Great Depression."

Thus, the new big war had three main reasons. First, according to the results of the First World War, they could not finish off Russia and build a New World Order - a global slave-holding civilization.

Secondly, the West collapsed, was in crisis. For the development of the western project, wars, robberies, the seizure of new territories and resources are vital.

Thirdly, an alternative Western project was born in Russia at an unprecedented pace - a society of creation and service, the basis of which was a creative person, a man-creator, and not a slave-consumer, as in the West. The Soviet project sentenced and could bury the entire Western world, based on lies, injustice, usury and parasitism (the world of the "golden calf").

As a result, again the masters of the West — Britain, the United States and France — initiated the big war. Symbiosis of usurious banking capital, oligarchs, Vatican masters, masonic orders and lodges, Protestant churches and Judaism. The West plays the same card as in the First World War. Bleeds the Germans with the Russians, Germany with Russia, drawing almost the whole of Europe into the war. Also, again, trying to incite the Russian Japanese. And again, the main instigators of the great war and the enemies of Russia, Britain and the United States, are left as it were.

The masters of the West in advance create several hotbeds of war in Europe. This is the Finnish elite who dreams of "Great Finland" up to the Urals. This is the Polish "hyena", which dreams of "Greater Poland" from sea to sea, with the inclusion of Lithuania, Belarus and Little Russia. These are the builders of "Great Romania" and "Great Hungary". In Italy, they support the fascists from Mussolini, who plans to restore the "Roman Empire" at the expense of the lands on the Balkan Peninsula and in Africa. Therefore, the owners of the West turn a blind eye to the aggression of Italy in Ethiopia in 1935-1936. Moreover, the West allows Italians to seize Abyssinia-Ethiopia.

However, this "trifle." The main role should play again Germany. Therefore, the usury Anglo-Saxon capital finances Hitler, the Nazis. The masters of the West use all their channels of influence on the German elite - the aristocracy, the generals, bankers and industrialists, so that they support the Nazis, and they legally seized power. When the Nazis come to power by legal means, the West, first of all the USA and England, do everything to bring Germany out of the crisis, to restore its industrial and military potential. Moreover, the masters of the West allow Hitler and his henchmen to use secret psychotechnologies for treating the masses, the population, and its “zombies.” The Germans are turned into a single combat mechanism. The masters of the West open the door to the inferno, allow Christianity to be moved, returning the world to neo-paganism. Germany is making a technical and psychological breakthrough into the future, but along the “dark side” of power.

In this way, Western masters turn Germany into a powerful "ram", which should crush the Soviet civilization. Do not let Great Russia complete its breakthrough into a bright future by burying a parasitic western project.

In the East, Japan was to play the role of instigator of the war. Anglo-Saxons skillfully incited her to China and Russia. The three powers - Russia, Japan and China, whose friendship and cooperation could turn the Asia-Pacific region into a zone of prosperity and security, became enemies, and their confrontation brought (and brings) continuous benefit to the owners of the West.

To be continued ...
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    25 October 2016 06: 08
    Mr. Samsonov, you splendidly expose other people's texts, but analytics is not yours.
    1. +8
      25 October 2016 08: 33
      this is not analytics, this is a collection of phobias and conspiracy theories
      1. +3
        25 October 2016 10: 42
        It seems that the author of the article did not understand that all these people, "Trotskyists" and "Stalinists", whom he opposes to each other, had the same goals, only the view of the very process of achieving them was somewhat different. There is an opinion, and not only mine, that Trotsky just got it in the head with an ice pick because he stopped accusing Stalin of betraying the ideals of the world revolution, to which Stalin was faithful to the very end, only went to them in a different way. Burned raspberries, for short.
        1. +7
          25 October 2016 10: 56
          Quote: rvRomanoff
          It seems that the author of the article did not understand that all these people, "Trotskyists" and "Stalinists", whom he opposes to each other, had the same goals, only the view of the very process of achieving them was somewhat different. There is an opinion, and not only mine, that Trotsky just got it in the head with an ice pick because he stopped accusing Stalin of betraying the ideals of the world revolution, to which Stalin was faithful to the very end, only went to them in a different way. Burned raspberries, for short.

