Henschel Hs-126 - "annoying crutch" in the service of the Luftwaffe

37
Many types of German aircraft on the Soviet-German front received characteristic nicknames from our soldiers. So, for example, the Ju-87 became a "bast shoe", the Fw-189 a "flying frame", the Bf-109 "thin". The Henschel Hs-126 we are considering was nicknamed by the Soviet soldiers the “annoying crutch” for its appearance and due to the fact that these machines were used as front-line spotters and close reconnaissance, their appearance meant in the near future either an artillery shelling or a strike aviation.

In the autumn of 1936, the first prototype of the Hs-126 took off, several pre-production copies were launched in 1937, and from January 1938 to January 1941 this aircraft was mass-produced at the Henschel-Werke plant, as well as at the AGO Flugzeugwerke enterprise. The Hs-126 was a double all-metal strut monoplane with non-retractable landing gear closed by fairing.




Hs-126 performs a reconnaissance mission during the French campaign 1940.


The purpose of creating this machine was to provide the Luftwaffe with a kind of universal aircraft to perform combat and non-combat functions. The main purpose of the Hs-126 was considered the role of a short-range reconnaissance and spotter, and, in fact, it was a new incarnation of the traditional observer aircraft already for the First World War. In order to create an excellent downward view, the wing was raised high above the level of the cockpit, and the cockpit itself was designed specifically for ease of observation. The aircraft as a whole was considered reliable and convenient for pilots (the same cockpit had glazing), easy to operate (in particular, flaps and ailerons were hydraulically boosted), and, most importantly, was able to operate from almost any runway (which was necessary for use as a communications aircraft).

It must be said that the Henschel company initially did not receive a state order for its production, and in 1937-1938 the aircraft was considered a civilian model, only in 1939 moving into the category of military vehicles. All of the above led to the weak armament of the Hs-126, which consisted of only two 7,92-mm machine guns: a fixed MG-17 in front of the pilot (ammunition 500 rounds) and an MG-15 at the back of the observer on a mobile installation (ammunition 975 rounds). . And although this aircraft developed, in general, a good speed in its class and for that time - up to 300-320 km / h, it had a short radius of action and could carry no more than 100 kg of bomb cargo (10 by 10 kg or 2 by 50 kg).


The layout of the tactical reconnaissance Hs-126.


After the adoption of this aircraft, the production of two modifications of the Hs-126A and Hs-126 B with more powerful engines (Bramo "Fafnir" and BMW-323, both 850 hp each) and with a variable pitch propeller was launched, which made it possible to increase speed up to 350-370 km/h. In addition, all military models of these aircraft were equipped with FuG-17 radios, which was necessary for the rapid transmission of reconnaissance and artillery correction data, as well as two cameras - a stationary one built into the fuselage, and a manual one used by an observer. Also, purely military modifications of the Hs-126 could carry a slightly larger load of bombs - up to 150 kg (1 x 50 kg and 10 x 10 kg), and armored backs (from 8 mm armor) were installed for the pilot and observer.

New modifications of the machine in question were produced only a year, from January 1940 to January 1941, but during this period 368 units were produced, whereas for the entire production time, 810 units to 913 units were assembled, which is quite a large number (of which AGO 430-483 unit.).

Henschel Hs-126 - "annoying crutch" in the service of the Luftwaffe

Hs-126 in flight over Germany.


The release of this, it must be said, little suitable for modern warfare even then in such a large number of aircraft, is rather difficult to explain (except as a corruption component or the action of hidden agents of influence). This fact looks especially strange against the background of a meager release (254 units) by the same Henschel company of such efficient, hard-to-kill and purely military-purpose vehicles as the Hs-123 (about which material has already been posted on Military Review).

Of course, we can say that factories produce what they can, but the situation looks very intriguing when the repeated requests of Wehrmacht and Luftwaffe officers to resume the production of vehicles of this type for the needs of the Eastern Front are rejected under various pretexts, and they continue to be delivered to combat units, in general , ineffective in combat and vulnerable Hs-126. In the Soviet Union of that time, such behavior was characterized by the definition of "sabotage", and entailed appropriate sanctions. And although the idea of ​​the “sabotage” activity of the Henschel concern in relation to the Third Reich is new to the Russian reader, the available facts allow us to assert this quite reasonably. Moreover, this was not some kind of fictitious "sabotage", which became the basis for many fabricated cases in the USSR, but a process of production of inefficient or unnecessarily difficult weapons to produce by a group of people.


