Damned august

232
Damned august

February 1993 of the year. Alexander Prokhanov (standing in the center) with the freed members of the Emergency Committee. From left to right (in the first row): O.D.Baklanov, G.I.Yanaev, A.I. Lukyanov, D.T. Yazov; (in the second row) V.V.Generalov, V.S. Pavlov, V.I. Varennikov, O.S.Shenin, V.A.Kryuchkov, Yu.S.Plekhanov. Photos of Y. Rybchinsky and V. Zaporozhchenko

The Communists burned the party cards.
KGBs hid in closets.
It was August. And ended the summer.
Everyone knew that a murder was being prepared.


19 August is coming. And every time that day during all the 25 years, something happens to my mind and to my heart. I feel aching pain, misunderstanding and unbearable bitterness as if these days there was a turning point not only in the fate of my homeland, but also in my own life, and some of its huge, blooming, full of hopes and dreams died, and instead another has arisen: a stoic, tough, cruel, based on the feeling of a continuous struggle stretching on for many decades.

I consider myself a member of the Emergency Committee, although not declared and not accepted by real members of the Emergency Committee in my community. For my newspaper - at that time “Day” and now “Tomorrow” - and I completely shared the aspirations and desires of that doomed group of people who decided to 19 August 1991 of the year to make the last hopeless attempt to save the Soviet Union.

All my life I was a novelist and considered writing novels and traveling where I collected materials for my novels at construction sites, in wars, and in closed laboratories as my main business. But after 1985, when Gorbachev came to power, and gradually, month after month, year after year, his new program, called "perestroika", opened up in me with all its terrible obviousness, I became a politician.

I wrote the article “The tragedy of centralism”, where, in some torturous and terrible insight, I predicted the collapse of the Soviet Union, with all the catastrophic consequences that would follow. Later, at the request of people close to me, including Gennady Zyuganov, I wrote “Word to the People”, in which there was a call - unfortunately belatedly - to rebuff Gorbachev’s policy of destruction and collapse.

And before that, I began to publish the patriotic newspaper Den, in which from the first pages I began to print materials, interviews, meetings with the largest - alas, the last - Soviet statesmen, most of which later became part of the State Committee on the State of Emergency. These were the Marshal of the Soviet Union, Minister of Defense Dmitry Yazov, Commander in Chief of the Black Sea fleet Vladimir Chernavin, Commander-in-Chief of the Ground Forces Valentin Varennikov, Director of the Ural Mechanical Plant Alexander Tizyakov and other characters close to future geocachepists.

Shortly before this, fate brought me together with Oleg Dmitrievich Baklanov, who at that time held a major post of secretary of the Central Committee and curator of law enforcement agencies: I turned to his assistant — without any hope of receiving a positive response — with a proposal to make a conversation. And very soon there was a call, an invitation for this conversation. I remember my first meeting with Oleg Dmitrievich in his office in the Central Committee, where generals, designers, directors of large factories sat in the waiting room, watching with amazement as an unknown person passes to Baklanov, closes in the office and stays there for over an hour.

We talked with Baklanov about politics, about rocket technology, about cosmic mysticism, about the Russian consciousness, which is cosmic in its depths. While we were talking, the photographer shot us many times. I have a whole series of our photos: Oleg Dmitrievich and I are sitting, postures and facial expressions are changing. In essence, this conversation is all captured in frames.

After the conversation, we made friends with Baklanov, although we had a huge subordinate difference. Apparently, he was interested in a Russian writer, an intellectual, a technocrat in his habits, having original views on all current processes.

Baklanov began to invite me to his interesting, for many closed, trips, including in the composition of state commissions. So, I visited with him the Western Group of Forces at the moment when the Berlin Wall was already broken and East Germany was dying, writhing in the last throes of its existence.

He took me with him to a closed atomic city near Tomsk, where I saw the work of a reactor producing plutonium, and the mechanical arms of a steel manipulator, which made snow-like balls from this plutonium.

Baklanov took me to Afghanistan. It was one of my last trips there. We met with Najibullah. Then still alive, not hanged. He blamed us on the fact that the Soviet Union, Gorbachev stopped supplying fuel to Afghanistan and tank oil, which sharply reduced the combat effectiveness of the Afghan army. She began to yield to the pressing Mujahideen.

We went with him to the Urals, where he collected the color of the Ural directors, breeders, defense. I remember this meeting, where venerable men sat, smelted steel, created anti-aircraft missiles, fired elements of nuclear weapons. They talked about conversion. Baklanov asked me to speak in front of this meeting, to which I was completely unprepared. However, I spoke and retold the content of my article, The Tragedy of Centralism, where I predicted the collapse of their enterprises in the event of the end of the Soviet Union. I predicted the collapse of the Soviet technosphere, and if the Soviet state falls. My performance caused a sharply negative attitude. The directors looked at me as if they were mad, as provocateurs. They said: why does he scare us? Why hang noodles on our ears? And they blamed Baklanov for letting me out with a speech. I was very bitter. Although it did not shake my ideas about the processes. I looked at these wonderful people: the order bearers, the heroes of social labor — as if they were doomed, who did not yet know that their Atlantis was slowly sinking into non-being.

At the same time, with Baklanov and a group of military men, in particular, with the commander-in-chief of the fleet, the chief of the General Staff, we flew to Novaya Zemlya. In connection with the closure of the nuclear test site in Semipalatinsk, the question was raised about the resumption of nuclear testing at Novaya Zemlya. And the commission went there to consider the possibilities of this range on the spot.

I will never forget how at first Baklanov and I stood near a sophisticated interceptor, MiG (there, on this range, was based a regiment of interceptors, which apparently had to fly out towards the armada of American B-52 going through the pole with cargo of cruise missiles). And Oleg Dmitrievich touched a thin, razor-like wing. He admired the forms that were created by the designers and competed with nature by their beauty and perfection.
We also stood on the ocean, looked at this gray, steel, stormy elements. On the waves splashing, floated some kind of old board. And we fantasized that this board was the remnant of a great ship that was destroyed in the depths. It also seemed to me that this board is a tablet where secret lines are written, defining our entire destiny, including the collapse of our homeland.

When this board landed on the shore, I pushed it away, metaphysically wanting to save the country from the death sentence. And the wind, the waves again beat her to the shore.
When Baklanov and I returned from these trips, I felt that something was brewing. But I can not say that I felt a conspiracy, that I felt some kind of network, which was thrown on the country.

Baklanov put me in his car, took the radiotelephone and immediately began negotiations. He talked with Boldin, with Kryuchkov, with Pavlov, he called Pugo. And from these fragmentary conversations, in which Baklanov wanted to make sure of something, controlled something, I felt that there was a combination of efforts, a combination of people extremely alarmed by the situation in the country. Then I learned that all these people were members of the Emergency Committee.

I am especially sorry for Pugo Boris Karlovich, with whom I was introduced to the Cormorants at the airport when we got off the plane. I remember his broad, kind face and large warm palm, which then squeezed the gun. From which he shot himself and his wife.

On the nineteenth of August, I was at my dacha near Istra, in Alekhnovo, where there were literary garden plots. There and I had a wooden house, a small - in the 6 acres - plot. In the morning I was woken up by an agitated neighbor. Extremely excited, he said: "Did you hear? Tanks in Moscow. Gorbachev was finally dismissed, finally."

I was extremely pleased. Immediately got into the car, went to Moscow and went straight to his editorial office, which was located on Tsvetnoy Boulevard in the building of the Literary Gazette. All my colleagues were already in place. On the wall was a galvanized metal sheet, which at that time used a printing house to print materials. On this sheet was my interview, which I interviewed from Leonid Shebarshin - then the chief of foreign intelligence and the first deputy Kryuchkov. This was the last publication before the State Emergency Committee, which was made by the newspaper Den.

The news of the State Emergency Committee caught all the Moscow serviceman by surprise. No one knew that this speech was being prepared, everyone was extremely embarrassed, confused. I was embarrassed by the very nature of this event: the absence of the internees, the work of all communication systems. All phones worked: city, internal, closed. They worked in the same mode of radio, television, from time to time automatically repeating the text of the manifesto of the Emergency Committee.

The high-ranking officials knew my proximity to the gocechepists: to the Ministry of Defense, and to Baklanov, and to Kryuchkov, who, as I was told, carefully read my article “The Tragedy of Centralism”, emphasizing with various felt-tip pens in various places. And what was strange was that the party nomenklatura bureaucracy found nothing better than to contact me in order to receive information about the Emergency Committee. I remember that Nikolai Ivanovich Shlyaga, the then head of the political department of the army, rang the second figure after the Minister of Defense, who would receive all the information from his chief Yazov. But there was no such information. And Shlyaga called me to find out more about the Emergency Committee and maybe even get some directives from me. God knows, I did not order Shlyage to move to the front with a platoon of motorcyclists, but simply said what I knew myself.

