The first information war. Legends of the "wild hordes of Muscovites of Tsar John the Terrible"

65
Liberals against the monument to the Terrible Tsar

The first information war. Legends of the "wild hordes of Muscovites of Tsar John the Terrible"




Today, the level of confrontation between Russia and our so-called. "Western partners" in the opinion of many experts recalls the times of the fiercest confrontation between the USSR and the West during the years of the "cold war".

In the West, the image of a huge aggressive Russia is re-forming, which looms over small and defenseless European countries, intending to invade the Russians tank armada, trample the centers of civilization and democracy on the European continent. And at the head of this dark and totalitarian country is Putin, a ruthless and cruel dictator. Coming from the ominous KGB, Putin in his medieval Kremlin is hatching plans to restore either the USSR or the Russian Empire, i.e. a terrible "prison of peoples" in which freedom-loving Latvians and Georgians, Ukrainians and residents of some "Idel-Ural" and "Cossacks" suffered under the yoke of "Russian barbarians". Information warfare is the most important part of the so-called. "Hybrid war", which our "sworn friends" are waging against Russia. And one of the most important areas of information confrontation is the battle for history. It is well known that those who teach history to the younger generation shape the future of the country. In total, over the 23 of the year in Ukraine, with the help of the textbooks of the “benefactor and philanthropist” Soros, they artificially created a generation of people firmly convinced that a certain “Moskovia” populated by a mixture of Finno-Ugric and Mongols oppressed the unfortunate Ukraine-Russia for centuries by forcibly otgorit ancient Ukrainian people ”from the fraternal family of“ civilized European nations ”. Unfortunately, the work on the distortion of Russian history did not begin with the textbooks of Soros. Karamzin in the ninth volume of his “History” consciously relied only on the testimony of “General Vlasov of the sixteenth century” traitor Kurbsky, on the testimony of the Jesuit Pope's envoy Antonio Possevino, on the testimony of the German adventurer Heinrich Stadena and others “friends” of Russia. In Russian society, liberal historians diligently tried to consolidate the image of Tsar Ivan Vasilyevich the Terrible as a “bloody tyrant” and “monster on the throne”. Nowadays, Radzinsky, Lungin and other “media people” from the liberal camp work tirelessly to reinforce the lies and slander of foreigners about the first Russian Tsar.

27 August in Orel, a monument to Tsar Ivan Vasilyevich the Terrible. 450 years ago, the Terrible King founded the glorious city of Eagle. In total, 155 cities were built, 60 monasteries were founded, the Kazan and Astrakhan khanates were built, Siberia was annexed, the territory of the Russian state doubled, military and judicial reforms were carried out, the first regular army was established, Zemsky Sobor was established and Zemsky Sobor was established . But despite this, the decision of the inhabitants of the Eagle to erect a monument to Sovereign John the Terrible caused a hysterical reaction of the liberal public throughout the country.

It would seem that, against the background of the most powerful anti-Russian information campaigns launched in the media controlled by the “world international usurers”, one can ignore the protests of Russian liberals against the monument to Tsar Ivan Vasilyevich the Terrible. But, curiously, it was during the reign of the Terrible Tsar in the West that the first information war against Russia was launched. And then in all information campaigns against the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union throughout the centuries Russophobic myths invented during this first information war of the 16th century methodically repeated. During the years of the Livonian War, Europeans first began to be intimidated by the invasion of the wild hordes of “Russian barbarians”, economic sanctions against Muscovite Russia were introduced, in modern terms, an “embargo on access to high technologies” was announced. Times change, instead of Gutenberg's printing press, digital technologies and the World Wide Web are used, and myths and legends about the “hordes of Russian barbarians” threatening a peaceful Europe, about the grim “evil empire” led by the “cruel tyrant” remain the same.

The cynicism of Western politicians and fighters of the "information front" knows no limit. “Maidan” in Kiev, where the soldiers of the “Golden Eagle” were burned with “Molotov cocktails” and shot by snipers, were declared by our “Western partners” “peaceful democratic will of the people”. The monsters who cut off the heads of children and women in the United States are called "democratic Syrian opposition." We see how our “Western partners” stubbornly fail to notice the burning of people in Odessa, the OSCE observers stubbornly “do not see”, and for two years the punishers of the Kiev junta methodically smash up the Donbas cities with heavy guns, killing hundreds of civilians - women, children, old men. Talking about "double standards" is already indecent - it is the same as reproaching Dr. Goebbels, because in his speeches on Berlin radio he deceived the population of the Third Reich. This is a real war being waged with our country. And the historical experience convinces that the cries of “Russian aggression” are heard especially fiercely at the time when “civilized Europe” is preparing another invasion of “barbarous Russia”.

About how the "Russian barbarians" attacked the peaceful "Georgia"

For the first time, many of our compatriots are confronted with the fact that it is possible to lie frankly and shamelessly, calling black white, in 2008 year. After the war 08. 08.08 The latest illusions that free and independent media exist in the West have been scattered like smoke. In August, 2008, we all could see what methods the information war is waged with Russia.

On the night of August 8 Georgia treacherously attacked South Ossetia. By order of Georgian President Saakashvili, the Georgian army used heavy artillery and multiple launch rocket systems “Grad” to demolish the sleeping Tskhinval, Georgian soldiers, along with foreign mercenaries, mercilessly and methodically killed civilians, old people, women and children. The Georgian army launched heavy fire on the Russian peacekeepers, who carried out their mission in South Ossetia under a UN mandate. Hundreds of civilians died, and Russian peacekeepers died in the line of duty. These days, all European TV companies continuously showed footage of burning Tskhinval. But viewers were told that the screen was not the dying capital of South Ossetia, but the Georgian city of Gori, which Russian troops barbarously destroy. Weeks in all Western media indignantly told how the Russian aggressors of August 8 insidiously attacked peaceful Georgia.

It took quite a bit of time and in Hollywood they quickly invented a feature film about how the armadas of Russian tanks and hordes of Russian soldiers in August 2008, invaded the Georgian land. On the screen, bloodthirsty Russians ruthlessly exterminate peaceful villagers, shoot happy newlyweds and guests at merry Georgian weddings. Brave American journalists, of course, risking their lives, remove the Russian atrocities. Scary thugs from a Russian Sonderkommando, led by a fierce Cossack mercenary, hunt for reporters, wanting to kill witnesses to the crime. But courageous American reporters save the film that captures Russian atrocities in order to tell the whole world the truth about Russian aggression. At the last minute, heroic Georgian special forces, with whom they once defended democracy in Iraq, rescue Americans from the terrible "Cossack". The film was shot by the author of the famous militants “Die Hard 2” and “Rock Climber”, while the noble President of Georgia Mikhail Saakashvili was portrayed by Hollywood star Andy Garcia.

The Russian army in 2008 for five days completely crushed and dispersed gangs of Georgians and foreign mercenaries dressed in NATO camouflage. A Russian soldier saved the people of South Ossetia from extermination. Recall that the operation of the Georgian army to “clean up” South Ossetia from the population was called “Clean Field”. After driving home the remnants of the 30-thousandth Georgian army, which the United States and the NATO countries diligently trained and armed for five years, the units of the Russian army left the territory of Georgia, which they entered in pursuit of a defeated aggressor. The Russian army, under a UN mandate, carried out a peacekeeping mission in South Ossetia. Russia fulfilled its obligations to the international community, forcing the aggressor to peace. Russia provided irrefutable evidence of the treacherous attack of Georgia on South Ossetia, a lot of documentary evidence about how the Georgian army calmly and methodically killed Russian peacekeepers and civilians. The international community was forced to officially recognize Georgia as the aggressor that unleashed the war. Today, no one is trying to dispute this fact.

But the majority of ordinary people in the US and Europe are still sure that not Georgians attacked South Ossetia, and the Russians in August 2008 attacked the little peaceful Georgia in treachery to seize and occupy a free and democratic Caucasian state. In Hollywood, several militants are likely to film on this topic, write adventure novels about how the brave Georgians, with the help of journalists from the USA who happened to be in the Caucasus, successfully repulsed the invasion from the North of the innumerable hordes of Russian barbarians. And after a while this artistic fiction of the “fighters of the information war” will be used as proof of the eternal aggression of Russia against its neighbors. In the West, a man in the street has long been convinced that the vast Russian Empire, and then the USSR, threatened peaceful European countries for centuries. At first Russian tsars with overwhelming hordes of wild Cossacks tried to conquer Europe, then the general secretaries tried to drive everyone into the socialist camp, threatening nuclear weaponsand now sinister Putin, with the help of former KGB agents, the “Russian mafia” and the gas pipe, is threatening European democracy. Therefore, Russia needs to be surrounded by NATO bases and have a missile defense system near the Russian borders. To save "civilized countries" from the eternal Russian aggression.

