Media: Russia has stopped using the Iranian base Hamadan

116
Russian VKS suspended the use of the Hamadan airbase, reports RIA News a message from the Iranian agency Tasnim, citing a diplomatic source.





RIA "News»Emphasizes that the official comment of the Russian side on this issue does not yet have.

Earlier, the Iranian authorities claimed that Moscow could use the Hamadan base to fight terrorists "as long as it is necessary."

The agency recalls that Russian aircraft first flew from the Iranian base to attack terrorist groups last week.
  • AP Photo / WarfareWW
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

116 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. PKK
    +9
    August 22 2016
    Is this really after the scandal in the media, when the bloodied baby was pulled out of the rubble, after an air strike.
    And in this place several reporters appeared in advance who filmed everything that was happening.
    If so, then it’s sad, our propaganda is not the first time late.
    1. +14
      August 22 2016
      Some crap.
      All references come from Western sources, there is nothing from ours, no matter how stuffing it is, with a twist and an attempt to split between us and Iran.
      1. +5
        August 22 2016
        If you stopped using it after one departure from this airfield, then that means the circumstances. Someday we'll find out the reasons. Although I did not hear the sounds of the planes returning to our airfield. The boom is waiting for messages from the Russian Defense Ministry.
        1. +16
          August 22 2016
          It seems the Persians wanted too much from Russia and we had to refuse them, in response they asked us to free their base,
          but these are my speculations.
          1. +1
            August 22 2016
            Is this not due to the demonstration of a new Iranian tank and air defense system, so similar to their Russian counterparts? Maybe there were warnings from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, and the Iranians, how did the Eastern people rush to publicly "bargain" right away? ..
            1. +6
              August 22 2016
              Among the Persians, the "opposition" demanded to explain the presence of foreign troops, despite the fact that this is prohibited by the constitution. They could banal when allowed.
          2. +5
            August 22 2016
            It seems the Persians wanted too much from Russia and we had to refuse them, in response they asked us to free their base,
            but these are my speculations.

            They didn’t want anything.
            They, more than openly, expressed their position, which unequivocally suggests that the Russian Federation can use their territory to solve combat missions.
            Russia has also demonstrated that it is practically, and not declaratively, capable of expanding its presence and strike component in the region, if necessary, within a few days.
            In fact, the mattresses explicitly stated that there is no need to escalate the situation.
            Well, the fact that the Russian Federation on an ongoing basis until it gets up there can be justified from the point of view of the organizational and financial component.
            It’s necessary not only to place airplanes on take-off, it’s also necessary for all related services of armament, technical support, commissary and food, w / engineering support, communications, etc., etc. ...... It’s expensive and difficult .
            And then beacons to the mattresses - "do not spoil, otherwise" ... and it turns out that this turned out to be sufficient for the mattresses to rethink their "tactics and strategy". Apparently they "moved a little", and the Russian Federation in connection with the "emerging mutual understanding" did not begin to develop the topic of basing. While....
            1. +1
              August 23 2016
              They simply demonstrated that they can be used as an approach airfield. Arrived, refueled, took on board weapons, bombed, sat down, repeated the cycle. Etc
        2. +5
          August 22 2016
          It seems the Persians wanted too much from Russia and we had to refuse them, in response they asked us to free their base,
          but these are my speculations.
          1. +3
            August 22 2016
            But duplicate your message to what?
            1. +9
              August 22 2016
              Quote: cniza
              It seems the Persians wanted too much from Russia and we had to refuse them, in response they asked us to free their base,
              but these are my speculations.

              ... Guys, who is the last one in the queue for the comment "everything is lost"? ... Iran merged us, we merged Iran ... laughing and this is in VO, sdid and shame ... maybe even read what the Defense Ministry says about it:
              MOSCOW, Aug 22 - RIA News. The further use of the Hamadan airbase in Iran by Russian airspace forces will be regulated by mutual agreements and will depend on the situation in Syria, Igor Konashenkov, spokesman for the Russian Defense Ministry, told reporters.
              According to him, all the planes that attacked the militants from the Hamadan air base returned to Russia. Konashenkov stressed that aviation successfully completed its tasks.