In the evening of the same day, Vladimir Nikolaevich Sevruk, a powerful leader of the Central Committee, a master of ideology, came to my home. By that time he was already slightly pressed, perhaps even in disgrace, for his radical Soviet views. We sometimes met with him, but this time he came to my house, without warning: he rang the doorbell and entered. I then lived in Pushkin Square, and he worked in Izvestia opposite, across the street. He was in an elegant gray suit, was in great shape, inspired, and said: "If the party requires my presence, I am at your disposal." And this he told me, to a man who had never been in the party, as if I were the secretary of the Central Committee! He also assumed that I belonged to that group. Oh, the great illusions, oh, the incompetence of our politicians, oh, the delusions that they feed to this day not only in relation to my person, but also in relation to the structure of the country.

These three days I remember very poorly. There was some confusion, a change of events. The troops entered on the first day, they rumbled through the main streets. Then I saw these tanks, which stopped, the girls and young people climbed on them and shoved carnations into the guns.
I rushed to the White House and saw the tanks standing there. And although they came there supposedly to protect this building from pogroms, but they were already turned over, they were tank-traitors. I saw barricades around the White House. But these were absolutely ephemeral barricades: some pieces of wire, fittings, plywood shields ... I climbed through it all very easily, but did not go inside the building, because it was hostile to me from there. Apparently, I felt that Rostropovich was running around this building, holding a machine gun in his hands.

Then the crashes began. A strange press conference, where Yanaev’s hands were shaking ... In my novel, The Death of the Red Gods, I wrote that during this press conference, the opponents of the Emergency Committee turned on the refrigerators, and all the gakachepisty were covered with frost, their hands were shaking from the cold.
Then the trips began, throwing gakkachepistov in Foros to Gorbachev ... I did not understand what was happening. I was at that time in absolute isolation from my gekachepistkikh acquaintances. Only once, when I got to meet with Varennikov, I got through to him. Then he returned from the Kiev Military District. I asked: what is happening? He said: "I will explain later, and now I will shake your hand." So he said: "I shake your hand."

Then there was a night with three crushed activists who set fire to the cars, and the cars, blinded by fire, rushed forward and chopped them with their tracks. There was blood. This was what is now called the sacred sacrifice. This created a situation of a completely new psychology. The front-line soldier Yazov, who had seen so much blood in his lifetime, put so many of his comrades into mass graves, death soared over his head so many times - he was broken by this blood, this sacred sacrifice. And he ordered the withdrawal of troops from Moscow.

Now, after many years, returning to those times, thinking, recalling, looking through documents, I have no doubt that the restructuring of Gorbachev, which some people call an unsuccessful attempt to reform the Soviet Union, was in fact a four-year-long special operation. When in layers, every year, every day, every day the ideological constants that held the Soviet state were destroyed by means of television, the press, and party leaders. The ideas about the heroes of the civil war, the Great Patriotic War, the Great Five-Year Plans, the Soviet culture, the Soviet military-industrial complex, the Soviet army were destroyed. Everything was destroyed and destroyed. By the time these constants were destroyed, the Soviet ideology remained from the Soviet ideology, which meant that the state was left with liquid. And the state fell.

The State Emergency Committee was the final chord, the final phase of this special operation. Alexander Ivanovich Tizyakov, a Uralets citizen, told me that Gorbachev himself was looking through the lists of the Emergency Committee and included those or other members there. In particular, Vasily Aleksandrovich Starodubtsev. According to Gorbachev, the Emergency Committee was supposed to detonate a coup, stir up the nation. And then, when Yeltsin was to be arrested, this order should not have been received. And Kryuchkov did not give this order. Kryuchkov was part of this Gorbachev plot. After the order was not followed, the Emergency Committee, not fulfilling its main task, was confused, he was destroyed, rushed to Gorbachev, urging him to return to Moscow. Gorbachev threw the Emergency Committee across the moat, to Yeltsin, gave it to the mercy of the democratic crowd.

At that time, a real, not imaginary, coup d'etat was accomplished. He concluded that when Gorbachev returned from Foros, Yeltsin, who had seized all his powers during the GKChP - control over the army, special services, finances, industry, did not return him these powers, and Gorbachev did not demand them. Thus, after August 1991, all powers from the union center were transferred to the regional - to the Russian - center. And the union center as such disappeared. Nothing more restrained the suburbs, the republics, and they began to crumble, disintegrate. I repeat: the State Emergency Committee is not a farce, not an error of weak people. This is the final phase of the special operation called Perestroika.

Moscow remained empty for the whole night. It was a terrible time. It seemed that Moscow had sucked all the air, it was airless. Hot asphalt steel night color, which was dimly reflected lights, inflamed air ....
And then Yeltsin from Alma-Ata came to Moscow and was not arrested as planned. For according to the State Emergency Committee, immediately after the announcement of the manifesto, fifty or sixty people were supposed to intern, among them Yeltsin. And I know that when Yeltsin was driving from the airport to Moscow, to the White House, the Alpha group sat in the roadside thicket, waiting for Kryuchkov’s order to block the road and arrest Yeltsin. There was no order. And Yeltsin safely rushed to the center of Moscow, climbed onto the tank ... We know this centaur: with the body of the tank and the head of Yeltsin.
It was an absolutely psychological turning point when the Emergency Committee fell under the authority of these hypnotic forces.

I needed to understand what happened. Because I had to issue a newspaper issue. I called several times to the reception room of Baklanov in the Central Committee, I had excellent relations with his assistant. And on TV they broadcast: the arrests of the gakachepistov, among those arrested and Oleg Baklanov. And I stopped calling, believing that this meeting was not destined to take place. But suddenly a bell rang in my house, Baklanov’s assistant on the phone, said: “You wanted to see Oleg Dmitrievich? He’s in his office, you can come.” It terribly amazed me, because everyone said that he was arrested. And he was free.

I threw everything and went to the Old Square. It was an amazing march. The State Emergency Committee has already lost. All Moscow raged and curled over the victorious liberals and democrats. When I walked along Tverskaya to the Old Square, they recognized me. They did not pounce on me, but screamed, shouted, someone spat in my direction, because I was a herald of this putsch. No wonder Alexander Yakovlev subsequently called the Den newspaper the putsch laboratory, and Prokhanov the chief theoretician of the putsch.

I went to see Oleg Dmitrievich Baklanov. And I was scared to go. It seemed to me that I was going to the right slaughter. And frankly speaking, I trembled.

I got to the building of the Central Committee. I have already been issued a pass. I thought that the guards at the turnstiles - state security officers - would arrest me here.
But I passed without any hindrances, took the elevator to the floor where Baklanov's office was located, entered the reception room. Usually in this reception room was crowded. There were always important noble people, and everyone needed something from Baklanov: help, signature, advice, support ... And now the reception room was completely empty, the door to the office was opened. Oleg Dmitrievich walked around the office. I entered, saw him very tired, unshaven. He returned from Foros the day before. He walked around the room intimidated, in the office of a champing machine, which was cutting documents for noodles. Apparently, he destroyed some papers that could hurt everyone. We hugged. We had no conversation. It was not to talk - everything was hanging by a thread. I just asked: "What happened, Oleg Dmitrievich?" He paused, and then said: Yazov and Kryuchkov faltered. He also told me: "My advice to you is to lie down on the bottom."
We hugged and I left. Two hours later he was arrested.

After that, there was that terrible night — when monuments were being poured, when Moscow was buzzing with an abundance of Democrats, they went happy. And I had the feeling that the spirits of Moscow are flying away. All the red angels fly away. There was a sense of metaphysical catastrophe that was in Moscow. There was a feeling that Red Atlantis was dying, and I, along with it, was also doomed to death.

Then there were terrible days immediately after the Emergency Committee. I went to the editorial office - and I went to the editorial office and worked, like all my comrades: we supported each other, understood the danger that hung over us, waited for repression - correspondents began to come to my office. After all, I was, of course, a herald of a coup, a herald of resistance, I was a singer of the Soviet Union, and they all came to enjoy my defeat, to see my weakness, my cowardice, to see my fear-filled eyes, to hear my excuses.

