Poverty and extinction of Russia

55 654 734
Poverty and extinction of Russia


Poverty and demographics


Russia's extinction has been acknowledged at the highest level. Dignitaries talk about a demographic catastrophe, about measures to support large families, about the consumer consciousness that has taken hold of society, etc.



However, this is all empty talk and an imitation of vigorous activity. There is and has been no demographic strategy. More precisely, there is, but it is a strategy of extinction.

In particular, the One of the reasons for Russia's extinction is literally beggarly wages in 30-50 thousand rubles. And to get a little more - 60-80 thousand, you need to work 6 days a week, with overtime, up to 12 hours a day. In particular, this is the salary at the Russian auto giant - AvtoVAZ.

The same salaries are paid at many industrial enterprises in the Russian Federation, where the last pre-retirement Soviet generations are working out their days. This leads to another problem - soon there will be no one to work at the factories.

And employers are moaning about the personnel shortage. Of course, people don't want to work for food. When you can go to a warehouse, for example, "OZON" or "Wildberries", and without education, work experience, etc., get from 100 thousand.

Such beggarly wages create another problem - they psychologically break men. And then they are killed physically, through alcoholism, drug addiction, strokes and heart attacks, domestic trauma, etc. Excess mortality literally mows down Russian men.

In the subcortex of men is written - "breadwinner of the family". Naturally, poverty does not allow to start a full-fledged family, to give birth to two or three children. It becomes the cause of domestic drunkenness, when a person leaves the real world for the illusory one, violence, crime and destroys families.

Russia needs another strategic development program – “Men”. Normal male education (from family to universities, boys are raised only by women), decent salaries that allow them to support a full-fledged family, physical and military culture (Poverty and demographics).

The image of the future


The main reason for the extinction of the Russian super-ethnos is the lack of a bright image of the future.

The new nobility has this image: the “bourgeois” West. Western Europe, the USA, Canada, Australia. Since the 1990s, children and grandchildren, families, mistresses and lovers have been taken there. Capital. They created "backup airfields". And in Russia they "worked" for a beautiful life there.

In December 1999, a theoretical article then Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's "Russia at the Turn of the Millennium", where Portugal was listed as the first target for catch-up development. The Russian leadership has long expressed a desire to create a common economic space with a united Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok.

Putin in 2000 asked US President Bill Clinton on the possibility of Russia joining NATO. In 2023, the Russian president reminded on Russia’s attempts to become “one of its own, bourgeois” for the West:

"We thought that we were our own, bourgeois, we want to be in this family of so-called civilized nations. And I threw my fishing rods into NATO, let's take a look at us."

For ordinary people, the image of the future is largely associated with the USSR, social justice. Working social lifts, when the children of peasants and workers can fully reveal their creative and intellectual potential. Become astronauts, academics, marshals, scientists and designers.

In the USSR, new generations of people were brought up who became creators and builders. It was a society of knowledge, service and creation. A society of the future, where the physical, intellectual and spiritual potential of man was fully revealed.

Hence the unprecedented investments in human capital, in children and youth (in the future of the country). In the school, which has become the best in the world. In the houses of culture and creativity, music and fine arts schools and colleges, design bureaus and research institutes, etc.

Under Stalin, the USSR began to build a “Golden Age” society, a “beautiful distant one.” "Utopia!" - cynics and Westerners will exclaim. However, if we look at the facts, we will see that there were results and what they were!

Society, people, inspired by a great idea, truth, justice, literally worked miracles. Built an industrial superpower out of the poverty and devastation of the 20s. Won the Second World War. Rebuilt the country after a terrible war. Was the first to go into space. People built the best school in the world. Made breakthroughs in science and technology, rushed to the stars.

In his book "Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR" Stalin stated that it is necessary to come to a 5-hour working day. So that the Soviet person could develop, raise the cultural level. Be more involved with family, education of children. And therefore - and become happier, which is the ultimate goal of any state.

This is the trouble with modern Russia: the nobility wants to live like the European "masters", and the people see the foundations of the future Russia in the Soviet civilization. Since the USSR was the pinnacle of development and the whole stories Russia.

And without a beautiful, attractive image of the future for the people. Without support for the code-matrix of Russian civilization - justice, ethics of conscience, the Russian world has no future. Only further extinction, decay and destruction.
734 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    27 December 2024 18: 17
    Quote: p-k
    Sorry, but the answer is clear.

