Who benefits scold the Crimea. And the better time to rest at home than overseas

Today critical reviews about holidays in the Crimea have become very popular. They say that the prices on the peninsula are transcendental - “in Turkey it is much cheaper”, and there is no service, and it is dirty, and the rest are drunk, - which isn’t something about the Crimean resorts.

Comments

[c3r]

Military Review has become a branch of YouTube! Got Game!

[Darth Revan]

Is the article difficult to publish? And then it's time to rename the site in Voentub!

[sergeybulkin]

There you are:
Review: Rest in Crimea (Russia) - Horror from "Countess Leshchinskaya" in Yalta
Advantages:
the sea, there was a local fish in a cafe
Disadvantages:
rest
Was from 11.09 to 20.09 in Yalta. It's disgusting! Prices are going through the roof. I paid 4 thousand rubles for a room "Apartments at Countess Leshchinskaya" - This is stupidity and spoiled rest. Nearby they rented up to 2,5 thousand, and on the BEST conditions. There is no service. There is no cooler. The rooms are not cleaned, sometimes they forgot to give toilet paper (and then a strange-looking cleaner said that this was not so). The prices in the city are terrifying. Everything is expensive. 1 kg. local fish - 1000 rubles, a bottle of local wine 1000 rubles, similar in Moscow - 500 rubles, peaches 200-250, the rest is also EXPENSIVE, although it is local. Price list in a cafe for lunch for 1 from 500-600 rubles. I will never go to this place and to Crimea in general again. Crimea became worse and impudent, unfriendly. Very beautiful nature, but ... And I will not book more through Booking. They leave only good reviews, they don't post bad ones.

In general, the budget: 36000 housing of terrible quality and sky-high prices + 13 flights + 000 food (maybe a little more). Total about 10 rubles. and spoiled mood and time.
For the money you can take a good Spain and enjoy life ...
Draw your own conclusions. But I’m no more in the Crimea.
Last year - a boarding house Alushta with destroyed furniture 10 days * 2300 = 23 + 000 flights + 13000 self-catering = 7000 ... That is, the same in Europe is much cheaper. Let 43 days, but pleasure, not problems.
http://otzovik.com/

[sergeybulkin]

Review: Rest in Crimea (Russia) - Beautiful nature, overpriced, disgusting attitude towards tourists.
Advantages:
Beautiful nature, sea, air and mountains
Disadvantages:
Rudeness, poorly developed infrastructure, overpriced.
We went to Crimea in September - South Coast + Sudak. The places are beautiful, the roads are surprisingly good - they have never seen broken roads anywhere. In Feodosia and Sudak prices are adequate - housing for any wallet and cheap. But from Alushta, Yalta - it is impossible to overstate. Sanatoriums are being repaired, but so far not in the best condition. But the prices for this dilapidated scoop as in the best resorts in Europe ... But the most disgusting is the service. I do not know what influenced Crimeans there, but the attitude towards visitors is arrogant, dismissive and frankly boorish. And this is a common misfortune - starting from the airport, shops, pharmacies, museums. For all 11 days of rest, only a couple of people were more or less friendly. During the rest, the feeling that you owe something to everyone did not leave ... And the airport in Simferopol deserves a special conversation. At the exit you will be met by the indescribable smell of sewage. The airport is small, unadapted. The staff is frankly indifferent and sometimes rude. The infrastructure is completely out of order ...
09-2016

[sergeybulkin]

Review: Rest in Crimea (Russia) - rest from the heart
Hello, when it came time for rest, vacation with family, without thinking twice, we decided to choose Crimea, a wonderful city, beautiful nature, cool sea, friendly residents, a wonderful hotel, a lot of impressions, I wanted to stay there, and the children were thrilled, swimming until the evening , next time we’ll not even choose where to go, definitely Crimea
Year visited: 2015

[sergeybulkin]

Review: Rest in Crimea (Russia) - Excellent ...
Its and so beautiful.
At first, when he just arrived in Crimea, it seemed to me somehow faceless and empty. This view opened up upon arrival on the ferry. But as civilization around gradually opened up, my opinion changed dramatically. Simferopol made an impression of a very nice and welcoming town with small streets and a unique atmosphere. Heading to Alushta, I was pleasantly surprised by the benevolence of local residents. Transport in Alushta runs since Soviet times. The fare is inexpensive. Prices in stores are not very different from Moscow. Fruits are certainly cheaper. Near the beach, respectively, more expensive. The city itself is very clean. There are many tourists on the beach, especially in the evening. Alushta is a beach entirely with pebbles. Water is not clear on all beaches. Where to eat and with algae, jellyfish. Tours for all tastes. Renting a catamaran allows you to swim independently to nearby islands. Well, a trip to the swallow’s nest is generally just the peak of real pleasure. The real nice Russian spill. This is certainly one of the best resorts in the world, if not the best.
Year visited: 2015

[Ingvar 72]

Quote: sergeybulkin

jellyfish.