I remember two visits. The visit of a famous TV man, but I already forgot his name. He came to me and under the camera asked: "How do you feel about the blood that is spilled on the street?" And I said: if in order to save millions of my compatriots and the fate of my fatherland, blood is needed, it was worth shedding that blood. It went on the air and scrolled repeatedly. I watched TV and saw myself sitting at a table in a white suit and pronouncing this phrase. And everyone said: here he is, cannibal, bloodsucker, fascist.

And the second memorable visit is the correspondent of Komsomolskaya Pravda. He came and ironically began to say: "Now, finally, the long-awaited freedom has come. How do you feel about freedom?" And I said: "Damn your freedom, if it is worth the fate of my state." This material and went out in "Komsomolskaya Pravda" - "Damn your freedom." And this material also had to serve defamation, humiliation and extermination of my will, suppression of my health. I was at the borderline. All fears, horrors, all birth injuries resurrected. They lived in me, they choked. I could break, probably. And in order not to break down, in order not to retreat, I decided to rush forward.

After Baklanov advised me to lie down on the bottom, I gave the entire number of pictures I took after the first conversation with the State Emergency Committee of the newspaper that the photographer did during our first conversation with Baklanov - she was all upset. I said this way: yes, I am a member of the register, yes, I am with Baklanov, we are together, we are indissoluble, I assume everything. And I still praise myself for this act.

This drama, this disaster was transferred to the depths of the Union of Writers. Immediately Sergei Mikhalkov, who was then head of the Union, gathered the entire secretariat. And I was the chief editor of The Day, it belonged to the Writers' Union, and I also attended.
At that moment in my office on the wall was hanging upcoming newspaper strip, I had to issue a number. And the first thing Mikhalkov did was, the State Emergency Committee supported: "I support the State Emergency Committee." And in our newspaper in the set, in the galley was: "Mikhalkov supported the State Emergency Committee." I'm on the phone dictated it in the newspaper. During that meeting at the secretariat, we began to think. I do not remember who behaved like myself. And then I thought that there would be a very hard pressing - Soviet such - for all these democratic traitors, and I, the bureaucrats, said: "It seems to me that we, the writers, must stand against possible reprisals. We should take those under our wing who is likely to be pursued. "

In short, the Secretariat’s viewpoint on events has changed several times. On the wall, in these newspapers, my comrades several times changed their point of view. And in the end, the idea of ​​neutrality was expressed: we are aloof from this.
In the Writers' Union, there was such a consultant at the time - Savelyev, an unsympathetic figure, he was already dead, but then he, when the secretariat was not even finished, when Mikhalkov just said that the State Emergency Committee should support, he immediately tapped off - or went - to Komsomomolk , and there came out the material "Union of Writers of the USSR supported the State Emergency Committee." What was the reason for the immediate defeat of the Writers' Union. A group of liberal writers rushed there: Yevtushenko, Grigory Baklanov ... They came in the wake of suppression, hatred, and their victory. And none of our secretaries of the Writers' Union did not show up - everyone was scared - such was the pressure. All scattered! Worthy people - order bearers, gray hair ... None of them came to fight with these nouveau riche.
And the center of writing has moved from Vorovskogo Street - from the House of Rostovs, where there was a big Union, to Komsomolsky Avenue - to the Union of Writers of Russia. All patriotic writers came there these nights nights. Everyone was waiting for an attack on this house. They said that Yevgeny Yevtushenko with the police and the prefect Muzykantsky now come here, they will arrest, expel.

And we decided to keep the defense. Now it's funny, but then it was a very powerful decision. Young people from the Slavic Cathedral joined the writers and were with them. I do not remember their names. But they were beautiful people with blond beards, with blue eyes. They created a militarized department, hung out orders: order No. 1, order No. 2 ... According to one of the orders, it was supposed to break all the furniture there and barricade it on the ground floor windows. Fortunately, the furniture was not broken, and the windows remained intact.
That night, we gathered, sang Russian songs, recited poems, played guitars, drank vodka, framed. It seemed to us that Atlantis was going down. So we spent that night. Muzykantsky came to the house, but the Union remained for Russian writers.
Then came the days after the defeat of the State Emergency Committee, the hysteria of the victorious liberals. The Day was closed for re-registration, kept in uncertainty for a very long time, and then we, the staff of The Day, went to picket the Ministry of Information. It was located somewhere on Povarskaya, Poltoranin was the minister. We stood in rows in pickets, we had posters on our chests. Liberal journalists, including Mark Deutsch, full of irony, came to watch our picket.

But we persevered then. Heads bowed, almost everything bent: army, state security, directors. Only Anpilov’s and Russian writers did not give up along with our newspaper.
After this came the long grueling days of battles that led us to 1993. And this battle has acquired new bloody forms.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

232 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    19 August 2016 18: 59
    Excellent article.
    1. +15
      19 August 2016 19: 22
      You cannot attribute all evil to communism. Communism is not good or evil at all, but only a certain type of organization of society. And, if he was defeated, then he was mastered precisely by the phenomena of communality against which he fought, supported by external enemies. Alexander Zinoviev. The death of Russian communism.
      - The Russian people could survive as a historical people only as a communist people. With any other system, it is doomed to degradation and death. As experience has shown, the blow to communism in Russia was a blow to the Russian people. However, it was intended for him from the very beginning, and communism was only an excuse and a disguise of true intentions. Alexander Zinoviev. The death of Russian communism.
      - Such a massive epidemic of anti-patriotism, self-humiliation, defeatism, Kholuy cronyism towards the West, envy of Western nations, imitation of the entire Western, especially the vices of double-dealing and direct betrayal that began after 1985, would not have been tolerated by any European people. Alexander Zinoviev. The death of Russian communism.
      If it (the Soviet economy, approx. Auth.) Were really hopeless, the Western organizers of the Cold War, who were interested in defeating the Soviet Union, would in no way instead impose some kind of “market economy”, supposedly capable of raising the Soviet Union to the level of Western countries. Alexander Zinoviev. The death of Russian communism.
      The Soviet Union and Russia were defeated in a fierce struggle with the superior forces of an external enemy, whose name is the West. Alexander Zinoviev. The death of Russian communism
      In the Cold War, it was not capitalism that won, but the best means of fooling people, acting on his behalf. Alexander Zinoviev. The death of Russian communism.
      Quote: The Bloodthirster
      Excellent article.

      And a great addition
      1. +6
        19 August 2016 19: 52
        The Russian people could survive as a historical people only as a communist people. With any other system, it is doomed to degradation and death.

        And Vasya Kozhina didn’t know when the skewers were strung on forks
        1. +4
          19 August 2016 20: 18
          Vasya Kozhina, the custodian pulled the forks, and she was right.
          1. 0
            19 August 2016 20: 39
            Quote: The Bloodthirster
            Vasya Kozhina, the custodian pulled the forks, and she was right.

            There is no doubt about it
      2. +5
        19 August 2016 19: 53
        Quote: The Bloodthirster
        In the Cold War, it was not capitalism that won, but the best means of fooling people, acting on his behalf. Alexander Zinoviev. The death of Russian communism.

        First of all, the counter-revolution won due to the betrayal of the degenerate traitors, about whom both Lenin and Stalin spoke and fought with them, in the state and party apparatus of the USSR.
        And then the people already duped by counter-propaganda.
        The creative cunning intelligentsia played its vile role in undermining the Soviet foundations, giving their creations to the mountain in the form of naked bored and op on the screens and the same thing in print.
        A special role was played by the traitors in the ranks of the GB, who did not fulfill their oath, and then their officer duty.
        And in 91 -93, the Ost plan, or as it is now called the Dulles plan, was implemented not only in the sense of dismantling the Soviet system, but also dismembering
        country.
        This plan, now called "utilization of Russia", continues to be carried out before our eyes, already under different slogans, with other leaders, heavily retouched, but no less terrible and cruel in relation to the indigenous peoples.
        The process started in 85th-91-93gg inexorably continues and enters the final stage.
        And only the "blind" can or do not want to notice this.
      3. +3
        19 August 2016 21: 09
        The Soviet Union and Russia were defeated in a fierce struggle with the superior forces of an external enemy, whose name
        ---------------------------------------
        I do not agree with this thesis.
        Not defeated but betrayed and sold by the elite of the country.
        1. +3
          19 August 2016 21: 13
          In vain do not agree, it is a fact.
          Internal and external, joined forces, as a result, we all had drunk at the helm for a decade, the most terrible decade, when all the foam, dirt, the animal of the lowest injuries crawled around.
    2. +3
      19 August 2016 19: 44
      Quote: The Bloodthirster
      Excellent article.

