Yemeni Hussites refute involvement in the shelling of US Navy ships

31
Information Agency Rider, referring to a representative of the US administration, states that the destroyer of the US Navy has been shot at once again off the coast of Yemen. And in the message it is claimed that the destroyer "Mason" was fired upon again. Also, according to reports from the American side, the escort ship “Ponse” was also attacked.

The material Reuters provides information that from the coast of Yemen, in the area of ​​the Bab el-Mandeb Strait controlled by Hussite rebels, several missiles were fired. A number of US media outlets stated that the missiles fired at the US Navy were allegedly anti-ship. At the same time, the "anti-ship missiles" launched against the destroyer and the ship of the US Navy accompanying him did not hit the target again ...



Pentagon claims rocket attack on destroyer Mason caused the need for retaliatory strike, and the destroyer made several volleys toward the coast, from which allegedly shelling and carried out.

Yemeni Hussites refute involvement in the shelling of US Navy ships


Representatives of the Hussites in the media categorically denied their involvement in the shelling of US warships and the presence of anti-ship missiles.

And this is what the Pentagon representative’s message looks like:
All those who threaten our servicemen must remember that the command reserves the right to protect the ships of the US Navy. We are ready to respond to all threats in the near future should be the way.


Does this mean that Washington prepared the ground for an invasion into Yemen, because the Saudi coalition is doing there, to put it mildly, not in the best way for it, moreover, more and more information comes about Riyadh’s war crimes against the Yemeni civilians .
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    13 October 2016 06: 20
    All right. They fired themselves. As in the DNI, LC, Syria, etc.
    1. +4
      13 October 2016 06: 24
      Quote: olhon
      They fired themselves. As in the DNI, LC, Syria, etc.

      They say in Ukrainian sites that this is Putin’s doing. Either Putin shoots, or they shoot themselves. But in this case we are talking about the Americans, so they themselves could not be fired. Conclusion-Putin!
      1. +2
        13 October 2016 06: 40
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        it means they themselves could not fire. Conclusion-Putin!

        The explosion of the cruiser Maine ALSO indicates Putin’s involvement?
        1. +7
          13 October 2016 06: 43
          Quote: V.ic

          The explosion of the cruiser Maine ALSO indicates Putin’s involvement?

          Well, he himself could not explode. Have you heard about the earthquake in California in the early 20s? Need to explain who did it?
          1. +3
            13 October 2016 06: 54
            The Pentagon claims that the missile attack on the Mason destroyer necessitated a retaliatory strike, and the destroyer launched several salvos towards the coast, from where it was allegedly fired upon.
            The Americans are following in the footsteps of their idol Adolf .... they are provoking, as a pretext for starting a war.
            1. Erg
              +1
              13 October 2016 08: 44
              The war was not launched by Adolf, but by the same token, the Americans. More precisely, the Illuminati
        2. +1
          13 October 2016 06: 58
          The explosion of the cruiser Maine ALSO indicates Putin’s involvement?

          Well, why be surprised.? On ukrosayt all that do not write, all ride laughing ... And Hillary Clinton was poisoned by Putin, and he shot John Kennedy. Even the killing of Abraham Lincoln by his handiwork. I hope the SBU together with the FBI have already conducted an investigation into Putin’s involvement. We are waiting for sensations wassat
        3. cap
          +1
          13 October 2016 08: 23
          Quote: V.ic
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          it means they themselves could not fire. Conclusion-Putin!

          The explosion of the cruiser Maine ALSO indicates Putin’s involvement?


          The mistake is that Putin does not miss.
          The launch of the rocket as part of the crew of the TU 160 missile carrier was excellent.

          Not like F.Oland in a motorcycle helmet laughing
          https://yandex.ru/images/search?img_url
          1. jjj
            +2
            13 October 2016 09: 55
            The Yemeni scenario of "shelling" American ships vaguely reminds me of the incident in the Gulf of Tonkin on August 2 and 4, 1964, after which a large-scale war in Vietnam began. It's strange. More than half a century has passed, but the scenarios of the Americans have not changed. So they roam along the Black Sea, asking for.
            By the way, yesterday Russia launched three intercontinental missiles ...
            1. +1
              13 October 2016 11: 22
              Quote: jjj
              The Gulf of Tonkin on August 2 and 4, 1964, after which the large-scale war in Vietnam began. It’s strange. More than half a century has passed, and the Americans do not change the script. So they roam the Black Sea, beg for it.

              Americans are pragmatic in this regard, why come up with something if this method works. But here, too, there are problems.
              According to the logic of things, an attack on a ship and firing rockets by the US Navy should trigger an instant reaction, but only today there was infa about the suppression of 3 locators by Americans in Yemen.
              Something went wrong and immediately dropped out of reality, you need to contact, discuss, this even more suggests that all the accidents are not random !!!!!
      2. 0
        13 October 2016 10: 24
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Conclusion, Putin!

        maybe all the same air conditioners? Well, sometimes they did not fly .... wink
  2. +3
    13 October 2016 06: 31
    Quote: olhon
    All right. They fired themselves. As in the DNI, LC, Syria, etc.