          Sing, sing. Stalin is Hitler, Stalin is Trotsky, Stalin is Lenin. Bullshit. Stalin is our everything, this is what we will report to the 20th century in our history.
        2. +1
          25 October 2016 12: 45
          Wake up ... you are delusional ... (c) It seems that the author of the article did not understand that all these people, "Trotskyists" and "Stalinists", whom he opposes to each other, had the same goals (c) Serious analytics, it is a pity that delirious. If Power is meant by "purpose", then yes, all power structures have one goal. But this kind of thinking is characteristic of "Pokemon" and is in no way connected with reality. In reality, "Power" is just a tool for achieving the Goal. When you start to think (if possible) broader, you will see how the goals of the Trotskyists differed from those of Stalin.
          1. 0
            25 October 2016 17: 17
            Two unsubstantiated hits, a statement from the series "thank you CEP" and a vague hint in the finale. The breadth of thought, so to speak, on the face. Meanwhile, the ultimate goal, which both of them officially regulated - world communism. And everything else is just all sorts of subjective speculations and conscious distortions. And there is no need to label me as a "lover of Trotskyists" or "a Stalinist hater." My subjective opinion on this issue has not been expressed here and does not concern anyone. (All the wrongs).
            1. +2
              26 October 2016 05: 51
              Quote: rvRomanoff
              Two unsubstantiated hits, a statement from the series "thank you CEP" and a vague hint in the finale. The breadth of thought, so to speak, on the face. Meanwhile, the ultimate goal, which both of them officially regulated - world communism. And everything else is just all sorts of subjective speculations and conscious distortions. And there is no need to label me as a "lover of Trotskyists" or "a Stalinist hater." My subjective opinion on this issue has not been expressed here and does not concern anyone. (All the wrongs).

              1. My subjective opinion on this issue has not been expressed here and does not concern anyone Do you understand yourself - what did you write? Expressed someone else's opinion and prove it with sopple. If you consider someone else's right, then it is already yours and you expressed it.
              "There is an opinion, and not only mine, that Trotsky just got it in the head with an ice pick because he stopped accusing Stalin of betraying the ideals of the world revolution," - So it’s clear what label you deserve. A pervert (in the sense of history) is a liberal.
              2. World capitalism - do you like it better? Without expansion, there is no development of an extensive system of capitalism. World communism is a weightless mass for our country. Stalin built and built socialism in a single country. For a long time he did not want China to be communist. All countries of the social camp were social democratic, if you know. Stalin solved other tasks all his life - Survival of the country. By the way - who defeated the Comintern?
        3. +4
          25 October 2016 14: 47
          Quote: rvRomanoff
          It seems that the author of the article did not understand that all these people, "Trotskyists" and "Stalinists", whom he opposes to each other, had the same goals, only the view of the very process of achieving them was somewhat different.

          So you can say that ordinary workers and robbers had the same goals (somehow get the money) only the view on the process of their achievement was somewhat different. smile
          Trotsky is a world revolution with great bloodshed, with bayonets, outstripping the pace, at all costs (including by robbing Russia to support revolutions abroad), without waiting for the creation of a revolutionary situation (which, incidentally, the classics warned of).
          Stalin is, first of all, the arrangement of "the world's first state of workers and peasants", including at the cost of refusing revolutionary rhetoric and cooperation with the capitalists. And waiting for a convenient moment to expand the territory of socialism - only when the fruit has ripened and falls into the hand itself.
          Truth. not always outwardly mature the fetus turned out to be so in practice - see SPS and the Kuusinen government. But in such cases, the IVS did not go to the end, but could always retreat. The same Trotsky would go in Finland to Helsinki and further, having arranged along the way a war with the Allies in the North and the Caucasus.
          1. 0
            25 October 2016 15: 05
            Quote: Alexey RA
            "the world's first state of workers and peasants"

            Precisely, in other states there were no workers and peasants in those days !. Yes
            1. 0
              25 October 2016 18: 12
              Quote: Aleksander
              Precisely, in other states there were no workers and peasants in those days !.

              All questions - to the ideologists "mind, honor and conscience of our era"- this was a quote from the preface to the 35th volume of the PSS VIL: smile
              In the face the world's first state of workers and peasants working mankind has found a reliable stronghold in its struggle against the wars of conquest, for the peace and security of peoples.
            2. +3
              26 October 2016 06: 49
              Aleksander again, the Moldavian expert worries about Russia! belay laughing
      2. +2
        25 October 2016 19: 22
        Quote: Stas57
        this is not analytics, this is a collection of phobias and conspiracy theories


        Well, you don’t have anything at all.
        Are you at least some kind of counterargument able to bring?
        Or for the most empty comment like you are ready to instruct the pluses by showing that the essence and truth of the last resort are allegedly told here?
        Give at least one counterargument, so that it would be clear what your opinion is based on.
    2. +4
      25 October 2016 10: 53
      Quote: Cartalon
      Mr. Samsonov, you splendidly expose other people's texts, but analytics is not yours.

      Normally sets out, in the form of an abstract. Let's continue.
      And the screech of the liberals, so much freedom, to which the Yaks infringe at once, is silent, such a community. Only we again as in 37g, on the eve of the war. And the Augean stables have not yet been cleaned, again in the organs of the berry and the blackberry were dug. It’s time to clean and start with the security forces.
      1. 0
        26 October 2016 21: 14
        Normally expounds. In the form of an introduction to a new large series of articles. I see that the continuation has already come out, I'm late.
  2. +3
    25 October 2016 06: 15
    it was unleashed by the owners of the West - Great Britain, the USA and France, with the aim of destroying other people's global projects and establishing their own world order, a global non-slave civilization

    Parliament of Ukraine adopted a joint declaration with Poland and Lithuania in memory of the victims of World War II

