Capitulation with reservations

12
Having surrendered a significant part of their overseas territories to 1940 – 1943 in Japan without a fight, our allies in the anti-Hitler coalition already in 1945 declared war on the national liberation movement that had engulfed the former colonies.

2 September 1945 of the United States battleship Missouri signed the Unconditional Surrender Act of Japan. This was made possible thanks to the lightning-quick defeat of the Kwantung Army by Soviet troops with the participation of the Mongolian People's Republic. The main land force of Japan for one and a half weeks suffered a crushing defeat in the north of Korea and in northeast China. But it seems to be folded weapon Imperial troops were very useful in Southeast Asia (Southeast Asia) to our Western allies as metropolises.



Capitulation with reservationsIndonesia declared independence from Holland already 17 August, Vietnam from France - exactly 2 September, at the same time, the liberation movement in Malaya, Cambodia, Laos, Burma, Singapore, in the US-owned Philippines intensified. These territories, we recall, were occupied by Japan in 1940 – 1943.

By the end of August - the beginning of September 1945, North China (with the participation of the Mongolian People's Republic troops), South Sakhalin, the Kuril archipelago were also liberated. According to Churchill, “even the atomic bombings carried out by the United States did not lead to such a disastrous defeat of Japan. Under the influence of the Soviet factor, as well as Mongolia’s participation in the Soviet military campaign in the Far East, one after another, the territories in Southeast Asia began to declare independence. ” Already in August-September, the war with the “separatists” started by the West was actively involved by the non-disarmed for the most part and not withdrawn Japanese occupation forces. For the western allies of the USSR by the end of August 1945 did not even come close to “their” vast territories in Southeast Asia with a few exceptions (Burma, the Philippines, the eastern part of Indonesia). In general, at least 40 of thousands of Japanese soldiers and officers (including police units) with weapons attached to them, tried to sip the national liberation movement in the region along with the colonialists in the blood.

It is noteworthy that the Western armed forces almost did not oppose Japanese aggression in Southeast Asia (with the exception of US Army units in some parts of the Philippines). For example, the British Singapore and Hong Kong were surrendered to the Japanese without resistance. But the war for the restoration of the colonial status of the territories was carried out, as they say, with full dedication.

The founders of independent Vietnam and Indonesia, Ho Chi Minh and Sukarno, Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek, General de Gaulle, and even the commanders of Western forces in the region recognized that the unprecedentedly quick and strategically unique rout of the Kwantung Army literally stirred up the liberation movement. According to the Dutch Governor of Indonesia, van Mooc (October 1945), “no one, perhaps, could have expected that after the exhausting war with Germany, the USSR would deal with the Kwantung Army so quickly. This could not but inspire the local population of other territories to fight for independence. For the Japanese troops there have been inactive since mid-August, and the allies were still not close to many of these territories. Thus, the Netherlands’s troops began to arrive in the region only by mid-September, the British — a little earlier, the French — later the Dutch. ”

The colonial war unleashed by the French and British in Malaya (now Western Malaysia) and Indochina also involved some military units of Thailand, an ally of Japan at that time. By the way, France surrendered Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam to her without resistance, and Thailand soon included in its membership the western regions of both countries bordering it. But by mid-September 1945, Bangkok had given up the captured lands to the former "owners."

According to the available information, Chiang Kai-shek, Marshal Khorlogyn Choibalsan and Mahatma Gandhi, reasonably suspected the West that the main task for him even at the cost of military defeats in Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific was to expand Japanese aggression in China and, if possible, send it to the USSR (incidentally - to ally him Mongolia). In any case, until 1944, the headquarters of China, where the main front of the land war with Japan was, was not a member of the joint Asian-Pacific committee of the military headquarters of the United Kingdom, United States, Australia and New Zealand. However, in this structure there was no De Gaulle "free France", although Indochina, the port area of ​​Gaungzhouwan (near Hong Kong) and most of the southern and central Pacific islands were considered to belong to Paris ...

The colonial war of our ex-allies fought with particular cruelty. Killed, missing, injured over 4 millions of local residents, including many heroes of the anti-Japanese resistance. The USSR and China, of course, helped the peoples of the region in their struggle with the colonialists. It was only at the end of 1962 that the Western military and political attempts to restore the colonial order in Southeast Asia were put to the end: the part of Holland belonging to Papua New Guinea (West Irian) became Indonesian. But as a result of these wars, Vietnam was split up until the spring of 1975, the armed confrontation in Malaya lasted until the end of 50, in Indonesia - until 1953, in Indochina - until the middle of the same decade. The Philippines (in 1946, but the United States deployed military bases there) and Burma (in 1948) gained independence before others.

