Bal-E coastal anti-ship complex

42


The coastal missile system (DBK) "Bal-E" is intended for: control of territorial waters and torrential zones; protection of naval bases, other coastal facilities and coastal infrastructure; protect the coast on landing-dangerous directions.

Combat use of the complex is provided in simple and complex weather conditions day and night with full autonomy of targeting after launching into enemy fire and electronic countermeasure conditions.

DB Bal-E is a mobile (based on the MAZ 7930 chassis) system, which consists of: self-propelled command and control and communications centers (SKPUS) - up to 2 units; self-propelled launchers (SPU) - up to 4 units, carrying anti-ship missiles (ASM) of type X-35E (3М-24E) in transport-launch containers (TPK). On the standard version of the SPU is 8 TPK. transport and handling machines (TPM), designed to form a repeated salvo - up to 4 units.

The command and control center provides target reconnaissance, target designation and optimal target distribution between launchers. The presence of active and passive high-precision radar target detection channels as part of a complex allows for a flexible strategy for detecting targets, including secretive ones. Launchers and TPM can be placed in hidden positions in the depth of the coastline. At the same time, the secrecy of combat positions and the presence of artificial and natural obstacles in the direction of firing do not limit the combat use of the complex.

Shooting can be conducted with single missiles or a volley from any launcher. It is possible to obtain operational information from other command posts and external means of reconnaissance and target designation. A volley complex can include up to 32 missiles. Such a volley is capable of disrupting the performance of the combat mission of a large shipboard attack group, airborne detachment, or enemy convoy. The presence of the TPM in the complex allows you to re-launch a volley in 30-40 minutes. The combat management system of the complex’s facilities is implemented using digital methods for transmitting all types of messages, using automated communication systems, processing messages, and classifying information with guaranteed durability.



The presence of night vision devices, navigation equipment, topographic referencing and orientation allows the complex to quickly change starting positions after completing a combat mission, as well as redeploy to a new combat area. The deployment time of the complex in a new position is 10 minutes. Formation of a coastal defense system based on the Bal-E ballistic missile system in combination with the use of the unified Kh-35E anti-ship missiles (3M-24E) on patrol ships in the near sea zone equipped with Uran-E missile systems and on aviation combat complexes, is able to ensure the solution of operational and tactical tasks with minimal economic costs by building a unified system for the operation and repair of anti-ship missiles.

The tasks of creating defensive systems for important coastal zones, port facilities, naval military bases, and other coastal territories were set and solved from time immemorial. We can recall examples from stories naval fleets of the past and the previous century, when such systems were created on the basis of developed fortifications and equipped with powerful artillery installations.

However, for modern means of destruction, which are based on high-precision weaponsuch systems are very vulnerable, and therefore they are a thing of the past. Today, they are being replaced by mobile defense systems, which, from an unexpected direction, can deliver an accurate and massive strike on enemy ships and, in a short time, having changed their position, be again ready to launch a striking strike. The coastal missile system "Bal-E", designed to control pouring zones and territorial waters, protect naval bases, coastal targets and coastal sections, belongs to such systems. It has high mobility, necessary power and accuracy of destruction. It consists of a self-propelled command and control and communications center (SKPUS), a self-propelled launcher (SPU), carrying anti-ship missiles in transport and launch containers, and a transport and reloading machine to form a re-salvo.

It is no secret that when changing the firing position most of the time is spent on referencing to the terrain, to determine their coordinates in a new place. Night vision devices, navigation equipment, topographic reference and orientation allow the complex to quickly prepare for the combat mission. The deployment time of the Bal-E in the new position is 10 minutes.

Bal-E coastal anti-ship complex


When operating on light-tonnage ships, firing can be done by single missiles. It is clear that during operations on large ships (such as a destroyer, etc.), launching a single missile against such an enemy will not make any special changes in its combat capabilities. The designers tried to make life as difficult as possible for the potential adversary. The fire salvo of the Bal-E complex can make up to 32 (!) Missiles with a launch interval of no more than 3 seconds, and given the maximum ammunition load, up to 64 rockets! In short, the adversary will need to think hard before entering into combat with such a complex.

