Pentagon: "The Iranian military acted unsafe and unprofessional"

41
The US military reports the incident in the Strait of Hormuz, which occurred last Tuesday. The point is that two Iranian patrol boats approached "at an unsafe distance to the US Navy warship." This is an interpretation of Washington. The summary states that the “insecure distance” is about 275 meters.

Pentagon: "The Iranian military acted unsafe and unprofessional"




The Pentagon used the familiar stamp, declaring that the actions of the Iranian coast guard were "unsafe and unprofessional." That is, Washington’s use of its warships a few nautical miles from the Iranian coastline is “not dangerous and professional,” and the work of the Iranian Navy in its waters for Washington suddenly turns into danger. If "dangerous", then who invited "to surf the oceans"? - Sit at home ...

After the first statements by the Pentagon press service about what happened in the Strait of Hormuz, new information also appeared. According to this information, it turned out that there were not four, but already four Iranian boats.

At such a pace, it may turn out that the American ship was completely “surrounded by a grouping of Iranian boats, but managed to heroically break through the encirclement and continue sowing democracy in the world's oceans.”
  • IRNA
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    25 August 2016 07: 49
    I read the headline and immediately thought that the Americans were captured again!
    1. +8
      25 August 2016 08: 00
      If only the Iranians would have acted unprofessionally, they would have sunk to ... dogs this trough!
      1. +2
        25 August 2016 08: 29
        The Iranians must now say: "We are not to blame, he came himself ..." negative
      2. +4
        25 August 2016 08: 53
        For demagogy, the ranks of the Pentagon must be given the highest mark. All but the exceptional in the world are acting "unprofessional and dangerous."
    2. +1
      25 August 2016 08: 16
      Barkas, thank you, had fun in the morning)))) It was necessary to write to the media that the Iranians were at meldonia).
      1. +3
        25 August 2016 09: 58
        Of course in meldonia! After all, only under doping can these inflatable junks be dangerous for the destroyer ... But just what kind of doping do the US Navy take if they are so afraid of 2x (well, let 4x) inflatable PS? Or is a provocation planned to justify the invasion? Well then, there should be a crew of blacks and the destroyer had to be blown up. They already have experience ... African Americans should seriously and meticulously calculate the percentage of blacks on board! And then suddenly a couple of Papuans pie drown them lol
        1. +1
          26 August 2016 12: 44
          You are wrong, considering that the recent years have been happening in the world in the sphere of terrorism, bearing in mind that even small children can be suicide bombers, Americans tend to see danger in any object not hung with US flags.
          High-speed light (even inflatable) boats loaded with explosives can be easily turned into a mortal danger for individual US warships, so the "brave bearers of democracy" are so nervous about anything that does not fit into their idea of ​​life in other parts of the world.
  2. +11
    25 August 2016 07: 51
    How did you get these exceptional ones when the US "twine" would burst with a bang? , everywhere they interfere.
    1. +1
      25 August 2016 08: 46
      Well, if the number of Iranian boats continues to increase exponentially, then pretty soon.
  3. +2
    25 August 2016 07: 54
    In addition to the poor folly multiplied by the limited English, compared with the Great and the Mighty, there is much to explain. Even I will not rant about this topic, it is wiped to holes. Nauseous ...
  4. +6
    25 August 2016 07: 56
    Is it very safe and very professional to cross the course of a Russian watchdog with a destroyer at a distance of 200 meters? Here it is safe to be captured by the Iranians, verified ...))))
  5. +14
    25 August 2016 07: 56
    The United States believes that its navy is subject to the same rules as merchant shipping. In general, it’s a strange habit to climb in other people's territorial waters and then indicate how the local border service should act.
  6. +5
    25 August 2016 07: 58
    Clear peppers are unprofessional. It was necessary to drown this trough of Amerovsky, and not to lisp! Joke. It was possible to mock him somehow and in a different way.
  7. +6
    25 August 2016 08: 00
    The ignoramuses gathered around a powerful and professional American army! So what if 3 Hamers were defeated while landing on exercises ... laughing
    1. +8
      25 August 2016 10: 53
      This is what you said with high quality, applause.
      Goblin with these Hammers, I liked more how after the "night of three eights" they tried to demand their reconnaissance vehicles back, which the guys with the tricolor captured. They've already killed everyone with their conceit
  8. +2
    25 August 2016 08: 03
    Disgraces, boats were scared. We would have had our missile, still back and forth, we could have understood. Disgraces are shorter.
    1. +6
      25 August 2016 10: 04
      Shame, the boats were scared.

