Dilma without a post

24
Brazilian senators finally supported the impeachment and deprived Dilma Rousseff of the presidential post. 61 Senator (required at least 54 votes) supported the accusations of Rousseff in budget frauds. The role of the head of state before 31 December 2018 of the year, that is, until the expiration of the powers that Rousseff could have, will be performed by Michel Temer.

Dilma without a post




Voting on the issue of impeachment was delayed for long hours. In the end, the senator's 81 voices were divided into unequal shares: the 61 people were impeachable and approved; 20 opposed the removal of Rousseff from office.

Those who voted for impeachment pointed to the budgetary frauds of the former president. Recall that the process itself was based precisely on these accusations, as well as on the corrupt component of the activities of some members of the Rousseff government.

The impeachment process was initiated in December last year. The prosecution in the Senate stated that the government headed by the president during the 2014-2015 period. used illegal methods of payment for social programs. Expenditures were postponed for the next financial period, which “improved” budget figures in the current period. At the same time, domestic government debt grew rapidly. The state, in the person of Rousseff, is indebted to commercial banks: the latter were the actual source of funding for wasteful government programs. Private banks were a lender, and the government was a borrower. It seemed that social programs were being implemented, and at the same time the state had built on debts something like a financial pyramid. Dilma failed to get out of monetary difficulties.

There was another accusation — corruption that is familiar to the entire planet. Speech about the cunning schemes concerning the state oil corporation “Petrobras”. The prosecutors of the former presidency say that Rousseff was the chairman of the board of directors of the corporation and could not but be aware of billion dollar frauds.

At the hearings in the Senate before the vote, Rousseff stated that she “would never have committed actions contrary to her beliefs and violating the rights of those who voted for her in the presidential election.” In her opinion, which led "Russian newspaper"If senators vote for her final removal from office and condemn an ​​innocent person in this way, a “parliamentary coup d'etat” will take place in the country.

Not all senators participated in the long “interrogation” of the accused. Correspondent "RG" indicates that the word was left "only for the most significant figures." This was done to speed up the impeachment procedure: it was planned to be completed in August. In this case, Michel Temer, acting head of state of the president, could go to the G20 summit as a full-fledged Brazilian leader in early September.

The presidential powers of Dilma Rousseff, save her post, would expire at the end of 2018. Since the final investigation and the final vote are over, and the impeachment has officially taken place, Brazil will be ruled by the end of the specified period by Michel Temer (previously Vice-President).

Rousseff did not put up with the decision of the senators and even promised to “return”, at the same time criticizing the impeachment as a woman-hate and anti-people decision. Her words leads "Life":

“Step against the nation and people. This is a misogynistic, sexist and homophobic decision. Indicator of intolerance, prejudice and violence. They think they have plunged us, but they are wrong. We will fight. We will act more firmly against them. We will be back. We will return to continue the movement to Brazil with a free people. I leave the presidency just as I came: without giving up my promises. I lived honestly, did everything in my power, did not run away from my responsibility. ”


At the same time, Dilma urged Brazilian women to fight for their rights and resist to machismo.

The defense of the former Brazilian leader has prepared two appeals to the Federal Supreme Court, reports "Reedus". Her lawyers insist that the process of removal from power took place with procedural violations.

Opponents of impeachment directly indicate its political overtones. In addition, the opponents of Temer claim some negative consequences of the work of the interim government. Senator Roberto Reciau notes that the government plans to privatize the national treasure.

Michel Temer, who is now officially considered the president of Brazil, also spoke. "I pledge to protect the unity, integrity and independence of Brazil," the newspaper quoted him as saying. "Sight".

Temer outlined the most important steps that he intends to take in his presidency: pay attention to the “ceiling” of government borrowing, pension reform, and growing unemployment and job creation: “We have a huge number of unemployed, almost 12 million, this is a terrible figure” .

At the G20 summit, the new president intends to meet with Xi Jinping and "begin to attract investment in the country."

