Taliban add to friends

13
History about how the world community on what the world stands stigmatizing representatives of the movement "Taliban", apparently, becomes history. It is being replaced by new trends, according to which the Taliban have suddenly become a very attractive political force for dialogue for many regional and global players.



If not so long ago, each Taliban was seen as nothing more than the embodiment of world terrorism, threatening the progressive development of society and democratic principles, with which it is impossible to talk about any peaceful contacts whatsoever, now the views of many have changed literally beyond recognition. This transformation is associated with the phased withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan. Realizing that sooner or later the United States will be forced to pack up and leave the "hospitable" Afghan provinces, leaders of a number of states suddenly decided to find points of contact with the movement, which they recently called radical extremist. An amazing trend emerged when Iran, and Pakistan, and Turkey, and the countries of the Arabian Peninsula, and the United States themselves are ready to put their values, so to speak, on the altar of friendship with Mohammed Omar, including the fight against world terrorism. True, to call the same Pakistan an active advocate of anti-terrorism values, the language does not turn, but this is not the case. It turns out that when the moment X arrives, suddenly the principles of morality and philanthropy are suddenly inferior to the banal policy of preserving their positions on a regional scale.

Some states even managed to declare that they were not averse to opening on their territory representative offices of the Taliban movement, which can be regarded as a complete disregard of the existing Afghan authorities. Although is it possible to speak about the objective existence of the real Afghan authorities, when Hamid Karzai himself is increasingly beginning to declare that it is time to begin an active dialogue with the Taliban.

Already, the Taliban opened their own representation in Qatar, which has always been considered particularly loyal to the United States. The very fact of the opening of this representative office by a terrorist organization says that the Americans are not against handshaking with those with whom they fought during the last few years 10. In this regard, the Afghan campaign itself of the American troops looks no more than a multi-year farce, in which tens of thousands of people died.

The unexpected warm feelings that have arisen for the Taliban are explained quite simply. For obvious reasons, as soon as the last American soldier leaves Afghanistan, the territory of this state will again be taken under control by the Taliban. Karzai, who officially supported the opening of the Taliban representation in Qatar, has shown that in the future he is counting on leniency on the part of Mohammed Omar and his many legions. We can see a classic example of how Eastern politics are going, which is a very interesting substance, taking the form of the vessel in which the politician is located. Karzai himself, during the active phase of the operation of the American troops who acted as an implacable fighter against extremists, saw changes in the situation and immediately decided to show that his struggle was dictated solely by pressure from outside. And besides, Karzai demonstrated that he himself, he says, always considered the Taliban to be full-fledged citizens of Afghanistan, who have the opportunity to express their point of view even with the help of gunfire and explosions in the areas of Kabul and Kandahar.

Today it is also beneficial for the Taliban to show themselves as a fairly active political force, ready for a full-fledged productive dialogue with the world community. This is reflected in the fact that today Taliban emissaries are quite actively mastering discussion platforms in many Asian countries. In addition, the electronic media, which are controlled by the Taliban, decided to organize a real positive PR for those who had recently positioned themselves as fighters for the faith. Numerous notes that the Taliban are now exclusively pragmatic and humane, literally flooded with newspaper pages, and not only in Afghanistan itself. The Taliban, having emerged from the shadows, as the movement claims to itself, wants to turn into a full-fledged regional force, which, obviously, will ascend to the political Olympus after the actual flight of Americans from Afghanistan.

But is it worth believing Mohammed Omar in his attempts to convince the world community that the Taliban are ready for a productive dialogue after the massacres, reprisals against those who profess a different religion, the explosions of Buddhist statues, and the organization of executions at the stadiums of Afghan cities. Certainly not!

However, today the Taliban have new trump cards. In the eyes of like-minded people, they now look like those who for a number of years have been subjected to endless strikes by the Western coalition, but have managed to survive - real fighters for Islamic values. This factor can be decisive for the new Taliban bonuses.

At present, even Shiite Iran is in favor of establishing a constructive dialogue with the Taliban. And the Turkish authorities are actively negotiating with the Taliban, securing support for the future.