      And what's so great about her?
      The author writes about his beloved gender of the article. I drank with it, talked with it
      1. +1
        19 August 2016 20: 22
        The width of the epaulettes and the funky two eagles on it say absolutely nothing about the true intellectual appearance of the writer.
        If you didn’t understand the first time, read the second one, if the second time, don’t understand, don’t even try, and you don’t even need to write a comment, they’ll laugh.
        If you, you only figured out with whom you drank, had a bite with this, then perhaps you should find a drinking companion, though it is not a fact that they will be in those ranks and with the same knowledge as witnesses of the events and Prokhanov.
        1. +2
          19 August 2016 20: 47
          Quote: The Bloodthirster
          If you, you only figured out with whom you drank, had a snack with this, then maybe you should find a drinking companion, though it’s not a fact that they will be in those ranks and with the same knowledge as witnesses of the events and Prokhanov’s

          Take everything from the government. Of course, the exchange is unambiguous
          1. 0
            19 August 2016 21: 06
            With yours, from your government, on one hectare, and then ... it’s disgusting, and at the table, that's all ...
            1. -3
              19 August 2016 21: 37
              Quote: The Bloodthirster
              .On the contrary, and at the table, that's all ...

              Without the Guards badge, I won’t sit at the table with you. In the sense of a lot of bla, but no sense
              1. 0
                19 August 2016 21: 58
                Oh ... who would say what ... Go alalakayte further "guardsman"
      2. +15
        19 August 2016 20: 30
        Quote: Tusv
        Quote: The Bloodthirster
        Excellent article.

        And what's so great about her?
        The author writes about his beloved gender of the article. I drank with it, talked with it


        Yes, Prokhanov told about himself and nice, nice people. But a "good man" is not a profession. And they were weak professionals. Having power in their hands, at first they asked for the country, and then they could not return it. When a person with a "wide kind face and a large warm palm" puts a bullet in his forehead, it is a tragedy. But, if this person is the Minister of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, this is betrayal and powerlessness.
        1. +2
          19 August 2016 20: 39
          My God, the whole article is a continuous ode to oneself, only one self-admiration ... this is what is called a "dance on the bones". In this case, on the bones of the Union.
          1. 0
            19 August 2016 21: 14
            Quote: Haettenschweiler
            My God, the whole article is a continuous ode to oneself, only one self-admiration ... this is what is called a "dance on the bones". In this case, on the bones of the Union.

            Alas, one must be able to clearly distinguish between the tragedy of the USSR and the tragedy of the writer Prokhanov. The latter is a clinical case. This person, at least for now, has nothing to do with communism.
        2. 0
          19 August 2016 20: 45
          Well, tell me, what would you do?
          Or, after the fact, are everyone smart, everyone knows everything, the whole alignment of who for what and from whom is known?
          These are the memories of a person who survived that catastrophe, but what are you talking about?
          Have at least a little respect for Akhromeev, Pugo to others, whose death, according to some estimates, was FORCED in nature ..
          1. 0
            20 August 2016 09: 08
            Bloodsucker And what is there to know? At the very beginning, it was necessary to put Yakovlev and Gorbachev on a stake and the KGB had to untie their hands so that they could thin out your top! And what happened? Who was bought, who was intimidated, and the country was brought to the end! As a result, only a few communists did not betray the USSR!
            1. 0
              20 August 2016 16: 26
              However, you, even realizing that you have not betrayed everything, continue to yell everywhere that EVERYONE has betrayed you all, have you already indicated who is worthy of respect, who betrayed what you served, a cardboard carrier in everyday life, a party card or a person who did not sell the Idea with the same party card in your pocket? Are you fornication in three pines?
        3. +2
          19 August 2016 21: 46
          Quote: Monos
          first they asked if the country, and then they couldn’t return it

          You that. Cheto didn’t go there. Or I didn’t understand you. Russia does not lose
          1. +7
            19 August 2016 23: 39
            Quote: Tusv
            You that. Cheto didn’t go there. Or I didn’t understand you. Russia does not lose


            I clarify.
            Since the 1985 of the year, there has been a systematic collapse of the Country. By 1991, everything collapsed: ideology, the political system, financial, production. I remember this time well. There was a complete feeling that the authorities were losing control of the situation, that control was seized by young Komsomol wolves of liberal ferment. In general - the impotence of power led the country to a tragedy.
            But, after all, all of them (Yanaev, Pugo, Kryuchkov, Yazov, Baklanov) were from the highest echelon of power, all were members of the Central Committee. What prevented them from normalizing the situation on time? My answer: self-confidence and incompetence.
            When they realized it, it was too late. They tried to crush it with authority, but ... You know, Prokhanov is telling some stories about refrigerators, it's ridiculous. When I saw the shaking hands of Yanaev, I realized: this is agony.
            My opinion: Without Gorbachev there would not have been a State Emergency Committee; without the Emergency Committee, there would have been no Yeltsin; without Yeltsin there would have been no Putin; without Putin there would have been no revival of Russia. Each played a role in history, and history is a logical and logical thing, because it is written by God. And she has no subjunctive mood.
      3. -1
        19 August 2016 20: 59
        So this is the whole essence of the "Prokhanovs".
      4. 0
        20 August 2016 01: 14
        And what did you want from the novelist) Here, in three paragraphs, you can briefly outline the situation.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +3
      20 August 2016 03: 32
      The State Emergency Committee is a clear example of the disintegration of the party elite. He was initially weak, and his indecision was obvious to the people. The rotten elite, led by the "neoliberal" Gorbachev, collapsed, dragging an entire empire with it. The hands and knees of the heads of the security agencies trembled, they left the Union to mock the young reformers. That is why this operetta GKChP was conceived in the role of putschists. If they had genuine intentions, organization and will to preserve the USSR, everything could be different.
  2. +19
    19 August 2016 19: 17
    My father said back then: the GKChP needs to be shot, because they did not finish it to the end. Now understand.
  3. PKK
    +2
    19 August 2016 19: 19
    Alexander Prokhanov, a true Writer, going his own way through life. And when you meet with Alexander on the pages of publications, you pull yourself up to his level and begin to understand the Suffering of Our Homeland. New forces are emerging in order to survive our enemies. Thanks to the Author.
  4. +17
    19 August 2016 19: 20
    How can you forget this !? I remember that day well, I served then in sunny Baku. The first reports of events in Moscow inspired some hope that the chaos and chaos in the country created by Gorbachev and his associates would finally end. However, hopes for the best were not destined to come true, and the farce with a coup ended in nothing. More precisely, the collapse of the once mighty state. Then there was our Russian Maidan in 1991, the second, tragic part of this performance will be already in 1993. And then it won't be funny at all. The events of August 1991 are misunderstood or deliberately called an attempt at a right-wing anti-constitutional coup of the State Emergency Committee. In our time of inverted, distorted, meanings, they must be understood exactly the opposite. It was an attempt to thwart the right-wing, anti-constitutional coup. Unsuccessful attempt. As a result, an operation was carried out in the USSR in the interests of the United States to dismember the country and renounce socialism. According to the methods of its implementation, it was in its pure form an "orange revolution", when using the impulse of the people, the desire for positive changes, those who used this impulse for their own selfish purposes came to power, destroyed socialism and created capitalism, which is now destroying Russia.
    Unfortunately, then many, especially in Moscow, Leningrad and other large cities, sincerely believed that it was impossible to continue living the way we lived then, which was worse than the USSR in the history of mankind, the country did not exist, and therefore it must be destroyed. Why they managed to fool the people is a separate question. But the fact remains - the great country was destroyed under the "Swan Lake", the whistle and hooting of the crowd.
    1. +6
      19 August 2016 19: 27
      Something in the photo in the lower left corner is somehow suspicious
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +13
    19 August 2016 19: 30
    Prokhanov is a huge plus. I'll add it myself. That, thrice-damned night, I was on duty in the regiment and received a message about the State Emergency Committee at about 04.00 am (Kaliningrad time). Informed on command, followed the instructions of the NSh (the commander was on vacation). In short, he fulfilled his duties. Further - observations. In assessing the events, the officers were divided into two unequal parts. Most - Hurray! It's time to end the mess! Minority - So what? Can't I sell the company property now? Among the warrant officers, the reaction was unequivocal - Krants, now they will jail me!
    By evening, everyone calmed down and accepted that the ensigns would win!
    1. +3
      19 August 2016 21: 28
      Quote: beer-youk
      Further - observations.

      in this phrase the entire position of the author. Where were you, my dear man, when the ensigns took a part away, watched? We are still waiting for the new master to come and put things in order (just like xoxly: "Bandera will come ....) Bulgakov was right:" chaos begins in the heads "and no GKChP would fix this country.
  7. +6
    19 August 2016 19: 44
    Dear forum users can be a little off topic!
    Read now on politicus http://politikus.ru/ "Dmitry Livanov has been dismissed" This is good news if it’s not a fake and even on Friday I’ll be celebrating with my family drinks .
    1. +6
      19 August 2016 20: 17
      Quote: Olegater
      Dear forum users can be a little off topic!
      Read now on politicus http://politikus.ru/ "Dmitry Livanov has been dismissed" This is good news if it’s not a fake and even on Friday I’ll be celebrating with my family drinks .