Recall the story. To save Europe from the “Russian aggressors” in the 1709 year, Karl XII marched on Moscow. The Swedish king proclaimed in his appeals that he was going to free the Russians from the "intolerable tyranny of Tsar Peter." To save Russia from "tyranny" Karl XII was going to divide the Russian lands into several small states with "democratic" boyar rule. In 1812, Napoleon, at the head of an army assembled from all over Europe, marched to Moscow also to save European civilization from the “Russian threat”. And at the same time free the Russian peasants from serfdom. In the 1854 year, in order to fight the “Russian threat,” Anglo-French troops, together with the Turks, landed in the Crimea and laid siege to Sevastopol. In order for Russia not to threaten “European civilization” they intended to separate Ukraine, the Baltic States, the Caucasus, Kamchatka and part of Siberia from the Russian Empire, and cut off the Russians from the Baltic and the Black Sea. In 1941, Hitler also went to Moscow to "save European civilization from the wild Bolshevik hordes."

Recall that the Swedish army of Charles XII was defeated not in the Scandinavian Peninsula, but near Poltava. The hordes of “two languages” gathered by Napoleon from all over Europe burned and plundered Moscow. And only after that, defeating and expelling the enemy from the Russian land, did the Russian Guard march through Paris. German troops stood near Moscow and on the Volga, devastated and gushing our land with blood, and only after that the Russian soldier, breaking the enemy, reached Berlin and hoisted the banner of Victory over the Reichstag. Every century, Russia is undergoing devastating invasions from the West. But despite this, the European man in the street continues to intimidate and frighten the “Russian threat”. The model of the Third Reich Propaganda Ministry, headed by Dr. Josef Goebbels, was a model of anti-Russian lies and slander. It seemed difficult to surpass Goebbels in cynicism and shameless lies. However, we see that in the twenty-first century, the information war against Russia is no less brazen and unscrupulous than during the Great Patriotic War.

But few people know that Goebbels, it turns out, had very skillful predecessors and the first information company against Russia was deployed in the distant XVI century in the reign of Emperor John Vasilyevich the Terrible.

Sovereign John Vasilyevich the Terrible and the "tyrant" John the Terrible

Ionn the Terrible .jpgIt is interesting that in Russia the first Russian Tsar John IV Vasilyevich is called the Terrible. And in the West - John the Terrible. Terrible and Terrible, it seems clear that these words have a different meaning. In Russian history, the princes Dmitry the Terrible Eyes are known. The Great Prince John III Vasilyevich, who finally overthrew the yoke of the Golden Horde, was also called Ivan the Terrible. In the Orthodox Church, the Terrible is called the Archangel Michael. Always the word Grozny in ancient Russian songs and epics means not terrible, but terrible for the enemies of the fatherland and the enemies of God. But, unfortunately, recently in Russia Tsar John IV has been persistently trying to present not the Terrible Sovereign, but the bloodthirsty tyrant John the Terrible. And the beginning of this attitude towards the first Russian Tsar was laid in the nineteenth century among the liberal intelligentsia. Among the Russian liberal intelligentsia, it was fashionable to get involved in the Western way of life, striving for democracy and “progress”, and despising “backward Russia” and “grim autocracy”. Tsar Ivan the Terrible and for them was the embodiment of "Asian despotism" and "royal chains". This view of the reign of the sovereign John IV through the efforts of the liberals became dominant in Russian society. And in the West, the legend of the bloodthirsty tyrant John the Awful became the basis for the myth of the eternal “Russian threat” hanging over peaceful Europe. And terrible tales about the innumerable hordes of "Russian barbarians" who are ready to invade European nations, destroying flowering cities and exterminating the civilian population spread in Europe from the sixteenth century, since the time when the Livonian war broke out in the Baltics.

Knights of the Temple of Solomon on the shores of the Baltic

To understand the causes of the Livonian war, we must turn to the beginning of the thirteenth century, when knights of the Teutonic Order and the Order of the Sword appeared on the lands of the Baltic States. By this time, the last cities of the Baltic Slavs had fallen under the blows of the Germans. The lands on the southern coast of the Baltic Sea from the Elbe to the Oder were occupied by tribes of obedrites, lyutichs, Pomoryan, vagres. Separate tribes of pagan Slavs did not withstand the methodical onslaught of the German Empire. To the aid of the Teutons flocked knights of knights from all over Europe. Following the Catholic missionary monks and knights, merchants and German colonists moved to the Slavic lands. Soon the remnants of the Pomeranian Slavs were completely Germanized. Having conquered the Slavic Pomorie, the German knights with fire and sword moved to conquer the lands of the Prussians lying to the east. At the same time, having landed and entrenched on the eastern shore of the Baltic Sea, the Germans forcibly baptized the ancestors of the Estonians and Latvians. In this case, to know all the subjugated tribes exterminated, the rest turned into slaves. Russians with the Baltic tribes have long traded, with some they took tribute, and lived quite peacefully. But no one was baptized by force. In Estonia, Prince Yaroslav the Wise was founded by the Russian city of Yuriev. Most likely, relations with the Baltic tribes would develop as calmly as with those Finnish and Baltic tribes that gradually became part of Russia - the Korela and Belayozersk Chud, the swaddle and the Meshchery. But that all changed with the appearance of German knights in the Baltics. At the same time, the Russian land was subjected to a terrible Mongol-Tatar invasion. Taking advantage of the weakness of the devastated, defeated and devastated by the Mongol-Tatar hordes of Russian principalities, the western neighbors - Poland, Lithuania, Hungary captured part of the Russian lands. With the blessing of the Pope, the German knights, entrenched during this time in the Baltic States and subdued the tribes of the Estonians, Livs and Latvians, continued their famous “Drang nah Osten” - an attack on the East. With the blessing of the Pope, the Teutons and the Swordsmen united in the Livonian Order. Rome declared a crusade against the “Russian heretics”, raising the Swedes, the Danes and the Germans to the war with Russia. The holy blessed Prince Alexander Nevsky defeated the Swedes on the Neva, the German knights on Lake Peipsi, and for a long time stopped the German "onslaught to the East." But the Livonian Order, firmly entrenched in the Baltic States, has since remained a sworn enemy of Russia.

Moscow princes, collecting Russian lands in a single state, invited European scientists and craftsmen to serve; Russia for two centuries of the Horde yoke in some areas of knowledge seriously lagged behind Western Europe. But not everyone liked the strengthening of Muscovy. The Livonian Order at that time actively participated in what today would have been called an “economic blockade” and an “embargo on the supply of high technologies” to Russia. European scientists and craftsmen who were invited to serve in Moscow, the Livonians detained and imprisoned, did not allow important materials and goods to enter Russia. In addition, Orthodox were cruelly persecuted in the lands of the Order. In 1472, the 6 year of January, when the Orthodox celebrate the Epiphany of the Lord, in the city of Yuryev, which was turned into German Dorpat, during the festive procession, the city authorities seized and imprisoned the priest Isidore and all the parishioners of his church. The community of Orthodox Christians of the city of Yuriev, on pain of death, was ordered to adopt the Latin faith. The Russian people remained loyal to Orthodoxy and on January 8, the priest Isidore and all the 72 people among whom were old men and women, young men, young ladies and babies were drowned in ice holes on the river Omovzhe. The Orthodox Church 8 of January honors the memory of priest Isidore and 72 of the martyrs of Yuryevsk.

In Livonia, Orthodox were treated with particular hatred. Latin Catholics have long feuded with Orthodox Christians. But in Livonia, the Orthodox Russian people were persecuted with special malice and cruelty. Some foreign authors even reported that in the possession of the Order for the murder of the Orthodox pay a reward. This hatred can be explained by linking the Livonian Order with the Order of the Templars. Probably many people remember the ominous image of the templar Briand Boisguillebert from the novel by Walter Scott "Ivanhoe". The Knights of the Temple of Solomon, the Templars (“tampl” - the temple), were known throughout Europe for their usury and banking operations, as well as their predilection for the occult, i.e. magic, magic and sorcery. This is no accident, usually a passion for profit, avarice, and pushes people to such activities. The Knights of the Temple concentrated enormous riches in their hands, even began to mint their own gold coins. In Europe, the templar enjoyed notoriety, believed that the knights of the Temple of Solomon engaged in magic and black magic, and are associated with dark power. And for such allegations there were grounds. Many European sovereigns seriously feared the Templars and the templar knights gradually began to possess enormous power and influence.

It ended with the fact that in France, King Philippe the Beautiful defeated the castles of the French Templars. While the French king ravaged the nests of the templars in France, she left Le Havre in an unknown direction flotilla, which is believed to have taken the Templars' gold. It was in 1334. At that time, in Livonia, the knights of the Orders of the Sword-Bearers and Teutons lived far from luxuriously - it was not possible to take from the poor tribes of Livs, Lats, and Ests, although the knights turned them into slaves (after baptizing them). And, suddenly, in poor Livonia, the construction boom begins that same year - at the same time 34 large stone castles are laid, huge stone cathedrals are built, architects and craftsmen from Europe are invited. And in the land of Livonia, in the treasures of that time, golden ecu, which the Templars minted, appear, as archaeologists have noticed. By the way, the charter of the Order of the Swordsmen was, with the blessing of the pope, completely written off from the charter of the Order of the Templars. It should be noted that creating the image of the gloomy “templar” Brian Boisguillebert in “Aivengo”, the Christian writer Walter Scott did not accidentally describe the knights of the Temple of Solomon as Satanists. In Russia they were called "Solomon". This fascination with the Black Book and sorcery explains the fierce hatred in the lands of Livonia for the Orthodox. Defending Orthodox churches devastated and desecrated by Livonians, Moscow sovereigns John III and Vasily III fought with the Livonian Order. The Livonians were defeated, quieted down, and promised not to persecute the Orthodox and pay tribute to Moscow for owning the captured Russian city of Yuryev. But they continued, as they could, to mislead the Russians. And Tsar John IV Vasilievich also had to fight with Livonia. In 1548, about 100 European specialists were invited to serve in Russia: doctors, masters, architects, scientists. But they could not get to Russia - the Livonians did not allow it. The St. George's tribute, which Derpt was obliged to pay to the Moscow sovereigns, the Livonians did not even think of paying. And by any means they tried to interrupt Russian trade in the Baltic. To tolerate more openly hostile actions of the Livonian Order was impossible. The Russian state needed to ensure free access to the Baltic Sea. It should be noted that Sovereign John Vasilievich tried to solve the matter peacefully and negotiated with the Order. And only after it was not possible to agree, did the Livonian war begin.