    Partly true, many in 91-2000 had businesses that went bankrupt, closed, gray payment schemes or small salaries, the generation of 70+ a little more than 20-25 thousand, the generation of 60+ 16-18 thousand. I judge by the women in the entrance (retirement "rad2 zone 55 years, but there are practically no men in the entrance over 55+ left 2 people for 5 floors, all moved in at the same time in 81 complete families).
    1. 0
      27 December 2024 18: 36
      The woman agreed to retire at 50, the man at 55, in accordance with the benefits in connection with the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant.
    2. 0
      28 December 2024 13: 42
      90% of Russian men don't live to 60. I think this is a deliberate government policy.
    3. 0
      30 December 2024 09: 18
      My father was a small businessman in the 90s. He paid taxes regularly, including to the Pension Fund. The amounts were not small, because the income of even a small businessman was higher than the average salary in the country. He paid for more than 10 years. Then he went to work as a hired worker in construction. As a result, his pension was calculated at 15 thousand rubles - much less than if he had simply worked in an office for an average salary. Why pay taxes in Russia if you will be screwed in old age? This is a reasonable question.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. 0
    27 December 2024 19: 24
    Quote: Novosibirsk
    Russia has jumped into capitalism so much that it has become one of the most unfair capitalist countries in terms of the wealth gap between citizens. We will definitely have a backward semi-colonial capitalism like the Asian or Latin American one. That is why we need socialism. Otherwise, under the current oligarchic order, we will continue to slide into barbarism.

    Vladimir Lizun

    Who would argue? Name the method of achieving it. There is no need to even mention elections.
    1. 0
      29 December 2024 10: 39
      There's no need to even mention the elections


      Russians have only tried elections once - when the entire drunk country voted for an alcoholic with one brain who shot up the Parliament and started two Chechen wars. Everyone voted with their hearts, because they are basically incapable of thinking with their brains. The same thing is happening now. Dudes with dementia and those who have settled in have been voting for 1 years for who knows who. The rest sit at home on the couch and whine about how their vote doesn't decide anything. Of course it doesn't, because there is no vote at all.
      1. 0
        30 December 2024 04: 00
        The rest sit at home on the couch and whine about how their voice doesn't decide anything. Of course it doesn't, because there is no voice at all.

        1986 EBN rating 3..6%, the campaign "Vote or lose" is launched, aimed at attracting young people to vote. Numerous methods of agitation were used from the media campaign to public dances of the electioneering party itself and election promises. As a result, Yeltsin gets 35% in the first round, and 65% in the second.
        That's how they got me off the couch.
  4. 0
    27 December 2024 19: 32
    Quote: APASUS
    The paradox of our capitalism is that the poor are considered to be working people. Not marginalized people, old people or disabled people, but those who have a job and, as a rule, are raising children.

    I agree with this 100%. At our work... after another reform... one was puzzled. what tax do we pay to the social security? went. they explained to him. that your company will save up a certain amount and you can use it to get a voucher and have a rest with your children. the idiot believed it. went to find out in a couple of years. and to him... what voucher. only for single mothers with children)))
    I don’t know what vacation, sick leave and other holidays are, I have money, but I didn’t become rich, a paradox.
  5. 0
    27 December 2024 19: 46
    Quote from Turbuta Dave
    I beg of you .
    The cult of the worker and the collective farm woman has already taken place in Russia. It is the proactive people and business that create added value. The state simply needs to regulate this wisely.

    What is the difference between capitalism and imperialism? In the first, competition prevailed. In the second, monopoly. Now our oligarchs, monopolists, you suggest competing with Rotenberg, Abramovich and others. I really want to know the method.
  6. 0
    27 December 2024 20: 44
    Excellent article! Alexander Samsonov generally produces very interesting materials. On my own behalf I will add that if the Russian Federation does not change its political course, many of us will still have time to see the collapse of Russia! Or rather, the collapse is already underway.....
  7. +1
    28 December 2024 12: 57
    Stop moaning, whiners. Putin approved the renaming of Rostov to Rostov the Great, so now all the troubles are behind us
  8. +1
    28 December 2024 13: 56
    My deep couch opinion.
    1. Forget the USSR, RI, Evpatiy Kolovrat.
    Everything was better before! The grass was greener and the girls were younger and the tools were harder!
    2. Salvation of the Russian Federation at the present stage:
    a. total robotization of the economy.
    b. total reduction of bureaucracy.
    c. cancellation of payments to all international organizations.
    g. maximum cleansing of NON-NATIVE PEOPLES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION from citizenship. Preventing the acquisition of citizenship in the future. Issue only visas and residence permits without social payments. Direct the freed-up social payments to improve the lives of the indigenous population.
    2. A profound reform of education. Destruction of all private higher education institutions. Introduction of quotas and work-offs according to specialty.
    3 And so on and so forth.
    My wife called, I rushed over, I'll finish writing later)))
    1. -1
      29 December 2024 10: 33
      So you practically described communism? :)
  9. 0
    30 December 2024 02: 06
    I read an article by one activist, where he explained why they do not raise salaries in the energy sector for line employees. For fitters, electricians, drivers, in general, workers. It turns out that this is how they take care of preventing inflation growth. It is more profitable to keep 10 workers at 40-50 thousand rubles with low qualifications than to implement modern automatic installations. Because they cost a lot of money and the personnel for their maintenance will have to be paid more. And this means that the inflation rate will increase. And it does not matter that 3 of these specialists are needed. The main thing is not to increase inflation.
    The question of where the money goes and why our energy systems are worn out to a deplorable state remains unanswered. The main thing is to prevent an increase in the inflation rate due to an increase in workers' wages.
  10. P
    0
    30 December 2024 18: 27
    Portugal? So the main goal of the overwhelming majority of the population should be the idea of ​​sending the latifundist class and the royal family on vacation to Neptune?
  11. P
    +1
    30 December 2024 18: 30
    The author lets it slip that the main thing is "results" and following a specific project, but he continues to sniff the glue of idealism with its images
  12. -2
    31 December 2024 13: 27
    "One of the reasons for the extinction is the beggarly wages" - I don't quite agree: poor families have many more children. Moreover, this has almost always been the case in Rus'...
    I know many poor families with four or five children; I don’t know a single rich family with five children.
  13. 0
    31 December 2024 17: 40
    Where did the author find a salary of 30-50 thousand rubles, especially at enterprises? I'm just curious...
    An example of wages in the Tyumen region is in the picture to the comment.
    It seems like a typical custom job in the style of "everything is sad, everything is depressing, time to get out." Of course, there are depressed areas far from infrastructure, where there really is no work. Then the solution is shift work, where the salary reaches 200 thousand rubles. The main thing is that your hands are not from your ass.
    And the problem with extinction is connected, according to my observations:
    With the propaganda of liberal values ​​or hedonism in one word;
    The huge number of abortions in the country is a consequence of propaganda;
    Mass emigration (according to statistics from the Russian Foreign Ministry, 91 million Russians left from 2008 to 10) is comparable to the losses in the world war, which is also a consequence of propaganda;
    There is a huge number of divorces, and this is also a consequence of propaganda.