      Yes? And the TV box told me on Vesti that he was appointed ambassador to Ukraine for trade and economic relations. Celebrate something better. The victory of the synchronized swimmers, or something. drinks
      1. 0
        19 August 2016 21: 34
        AMBASSADOR TO UKRAINE ON TRADE AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS! What? On any such matters with Ukraine? Yes, this is a link! Right there in VO how many people wrote - why not a teacher as Minister of Education. Here is a teacher, a historian. Woman. We will see further. But there was hope that school (and not only) things would go to improvement.
      2. +3
        19 August 2016 22: 15
        Now I continue to celebrate. I read your comment. Here is his quote: Yes? And the TV box told me on Vesti that he was appointed ambassador to Ukraine for trade and economic relations. But I have a question what kind of trading, but they generally have Ukrainians?
        1. +4
          19 August 2016 22: 41
          Quote: housewife
          AMBASSADOR TO UKRAINE ON TRADE AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS! What?

          Quote: Olegater
          But I have a question what kind of trading, but they generally have Ukrainians?

          Do not ask me, but Putin. And who is Vasilyeva from the Kremlin’s administration, who was appointed head of the Ministry of Education, I don’t know. Better Apple Spas celebrate. laughing
          1. +4
            20 August 2016 00: 30
            Respected Mordvin 3 I stubbornly continue to celebrate with my family. and no interruptions will stop us laughing drinks fellow
            1. +3
              20 August 2016 00: 39
              Quote: Olegater
              stubbornly continue to celebrate. and no interruptions will stop us

              Yes, to health. And I have already run out of fuel. crying
    2. +1
      19 August 2016 21: 30
      Quote: Olegater
      Dmitry Livanov dismissed "This is good news

      So what? We have almost the entire government such Dmitry Livanov, now appointed the same Livanov only in a skirt. They do not decide, they are only performers.
    3. +2
      19 August 2016 22: 19
      Livanov has already been appointed to represent the president. Seen for special valor!
      Representative - in translation it is like a person. I would disdain that such a person represents me.
  8. +8
    19 August 2016 19: 54
    Dear Mr. Prokhanov, very talentedly glorified himself in the article. They always tried to destroy Russia with the help of coups and riots. Something is always happening in Moscow. What? Yes, power is shared by those with these. Rampant Satan. Poddaknu Prokhanov - only God keeps Russia. Have the people been duped? In the sense of? It was quiet here in a province far from the capitals. Yes, we only know what will be said on TV and what is in our place. Why do they always try to solve everything with blood? Do they need a sacred sacrifice? What is this - Satanism? why after the 17th year there was a civil war, but not in the 90s? And in the 17th, people lost property, and those that did not have, hoped to get it. And in the 90s - what did people lose? This is what Chubais said. About privatization. All the same division "Nobody was going to give anything to the people. We had to take away the property from the communists. We took it away. And the people didn't have anything and now they don't, so the people didn't suffer" and you can at least bombard me with your minuses and accuse me of illiteracy , but if right tomorrow there will again be something like 93, the people will be silent again. Okay, who has that - I have a Holiday today. Transfiguration. Which no coups will take away from me.
    1. 0
      19 August 2016 21: 34
      Good girl. I apologize for being so free, in an old-fashioned way.
      This is the truth of life. Unfortunately this is the case. And maybe it’s right. The voice of the people is the voice of God, as they say ...
      With great respect, Yurganov Andrey Vladimirovich.
  9. +10
    19 August 2016 19: 55
    And I was on duty that day on the ship (Khabarovsk Territory, Sovgavansky District). In the morning, at the meeting, the commander reported to him about the State Emergency Committee as an incident that occurred during duty. The flag-raising commander announced events in the West to the crew, and said that we continue to obey the LAW authority, and further on the routine and plan of the BP. And in the political department of the base, portraits of Gorbachev were removed, and a week later they were hanged back.
    1. +4
      19 August 2016 21: 33
      Quote: Galleon
      And in the political department of the base, portraits of Gorbachev were removed, and a week later they were hanged back.

      and in the political department they always hesitated along with the party’s general line.
  10. +4
    19 August 2016 19: 57
    The article was written beautifully, he himself was at that time for shit, then he thought better of it ... disgusting to remember the past, how ELBON - the savior rejoiced, Lord forgive me !!!
  11. +6
    19 August 2016 20: 18
    Due to the indecision of the GKChP, because of their mildness, one labeled scum was replaced by a damned alcoholic! And this animal has become a country to the west and the USA with offal !!! How much will we tolerate fools and mediocrity in power ??? now an iPhone boob, tomorrow they will impose a non-traditionally oriented country ??? When will God turn his eyes to our country ???
  12. +12
    19 August 2016 20: 30
    The State Emergency Committee lost, as it was intended by its real organizers. And he lost the main thing - the mind of Muscovites. Why was "Swan Lake" or something inarticulate on all four television channels? Why did none of them explain what they want in a day? In Moscow, wild rumors immediately spread about repression, and in 37, and the people massively supported the opponents of the Emergency Committee, with slogans for freedom, publicity and democracy.
    Most, of course, were just waiting for the end of the matter, but there were an order of magnitude more active opponents.
    I remember, on the 20th, how a lady near the Moscow hotel, where there was a cordon of the Kremlin of puny conscripts, furiously told them: "Are you really going to shoot at the people?" And the whole line of the crowd in front of the cordon asked questions to which the conscripts could not give an answer, and not only because they were forbidden to speak.
    Where was Prokhanov then? Why did he convince the directors (who just wanted nothing to change), and not the students? But all that was needed was a compromise between the interests of youth and the interests of business executives and apparatchiks.
    Tens of thousands of people walked along Tverskaya, the city hall was going on a continuous rally, and most just wanted to find out what was happening (including myself, the students had vacations), but the GKChP was generally disapproved.
    Didn't Prokhanov really understand for so many years that at that moment a return to the pre-Gorbachev Soviet Union was no longer possible? But the GKChP could not offer a compromise, find new ways, they did not even understand that it was necessary. Remember the Maidan "promise them everything, and we will hang them later"? So Yeltsin promised, later promised the miners even to lie on the rails (but did not lie down), but the State Emergency Committee did not even promise.

    Now it’s clear that the technology was applied completely maidan, adjusted for the lack of the Internet and mobile phones, but the printed word was valid.
    The defenders of the White House also organized in tens and hundreds, and if suddenly the storming of the White House began, they had to gather in a living ring on a phone call.
    Gorbachev, apparently, was himself influenced (I really hope that this will someday come up), he spoke only with memorized phrases, sometimes he carried obvious nonsense.
    1. +2
      19 August 2016 21: 47
      Absolute truth. I remember Chelyabinsk, on the 19th, Revolution Square (this is under the windows of the Regional Committee and the Regional Executive Committee) and the cowardly shuffling of "comrades" from these institutions from the back door and into the stall in official cars. If only someone went out to the people. Some comrades from the factory organizations are good fellows, they tried to say something, and very often on the case. And at the district and regional level, not a single jackal was there until the very end. That's the whole point about the leading and guiding role of this organized crime group of union significance, called the CPSU.
      1. +3
        19 August 2016 22: 50
        Thanks for the minus. So I really don't like it, my eyes hurt
        1. 0
          20 August 2016 22: 07
          The organized crime group, the Yeltsin gang?
          That's for sure, she conquered the country and began to rob so that no nightingale-robber, together with Batu, Hitler and Napoleon dreamed.
  13. +7
    19 August 2016 20: 38
    It is not necessary to mourn the old power, remembering the good, but to build a new one, striving for the ideal.
  14. +1
    19 August 2016 20: 47
    GKChP members tried to save the country. It is a pity then they could not (or did not dare) bang Yeltsin.
    1. -1
      19 August 2016 22: 17
      Not a country, but a system, and their place in power, under which they lived much better than the main people they tried to save. You do not fool yourself
  15. +4
    19 August 2016 21: 00
    I still remember those days. I then worked in the car depot of the Regional Public Health Department. We were then jokingly called "the second taxi station", FOR FREE TIME AND GASOLINE. So, when the State Emergency Committee passed away, after work we got into a conversation, and one driver says:
    - Guys, you will not believe, but I gave a lift to those guys (who are in sports uniform and with a bull's neck). Two days ago, they said to each other, "That's it, we have a khan." And today there are such joyful ones, they say, "Well, we’ll wait a little longer" ... We in Kostroma then called them "cruisers" ... And they killed the "arrow" on the Volga ... That's how they were, they were ...
    1. +1
      19 August 2016 21: 37
      Quote: sabakina
      We were then jokingly called "the second taxi station", FOR FREE TIME AND GASOLINE.