In addition, the complex has a number of other advantages, allowing it to withstand a wide class of enemy maritime attack weapons. Centralized firing control, carried out by SKPS, provides target designation and optimal distribution of targets between SPU. At the same time, high-precision radar detection channels operating in active and passive modes make it possible to secretly find, classify, and accompany marine surface targets, including against the background of active and passive interference.

It is possible to obtain operational information from other command posts, reconnaissance and target designation. In other words, "Bal-E" can act as an independent combat unit, as well as be part of a centralized defense system.

The complex uses the X-35E anti-ship missile (ASM) (3М-24E), which is a unified guided missile, which, in addition to the Bal-E mobile coastal missile systems, can be equipped with Uran-E missile systems, combat aircraft complexes tactical and naval aviation, as well as search and patrol aircraft and helicopters. RCC is designed to destroy surface warships with a displacement of up to 5.000 tons and sea transports.

Main tactical and technical characteristics
Range of destruction, km to 120
Remoteness of the starting position from the coastline, km to 10
The number of missiles on each SPU and SST to 8
Missile launch interval in salvo, s. no more than 3
Maximum speed of the movement, km / h:
- on the highway 60
- off road 20
Missile launch mass, kg ~ 620
Total complex ammunition, the number of missiles to 64
Power reserve (without refueling), km at least 850

The X-35E rocket (3М-24E) can be used in simple and complex meteorological conditions, day and night, under fire and electronic countermeasures of the enemy. Small dimensions, extremely low altitude of the flight path, as well as a special guidance algorithm that ensures maximum secrecy of the use of an active homing head by a rocket, cause a low level of visibility of the rocket.



In the Bal-E complex, the X-35E (3М-24E) missiles are housed in sealed transport and launch containers, which ensure high reliability of the complexes in difficult climatic conditions with a low level of labor costs for their maintenance.

Bal-E and X-35E (3М-24E) are export options. The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will receive them not only without this index, but with several other possibilities, which are too early to talk about. According to Interfax-AVN, state testing of the complex was completed in 2004 year. As the head of the Directorate of orders and deliveries of ships, naval armaments and military equipment of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Rear Admiral Anatoly Shlemov, explained, now the Ball complex is undergoing a corresponding clearance. The new equipment will go into service with the coastal forces of all four fleets.
Rocket bastion

In October, the 2004 of the year passed state tests and will soon enter into service the Russian Navy's newest mobile coastal missile system "Ball". It is based on the X-35 Uran missiles. Modern equipment and digital equipment allow you to deploy the complex in a new position in just 10 minutes. Several high-speed computers provide calculation for several solutions of a combat mission at once and recommend the most optimal one. With just one salvo from the 32-x missiles, the complex is capable of destroying the enemy carrier grouping or connecting enemy assault ships located at distances from 7 to 130 kilometers from the coast.

Within half an hour, having changed position, the Ball can launch a second missile strike. This complex is also unique in that its missiles can be used both from the shore, and from a fighter, and from a helicopter. "Ball" will replace those operated by navy more than 30 years of the Redut and Boundary systems. This film will tell about how the Coastal Missile Forces developed, starting from the second half of the 20th century. Viewers will recognize the names of the creators of the first stationary and mobile coastal systems from the ICB Raduga, NPO Mashinostroyeniya, as well as the current Tactical Missile Corporation.

42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    31 August 2013 08: 55
    "Ball", and it’s not time for you to "tour" to Syria ... Moreover, you are with the letter "E", which means "export" ...
    1. +14
      31 August 2013 10: 45
      The range is not enough. If only the Israeli utensils trivia shoot like that. It is relevant in the Caspian and in minor conflicts. Against serious opponents, the range is not enough. And so, of course, you need a thing.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  2. +1
    31 August 2013 09: 04
    Uh ... I do not quite understand where in this complex the butterfly valve is?
    "The barrel is locked with a traditional rotary bolt, which has 7 lugs, behind the receiver liner. The bolt carrier moves inside the receiver on two guide rods, without touching the walls, the return spring is located in the middle between the rods and above them."
    1. ramsi
      +1
      31 August 2013 09: 15
      yes yes it's a cool joke
  3. +3
    31 August 2013 09: 10
    For the Strait of Hormuz, that’s it. And about locking the trunk, of course, it's cool, from another topic, like it probably stuck.
  4. +1
    31 August 2013 09: 13
    Range of defeat - 120 km.