“Wild hordes of Muscovites” in Livonia

Russian warriors in the Livonian War .jpg The Livonian Order military forces and the militia of German cities were soon completely defeated. Sworn enemy, treachery and power established in the ancient possessions of the Russian princes in the Baltic States (as remembered by Tsar Ivan Vasilyevich and resembled the Livonians during negotiations, trying to solve the matter peacefully), was defeated and crushed. How did the “Russian barbarians” manage with the defeated enemy? In Europe, works were distributed in which the atrocities of “ferocious Muscovites” were colorfully described. The writers seemed to be competing for who would invent more horrible tortures and executions with which the “Russian barbarians” exterminated the civilians of the Livonian cities. But it is interesting how the matter really was. Here is what the Livonian Chronicle reports about the capture of Dorpat by the Russians - the ancient Russian Yuriev.

Voevoda Petr Ivanovich Shuisky, after signing a short siege and bombing the city after the conditions for the surrender of Dorpat, allowed those who did not want to remain under the authority of the Russian tsar to leave the city along with all the property. “After that, all the burghers and military people, with everything that they could take with them, set off on a journey unwilling to remain in the city. They were accompanied by many boyars and horsemen, and they were not caused the slightest resentment. When they left the city, military leader Prince Peter Shuisky demanded that the magistrate send several burgomasters, ratsgers and elected members of the community to accompany him, the prince, to the city. He, the prince, will first of all send to the city a governor with a few people who will bring the banners of the world, arrange a proper order in everything; burghers, on the other hand, must remain in their homes until a good order is established, and may they not in the least care for themselves.

After that, several persons appointed by the magistrate and the community, as well as several members of the chapter and two persons by the bishop, went to the military head (as deputies) in the camp. The prince graciously received them, gave them his hand, promising the grace of the Grand Duke and his petition for them. "

After the “life-archers” of the tsarist voivode entered the city, Peter Ivanovich Shuisky was a “noble and pious man,” as the chronicle says addressed to the inhabitants and the Russian troops.

“Then the prince ordered to declare that on pain of death no one dares to offend the inhabitants of the city. He also ordered to declare that the burgher people would not sell in their houses any drinks for military men, in the prevention of misfortune. All the Russian warriors were placed in the castle, in the cathedral rooms and in the houses left by the residents, and they were strictly watched so that they would not offend anyone, and who was guilty of this, the prince ordered shamefully beating and punishing him; the prince also appointed several boyars with archers for detours in the city, who drove around every day and took away all the intoxicated people and all those who had only behaved inappropriately, and were immediately imprisoned. Seeing this, the burghers somewhat calmed down in their misfortune, and were not afraid of the already open attack and violence.

After that, the magistrate and the community sent the prince a gift basket with wine, beer and various other supplies, and fresh fish and greens, which was accepted favorably, and he once again announced that if there was any complaint about his military people, then let him speak directly to him: he will be able to punish the guilty and protect any innocent. A few days later, he invited me to visit the magistrate’s castle, the community, the Eltermans and the foremen and well treated them. ” So tells about the behavior of the royal governor and the Russian troops "Livonian Chronicle". And in Europe at this time they distribute leaflets in which they describe the atrocities of the Muscovites with unrestrained imagination, spreading rumors about the wild violence, robberies and murders that Russians are doing in the Baltic States.

But the war, unfortunately, flared up. Poland and Sweden joined the fight for Livonia. The Livonian knights defeated by the tsarist troops decided to continue the struggle against the Russians. And in the 1558 year, when enemy troops approached Dorpat, the chronicle reports the expulsion from the city of Livonians of those capable of raising the uprising:

“Dorpat burghers, and those who were only capable of carrying weapons were sent from the city to Pskov. There they were placed with the Pskov burghers and were not released until the magister departed from Ringen to the Riga diocese; then they were again returned to Derpt to their wives and children, to whom, by the way, in their absence, no offense was caused. ”

“In the 1559 year, when the master camped at Nyggenn again, the Dorpat burghers were not sent anywhere; but they were placed in the town hall, they were sent food from their houses and did not cause any harm. ”

During the hostilities, Livonian leaders, who opposed the Russians, were captured. Those of them who managed to take the oath to the Russian Tsar, and then treacherously attacked the small Russian garrisons, killing the archers, were executed. Executed, we emphasize, as traitors. But the captive master and others were treated graciously. Here is what the chronicle tells. Again, we recall - Livonian Chronicle:

“In this way, the Muscovites, in August 1560 of the year, took Fellin’s strongest castle, the country's best fortress, and took the head of the whole country, the pious old master Wilhelm Fürstenberg to Moscow, and gave him and his servants a castle called Lublin (he loved ) where he subsequently died. ”

It should be noted that the Sovereign summoned Master Fürstenberg after many years, who, as written in Europe together with the rest of the captive Livonians, "was cruelly beaten with iron sticks" and offered to become the head of Livonia, which was conquered by the Russians. But the old master refused. Even the Polish writer Waliszewski reports that while Fürstenberg quietly lived for 20 for years on his estate in Russia, various stories about the death of the master went around Europe. In these fables, there were 15 versions of terrible executions that tortured the Muscovites of the master. Violent fantasy "workers of the information war of the sixteenth century" did not allow them to agree among themselves, how did John the Terrible executed Furstenberg.

The rest of the Livonians, evicted together with their wives and children at the height of the war in Vladimir, Kostroma, Nizhny Novgorod, also, apparently, did not feel any particular oppression. The chronicle reports that: “the pastor, named Master John Vetterman, a man of good and honest nature, a true apostle of the Lord, who also went into exile with them, herded his flock as a righteous shepherd”

A Lutheran priest quietly nourished his flock living in Russia. The pastor traveled to Russian cities in which the Livonians were stationed:

“And every hour he admonished fear of the Lord, and even appointed school teachers for their children, which could then be obtained, which in every town on Sundays they read to children from the Holy Scriptures. As a learned man, he was greatly respected by the Grand Duke, who even ordered in Moscow to show him his Liberty (library), which consisted of books in Hebrew, Greek and Latin, and which the Grand Duke received in ancient times from the Patriarch of Constantinople when Muscovite adopted the Christian faith according to the Greek confession. "

“These books were handed over to Master John Vetterman for inspection. He found many good writings there that are cited by our writers, but which we don’t have, since they were burned and scattered during the wars, as was the case with the Ptolomeic and other Liberians. Vetterman said that, although he was poor, he would give all his property, even all his children, so that only these books were in Protestant universities, since, in his opinion, these books would bring much benefit to Christianity. ”

As we can see, the German Lutheran pastor does not experience any persecutions from “cruel and savage Muscovites”. But he was even honored for his righteousness and the scholarship of the attention and trust of Tsar John Vasilyevich. Well, the messages of the Livonian Chronicle do not converge with the stories spread throughout Europe about the atrocities of the "wild Moscow hordes led by the bloodthirsty tsar." Note that the chronicle was compiled by the Livonians, who were defeated by the Russians. That is why they had no reason to embellish the Russians.

But not only the Livonians were magnanimous to Tsar Ivan Vasilyevich the Terrible, whom in Europe at that time was described as a fierce tyrant, and his troops represented hordes of wild barbarians.

"Bring to Christ with affection and love"

When taking Polotsk in 1563, the sovereign released the entire capitulation of the Polish garrison, generously awarding the soldiers, and granted nobles to the nobles. After the capture of Wolmer in 1578, when the heavy war seemed to end, most of the Livonian cities were taken or surrendered, Tsar Ivan Vasilievich convenes all the noble Polish and Lithuanian prisoners for a victorious feast with the Russian boyars and governors. According to the testimony of the chronicles, the king generously gave them "coats and cups, and he gave others buckets, after which everyone was sent home." The generous and chivalrous act of the Russian Sovereign, which for some reason is not customary to recall.