Hs-126 in camouflage franco air forces of Spain.


The first combat use of several Hs-126s took place in Spain, where they were used as tactical reconnaissance and short-range bombers in the "Ausfklarungsgruppe 35", and where they received the code name "Super Pavo". They arrived there towards the end of the war, were not used in the conditions of enemy air supremacy and proved to be successful, although one machine was lost.

In the pre-war period, Henschel began actively exporting its “dual-use items” abroad: from 16 to 32, Hs-126 was sold to Greece, a few dozen to Bulgaria, Croatia and Estonia. In connection with the sale of the party Hs-126 to Greece, a funny episode happened, well illustrating the relationship between industrial capital and government bodies in the Third Reich.

The Greek government became interested in this versatile aircraft and signed a contract for the supply of 32 machines. The Henschel firm was already ready to send the first batch of 16 aircraft, but the Nazi government blocked the delivery of "dual-use equipment to a state that is not our ally." In response, the Henschel concern protested this decision, referring to the execution of the contract, and as a result, the parties came to a compromise: Berlin allowed the delivery, but forbade equipping the aircraft with weapons and communications equipment. In general, it is somehow difficult even to imagine that in the Stalinist USSR, for example, any aircraft factory on its own in 1939 would sell its combat aircraft to, say, Finland; The Kremlin forbids doing this; the concern protests this decision and executes the delivery, simply not putting weapons on the aircraft (analogues of which the buyer easily installs on his own upon receipt of the machines). Thus, the above example shows quite clearly that the Nazi government had to take into account the interests of industrial capital, and industrial concerns had a fairly large freedom of action and could influence government decisions.

Ironically, soon the Greek "Henschels" as light bombers and reconnaissance aircraft acted against the Italian (autumn-winter 1940) and against the German troops (spring 1941), and the Bulgarian, Croatian and German Hs-126 fought against the Greek forces. This once again suggests that in the leadership of the Henschel concern (by the way, it successfully survived the war and still exists today), not everyone sympathized with the Nazis, and this industrial association pursued at least an ambiguous policy under the Nazi regime.


A comic picture of his participation in the Polish campaign by a German observer pilot from the Hs-126 crew.


In Germany itself, by the beginning of World War II (on 01.09.1939), the Hs-126 was the backbone of the reconnaissance units of the Luftwaffe - the 29 squadrons of this model were armed with 23 (267 Hs-126 were in combat units, of which 234 were combat-ready). However, starting from the Polish campaign, these relatively low-speed and, in general, vulnerable aircraft sustained heavy losses (on average, up to 30% of the number of units involved). So, in the skies over Poland, 25 Hs-126 was lost, including 16 was shot down by fighters, and 40 machines of this type were heavily damaged.

The fate of the small lot in 7 Hs-126, which were sold to Estonia, is unknown exactly. After Estonia became part of the USSR, these vehicles were transferred to the 22 of the territorial rifle corps of the Red Army, and, apparently, were partially destroyed when the German aircraft struck at their home base, and were partially shot down in the air.


Hs-126 in summer camouflage.


After participating in campaigns against France and in the Balkans, most of the tactical reconnaissance squadrons armed with the Hs-126 took part in Operation Barbarossa, and one squadron was transferred to North Africa with E. Rommel's corps. In total, on 01.06.1941/602/126, the Luftwaffe, including flight schools and rear units, included 1941 Hs-01.03.1942. However, due to their high vulnerability, since the summer of 35, these aircraft have been gradually withdrawn from combat units, reorienting themselves to solving auxiliary tasks. True, this was a gradual process - since as early as 16/126/126 on the Eastern Front, out of 1941 short-range reconnaissance units, XNUMX were still flying Hs-XNUMX. Thus, one should not assume that the Luftwaffe forces that attacked the USSR consisted entirely of aircraft of the most modern types; there were many obsolete vehicles among them, and, for example, the Hs-XNUMX became one of those models of equipment that the Germans were forced to withdraw from the front line already starting in XNUMX.


Hs-126, shot down on the territory of Ukraine.