    Why so little?

    It seemed to me that coastal missile systems should reach at least 300 km ...
    1. +4
      31 August 2013 09: 24
      Quote: Enot-poloskun
      It seemed to me that coastal missile systems should reach at least 300 km ...
      Because everyone has their own task - from which line to attack the enemy and who. There is an operational-tactical SCRC "Bastion", with "Yakhants" with a range of about 600 km. There is "Club-M" with a range of up to 300 km. Accordingly and subordination they will be "frontline", "army", "divisional ...."
      1. -9
        31 August 2013 13: 24
        And there is a tomahawk with a range of more than 1000 km., Which, as it were, hints that our coastal complexes are still able to repel only the invasion of poachers.
        1. beard999
          +1
          31 August 2013 15: 07
          Quote: Tu-214P
          tomahawk with a range of over 1000 km

          RCC, in addition to coastal SCRC, are placed on aircraft carriers, on NK and submarines. The line of defense can be from the coastline and beyond 1000 km. The range of Russian anti-ship missiles is 3M45 (550-600 km), 3M55 (over 400 km), 3M54 (375 km), X-59MK (285 km), 3M24M1 (260 km), X-31A (160 km), according to any allow the enemy’s AUG to come close to the territorial waters of the Russian Federation. In naval aviation, the combat radius of action is quite limited (for example, in F / A-18E, when working on the ground, only about 700 km).
        2. teleset
          +2
          31 August 2013 15: 22
          this is the catch that the tamahawk can fly both 2500km and up to 4000km. Now, if we had missiles at such a range DASTION WITH YACHANTS, then the United States would not have placed its destroyers near Syria. BUT, the problem here seems to be different: there is an agreement on not using medium-range missiles, we need to get out of it.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +1
            31 August 2013 20: 37
            Quote: teleset
            this is the catch that the tamahawk can fly both 2500km and up to 4000km. Now, if we had missiles at such a range DASTION WITH YACHANTS, then the United States would not have placed its destroyers near Syria. BUT, the problem here seems to be different: there is an agreement on not using medium-range missiles, we need to get out of it.

            There's actually about ballistic missiles ...
          4. beard999
            +3
            1 September 2013 14: 10
            Quote: teleset
            then a tamahawk can fly both 2500km and up to 4000km

            KR "Tomahawk", with a range of 4000 km, is not in service with the US Navy. The Americans had a Kyrgyz Republic with a range of 3000 km - AGM-129A. But, firstly, it is an air-based missile defense system, and secondly, the Americans destroyed the last of them in April 2012. The range of 2500 km was in the KR type “Tomahawk” modification RGM / UGM-109A with SBN, which were purchased back in the mid 80-ies. Most of them were converted by Americans into conventional RGM / UGM-109C / D modifications with launch ranges, depending on warhead type, from 870 to 1700 km. The rest of the U.S. KR, with MSS and a range of 2500 km, is decommissioned http://blogs.fas.org/security/2013/03/tomahawk/. In the 2000s For the Navy, the Americans purchased the RGM / UGM-109E Tactical Tomahawk, with a maximum range of 1600-1700 km and 340 kg OFBCH. They, at present, are the main type of SLCMs on American NK and submarines.
        3. +1
          31 August 2013 18: 33
          Quote: Tu-214P
          And there is a tomahawk with a range of more than 1000 km., Which, as it were, hints that our coastal complexes are still able to repel only the invasion of poachers.


