Russia requested permission from Iran and Iraq to fly cruise missiles. Russian Tu-22М3 appeared at the Iranian base Hamadan

190
The Russian Defense Ministry sent to Iran and Iraq a request to use the airspace of these countries for the flight of cruise missiles, reports Interfax message of his military-diplomatic source.



“Last week, the Russian Defense Ministry sent requests to Iraq and Iran to use the airspace of these countries to fly cruise missiles,” the agency’s source said.

The publication notes that on August 15, exercises began in the Caspian Sea with the participation of the missile ships Tatarstan and Dagestan and the MRK Grad Sviyazhsk and Veliky Ustyug. According to the Ministry of Defense, “the training plans provide for verification of the ability of the Caspian forces flotilla "actions to resolve crisis situations that pose a threat to the country's military security, including of a terrorist nature."

“At the same time, in the Mediterranean Sea, a naval strike group consisting of small Serpukhov and Green Dol rocket ships is conducting an exercise in conjunction with permanent operational compound ships,” the agency notes.

Yesterday it became known that Russian Tu-22М3 Russian bombers appeared in Iran at the base of Hamadan. From there, the aircraft will fly into the air to attack the objects of terrorists in Syria.



The deployment of bombers and fighters on Iranian territory will give the Russian Aerospace Forces a number of advantages. "The military agreement with Tehran will reduce the time of flights by 60 percent," write the Arab media.



Russia requested permission from Iran and Iraq to fly cruise missiles. Russian Tu-22М3 appeared at the Iranian base Hamadan





  • RF Defense Ministry, https://twitter.com/WarfareWW
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

190 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +48
    16 August 2016 09: 24
    Barmoley will be toughened hard! Syria will be closer from Hamadan, the bomb load will increase, diapers will have to be changed more often by the women! laughing . wassat
    1. +46
      16 August 2016 09: 27
      Quote: Blackberry
      They will harshly bomb the Barmolei!
      And before that, they were softly bombed? Down pillows, I suppose?
      But the fact that the Backfires, based on Hamadan, can now also carry bombs on an external sling - this is a definite plus for us, and a fatal minus for the shaitans.
      1. -19
        16 August 2016 09: 30
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Down pillows, I suppose?

        The excrement of Kerry, Obama, and Cleton.
      2. +7
        16 August 2016 09: 36
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Quote: Blackberry
        They will harshly bomb the Barmolei!
        And before that, they were softly bombed? Down pillows, I suppose?
        But the fact that "Backfires" will now be able to carry bombs on an external sling is a definite plus for us, and a fatal minus for the shaitans.

        Well, you can't do that, dear "colleague"! Took the sentence out of the general context and joke: "And before that, what bomb-down pillows?" Comments need to be written to the place, if you were not able to write the first comment, then be so kind as not to sarcastically to the one who turned out to be faster than you!
        THIS DOES NOT PAINT YOUR MARISHAL TITLE! sad
        1. +20
          16 August 2016 09: 49
          Quote: Blackberry
          Comments need to be written to the place
          One should not write platitudes, for they have already overcome them with slogans and chants. Every second comment to similar messages: "soak, bury, roll out." Otherwise they don't know how to deal with terrorists without you.
          1. +34
            16 August 2016 09: 58
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            Quote: Blackberry
            Comments need to be written to the place
            One should not write platitudes, for they have already overcome them with slogans and chants. Every second comment to similar messages: "soak, bury, roll out." Otherwise they don't know how to deal with terrorists without you.

            And how, in your opinion, should a simple forum member react to the news about the Russian carcass based at Iranian airfields? Should have led TTX Tu-22 M3? To write thoughtful comments about the fact that Iran plays its game and promotes its interests in Armenia, without particularly looking at Russia? I simply wrote that the bomb load on the carcasses will increase and as a result, the barmolei will have more problems than before!
            1. -8
              16 August 2016 10: 06
              Quote: Blackberry
              And how, in your opinion, should a simple forum member react to the news about the Russian carcass based at Iranian airfields?

              And you read the comment below (from the user avt, today 09:46).
              This is for you as an example.
              1. +9
                16 August 2016 10: 21
                Quote: oborzevatel
                Quote: Blackberry
                And how, in your opinion, should a simple forum member react to the news about the Russian carcass based at Iranian airfields?

                And you read the comment below (from the user avt, today 09:46).
                This is for you as an example.

                I do not understand your idea at all. The forum member avt only confirmed my first comment, he does not refute it. I am quoting the forum member avt: "Obviously, a jump airfield was needed, now with refueling and loading in Iran they will polish more abruptly than when making air pretzels from Mozdok. "
                Now I am self-citing, which is not very good, but you left me no choice. My first comment: "Syria is closer from Hamadan, the bomb load will increase." hi
                1. -5
                  16 August 2016 11: 20
                  Quote: Blackberry
                  I did not understand your idea at all. Forum avt only confirmed my first comment, he does not refute it.

                  Well, they specifically answered you:
                  You should not write platitudes, for they have already overcome slogans and cripples. Every second comment to similar messages: "soak, bury, roll out." Otherwise they don't know how to deal with terrorists without you.
            2. jjj
              +5
              16 August 2016 10: 09
              It is not for nothing that they say to us: Earth to them - in peace!
              1. +10
                16 August 2016 10: 56
                Disagree stop. Earth im glassy good.
                1. +7
                  16 August 2016 11: 25
                  And I’ll add - the kingdom to them is underground)))
            3. +3
              16 August 2016 15: 38
              Quote: Blackberry
              And how, in your opinion, should a simple forum member react to the news about the Russian carcass based at Iranian airfields?


              Well, at least this way ... "again we relocated as always ... through ... one place" - again one aft ladder for the crew and everyone leaves through one lamp wassat
              1. 0
                16 August 2016 18: 36
                Quote: ancient
                and everyone goes out through one wassat lamp

                And what is there seven hundred lights?
                1. +2
                  16 August 2016 20: 08
                  Quote: olegyurjewitch
                  And what is there seven hundred lights?