The capture of Kazan and the conquest of the Kazan Khanate also provide more than one example of the generosity of John Vasilyevich to the defeated enemies. The stubborn and brave enemy of Prince Jadiger, subdued by the magnanimity of the Sovereign, decided to be baptized. Although Tsar John Vasilyevich forbade the giving of privileges to those Tatars who were baptized, the Sovereign wanted the new believers to come to Christ not because of greed, so that there was no reason to be baptized for the sake of earthly gain. But despite this, many Tatars were baptized in the Kazan land under the holy saints Guria and Varsonofy. It is significant that the Sovereign not only did not persecute Muslims, but demanded that they be brought to Christ only by “affection and love”. On the conquered Tatars no one imposed additional burden, compared with the Russian population. And although there were uprisings in the Volga region among the Tatars and Cheremis, these uprisings were severely suppressed, but the wise policy of Tsar Ivan the Terrible led to the fact that in the Time of Troubles, the Kazan Tatars did not want to secede from Russia, but together with the Minin and Pozharsky militia went to liberate Moscow from the Poles. It is interesting to compare the behavior of the Russians in the Kazan Khanate with the attitude of the Turks in the Ottoman Empire to the conquered Christian peoples. Or how the conquerors from Western Europe treated the conquered peoples. And not only the natives in the overseas colonies had to face the cruelty of the European conquerors. Recall how the British ruthlessly and methodically exterminated the Irish.

Old songs in the new version

Despite this, terrible tales about the wild and ferocious Muscovites and the cruel and bloodthirsty tyrant of the Russian Tsar John the Terrible are still spreading in the West. The information war with Russia continues. Nowadays, all the power of anti-Russian propaganda is aimed at creating another myth. In the West, they carefully rewrite the history of the Second World War. The European citizen is convinced that the "wild hordes of Muscovites", in caps with red stars, invaded Germany, forcibly raping and exterminating the civilian population. But the "civilized world" and European culture were saved by the valiant American soldiers who defeated Hitler, heroically crushed the Third Reich, and then managed to stop the invasion of "Russian barbarians" in Europe. How aviation Leipzig completely wiped off the allies with carpet bombings, having destroyed 250 thousand civilians, they prefer not to remember. Although Leipzig was deep in the rear, there were no important strategic sites, military enterprises, or a concentration of German troops in the city. But on the other hand, the US embassy supported Estonia’s reproaches against Russia for the “excessive bombardment” of Tallinn by Soviet aircraft during the war years. It turns out that liberating the Baltic states, Soviet troops, storming the well-fortified Tallinn, in which the German troops stubbornly defended, launched air strikes around the city. Tallinn, we note, at that time was the naval base of the German fleet. The crime of Soviet troops, according to Estonians and the US Embassy, ​​is that some city blocks were damaged by Soviet air strikes and 400 city residents were killed. The US reproaches for the bombing of Tallinn during the Second World War, after the nuclear attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the carpet bombing of North Vietnam, and also against the background of the recent bombing of Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, look especially original. By the way, the occupied Belgrade, in which there were almost no German troops, an armada of 600 Anglo-American aircraft subjected the seemingly completely senseless and brutal bombardment for the first time on Orthodox Easter on April 17, 1944. The second time, Belgrade NATO aircraft brutally bombed on Easter in 1999. But no one recalls this - strikes were made by the valiant troops of the democratic states, solely for the protection of European civilization. And, as you know, the European citizen for centuries, since the time of Tsar John the Terrible, has been constantly threatened by the invasion of "wild Muscovites." At first, Russia was threatened by Russian tsar tyrants, then bloodthirsty Stalin, then gloomy and gloomy general secretaries, but in 2008, the insidious Putin brought down armored armada on a peaceful, prosperous Georgia. And today, the dictator Putin is going to send his divisions to crush the “freedom and democracy” caterpillars of Russian tanks in Ukraine, in the Baltic countries, then fall on Poland, Sweden, Finland. The "high ideals" of the Charlie civilization are in danger. Old songs about the “Russian threat” sound in a new version.

It will probably soon become clear that the “Russian barbarians” storming Berlin in the 1945 year, without any need, but in their innate “wildness and Asian bloodthirstiness” destroyed the peaceful European city. Unfortunately, not only western so-called ones are working on the creation of such a myth. "Bona fide researchers" and filmmakers. And in Russia there are a sufficient number of “grantoedov” historians who, led by Gavriil Popov, spread tales about how the “hordes of Russian barbarians” outraged in Germany. In the US, they make films about how brave Americans "rescued Private Raina", dashing "Rangers" smashed selected parts of the Wehrmacht. And in the United States and Europe, the population was able to convince that it was the Americans who crushed the Third Reich and saved the world from fascism. Obama even managed to say that his grandfather, it turns out, liberated Auschwitz. And some Russian directors at this time make films “Bastards” and “A few days in May,” claiming that the film scripts are “based on documentary facts.” And when it turns out that all that is described in the films is just the fruit of a sick fantasy of scriptwriters, then these people justify their slander and lies of the artist’s right to “creative fiction”. None of these "artists" think to ask for forgiveness for trying to pass off lies and slander as "documentary evidence" of the Great Patriotic War. The contempt and hatred of their homeland "smerdyakov" in the twenty-first century remain the same as in the nineteenth century. But the “masterpieces” of the Great Patriotic War, diligently created according to the prescriptions of Dr. Goebbels, still remain in the Russian film distribution as well as filled with hatred for Russia and the Russian history of “Tzar” Lungin.

The state does not have the right to allow from the cinema screens the poison of Russophobic lies and slander to pour out into the souls of the audience. After all, over time, these false films will be referred to in the same way as Kurbsky’s letters and “impartial testimonies” of foreigners about the sovereign Ivan Vasilyevich the Terrible epoch are cited today.

Today there is no task more important than to preserve and convey to our children and grandchildren the truth about the magnificent, heroic and beautiful history of our Fatherland. It is necessary to resist the anti-Russian slander, telling the truth about the great Russian Sovereigns, about the holy ascetics of the Russian Orthodox Church, about the brave and courageous Russian heroes who for centuries reflected the invasions of enemies from the West, now from the East. The truth about the great nation, which by unceasing prayer, military feat and hard work, for centuries has created the Holy Russian State - the House of the Most Holy Theotokos.

May Holy Rus rise with the prayers of the Most Holy Theotokos and all the saints who shone forth in the Russian land, and squander it in opposition!

Holy Mother of God save us!
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    27 August 2016 15: 43
    Ivan the Terrible did a lot for the unity of Russia. But he was involved in the emergence of troubled times. The first turmoil is a consequence of his policy.
    1. avt
      +24
      27 August 2016 15: 48
      But involved in the emergence of troubled times. The first turmoil is a consequence of his policy.
      Yeah yeah ??? What are you talking about? wassat And we are sinners and did not know who and how many rules after his death. Although ....... if, as in his time to Eisenstein, according to his recollections, it seems, Stalin said - "He had to finish off a few boyar roles" But yes - it's my fault, I really didn't finish off the same Romanovs.
    2. +9
      27 August 2016 16: 42
      The first turmoil is a consequence of his policy.
      ... Guilty, Grozny is guilty that he was poisoned ...
    3. +3
      27 August 2016 17: 10
      Yes, well !!! Instead of reading liberals heavily, it’s better to visit libraries ... so as not to be foolish.
      1. 0
        29 August 2016 09: 24
        I generally copied the text. In our libraries of schools and the district center in general, you cannot find real historical documents. And you won’t get to the Russian State Archives in Leningrad. Where is Leningrad, and where is the Orenburg region. Yes, and the Internet (the same site RGIA) do not really trust. I trust those documents that I can not only see, but also touch! Or look with your own eyes in place, and not through a monitor.
    4. +5
      27 August 2016 17: 25
      Alekts73 Today, 15:43 New
      Ivan the Terrible did a lot for the unity of Russia.


      for the unity of Russia, his father, Ivan III, did a lot. And Ivan IV (Grozny) completely devastated Russia. he destroyed the Russian tradition of public assembly, together with the most prosperous part - Novgorod. And he called on the Tatars for help when he cut out the population of Novgorod. after Ivan the Terrible, Novgorod became a backwater. He prosralized all the wars that he started (except for Novgorod and Kazan 3 times), he left behind an empty treasury (although he inherited a super rich state from daddy).

      Who from here on the site of those present will go to the archive to read documents? yes no one. most will believe another nonsense on the Internet.
      take and read Klyuchevsky, Soloviev, etc. - it’s difficult to suspect them of engagement - they wrote even long before Lenin / Stalin / Gorbachev / Yeltsin :-)


      The whole article is continuous agitation. And here is Ukraine, Georgia and Putin ??
      The presence of Ivan the Terrible in Russian history is not an accusation or justification for anything. Well, there was one paranoid in power, and what? there were few of them at that time all over the world. but to inflate from this THEME - is paranoia today.
      1. +20
        27 August 2016 20: 06
        Firstly, not Ivan IV, but Ivan I - the first Russian Tsar (anointed to the kingdom)!

        Secondly, what really happened?
        Russia has made a huge leap forward in its development!
        The tsar expanded the country's borders, making Kazan, Astrakhan, Siberia, Pyatigorye and Nogai steppe the Russian provinces.
        An increase in the country's population by one and a half times is noted.
        New cities were built more than one and a half!
        The country's territory has doubled, making Russia bigger than all of Europe! The era of Grozny - the time of the formation of the Cossacks: they occupied the Don.
        Election of the administration was introduced and judicial reform was carried out. Regular troops, the state post office and the Pharmaceutical order appear. International trade is being improved and an Ambassadorial order is being created. Private underground prisons are banned and the state ransom of Rusics from Tatar captivity is legalized.
        Ivan Fedorov is printing the first book.
        With regards to the Tatars, this is Kazan and the battle near the village of Molody, where the 120-thousandth horde was destroyed, its raids on Moscow stopped, and the oprichnik Atalykin captured the commander of the army Divey-Murzu.