          For this reason, Tmogawk was called up so that the Papuans could shoot bullets from a thousand miles. This is a typical nasty weapon, so that with clean handles on the buttons and no answer in the face ... It rolls only against the Papuans, with serious guys it won't work. Even considering that the Syrians did not have very much half their air defense for sure.
          1. Windbreak
            0
            31 August 2013 23: 30
            That's only in Russia there is a similar subsonic missile ZM-14 with a range of 2000 km
            1. 0
              1 September 2013 00: 26
              Quote: Burel
              That's only in Russia there is a similar subsonic missile ZM-14 with a range of 2000 km


              And there is also ur100 and?
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. The comment was deleted.
      2. Windbreak
        0
        31 August 2013 17: 30
        Quote: svp67
        There is an operational-tactical SCRC "Bastion", with "Yakhants" with a range of about 600 km.
        Its range is 300 km. And 600 km is not the missile range, but the length of the protected coast. Http://www.npomash.ru/activities/ru/missile2.htm? L = 0
    2. beard999
      +4
      31 August 2013 15: 06
      Quote: Enot-poloskun
      Why so little?

      RCC X-35 / 35E (3M24) began to be developed 30 years ago (since March 1983). For that time, a range of 120 km was absolutely satisfactory. Its more modern modification - X-35UE (3M24M1) http://www.ktrv.ru/production/68/673/899/ already has a range of 260 km. Among missiles weighing 400-700 kg (for coastal anti-aircraft missiles), the domestic X-35UE, in terms of maximum firing range, is superior to similar western missiles that are in service: NSM - 185 km, MM-40 block 3 - 180 km, SSM-1B - 150 km, RBS-15Mk.2 - 100 km.
    3. +3
      31 August 2013 16: 46
      Quote: Enot-poloskun
      Why so little?

      Question with target detection. The missile itself does not see such a range, you must first fly up to the target and capture it, and to know where you need to fly you need to find the target. A self-propelled command and control command post is used for detection, its capabilities for detecting sea targets depend on how high it is from sea level, but in any case at a distance of 200 km. he will not see anything, so there is no sense in RCC of such a range.
      1. Asan Ata
        +2
        31 August 2013 23: 14
        It would be nice for every salvo to have a pair of leading missiles with the ignorance of the group on target within the reach of the missiles.
    4. 0
      31 August 2013 18: 29
      The rocket is like that. This is an analogue of the American harpoon, only a little easier.
    5. Alex-z84
      -1
      1 September 2013 12: 17
      300 is also nothing, the SCRC should calmly beat the distance from which the launch of the missile system is carried out, otherwise the meaning of these complexes is practically lost.
  5. +1
    31 August 2013 09: 17
    Yes, it’s good to use something against the landing
  6. 0
    31 August 2013 10: 05
    Locking the barrel - a traditional rotary bolt, having 7 combat stops, for the receiver liner. The bolt frame moves inside the receiver on two guide rods, without touching the walls, the return spring is located in the middle between the rods and above them.

    What the hell is that? wassat
  7. +6
    31 August 2013 10: 05
    For the defense of coastal areas in inland seas, for example, in the Caspian it is. We have one complex in Izberbash so far. There is an export version of the complex in Kamrani (Vietnam). Perhaps in addition to the Uran-E ship missiles from this complex that we already supply to many countries, the coastal Bal-E will go to Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan.

    "Bal-E" is a tactical defensive complex, which, in terms of aggregate performance characteristics, has no equal in the shooting zone from 7 to 120 km from the coastline. It is indispensable in solving problems such as disruption of landing operations, blocking of narrowness, destruction of violators of maritime borders, etc.
    The X-35E missile has significant advantages in a number of characteristics. It is hardly noticeable due to its small size. It flies at low altitudes (from 10-15 m), attacks the target at altitudes of 3 to 5 m, which makes it difficult to destroy the forces of missile defense of enemy ships. The missile is well protected from electronic countermeasures.
    In order for the costs of the complex and its ammunition to pay off, it is enough to complete only one effective salvo to destroy, for example, a naval strike group of three frigates. At the same time, the complex is capable of delivering a second thirty-two-missile salvo 30-40 minutes after the first volley due to the presence of four transport and loading vehicles carrying missiles of the second volley. The short deployment time, target designation, solving the tasks of target distribution, prelaunch preparation and launching the volley allow the complex in a matter of minutes turn around, strike and leave the starting position.
    The complex’s systems make it possible to obtain data on targets without turning on active radar stations when operating in the direction finding mode of radiation from enemy ships from two control vehicles (primary and backup). If the enemy is in the range of active radar systems, then when they are turned on, target designation data can be obtained in a few seconds, as they say, from one “smear” of the antenna.
    The communication facilities of the complex allow it to operate practically in radio silence mode, commands and data are transmitted by closed messages lasting from milliseconds to tenths of a second. The power of radio stations allows them to have an advantage in the signal-to-noise ratio during electronic countermeasures.