To show the level of losses that these aircraft suffered on the Soviet-German front, let's say that in just 1 day - 22.06.1941/13/126 - 1941 Hs-381s were shot down and several dozen damaged, and in December 1941 the number of lost aircraft of this type increased to 126 units Already from the end of the summer of 1, 2-109 Bf-4s were necessarily allocated to escort the Hs-126. Later, the number of escort fighters reached a whole link of XNUMX vehicles, but this also did not work - these slow-moving vehicles one way or another became a "bait" for Soviet fighters, even outdated brands, and escort fighters often used the current situation not to protect their reconnaissance at any cost , but to build up a personal score of victories (despite the fact that the vulnerable Hs-XNUMX was often shot down too).

From the autumn of 1941 and, especially, from the spring-summer of 1942, their functions as scouts were transferred to the Fw-189 everywhere, and the Henschels remaining on the Eastern Front were gradually transferred to night light bomber aviation units or to flight schools. Yes, yes, following the example of the Air Force of the Red Army Luftwaffe on the Eastern Front, squadrons of light night bombers were created from obsolete types of aircraft, the use of which during the day was associated with high losses. As you can see, the Germans did not shy away from borrowing useful tactical novelties from the enemy.


The Hs-126 tows a cargo glider.


Note that these aircraft played an important role during the air supply operation for the encircled German group near the city of Kholm, which took place from January 21 to May 5, 1942. This was the first and successfully completed operation of this kind for the Wehrmacht on the Eastern Front (and this will become along with other factors, one of the conditions for the formation of the Stalingrad pocket, when the Germans presumptuously decide that they will again be successfully supplied from the air). In the course of carrying out tasks to ensure the surrounded formations of the Wehrmacht, the Hs-126 not only took up to 200 kg of cargo, but was also used as a tug of small transport gliders.


Hs-126 in the winter camouflage of the Eastern Front.


On the Eastern Front 01.09.1942, it still remained in the 103 Hs-126 Luftwaffe combat units, mainly in the night light bomber units. Some of these machines were used from the fall of the 1942 to the spring of the 1943 as light supply aircraft and tugs of small cargo gliders.

However, perhaps the most famous operation in which the Hs-126 played an important role was already carried out when these slow aircraft were withdrawn from the front. We are talking about the famous raid of the German special forces, carried out on September 12, 1943 in order to release the arrested Benito Mussolini. It was these aircraft that reconnoitred the landing site and were used as tugs of transport gliders with Nazi soldiers who attacked a secluded villa where the Italian dictator was kept under arrest.


Several Hs-126 on the airfield.


As of 01.03.1944/174/126, there were still 13 Hs-11s in the Luftwaffe, some of which were in service with the following combat squadrons on the Eastern Front: 2./NSGr-12 based in Estonia, 2./NSGr-7 based in Lithuania and 126./NSGr-XNUMX based in the Balkans. At that time, these aircraft were used at the front as night light bombers. Behind the front line, in the German rear, the Hs-XNUMX was used as day light bombers and reconnaissance aircraft to fight partisans, as well as communications aircraft, in which role they served until the end of the war.

Summing up, we can say that the Hs-126, although it firmly occupied its niche in the initial period of World War II, was easy to manufacture, reliable and maintainable, but in general it did not represent anything outstanding, and already in 1942 it was launched for supporting roles. However, in the period from the summer of 1941 to the autumn of 1942, as a tactical reconnaissance and artillery spotter, he still managed to earn his unpleasant nickname from our soldiers, and then for another two years the Henschels disturbed the Soviet formations at night and harmed the partisans.


Hs-126 in winter camouflage from night light bomber squadron, shot down on the territory of the USSR.


It can be said that the adoption of the Hs-126 by the Luftwaffe was some forced and relatively unsuccessful attempt to use a dual-purpose aircraft (before the famous Fw-189 appeared in sufficient numbers). But one way or another, the advanced units of the Wehrmacht at the initial stage of World War II had these nimble tactical scouts in front of them, informing their commanders about the enemy and coordinating the fire of German artillery and the actions of attack aircraft. True, these were rather slow-moving and vulnerable vehicles, which the ground units of the enemy tried to shoot down in the first place, and, unlike the invulnerable Fw-189, this was usually quite easy to do.