All this reminds how those who inflicted wounds to this beast, and those who stayed aside for the time being, try to feed them from their own saucer to the injured beast, which will soon stand on all four paws, and they are trying to feed them from their own saucer: blood brother

For natural reasons, seeing this state of affairs, the Taliban may begin to choose those with whom it will be more advantageous to cooperate at first. Specialists are inclined to see the large-scale integration of the Taliban and the Pakistani authorities, since it is Pakistan that today appears to be the most active state among the former US allies, which strongly criticize American actions in this region. Therefore, it can be said that the Taliban leaders can gain unambiguous support for Islamabad, just like Islamabad itself - with the support of Mohammed Omar. After all, to be friends against the enemy is much easier and more effective than to be friends just like that.

Against this background, the Americans are doing everything to cajole the Taliban, and to show the world that it was they (the United States) who forced the Taliban to come out of the gloom. It is possible that in the near future we will even hear statements that the American military operation in Afghanistan was the most successful of all the operations carried out in the style of “Real Freedom” or “Democratization of the Desert”, because allegedly the Americans managed to democratize the Taliban themselves with lobster.

In general, it is necessary to state the main thing - for the loyalty of the Taliban, today there is a serious campaign, and the great opium power at the side of Russia has remained, as always and always, undefeated.

Again, we are preparing to strengthen the southern frontiers ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. dimaas
    +1
    10 January 2012 08: 31
    Here on this issue I am ready to fully identify with the anti-Pindos. Thank God, at least we had the mind not to climb into this hornet's nest with the armed forces.
    1. +6
      10 January 2012 09: 01
      I want to correct you, we are not anti-pendosniki, but we are healthy people. We are not against the United States as a whole, we are against the actions of the government and their elites who crave power around the world. As for ordinary citizens, I feel sorry for them, whatever they do, they cannot influence their governments. 1% controls the whole country. Real hell in heavenly upholstery.
  2. Lech e-mine
    +2
    10 January 2012 08: 52
    ha-hell radish is sweet. Now, in addition to the fighters for democracy around the world (USA), there will also be fighters for pure ISLAM. (AGAINST THE FAITHFUL). And how they, under the cries of ALLAH AKBAR, cut the infidels, we all saw (a continuous horror film).
    1. dimaas
      +3
      10 January 2012 09: 12
      So and I about the same. Thanks to America, small-town gangs are indeed becoming the backbone of world-wide militant Islam. And if earlier the region’s poverty was a limiting factor, now real money has come there both from the West and from the Islamic states.
    2. +2
      10 January 2012 15: 40
      I personally met with the residents of Afgan. They all complain about the "Taliban", they say that these scum rape, rob and kill and it is not possible to resist them. they are well armed (the Pindos did their best, and for a diversion they supply Soviet-style weapons such as Makarov, AK-74, RPG, etc.). These are just non-humans, or as we call the Barbarians !!! And religion is so ... to divert the eyes, like they are "righteous", etc. to pull people up ...
      By the way, they pay well, dollars fellow and from nefig do people go there, earn a living ...
  3. +7
    10 January 2012 11: 20
    The Taliban itself has acquired a number of myths and persistent ideas, some of which can be seen in this article.
    Myth 1. The Taliban is a group of religious fanatics that cannot be pacified through negotiations. All societies have irreconcilable extremists, but they usually represent a small minority. Many groups in the Taliban have already shown their willingness to negotiate. They can be lured to their side, transferring part of the political power, more autonomy and outlining the prospects for economic benefits. The Taliban is not a single movement, but a label that is stuck on every armed group or militant who is not necessarily carried away by the fundamentalist ideology of the famous Taliban leaders. This organization includes tribal leaders, militia leaders and field commanders, many of whom (including the Haqqani and Hekmatyar organizations) are a living legacy of the struggle against the Soviet troops, who were once cherished and cherished by the same UWB
    Myth 2. There is no significant difference between the Taliban and Al Qaeda. They are part of a growing alliance of religious extremists who hate America and must be defeated at all costs. Al Qaeda and the Taliban are not the same thing, they have many differences and contentious issues. The Taliban is a coalition of military-political and tribal organizations that seek power in Afghanistan. Al Qaeda is an international terrorist network seeking to end Western influence in the Middle East and overthrow existing Arab governments. Only al-Qaeda directly threatens the United States., Which they themselves spawned to justify their aggressive policies in the Islamic world.
    Myth 3. The United States will leave Afghanistan, the Taliban will seize power, Al-Qaeda will again regain its position in the country, which threatens with new deadly attacks in America. In fact, the Taliban are unpopular in most of Afghanistan, and it is unlikely that they can seize power in country. They can get the upper hand in some areas, but al-Qaeda will not be able to restore its bases there, because the US is now able to detect and destroy them with the help of aviation and special forces. Moreover, the American massive military presence could lead to the fact that the terrorist threat to the US territory itself will increase.