    Passing pawns that did not get into the queens. Thinking, swarming, puffing out their cheeks, as if they were deciding something in world politics.
    1. +3
      25 October 2016 06: 35
      Unfortunately, these ordinary pawns are listened to by ordinary people and believe in them. This is how politics is formed.
  3. +2
    25 October 2016 06: 36
    It was very interesting * competition * for the main conqueror between Germany and Poland. Some have * ordnung * and the talkative Fuhrer, others * have the glory * of the winners of the Council of Deputies and unlimited ambition. Today, Poles habitually stand in a position of resentment, but bad helpfulness in the interests of others attracts seemingly prospects, and here comes something that cannot be explained without psychiatry.
  4. +6
    25 October 2016 07: 48
    A merciless struggle took place within the Bolshevik Party itself, a struggle between the agents of the West - Sverdlovsk, Trotskyists, internationalists and real Russian Communists, Bolshevik-Stalinists, led by Joseph Stalin
    .... and who is Lenin? .. according to this classification? smile
    1. +4
      25 October 2016 07: 55
      Well, I’m clear.
    2. +5
      25 October 2016 08: 03
      Quote: parusnik
      ... and who is Lenin? .. according to this classification? smile

      How is it in the film "Chapaev": "I am for the International!", ... "And what Lenin, what International, Lenin?"
      I did not understand, the Bolsheviks-Communists or the Communists-Bolsheviks. In the second part, I probably understand.
      1. +5
        25 October 2016 08: 14
        With the same logic as the author's, neither I can understand this, nor you! But here everyone has their own shiz. Someone is crazy about Fomenko, someone is on the great Russian idea from Hyperborea. But you think correctly, let's not rush, we'll see. It is not necessary to think in advance about people worse than they are. Maybe the second part will really be different from the first. I just have a question: what kind of people do they belong to, the pederast people's commissars Yagoda and Yezhov, who were shot by Stalin's court? To the Trotskyists, Bolsheviks, Stalinists ... And why couldn't they have been exposed for so long? Surely everything was revealed only when they climbed to the very top, and before that "they cleverly disguised themselves as decent!"
        1. +7
          25 October 2016 09: 10
          Quote: kalibr
          I just have a question: and the people's commissarsbuggers Yagoda and Yezhov, shot by the Stalinist court, what are they related to?

          I didn't hold a candle. If so, then they were carrying "European values" even then. For that and "suffered". How do you like this version? wink
          1. +4
            25 October 2016 10: 14
            Yagoda and Yezhov are English spies, this is the main party version, and even spies that knew how to disguise themselves as Leninists.
            The article is good, which attacked.
          2. +3
            25 October 2016 17: 14
            That is, their inclinations were exposed, and at the same time spy addictions only when they made their way to the top? And why only here in the USSR and Western spies and buggers, and drunkards always made their way to the very top? Why did not one of our Soviet spies, pederasts and drunkards made their way to the very top in the USA, in England ... and didn’t ruin everything in FIG? Only we are so happy!
            1. 0
              25 October 2016 19: 03
              Kim Philby - one of the leaders of British intelligence, have forgotten? part-time agent of Soviet intelligence. The English, too, were happy.
              1. +1
                26 October 2016 07: 54
                One of them is still not the People’s Commissar of the NKVD. And he did not destroy so many people. And here are the designers, and military experts, and peasants from the plow. And most importantly - a lion in a row, one shift of another. Your Kim Philby is just a schoolboy compared to British spies Yagoda and Yezhov!
                1. 0
                  26 October 2016 09: 10
                  Why - two in a row, but where to put these? Beria, Abakumov are also spies, and I didn’t stigmatize them like that.
              2. 0
                19 June 2017 19: 31
                Pederast i pyanica tozhe bil.
                Vsyo skladivaetsa. :)
            2. +3
              25 October 2016 19: 18
              Quote: kalibr
              Why did not one of our Soviet spies, pederasts and drunkards made their way to the very top in the USA, in England ... and didn’t ruin everything in FIG?

              Probably because sodomy is not in our honor. Even for the homeland !. And, in the USSR there was also an article.
              And what is a Soviet scout without vodka?
              "- Stirlitz, do you have a plan?
              - You are wrong, Mueller. I have vodka. I am a Russian intelligence officer, not an Afghan one! "

              Not all is lost yet. Trump, an agent of the Kremlin, is almost there.
              At least Blunt, Philby, Abel, .... Anything about them?
              Quote: kalibr
              Only we are so happy!

              Yes, it remains to be seen, most likely for the descendants, who is Gorbachev and who from his inner circle worked for the USA and England. And from the Yeltsin "family".
              1. +1
                25 October 2016 22: 30
                Here I am about the same ... It is one thing to communize the blueprints of the atomic bomb, and it is quite another to become Minister of State Security, and even two in a row. Something bad we have spies after all. Is Trump exactly an agent of the Kremlin? Then you held a candle, right?
                1. +1
                  26 October 2016 08: 06
                  Quote: kalibr
                  Is Trump exactly an agent of the Kremlin? Then you held a candle, right?