        You should know Russian history, unless of course you are Russian!
        1. +2
          27 August 2016 23: 30
          Russian history can even be known not to Russian.
          on business: everything is mixed up with you - facts confirmed by different sources, fables and fiction, including juggling facts.

          Historians of the last 200 years argue a lot about the role of this or that tsar in Russian history. Ivan the Terrible is probably the only king about whom all historians agree - the first years of the kingdom, he continues the work of his father in favor of Russia, then (for various reasons) he is increasingly surrounded by paranoia.
          but about the murder of his son is not an invention of "damned pindas ... owls" of those times - this is confirmed by all historians / data for the last 400 years.

          it is enough to read the letters of Grozny to understand how paranoid he was - from cruelty to endless night prayers "for expiation" and again to cruelty towards everyone, including his guardsmen.
          1. +4
            28 August 2016 06: 56
            Quote: vlad_vlad
            it is becoming increasingly paranoid.
            but about the murder of his son is not an invention of "damned pindas ... owls" of those times - this is confirmed by all historians / data for the last 400 years.

            The results of a study of the remains of his son and the king himself showed that both were poisoned.
            Quote: vlad_vlad
            from cruelty to endless night prayers "for atonement" and again to cruelty towards everyone

            Did he have a choice? When they begin to talk about cruelty, they forget a simple fact very well described in a song from one Soviet vaudeville:

            Almost every role always has a "but".
            And you decide: what is better and what is worse?
            Trying on crowns of those who wish is complete,
            A cap with a little bell, and a cap with a little bell,
            And the bell cap ... well, who needs it?

            And these "willing" are by no means the embodiment of meekness and mercy.
          2. +1
            10 November 2016 01: 46
            Enough to read, of course, but you didn’t read it, did you? For example, it is enough to read the correspondence with Elizabeth I:
            It is not known how, willingly or unwillingly, these people of your brother, Richard and his comrades, moored at the marina near our fortress on the Dvina. Then we, as befits Christian sovereigns, graciously showed them honor, received and treated them at the sovereign's ceremonial tables, granted and released them to your brother. And then the same Richard Richard and Richard Gray came to us from your brother. We also granted them and released them with honor. And after Richard Richardov came to us from your brother, we sent our envoy Osip Grigorievich Nepeya to your brother. And we gave your brother's merchants and all Englishmen such a free letter of salary, which even none of our merchants received, and we hoped for this great friendship on the part of your brother and you and the faithful service of all Englishmen. <...> And after that it became we know that your sister, Princess Mary, has passed away, and the Spanish king Philip was expelled from the kingdom by the British, and you were placed on the throne. But in this case, too, we did not inflict any harassment on your merchants and offered them to trade as before.
            Cruelty rolls over, just no urine!
            And still, no matter how many letters came, at least one had the same seal! All letters of seal are different. This is not in accordance with the custom accepted by the sovereigns — such letters are not believed in any states; each sovereign in the state should have a single seal. But even here we trusted all your letters and acted in accordance with these letters.
            What a damn paranoid! Just a savage! Give him the customs of sovereigns, you know!
            Johan III:
            When you receive this message of our sovereign, you, Johan, King of Sweden, Gotha and Wendi, will already know another instruction we have given earlier, in the month of January. This instruction described in detail how you sent to the feet of our domination to beat Paul, Bishop of Abovsky, when our highness was in his estate, in Veliky Novgorod, as the arrival of your ambassadors was reported to us in Veliky Novgorod, as we were still custom gave your ambassadors an instruction how your ambassadors irritated our majesty with their ridiculous behavior and we were angry with them, as we, being in Veliky Novgorod, wanted to turn our anger into your Swedish land for your insanity, and for what reason our greatness yours, hoping that you would come to your senses, put off your anger, condescending to the petition of your ambassadors to our sovereign Duma - Mikhail Kaybulovich Astrakhan with comrades, to the petition of our children and to petition of our thought, and how we, having released your ambassadors, sent them to you instruction and command how you deserve the forgiveness of our high majesty. A detailed instruction has been written about this to you more than once and a time limit has been set for the arrival of your ambassadors to us on our patrimony, Veliky Novgorod, on Troitsyn day this year. We, as a true Christian sovereign, have mercy on your Swedish land, restrained our anger and stopped the swearing fury.
            Zashkvar in general! The tyrant no longer holds himself in his hands!
            Stefan Batory:
            And when in your state there were pious Christian sovereigns - from Casimir to present Sigismund-Augustus, they regretted shedding Christian blood and sent their ambassadors to us, and our ambassadors went to them, and our boyars conducted preliminary negotiations with their ambassadors and made decisions several times beneficial for both sides, so that Christian blood does not flow in vain and peace and tranquility reigned among states - that is what the lords sought in former times. They used to go there and back, confront the ambassadors and reconcile again, and do business for a long time, and not turn around in one hour. And now we see and hear that in your land Christianity is diminishing; therefore, your glad, not worrying about the bloodshed among Christians, acts hastily. And you, King Stephen, would recall all this and reason: is this done according to Christian custom?
            <...>
            And then we learned that you are preparing for war. Then we sent your messenger Pyotr Garabourd to you, and with him our messenger Andrei Mikhalkov with a letter stating that you should not do this: cancel the oath and do everything anew; you should have completed the agreement that your ambassadors concluded with our boyars; and about Livonian land you must send your other ambassadors to us, and we will entrust the boyars to agree with them as they should. And you, not listening to this, fell into even greater fury and, breaking the oath of your ambassadors, drove our ambassadors out of your land, like some villains, not allowing them to see you.
            Wow, cruel! Krovushka directly floods eyes.

            The Crusader is a worthy descendant, but you are not a reader, you see, but a writer!
        2. +1
          25 January 2017 09: 47
          History is a fairy tale agreed upon by historians. Since the time of Ivan the Terrible, there are almost no documents left — the Romanovs tried, cleaned up!
      2. +4
        27 August 2016 20: 42
        It seems to me that the author of the commentary does not know the story very well, so the question of paranoid is very rhetorical.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. 0
        10 November 2016 02: 26
        Quote: vlad_vlad
        Who from here on the site of those present will go to the archive to read documents? Yes, no one.
        That's not you - for sure. You’d better reread the libel of your Teutonic ancestors Schlichting, Staden, Taube, who even confuse Novgorod (on Volkhov) with Nizhny Novgorod (on the Volga).
        Quote: vlad_vlad
        And Ivan IV (Grozny) completely devastated Russia. he destroyed the Russian tradition of public assembly, together with the most prosperous part - Novgorod. And he called on the Tatars for help when he cut out the population of Novgorod. after Ivan the Terrible, Novgorod became a backwater.
        It was so devastated that it had doubled in size, and the Kazan Tatars were baptized of their own free will and recorded on campaigns, he himself confirmed.
        Novgorod was not a backwater, either before or after, but was a trading city that did not benefit from the economic policy of Ivan IV, aimed at England, in which Novgorod objectively could not withstand competition. On this wave, Novgorod decided to go over to the Union of Lublin, which clearly should have been accompanied by an attempt to conspire with the accession of his man (coup d'etat, as they would say now) to prevent military opposition. Malyuta Skuratov carried out a special operation, typical by modern standards, to suppress a separatist uprising, with all the relying on investigative actions. Under the then criminal law, conspirators were executed, and as usual, in addition to the family, not without it (aiding was clearly investigated, otherwise at least 200 households would join the 200 nobles). However, these were hundreds of people (about 200 nobles and more than 100 households, 45 clerks and clerks and as many members of their families), if the Novgorod conspiracy succeeded, a full-fledged military operation would inevitably have followed with much greater casualties. All rulers suppressed uprisings at all times, but far from all did it so professionally, selectively and effectively, because separatist sentiments were eliminated once and for all. And Novgorod could become a backwater, simply unable to withstand the aforementioned economic competition with the Moscow trading company.
        At the same time, there is modern evidence (the Swedish ambassador Pavel Justen - from yours, so you won’t quarrel) about the famine that went on in those years in Novgorod (crop failures of the 1568 and 1569 years) and the plague epidemic, from here then your ideological inspiration attributed to the devastation and devastation of Novgorod To Ivan IV. Imagine your 500 technology has not changed for years, it’s time to come up with something new.
      5. 0
        6 August 2017 17: 00
        Quote: vlad_vlad
        Novgorod