      in a normal society, a person would be ashamed to say that he stole from the state, but this is our Soviet upbringing. Now such "taxers" are groaning about the Emergency Committee that they have torn them off the trough, and now it is difficult to steal, the owners have appeared.
      1. +8
        19 August 2016 22: 46
        Quote: veteran66

        in a normal society, a person would be ashamed to say that he stole from the state, but this is our Soviet upbringing. Now such "taxers" are groaning about the Emergency Committee that they have torn them off the trough, and now it is difficult to steal, the owners have appeared.

        Tovarisch (or gentleman) apparently has not worked since 91, otherwise he would have known what real theft is. Now, when the "owners" steal from their employees, underpaying their wages and into the pension fund, depriving them of their pensions from the state in the form of taxes, theft is child's play.
        1. 0
          19 August 2016 23: 23
          That is, according to your logic, the current theft justifies the former?
          So maybe the former and gave rise to such a scope of theft in our time?
          1. 0
            20 August 2016 22: 01
            Do not distort the master to chatter what was not said. The theft of the former is not justified, but the theft of the present is terrifying.
            And you, the servant of the present, indulge in further theft, do you pay welding in retirement?
            1. 0
              21 August 2016 09: 23
              Do you disagree with this phrase: "So maybe the former gave rise to such a scale of theft in our time?"
              And will you be able to substantiate your statement: "you, the servant of the present, condone further theft"? And about the servant and about the indulgence?

              I am ashamed of you. Although maybe you are a former political officer?
      2. 0
        20 August 2016 22: 05
        How much I read your nonsense, so much I understand that you,
        veteran66
        it looks of course an interesting type, but your view of things is very similar to the look of sausage, of jeans that look at privileges, as a result, the sausage is rotten, the jeans are worn out, the privileges remain.
        And the essence of what happened with the country is this, the country is destroyed, in the country over 25 years the people have died out more than from Hitler, 90% of the property is in the hands of one hundred oligarchs, or, as they are more clearly called, nouveau riche-compradors, who don’t need you either, and the country needed only as a place from where resources are drained.
  16. +5
    19 August 2016 21: 01
    Quote: moskowit
    Real Patriots! They saw much further than we all ....

    Is it Pavlov and Yanaev? wassat Well, my friend you probably didn’t live during the GKChP ...
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +3
    19 August 2016 21: 22
    To bring tanks to the streets of Moscow, and even after Vilnius, was stupid beyond the reach. The GKChP turned out to be the most disciplined, who could be "substituted". I think that Gorbachev arranged everything himself. This is his style. Not one, of course, and with the support of the "world elite". We will never know the truth, but in fact there was a counter-revolution with the initial criminal (capitalist) accumulation. The rest were promised life like in Sweden. 25 years have passed. So what?!
  19. -2
    19 August 2016 21: 31
    Quote: Monos
    Yes, Prokhanov told about himself and nice, nice people. But a "good man" is not a profession.

    I reread the memoirs of almost all the surviving members of the Emergency Committee and I will say one thing, they all consider themselves heroes, beat themselves in the chest, (while lying like gray merens, confusing dates, time, who said what, etc., protruding their role ) that they were saving the Union.
    Saved from whom? Who authorized them, who supported? That's when Kiev went the same way, we shouted together about the junta, about the coup. And then what happened, not a coup ??? No clear goals, no unity of views, no managerial experience, so just sat down to drink a seagull - drank ...
    About the version of Mr. Prokhanov about Operation Perestroika, I did not find confirmation in the memoirs of any of the participants in the putsch.
    1. 0
      19 August 2016 21: 38
      Quote: avg-mgn
      that they were saving the Union.

      Yes, they saved from dismemberment not just the USSR, but centuries-old Russia, which for hundreds of years had been collected, developed, defended by our ancestors, and some nonentities who, at every hint of responsibility for what they have done, are always cowardly forgotten through the cracks "and we it has nothing to do with it, it's all the others' fault, "they decided to divide the country among themselves.
      The Union Treaty is the de facto division of the USSR into separate States.
      1. +1
        19 August 2016 22: 24
        Quote: tatra
        Yes, it was not just the USSR that was saved from dismemberment, but centuries-old Russia

        They always did not care about the USSR, and even more so about RUSSIA. They saved their place in power. And the quote below characterizes them 100%. How decisions are made so "We have decided." And as a speech about responsibility, or mutual responsibility, or a reference to the collective responsibility of leading and guiding
        Quote: tatra
        , and some insignificant things that with every hint of responsibility for what they did
  20. -1
    19 August 2016 21: 41
    I can’t understand what kind of joy was happy then? where did it come from? Grown in Gorbachev tubes, or what?

    But the Satanist Yeltsin could not be allowed into Moscow in any way. Error. Fatal.
  21. +1
    19 August 2016 21: 44
    You know, in those days I was a green lieutenant of the USSR Air Force! I just graduated, I had my whole life ... was ...
  22. +2
    19 August 2016 21: 48
    Quote: tatra

    Yes, it was not just the USSR that was saved from dismemberment, but centuries-old Russia

    How so? You forgot that a referendum was held, where the people decided - to be the Union, and where in their program document at least a link to the decision of the people? Having brought tanks to the streets of Moscow, these people finally set Russia up by portraying it as a monster.

    1. In accordance with Article 127 of the Constitution of the USSR and Article 2 of the Law of the USSR “On the Legal Regime of a State of Emergency” and meeting the demands of the general public about the need to take the most decisive measures to prevent society from slipping into a national disaster, ensuring law and order, introduce a state of emergency in certain areas of the USSR for a period of 6 months from 4 hours Moscow time on 19 August 1991 years.
    Save not by force but by the mind.
    1. +1
      19 August 2016 22: 35
      Quote: avg-mgn
      How so?

      Yes, in such a way that they wanted to stop the signing of the Union Treaty on the dismemberment of the USSR.
  23. +1
    19 August 2016 22: 10
    The anti-people state - these are the gains of the August coup, they stole and bent the country ... and the people are silent, while they are silent!
  24. +5
    19 August 2016 22: 12
    Quote: demotivator
    How can you forget this !? I remember that day well, I served then in sunny Baku. The first reports of events in Moscow inspired some hope that the chaos and chaos in the country created by Gorbachev and his associates would finally end. However, hopes for the best were not destined to come true, and the farce with a coup ended in nothing. More precisely, the collapse of the once mighty state. Then there was our Russian Maidan in 1991, the second, tragic part of this performance will be already in 1993. And then it won't be funny at all. The events of August 1991 are misunderstood or deliberately called an attempt at a right-wing anti-constitutional coup of the State Emergency Committee. In our time of inverted, distorted, meanings, they must be understood exactly the opposite. It was an attempt to thwart the right-wing, anti-constitutional coup. Unsuccessful attempt. As a result, an operation was carried out in the USSR in the interests of the United States to dismember the country and renounce socialism. According to the methods of its implementation, it was in its pure form an "orange revolution", when using the impulse of the people, the desire for positive changes, those who used this impulse for their own selfish purposes came to power, destroyed socialism and created capitalism, which is now destroying Russia.
    Unfortunately, then many, especially in Moscow, Leningrad and other large cities, sincerely believed that it was impossible to continue living the way we lived then, which was worse than the USSR in the history of mankind, the country did not exist, and therefore it must be destroyed. Why they managed to fool the people is a separate question. But the fact remains - the great country was destroyed under the "Swan Lake", the whistle and hooting of the crowd.