Jellyfish on the southern coast of Crimea is a seasonal phenomenon. End of August, beginning of September.

[Ingvar 72]

Quote: sergeybulkin

disgusting attitude to tourists.

This is most likely about Yalta. The inhabitants of Yalta have always been know-it-alls and snobs. In other areas, people are simpler.

[sergeyzzz]

So it’s too lazy to type, and then with the mouse poked twice and you're done.

[terminator978]

Well and what for me this video? Where is the article? Here adults sit, who first read, then comment / discuss, and the video is for teenagers who are too lazy to read and think. The video didn’t even open and I’m not going to, it’s a solid negative that turned VO into.

[thinker]

And I wrote about this, because there is a text version. http://yug.svpressa.ru/travel/article/137998/

[allllll]

But I was in Crimea this year and there is a certain negative. In short, the peninsula itself is beautiful, but everything that people have done and are doing there, including and for tourists, terrible. You can go wild to nature, hiking, ecotourism, unpretentious Soviet people who love food from canteens and pies on the beach, will also be good, and a modern resort tourist will be either bad or more expensive than competitors.

[FID]

Excuse me, but who, in fact, is the current "resort" tourist? "Managers" who get drunk on "all inclusive" without leaving the reception? Or ordinary Russians who are LOOKING for rest?

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: SSI

Excuse me, but who, in fact, is the current "resort" tourist? "Managers" who get drunk on "all inclusive" without leaving the reception? Or ordinary Russians who are LOOKING for rest?

And those and others!

[GSH-18]

Quote: SSI

Excuse me, but who, in fact, is the current "resort" tourist? "Managers" who get drunk on "all inclusive" without leaving the reception? Or ordinary Russians who are LOOKING for rest?

What's the difference? Are they not Russians or what? In addition, this is how the "managers" you disliked bring a real penny to the tourism industry of our new republic, and do not try to use the site to no avail, as some do.

[FID]

Excuse me, "do not try" - are you talking about yourself? Then yes.

[rotmistr60]

They talk about high prices and often the lack of a normal understanding of service for a long time, as soon as the Crimea became Russian. I think that this will work out over time. Obviously, the long stay of the peninsula near Ukraine still affects (if you want a kind of mentality).

[kalibr]

My friends were tempted and went to Alupka. The people - darkness, the place on the beach had to be taken from 7.00 am despite the fact that there is simply no beach there. In the morning you could find a "bunch" on the beach and ... settle down next to it. And this was, but how to remove it? The Vorontsovsky palace, of course, is good, and the park, but ... they did not live in the palace. It seemed that more visitors were "licked" in the Ukraine. Well, maybe this is a personal experience. As for me, I have been going to Crimea since 1962, then 78th, 91st, 93rd, 95th, 2005, 2010. That is, the genesis of its development as a recreation center was going on before my eyes and ... that's it. I won't go there again. Although, yes, the places there are beautiful. It is cheaper, and in some cases more profitable to rest in other places. Now we have places with excellent service - we have it at least 25 km from the same Anapa. There - g ... here is almost Cyprus. That is, of course, it's good that Crimea is ours and we need to go there, but I personally have enough there. However, a year ago I was in Pyatigorsk. Before that, he was there in 1988,89,90, XNUMX, XNUMX. So many streets have NOT CHANGED AT ALL. I was like a time machine in the past. Although many new houses have been added. What is not? COMPREHENSIVE IMPROVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT, all in some "pieces" - here OK, but here "Soviet excellent city ...". But it is clear that these are personal impressions.

[aba]

I think that this will work out over time.

Frankly ?! I doubt it ... In what sense will it get better ?! Will they repair, adjust, that is, invest money? So they need to be beaten off, so the prices will rise. And the fact that we have increased does not decrease.

[Hungary]

I will not say for the Crimea, this summer with his wife and child rested in Adygea. We enjoyed it a lot. But in 2 weeks, 200.000 - that's kind of a bit too much.