        Novgorod, a free city. There were many such cities throughout Eurasia in those days! But the reason that these cities have become part of various states, including Russia, is another reason. You can dig, but the main fact that the hucksters ruled there, no one can refute, if only he would call them more liberal. And this, as a result, the situation is akin to today, when hucksters are not controlled by anyone, and in pursuit of profit, they can cross any borders!
      6. 0
        9 August 2017 14: 29
        Klyuchevsky and Solovyov wrote in the interests of the ruling Romanov dynasty, slandering the leading real Rurik dynasty was a political order of the time. Engagement is evident. Bolsheviks in the person of Stalin, on the contrary, saw the liquidation of the seditious boyar elite acting in the interests of foreign powers and constantly provoking trouble and corruption, glorious unfortunately, because of the humanity of Grozny, the incomplete and poured out into trouble and the collapse of the state
    5. +7
      27 August 2016 20: 36
      It’s to blame for not clearing all the traitors.
    6. +3
      28 August 2016 00: 03
      Ivan the Terrible did a lot for the unity of Russia. But he was involved in the emergence of troubled times. The first trouble caused by him

      Troubles are the consequences of an unprecedented long-term crop failure. Peasant farms went bankrupt, which gave the mobresource unrest. At first they plundered nearby estates, and when they were plundered, they all united into larger units and their goals were already larger. But the Moscow government did not have sufficient resources to solve this problem. Grain for distribution was categorically not enough, although such distributions were carried out.
      Well, and we must take into account that the boyars .. strongly pressed during the reign of Ivan 4, decided against this background to win back their lost privileges.
      Which in general led, in fact, to a civil war. Everything is against everyone.
  2. avt
    +32
    27 August 2016 15: 44
    And well done Orlovtsy! They struck, it means the monument to Van No.4 good He was a noble sovereign, it is not for nothing that they hang all the dogs on him because his “civilized” western and eastern counterparts played an order of magnitude more tricks and, in fact, according to the concepts of THAT time, it was quite comme il faut. But Vanya No. 4 badly annoyed his ancestors, common people "- even their distant descendants at the genetic level cannot bear the name of Vanino's spirit, and immediately their hair stands on end in all places. bully
    1. +3
      27 August 2016 17: 49
      I watched the news of the Eagle, oh and passion with this monument -
      at a meeting with workers at the Tekmash plant, the governor of the Oryol Region, Vadim Potomsky, did not rule out the possibility that the monument to Ivan the Terrible would be erected not in front of Free Space, but in a different place. Meanwhile, the head of the region emphasized that the monument will be erected in any case and even named the date - on September 7.
      http://newsorel.ru/fn_193466.html
      And further -
      On August 6, 2016, in the city of Aleksandrov, Vladimir Region, the oprichnina capital of Tsar Ivan the Terrible, opposite the tsar’s residence, and now the Aleksandrov Sloboda Museum, a stone was laid at the base of the monument to the first Russian Tsar. The monument itself is planned to be installed on November 4, 2016.
    2. +1
      27 August 2016 17: 52
      And well done Orlovtsy! They struck, it means the monument to Van No.4

      and even a pitchfork on the water, to be honest.
      local historical forum, you can follow the news
      http://www.orel-story.ru/forum/index.php?action=vthread&forum=1&topic=1117&page
      = 11
  3. +29
    27 August 2016 15: 52
    How so? Only Orlovites understood the greatness of Tsar John the Terrible ?????
    Zapadentsev cheated him as they could. The papal legate composed a tale that he had killed his son. This wacky and lousy Europe is glorified only by theft, murder and lies.
    When will we dump this liberal bastard in Russia and begin to know Slavic history, and not the nonsense of liberals and sodomites?
  4. +2
    27 August 2016 15: 56
    and I like baby feel I just can't find the complete collection of his works, I would love to "enlighten" wassat
  5. +6
    27 August 2016 16: 13
    The material is not bad. Only the author in vain mentioned the monologue-Tatars. But the Mongol-Tatar yoke, at last, was recognized as non-existent by the highest will. And Tartaria is recognized as real. Not even a century has passed! ...
    And religious vocabulary is not entirely appropriate. Still a secular site, not a cult site.
    It’s interesting, and if some author in the end of the article also gives glory to Allah or Buddha, how will the material go?
  6. +4
    27 August 2016 16: 17
    As long as we are ruled by sodomites, it will be so, and liberals are it. How did our family annoy the West so much that they are constantly at war with us? Apparently our ancestors did not weakly keep them in check, so they cannot defeat us in "hot" wars, but they win in information wars, and the fact that there is no our history is one of their victories.
    And the fact that the real history of Great Russia behind seven castles, apparently there is something that, having learned it, the Slavs will unite and throw off this tolerant-liberal yoke ......
  7. 0
    27 August 2016 16: 35
    But, despite this, many Tatars were baptized in the Kazan land under the holy hierarchs of Guria and Barsanuphius. It is significant that the Tsar not only did not arrange any persecution of Muslims, but demanded ...
    -------------------------------------------------- -
    ... And he farted with incense .....
    All Tatars who did not accept Christianity were expelled from the banks of the Volga and Kama inland. Today there is not a single Tatar settlement in these places, only Russian villages, and Keryashen (baptized Tatars)
    I’m equally divided that it was something — it was rubbed and forgotten, just don’t need to grind the luboks roughly.
    It will soon come to the point that Vanya was not Grozny and was eating exclusively nectar.
    For me, if he had not been who he was, Russia would not have grown under him five times the territory and almost the same population. And they would not have remembered him so often. There, the Silent was after him, and almost no memory of him remained.
    It doesn't happen that you eat a fish and everything else. Such a time was also what was done in that cruel age was the norm throughout the world. Ah Ivan the Terrible during the oprichnina 5 thousand souls destroyed! Yes, King Henry in one night cut the Huguenots several times more at the same time!
    So do not smear the heads of statesmen with oil and sprinkle with incense. They were what the era made them. And they are judged not by cruelty, but by accomplishments and achievements.
    1. +9
      27 August 2016 18: 23
      All Tatars who did not accept Christianity were expelled from the banks of the Volga and Kama inland. Today there is not a single Tatar settlement in these places, only Russian villages, and Keryashen (baptized Tatars)
      You know, I live in Bashkiria, we often go fishing to those places, but there are no "expelled" Tatars there, and I sat down, on the way, in a mix of Tatar, Chuvash, Mari. Russians, by the way, they are few. And as for Grozny, the story was so distorted that only a very self-confident person can say, specifically, how many souls he ruined. Stalin's time was perverted, and in fact, the witnesses of that time are still alive, and from whose words did Ivan Vasilyevich ruined 5000 souls? and 5000, even for that time a trifle. Our liberoids have destroyed a couple of orders of magnitude more in 25 years
      1. 0
        28 August 2016 11: 46
        You know, I live in Bashkiria, we often go fishing to those places, but there are no "expelled" Tatars there, and I sat down, on the way, mixed
        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        So you answered your question (I live in Bashkiria)
        I’ve been living here for 54 years and I remember grandfather’s stories of how their village was formed in the depths of the republic (purely Tatar) and I know the geography of the republic better. All large villages along the Volga and Kama within the Republic of Tatarstan now undoubtedly have a mixed population. At the same time, the history of their origin is easy to trace by name. It is not difficult, just look at the map. Not a single Tatar, which undoubtedly speaks in favor of my version. And this is historically justified by those that in those days the rivers were the main ways uniting the state. And the rulers were interested in having a loyal to power population along this path. This is just a fact that has nothing to do with my personal opinion regarding Ivan 4.
        Regarding how many souls he ruined, what does some kind of self-confidence have to do with it? In the end, there are chronicles and old documents with which serious people work, and to doubt their authenticity, this is the unreasonable "self-confidence" on our part.
        On the occasion (did not see the exiled Tatars) ... Okay, I will not be malicious, although I imagined your meeting: Ay wai! hello, guest daragoy, we, the exiled Tatars, greet you. All this is fortunately "the deeds of bygone years ..." And whoever remembers the old, that ... self-harm, karoch.
        My grandfather told a story that came down from my great-grandfather: they sent a priest to their funeral with the appropriate paper. The priest was taken and buried next to the deceased. They sent a detachment with an officer to investigate. Here the elder shoves him a piece of paper with a seal: you read it yourself, and it says, "The Highest command, to bury with the priest."
  8. +7
    27 August 2016 16: 38
    [b
    ] Not much time passed and in Hollywood they whipped up a feature film about how armadas of Russian tanks and hordes of Russian soldiers invaded Georgian land in August 2008.
    [/b] ... Well done ... they took off ... started misinformation ... And our "generals" did not take off from cinema ... At least here's the plot ... when a fighter of the Russian peacekeeping battalion is alone with a machine gun ... and a strong word .. turned the column of Georgian troops into the return line .. which was accompanied by foreign correspondents ... and all this was filmed .. the plot went around the whole world .. they are probably shy ...
    1. +1
      27 August 2016 18: 11
      Why didn't they take ours? There is a very mediocre "Olympus Inferno" and not very bad, with good battle scenes "August the Eighth" ...
    2. 0
      27 August 2016 20: 47
      Do not let the patriots on the screen, in honor of Ki Lungins and the like.
  9. +4
    27 August 2016 16: 53
    Of course a plus. But, the author would need to learn a little more materiel. Especially about the Templars and the Swordsmen. And there is no need here to attract a writer with the pseudonym Walter Scott, who wrote in (!!!!) the 19th century !!!!!!! (because "Ivanhoe" and "Robin Hood" are typical female knightly novels, in which there is no words), when a wild amount of myths circulated about the Middle Ages (as, indeed, now among the inhabitants) !!!! And in general, did the author read "Ivanhoe"?
  10. +2
    27 August 2016 16: 58
    And yes, about the end of the article. Author, read the Constitution of the Russian Federation. So, for self-education.
  11. 0
    27 August 2016 17: 08
    Quote: erased
    The material is not bad. Only the author in vain mentioned the monologue-Tatars. But the Mongol-Tatar yoke, at last, was recognized as non-existent by the highest will. And Tartaria is recognized as real. Not even a century has passed! ...
    And religious vocabulary is not entirely appropriate. Still a secular site, not a cult site.
    It’s interesting, and if some author in the end of the article also gives glory to Allah or Buddha, how will the material go?