              As the first deputy chairman of the State Duma Defense Committee Sergei Zhigarev noted, the Hamadan airbase was used "within the framework of operational measures, partnership relations for a short period."
              ... ah, on VO there is a panic ... the client is removed the plaster cast, "Mikhail Svetlov" is a man-steamer, the station is leaving, the boss - everything is gone ... Mom ... Lelik ... wink
      2. +1
        August 22 2016
        Iranian Foreign Ministry announces completion of Russia's use of base in Hamadan
        Russia's use of an air base in the Iranian city of Hamadan to launch terrorist attacks in Syria has been completed, said Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Bahram Gasemi.
        Iran refused to transfer to Russia a military base in Hamadan for using the airborne forces to launch air strikes on the ATS. This statement was made by the Minister of Defense of the Islamic Republic, Hossein Dehgan.
        "Under no circumstances will we provide the Russian Federation with a military base. They have not arrived here forever," However, Tehran has not officially confirmed the defense minister's statements yet.
        The Russian Ministry of Defense also did not comment on Dehgan’s words.
        1. +5
          August 22 2016
          Moscow does not see any obstacles to the further use of Iranian infrastructure, in particular, the Hamadan air base, with the aim of attacking terrorists in Syria. Such a statement today, August 22, was made by Russian Ambassador to Tehran Levan Jagaryan.

          The ambassador confirmed that Russian planes had already left the Iranian base of Hamadan. As Jagaryan emphasized, it is likely that the use of the Russian Air Force air base in Iran may resume. According to him, if both parties consider it appropriate and appropriate agreements are reached, then no problems should arise.
      3. +2
        August 22 2016
        The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has made a statement that Russia has suspended the use of the Hamadan air base.


        All week strategic bombers
        Tu-22M3 was operated from the Hamadan military base
        However, according to the representative of the Iranian Foreign Ministry, Bahram Gasemi, this decision will not affect the relations of Moscow and Tehran, which are strategic in nature.

        Gasemi notes that in the fight against terrorism and the Islamic State banned terrorist organization in our country, the positions of Iran and Russia are very close, and the difficult situation in this region dictates to the Iranian side in every way to help the Russian military operation in Syria ....
        Source: http://rueconomics.ru/191857-zamorozka-hamadana-na-uhod-rossii-povliyala-situac
        iya-vokrug-kurdov
        1. +1
          August 22 2016
          Former Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh gave an interview to Yemen Today, in which he asked Russia for military assistance.

          Saleh said that he would like to restore with Russia all the agreements once concluded between Yemen and the USSR. He added that if the Russian Federation decides to support him in the struggle for the liberation of the country, he will be able to use all military bases, seaports and airports of Yemen.

          According to Saleh, Russia is the "closest relative" of Yemen, and the UN Security Council will not be against such cooperation. Apparently, the former president was impressed by the military mission of the Russian Federation in Syria, thanks to which the government of Bashar al-Assad was saved.