    Yes. The hooting of the crowd was still what!
    And as to why they managed to fool the people, so the people at that moment were not against the Union, they wanted to be equal to those who were through the back door, but without a queue they received benefits. The people wanted equality and open rules. Rules and systems without KUMOVISM and their own. Basically, naive romantics and "knowledgeable in the subject" were active. Personally, I supported the GKChP and do not consider it either legally or morally a coup.
    But the lessons from what happened, I feel, the current government has not learned! Therefore, it runs the risk of extinguishing the bonfire with the US Guard, if the Americans rock the situation, the NPO is no less and the work is in full swing.
    It bothers me that the authorities give so many reasons, such as Serdyukov, Medvedev’s pearl statements, the opening of the Yeltsin Center, the Mannerheim board ...
    Kumovstvo is vividly traced, everyone can see who heads the state companies, it is also known how and in what posts the daughters, sons and relatives of officials in state companies are attached. Information on million-dollar bonuses and golden parachutes in state-owned companies, except for bewilderment at the time of budget sequestration, does not cause anything else! And the officials in the regions! This is a song, they drive SUVs and premium cars for the state budget. Companies "theirs" master the state budget without bidding, in collusion. And it's all on the surface!
    Now they are actively, again, they will begin to yearn religion in the people. First they will cross it with power, then into education. Everything is straightforward according to the principles of the development of the feudal system!
    The saddest thing is that there are no obvious enemies either. Our government and officials themselves are swinging public opinion!
    And our President Putin V.V. , judging by Livanov, who was appointed the president's representative, he is not going to change anything. And apparently it doesn’t draw attention to the existing “pernicious” system in the state. This is sad!
    I mainly support and admire V.V. Putin in foreign policy (except for the situation in Ukraine), but negatively assess the president’s domestic and personnel policies in Russia.
  25. +1
    19 August 2016 22: 19
    To understand what happened in those days, what the GKChP pushed us to, read if possible:

    http://www.ru-90.ru/node/475
    1. 0
      19 August 2016 23: 25
      Everything was planned correctly, but did nothing.
  26. +4
    19 August 2016 22: 54
    no words to express their contempt and hatred of the creatures that destroyed the Union!
    1. 0
      20 August 2016 20: 37
      Free It seems to me that their life is not as easy as it seems to many! The people cursed them and this is how their health affects both their children and the children of their children! And they feel it and live with it! You damn Twa-i!
      1. 0
        20 August 2016 21: 57
        Well, how loud, but not impressive ... because you still believe the same and the same that the tunnels are all these Radzinsky, Svanidze, Yavlinsky and other yasins with meadow and Chubais.
        1. 0
          20 August 2016 22: 28
          Yes, I’m telling you, look at all my old comments, it will take 10 minutes! These are my enemies and states!
          1. 0
            20 August 2016 23: 05
            Repeat?
            I repeat ... you repeat all those myths and gossip that speak ultrasound, all of which I have indicated.
            How do you keep their eternal lie and your, as you say, their rejection in general?
        2. 0
          20 August 2016 23: 26
          What myths do I repeat? And what a lie verbatim!
  27. +3
    19 August 2016 23: 21
    That after a fight with fists, and not with fists, but with tongues scratching ... We all pissed off the Union! Such are the things. Not to waste the rest of the Russian Empire, a fragment of the Union-Russia! But for this you need to act. And in the elections to vote for statists, for the true patriots of the country. And this, anyway, the Communists and close to them in their views.
    1. 0
      20 August 2016 20: 40
      The communists were already! And now we are in the jo-e!
      1. 0
        20 August 2016 21: 55
        And you, therefore, in jo ... because you did not listen to the Communists, confusing them with the Yeltsins, Gorbachevs and other Yakovlevs.
        You listened to Svanidz, Brewers, Radzinsky, Yavlinsky, Radzikhovsky, Rozovsky, Reichelhaus and Kublanov, Venedictors and Latin, well, in general, the whole set of shifters.
        And now yes, you are in jo ....
        1. 0
          20 August 2016 22: 23
          What are you talking about? I won’t listen to such people! There’s no place for them to be stigmatized! They lie without dryness ..
          1. 0
            20 August 2016 23: 06
            Nevertheless, you listen to them. And repeat, split?
  28. -1
    20 August 2016 06: 21
    Have you forgotten about Pavlov’s reforms? His face too saints?
  29. +1
    20 August 2016 11: 44
    Don't tell me that someone is "broken". The one who broke was the traitor. Sorry, but when there are three corpses on one end of the scales, and on the other, the fate of the country, no one will stop in front of these corpses and even much more. Did the Soviet people stop in the 41st, having received several hundred dead and a million prisoners? No, let's go to the end. I also point out Tiananmen constantly. Therefore, I do not believe that someone could pass.
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. 0
    20 August 2016 16: 33
    Quote: veteran66
    you should be able to drink and sell, try to steam a primitive product in a competitive environment. And in the absence of healthy competition, a direct path to stagnation.

    The words of the patented huckster, with a clear anti-Soviet, Russophobic position of the western sample.
    And he still talks about the fact that he felt bad in the USSR, of course, the huckster, liars and those who wanted to have primitive, read poor-quality, read stolen goods to be stolen, were kept in prison.
    1. 0
      21 August 2016 09: 35
      Isn't it a shame to say about a patented huckster?
      It is a pity that the cons removed ...
      Read your posts, and appreciate the style and manner of communication ...
  32. 0
    20 August 2016 17: 46
    g1v2,
    They do not report on the contents of the decree and the reasons for the creation of the State Emergency Committee, but comment on how Yanaev's hands were trembling. At that time, many not only trembling hands, but their knees bent when Yeltsin signed a decree on the dissolution of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the primary party organizations at enterprises and organizations on Gorbachev’s filing on 23.08.91 ... But the documents were never given, in particular executed by Gorbachev The agreement on the creation of the Economic Union of Independent States, which provides for the division of the USSR into "sovereign states", which led to the creation of the State Emergency Committee. However, the essence and content of the Economic Union is still unknown to the public. Treaty establishing the Economic Union of Independent States

    We note right away that the Treaty on the Establishment of the Economic Union is provided for by the Transition to Market program, the US Harvard Project, and the Economic Union of Sovereign Republics section (pp. 16–26). We will also reveal the program “Transition to the market” and see what is actually provided for by the Economic Union (p. 17):

    “The following principles are laid in the foundation of the Economic Union:
    1. The Economic Union is based on the principles of equality of members of the Union - sovereign states that have voluntarily joined it.
    2. The basis of the economy is an entrepreneur, an enterprise, increasing their property and thereby national wealth ...
    http://www.sovross.ru/articles/1444/25813
  33. 0
    20 August 2016 17: 54
    Quote: housewife
    Dear Mr. Prokhanov, very talentedly glorified himself in the article. They always tried to destroy Russia with the help of coups and riots. Something is always happening in Moscow. What? Yes, power is shared by those with these. Rampant Satan. Poddaknu Prokhanov - only God keeps Russia. Have the people been duped? In the sense of? It was quiet here in a province far from the capitals. Yes, we only know what will be said on TV and what is in our place. Why do they always try to solve everything with blood? Do they need a sacred sacrifice? What is this - Satanism? why after the 17th year there was a civil war, but not in the 90s? And in the 17th, people lost property, and those that did not have, hoped to get it. And in the 90s - what did people lose? This is what Chubais said. About privatization. All the same division "Nobody was going to give anything to the people. We had to take away the property from the communists. We took it away. And the people didn't have anything and now they don't, so the people didn't suffer" and you can at least bombard me with your minuses and accuse me of illiteracy , but if right tomorrow there will again be something like 93, the people will be silent again. Okay, who has that - I have a Holiday today. Transfiguration. Which no coups will take away from me.