Several copies of the Hs-126 of varying degrees of preservation have reached our time, including at least one flying model, sometimes used for air shows in the UK. Despite the fact that the absolute majority of Hs-126 was shot down over the territory of the former USSR, in our country, unfortunately, not a single more or less of a whole copy of this aircraft remained.
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    22 August 2016 06: 21
    Hs-126 is in many ways an analogue of our Po-2, which only had the best means of communication. I remember Pokryshkin wrote it on his account one of the first.
    Thank you for the article.
    1. 0
      22 August 2016 16: 01
      Only our maize was very easy to manufacture, though LTX was more likely to cause laughter even for the 30's.
  2. +9
    22 August 2016 06: 53
    In principle, Henschel as a communication aircraft, and a short-range reconnaissance spotter is quite suitable. How "outdated" it is - all-metal, with a powerful engine. Military modification - speed over 350 km / h. If you remember what were in service with the Red Army - TB-1, TB-3, U-2 and others with speeds up to 250 km / h and many are made of wood and canvas, then the Non-126 looks good. hi
    1. 0
      22 August 2016 14: 32
      But our "u-dvases" could be made at any furniture factory, by unskilled personnel (by the forces of the same teenagers), and at the same time done in hundreds, because the cost of production is penny - no strategic raw materials were required.
    2. 0
      22 August 2016 17: 58
      Good day ! Everything is simple here - against the background of other Luftwaffe combat aircraft, the Hs-126 looks squalid.
  3. +1
    22 August 2016 07: 29
    very interesting, waiting for an article about Hs129
    1. +1
      22 August 2016 12: 31
      https://topwar.ru/75545-shturmovik-hs-129.html
    2. +5
      22 August 2016 17: 59
      Don’t worry, I’m preparing a lot of material about the actions of the German attack aircraft, then we will get to the Hs-129.
  4. +2
    22 August 2016 07: 35
    "The process of release of ineffective, or unnecessarily complicated weapons in production, quite consciously realized by a group of people."
    "was easy to manufacture, reliable and maintainable device"

    I did not understand, Hs-126, according to the author, was simple or difficult to manufacture aircraft? request
    1. The comment was deleted.
  5. +6
    22 August 2016 07: 44
    "Henschel-126" was never an easy prey for our fighters, it was quite difficult to shoot it down - low speed, good maneuverability, ability to camouflage the terrain.
    The release of these aircraft in large numbers as a result of the activities of agents of influence, as the author of the article suggested, is wrong, in my opinion. The plane was fully consistent with the tasks that it solved.
    1. +2
      22 August 2016 08: 49
      I totally agree. With the same success, those who produced U2 (Po2) can be recorded as pests. Henschel’s full analogue on our part, except that the technological level is much lower.
    2. 0
      22 August 2016 08: 49
      I totally agree. With the same success, those who produced U2 (Po2) can be recorded as pests. Henschel’s full analogue on our part, except that the technological level is much lower.
    3. 0
      22 August 2016 18: 03
      Quote: bober1982
      "Henschel-126" was never an easy prey for our fighters, it was quite difficult to shoot it down - low speed, good maneuverability, ability to camouflage the terrain.
      The release of these aircraft in large numbers as a result of the activities of agents of influence, as the author of the article suggested, is wrong, in my opinion. The plane was fully consistent with the tasks that it solved.

      The thing is that he was weak as a tactical reconnaissance (Fw-189 was MUCH better in everything) and no close bomber.

      And it was easy to bring him down - why it was probably the ONLY Luftwaffe aircraft that was withdrawn from combat units by the end of the 1941 of the year.
      1. +1
        22 August 2016 18: 35
        Why did they get that he was taken out of combat units by 1941? the aircraft was used until the end of the war, by 1941. it was discontinued.
        In my opinion, it is inappropriate to compare the Hs-126 with the "frame" or bombers. All these aircraft solved different tasks.
        This is the same as saying - Po-2 as a bomber was very weak.
        And about the fact that knocking Henschel was easy, it’s you who got excited.
      2. 0
        22 November 2020 12: 10
        Ratnik2015, you are writing nonsense.
        About the fact that the company "Henschel" did not receive an order for these aircraft initially - nonsense! This machine was created according to the official requirements of the General Staff and fully satisfied them, surpassing in a number of parameters similar aircraft of other countries.
        What you write about the loss of these machines is a lie!
        No 25 Hs126 was lost over Poland!
        On June 22, 1941, 13 Hs126 were also NOT shot down. So far, there are confirmations of only three irretrievably lost aircraft that day.
        Hs126 was not withdrawn from combat units by the end of 1941!
        These aircraft were used as reconnaissance aircraft even in the summer of 1943 at the Kursk Bulge.
    4. 0
      23 August 2016 10: 12
      Quote: bober1982
      Why did they get that he was taken out of combat units by 1941? the aircraft was used until the end of the war, by 1941. it was discontinued.
      In my opinion, it is inappropriate to compare the Hs-126 with the "frame" or bombers. All these aircraft solved different tasks. It's like saying - Po-2 as a bomber was very weak. And about the fact that it was easy to shoot down Henschel, you got excited.
      Apparently you inattentively read the material, everything is described in detail there. From the front-line units of the Luftwaffe - and especially from the role of a tactical reconnaissance aircraft - this aircraft began to be withdrawn back in 41 (which the Germans did not do for any other machine), in 1942 this process ended. And the Hs-126 began to be used exclusively deep in the rear, behind the front line or as a night bomber, and then rarely.