                  Well, Duc, Clinton said. How not to believe? Psaki firmly entered our folk art as an example of honesty and intelligence. I think that Trump and Clinton will find a worthy place in our jokes.
                  Quote: kalibr
                  It is one thing to communize the blueprints of the atomic bomb ....

                  Indeed, it’s like two fingers .... Moreover, having a blueprint with drawings you can make a file even in MTS.
        2. +1
          25 October 2016 12: 51
          Quote: kalibr
          I have only a question: and the pederasted people's commissars, Yagoda and Yezhov, who were shot by the Stalinist court, what are they related to?


          Yes, there is a "squiggle" here: the iron people's commissar of Stalin Yezhov who destroyed the "enemy of the people" Yagoda with his gang, he turned out to be himself .... "enemy of the people"! belay So Berry is no longer an enemy? Or is it one enemy of the people destroyed another enemy of the people ?! belay
          What a cunning plan, however!
          True, the next destroyer (already Yezhov) also turned out to be ..... an enemy of the people belay and was, in turn, destroyed. request
          What, however, this cunning West turned out to be: it has bred so many enemies of the people! angry
          Or is it not the West, but our, internal Trotskyite enemies, Leninists, Bukharinists and other things?
          Well, you can’t figure it out in these grades ....recourse request
          1. +2
            25 October 2016 14: 52
            Quote: Aleksander
            Yes, there is a "squiggle" here: the iron people's commissar of Stalin Yezhov, who destroyed the "enemy of the people" Yagoda with his gang, himself turned out to be .... "the enemy of the people"! belay So Yagoda is no longer an enemy? Or was it one enemy of the people who destroyed another enemy of the people ?!

            Worse: one faithful son of the party destroyed the enemy of the people, but, having taken his place and unable to resist the temptation of power, he himself became the enemy of the people. And was destroyed by another faithful son of the party, who in turn ... smile
            In short, everything is according to Dolsky:
            When the nobles and merchants were shot
            And everyone who worked with brains
            A lot of other fellows came,
            Wanted not to be fools.

            When they shot and those fellows,
            What became the fathers of the people
            A lot of other scoundrels came
            Wanted to serve as scoundrels.

            When the scoundrels were also shot,
            That they became enemies of the people
            A lot of other daredevils came
            Wanted not to be dundukami.

            When they shot those daredevils,
            Who became thieves
            Everywhere the choirs of sages sang:
            Only Stalin is to blame!
            1. +2
              25 October 2016 15: 34
              Quote: Alexey RA
              Worse: one faithful son of the party destroyed the enemy of the people, but, having taken his place and unable to resist the temptation of power, he himself became the enemy of the people. And was destroyed by another faithful son of the party, who in turn


              One clarification: the very "first" enemy of the people, destroyed the faithful son of the Yezhov party -was not the first... "Enemy of the people" Yagoda (in fact, Enoch Gershevich Yehuda) also ... destroyed the enemies of the people - Yenukidze, Zinoviev, etc. Yes

              But even before them there were enemies of the people (see the decrees of the Soviet "authorities" 1917, 1918 and the struggle against all sorts of deviators in the 20s))

              So the process of extermination of the enemies of the people by the following enemies of the people, in turn, turned out to be the enemies of the people and destroyed by the following enemies of the people (also shot as enemies of the people), was long-term and continuous for decades. Yes
              1. +1
                25 October 2016 19: 13
                Quote: Aleksander
                So the process of extermination of the enemies of the people by the following enemies of the people, in turn, turned out to be the enemies of the people and destroyed by the following enemies of the people (also shot as enemies of the people), was long-term and continuous for decades.

                Well I say - everything is according to Dolsky. smile

                And you should not limit yourself only to the Soviet period: in the same 18th century, new favorites consistently exiled their predecessors to hell (or even sent to the chopping block).
                1. 0
                  25 October 2016 21: 28
                  Quote: Alexey RA
                  in the same 18 century, new favorites consistently referred their predecessors to hell


                  Hundreds of thousands of shot former favorites and millions of exiled favorites in the 18 century? belay This is something new. what

                  In addition, HOW can we compare the country of the 18 century and - (according to Samsonov) "a better world, the" kingdom of God "on Earth, a new society - a society of service and creation"?! belay request
                  1. +3
                    25 October 2016 21: 31
                    All your writings are akin to the harmonious howl that is now rushing from Ukraine, Poland and the Baltic states about the Great Patriotic War and the USSR.
                    The anti-adviser is always Russophobe, with whom you are absolutely certain.
                  2. +1
                    26 October 2016 10: 17
                    Quote: Aleksander
                    Hundreds of thousands of shot former favorites and millions of exiled favorites in the 18 century? belay This is something new. what

                    Hundreds of thousands of Zinovievs and Berries? This is something new. We seem to have been talking about the processes at the top of the government?
                    1. 0
                      26 October 2016 11: 32
                      Quote: Alexey RA
                      Hundreds of thousands of Zinovievs and Berries? This is something new. We seem to have been talking about processes at the top of power?