    Hoping, of course, is necessary for yourself, but you can’t always overcome circumstances by your own will, then rely on God. It’s just in such troubled times, as you don’t know what to hope now, this is what the author had in mind. Article +.
  12. +10
    27 August 2016 17: 55
    Quote: vlad_vlad
    for the unity of Russia, his father did a lot - Ivan III

    If his father were Ivan, he would be Ivan Ivanovich, and he Ivan Vasilyevich. Learn materiel.
    1. 0
      29 August 2016 09: 15
      Haha Well done, besieged ignoramus! And then you go - you got into a habit of defecating!
    2. +1
      10 November 2016 02: 32
      And that’s all you need to know about liberal historiography. lol
  13. +24
    27 August 2016 18: 00
    Regularly, once in 100-150 years, great enemy invasions occur in Russia. They end up for the aggressor, as a rule, very pitiable, more precisely catastrophically. Millions of Gauls, Aryans and their satellites with their biomass fertilize the soil of the endless East European Plain. Since these invasions have happened several times, it is already possible to single out certain patterns. Gaps between invasions can be divided into 3 conditional parts.
    1. In the first part of the 30-50 length of years, all the surviving theorists and practitioners of the previous invasion together sprinkle ashes on their heads, repent and conjure descendants to do nothing more than that. They cite wise countrymen and ancestors, they themselves say that no one, never, under any circumstances and for any need, would go to the East, for this is an absolutely perilous business. These Russians, they say, are made from some other test, as always, any of our wisdom and cunning will respond with their unpredictable stupidity, etc. and the like, and all that, and in the end, they will certainly win.
    2. In the second part, 30-50 years long, the newly born highbrow, clever and clever people wrinkle and rub their foreheads and say: “We do not understand anything, a paradox of some kind. Everything was perfectly planned, prepared, the most convenient moment was chosen, the best people were attracted, minds and powers. What is the reason for the failure? " And they begin to dig intensively in the annals and memoirs, use the simplex and complex, analysis and synthesis, integral and differential, dialectics and metaphysics, logic and scholasticism. They attract candidates and doctors, masters and academicians, champions and laureates, journalists and writers. Here both our razunov and volkogonovs are connected. And finally they knock themselves on the forehead and shout: "Eureka". Here it is, a thousand and one causes of the disaster. If you eliminate them, then everything will be okay. And in general, the Russian victory is a tragic combination of circumstances and accidents, a senseless and stupid story and a complete historical misunderstanding that defies scientific comprehension.
    3. And now comes the third part, 30-50 years long. The old and new high-browed clever and clever men again intensely wrinkle and rub their foreheads and utter new goals and objectives. Madeleine Albright believes that with a population density of less than 2 people per square kilometer, this territory must certainly be interned for the benefit of the world community. Condoleezza Rice will declare Afghanistan a springboard for promoting democracy in Central Asia and further north. Ex-hippie John Kerry will come up with the idea that it is more convenient and safest to fight the Russians to the last Ukrainian, etc. etc. And it doesn't matter that while Madeleine is looked at as a shizu, from Afghanistan, instead of a triumphal march of democracy, another Dunkirk is highlighted, and the further fate of their beloved Ukraine is a big, big question. Despite this sirs, peers and madam are working hard. The main task of this part is to unite Europe, find, prepare and mobilize millions of frostbitten landsknechts and raise another Fuhrer or Buonaparte, who will lead the crazy Europeans once again "Drang nach Osten". It's not that easy. After all, you have to go to the bear. It is known that having piled up in a crowd, you can even fill it up, although this is not an indisputable fact. But he will definitely break the first ones. Therefore, no one wants to be the first. To do this, you need to find fools. For many centuries the role of these fools was played by the Turks and Poles, along with the allied and subordinate tribes. Wise Europeans regularly sent them east for slaughter. More than once, the Germans, Swedes and French, once even the British, were noted as fools. The Americans, mind you, are too smart to do such a stupid job themselves. Now the old fools have already been taught, so they are looking for new ones. Recently, in this field, even the Georgians tried unsuccessfully to find laurels, now the Americans have contracted the Ukrainians. Moreover, very inexpensively, practically for pies on the Maidan, they got their hands on several million crazy fighting cockerels, ready to daringly rush at anyone whom the trainer points out. And Ukraine itself will obediently and for a long time play the role of the hungry, but evil watchdog of the West in the southwest of Russia. This is an unheard-of, since the time of Gorbachev's betrayal, the luck of the united West, and the most honest Western politicians have already openly declared that they will selflessly fight Russia "to the last living Ukrainian." They are echoed by the rulers of Ukraine, who declared their country the "bulletproof vest" of the West. To what extent do these leaders need to hate and despise their people in order to throw them at a bear? It is also interesting how long it will take for our Ukrainian brothers to realize this simple setup and deal with their occupation power.
    1. 0
      27 August 2016 18: 16
      They did not forge the rogatina to go to the "bear"! Plusy !!!!
      PS Rogatina is a spear with a long and wide leaf-shaped tip and a shoulder above the mount. Especially for big game hunting: wild boar, ect bear
    2. 0
      27 August 2016 20: 34
      Centurion! 18..00. A plus!!!
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. +12
    27 August 2016 18: 07
    The Fuhrer is also not easy. And the former European Fuhrers did not immediately agree. At the very least, they taught history in school and initially sent highbrow and hook-nosed theorists to three Russian letters. And the current candidates for the Fuhrer know the lessons of history very well, after all, at Harvard, Oxford and Sorbonne, their gentry are taught theories of probability and risk assessment. And with difficulty, a united Europe constantly strives to crack at the seams. But from the united Europe of Russia there has never been anything good. NEVER. Moreover, there will be nothing good even now, from a united Europe and even united with North America. This union is called NATO. Therefore, the revenge-seekers of all kinds are working hard, our collaborators, defectors, defeatists, capitulators and Vlasovists of all stripes are helping them hard, and they are hurting us hard and if they have everything stuck together ... then the story will repeat again. In this permanent story, everything would be nothing if it were not for one big BUT. In order to pack these millions of uninvited Anglo-Saxons, Gauls, Aryans and their satellites, as well as Vlasovites who joined them, it is necessary to put at least as many of their boys and girls in a different way. And since the reflection of aggression, as a rule, takes place on our territory, we need to add as many more civilians. Here is such a centuries-old and joyless arithmetic. And we are now living at the very beginning of the third part, because all these foreign bugs and our home-grown tolerant candidates for policemen, elders and burgomasters are so exhausted and fussing about.
  16. +1
    27 August 2016 18: 25
    To save Europe from the "Russian aggressors" in 1709, Karl XII set out on a campaign in Moscow. Author: Victor Saulkin

    But what about the battle of the village of Lesnoy (September 1708), fought by Peter I, "the mother of the Poltava victory"? Before the author, before! "... at the end of October 1 Karl moved east from the Poznan region." http://weapons-world.ru/books/item/f1707/s00/z00/st0000015.shtml
    In January 1708, Charles 12 took Grodno.
    Poltava battle. The date of the battle fell on the day of memory of the Monk Sampson the stranger ... July 8, 1709
  17. +2
    27 August 2016 19: 04
    It seems to me that this situation arose from the fact that the villains are practically not in danger, they won’t even let them fill their faces. The whole culture of the West is impunity, any threat to receive change is immediately declared * barbarism * or whatever, it all depends on the measure of fear.
    In RUSSIA, too, the scum divorced that, contrary to the facts, they lie and are not afraid of anything, they are not only protected but also taken for state * food *.
    It is time for the Government of RUSSIA to WRITE and begin to defend themselves against * librasts *. Why are they afraid * to offend * outright enemies and villains? Why do government officials allow themselves anti-Russian demarches?
    Why are figures from * culture * not responsible for anti-Russian libel?
  18. +3
    27 August 2016 19: 22
    I would argue with some statements of the article, but the main idea, I think, is correct. This is that our moral "yardstick" cannot be applied to the inhabitants of Western Europe. How many times have been burned.
    And the modern information war has gone from the pen of the recently deceased sociologist Toffler, who came up with the idea that if you constantly repeat something in the media and virtual reality, then reality itself will become like that. In his works, he carefully avoided Russia, apparently fearing that on its territory his spells did not work.
    1. +3
      27 August 2016 20: 45
      19.22. Religious wars can probably also be called informational. Only then they ended in a real war. The same America was populated with a cross and a sword. Today, radical Islam is making its way. It begins with the word, ends with the killings. They are not so harmless these information wars. And how was the Union collapsed? First there was a word, then a deed, then a body. It turns out that inform war is a very dangerous thing. Although it seems that the word does not carry any threats. And the words are peaceful. Like a no-fly zone, peaceful demonstrators, human rights ... But at the exit in reality?
      1. +1
        6 August 2017 18: 55
        Quote: Region 34
        Today, radical Islam