                  No ... you just need to once try to climb from the commander's cup to the right one and then climb the ladder through the pravak lamp ... the questions will disappear by themselves ... well, the navigators have even funnier ... the operator needs to crawl over the navigator's middle rocket console ..... circus artists ... "rest" ... and if everyone is still in demi-season clothes or in armored wassat
      3. +15
        16 August 2016 09: 45
        Yes, twenty-four tons of "pillows" will help the barmen fall asleep forever !!! We did everything competently! And infa about the permission to use cruise missiles, generally a masterpiece! NATO will tense up in anticipation of where and what will be launched! Last time everything was quietly done (received permission) for the result, and now there is a double plus, the result and a psychic attack on the "partners", let them wait and guess!
        1. jjj
          +4
          16 August 2016 10: 10
          We’ll check at the same time: which NATO systems could detect launches
          1. 0
            16 August 2016 12: 24
            In the FSA, there is an organization called Geo-Prospecting, which works both for civilian use and for military use. Satellite resolution of images, firstly, is round-the-clock, and secondly, the quality of images that a fountain pen can see.
          2. +1
            16 August 2016 12: 38
            Quote: jjj
            We’ll check at the same time: which NATO systems could detect launches

            I don’t think that they will report to us ...
        2. +1
          16 August 2016 15: 40
          Quote: Hunter
          Yes, twenty-four tons of "pillows" will help the barmen fall asleep forever !!!


          Who told you that they will "wear" 24 tons belay You are not based in Iraq recourse
      4. avt
        +24
        16 August 2016 09: 46
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        And before that, they were softly bombed? Down pillows, I suppose?

        See how many dumped from the Tu-22 in the videos. Obviously, a jump airfield was needed, now with refueling and loading in Iran they will polish more abruptly than when making air pretzels from Mozdok. The kneading began in Syria not for children - I found a scythe on a stone - we agreed with the Iranians, and they also have little to lose earth, but here in full duplicate spirits with their advisers will be. And we prepared and equipped not sour spirits. While they cleared the land and Palmyra, they really dragged spirits in the campaign in Idlib - the battles are not comic for Allepo.
        1. icy
          +6
          16 August 2016 09: 57
          If you look at the map: Hamadan - a pass in the mountains, there are 2 roads from the Caspian. I hope that the carcasses taking off from Hamadan will be loaded on all 22 tons.
          1. +17
            16 August 2016 10: 07
            Quote: icas
            If you look at the map: Hamadan - a pass in the mountains, there are 2 roads from the Caspian. I hope that the carcasses taking off from Hamadan will be loaded on all 22 tons.

            ... and everything at hand they will have the farthest point of Aleppo 1000 km. ... 9t. on the external + bomb bay 8x1500 = 21 tons ... hi
            1. +10
              16 August 2016 11: 46
              You can still add that now it will be possible to turn around, good and Hamine is near, and then while 3 is there for hours, 3 is back, and then you took off and after 15 for minutes you can tickle nerves. Dropped a couple of wings and you can wait, there will be intelligence reports that at the bottom of Allah they thank that they survived this time, and you can be upset from the hatches.
              1. +1
                16 August 2016 15: 47
                Quote: Gomel
                you can still add that now it will be possible to circle, good and Khmeimim is nearby, and then until 3 hours there, 3 hours back


                For 6 hours flew ONLY Tu-22R / RD soldier
                Here you can .. ("circle" a little) but depending on how many "goodies" you take on board wink
                About the reset from "hedgehogs" .. FORGET !!! soldier
            2. +3
              16 August 2016 15: 44
              Quote: Inok10
              . and everything at hand they will have the farthest point of Aleppo 1000 km


              You need one of the zhvuhs or 36 250-k or 8 x 1,5 .. and if together, you also need an Il-76 tanker with a connected fueling hose through the centralized gas tank on a "rigid coupling" wassat
              1. +5
                16 August 2016 18: 23
                Quote: ancient
                You need one of two or 36 250-k or 8 for 1,5 ..

                ... 24 tons. This is overload, I agree, and without accelerators there is no take-off ... a fact and I will not argue ... 21 tons at a range of up to 1000 km. real fact:
                FAB-1500 x 8 bomb bay on KD4-105A + external on MBD-3-U9 36 x FAB-250 = 21 t.
                FAB-500 bomb bay on KD3-22R + external on MBD-3-U9 36 places = 42 pcs. all the same 21 tons ...
                112 tons normal, we have 116 tons in our case with 35 tons of fuel out of 53,5 possible and 21 combat ... loaded, we go one way, back light ... 116 - 21 - 25 = 70 less than normal landing 78 ... I could be mistaken in the details, but it all fits together ... in photo 9 KD3-22R x 4 OFAB-250 = 9000 t. hi
                1. +1
                  16 August 2016 20: 19
                  Quote: Inok10
                  21 tons with a range of up to 1000 km. real fact:


                  1. Empty 70 tons.
                  2.BK (in your 21 tons).
                  3. Fuel you left 31 tons.
                  4. Hourly consumption 6 tons / hour / engine.
                  5. Range to the target of 1000 km (speed 900 km / h).
                  We get purely back and forth in the horizon to hit the road and there are only 7 tons of fuel left .... but there were left unaccounted for such "little things" as:
                  1. Start-up and warm-up with control check.
                  2. Taxiing
                  3. Take off on the MFR engine operation (in another way, well, he does not know how).
                  4. True, then we switch to recruitment at the MBFR, but anyway.
                  Well, also on arrival, the construction of the approach scheme.
                  At 7%, the navigational reserve is generally silent.
                  So from your 21 tons, throw tons so 7th ... it will be the most wink

                  If you hung the Hedgehogs "by 15% to the range, you can safely" add " wassat
                  This is so ... if quickly and on the fingers ... and .. KD-3 22P ... (trimmed under 3 suspension stations) were placed only on the middle row).
                  Well, for "show off" or window dressing ".... and" the cow was taken to the cinema in the bomb bay ") wassat
                  1. +3
                    16 August 2016 22: 47
                    Quote: ancient
                    1. Empty 70 tons.

                    maximum 124, with a maximum fuel of 53,5 - maximum combat not more than 11,5 that is empty - 59 ... 70, or rather 69,5 is TU-22M0; 66,5 is TU-22M1 / M2 ... "beyond the river" generally consider TU-22M3 - 50 tons, took 60 tons ... more real ... hi
                    Quote: ancient
                    5. Range to the target of 1000 km (speed 900 km / h).