    To win the war with the armed people is virtually impossible
    The conflict in Afghanistan is usually seen as a struggle between the Karzai government and the rebel Taliban movement, which, in alliance with international terrorists, seeks to overthrow this government. In fact, the conflict is a civil war, the struggle for the distribution of power and is partly ethnic in nature - Pashtuns who dominate in the south, fight with other ethnic groups such as the Tajiks and Uzbeks who predominate in the north of the country. Conflict between town and country, in particular among Pashtuns, as well as religious differences, are imprinted on the conflict.
  4. mar.tira
    +1
    10 January 2012 11: 40
    Yeah! As with Gaddafi! The Americans themselves admitted that they first euthanized his vigilance, that he would relax, and then deal a blow. The principle of their policy does not continue to be washed so much. It’s their essence to be double-faced.
  5. PIRATE
    +3
    10 January 2012 12: 06
    Yes, the Taliban is such an infection that you pick it out, but on the other hand, if they again take control of Afghanistan, then less drugs will come to us, and this is gut ... the main thing is that they do not come to us.
    1. alatau_09
      +1
      10 January 2012 15: 59
      Afghan for amers is also important as a producer of opium, as a means of obtaining a lot of money and decomposition of society in Eurasia, thereby killing "two birds with one stone":
      - military presence in the region,
      - a drug business to subsidize its operations, / remember the 80s Iran-Contra scandal, when the CIA was caught dealing with cocaine /,
      - the destruction of youth, that is, the future, the growth of social tension in countries unacceptable to amers through drugs ...
      1. 0
        11 January 2012 17: 31
        wiki / Taliban
        Joining the UNODC program for the destruction of opium poppy crops and alternative agricultural development in July 2000, Imam Omar banned the cultivation of opium poppy in Afghanistan. The consequence was the almost complete eradication of opium poppy in Afghanistan: in 2001, only 185 tons of opium were produced.
        From 1989 to 1992 (the reign of Najibullah), opium production increased from 1200 tons to 1970 tons,
        From 1992 to 1996 (the reign of the Mujahideen) opium production increased from 1970 tons to 2200 tons,
        1996 to 2000 (most of the reign the Talibana) opium production remained at 2200 tons, but in 2001 dropped to xnumx tons,
        2001 to 2009 (presence period of american troops) opium production increased from 185 tons to 6900 tons.
  6. dred
    -2
    10 January 2012 12: 43
    I don’t understand why then fight for 10 years?
    1. Gekas
      +2
      11 January 2012 16: 55
      Drug trafficking is the main goal, also a military presence in the region. After all, the land border with Iran.
  7. 755962
    0
    10 January 2012 15: 19
    It doesn’t matter what means the goal is achieved. It doesn’t work on the one hand, you can go from the rear.
  8. -1
    10 January 2012 16: 41
    The Yankees and Pakistan messed up, and now they are trying to get out of Afghanistan without losing .. face .. like an anecdote - the wall collapsed at exactly the right time
  9. 0
    10 January 2012 21: 15
    But what about the screams of Clintons? She was so killed, proving that the Taliban is a terrorist organization! Next come assurances of love? Taliban and America are brothers forever !!! Flirting with the Taliban can have a bad effect on the United States itself, unless they try to incite Iran or anyone else. The Taliban understand the US’s weakness and if they can’t negotiate with them and they try to play their part .. ................ maybe the Pindos will have to flee Afghanistan !!!!
  10. polukazak1
    0
    11 January 2012 00: 13
    Regarding the fact that the Taliban is not a religious or extremist movement, it’s a secular-humanistic movement. Having seized power over the country, the first thing is a burqa for women, a ban on medical care, girls’s studies, a Sharia court with stoning, an explosion of the unesco Buddha statue carved into I will not continue, fanatics leading the country in the Middle Ages
  11. 0
    11 January 2012 11: 13
    Attention! You do not have permission to view hidden text.

    delayed double standards, exactly according to J. Orwell, there were few Pindos flirting with al-Qaeda and the consequences?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"