He is in no hurry to drive Dilma out of the Palacio Alvorada residence. The president said that he gave the former head of state thirty days to move.

Also, Mr. Temer asked to stop talking about impeachment as a coup.

In essence, let us add, the most ordinary crisis in the country led to the impeachment, which erupted during the years of Rousseff’s second presidential term (2014 was re-elected in October, moreover, she already did not have much popularity among the people and won by a small margin: The party of the Brazilian Social Democracy Aesiu Nevis is only three and a few percentage points, besides, it was a victory in the second round). Her election campaign was based on populist slogans - as time showed, impracticable.

The promise turned out to be too wide: Dilma vowed to expand the already huge population coverage with the social programs “More Doctors”, “My Home, My Life”, etc., to create twelve million jobs by the 2018 year (by the end of the term of government), the story fight against corruption, ensure transparency of public administration, and much more. Almost all promises remained promises. The crisis struck. As usual, he was both economic and political.

The outcome of the 2015 of the year in the Brazilian economy, resulting from the reign of Rousseff, sums up TASS: GDP declined by 3,8% (the lowest figure since 1990 g), inflation rose to 7,97%; the real exchange rate depreciated by 24% against the dollar; unemployment in the first quarter of 2016 reached 10,9%. Among the main causes of the economic crisis is called only the decline in world prices for raw materials and food products exported by Brazil, but also the excessively high cost of social programs (only because of them the budget deficit grew from 2% of GDP in 2010 to 10% in 2015 g .). The budget was hit and huge spending on the Olympic Games 2016. (The planned budget - about 10 billion. Dollars.).

The government of Rousseff began to cut the state budget, cutting funding for the ministries of health, education, transport, defense and urban development, that is, it actually struck at its social programs. Moreover, taxes were increased. Of course, the collapse of social programs, along with measures on budgetary economy, caused discontent among citizens, as well as politicians, including within the ruling coalition.

The political scandal mentioned above, which broke out at the end of 2014, added fuel to the fire. It was about corruption in Petrobras in those years when Rousseff herself was the chairman of the governing council (2003-2010). Top managers of the corporation and high-ranking politicians, including former members of the government, were involved in the frauds.

Everything together lowered the already low popularity of Rousseff and her team below the baseboards: in 2015, the government positively assessed from 10 to 13% of the population.

Impeachment was the logical outcome of the political and economic crisis. It is absolutely unbelievable that the unpopular Rousseff overcome the “machismo” and after years returned to big Brazilian politics.

However, it is also unlikely that Mr. Temer will be able to earn popularity by bringing the country out of the crisis. He is unlikely to be able to fulfill the wishes of the population, accustomed to the benefits of social programs, but who do not understand where they come from by 2018.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    2 September 2016 06: 36
    Political coup with a democratic sauce.
    1. +1
      3 September 2016 07: 25
      A president who knows by heart Mayakovsky is extremely undesirable for the anxious states of America.
      1. 0
        3 September 2016 18: 45
        Moreover, her father was a Bulgarian convinced communist.
        Although she did not consider herself a communist, she was always "leftist".
        I already spoke about the underground experience of Dilma herself below.
    2. +2
      4 September 2016 04: 44
      Well, I wrote for a long time that Dilma will fly away, and for this I got a lot of minuses (then they still were).
      My next forecast: Venezuelan Maduro is next in turn. Within a year, he will begin to think about resuming the career of a bus driver, but there is no owner in the whole country willing to take a chance and entrust him with the steering wheel of the bus after he steered the country SO.
  2. +5
    2 September 2016 06: 46
    Those. what Lenin once said that any cook can rule the country is not true. You can’t build on the promises of a beautiful life. What am I doing? And besides, soon we have elections, and all the candidates rushed to promise one prettier than the other, and in the end it will be the same as in Brazil ... It was, is and will always be, because among the promises of today I personally do not see not one who could establish a normal life in the country. Those who could do this probably they are somewhere quietly walking among us, but they will not be elected to the deputies ...
    1. +3
      2 September 2016 12: 05
      Why did you all go about Lenin and the cook!
      He never wrote and said so!
      The exact phrase (the original source is the article "Will the Bolsheviks Retain State Power", the journal "Education" No. 1,2 October 1917):
      "We are not utopians. We know that any laborer and any cook are not able to immediately take over the government."
      In my opinion, the meaning is just the opposite - you have to study, and having acquired knowledge, (if you have enough mind) get the working class steering wheel. Since with the old intelligentsia we are not on the way.
      And Dilma, by the way, is a professional revolutionary with experience of underground work and torture in prison.
      And by education she is an economist with a bachelor's degree.
    2. +1
      2 September 2016 17: 04
      Tatar 174 Today, 06:46 AM New
      ... And besides, soon we have elections, and all the candidates rushed to promise one more beautiful than the other, but in the end it will be the same as in Brazil ...