                      Of course, hundreds of thousands. Were there not at the bottom of the enemies of the people who were destroyed in the same way as the top?

                      Collective farmers and collective farmers, who acted as witnesses at the trial, unfolded a terrible picture of crimes and lawlessness committed by enemies of the people before the Soviet court. Talking about the monstrous crimes of the rabid gang of fascist bandits, collective farmers witnesses expressed the demand of the working people of the whole Kuraginsky district and territory to destroy the scoundrels who encroached on a happy collective farm life. During the trial, the court received hundreds of resolutions of meetings and rallies of collective farmers and all workers of the Kuraginsky district demanding the most severe punishment to the enemies of the people.
                      "The working people of the region approve the verdict of the court." Krasnoyarsk worker, 24.09.37, No. 220

                      They had the same blood and the same life as the Apfelbaums, and they were clearly much better than the top ...
        3. 0
          25 October 2016 22: 18
          Quote: kalibr
          With a logic like that of the author, I don’t understand this nor you

          In that case, you should read this one. Goebbels, diary entries

          June 30, 1941. We are now working with three secret transmitters to Russia. Trends: the first transmitter is Trotskyist, the second is separatist and the third is nationalist, Russian. All are sharply directed against the Stalinist regime. We use all methods and resort to tricks that proved to be true during the campaign to the west ... About 50 million leaflets were printed for the Red Army. Sent and ordered to drop from aircraft. Moscow seizes radio equipment ... In Moscow we are reproached for wanting to restore tsarism. We’ll quickly chop off our heads with this lie ... There is a growing crisis in the USA. Roosevelt sits between two chairs. The isolationist camp is gaining ground. In London, the enemy’s front gives deep cracks. Yet anti-Bolshevism is deeply settled. The sowing of our former propaganda emerges ...
          His crops, in your mind, gave abundant shoots.
          http://www.litmir.co/br/?b=227355&p=69
          1. +1
            25 October 2016 22: 35
            You seem to have forgotten which party recently won the elections, which flag flies over the Kremlin, which coat of arms is on the coins and the form of ownership recorded in the Constitution. People like you have "loser" written on their foreheads in large letters.
            1. +1
              26 October 2016 00: 45
              It seems you forgot what gods you once prayed for, and then betrayed and sold everything.
              Therefore, the link provided to YOU ​​is very suitable for YOU.
              At the expense of your attempt to insult me, an empty lesson, to squeal to react, there is no desire.
              1. +1
                26 October 2016 07: 38
                I am always on the side of the victors because the people are behind them. "What is the strength of the Pretender? No, not with weapons, not with Polish help, but with the opinion, yes, the opinion of the people!" - A.S. Pushkin. "Boris Godunov" (They pass at school!)
                1. 0
                  26 October 2016 10: 32
                  Do not make excuses like that.
                  And do not cover up your, to put it mildly, "the line of hesitation together with the party," with a truly popular attitude to the shame that you and others like you committed in 90 years.
  5. +3
    25 October 2016 08: 08
    While it is written correctly. What's next?
  6. +2
    25 October 2016 09: 00
    The most interesting thing is that the development of history has been corrected. I read about preparations for the destruction of the Baku oil fields in May 1940 by the British and French. The date of the strikes was scheduled for May 13, 1940. And in the difference of three days, Germany strikes France and England on May 10, 1940.
    Some did not want the coalition of Germany and the USSR.
  7. +1
    25 October 2016 10: 42
    Author - Well done, correctly folded the mosaic of facts! Now consider the picture from a different angle. We will rise above the planet and consider it from afar. There are three countries on the planet created by white criminals, convicts and exiles - immigrants. This is Baskervilia, Merikania and Kangaroo. They are educated by people of the white race, but fiercely hating the two most hardworking, talented and kind people - Slavs and Aryans. And this is what is characteristic (such a scar) over the past millennium, the main wars were wars in which millions of people of the white race died. Basically, the Russians fought against the Germans, in different versions of support by the allies. What is it for?
    1. +1
      25 October 2016 11: 06
      Quote: cunning
      Author - Well done, correctly folded the mosaic of facts! Now consider the picture from a different angle. We will rise above the planet and consider it from afar. There are three countries on the planet created by white criminals, convicts and exiles - immigrants. This is Baskervilia, Merikania and Kangaroo. They are educated by people of the white race, but fiercely hating the two most hardworking, talented and kind people - Slavs and Aryans. And this is what is characteristic (such a scar) over the past millennium, the main wars were wars in which millions of people of the white race died. Basically, the Russians fought against the Germans, in different versions of support by the allies. What is it for?