          The Rada admitted that they lied about the aggression of Russia in the Donbass
          The Pentagon ridiculed Poroshenko for a lie about the invasion of Russia
          In Ukraine, three areas officially ceased to obey Kiev - Zakharov
          Ali Abdullah Saleh was removed from power in 2012, but retained the support of the Hussite movement. ...
          Source: http://politexpert.net/10567-eks-prezident-iemena-saleh-prizval-rossiyu-vvesti-
          military
    2. +8
      August 22 2016
      Do you have the official statement of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation on this base? I won’t believe it until I see the official ..
      1. +5
        August 22 2016
        Iranian Defense Minister Hossein Dehgan criticized Russian colleagues for divulging information about the use of the Iranian airfield Hamadan by the Russian Air Force.
        https://news.mail.ru/politics/26856793/?frommail=1
    3. +1
      August 22 2016
      Is it really after the media scandal, when the bloodied kid was pulled out of the rubble, after an air strike. [Quote] [/ quote] But can this be due to the fact that ours asked for a corridor for cruise missiles? like it was like that, it was bombed by airplanes, and now they decided to fix this business with Caliber wink Well, as an option
    4. +5
      August 22 2016
      Stopped - does not mean that she refused. There are reasons for everything.
    5. +1
      August 22 2016
      rather, this is a tactical move by Russia towards the United States showing that outside of Russia we can use other people's bases and we do not need to spend huge amounts of money on them constantly
    6. +7
      August 22 2016
      Yes, most likely, the Americans threatened them again with sanctions and an economic blockade, and Iran only just began to beat off its interest in the Saudi markets with dumping, that’s friendship is friendship, and each has its own stomach.
      When the Persians have clear guarantees that their oil will be bought up in spite of all kinds of blockades and traded with them, then they will at least provide their bases to China, even they will provide us with North Korea.
    7. 0
      August 22 2016
      Commenting on the information that Russia has ceased to use the air base in Iran, Russian Ambassador to Tehran Levan Jagaryan said: "At the moment, none of ours are on Hamadan."

      His words are quoted by "Interfax"
      1. +4
        August 22 2016
        Here is another view:
  2. +9
    August 22 2016
    Something suspiciously fast. If this is true, then it was probably a test for "partner concerns." But one thing is certain - our planes will return there very soon.
    1. +4
      August 22 2016
      Something suspiciously fast. If this is true, then it was probably a test for "partner concerns." But one thing is certain - our planes will return there very soon.
      Will definitely return if there is a need. And the airfield was not used as a base, but exactly as the airfield, where the planes refueled, the crews rested, and there was a routine routine. The base in this case is too loudly said.
  3. +2
    August 22 2016
    Stopped or suspended ?? !! These are still very different things! Quickly something.
    1. +10
      August 22 2016
      Time will tell.
      “Russia has no base in Iran, it is not based here. They performed this operation, and it is currently completed, ”said Gasemi (quoted by Reuters).
      1. +3
        August 22 2016
        Thank you, much more informative than the article)
    2. +1
      August 22 2016
      Stopped or suspended ?? !! These are still very different things! Quickly something.


      Stopped or suspended? Actually, this is just not important. Is the permission to fly through Iran-Iraq valid or not? If valid, then landing in Hamadan is possible.
      1. 0
        August 22 2016
        If they stopped - a week after the start, then what happened there? But if you have stopped then there are a lot of options, from it is not necessary yet, until we have already done everything.
        1. +2
          August 22 2016
          If they stopped - a week after the start, then what happened there?


          I think that they got there only for refueling, it is unlikely that the bombs were already brought there.
          So crowing ran ahead of the engine. Moreover, the Su-34 from Hamadan did not work. Why drive them to Iran, they work from Khmeimim.
          1. +2
            August 22 2016
            I thought that the base for a while would not be dug in there, as in Syria, if it flew in, refueled, picked up bombs and flew, no more. And even then, most likely only when the goals are far from Hmeimim.

            Yes, like here
  4. +2
    August 22 2016
    Strange news ... unexpected, as they say. The Persians were offended by something. Or they were someone pressed a sore spot ...
    1. +1
      August 22 2016
      Obviously, in this case, both.
  5. +3
    August 22 2016
    We need to wait for the official comments of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or the DEFENSE! And so it is, uhhh and not news!
    1. +3
      August 22 2016
      Iran’s defense minister yesterday across the country called Russia's actions not friendly in using the base:
      #Breaking #Iran Def Minister says "# Russia / ns did not act friendly by revealing that they are using our airbase."