                    ... up to 1000 km. it was indicated ... 10 tons of stock from empty weight and fuel was 35 ... and Damascus airport was 300 km from the extreme point of Aleppo. with a strip of 3,5 km. ... in general I do not consider it necessary to break spears, I hope we understand each other ... hi
                    1. 0
                      17 August 2016 20: 55
                      Quote: Inok10
                      maximum 124


                      This is with 4 boosters.

                      Quote: Inok10
                      with a maximum fuel of 53,5


                      Tried it once .. "excrement" .. it's not worth the candle wink

                      Quote: Inok10
                      that is, empty - 59 ... 70, or rather 69,5 is TU-22M0; 66,5 is TU-22M1 / M2.


                      2-ki ALL my life were heavier than triples .. at least 0-ki, even units soldier

                      Quote: Inok10
                      ... "beyond the river" generally consider TU-22M3 - 50 tons, took 60 tons ... more real ...


                      This is probably after 1 liter on the nose drunk? wassat So some of them talk about the 75 mm cannon in the nose and about the 2 12,7 mm machine gun under the optic guard, but the vidicon o15t, so generally ... a black and white TV with broadcasting local channels lol


                      Quote: Inok10
                      10 tons of stock from empty weight and fuel was 35 ... and Damascus airport from the extreme point of Aleppo, 300 km. with a strip of 3,5 km. ... in general I do not consider it necessary to break spears, I hope we understand each other ...


                      This is theory and ... dreams ... but using a long-range bomber on targets in the area of ​​300 km radius ... this is something VERY "new" in tactics ... better right away ... wassat
          2. 0
            16 August 2016 15: 41
            Quote: icas
            will be loaded on all 22 t.


            Do not hope, although 14-16 tons is real! soldier
        2. +1
          16 August 2016 10: 37
          Quote: avt

          See how many dumped from the Tu-22 in the videos. The jump airfield was obviously needed, now with refueling and loading in Iran they will polish more abruptly than when making air pretzels from Mozdok.

          Judging by the video, 3 tons were dumped, now the distance has decreased from about 4800 km to 2000 km, this is there and back, which means the load will increase.
          1. +1
            16 August 2016 15: 47
            Quote: figvam
            it back and forth, which means the load will increase.


            You can 14-16 tons! soldier
          2. avt
            +2
            16 August 2016 16: 53
            Quote: figvam
            Judging by the video, 3 tons were dumped

            It seems like there was a report - they hung 500sotki, it began to be 4-5 tons request So it's straight empty 22nd to drive! And if there are also "quarters" - 250 and even less! Here is the result of cutting off the refueling system in the air sad Well, now it’ll be funnier when somewhere around 20 pick up and loose in perfume!
      5. +27
        16 August 2016 09: 56
        Before that it was 8 250 from the Carcass. Su-34 with Khmemima will carry more. Plus, the Carcasses have problems with the resource of engines (they are not produced, they will only be repaired, and the replacement for NK-32 with bright future 2020 +). That is, driving through the Caspian Sea for the sake of 8x250 is very costly, primarily for the resource. And here much closer + you can take three times as many gifts.
        1. +3
          16 August 2016 10: 09
          Quote: donavi49
          Before that it was 8 250 from the Carcass. Su-34 with Khmemima will carry more. Plus, the Carcasses have problems with the resource of engines (they are not produced, they will only be repaired, and the replacement for NK-32 with bright future 2020 +). That is, driving through the Caspian Sea for the sake of 8x250 is very costly, primarily for the resource. And here much closer + you can take three times as many gifts.

          Why 8? Like 12?
          1. +4
            16 August 2016 10: 43
            No.

            First installation of 2x3.
            The second is either 2x1 or 2x2.

            Raids 14 numbers with 2x3 + 2x2 - 10 bombs. There, by the way, the M3M cab also lit up wink
            1. +5
              16 August 2016 11: 51
              1.06 and 2.06 Cab
              By the way, the information support takes into account the criticism of the beginning of the Syrian Videoconferencing Company (I remember there were complaints of idiots that "old bombs, old missiles, do not get into the cross"), the operators now put a cross in the center
              destruction.
            2. +4
              16 August 2016 11: 57
              Donavi, it is clear that you are a person in the subject, and this is a plus. It is tiresome to read a list of "balsh" specialists.
            3. 0
              16 August 2016 15: 50
              Quote: donavi49
              First installation of 2x3.
              The second is either 2x1 or 2x2.


              What does this mean? belay
              You "imagined" this ... a typical navigator's cabin with "Hephaestus" soldier
        2. +5
          16 August 2016 10: 40
          Yes, 12 pcs. - 250 kg and 3000 kg.
          1. +6
            16 August 2016 10: 47
            Not. I gave an example above for example with 10 bombs.

            In any case, Su-34 from Khmemim will deliver both 10 and 12, much more quickly.

            Here is the Hindu MKI in the exercises immediately replaces 2 Tu-22.
            1. +3
              16 August 2016 11: 24
              Quote: donavi49
              Here is the Hindu MKI in the exercises immediately replaces 2 Tu-22.

              No need to juggle this Indian SU-30MKI, it could fly a couple of kilometers with such a bomb load to the test site with a minimum fuel supply.
              TU-22M3 fly hundreds of kilometers (if not thousands) to the point of ammunition drop over Syria. And indeed, of course, the use of bombers of this class is more of a political gesture.
              1. +1
                16 August 2016 13: 09
                AND? MKI flew from the base to the training ground, there 20-30 minutes circle.

                It’s also about Aleppo to fly with Hmemima.

                That is, the extra Su-30СМ / Su-34 will really replace even more than one Tu-22, and will make it much faster.
                1. +3
                  16 August 2016 19: 53
                  Quote: donavi49
                  AND? MKI flew from the base to the training ground, there 20-30 minutes circle.

                  Where does this information come from?
                  Quote: donavi49
                  It’s also about Aleppo to fly with Hmemima.