      Learn history. All "the last millennium were the main wars in which millions were killed" .... right! Chinese. In one WWII, 27 million, and opium, and civil, and internecine. And what about the wars of the Muslim East for the faith? It's scary to stutter about India. It's just that our world history is Anglocentric.
      1. 0
        25 October 2016 11: 16
        Those who do not understand have to use the intellect (learn history) Those who understand enough MIND. In our village they used to say in such cases, faced with arrogant arrogance: "Don't teach a scientist, eat a baked bread!"
        1. +1
          25 October 2016 11: 31
          Here, one with REASON, without knowledge of history, declared that the Russian Empire unleashed the Second World War!
          1. +2
            25 October 2016 11: 38
            You sir, as a true bureaucrat, of course, you know HOW history textbooks, dissertations, reports and analyzes are written. Everything that refutes the "general line of the party" is refuted without proof and fiercely defamed, well, at best, it is not taken into account
            1. +2
              25 October 2016 17: 10
              And how are they written in your village?
              1. +1
                26 October 2016 06: 11
                Quote: kalibr
                And how are they written in your village?

                Do not think in an urban way. In the village, they are sucked out of a finger while lying on a stove. Then you tap on the clave. And here is the story ..... or hit the story.
                1. 0
                  26 October 2016 09: 47
                  It's easy to reformat you urban! They will show, for example, the film "The Fifth Element" and that's it! Are you ready to imitate what you saw in the box - "Stand by the wall, put your hands on the yellow circles, thanks for your cooperation." The city is a large concentration camp for labor. A camp in which a human being ceases to be a person. He is either a pedestrian, or an electorate, or a visitor, or a patient. Nobody calls him "Vasilich!" or "Petrovna", he is either "muschschina" or "woman". Everyone, living in a concrete hole, pays a lot of money for it and is still obliged to repair it, although it belongs to him purely nominally and the authorities can take this hole at any time. People (oddly enough in cities not all have turned into controlled biorobots) in cities for months are deprived of the opportunity to communicate with the natural world, they lose contact with the earth and the stars, they breathe poisoned air and the only available opportunity to restore this connection is a trip to the park or a walk along the promenade. Lomonosov, Pushkin, Tolstoy, Bunin, Alexander Nevsky were born and spent their childhood not in cities with a million inhabitants, but in the countryside. Where are the Tolstoy and Lomonosovs in your cities? Greetings from the village of Slobodka!
                  1. 0
                    27 October 2016 04: 58
                    cannabis yesterday, 09:47
                    Lomonosov, Pushkin, Tolstoy, Bunin, Alexander Nevsky were born and spent their childhood not in cities with a population of over one million, but in a village. Where in your cities are the Tolstoys and the Lomonosovs?
                    In principle, I agree. But in the villages, when was the last time, not Tolstoy, even though Shukshin appeared? And I doubt very much that we have 20 million Lomonosovs. Naughty.
          2. 0
            25 October 2016 11: 44
            Now about 2 World. Who benefits from shifting responsibility for it to Russia and Germany? That's right for those who armed them with ideas, tanks and planes, and those who profited from military supplies, burping full, began to establish a pestilential order in their own way.
            1. 0
              25 October 2016 12: 29
              No comments
        2. +1
          25 October 2016 16: 59
          Well, once in the village, then where is this to be taught. One in the village of mustache academics right from under the cow!
          1. 0
            26 October 2016 06: 14
            Quote: kalibr
            Well, once in the village, then where is this to be taught. One in the village of mustache academics right from under the cow!

            "Learn, what? We have every academician since childhood in Gascon!"
        3. +1
          26 October 2016 06: 08
          Quote: cunning
          Those who do not understand have to use the intellect (learn history) Those who understand enough MIND. In our village they used to say in such cases, faced with arrogant arrogance: "Don't teach a scientist, eat a baked bread!"

          Now it’s clear where in your village there are so many smart people. An ancient recipe. But I would advise (I won’t teach) to read history and not rave about universal values.
          1. 0
            26 October 2016 07: 48
            Here I completely agree with you!
          2. 0
            26 October 2016 09: 29
            I advise me not to advise ....
            1. 0
              27 October 2016 05: 00
              Quote: cunning
              I advise me not to advise ....