      Iranian Foreign Minister said Russia withdrew from Hamadai:
      # Russia's use of #Hamedan airbase (for attacking terrorists in #Syria) has ended for now, #Iran MFA spox said.
      #Iran MFA spox: Neither has #Russia a base in Iran, nor has it been deployed. That was an issue which took place & has finished for now.
      1. +3
        August 22 2016
        But I just saw this quote: “Russia has no base in Iran, it is not based here. They performed this operation, and it is currently completed, ”said Gasemi (quoted by Reuters).
        And where is the hostility and so on?
        1. +1
          August 22 2016
          in pursuit
          The head of the department was asked why Iran was not the first to announce that Russian planes are now at the airport. Dehgan replied: “First, Russia is interested in demonstrating that it is a superpower and can have a serious impact on the security situation.” “Behind the disclosure of this information there is a disrespectful attitude and a desire to show off,” the minister added, quoted by the BBC Russian Service.
          1. +1
            August 22 2016
            Quote: Stirbjorn
            “Behind the disclosure of this information there is a disrespectful attitude and a desire to show off,” added the minister, quoted by the BBC Russian Service.


            But were we the first to say that we have a base in Iran? It seems that the American media were the first to make a fuss.
  6. +3
    August 22 2016
    I will count this news for the duck so far ....
  7. 0
    August 22 2016
    Quote: matRoss
    Strange news ... unexpected, as they say. The Persians were offended by something. Or they were someone pressed a sore spot ...

    Wait, you tear the hair on the crown. Again "a competent source close to the cleaning lady of the Ministry of Defense, who wished to remain anonymous." Let's wait for the official version, then it will be possible to suck on it.
    1. +4
      August 22 2016
      The TASS report with reference to the official representative of the Iranian Foreign Ministry is not enough for you "official version" for sucking?
  8. 0
    August 22 2016
    If this is true, then the Americans applaud themselves and the State Department. Oh, this foreign policy and diplomacy.
  9. +27
    August 22 2016
    I think we didn’t like the infrastructure ... or what else ... it’s better on the spot. and yes: Administrators, it became boring and inconvenient to use the site, it became not so attractive, it became difficult and dreary to communicate, in general V. I. Chernomyrdin: "we wanted the best, it turned out as always ...".
    1. +17
      August 22 2016
      Administrators, using the site has become boring and not convenient, it has become not so attractive, it has become difficult and dreary to communicate


      Well, why are you so ... quiet, decent, whispering .... As in a good well-kept cemetery ... wink
    2. +11
      August 22 2016
      Yes, without "cons" is somehow boring!
      1. +8
        August 22 2016
        oh well ... expanse ... and you won’t knock a troll on a tambourine ...
        1. +2
          August 22 2016
          Yes, they allowed me only to make a choice - to kiss, not to kiss ... Well, I really didn’t like all these innovations.
    3. +25
      August 22 2016
      About infrastructure - nonsense. And the site - yes, it was completely ruined.
      1. +6
        August 22 2016
        I also think that the site was ruined, they came up with some kind of crap.
  10. +2
    August 22 2016
    Wait a bit, right now another topic about the water around the Crimea will appear. We will break the spears ...
  11. 0
    August 22 2016
    Yes, not corny paid!
  12. 0
    August 22 2016
    It’s somehow strange ... The Iranians should have understood that our 22nd non-humanitarian aid deliveries ...
    Who and whom, and most importantly - by what - pressed?
    I don’t think ours made this decision ...
  13. +1
    August 22 2016
    According to rumors, the Iranians are ready this base for us. provide, but., on unfavorable conditions for us. At first they gave us a baso, but when ours said that it was just what you needed, the cunning Persians put forward a carriage of different conditions.
    1. 0
      August 22 2016
      Got data?
  14. 0
    August 22 2016
    Quote: dmi.pris
    Do you have an official statement of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation on this base? I won’t believe it until I see the official.

