Dutch media publish "Commission conclusions" about the causes of the collapse of MH17
A few hours before the official announcement of the “international” investigative team (no one knows its composition so far), the results of a more than two-year investigation by NOS issues its publication. The materials of this NOS'a state that the investigation “established” the following:
The same material claims that the Buk complex was later returned to the territory of the Russian Federation.
NOS writes that the investigation team allegedly already gave such information to the relatives of the victims of the crash.
Earlier it was reported that the investigation team for a "confirmation of the facts" conducted a kind of "secret experiment" in Finland.
If the messages of the Dutch edition really repeat the conclusions of the “international commission”, then in this case it all resembles a protracted farce with elements of logical balancing act and mimicry.
At firstWhy was the experiment in Finland secret? Where can I find out about his progress and results? Why, actually, in Finland?
SecondlyWho will answer the questions of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation asked literally the next day after the crash of an airliner? Where is the publication of data on the flight recorders, negotiation dispatchers? Where is the data on the location of the Ukrainian air defense systems in the MH17 attack area? Where are the explanations about why the plane was taken over the epicenter of the fighting?
Third, What kind of “secret experiment can there be at all, if the“ experts ”from the crash site did not even take half of all the wreckage of the airliner?
Fourthlywhy the international group for more than two years could not determine either the type of ammunition, or the place of its launch, but suddenly - could it? ..
FifthlyWhy did Ukrainian artillery for days covering shells and mines with shells and mines if international agreements were reached to work at the crash site?
And there are quite a few such questions for publication, which clearly resembles a fit to the necessary conclusions of the “facts” that have been tampered with more than two years of “facts”.
Information