              Do not want to advise, do not advise yourself.
  8. +1
    25 October 2016 11: 26
    thanks to the author, quite interestingly stated!
  9. +4
    25 October 2016 12: 07
    The article is complete nonsense! A set of anti-Western cliches, but the theme that was not addressed in the title is outstripped by those people who write me down as a fan of the West, I respect Stalin (although I agree that I like all his actions) and my opinion: yes, yes political leaders of England and France are guilty of unleashing WWII, who, because of fear of the Second World War, didn’t break Nazism’s neck in time.
  10. +1
    25 October 2016 12: 15
    these bastards and now they crave blood
  11. +4
    25 October 2016 12: 37
    Of course, Samsonov's article is largely eclectic, and some of its provisions are controversial, but nevertheless, the train of thought of the author or authors is correct. The main thing that must be firmly assimilated is the West, not the USSR, as they are trying to imagine today, which unleashed the Second World War. The West should be understood as the United States, Great Britain and Zionism as an ideological trend. Educated people know that in the 30s the so-called. "Anti-Comintern Pact" which includes 3 countries: Germany, Japan and Italy. It was these countries that became the instigators of that war. (In parentheses I will add that here, with good reason, one can include Poland, which, like a hyena, ate up the remnants of Germany, as well as Hungary, which took part in the section of the occupation of Czechoslovakia).
    By the way, historians still do not have a unified understanding of when the Second World War began. For example, many American historians consider the beginning of World War II the attack of Japan on the American Pacific Fleet in Pearl Harbor - December 7, 1941.
    At the same time, China has enough supporters of the idea to consider the beginning of the Second World War 7 July 1937 - the day of the "incident on the Logouqiao Bridge" - the beginning of Japan’s open aggression against China.
    But the writer and historian, colonel-border guard A.P. Parshev proposes the date of July 18 1936 - the day of the rebellion of General Franco in Spain.
    There is still an opinion that the beginning of the World War should be considered September 3, 1939 - the day when France and Great Britain declared war on Germany.
    From that moment on, the war acquired a "world" character.
    And here is the first of September 1939. only a local conflict began between Germany and Poland. Although with the "world character" not everything is clear. At that time, there were still two superpowers (the USA and the USSR) that did not participate in the war, therefore, since we were talking about a "world character", then, probably, the date the US entered the war (December 7, 1941) is more suitable.
    Then it is not clear where did this date come from September 1, 1939? It was presented to us by none other than Sir Winston Churchill. Why? Yes, simply because a different, more adequate date would be contrary to the rule of law and historical justice, as British politicians understand it ("The interests of the British Empire - the essence is the highest form of law and justice"). Let's recall the generally known facts. The redrawing of the map of Europe in order to build the millennial Reich did not begin on September 1, 1939, but on March 12, 1938, with the Anschluss of Austria. The ultimatum was issued to the Austrian government and, under the threat of an immediate military invasion, it agreed to Austria joining Germany.
    And where did all progressive humanity look? Where did enlightened Europe and the League of Nations look? It turns out that back in November 1937, the English minister, Lord Halifax, during negotiations with Hitler, on behalf of his government agreed to the "acquisition" of Austria by Germany. A little later, on February 22, 1938, British Prime Minister Chamberlain declared in Parliament that Austria cannot count on the defense of the League of Nations: “We should not deceive, and even more so, should not reassure small weak states, promising them protection from the League of Nations and the corresponding steps on our part. ” The green light of German aggression was given - the process has begun.
    So tell me after that that it was not the West that started the war.
    To summarize, we can draw the following conclusions:
    1. The first victim of the attack was Czechoslovakia;
    3. The first aggressors in this war were Germany, Poland and Hungary;
    4. The aggressors acted with the support of England, France and Italy.
    1. +2
      25 October 2016 13: 26
      "Anti-Comintern Pact" which includes 3 countries: Germany, Japan and Italy. It was these countries that became the instigators of that war.


      Typically, all three countries were in no hurry to fight the Comintern.
      Italy resolved its issues in Africa.
      Hitler occupied almost the whole of Europe until he attacked the USSR.
      The Japanese rushed south and mated with the United States.
      The "fighters against communism" are good.
      Ideology - ideology, and "selfish interests" - "selfish interests".
    2. +1
      25 October 2016 17: 08
      Then why isn’t Austria the first on the list?
      1. 0
        26 October 2016 06: 18
        Quote: kalibr
        Then why isn’t Austria the first on the list?

        And who said she was a victim? People for. And everyone found their place in the Reich and in the Wehrmacht.
    3. +1
      25 October 2016 19: 32
      Quote: demotivator
      By the way, historians still do not have a unified understanding of when the Second World War began.

      Quote: demotivator
      But the writer and historian, colonel-border guard A.P. Parshev proposes the date of July 18 1936 - the day of the rebellion of General Franco in Spain.

      This version is not suitable, since in 1936 the Spanish Civil War broke out, which did not go beyond the borders of the country. Yes, there were fights between Germans and Italians on the one hand, and Soviet Cominterns on the other, but there was no large-scale military confrontation.
      Quote: demotivator
      At the same time, China has enough supporters of the idea to consider the beginning of the Second World War 7 July 1937 - the day of the "incident on the Logouqiao Bridge" - the beginning of Japan’s open aggression against China.

      Acts of Japanese aggression against China were enough even before the 1937 year, and, besides, this was a war between the two countries, and other powers did not intervene in it.
      Quote: demotivator
      12 March 1938 - Anschluss of Austria. The ultimatum was issued to the Austrian government and, under the threat of an immediate military invasion, it agreed to Austria joining Germany.

      The problem is that the ultimatum at that moment was presented by the Germans to the Austrian government unexpectedly, and the Austrians immediately accepted it. And the Anschluss of Austria was not a military confrontation, since the Austrians did not resist.
      The Second World War began on 1 on September 1939, when the Germans attacked Poland. And on September 3 Great Britain and France entered the war. Other dates are not suitable.
      1. +1
        26 October 2016 05: 27
        Other dates are not suitable.


        If we look scrupulously to this matter, then the true date is August 31.
        At 20.00 in Gleivitz, the Germans staged a provocation on their radio station and blamed the Poles for this.