    Here I am too. Whether it is true or not does not matter. This is not so, while there is no official position of ours.
  15. 0
    August 22 2016
    And Truzia immediately reminded about Incirlik
  16. +4
    August 22 2016
    Too early we make them all friends. They also wanted to build a canal there. Yes, you can't invest a penny there. In one word "partners" in the worst interpretation of the word.
    1. +2
      August 22 2016
      In friends list? Are you kidding, comrade?

      These chock fascists foam out of their mouths when they are reminded of the occupation of the USSR and England by their empire in the 40s of the last century.
      In friends list....
      They are more likely to join NATO than they will tolerate northerners.
    2. +1
      August 22 2016
      East - a delicate matter (s)
  17. +2
    August 22 2016
    The Persians were greatly offended by the fact that someone had dismissed their languages ​​ahead of time: such as we! yes from the Iranian base ...
    Although the agreement was in the process secret.
  18. 0
    August 22 2016
    Well, from the Iranian base, and what? Who cares, where did the bearded baksheesh come from? Oh barmaley just a light bulb.
  19. +1
    August 22 2016
    The media forgot how to read:
    look at https://ria.ru/world/20160822/1474937172.html
    "Under no circumstances will we provide the Russians with a military base. They didn’t come here forever", -
    we didn’t say that it was a military base wink
    1. 0
      August 22 2016
      And then it was worth opening his mouth and screaming all over the world. Now Iran’s if it was a one-time and secret operation
      1. Riv
        +1
        August 22 2016
        And who was yelling? Yellow media? Hamsters rejoiced - so this is their problem. They are always ready to jump.

        In fact, it is clear to anyone who can google the map that Hamadan can only be used as a jump airfield for strategic bombers. Syria is far from there, and even this, if the refueling in the air is worked out (and it worked out) is not critical. And it’s not a fact that the local runway is generally capable of normally accepting such aircraft.
        1. 0
          August 22 2016
          The first channel news release of 20 08 16 is your yellow press?
      2. 0
        August 22 2016
        Bathhouse.
        Get off!
  20. +2
    August 22 2016
    I don’t know, it looks like Western "partners" are passing off wishful thinking. Now neither Reuters, nor CNN can be trusted for a penny. Especially in such a matter as an air base in Iran! I can imagine what a shock the striped ears were when the 22nd from this base began to induce rustle. Let's wait for messages from our MO. So far, everyone says it as it is.
    1. +1
      August 22 2016
      "Now neither to Reiter, nor ..."
      And what, once it was possible?
      All the usual yellow press in a glossy cover.
  21. +3
    August 22 2016
    The Minister of Defense said: Iranian Minister of Defense Hossein Dehghan said Russia reported using Hamadan airbase without prior notice to Tehran. He said this in an interview with IRIB on Sunday, August 21, writes Mehr agency.
    The head of the department was asked why Iran was not the first to announce that Russian planes are now located at the airport. Dehgan replied: "First, Russia is interested in demonstrating that it is a superpower and can have a serious impact on security [in the region]."
    “Behind the disclosure of this information there is a disrespectful attitude and a desire to show off,” added the minister, quoted by the BBC Russian Service.

    Some kind of baby talk to God!
  22. 0
    August 22 2016
    It is not clear, it became scary from the Americans?
  23. +4
    August 22 2016
    The Persians (Iran), well, at least their elite, live on the idea of ​​their special mission. Here is the past and the spiritual center of all Shiites. In short, your cockroaches. There, Comrade Budyonny, at one time, kissed Comrade Mao Zedong, right on the podium, from an excess of feelings. And that’s all, kapets of Sino-Soviet friendship. And these, no less troubles. Really want to look wassat more impressive. East is a delicate matter. As soon as they understand that we need them, they begin to portray themselves as Persian virgins. And not the first time, already.
  24. +1
    August 22 2016
    Quote: guzik007
    The Persians were greatly offended by the fact that someone had dismissed their languages ​​ahead of time: such as we! yes from the Iranian base ...
    Although the agreement was in the process secret.