      And the fact that Po-2 was like a weak bomber is debatable. The Germans apparently not just created night light bomber squadrons from the Hs-126.

      Hs-126 losses were huge for the Eastern Front (which was considered the weakest of the theater of operations in terms of enemy forces in the air), this was the unanimous opinion of the Luftwaffe officers, which led to the withdrawal of these aircraft from the role of tactical reconnaissance.

      In fact, a civilian aircraft can be said, without armor, not very fast, not high-altitude ... It could be easily shot down on any even outdated Soviet fighter.
      1. 0
        23 August 2016 11: 03
        I won’t argue, we won’t argue with each other. I’m curious how you rate the Hs-129, apparently you won’t leave a living spot from the plane, I'm waiting for your article.
  6. +1
    22 August 2016 08: 51
    Quote: svp67
    Hs-126 is in many ways an analogue of our Po-2, which only had the best means of communication. I remember Pokryshkin wrote it on his account one of the first.
    Thank you for the article.

    And what is the analogue? 2 times faster, more powerful, larger in size, made of metal, more armed.


    The analogue is Storch
    1. +3
      22 August 2016 09: 25
      An analogue of application in the first place. Both aircraft solved approximately the same tasks, although technically our P5 is probably closer to Henschel.
      1. 0
        22 August 2016 10: 32
        Yes, they have nothing in common, neither technically, nor operationally, nor conceptually, well, Ar-68 or хш51 and then with a stretch ...

    2. +4
      22 August 2016 12: 39
      Of course not an analog. He raised twice as many bombs as 2, had the skill of a silent flight and stood like a garden bench, therefore it was issued by tens of thousands. And this is a miracle of the gloomy Teutonic genius - a perfectly meaningless plane. As a scout, he succumbed to the frame, as a bomber to everyone else, like a messenger plane to a storm.
      1. +2
        22 August 2016 20: 40
        Well, about the fact that the 2 software raised 2 times as many bombs, it’s unlikely. Its standard 150 load is 200 kg, isolated cases of overloading up to 400 kg have been noted, but this is only with an absolutely new motor and perfect piloting. Well, in terms of manufacturability, the 2 naturally surpassed that German, and our maize rotated aerobatics.
  7. +4
    22 August 2016 10: 26
    I looked at the statistics of downed Henschelles-126 by our aces.
    Hero of the Soviet Union Mikhail Dmitrievich Baranov shot down four planes, no one achieved a better result than he did. Everyone noted that it was difficult to shoot down.
    The Germans were experienced, often imitated that they were shot down - randomly fell during an attack, leveled off the ground and safely left.
  8. +7
    22 August 2016 15: 34
    In response, the Henschel concern protested this decision, referring to the execution of the contract, and as a result, the parties came to a compromise: Berlin allowed the delivery, but forbade equipping the aircraft with weapons and communications equipment. In general, it is somehow difficult even to imagine that in the Stalinist USSR, for example, any aircraft factory on its own in 1939 would sell its combat aircraft to, say, Finland; The Kremlin forbids doing this; the concern protests this decision and executes the delivery, simply not putting weapons on the aircraft (analogues of which the buyer easily installs on his own upon receipt of the machines).


    This is not at all surprising - it is normal practice that private firms protest the actions of the authorities.
    This Soviet Union created state enterprises that were extremely inefficient by the standards of private capital, but able to concentrate a significant labor resource in the right place at the right time.