      will not be like in Brazil. Impeachment is not possible in Russia. Can you imagine the Duma or the senators voting against the president? or who voted against anything that the government proposed?
  3. +3
    2 September 2016 07: 14
    Again, the Indos were in a hurry (as in Hohland).
  4. +9
    2 September 2016 07: 38
    Michel Temer’s attitude towards BRICS is interesting. This is silent. And will not Brazil turn around 180 degrees? There are more questions than answers.
    1. +1
      2 September 2016 09: 34
      So I have the same question .... but what if (and there are historical incidents) everything that happened in Brazil in terms of impeachment is the "handiwork" of the United States (CIA) in order to "knock out the player" from the BRICS. We remember Chile ..., well, etc. Allende was removed the truth even more harshly.
      1. 0
        5 September 2016 10: 07
        What are you saying?
        Politics in South and Central America from the USA has always been dealt with by crystal-clear people (and never having thought about personal gain).
        And they never heard of Operation Condor (which Dilma apparently fell under), and they did not provide business to American companies in Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala and Nicaragua.
        The word contra does not cause them any associations.
        They didn’t know Batista in Havana.
        And they don’t even know where and how in the Gulf of Pigs in Cuba 1500 armed people with 10 tanks and 20 armored vehicles appeared - apparently washed ashore after a storm.
        The massive influx of American tourists to Grenada in 1982 (8000 people) and Panama in 1989 (26 people) with their transport was caused only by their desire to enjoy the charms of the nature of these countries and have a good time.
        And these people can only be blamed for one sin - an ardent love of democracy and the peoples of the Center and South America.
        And for the economic prosperity of the same Brazil, these people are ready to spend the last Brazilian dollar.
    2. +2
      2 September 2016 09: 51
      Here the main privatization of state property is visible. And who will buy? Again, henchmen, like ours. The common people have no money for this. So the goal is clear.
      1. 0
        5 September 2016 10: 46
        Buyers are already identified!
        If someone has already forgotten our 90s privatization, find out about the economic policies of Violetta de Chamorro in Nicaragua from 90 to 96. And privatization in particular.
        And also remember the privatization of state property and the binding of the national currency to the dollar in Argentina in the late 1990s - early 2000s (followed by default).
        These are the most likely scenarios for future Brazil.
        And if after that someone says that the privatization of large and medium state property is the path to the prosperity of a wide class of owners, then he is either a blessed person or they are paid for it.
  5. +7
    2 September 2016 08: 34
    Quote: Tatar 174

    2
    Tatar 174 Today, 06:46 AM New
    Those. what Lenin once said that any cook can rule the country is not true. You can’t build on the promises of a beautiful life. What am I doing? And besides, that soon we have elections, and all the candidates rushed to promise one more beautiful than the other, but in the end it will be the same as in Brazil ..