    I think it’s simpler, Iran is so loved in the Sunni world that for complete happiness they need: louging: they also need accusations of helping Allepo’s bombing reinforced by the corresponding shots of bloodied children.
    Would you keep your mouth shut - everything would be fine, but someone would like to boast;
  25. 0
    August 22 2016
    As I understand it, our politicians and Iranian chocks did not agree on the price.
    Media, of course, nothing to do with it - this is just an external background. If our warriors didn’t declare this, the imperialists would know about it in 2 hours and howl would raise.

    It is very likely that not very self-respecting descendants of the Persians naively believe that the Russians owe them something ....
  26. +1
    August 22 2016
    everyone wants to kick a wimp.
    1. +5
      August 22 2016
      I would minus you
      1. +6
        August 22 2016
        and I would have minced with a shovel ... winked
        1. 0
          August 22 2016
          I can imagine what the troll comments will look like now. Under them there will be a gauze of a dozen phrases like "minus you, bastard !!!" lol
          1. 0
            August 22 2016
            By the way, minus the globe.
    2. 0
      August 22 2016
      "Everyone wants to kick a weakling" - you seem to have been kicked 100 times already.
  27. +2
    August 22 2016
    Well, it was right that there was no need to take cock too early, they gave the base, so it was given for the cause, not paparasii !!
    1. 0
      August 22 2016
      and you too "tovarisch"
  28. 0
    August 22 2016
    Source mail.ru

    Source: RIA Novosti
    The decision to talk about using the base in the media without coordination with Iran was dictated by a "desire to show off," the minister said.
    “Of course, the Russians want to show that they are a superpower and an influential country, that they are active in the security sphere both in this region and in the world,” the minister said in an interview with the government’s “Second Channel” of Iran.
    “Behind the disclosure of this information is seen a disrespectful attitude and a desire to show off,” summed Dehgan.
    The Minister emphasized that at present no foreign military contingents are based in Iran, since this contradicts the country's constitution. Speaking about the use of the Hamadan base, the minister said that the need to provide a base for refueling Russian military aircraft was dictated by the fact that Russia decided to intensify military operations in Syria.
    The Russian Ministry of Defense said on August 16 that Russian bombers attacked Syrian territory from Iran for the first time. The military department called the base Hamadan "airfield basing."
    Information on the basing of Russian bombers in Iran has generated speculation about changing the configuration of forces in the Middle East. The US State Department spokesman said Russia’s use of the Iranian airfield is “sad, but not unexpected.”
    1. 0
      August 22 2016
      Well, more or less cleared up. Movements for internal use. We (i.e., Persians) are so independent that we cannot have bases for foreign military men. And we all are strangers who do not honor the twelve holy Shiite sheikhs. And the Russians flew to us to refuel. They are without nashensky kerasinu, well, just, not a single thing. Like camels in the Sahara without water.
  29. +2
    August 22 2016
    Interesting! Can I stand here again aside.
  30. +1
    August 22 2016
    Quote: Nross
    As I understand it, our politicians and Iranian chocks did not agree on the price.
    FROM...

    Maybe the next "Lavrov" called someone "damn stupid people", and they understood the Russian language and were offended.
  31. 0
    August 22 2016
    Alex777,
    Received a comment from our:
    We are free people, we go wherever we want, we walk on our own ...))))
    We are no longer there, but if we want, we will return. hi
  32. +1
    August 22 2016
    And what kind of suffering? Suspended does not mean stopped. And what three wonderful "enemas" are in the photo. A week of enema of partners ... went on. Their smelly reaction should have gone too. She went ... What, don't you feel?
  33. +1
    August 22 2016
    Quote: eugeniy.369
    There you are "Bloodsucker-lover to write curses and nonsense in a personal "link to the Russian resource
    https://lenta.ru/news/2016/08/22/iran_russia/
    .

