EW complex "Lever-AV"

The Lever-AV complex is capable of detecting the radiation of the enemy’s electronic equipment and analyzing them. Using the existing library with signatures of a large number of electronic systems, the complex can determine the type of target and independently choose the most effective type of interference in this situation. Thus, the new EW complex can adapt to the situation and use the interference that is most appropriate in this case.

Comments

[APASUS]

Recently, a lot has been written about the Russian electronic warfare systems, but I’d like to know specifically their saturation in the troops. I’m saying something that this is all advertising. I understand that there is this Lever in Syria and I’m not alone, but in a general sense I don’t think ready for war with the use of electronic warfare.

[freejack]

I will try to disagree with you ... Even in the 2008 war with Georgia, Russian troops used electronic warfare very effectively. I think now both quantitatively and qualitatively in the troops it has become better. And to the question: why the Georgians shot down "relatively many" Russian planes - the answer is simple ... They shot down with Russian air defense systems !!! They are not afraid of electronic warfare!)))

[Same lech]

Yes they say part of the losses is friendly.

In addition, dill brought us dirty tricks.

[APASUS]

Quote: freejack

.Even in the 2008 war with Georgia, Russian troops very efficiently used electronic warfare. I think now both quantitatively and qualitatively in the troops have become better.

The war with Georgia is a kind of Vietnam for us. We won the war against the enemy in advance knowing that he was weak, but really suffered a lot of losses. It was this war that became the starting point for modernization for Russia, there was nowhere to go any further.

Quote: freejack

They shot down Russian air defense systems !!! They are not afraid of EW!)))

Don't say that to anyone, they will laugh

[freejack]

I put smiles for a reason. Joke!) All devices without exception are "afraid" of electronic warfare, where there is at least one semiconductor (I am an electronics engineer) ... And any shielding, grounding, etc. tricks only reduce the problem, but do not exclude it! ... That's just. .. We will have a super-powerful multifrequency electronic warfare, they too ... What will the war turn into? All turned on. We burned all the electronics to each other (on ships, planes, etc.) and went home?! ... :)

[dmi.pris1]

I partially agree with you. Unfortunately, we will begin to carry out hostilities at random .. It doesn’t. And in Ossetia and Syria, so to speak, the losses are optional, it was possible without them, using electronic warfare equipment from the very beginning. or our EW funds are insolvent or, on the General Staff, to put it mildly, stupid people ..

[dmi.pris1]

Oleg, what kind of electronics are you after this comment .. "They are not afraid of electronic warfare" It would be wiser to write that our electronic warfare systems operate at different frequencies than domestic air defense systems ..

[Aleksey_K]

Quote: APASUS

. I understand that in Syria there is this Lever and I think not one, but in a general sense I think we are not ready for war with the use of electronic warfare.

Electronic warfare systems have existed for several decades and are actively used by all developed countries. You "woke up" after sleeping half a century. But can you write about the "Lever", so what is difficult in its application? Turn it on and you look at the reaction of everything that flies and moves in this area. What is the difficulty?

[APASUS]

Quote: Алексей_К

Electronic warfare systems have existed for several decades and are actively used by all developed countries. You "woke up" after sleeping half a century.

Yes, yes, I remember in order to create interference jammed a whole range of waves and these systems were so energy-intensive that they consumed as a good neighborhood.
It was recently that in electronic warfare systems appeared functions of analysis, determination and interference in narrow frequency ranges. Also, it became possible to influence fuses, etc.
I didn’t miss anything, it’s just that modern systems are an order of magnitude more accurate than the samovars with which we jammed the Voice of America, for example, but their number is not enough due to a number of trivial problems, the backwardness of the element base, the price of the final product, the lag in terms of technology, and time we have missed out on full equipment.

[svp67]

Using the existing library with signatures of a large number of electronic systems, the complex can determine the type of target and independently choose the type of interference most effective in a given situation.

That is, having this "library" you can figure out how to fool the "brains" of this system. And yet, how is this "library" replenished? after all, many samples of foreign technology try not to appear in those places where we can record their signals. This means that they will remain "terra incognita" for this complex.
It seems that much of the story is simplified and not entirely true ...

[flyer]

My personal opinion is that electronic warfare equipment is one of the few types of weapons that should by no means be exported. Not in a truncated or otherwise. It's just that you shouldn't dwell on them at all. (Does not mean that we should forget and not improve))) Because this is an extreme "redoubt" in the country's defense. Moreover, with modern methods of warfare. IMHO