    --------------------------------------
    I completely agree with you. The same "United Russia" from 2003-2004 made many different promises, but did not fulfill a single one. No jobs, no affordable, comfortable housing. Now there is only cutting off already meager payments, and this is after the "rollover" of the ruble in half. But if we created or took care of our own production, then we would calmly survive any crisis without the notorious "import substitution and innovation."
    1. 0
      5 September 2016 06: 35
      - Comfortable housing is available to me
      - There is a workplace that 10 years ago could not have happened (because I work in a completely new industry)
      “Around me are just as successful people; over the past five years, almost all have doubled, tripled, quadrupled wealth.”
      Import substitution also works.
      Strange you - maybe you are one of those who work on stone technology? And did not want to be in the wave of progress and relearn?
  6. +1
    2 September 2016 09: 30
    Quote: Smog
    Michel Temer’s attitude towards BRICS is interesting.

    ----------------------------
    I also thought about this, a sharp turn towards the USA of the largest economy of Latin America is possible.
  7. 0
    2 September 2016 12: 19
    We should support Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia and lower the status of relations with Brazil after the coup.
    1. +4
      2 September 2016 18: 58
      [quote.] downgrade relations with Brazil after the coup [/ quote]
      Maybe you shouldn’t just cut it off your shoulder like that? It’s never too late to lower the status of relations. Moreover, nothing is clear about the course of the Brazilian government. A thin world is better than a good quarrel.
  8. 0
    2 September 2016 12: 31
    The main accusation of Rusef is the financing of social programs at the expense of the state debt!
    So she strives for a bright capitalistic future for rich countries!
    Short reference - national debt of countries in relation to GDP (2015):
    Brazil -74%
    UK -89%
    USA -106%
    Japan -248%
    And if the Americans and the Japanese print bucks and yens and they all take it, then Brazil has a lesser public debt, a coup at once.
    Although in theory impeachment should be the US president.
    1. 0
      4 September 2016 11: 32
      You forget about the budget deficit to GDP. 10% is a hell of a lot
      In the USA 2.5% in Russia 3.3%. And both countries consider this indicator an enormous problem. And then 10%.
      1. 0
        4 September 2016 19: 45
        In general, it was a question of the general policy of the rich states of pumping up social and other programs at the expense of the state debt, and let’s say, in theory, this should be equivalent to what our Central Bank calls the “norm of obligatory reservation”.
        And if we take into account that the state budget is far from GDP (in the United States, with state budgets that are not included in the state budget, it is even more interesting), and also considering that in any case, not all of the budget can be used to service the public debt (eat something it is necessary), then a very interesting conclusion suggests itself - it is necessary to "take away the license" from someone with the subsequent bankruptcy. And refinancing of interest on debt and principal payments will be possible only by issuing new debt obligations (that is, a debt pyramid). That is what the Americans are doing now with the help of their "treasury obligations".
        And this is where the USA, Japan and Brazil are shown. In terms of the probability of default.
        If I understand you correctly, your claim (ultimately) to me consists precisely in the different rates of raising the national debt of Brazil against others, but I had in mind only the above.
        1. 0
          5 September 2016 05: 39
          The United States owes in dollars, and they themselves issue them. They do not care with a high bell tower how much they owe.
          1. 0
            5 September 2016 07: 41
            That's right, and they don't care as long as we reverently perceive them as a "gift of God" and a universally stable measure of value.
  9. 0
    5 September 2016 10: 26
    The president behaved more stupidly and stupidly. The main stupidity is re-election for a second term without a clear program of action. And also stupidity out of competition - public anger at the American wiretap. I really imagined myself to be the head of state at the level of Stalin, huh ... A democratic president can only be robbed with impunity. Any really independent actions aimed at the prospect of more than three months will be his / her sentence. Which is what happened.
    The only person who can really rule his country on the planet is Putin. Because for us he is not so much the president, of course, as the Supreme Commander. And then ... Joseph Vissarionovich! Why did you leave us ...