    Is Lenta.ru a Russian resource? Would you still refer to the Echo of Moscow RBC or Rain referred laughing
    Tape. I lie rather Russian-speaking Jewish resource.
  34. +3
    August 22 2016
    Quote: atalef

    Would you keep your mouth shut - everything would be fine, but someone would like to boast;

    Well, atalef bullshit in the yard has long been the 21st century and all the secrets can be seen from orbit, some even at night and the Internet with telephony is read. So it was simply impossible to hide this and the point here is not boasting, we just showed that in some cases we can have bases in Iran and Iran itself is not against it.
    And this is a very good signal for the United States and other sponsors of terrorism like Israel.
  35. +1
    August 22 2016
    Lol, how much pathos there was when they announced that our strategists were so happy there, well, they were just so happy ...
    1. +1
      August 22 2016
      Laughing early.
      And where did you see pathos there?
  36. +1
    August 22 2016
    As far as we know, the Syrian government asked Iran to provide a base for our bombers. Another thing is surprising: but we and Iran concluded everything on oral agreements? Then it is not surprising that just 2 days ago the same Iranian Defense Minister spoke about an unlimited period and about the possibility of basing our aviation at other Iranian airfields ... And now he is pretending to be an "offended girl" and saying goodbye to Russia.
    In general, it is good if we ourselves voluntarily left there, rather than if we were asked to "get out" from there.
    Hamadan was a political PR campaign; there was little military benefit from him. From Khmeimim to any point in Syria is much closer than from Iran.
  37. +1
    August 22 2016
    According to Art. 176 of the Iranian Constitution, military contingents of foreign states cannot be located on the territory of the country. And already it was necessary to calm the raging deputies in the Mejlis. The fact is that since 1979 (since the Islamic Revolution) this article has never been violated.
    I believe that in this way we decided to remove the heated passions in Iran and beyond. Our media here also added fuel to the fire without a measure of PR at every corner. Now, one-time permits will be given as necessary, but this will no longer be a permanent placement and therefore will not be a violation of the Constitution. A forced step, but in this situation - the right one.
    In details here: http://www.iran.ru/news/analytics/101839/Rossiyskie_bombardirovshchiki_v_Hamada
    ne_ot_odobreniya_do_razdrazheniya
  38. +1
    August 22 2016
    It’s unfortunate, but this is a click on our nose. You can imagine their condition when we threw them from the S-300 at one time.
    1. +3
      August 22 2016
      The Iranians were offended that our VKS little support the work of their contingent in Syria, they had heavy losses, especially with their manner of fighting (Generals are in the front ranks, although Shiites, but Muslims, these first rows were mowed down quite a bit, naturally with loss of control of the armed formation ...). Maybe now they will start to take offense again. Persians, like Turkey, are also "Friends"
  39. +3
    August 22 2016
    Tehran explained why Russia hastened to announce the use of the Iranian airfield.
    The fact is that Moscow did this before the Islamic Republic, whose authorities now openly express their dissatisfaction with such publicity. They understand that military affairs do not like PR and advertising. That is why Iranian Minister of Defense Hossein Dehgan, unable to stand the molasses pouring from the Russian media, gently reproached Russia for its unceremoniousness, boasting and, in general, for disclosing information on the use of the Iranian air base. As the saying goes, sometimes it’s better to be silent than to speak, it would be more useful. In this case, show-offs prevailed over common sense.
  40. Don
    +2
    August 22 2016
    Quote: Denis Obukhov
    rather, this is a tactical move by Russia towards the United States showing that outside of Russia we can use other people's bases and we do not need to spend huge amounts of money on them constantly

    Yes Yes. Let us go to the base - Urya we are a superpower! They asked to get out - URYA we will save money! You yourself are not ashamed of such "logic"?
  41. +1
    August 22 2016
    Do not agree. Even at this level there are such mistakes.
  42. +2
    August 22 2016
    Quote: eugeniy.369
    Well, if they shuffle less all over the world, then the Persians for a solid bakshish (from the pocket of taxpayers, pensioners, state employees of the Russian Federation) will be allowed
    place aviation.