                  And to Der-ez-Zor from Khmeimin? But TU-22M3 fly if I'm not mistaken from Mozdok. At Khmeimin, their deployment is said to be impossible.
                  Quote: donavi49
                  That is, the extra Su-30СМ / Su-34 will really replace even more than one Tu-22, and will make it much faster.

                  Will you supply ammunition like the Su-30SM / Su-34? Driving the Syrian Express across the straits?
                  so there is so much to bring and not just for airplanes.
                  TU-22M3 in Iran can either be supplied with the Iranian range of ammunition or the necessary ammunition can be quickly and conveniently delivered through the Caspian.
                2. 0
                  16 August 2016 20: 24
                  Quote: donavi49
                  AND? MKI flew from the base to the training ground, there 20-30 minutes circle.

                  It’s also about Aleppo to fly with Hmemima.

                  And the return journey was taken into account. At 20-30 minutes of flight at maximum bomb load, the fuel will almost completely run out. Therefore, you need a dosing aircraft. And if TU-22 can’t land at the Khmeimim airbase, will refueling planes land?
                  1. +1
                    16 August 2016 20: 52
                    Quote: Lord Blacwood
                    . At 20-30 minutes of flight at maximum bomb load, the fuel will almost completely run out.


                    Well, you got a little excited wink
                    And who told you that the Tu-22M3 cannot land in Hmeimim? belay MIL-76 and An-124 sit down freely wink
            2. +4
              16 August 2016 13: 19
              Quote: donavi49
              Not. I gave an example above for example with 10 bombs.

              In any case, Su-34 from Khmemim will deliver both 10 and 12, much more quickly.

              Here is the Hindu MKI in the exercises immediately replaces 2 Tu-22.

              Hindu pours FAB-100, 26 pcs, 2600 kg.
            3. +6
              16 August 2016 14: 01
              You, dear, confuse the soft with the warm, although this is pleasant, but there is a significant difference between them.
              A capable carcass, from the Hamadan airfield, can take 24 tons aboard, if 250 kg each (69 pieces).
              The plane plows the area equivalent to 35 standard football fields with one blow with free-fall bombs. The capabilities of the Hephaestus sighting equipment allow a single bomb to hit the shed from a ten-kilometer height. The flight crews jokingly said, take "ACCEPT the GASHEFT" by PRESSING THE BUTTON.
              At the moment, judging by the news, "500" are used, AND MAYBE MORE, the second modification of 1954 -1970 RELEASE., Therefore, rusty.
              For many reasons, Russia needs to increase bombing, safe disposal,
              training of flight personnel, lack of expensive exercises, advertising that brings in many billion "rubles" American.
              By the way, before signing START-2, the USSR conducted the next tests of the TU-22M2, we saw its capabilities from satellites (test data) and insisted that the USSR release no more than 30 pieces a year and remove the air refueling equipment.
              1. +1
                16 August 2016 16: 08
                Quote: Berkut752
                You, dear, confuse the soft with the warm, although this is pleasant, but there is a significant difference between them.
                A capable carcass, from the Hamadan airfield, can take 24 tons aboard, if 250 kg each (69 pieces).


                It's you, dear, you are confusing this with this one ...... If you load all 69 pieces, then your goal should be in the area of ​​the 4th spread (exaggerating, of course, but just to clarify the picture ... "oil" wassat )
                Well, get solitary, and even 10 km into the barn wassat Yesterday one taoki on an article about Tu-1650 "told" that it had a non-afterburner cruising mode of 2000 km / h ... this is somewhere in this series.
                The button is pressed only in one case .. when working on a signal from the provider, but not when working with "Hephaestus" wassat
          2. -1
            16 August 2016 16: 33
            Quote: figvam
            Yes, 12 pcs. - 250 kg and 3000 kg.


            250 is a caliber ... bomb weight 270kg wink
            1. -3
              16 August 2016 19: 35
              Quote: ancient
              250 is a caliber ... bomb weight 270kg wink

              The weight of the FAB-250 and OFAB-250 ranges from 250kg to 270kg, depending on the modifications. But the number 250 is definitely not a caliber.
              1. +1
                16 August 2016 20: 23
                Quote: Skifotavr
                But the number 250 is definitely not a caliber.


                I advise you to study the materiel! soldier
                1. -1
                  16 August 2016 22: 00
                  Quote: ancient
                  I advise you to study the materiel! soldier

                  Materiel yourself would not hurt to study if you even know what it is. And at the same time replenish the vocabulary.
      6. +7
        16 August 2016 10: 45
        "Backfires
        But what, do the planes no longer have a Russian name?
        1. +7
          16 August 2016 10: 55
          Quote: Orionvit
          But what, do the planes no longer have a Russian name?
          Excuse me, "the counter fell" laughing Come on get bored, really Backfire sounds good. And respect is aroused by sworn friends. Otherwise they would not have called the Tu-22M3 that way.
          1. +2
            16 August 2016 11: 16
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            really Backfire sounds good.



            I have always liked this NATO name for our Tu-22 ... As well as the products of the "Voevoda" - in the NATO style of Satan ...

            Black fire ... Satan ... Already in this a serious assessment of the enemy by this weapon can be seen ...
            1. 0
              16 August 2016 11: 28
              The plane is called return fire all the same.
              The black fire is this:
            2. +2
              16 August 2016 15: 49
              Not Blackfire, but Backfire - Backfire.
        2. -3
          16 August 2016 13: 19
          Quote: Orionvit
          But what, do the planes no longer have a Russian name?


          I wanted to show off and "farted" by chance.
        3. 0
          16 August 2016 20: 31
          Quote: Orionvit
          "Backfires
          But what, do the planes no longer have a Russian name?