    link
    1. +4
      31 August 2013 10: 34
      greetings to all! hi
      video footage in the topic

  8. -2
    31 August 2013 10: 53
    for a long time he is in position. in modern Aviation will not allow conflicts. the Swedes won in 5min RBS15 time to deploy-shoot-roll. and in general, there is something wrong with this complex - the MO is not in a hurry to buy it, probably the rocket is not like it: weak and stupid against the background of analogues
    1. +4
      31 August 2013 16: 36
      Quote: Tlauicol
      for a long time he is in position. in modern Aviation will not allow conflicts.

      Do you think this complex will cover the air defense system? I think yes. Most likely the shell.
      Quote: Tlauicol
      Moscow region is not in a hurry to buy it, probably the rocket does not like: weak and stupid against the background of analogues

      Well, on this "stupid" topic, I offer you a video of the state tests of the BAL complex.
      1. -7
        31 August 2013 17: 49
        The rocket came out really stupid in comparison with its "classmates." It is not universal in terms of carriers (you can't start up with a submarine), does not hit the shore, warhead 140 kg - it turns out that we have been designing a rocket worse than the ancient Harpoon for 30 years! It is not programmed to re-attack in the event of a miss or failure to lock the target, to retarget it, too, there is no data exchange between missiles in flight. It does not hold more than one target in the brain. not Stealth. Who will you sell this to in the 21st century?
        1. Htuek
          +4
          31 August 2013 19: 30
          Do you know anything about her what to write? This rocket has 3 modifications. One of which hangs out on the MiG-29.
      2. 0
        31 August 2013 17: 55
        Quote: Sirocco
        Well, on this "stupid" topic, I offer you a video of the state tests of the BAL complex.

        Impressive, but why shot at a distance of less than 2 km?
      3. -7
        31 August 2013 18: 23
        it's 2013 now. even now, Uranus cannot even half what Harpoon could 40 years ago
        1. +8
          31 August 2013 18: 37
          Quote: Tlauicol
          it's 2013 now. even now, Uranus cannot even half what Harpoon could 40 years ago


          A harpoon, in turn, cannot do what the P500 can do, which was created as an answer to the harpoon.
        2. 0
          31 August 2013 22: 38
          "even now, Uranus cannot even half what Harpoon could 40 years ago"Well, if you think so, then everything is correct. Not a joke.
  9. 0
    31 August 2013 11: 16
    In the case of target designation from Russian ships, it will be quite secretive and effective, but with such a radius of action, the AUG will not even scare you. They would have a couple of Warsaw.
    1. 0
      31 August 2013 16: 50
      Quote: chunga-changa
      . They would have a couple of Warsaw.

      Boats for this were created. In our case with BAL, if suggest that the AUG approached the missile launch distance, then all 32 missiles will be launched, here the AUG will turn like the devil in a frying pan, how many missiles do you think the AUG will intercept? And hitting at least one missile on an Aircraft carrier is enough to undermine the "morale" of the US Army soldiers.
      1. +2
        31 August 2013 18: 39
        Quote: Sirocco
        And hitting at least one missile on an Aircraft carrier is enough to undermine the "morale" of the US Army soldiers.