    And you do not count money, not in your pocket.
    You do not fuss trying to break our relationship with IRAN, this is not your business, too small.
    You count the money in the Knesset, it is more pleasant for you.
  43. +3
    August 22 2016
    Bloodsucker,
    Dear, could you make an effort on yourself and not be rude? And then you look like a puberty teenager
  44. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      August 22 2016
      Yes, it’s always like this - they’ll peck at any bullshit right away.
  45. +1
    August 22 2016
    Bloodsucker,
    How many people, so many opinions. And you always need to respect opponents. Even if you look at each other through sights.
  46. 0
    August 22 2016
    It’s not clear to me for what purpose it was necessary to reformat the site ?.
  47. The comment was deleted.
  48. The comment was deleted.
  49. The comment was deleted.
  50. The comment was deleted.
  51. +2
    August 22 2016
    Well, what kind of disgusting? I'm trying to respond to an earlier post, but the answer is at the end of the thread! The site is incredibly slow!
  52. The comment was deleted.
  53. 0
    August 22 2016
    A knife in the back from Iran? Persians are like that. Let's remember Griboyedov... Yes
    1. 0
      August 22 2016
      Quote: 16112014nk
      A knife in the back from Iran?

      everything is fine there Yes tongue
      screenshot of a comment from courage - a “short” translation of an interview with the Iranian Minister of Defense
      http://en.mehrnews.com/news/119130/Russia-announced-use-of-Hamedan-airbase-with
      out-prior-notice
  54. The comment was deleted.
  55. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      August 22 2016
      I updated the pages five times this way and that, but still no comments
      and then bam and there are already THREE of them am
      I’ve been a reader for a couple of days, it’s not clear to whom and how to write.
      I'll sit and read sad
  56. 0
    August 22 2016
    Now Iranian troops will be left without air cover.
  57. 0
    August 23 2016
    The Iranians have a lot of ambition, and a desire to cook up their own affairs at the expense of others.
  58. 0
    August 23 2016
    Yesterday, our Ministry of Defense responded to the statements of Iranian Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan, who yesterday, August 22, criticized Russia for the “ostentatious” announcement about the use of the air base in Hamadan: “Behind the disclosure of this information there appears to be a disrespectful attitude and a desire to show off”, said the Iranian minister. Well, the official representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense, Major General Igor Konashenkov, explained that the aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces, located at the Hamadan base in Iran, returned to their homeland after successfully completing their tasks. “Currently, all Russian Aerospace Forces aircraft involved in this operation are located on the territory of the Russian Federation.”
    What can I say? This is a direct consequence of the fact that the army and the defense-industrial complex are not managed by specialized specialists, but also specialists, but in the field of PR.
    If we were talking about carrying out some kind of combat mission, or even more so a strategic position for Russian long-range aviation, then all this should have been covered with a thick layer of state secrets! But there was no military need for this. If such a need had arisen, it would have been equally possible to place a jump airfield in Armenia, or use your own base in Khmeimim.
    But for the boys, show-off is above all else, which is what the Iranian minister drew attention to.
    And the fact that they violated the UN resolution on Iran is a total joke, and the clumsy excuses of our Foreign Ministry only indicate that the military did not consult with experts here either. And in general, the overseas deployment of “strategists” is nonsense, since their main weapons are nuclear, and keeping nuclear weapons in Iran could only occur to a very sick person... In general, the talkativeness of the department, which God himself ordered to be silent, is a separate issue. But now we have entire generals handling army PR! As, indeed, in other departments, like Markin from the Investigative Committee, where there are shoulder straps similar to those of a general.
    Well, if the general screws himself up, it’s like a general, on a grand scale.
    1. 0
      August 23 2016
      Demoniator
      You powerfully copy-paste fools.
      My minus would be a pleasure!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"