          This name was given to our bombers by the "partners" from NATO.
      7. +3
        16 August 2016 10: 56
        You can’t imagine a better airfield. Runway length 2330 meters Height above sea level 1754 meters
        1. +4
          16 August 2016 11: 17
          Quote: Oleneboy_
          The length of the runway 2330 meters

          Almost 3900 m
        2. 0
          16 August 2016 20: 56
          Quote: Oleneboy_
          Height above sea level 1754 meters


          Self-negating definitions:
          How can you .. "you can't imagine better" with a runway length of only 2330 meters wassat and even at an altitude of almost 2 km? wassat
          Are you going to suspend one P-50-75 and refuel 2-3 tons of kerosene? wassat
      8. +3
        16 August 2016 11: 09
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        But the fact that the Backfires, based on Hamadan, can now also carry bombs on the external sling is a definite plus for us,



        Plus, the logistics for the delivery of fuel and ammunition will not be a problem ...
        Not that Hmeimim’s base across the straits ...
      9. +5
        16 August 2016 11: 31
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        And here is what the Backfires based on Hamadan

        The hour of reckoning is near!

        And more news in the topic -
        Representatives of the ISIS terrorist group (banned in the Russian Federation) managed on Wednesday (August 10) to infiltrate a US military base in northern Syria, killing and injuring dozens of American soldiers, as well as Kurdish fighters.

        According to an official statement published by the AMAC propaganda agency, this terrorist organization, its seven suicide bombers managed to attack the base, which is located in a residential area in Al-Farouk Dam. The base is a military center created by the United States, there were planned operations of the Syrian Democratic Forces to attack Manbij.

        Initially, the three so-called “shahids” detonated their bombs among the groups of Kurdish servicemen guarding the base, and then four others burst into the premises where the brutal massacre began. There, four jihadists killed and wounded at least 41 of an American soldier, as well as Kurdish militias, reports AMAK. Ultimately, all four militants were killed.

        http://topru.org/45352/ig-atakovalo-amerikancev-v-sirii-desyatki-pogibshix/
      10. +2
        16 August 2016 12: 54
        And why not use the TU-95 yet? After all, they have a longer range without refueling and will be more economical in fuel.
        1. +1
          16 August 2016 16: 09
          Quote: ramzes1776
          After all, they have a longer range without refueling and will be more economical in fuel.


          Because they are all MS or MSM soldier
      11. 0
        16 August 2016 15: 36
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        But the fact that the Backfires, based on Hamadan, can now also carry bombs on an external sling is a definite plus for us.


        They cannot ... because. "hedgehogs increase" consumption by 15%!
      12. -1
        16 August 2016 19: 09
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        But the fact that the Backfires, based on Hamadan, will now be able to carry bombs on the external sling

        So flying out of Russia and their bomb compartments were not completely buzzed.
    2. +33
      16 August 2016 09: 29
      Yesterday, it became known about the appearance of Russian Tu-22M3 bombers in Iran at the Hamadan base. From there, airplanes will fly into the air to strike at terrorist targets in Syria.
      Oh, how interesting ... If anyone doesn’t understand, the Russian STRATEGIC BOMBERS will be stationed on the Iranian Air Force Base ...
      Watching V.V.P. begins to compress the rings on the Middle East neck of the United States and its sixes. Yes, before the victory over the United States and the abomination that they have grown far in the Middle East, BUT what actions on the part of the Russian Federation ... Bravo! Even under the USSR, we could ONLY DREAM about at least a temporary deployment of our STRATEGs on the Iranian Air Force base ...
      1. +6
        16 August 2016 09: 40
        Quote: Now we are free
        Even under the USSR, we ONLY DREAM could at least temporarily deploy our STRATEGs on the Iranian Air Force base ..
        Well then, communist ideology entered into an insoluble conflict with fundamental Islam. And now we have no distinct ideology, and the Iranians are not so turned on Islamism. In addition, we were then allies of the enemy of the Persians - Iraq, and now where is that strong Saddam Iraq? Destroyed, including with the tacit consent of Russia. As, however, and the Libyan Jamahiriya.
        I add that one should not so delightfully evaluate the current successes of Russia in the Middle East. Remember what the influence of the USSR in this region was earlier and moderate a bit of enthusiasm. In the old days, the Americans did not have any thoughts to use direct military force there.
        1. +8
          16 August 2016 09: 50
          For the sake of truth, if not for Khrushchev’s idiotic steps, Iran would have had a completely different policy than the one that took place. And comedology, with Islam in Iran, has nothing to do with it ..
          1. +3
            16 August 2016 10: 02
            Quote: The Bloodthirster
            , if not Khrushchev’s idiotic steps, with Iran would be a completely different policy than the one that took place
            And what prevented the establishment of relations with Iran in the post-Khrushchev times? I think it’s just the Islamic revolution. It was not just that Ayatollah Khomeini called the USSR "the little Satan", however, in contrast to the USA, which he called "the great Satan."
            1. 0
              16 August 2016 11: 09
              What hindered .. yes it hindered, heaped up a corn vegetable so much that it made problems that the USA dug in tightly and after that they managed to push Iran and the Union into Afghanistan ..
              1. -1
                16 August 2016 12: 40
                Minus as a confirmation of ignorance from the provider?
                Or an insult to the corn lap-Trotskyist Khrushchev?
          2. +2
            16 August 2016 10: 57
            Our country needs to strengthen friendship with Iran in every way, because it is not only our ally in the fight against our opponents of the United States by other NATO countries, the Israeli regimes of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, other bandits and friends and sponsors of terrorism on Earth
            In addition, Iran is a huge market not only for our weapons but also for our industry and agriculture, and the sale of our products there gives jobs to tens of thousands of workers and billions in budget revenues.
            And if earlier Iranian F-14s simply escorted our aircraft for safety and our SU-34s were based on the Iranian air base TAB-3, now we have reached a new level - basing our bombers on Iran friendly to us.
            Iranian F-14 Tomket accompanies our strategic bomber TU-95

            SU-34 at the air base TAB-3
            1. +3
              16 August 2016 11: 09
              Russian Tu-22 deployed at Iran’s Hamadan airbase
      2. +4
        16 August 2016 09: 41
        Yes, to have such an ally as Iran on BV is hard to overestimate.
      3. +9
        16 August 2016 09: 42
        Quote: Now we are free
        Watching V.V.P. begins to compress the rings on the Middle East neck of the United States and its sixes. Yes, before the victory over the United States and the abomination that they have grown far in the Middle East, BUT what actions on the part of the Russian Federation ... Bravo! Even under the USSR, we could ONLY DREAM about at least a temporary deployment of our STRATEGs on the Iranian Air Force base ...


        an absolute plus ... if Khmeimim is not yet ready for strategists, then from Iran they cover what radius ... from Russia with love. laughing
      4. UVB
        +10
        16 August 2016 09: 45
        If anyone doesn’t understand, the Russian STRATEGIC BOMBERS will be deployed on the Iranian Air Force Base.
        In fact, the strategists are Tu-95 and 160, and the Tu-22 is a long-range bomber.
        1. +5
          16 August 2016 10: 36
          Hello Novorossam Victor! hi
          Quote: UVB
          In fact, the strategists are Tu-95 and 160, and the Tu-22 is a long-range bomber.