    Just as they prepared for the explosion and blew up the twin towers on September 11!

    Striped partners are preparing public opinion for the next invasion of their troops, because China has already settled in this area and is building a military base for itself!
  3. +3
    13 October 2016 06: 32
    necessitated a retaliatory strike, and the destroyer fired several volleys towards the coast

    Probably the time has come for us to say loudly that the Americans are firing at themselves in order to find the reason for delivering attacks on the Hussites. They (Americans) taught this to Ukrainians, and why not the teachers themselves use this provocative information tactic?
    1. 0
      13 October 2016 08: 31
      also presented three missiles today. good
      1. 0
        14 October 2016 09: 26
        And were there rockets ?! Knowing about your digestive problems, I suspect that the shelling was carried out only because the American ship was irradiated with radar from the shore, so I fired at the location of the radar with a fright. But the press does not admit that the American military is so ahem ... careful that they open fire only because someone looked in their direction, so they wrote a story about three missiles supposedly launched in their direction. In fact, I do not care what you compose there to justify it, fairy tales will not add real fighting efficiency to you.
  4. +4
    13 October 2016 06: 52
    God loves a trinity ... From the third time they will fall ... wink
  5. +1
    13 October 2016 06: 54
    to put "bastions" there. with real (not paper) rockets.
    1. +1
      13 October 2016 08: 33
      We will also take out how the radars were carried out.
      1. 0
        14 October 2016 19: 45
        The main thing is that you don't run out of diapers and there is always a psychologist on duty and a soft room for "psychological relief" waiting on the shore! tongue
  6. +3
    13 October 2016 07: 10
    Americans in Syria got sick of fighting, but they need to fight - elections are in the offing.
    It seems that down experts from the State Department found a weak adversary.
    It will be interesting to see how the Hussites kick the ass exceptional ...
    1. +1
      13 October 2016 08: 16
      Quote: SarS
      It seems that down experts from the State Department found a weak adversary.
      It will be interesting to see how the Hussites kick the ass exceptional ...

      But they’ll kick it))))) The Husites are fighting well.
      Mattresses 15 years with the Taliban can not do anything ....
  7. +6
    13 October 2016 07: 25
    from the coast of Yemen, in the area of ​​the Bab el-Mandeb Strait controlled by the Hussite rebels, several missiles were fired. A number of American media claimed that the missiles launched on the ships of the US Navy were supposedly anti-ship. At the same time, the anti-ship missiles launched by the destroyer and the accompanying ship of the US Navy did not hit the target again ...

    As I wrote about the previous "attack", mattress toppers are looking for a reason for a new intervention. After all, the Houthis spread rot against their allies - the Saudis, so the striped men are looking for a loophole to open a new front in order to help their clumsy suckers. Naturally, when all these launches are far-fetched, it is difficult to expect a hit from them. This is only in the theater, if a gun is hanging on the wall, then at the end of the performance it will certainly fire. In life, it's a little different. If someone yells over and over that he was fired upon, but did not get hit so many, many times, then there is a great chance that these attacks are an ordinary invention in order to obtain some benefits or reasons for interfering somewhere.
    1. +6
      13 October 2016 08: 53
      WASHINGTON, Oct 13 - RIA Novosti, Dmitry Zlodorev. US forces attacked three radar installations in Yemen in response to shelling of an American ship, Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook said ....
  8. +5
    13 October 2016 07: 32
    The Tonkin Incident 2?
  9. +3
    13 October 2016 07: 35
    Impudence, lies and provocation are the main features of US policy. As a possible option, I see a reason for "clearing the field" for the actions of aviation.
  10. Erg
    +2
    13 October 2016 08: 49
    "One rocket did not reach the ship" ... Another sank too wassat Watching another act of the American Puppet Theater
  11. 0
    13 October 2016 11: 12
    Quote: rotmistr60
    to find the reason for striking the Hussites

    Information has already passed that the Americans struck a radar station in Yemen.
  12. +3
    13 October 2016 11: 12
    If the Hussites actually launched the missiles, then the missiles would fly and hit (as with that transporter), and so ...
  13. +2
    13 October 2016 13: 01
    Again the test tube clearly did not expect another.
  14. 0
    14 October 2016 11: 05
    They’re trying in vain, if the empire of good said that they were fired, that’s what it is, we also eat Syrian babies, Gadaffi was also a small fanatic, I’m silent about the Serbs, nothing, the brave mattress guys will come soon and tell you how to live right and democratic