      They have some complexes connected with boats.
      1. +2
        25 August 2016 12: 08
        Clearly then raped in Yemen good
  9. +1
    25 August 2016 08: 03
    "Continued to sow democracy"
  10. +5
    25 August 2016 08: 07
    Either they were intercepted not professionally, now whether you drive boats didn’t come up professionally, but the professionals themselves are bad, they almost made a plane crash, a reconnaissance plane with an airliner is like, damn it, sometimes you really want to scratch your arms over this extraordinary one.
  11. +16
    25 August 2016 08: 13

    "that there were not two Iranian boats, but four." lol
  12. +1
    25 August 2016 08: 13
    They are all unsafe!
    Where is the evidence? Where are the wet pants of the brave crew of the warship?
  13. +10
    25 August 2016 08: 15
    I can imagine if the Germans at Stalingrad called the actions of the Red Army troops "unprofessional" and "dangerous". Probably, they would have surrendered even earlier. And what, you have to fight according to the rules. American. Iranians, of course, must surrender to the exceptional ...
  14. +1
    25 August 2016 08: 33
    Now Iranians have started trolling the United States
  15. +2
    25 August 2016 08: 38
    Well, no matter how very professional. Anal - some pair of cable
    And ours is so wildly barbaric. Just a little - right on board. And still fighters in three tens of meters with a roar sweep.
  16. +1
    25 August 2016 09: 02
    "Iranian military acted in an unsafe and unprofessional manner"

    It is time for the Americans to change the wording that they use for everyone in whose territorial (or neutral) waters (airspace) are. They roam where they want, they spy as they want, they strike as they want. But if someone even makes an attempt to protect their space at once - it is unsafe and unprofessional. Completely lost both moral and diplomatic guidelines.
  17. cap
    +1
    25 August 2016 09: 37
    Quote: Dazdranagon
    The ignoramuses gathered around a powerful and professional American army! So what if 3 Hamers were defeated while landing on exercises ... laughing


    For those who did not have time to see.
  18. +6
    25 August 2016 09: 44
    After "Cole" the Americans and "are blowing on the water ...."
  19. +1
    25 August 2016 09: 49
    It is unsafe and unprofessional to climb into someone else's territory with your own "orders".
    two Iranian patrol boats approached "an unsafe distance to the US Navy warship".

    This American ship swam (it swam) at an unsafe distance to Iran.
    1. 0
      25 August 2016 11: 31
      They always (God forbid forever) swim like ...
      Go to sea
  20. +1
    25 August 2016 10: 31
    the American ship was completely "surrounded by a group of Iranian boats, but managed to heroically break through the environment

    Yes, she likes to whine for any reason! The danger from boats is something! Moreover, they did not conduct any military operations! And if they would have snapped a torpedo or two ... much less boats, judging by the media, were in their waters. Could and bang!
  21. +1
    25 August 2016 10: 35
    According to this information, it turned out that there were not two Iranian boats, but already four.


    "Three tape recorders, three foreign movie cameras, three domestic cigarette cases, a suede jacket ... three jackets ..." laughing
    Sorry for the replay, but no more words were found.
    was "surrounded by a group of Iranian boats, but managed to heroically break through the environment and continue to sow democracy in the oceans."
    author handsome good
  22. 0
    25 August 2016 10: 50
    Quote: BARKAS
    I read the headline and immediately thought that the Americans were captured again!

    If you had, then the State Department would have scratched turnips, obviously 400 lemons would not have cost.
  23. 0
    25 August 2016 11: 20
    The Americans have generally lost their fear. Perhaps it's time to "teach" the outlaws. angry
  24. 0
    25 August 2016 12: 08
    Well, once declared "unsafe and unprofessional", then again I had to change my pants.
    1. +1
      25 August 2016 12: 37
      US sailors are simply afraid that the Iranians will seize them again and make them apologize smile
  25. +1
    25 August 2016 12: 43
    Quote: BARKAS
    I read the headline and immediately thought that the Americans were captured again!

    That's actually what was there:
  26. 0
    25 August 2016 18: 40
    It is a pity that the route was not mined ...
  27. +1
    25 August 2016 18: 51
    When they are scared, the actions of the foreign military are always "unprofessional."
  28. 0
    26 August 2016 10: 31
    The more there are such "non-professionals" in the world in relation to "sga", the more peaceful the world is!
  29. 0
    26 August 2016 23: 02
    Quote: One of You
    You are wrong, considering that the recent years have been happening in the world in the sphere of terrorism, bearing in mind that even small children can be suicide bombers, Americans tend to see danger in any object not hung with US flags.

    Maybe then you should not swim so far from your native coast?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"