          To your comment Vit-
          It is customary to call a bomber strategic only when it has an intercontinental range (over 5000 km) and is capable of using nuclear weapons. For example, aircraft Tu-22M, Tu-16 and B-47 are capable of using strategic nuclear weapons, but do not have an intercontinental flight range, and therefore are often called long-range bombers. (In fact, such an application of the term “long-range bombers” is incorrect, since such bombers, without having an intercontinental flight range, are technically strategic bombers as well. That is, intercontinental and so-called “Distant” bombers are nothing more than two subclasses of strategic bombers.)
          hi
      5. +2
        16 August 2016 09: 53
        If anyone doesn’t understand, the Russian STRATEGIC BOMBERS will be deployed on the Iranian Air Force Base ...

        an absolute plus ... if Khmeimim is not yet ready for strategists, then from Iran they oh what radius they cover ...


        I am wildly sorry, but where did you read / hear about the deployment of strategic bombers in Iran?
        1. +5
          16 August 2016 09: 57
          Quote: Incomprehensible
          I am wildly sorry, but where did you read / hear about the deployment of strategic bombers in Iran?


          http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2788112

          Tu-22M3 aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces arrived at the Iranian airfield Hamadan - from there they will fly to air strikes on the positions of militants in Syria. On this, reports the TV channel "Russia 24", reported by the Iranian and Arab media.
          The deployment of bombers and fighters in Iranian territory will give the Russian Air Force a number of advantages. According to Arab media, a military agreement with Tehran will reduce flight time by 60 percent.
          Exclusive: #Russian AF deployed to Hamedan airbase in #Iran being prepared for airstrikes on terrorists in #Syria pic.twitter.com/8EYgA272zi
          - Warfare Worldwide (@WarfareWW) 15 de agosto de 2016
      6. -2
        16 August 2016 10: 10
        Quote: Now we are free
        Yesterday, it became known about the appearance of Russian Tu-22M3 bombers in Iran on the basis of Hamadan ...
        ... If anyone doesn’t understand, the Russian STRATEGIC BOMBERS will be deployed on the Iranian Air Force Base ...

        For example, I did not understand.
        I don’t understand, since when did Tu-22M3 become STRATEGIC BOMBERS?
        Learn mat.chast, my dear.
        And then you’re bullshitting.
        And what would a simple layman think after reading your comment?
        That the "strategists" flew to Iran?
        1. +13
          16 August 2016 10: 22
          Quote: oborzevatel
          For example, I did not understand.
          I don’t understand, since when did Tu-22M3 become STRATEGIC BOMBERS?
          Learn mat.chast, my dear.
          And then you’re bullshitting.
          And what would a simple layman think after reading your comment?
          That the "strategists" flew to Iran?


          and a simple layman, like me, doesn’t distinguish a strategist from a dalnyak ... The main thing is that Iran provided the base .. that’s what the layman thinks ... and I think there’s nothing scary in the reservation or not knowing the difference between an individual commentator .. or you yourself are an expert in all industries .. just a little bit and nothing really.
          1. -3
            16 August 2016 11: 16
            Quote: vorobey
            and a simple layman like me does not distinguish a strategist from a dalnyak ...

            Do not equal other inhabitants on your own.
            Quote: vorobey
            and I think there’s nothing terrible in the reservation or not knowing the difference between an individual commentator

            Do not know - it’s better to keep quiet, and do not mislead other ordinary inhabitants.
            And then next time "Iskander" will be included in the Strategic Missile Forces, and you will eagerly write and admire about it on "VO".
            Quote: vorobey
            or you yourself are an expert in all sectors .. just a little bit and nothing really.

            Self-criticism in its address has not prevented anyone.
            Thank you for attention.
            1. +2
              16 August 2016 11: 35
              Quote: oborzevatel
              Do not equal other inhabitants on your own.


              That’s why we beat ChVakusha because of their conceit and arrogance ... laughing Are you by any chance not one of them?
          2. 0
            16 August 2016 11: 31
            Quote: vorobey
            and a simple layman like me is a strategist from far away does not distinguish ...


            Hmm ... The other day I went wrong with this word to the Tu-22M ... We picked it as soon as we could ...

            But in general, what are we arguing about?
            Refuel Tu-22M in flight - here's the strategist ...
            True, I do not know if there is a refueling system at THESE or not ...
            Because of all these agreements, they were removed at one time, as a result of which the Backfires became distant, and not strategic ...

            But, as far as I understand, in the design bureau and in the factories all documentation remained ...
            Especially now all Tu-22M3 will undergo modernization at the plants ...
            So return them to the air refueling system that used to be on them ...
            1. +2
              16 August 2016 13: 14
              Quote: weksha50
              Refuel Tu-22M in flight - here's the strategist ...

              Under the START-2 agreement, refueling equipment with the Tu-22 was dismantled. Installing back is a matter of several hours, the only question is whether this equipment remains and in what condition.
              1. 0
                16 August 2016 16: 14
                Quote: siber
                Installing back is a matter of several hours, the only question is whether this equipment remains and in what condition.


                I’m saying - now all Tu-22 will undergo modernization at the plants ...
                If you fool all the documentation, etc. if they’re not destroyed, they’ll most likely be installed ...
              2. +1
                16 August 2016 16: 14
                Quote: siber
                Installing back is a matter of several hours, the only question is whether this equipment remains and in what condition.


                Delirium of pure water, because :
                1. This equipment still needs to be manufactured.
                2. To retrofit aircraft in KAPO conditions with a fuel system and automation (no less than a month)! soldier
                1. +4
                  16 August 2016 16: 52
                  Quote: ancient
                  1. This equipment still needs to be manufactured.