        The next day, Hitler turned to the German people, saying that Poland had attacked German territory and that from that moment Germany was at war with Poland. Newspapers came out with flashy headlines.
        Speaking in the Reichstag, Hitler announced 14 clashes on the border, including three major ones.
        That is, "officially" Poland "attacked" Germany on August 31.
  12. +4
    25 October 2016 15: 18
    Guys, let's not even attribute the United States to that topic to which they have nothing to do. To the beginning of WWII, the USA has no sideways that they earned, but it's silly to argue, but the fact that they unleashed it is completely nonsense. Roosevelt always He was for constructive dialogue with the USSR, and on equal terms. After all, the three powers established a new world order in Yalta. It was after the WWII that two superpowers of the USSR and the USA were born, and England left the political arena. And before the war, the USA had a smaller army than the Poles .
  13. +2
    25 October 2016 19: 41
    The article is delusional. It feels like RenTV or something like that.
    Quote: from article
    The powers of Russia, Japan and China, whose friendship and cooperation could turn the Asia-Pacific region into a zone of prosperity and security, became enemies, and their confrontation brought (and is) solid benefit to the masters of the West.

    I wonder how the author envisions the "cooperation" between China and Japan? Indeed, geopolitical factors make it clear that there can be no peace between these countries.
    Quote: from article
    The Soviet project created a new society - a society of service and creation, a society of truly free people, creator-creators, toilers and warriors.

    I wonder why this "ideal" project fell apart from the inside?
    1. +4
      25 October 2016 21: 18
      Quote: Lord Blacwood
      I wonder why this "ideal" project fell apart from the inside?

      Because there are you who believe in all LIES, believe in all Amnuel, NTSovsky talker, Osokin and Sokolov, Mlechin and Svanidze, in general, all liars.
      1. +1
        25 October 2016 22: 38
        So then they were silent when it fell apart.
        1. +2
          26 October 2016 00: 48
          Quote: kalibr
          So then they were silent when it fell apart.

          But YOU have not fulfilled your duties, having crossed over at once to the other side, aren't you?
          And these were not silent, why again lie? A habit?
          Maybe A. Osokin, the same tantrum on historical topics, did not lie?
          1. +2
            26 October 2016 07: 44
            There is a certain midshipman - a great boss, director and laureate. And then he could not do ANYTHING. What do you want from a senior teacher at a provincial university? Naked ... on a hedgehog? What for? From our department (and departments of other universities) no one climbed, including retired colonels. And I need more than anyone, right? No, really, my friend, it’s worth playing for yourself. And I as a people. And he said his word. In 91, he did not climb to fight for the party, but in 16 he supported EP and Putin. And I for him!
            1. The comment was deleted.
  14. +1
    25 October 2016 20: 17
    I would like to ask a "professional" about how Poland participated in the plunder of the Czech Republic together with the Nazis? Maybe the Polish invasion is no longer a historical fact? Damn, the Czechs and Romanians killed millions of our grandfathers and fathers, but these still determine our fate. Shit in the Arctic .... Who will get control? or "Majors"? Maybe it is worth changing or planting goats (for example, China, to execute nits by publicly shooting, which may have a "house for ducks" Start, shit, setgo
    .
  15. +3
    25 October 2016 21: 13
    The author entered the wrong place a little. It resembles a Jewish joke. Abram comes home from work and tells Sarah - Sarah, I joined the party! Sarah - Abram is always in trouble with you, yesterday you joined shit, today - into the party. The author wants both ours and yours, in general - he has entered. The sheep are intact, and the wolves are not at work, the author gave them cabbage. Interestingly, after all, when the author writes and adds rubbish - he blushes, or is already used to it. What Stalin could be an internationalist when he dispersed the international, and sent those who represented the USSR differently to catch butterflies on a farm. What succeeded was to motivate the Nazi imperialists. But after the war, he realized that you can’t live like that anymore, but didn’t manage to do otherwise.
    1. 0
      25 October 2016 21: 16
      Quote: zenion
      What Stalin could be an internationalist when he dispersed the international, and sent those who represented the USSR differently to catch butterflies on a farm. What succeeded was to motivate the Nazi imperialists. But after the war, he realized that you can’t live like that anymore, but didn’t manage to do otherwise.

      This opinion is absolutely not knowing the story.
      Can you confirm your invention at least with something?
  16. +2
    26 October 2016 07: 39
    Quote: cunning
    They are educated by people of the white race, but fiercely hating the two most hardworking, talented and kind people - Slavs and Aryans

    But are the Slavs not Aryans? He wrote that this is the same thing?
  17. +1
    29 October 2016 19: 32
    financial international. " The masters of the West (mainly the USA and England) brought to power the fascists in Italy and the Nazis in Germany - the so-called. “World backstage”, “golden elite”, “financial international”. The richest families of the West financed the Nazis and Nazis, fostered Hitler so that he would unleash a great war in Europe and the world.
    And what is most paradoxical and cynical at the same time is that these richest families wore, and still bear surnames - Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Morgan, Melona, ​​Dupont, and so on, so forth .... It is strange that the author of the article was "ashamed" to voice them.