    There is an intensified cognitive and information war being waged against us, and it seems that the author of this article, consciously or not, is fighting against us.
  14. 0
    31 December 2024 17: 52
    Khabarovsk, Irkutsk, Yakutia.
    1. 0
      31 December 2024 18: 06
      Work for those who are not afraid to work
  15. -3
    31 December 2024 20: 53
    The author's article is correct, but the authorities do not read such things, because the interests of this government are anywhere but in Russia. Unfortunately, a huge number of residents of the country still associate their future with Putin. This is wrong. Putin is essentially a liberal and a backslider. He needs to please Washington. The last thing he will think about is the future of Russia and its people. Because not by their words, but by their deeds, one must judge. And all the deeds of this government are only for themselves. This is capitalism, baby, that's how it is. We missed socialism and the USSR. Now it's only like this. And Russia has no future with this government, the author is 100% right here.
  16. -2
    31 December 2024 21: 12
    But the priests are in oil these days. Like in the Russian Empire. And the bun-crunchers are happy to kick corpses.
  17. 0
    2 January 2025 23: 36
    I don't understand, what is this article about? About the results of the rule of the VVP for 25 years? So why can't the author say it directly? What "bourgeois" Constitution? Not long ago, amendments were made about everything that a Russian citizen really lacks.
  18. 0
    3 January 2025 21: 08
    As sad as this prospect is, I have to agree with it 97%.
  19. +1
    9 January 2025 12: 43
    In particular, one of the reasons for Russia's extinction is literally beggarly salaries of 30-50 thousand rubles.

    The level of wages is a very slippery subject, especially if you compare it to the times of the USSR. In the USSR, almost everyone saved, no one lived from paycheck to paycheck. And there was nowhere to spend it, compare the stores then and now. And now people spend, and spend everything. And they even take out loans. But if you cite the times of 1939 - 1980 as an example, then at least be honest with yourself. Are you ready to break your back so much to build a high-tech country? Or to win a war? Are you ready to sacrifice store abundance for the sake of a planned economy? Are you ready to refuse foreign products, preferring a domestic manufacturer? Exactly. In my opinion, everyone is ready to just stand in line for an apartment and a car. Well, so that no one is richer, so as not to envy.
  20. 0
    25 January 2025 15: 46
    About 10 years ago I was in charge of an oil refinery in Eastern Siberia. Since I was on a business trip and my home and family were far away, I was always at work at the plant or in the office. One day at about 9 pm I was walking through the office and a girl of about 30 came towards me. I asked her why she didn't go home if she had a husband and children. She answered that she had children, but they were all with distant aunts/grandmothers in the villages (and this was in winter). And she explained that she had given birth to three children for the sake of maternity capital (which businessmen cash out for 25%), and scattered the children among relatives who had formalized guardianship for them in order to receive at least some money in the villages. There is work only in the summer on our plots, and we need something to eat. So that's our entire demographics!
  21. PXL
    0
    26 January 2025 10: 19
    The concern in the article is funny. So what if the Russians are dying out? They are not the first, and they are not the last. The author cites the times of the USSR as an ideal. They say that such were the great achievements. But at what price were they made? For some reason, the author does not mention this. Everything that is happening now has its roots in the times of the USSR! And in general, the Chinese and Jews, for example, have a history of several thousand years. But who can call themselves a direct descendant of the ancient Romans or the same Gauls? Modern Italians and French? I doubt it very much. And who will remember the same Khazars now? There was such a great people, famous for choosing Judaism from various monotheistic religions. And because of this choice, they eventually disappeared instead of becoming the chosen people. Here is a direct analogy with Soviet communism. They wanted to build a paradise on Earth, and now they are dying out. And in such a situation they started a war...