    Speaking of dual-use products:
    In the 2000s, it was forbidden to export some types of construction equipment (such as a motor grader) from Russia, since, according to the law, this equipment fell into a number of "dual-use" equipment! - It turns out they can create anti-tank escarps, profile ditches.
    I don’t know who the brainy state official was, filling this list, but because of such idiots, many demanded types of equipment were not sold, which affected many industries. Moreover, the export of equipment was prohibited even to Kazakhstan - a partner in the CIS!
    Subsequently, this technique was already in little demand - due to the complete obsolescence and filling the CIS market with competitive products from other countries.
  9. 0
    22 August 2016 18: 00
    Quote: Vladimirets
    [b] I still do not understand, Hs-126, according to the author, was a simple or difficult to manufacture aircraft? request

    It was relatively easy to manufacture by plane, but absolutely not needed in the upcoming war. And other Henschel military products were initially overly technological and expensive to manufacture.
  10. +3
    22 August 2016 18: 27
    Quote: Kenneth
    Of course not an analog. He raised twice as many bombs as 2, had the skill of a silent flight and stood like a garden bench, therefore it was issued by tens of thousands. And this is a miracle of the gloomy Teutonic genius - a perfectly meaningless plane. As a scout, he succumbed to the frame, as a bomber to everyone else, like a messenger plane to a storm.

    And we have most types of weapons at times cheaper than the Germans had. Moreover, this price is not in money, but in resources. The production of one combat aircraft in the USSR took several times less than the cost of electricity, machine and labor resources. The same for tanks, artillery, small arms. In many respects, this is why they won. Ours were able to establish a mass production of relatively inexpensive and at the same time effective weapons, but the Germans did not. And in this case it is impossible to talk about hard labor in the rear. The Germans had slaves.
    1. 0
      22 August 2016 20: 54
      They exported slaves to themselves from the eastern temporarily occupied territories, and the Czechs with great care made them not only armored vehicles and weapons, but also Me-262 at the end of the war.
    2. 0
      23 August 2016 10: 02
      Quote: Yakut
      Ours were able to establish mass production of relatively inexpensive and at the same time effective weapons, but the Germans did not. And in this case it is impossible to talk about hard labor in the rear. The Germans were just slaves.
      More precisely, their bet on high-class but overly technological and therefore relatively small quantitative weapons turned out to be a bit. Well, knowing about industrial production in the USSR during the Second World War, it is quite possible to talk about the forced use of forced labor (not to mention prisoners), even if it was not framed as direct slavery in Germany.
  11. 0
    22 August 2016 23: 45
    Here, curious people can get acquainted with the characteristics of the LNB http://warstar.info/soviet_vvs_2_world_war/u2.html
    That is, the U-2 in the version of a light night bomber. I especially pay attention to the ceiling and rate of climb - 0 m/s. I have rounded this up. To be honest, it's creepy. That is, the plane with the maximum bomb load could barely stay in the air. So this Henschel compared to the U-07 is like a Rolls-Royce compared to a scooter. By the way, what could be the losses of an aircraft constantly hanging over the front line? The correct answer is big. Although the frame, of course, was much better, but also more expensive. By the way, the IL-2 also had large losses, not because the plane was very bad, but because it was all the time over the front. But at least they were afraid of the IL-2, but they simply did not like this Henschel. Hanging, you know .... and itching over your head. Of course, you want to smack out of something.
    1. 0
      23 August 2016 10: 06
      Quote: Dekabrev
      So this Henschel compared to the U-2 is like a Rolls-Royce compared to a scooter. By the way, what could be the losses of an aircraft constantly hanging over the front line? The correct answer is big. Although the frame, of course, was much better, but also more expensive. By the way, the IL-2 also had large losses, not because the plane was very bad, but because it was all the time over the front. But at least they were afraid of the IL-2, but they simply did not like this Henschel. Hanging, you know .... and itching over your head. Of course, you want to smack out of something.
      You probably looked through the material too quickly. Firstly, Hs-126 does not go compared to Po-2, it is more than Storch.

      But this is not Rolls-Royce, here Fw-189 (you can read my material about it) - was an order of magnitude superior. And these aircraft suffered moderate losses, while Henschel was very easy prey.