                  In terms of manufacturing, I agree that in our Russian habit it is most likely that what has been dismantled is destroyed (in one way or another). You have to get the documentation from the archives, digitize, search for the manufacturer - this is not a quick matter.
                  Quote: ancient
                  2. To retrofit aircraft in KAPO conditions with a fuel system and automation (no less than a month)!

                  Then I was apparently in a hurry - installation of the dismantled equipment back is most likely possible only on those machines where it stood before removal. On airplanes manufactured and modernized after the conclusion of START-2, seats are most likely occupied by other equipment. So really only through KAPO.
                  Well, another question immediately comes out that has not yet been discussed - but how many Tu-22 crews have access to refuel? How many crews were trained in principle?
                  Well, again - how does this fit in with START-2? We are still doing it.
                  1. 0
                    16 August 2016 16: 55
                    Quote: siber
                    where it stood before removal.


                    There were 10 of them in total (I mean 3) soldier soldier
                  2. +1
                    16 August 2016 21: 41
                    Quote: siber
                    and how many Tu-22 crews have access to refuel? How many crews were trained in principle?
                    Well, again - how does this fit in with START-2? We are still doing it.



                    Probably, training will start from scratch ...
                    But, in general, have all the technical documentation on the fueling equipment been destroyed or merged?

                    The ancient one writes that in a month it would be possible to equip ...

                    It would be true what and how ...
                  3. 0
                    16 August 2016 22: 22
                    We cannot. Until we really get out of the treaty. Let's do it now - high "difficult partners" will raise such that they will be supported by the hesitant ones.
            2. 0
              17 August 2016 12: 20
              That's right, the Tu-22M3 has a refueling in the air, but wait a minute, the plane is considered strategic, if only it has an intercontinental range, without refueling. At least that was how weapons were classified during the Cold War. And I think that is reasonable. From there the classification went. Strategic (master plan of the battle), tactical (or weapon of the theater of operations) and so on. If we attribute the aircraft to the class of strategists or long-range bombers, if possible, refueling in the air, then let's draw by the ears, for example, and roughly speaking, the SU-35. Its combat radius is around 1500 km. And if you refuel? After all, he can throw a nuclear one? Strategist!!!

              Here, rather, the raisin is that, being placed on the BC, it turns into an instrument of real influence, having the ability to deliver a nuclear strike on the states located there, at a low altitude with a rounding of the relief, and in the shortest possible time. Putin gave another headache to our "partners". It delivers))
        2. -1
          16 August 2016 12: 03
          What are you clever, everyone knows this very well. Far, near, it is still strategic. Since the far, the near reflects their LTH, which were specially cut. And strategic or tactical, this reflects the tactics of application. And since the T-22M3 are capable of striking at strategic targets deep behind enemy lines, in essence this is also STRATEG, only easier. With the ability to inflict tactical attacks.
          1. +4
            16 August 2016 13: 50
            Quote: Usher
            Far, near, it’s still strategic ... in fact, it is also STRATEG, only easier. With the ability to inflict tactical attacks.

            Aha
            A tank is also an armored train. Only easier, and on the tracks.
            And An-2 is also a "strategist". Only easier, and flies closer.
            And "Tochka-U" is also the Strategic Missile Forces. Only easier, and also flies closer.
            Yes, the discoverers of new areas of operational art have appeared here.
            So to speak, strategists ... couches lol
            It’s time to disperse the entire leadership of the RF Armed Forces and VKS - a shift is on the way lol !
            Get out of control with your health. lol
            1. +4
              16 August 2016 14: 04
              Quote: oborzevatel
              Get out of control with your health.


              they ate ostap ... Ostap suffered ... but no one as a specialist calls you into question .. (I don’t accept idiots in WWA) but it’s impossible so categorically ... laughing

              What Tu 22 is called a conditional strategist - you will not deny? Yes distant, yes it flies closer, yes you are right ... but to call a tank an armored train is a bust laughing
              1. +1
                16 August 2016 18: 57
                Quote: vorobey
                What Tu 22 is called a conditional strategist - you will not deny?

                I would say - "Eurostrateg".
                Quote: vorobey
                but to call a tank an armored train is a bust

                I did my best... Yes
                1. +2
                  16 August 2016 21: 49
                  Quote: oborzevatel
                  I did my best...


                  Well, then it means ... drinks
      7. 0
        16 August 2016 10: 46
        Quote: Now we are free

        Oh, how interesting ... If anyone doesn’t understand, the Russian STRATEGIC BOMBERS will be stationed on the Iranian Air Force Base ...

        Well, no, this is not strategic aviation, the TU-22 is a long-range bomber, and the missile carrier unfortunately has no refueling in the air. And our TU-95 and TU-160 strategists, they don’t need any Hamadan.
        PS Permission to fly our "Calibers" has been received.
        1. -2
          16 August 2016 11: 35
          Quote: figvam
          Quote: Now we are free

          Oh, how interesting ... If anyone doesn’t understand, the Russian STRATEGIC BOMBERS will be stationed on the Iranian Air Force Base ...

          Well, no, this is not strategic aviation, the TU-22 is a long-range bomber, and the missile carrier unfortunately has no refueling in the air. And our TU-95 and TU-160 strategists, they don’t need any Hamadan.
          PS Permission to fly our "Calibers" has been received.

          So 22m Hamadan is not needed. It just cuts fuel and maintenance costs.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +5
      16 August 2016 09: 47
      We are waiting for widespread "concern" from American "partners."
    5. +1
      16 August 2016 10: 47
      I don’t get it? Why is this in the internet? Shoby barmalei managed to resolve?
      1. +2
        16 August 2016 11: 32
        Quote: sherman1506
        I don’t get it? Why is this in the internet? Shoby barmalei managed to resolve?


        A kind of psychic information attack ...

        Now not only the barmalei are nervous, but their patrons ...
        1. +3
          16 August 2016 11: 47
          Quote: weksha50
          A kind of psychic information attack ...


          yes no ... already in full swing http://www.interfax.ru/world/523786
      2. +1
        16 August 2016 11: 44
        Quote: sherman1506
        Shoby barmalei managed to resolve?