Nevertheless, the region remained under police supervision of the West. In 50 – 60-s, military-political blocs (SEATO, then ANZUK and ANZUS) were created in South-East Asia and Oceania to “contain” the USSR and the PRC, to combat the communist and anti-colonial movements.

In short, the defeat of the Kwantung Army and the subsequent surrender of Japan became, one might say, the starting point of a new and generally successful stage of the anti-colonial struggle of the peoples of Southeast Asia. But, we note, both in Europe and in the Asia-Pacific region, the West in the 30s - the beginning of the 40s - has been drawing almost one line: without putting up adequate resistance to the aggressors, push them away from the USSR. And later by all means and forces to try to restore colonial rule in Southeast Asia. These plans and wars were caused, firstly, by the region’s strategic role in supplying various raw materials (oil, manganese, rubber, precious metals and stones, non-ferrous metal ores, tropical wood) to the metropolis, and secondly, the most convenient sea routes they intersect precisely in this region, which is also the “soft underbelly” of China.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    11 September 2016 12: 53
    Especially nothing to add .. Thank you ...
  2. +5
    11 September 2016 13: 07
    It is noteworthy that the Western armed forces almost did not oppose Japanese aggression in Southeast Asia (with the exception of units of the US Army in some areas of the Philippines). Say, the British Singapore and Hong Kong were surrendered to the Japanese without resistance.

    No less remarkable is that six months before Minsk was surrendered without a fight, at the very beginning the German advance was disastrous, 50 km a day, they were slowed down only near Kiev and Smolensk.
    Marshal Kulik suggested that his headquarters throw documents, tear off their buttonholes and run away. Read the memoirs of Rokosovsky, Baghramyan, Boldyrev ...
    The USSR and China, of course, helped the peoples of the region in their struggle against the colonialists.

    What is so modest then. Just one line. Here you can write 10 sheets in small handwriting.
  3. +5
    11 September 2016 13: 21
    Quote: Hupfri
    It is noteworthy that the Western armed forces almost did not oppose Japanese aggression in Southeast Asia (with the exception of units of the US Army in some areas of the Philippines). Say, the British Singapore and Hong Kong were surrendered to the Japanese without resistance.

    No less remarkable is that six months before Minsk was surrendered without a fight, at the very beginning the German advance was disastrous, 50 km a day, they were slowed down only near Kiev and Smolensk.
    Marshal Kulik suggested that his headquarters throw documents, tear off their buttonholes and run away. Read the memoirs of Rokosovsky, Baghramyan, Boldyrev ...
    The USSR and China, of course, helped the peoples of the region in their struggle against the colonialists.

    What is so modest then. Just one line. Here you can write 10 sheets in small handwriting.

    Yes, it’s exactly the same thing ... You read Churchill, who sent the battleships for the defense of Singapore, and then was dumbfounded when he learned about his surrender and the death of the battleships.
    And what about Here you can write 10 sheets in small handwriting, I look forward to your ten (however, I do not insist on quantity) sheets on this topic.
    1. 0
      11 September 2016 18: 35
      You read Churchill, who sent the battleships for the defense of Singapore, and then was dumbfounded after learning about his surrender and the death of the battleships.

      Churchill was surprised in vain. Singapore, like Sevastopol, had the most powerful fortifications from the sea. The Japanese approached from the rear, from the coast, cutting off the sources of water supply. No water, no war. Hot.
      But as far as assistance to developing countries is concerned, the USSR saw this as an excuse for its existence, because the ideas of Marxism in impoverished colonies blossomed with magnificent colors. Korea and China, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Zaire, Angola, Mozambique .... Everywhere we taught, gave money, helped with weapons ...
  4. +1
    11 September 2016 14: 07
    the defeat of the Kwantung Army certainly gave a strong impetus ....... but the metropolis did not want to lose the colony and again bloodshed ......... well, it’s not war with the rebels against the Japanese ......
    1. 0
      11 September 2016 15: 29
      Quote: Volga Cossack
      Well, with the rebels, this is not to fight the Japanese .....