    The ostrich’s position, the position is about nothing. The position justifying the state crime committed by Yeltsin and Gorbachev.
    1. 0
      21 August 2016 09: 39
      What do you see as an excuse for a state crime? If you hang all the labels, give evidence of this. And then you recall Maidan agitators more and more in the style of speech logic.
      1. 0
        21 August 2016 09: 45
        Article 64. Treason to the Motherland

        a) Cheating on the motherland, that is, an act intentionally committed by a citizen of the USSR to the detriment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity or state security and defense of the USSR: switching to the enemy’s side, espionage, issuing state or military secrets to a foreign state, fleeing abroad or refusing to return because of borders in the USSR, rendering assistance to a foreign state in conducting hostile activities against the USSR, as well as a conspiracy to seize power, -

        the applicable sentence is deprivation of liberty for a term of ten to fifteen years with confiscation of property or the death penalty with confiscation of property.
        https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D1%8B
        %D0%B9_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81_%D0%A0%D0%A1%D0%A4%D0%A1%D0%A0_1960
        _%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0/%D0%9E%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8
        F_%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C._%D0%93%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0_1
        Read, teach, but at the same time so that you don’t chat here, set out to find out for yourself why this is all, CANCELED exactly in 1996, when the very person to whom the country owes the collapse was in power ..
  34. 0
    20 August 2016 18: 52
    tatra,
    Mordvin 3,
    and all not lieutenants began to serve?
    1. 0
      20 August 2016 20: 34
      When such talkers like you fill in, that the lieutenant got 150 r and if he only had enough water for a liquid soup, it becomes clear who writes this nonsense.
      When such a verbiage is like you, the nightingale is struck by how bad things were in the Union. The meaning of the cries is clear, so those who snout to the bottom scream.
      1. 0
        21 August 2016 09: 42
        Once again about the howls and snouts in the fluff - the facts in the studio.
        If this does not happen, I, Yurganov Andrey Vladimirovich, I declare you a note balabol and an insignificant person.
        1. 0
          21 August 2016 10: 07
          urganov August 19, 2016 21:21
          And also to fight the legacy of the communist regime in the form of bureaucracy while trying to start doing real business, instead of singing the hosanna slogan: "Spring has passed, summer has come, thanks to the party for that."
          Reply More ...
          Do you, like a gramophone record, have not yet wiped yourself into holes, that you are repeating this nonsense like a mantra?
          Regarding your verbiage can only be so and not otherwise.
          Turn off your lying phonograph, and onto the street, if you see at least one Communist Party city committee on the street in any city or village, which supposedly still manages the village, city and economy in these places, I will believe you.
          But due to the fact that you can’t confirm this under any circumstances, you are lying impudently, shamelessly, showing that you are an accomplice to those who have lived on the ruins of the country, and continue this unclean business now.
          1. 0
            22 August 2016 09: 36
            Quote in the studio, in which I say that some kind of hill "to this day" and so on.
            And the evidence about the "accomplice. And then tired of his hysteria
    2. 0
      21 August 2016 09: 57
      urganov, well, explain this ... well, you so earnestly defend the grabbers from the Yeltsin’s cube, that you wonder right away, but are you one of those who raped then, a considerable jackpot in plundering the country, and even now you are putting your hand to it?

      Volgograd
      On August 18, desperate workers of the bankrupt Volgograd Drilling Equipment Plant went to a rally demanding wages. Hundreds of people with posters and banners gathered near the Tsaritsyn Opera House in the Krasnooktyabrsky district of the city with the hope of attracting the attention of the authorities to their problem.
      The slogans of the action: “Give our salary!”, “We need to pay rent, loans, for kindergartens!”, “Hold the VZBT leadership accountable!”.
      Debts to some VZBT employees reach 400 thousand rubles.
      Rostov region

      In the villages of Zverevo and Gukovo, Rostov Region, several hundred miners staged rallies demanding full payment of wage arrears and the issuance of laid ration coal. They especially draw attention to the fact that they do not intend to wait and receive a salary in installments, and the coal issued must be of proper quality.
      The mining enterprises at which they worked went bankrupt last year.
      On August 22, miners plan to begin an indefinite mass hunger strike.
      Omsk

      On August 18, a rally of workers at the Omsktransmash plant’s metallurgical workshops against pressure on workers took place.
      The reason for the disagreement between the leadership and the workers was the dismissal of the steel pourer and union activist Sergei Cherepanov, who, allegedly, did not use the respirator in his work.
      According to the protesters, the employer committed a forgery with instructions on labor protection to dismiss an employee who took an active part in the struggle for the labor rights of factory workers:
      “The situation with dismissal is now being examined by the district court, but we are sure that while the trial is over, other workers who are actively defending their rights may fall under a similar blow. The employer made it clear in his newspaper that he had fired the worker for contacting state bodies. ”

      Now tell us all a fairy tale about how this could have supposedly happened in the USSR, if you are insolent to lie? Just don’t give the data for 1991, and even for the 1990s you have already spoiled a lot of things at that time.
      1. 0
        22 August 2016 09: 39
        Again. Quote in the studio about my defense of the "Yeltsinov kubla". For lying and twitching, they used to beat the face.
  35. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      20 August 2016 20: 45
      What worries me is that you are not able to assimilate what is given to you, as an educational program must be carried out for an absolutely illiterate person.
      In 2012, the State Duma of the Russian Federation adopted the Federal Law of the Russian Federation No. 121-FZ on NPOs that perform the functions of a “foreign agent” and implement foreign programs on a corruption basis.
      President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin, commenting on the adoption of law No. 121-FZ, noted that the fifth column of “foreign agents” executing foreign programs on a corruption basis has been formed in the authorities. Their criminal activity of corruption has acquired a large-scale character, destabilizes the socio-economic situation in the country, has become not only the basis of enormous damage and loss of life, but also a threat to the national security of the country.
      http://www.sovross.ru/articles/1444/25813
      , just for you, that would at least understand something.
      After, give yourself the trouble, find on the Internet what the LIOTE plan is, just don’t immediately try to shout at the tide of liberal dope that all this is fake, as it turns out, this is what happened in reality ..
      Moreover, it continues to happen, in the matter of the collapse of the country.
      You can't squeal about the "communists" ...

      Russia wants to survive, will survive, but not in the garbage dump of capitalism.
      The development of society, dictates changes, even if at times, occurs for one reason or another, a rollback even to such savagery as the inexplicable type of criminal-official capitalism with elements of the oligarchy existing in our country.
      Putin, no matter what they say, in the zero years, wiped away part of the government, will be able to continue. Will be in history along with the best names, no, it will remain the shadow of the most drunken durila, to whom we owe a catastrophe.
      1. 0
        20 August 2016 21: 12
        I didn’t understand why they could delete this comment of mine? Did censorship appear? So it’s sad at all!
      2. 0
        20 August 2016 21: 38
        As far as your article is concerned, I have known this for a long time and everywhere it is already nonsense! The law on NPOs is soft in my opinion, organizations with financing from abroad that are engaged in information and political activities must be kicked out of the country! I can find the strength to find myself)
        1. 0
          20 August 2016 21: 48
          You read the article, and not just in the comment, to meditate is not my task.
          1. 0
            20 August 2016 22: 11
            Well, excuse me, everything that is written in these articles has long been known to me winked
            1. 0
              20 August 2016 23: 07
              And you didn’t understand anything?
      3. 0
        20 August 2016 21: 47
        And you read my profile comments winked Maybe you will understand what I know and what not!
        1. 0
          20 August 2016 23: 47
          So when you, for yourself, find out why the animal, which was always drunk, but hungry for power, in 1998, expelled its slander from the Government, appointing Primakov, Maslyukov, then you can understand why you look stupid when you are yelling all sorts of rubbish against the Communists.
          Let me remind you that the country’s DEFAULT with this drunk could have ended in collapse, and for Primakov’s ECONOMY, Maslyukov, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, was responsible, who dragged the country from the abyss then. Will you be able to understand this?
          Well, at the expense of the answering machine, you yourself seem to be doing this, only in the role of a mediocre machine from EP.
          1. 0
            21 August 2016 00: 00
            I understood everything, but I won’t tell you so as not to offend! I thought you could discuss it .... but here our armor is strong and our tanks are fast!
            1. 0
              21 August 2016 00: 15
              Because there is nothing to say.
  36. 0
    20 August 2016 20: 25
    As K.S. Stanislavsky: "I don't believe, I don't believe." To publish a newspaper (unbending) money alone is not enough. If they wanted to close it, they would. Why didn't they close it? Whom were they afraid of? Nobody. And they did not shut it down on purpose so that it would continue to fool people, distract from the essence of events with its pathos and empty articles.
    Oh, I would like to quote the words of V.V. Putin: "Who told you that you are a writer?" Someone really said, probably in the center of Kabul. Isn't it a tree?
  37. 0
    20 August 2016 23: 19
    Bloodsucker,
    Do you even hint that I had to understand? That the West will not leave us until it is destroyed, that 97% of traitors are in power now, or that we can’t do anything without communists)
  38. 0
    20 August 2016 23: 40
    Bloodsucker,
    I have a feeling that I’m talking with an answering machine of the Communist Party’s election headquarters feel
    1. 0
      20 August 2016 23: 48
      Your atvopootchik from EP, smacks of nonsense.
  39. +1
    21 August 2016 22: 31
    Have they all been cursed three times to the seventh knee, and these and these! And we assholes lesson that did not relate to their country with such a pohuizmom ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"