        Unfortunately, the aircraft carriers went to another sea, apparently just in case ... On the whole, yes, it will be so. God forbid which vessel of the aggressors approach the strike distance. One rocket is enough to immediately end the war for economic reasons laughing
      2. +2
        31 August 2013 19: 38
        Of course, you can assume anything. But, AUG is standardly placed to work on the ground 200-250 miles from the coast (10 minutes of flight), this is more than 400 km. If the AOG approaches the launch distance, its aircraft will gain altitude already above the shore. American generals are certainly all as one, but not to the same extent. Nothing shines in the standard. Only landing gear.
  10. +2
    31 August 2013 12: 41
    if you use the Kh-35U missile, then the range increases up to 260 km.
  11. +2
    31 August 2013 16: 42
    The necessary complex! 120 km is a type for export, well, Iran will have enough to block the spillway !! lol
    1. teleset
      +1
      31 August 2013 16: 46
      here the battle order of the carrier will be very difficult for Pts to approach him for otaki.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        8 September 2013 11: 17
        why immediately to the aircraft carrier?
        the first wave of missiles clears the guard. The second - takes out an aircraft carrier.
  12. +5
    31 August 2013 19: 04
    And where on the plan is a submarine in the wake of an aircraft carrier, with torpedoes pointing along the wake? :-)
  13. Alex-z84
    0
    1 September 2013 12: 12
    Quote: svp67
    "Ball", and it’s not time for you to "tour" to Syria ... Moreover, you are with the letter "E", which means "export" ...

    The range is small, and the tomahawks launch from a distance of 1000 km, so there is no point in the usual target.
  14. 0
    1 September 2013 12: 21
    The "Ball" complex is designed to combat sea targets in the near zone. It is simply not economically feasible to use Yakhont (range of 300 km, charge weight 200-300 kg) at short distances. The Kh-35E rocket occupies its own niche and fully meets the customer's technical requirements. Of the promising anti-ship missiles, the BrahMos joint Russian-Indian missile can be noted, the parameters of which are close to the Yakhont.
    PJ-10 "BrahMos" is a supersonic cruise missile, which can be launched from submarines, surface ships, aircraft or land. It is a joint development of the Defense Research and Development Organization of India (DRDO) and the Russian NPO Mashinostroyenia, which in the 1998 year formed BrahMos Aerospace LLC (Ltd.). The fastest, in service, cruise missile in the world.
    The designation "BrahMos" comes from the names of the two rivers Brahmaputra in India and Moscow in Russia. The missile is capable of developing a speed of Mach 2,8-3,0, which is 3,5 times the speed of the American Harpoon cruise missile. Currently, the possibility of installing and launching BrahMos from aircraft is being tested and it can be expected that by 2012 India will become a country with a supersonic cruise missile in all branches of the military. Moreover, an improved model for the implementation of fast air strikes, capable of developing a speed of 6M, is being tested. Completion of the work is expected by 2016.
    Although the Indian side expected that the BrahMos missile would be built on the basis of the P-700 Granit medium-range cruise missile, Russian specialists, taking into account the norms of the Missile Technology Control Regime, preferred the P-800 Onyx short-range model (but non-export version "Yakhont"), flight design work on which was carried out in full in the early 90s.
    It is estimated that the total development cost will be 13 billion.
  15. +1
    1 September 2013 17: 50
    In the early 80s I had to participate in standard factory tests of the launcher of the previous Rubezh complex. The topic is in demand, it pleases. I agree with the previous comments, I would like to experience a new complex in battle !. True for 100 km. except that the landing order will come up to the coast, but the battleship "Iowa" :))
  16. 0
    2 September 2013 00: 03
    Without cover, the air defense will be defeated on the way to the launch line. And as I understand it, the system is designed to work in echeloned defense. That is, there is "Yakhont" and after it comes "Ball". We cover all this with Vityaz and Pantsir.
    1. 0
      2 September 2013 02: 55
      Quote: Zomanus
      Without cover, the air defense will be defeated as they approach the launch line.
      And what if they ALREADY are in well-protected, well-equipped, and, most importantly, positions that have not yet been discovered by enemy intelligence? In this case, they have a chance to inflict at least one blow on the units of the ships. And in this situation, this may well be enough for the Americans to "calm down"
  17. 0
    2 September 2013 02: 47
    I'd love to believe that the Syrian people have such weapons!
  18. 0
    3 September 2013 21: 54
    Good technique!