      Well, this is how to say it. Partisans were sometimes worse than the Japanese, and most importantly, they fought well in the jungle.
  5. +1
    11 September 2016 18: 24
    Why didn’t Japan become the Empire as she wanted?
    Yes, because stupid people (s) (S.V. Lavrov)
    1) By pursuing a policy of terror and scorched earth, it is difficult to achieve recognition of the local population (or it must be annihilated to zero (mind you, then it was possible. It’s all mobile phones now), but how then to keep the territory?).
    2) Not the development of its industry at the expense of the occupied territories, but its concentration in the metropolis.
    3) Stagnation in development. Seriously. Even looking at the famous WTO, it’s not clear who and where the developers developed sucked the Japanese branch tanks from (I’m sorry for the players, I haven’t been playing it for two years now and only occasionally look at the news). Comparable in terms of performance characteristics, even with the Yankees, the Yapi did not even have serial tanks.
    But in general, knowing not by hearsay the Azites, the main thing is to save face. "We haven't merged until now" - that's what the Japs song looks like.
    P.S. And, yes, under the inscription, If the global ass starts and the Yapes attack, they will appeal to the absence of a peace treaty for twenty rubles.
    Well, seriously - A little more than 100 pieces were released from medium tanks ... You can just keep silent about other weapons. Yes, the Japanese Zero fighter was gaining fame. But still, the accelerated development of technology left him deep and far. I’m not talking about the fleet (because I don’t know).
    Japan's loss was predetermined.
    1. 0
      13 September 2016 16: 14
      Quote: ShadowCat
      Japan's loss was predetermined.

      war has long turned into a competition for the economy. So Japan lost even before attacking PX. This is something from the category — if you are weak — attack first and strike in the heart. But the US’s heart is not there. And they outplayed in a long time.
      Losing Japan was the choice. In WW1, they successfully selected them in the RNE, and then became the strongest in Asia and wanted more.
      And HERE is purely for gameplay. Soon all the fantasies will go.
  6. 0
    11 September 2016 18: 28
    Without the participation of the USSR, the Americans would have waged a war with Japan until the beginning of the 50s, this was repeatedly acknowledged by the representatives of the committee of the US chief of staff. Article "+".
  7. 0
    11 September 2016 20: 12
    how without resistance? these nodal bases of southeast asia the British were supposed to be a support against Japanese aggression but ... it was precisely the perfect underestimation of the enemy in their strength in their preparation and determination to bring the matter to the end that the British summed up the same disgusting leadership by defensive actions predicted a fall such base support like Singapore .. Hong Kong in place of the expected ability to hold the defense in 2 months fell in 18 days .. Japanese lost about 3000 killed and wounded among the British and their allies the entire garrison of 15000 including prisoners .. Singapore was already very shamefully surrendered the garrison city capitulated by more than twice the Japanese group .. Japanese lost about 5000 killed and wounded. Angles and Australians only captured 80000. symbolic but still resistance was ... the author had to be more attentive
    1. 0
      13 September 2016 16: 30
      blame yourself. From 1904 they were trained. Then they improved the experience of taking the coastal cities of garrisons. Tea is not Port Arthur's all. The environment could not stand. Designed for fleet advantage and coastal defense.
      Quote: polkovnik manuch
      Without the participation of the USSR, Americans would have waged war with Japan until the beginning of the 50s

      I can’t say this - but 2 years and big losses when landing on the Japanese islands themselves, yes. They could be up to 50 unless raided without landing. In the style of Tokyo / Dresden / Hamburg. Before surrender.
      With the entry of the USSR into the rear-war for Japan, it ceased to be the rear. IIA was surrounded and waged war on almost the whole world (the strongest countries). Little hope for a separate world with unacceptable losses - collapsed.
      I would not overestimate the feat of the USSR. (But also underestimate) Yes, the Kwantung army was defeated. But the SA was the most powerful army with the best experience in warfare. The grandmaster sat down to play with the newcomer and, of course, won. But to get stuck about the victory over the KA-key to victory over Japan is generally incorrect. Japan lost even before the war (choosing the wrong side) Midway happened at sea, on the land (islands) its Okinawa, and a logical loss in Manchuria. The world pressed Japan back to its islands.
  8. 0
    27 July 2017 10: 47
    There are great doubts about Churchill's quote. The author where the firewood?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"