Dilma Rowseff, who was finally removed from power, accused senators of a parliamentary coup

21
The night before, it became known that Brazilian President Dilma Rouzeff was finally removed from office in the presidency. The Brazilian Senate by a majority vote voted for the impeachment of Dilma Rouseff, who until that moment had been suspended by the same Senate (for 180 days) from presidential duties. The 61 senator opposed 20 who did not support the initiative for impeachment.

Dilma Rouseff herself, who was accused of corruption crimes, claims that all charges against her are far-fetched.
From her speech to supporters who are in Brazil, a lot:



The Senate decided to interrupt the powers of the president who did not commit crimes. They made a real parliamentary coup.


Dilma Rowseff, who was finally removed from power, accused senators of a parliamentary coup


In fact, no evidence at the court level of accusations against Dilma Rouseff was found in Brazil. Therefore, statements by the ousted president about a parliamentary coup are not without meaning.

After the impeachment of Rouseff, MichelleTemer will serve as president. According to Brazilian laws, the president will not be directly in the country until 2018, for which the next elections are scheduled. Previously, Temer was already in the position and. Brazilian President - for the same 180-day period during which the “Rouseff guilt trial” was conducted.

It should be added that Dilma Rousseff’s Brazilian parliamentarians did not deny the possibility of holding any public office, as was originally announced.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    1 September 2016 08: 03
    The United States, put the squeeze on, carried out "its" president, and will now try to destroy the BRICS.
    1. +1
      1 September 2016 08: 27
      But what about. She was independent. However, they did not take into account that she had a long struggle from the bottom for power. It will be very sweet for these senators.
      1. jjj
        +2
        1 September 2016 10: 28
        The situation shows that the state system according to the Western democratic model easily leads to a palace coup. Here, even Pinochet was not required. It is also interesting that the impeachment of the president on charges of corruption was started by people against whom anti-corruption cases have already been instituted
        1. +1
          2 September 2016 20: 12
          The situation shows that the state system according to the Western democratic model easily leads to a palace coup.


          Can't you admit that she, being on the board of directors, has made some trouble at an oil company since 2004-2010? Do you see the hand of s everywhere? And you have a strange logic, it turns out bad when a president involved in corruption can be removed by expressing no confidence in parliament? Is it better when they rule until they can take it out with their feet first, or with a bloody putsch and revolution? The fact of the matter is that when a high-ranking politician knows that he is being controlled and does not have absolute power, then he is less likely to fight. And in general, impeachment is not a "coup d'etat", but a civilized and legal way to remove from power a president who has lost confidence. Schroeder, by the way, was also removed from power, the majority simply did not agree with his method of government and part of the reforms.
  2. +10
    1 September 2016 08: 17
    She will now be blamed for all the imperfections of the Olympics, plus attacks on athletes ... well, it’s clear that she stole and organized everything .... and the man was not so sickly to be acting President two years. And no elections are needed. In short, the United States put its overseer on the plantation.
    1. +1
      2 September 2016 20: 18
      And who said there would be no election? This is the interim president, before the election. And re-election is not immediately appointed because of such cases, since it is a matter of the president’s personal responsibility, not his program, or of any reforms that, in the opinion of the majority in parliament, harm the country.
  3. +1
    1 September 2016 08: 18
    Two-thirds plus 1. The Yankees did a good job, but on the verge of a foul. Nevertheless, an indicative flogging was carried out. who is next bully
    1. +1
      1 September 2016 08: 28
      Armenia, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan ...... Turkey ....... Asia .... etc.
      1. 0
        1 September 2016 19: 58
        Quote: su163
        Armenia, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan ...... Turkey ....... Asia .... etc.

        From Azerbaijan, wait for the news on September 11. The opposition with the Western embassies has muddied something.
        1. 0
          2 September 2016 20: 19
          Yes, I thought so, she began to see Nuland’s mistress as Karimov’s mistress and, on the quiet, gave him a bite to bite .., and the old aksakal bit it ..
  4. 0
    1 September 2016 08: 24
    Well, it’s not ears anymore, but the whole meridic erysipelas got out of this heap! How similar all their unproven evidence is!
  5. +1
    1 September 2016 08: 50
    it seems to me, all because of the name request
  6. +1
    1 September 2016 08: 53
    Well now, Temer, will be engaged in the privatization of state property ...
    They steal everything that can be done exactly like ours under Eltsin ...
  7. +1
    1 September 2016 08: 57
    Quote: soroKING
    it seems to me, all because of the name request


    Тем Temer’s friends, Zionists rejoice ... They brought to power their
  8. +1
    1 September 2016 09: 26
    Brazil fell for an oil hook. Started
    invest in the development of the shelf, where they found a lot of oil.
    When prices collapsed, all investments disappeared.
    The economy began to fail.
    Brazilians - hot guys - do not like when living standards fall.
    They started to put pressure on the Senate. They did an impeachment.
    1. 0
      2 September 2016 20: 23
      So the Brazilians in general are such people, they were given the World Cup for them, and they took to the streets in millions, when they learned that most of the investments in the stadiums came from the budget, and not as promised, from private sponsors and they tell us stadiums and the World Cup when we have not enough hospitals!
  9. 0
    1 September 2016 10: 57
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Brazil fell for an oil hook. Started
    invest in the development of the shelf, where they found a lot of oil.
    When prices collapsed, all investments disappeared.
    The economy began to fail.
    Brazilians - hot guys - do not like when living standards fall.
    They started to put pressure on the Senate. They did an impeachment.

    And what is the standard of living there? In general, today Brazil is on the rise, but over the past couple a pronounced decline has been observed. In Brazil, there has never been sustainable prosperity, people here are already accustomed to a constant crisis and that over time, life continues to worsen. Only traditional Latin American gaiety and love of life does not bite, Brazilians like to have fun and dance, despite all the privacy of fate. GDP per capita in Brazil

    In Brazil, per capita GDP is $ 15690, Costa Rica and Venezuela are nearby, Chile has an indicator of 23564, neighboring Argentina has 22375, and Haiti has 1794. Speaking about today, by the end of 2015, Brazil showed a recession of -3,0 , 10%, only Venezuela, which showed a decline of 6,0%, is worse, but, for example, Panama, which does not have oil reserves, has a 2015% GDP growth rate for XNUMX. The general recession of the Brazilian economy may be associated in general with the recession in the development and attraction of investments in third world countries that are oriented to sales, which are constantly decreasing in the price of natural resources.
  10. +1
    1 September 2016 11: 01
    Now interesting; whom, when and how pend @ sy will be punished for rapprochement with Russia ..? Who is next?
  11. +1
    1 September 2016 12: 50
    There are also a lot of questions to Temar in terms of corruption, as well as to many senators, congressmen, state governors and prefects of communes. He didn’t specifically study the issue, but it’s very curious who will become president if Temar (whose popularity is much less than Rusef) is also dismissed.
    1. 0
      1 September 2016 16: 19
      it is very curious who will become president, if Temara (whose popularity is much smaller compared to Rousseff) is also dismissed.

      Chairman of the Senate
  12. 0
    2 September 2016 14: 31
    maybe it was necessary entot parliament as EBNuty. Tanks. AND?