        Radical Islam is a continuation of the fragmentation of a single religion, one law. And there is only one reason for this, an attempt to form a new population subordinate only to itself, which does not accept the old. This is as a consequence and the rejection of the memory of ancestors and even of the first saints, prophets, truly righteous people.
        And religious wars, it’s just an attempt by some to separate from others, and the first in this case, to maintain and assert their power from where the genocides and other inequalities of the population of different faiths, in which religion belongs to the ruling class !!!!!
    2. 0
      28 August 2016 16: 20
      In fact, Goebbels brought this idea to Toffler, declaring: "The more grandiose a lie, the sooner they will believe it" (quote from memory, but this meaning). And there is also a saying that if a person is called a pig a hundred times, then at 101 he will grunt!
      So Toffler only theoretically formalized the practice of Goebels and folk wisdom.
  19. +1
    27 August 2016 19: 23
    As for the first information war, I would rather take my word for it, but the rest of the article reflects, in my opinion, the opinion and worldview of the author. And it was just the era of the late Middle Ages and it is not correct to evaluate it from the modern point of view. The only constants are we always lag behind the West technically and technologically. West with enviable constancy shows aggression towards us and receives p ....... th.
    1. +5
      27 August 2016 21: 26
      As for the technical and technological backlog, I would not say much either. Take an interest in steam engines in Altai, or, for example, where the silver came from in Russia.
    2. +1
      28 August 2016 16: 35
      = AID.S Late Middle Ages and evaluating it from a modern point of view is not correct

      So the whole point is that in the West it is our history that is measured by the modern yardstick, and their "bloody tyrants" are treated with reverence and understanding - a discount for the historical era ...
  20. +11
    27 August 2016 20: 04
    And the glorious Arkhangelsk city (Arkhangelsk) was also founded by Ivan Vasilievich! And also deserved a monument!
  21. +11
    27 August 2016 22: 42
    An interesting pattern is that the more the ruler of Russia has done for the good of his country, the more he is obgazed in the West. And at the same time, ideology does not have the slightest significance, even to the West who he is — the king, the secretary general, or the president. So, look to our rulers to the west is not worth it. In their eyes, only such a traitor as Gorbachev can be good.
    1. 0
      28 August 2016 00: 29
      So it’s logical, isn't it drinks
    2. 0
      25 January 2017 16: 49
      And what books, what authors in the West can you name, where the same Grozny, Peter the Great is "fouled" ... well, at least one link: author, book, publishing house. year, p ...
    3. 0
      9 August 2017 14: 34
      If our enemies scold us, then we are doing everything right (s)
  22. 0
    28 August 2016 06: 58
    Quote: Vasily50
    It is time for the Government of RUSSIA to WRITE and begin to defend themselves against * librasts *. Why are they afraid * to offend * outright enemies and villains? Why do government officials allow themselves anti-Russian demarches?

    Waking up is good, but how can it do it? The government has a majority of liberals. Laws are adopted with such wording that it would be better if these laws were not. One juvenile and protecting the rights of the child is worth it.
    Therefore, civil servants even spit on these laws, knowing that they are above the law.
  23. +3
    28 August 2016 09: 57
    Stalin's contribution to the formation of our state is no less enormous, if not more than Grozny (especially against the background of Gorbachev), and as a result - the fooling of the whole world and his own people by the Western (and also their own) media. It is not surprising that the next Western invasion was destroyed by a "tyrant", a "bloody dictator" and further down the list. What is typical, and we ourselves happily join the flagellation, we release films, books, give lectures and other things about the "enemy of the people" who preserved our state and increased its wealth.
  24. +1
    28 August 2016 16: 21
    And where is the anti-Russian propaganda of the times of Ivan the Terrible? The author did not disclose the topic, but simply wrote a little bit about everything. And to be offended by the enemy for his work is stupid and pointless. You just need to reveal his meanness and baseness. But those who conduct subversive work within the country cause disgust and hatred. Send them all to Kiev! So that they share the fate of Sheremet and Schetinin.
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. +1
    28 August 2016 20: 31
    No words, pah ... Well this is necessary to post such an article!
  27. 0
    28 August 2016 21: 34
    Quote: Mangel Alys
    No words, pah ... Well this is necessary to post such an article!

    My friend, are you not a liberalist for an hour? The justification of their position is for suckers, but emotions are over the edge stop

    And on a subject - there is such a writer. Bushkov Alexander. Well, yes, the same one, "Piranha" and other bestsellers (no kidding). Well, you can recall the controversial "Russia, which was not." So that's it. He has a surprisingly adequate book, full of quotes and reminiscences of his contemporaries. "Ivan the Terrible. Bloody poet." I recommend reading it. Incidentally, it perfectly fits the impression of the article, who is "fi!" did not squeal, but received information and pondered it.
    Oh yes, about the "bloody tyrants". He also has the "Red Monarch" dilogy. I don't think I need to say who this book is about. It does not pretend to be the ultimate truth, but it reads very interesting, and the look is a little from the other side. I'm not an advertiser, if anything. I read it myself, I advise it myself hi
  28. +1
    29 August 2016 06: 25
    [quote = wildcat398Dear friend, aren't you a liberal for an hour? : [/ quote]
    No son, not a liberal. And as for the justifications, look into the history of my comment, you may also see clearly.
  29. +1
    29 August 2016 06: 58
    In these talented poems by Fyodor Ivanovich Tyutchev, the entire centuries-old information war of a trap against Russia, a war primarily civilized.

    To the Slavs

    Hello to you sincere brothers
    From all the Slavic ends
    Hello to all of you, without exception!
    For everyone, a family feast is ready!
    No wonder Russia called you
    On a holiday of peace and love;
    But you know, dear guests,
    You are not guests here, you are yours!

    You are at home here, and more at home,
    Than there, in his homeland, -
    Here where domination is unfamiliar
    Foreign authorities
    Here, where power and allegiance
    One language, one for everyone
    And Slavism is not considered
    For grave original sin!



    Although hostile fate
    And we were separated
    But still we are one people,
    Single mother sons;
    But still we are brothers!
    Here, that's what they hate in us!
    Russia doesn’t say goodbye to you
    Russia - do not forgive in you!

    Confuses them, and to fright,
    What is the whole Slavic family
    In face and foe and friend
    For the first time he will say: “It's me!”
    With persistent remembrance
    About a long chain of evil grievances
    Slavic self-awareness,
    Like God's punishment, they are afraid!



    Long on European soil,
    Where lies are so overgrown,
    A long time Pharisee science
    The double truth has been created:
    For them - the law and equal rights,
    For us - violence and deceit,
    And secured the old age
    They are like the legacy of the Slavs.

    And what has been going on for centuries
    Not exhausted and raise yourself
    And gravitates over us too -
    Above us gathered here ...
    Still sore from old pains
    All modern time ...
    Not touched by the Kosovo field
    The White Mountain is not torn!



    And between us - a great shame
    In a Slavic, native environment,
    Only he left their opals
    And did not undergo their enmity,
    Who is always and everywhere for his
    The villain was advanced:
    They are only our Judas
    Honored with their kisses.

    Disgraced World Tribe
    When will you be the people?
    When time will be abolished
    Yours and discord and adversity,
    And the cry to the union will strike
    And collapse what divides us? ..
    We wait and believe in providence -
    He knows the day and the hour ...

    And this faith in the truth of God
    Already in our chest does not die,
    Though many victims and many sorrows
    We also see ahead ...
    He is alive - the supreme Provider
    And the court didn’t impoverish him,
    And the word Tsar the Liberator
    The limit will speak for Russian ...

    November 1867, XNUMX

    Do not add, do not decrease!
  30. +1
    29 August 2016 08: 02
    Quote: Mangel Alys
    [quote = wildcat398Dear friend, are you not a liberalist for an hour? :

    No son, not a liberal. And as for the justifications, look into the history of my comment, you may see it. [/ Quote]
    Why should I look into the history of comments, if - here it is an article, here and now? Or that, feel sorry for the fingers, write your informed opinion? And about "you will see" - less show-off, please. You are not jesus
  31. 0
    29 August 2016 09: 27
    It is a pity that the TRUE historical documents are not published. Yes, and there is no faith in modern references - a lie, I drive on lies and deception. It was under the USSR that they believed the printed word. And only in modern Russia "... the publishing house is not responsible for the reliability of the published material ..."
    1. 0
      25 January 2017 16: 55
      For starters, you can read at least PSRL. This is already something. The fact that the authors of such articles do not even read. An irresistible argument - "everything was rewritten there by Schlözer and Miller." But the volume of work is beyond the power of 10 Millers and Schletzers. Although ... they write that Carter forged the golden coffin of Tutankhamun. They either forget about spectral analysis or "He bought Egyptian gold on the market!" The trouble is that you can't prove anything to such a fool, it’s empty, in the head.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"