      Well and still - IL-2 was, as it were softer to put it, well, not the best plane. Hence the loss. But it turned out to be optimal for the needs of the front and, most importantly, for Soviet wartime industry.
      1. +1
        23 August 2016 22: 39
        Well, I didn’t start comparing the Henschel with the U-2. And these comparisons surprised me, to put it mildly. So I wrote that you can compare them just like a Rolls-Royce with a scooter. Naturally I exaggerate. And the fact that the frame is better, I also wrote this. And the IL-2 was precisely balanced. And there is little sense from an aircraft that is not balanced for the needs of the front. By the way, an alternative to a flying armored car in the west was heavy fighters with missile weapons, so as not to climb with their bombs on anti-aircraft guns at low level, but they also had problems with accuracy. When Rudel spoke to American pilots, shared his experience, they wondered what he could teach them. After all, they were not going to bomb or shoot from machine guns at targets on the ground. They had missile weapons for this. But Rudel could not tell anything about the use of missiles. He wrote about this exchange of experience in his memoirs. By the way, here many are carried out on the IL-2. Can anyone name a better stormtrooper? Not a bomber, but an attack aircraft for working on columns, railway stations and other small targets and not carpet bombing. The Americans and the British had a huge superiority over the Germans in the air at the end of the war, they were strangled in numbers, but even they themselves cannot say that their assault strikes were distinguished by jewelry accuracy. They themselves told how they sometimes worked out in their own way. Yu-87 was very good in terms of bombing accuracy, but completely defenseless. Which plane was like an attack aircraft head and shoulders above the IL-2?
      2. 0
        23 August 2016 22: 39
        Well, I didn’t start comparing the Henschel with the U-2. And these comparisons surprised me, to put it mildly. So I wrote that you can compare them just like a Rolls-Royce with a scooter. Naturally I exaggerate. And the fact that the frame is better, I also wrote this. And the IL-2 was precisely balanced. And there is little sense from an aircraft that is not balanced for the needs of the front. By the way, an alternative to a flying armored car in the west was heavy fighters with missile weapons, so as not to climb with their bombs on anti-aircraft guns at low level, but they also had problems with accuracy. When Rudel spoke to American pilots, shared his experience, they wondered what he could teach them. After all, they were not going to bomb or shoot from machine guns at targets on the ground. They had missile weapons for this. But Rudel could not tell anything about the use of missiles. He wrote about this exchange of experience in his memoirs. By the way, here many are carried out on the IL-2. Can anyone name a better stormtrooper? Not a bomber, but an attack aircraft for working on columns, railway stations and other small targets and not carpet bombing. The Americans and the British had a huge superiority over the Germans in the air at the end of the war, they were strangled in numbers, but even they themselves cannot say that their assault strikes were distinguished by jewelry accuracy. They themselves told how they sometimes worked out in their own way. Yu-87 was very good in terms of bombing accuracy, but completely defenseless. Which plane was like an attack aircraft head and shoulders above the IL-2?
  12. 0
    22 August 2016 23: 52
    By the way, in some recommendations for do-it-yourselfers, I remember it was written that, in order to ensure flight safety, climb rate, preferably, should not be less than 3 m / s.
  13. +1
    26 August 2016 01: 26
    It seems that some authors try to sit on two chairs: both "annoying" and "unsuccessful".
    The term "annoying" in relation to an enemy aircraft is very Russian. Translated into normal Russian, this is an effective, and therefore dangerous type of military equipment. The "crutch" was effective not on its own, but as a necessary element of the operational control of ground forces, in particular, target designation ("damn fingers"). This method was not used by our troops, but this does not mean at all that it was ineffective, on the contrary, judging by the memoirs, the appearance of a "crutch" usually promised big problems and losses.
    As for the combat losses of such aircraft, which acted directly over the battlefield, I note that this happens in war, and often.
  14. 0
    31 October 2016 17: 43
    A little-known plane - thanks for the article .... and in its role it was quite applicable ... the main visibility is good and maneuverability
  15. 0
    29 November 2016 09: 47
    as Rokossovsky recalled ... "near Smolensk, reconnaissance aircraft were constantly hanging in the air, as soon as one left for a refueling or with a stake in the ground, his place was immediately taken by another"
  16. 0
    16 December 2016 21: 04
    Russian specialists in the manufacture of everything from a needle to a thermonuclear bomb know all the qualities of an object. Stalin was not lucky, he died before they were born.