        Are they sho? Think in time? bully
    6. 0
      16 August 2016 12: 14
      Infa yesterday, already bombed.
    7. 0
      16 August 2016 16: 38
      Quote: Blackberry
      diapers Babahs have to change more often! laughing wassat

      That's right, from the broads in the diapers, compost is better! lol
    8. 0
      16 August 2016 17: 29
      Quote: Blackberry
      Barmoley will be toughened hard! Syria will be closer from Hamadan, the bomb load will increase, diapers will have to be changed more often by the women!

      They do not use diapers.
      They run around with sand in their pants, though it’s not as fast as before, and not so long.
  2. +2
    16 August 2016 09: 25
    It’s time to mix them with the earth ...
  3. +5
    16 August 2016 09: 26
    Great news, they are pulling Igilians from all sides, using bases in Iran, Russia has clearly stated - here we are (in BV) the main player.
    1. 0
      16 August 2016 16: 44
      Quote: Alexey-74
      Great news, they are pulling Igilians from all sides, using bases in Iran, Russia has clearly stated - here we are (in BV) the main player.

      Yes, here it’s not only, or rather not so much igil, as Turkey is put to the nail. The presence of TWO Russian bases in the region, and aiming for the third in Iraq will certainly make hysterically scratching turnips to Mr. Erdogan and closely monitor the movement of the hand of his northern neighbor.
  4. 0
    16 August 2016 09: 26
    And a ton will increase fellow
  5. +10
    16 August 2016 09: 29
    Purely not where they clean, but where they do not litter.
    Therefore, the janitor threw a broom and bought a gun.
  6. 0
    16 August 2016 09: 30
    Now you can take more bombs.
  7. +5
    16 August 2016 09: 31
    Russia requested permission from Iran and Iraq to fly cruise missiles. Russian Tu-22М3 appeared at the Iranian base Hamadan
    Yes, someone. feel laughingAnd not the fact that only igil bully
    1. +4
      16 August 2016 09: 44
      Quote: Observer2014
      And not the fact that only igil


      it's high time to "fake" someone to tear off ... drinks
      1. +3
        16 August 2016 09: 47
        vorobey hi Alexander and good morning to you drinks laughing
      2. 0
        16 August 2016 11: 46
        hi drinks
        Keep drinks
  8. +8
    16 August 2016 09: 32
    Comrades, and Iran openly began to cooperate with our VKS! Think, what a plus in the foreign policy of the Russian Federation!
    1. avt
      +3
      16 August 2016 09: 49
      Quote: V.ic
      Comrades, and Iran openly began to cooperate with our VKS!

      Yes-ah-ah-ah. This is Strong! With the current realities of the regime in Iran and our contacts with Israel, this is really a sluggish piston, not sour, but with turpentine bullyEven if on a temporary basis, but it will really precede the weight.
      1. +5
        16 August 2016 10: 05
        Tu 22 in Iran is just class! And for us and for Iran! Think about what is happening. I would have brought our air defense there. And Iran will be calmer. Yes, Volfovich is right when he said a month ago that the strongest southern union is coming. Russia-Iran -Syria-Turkey. And relations with them are not like with former neighbors from Central Asia. Russia give money for friendship.
        1. +1
          16 August 2016 10: 30
          And there, just in time, there are our c300s sold not so long ago) ...
          1. +3
            16 August 2016 11: 26
            Stabilization hi
            And there, just in time, there are our c300s sold not so long ago) ...
            Will also be with the 400 Persian Gulf at gunpoint to keep goodThe redrawing of the geopolitical map of the Middle East is in progress.
    2. 0
      16 August 2016 11: 42
      Quote: V.ic
      Comrades, and Iran openly began to cooperate with our VKS! Think, what a plus in the foreign policy of the Russian Federation!



      Recently, we also concluded trade and economic agreements concerning gas and oil as well ...
      Triple Pact - Azerbaijan-Iran_Russia ...
      Iran, in fact, is one of our competitors, in terms of oil reserves it is in 4th place in the world ...
      Now no one will put a stick in the wheels of anyone ...
      Well, when in the world many issues are resolved without warlike tricks ...
    3. +2
      16 August 2016 12: 13
      Comrades, and Iran openly began to cooperate with our VKS! Think, what a plus in the foreign policy of the Russian Federation!
      Because Vladimir Vladimirovich - not Dmitry Anatolyevich - does not twist the boot before everyone (hi deal on the S-300, etc.). Iran sees who says and does one thing: he said - allies, then allies. And the word holds tight.
      The East, with all its two-facedness and even threefoldness, perfectly understands who can afford to play like that in a straightforward manner and without wagging.
  9. +1
    16 August 2016 09: 32
    Yes, the permission to fly missiles is one thing, and the basing of aviation is already another. After all, they need to be serviced, refueled, armed, again, flight support, weather reconnaissance, target designation, etc., in short, if this is true,
    then there is already a whole air grouping outlined, I wonder what our Israeli "friends" will say about this wink
    1. +2
      16 August 2016 10: 09
      Quote: Alget87
      I wonder what our Israeli "friends" will say about this

      The easiest way is the words of Alexander Sergeyevich:
      "I am writing to you - what more?
      What else can I say?
      Now, I know, in your will
      I despise punishment.
      But you, to my miserable share
      Although a drop of pity storing,
      You will not leave me. "
      1. 0
        16 August 2016 16: 00
        Victor, it would be possible to put a separate plus for "Onegin" !!!
    2. 0
      16 August 2016 12: 14
      And how much logistics to supply based. How many cargo ...
      And yet, yes, it is interesting to change the attitude of our promised partners.
    3. 0
      16 August 2016 19: 34
      Quote: Alget87
      I wonder what our Israeli "friends" will say about this wink

      Let them smoke, our affairs are ours! Let their US partner worry for Israeli friends. Jews are not rams, they know how to keep their nose in the wind.
      And the base in Iran is our root in the BV. And as you wanted, at one time you gave the initiative to the Americans and went a mess in the Middle East, isn’t it?
  10. +2
    16 August 2016 09: 33
    The deployment of bombers and fighters in Iranian territory will give the Russian Air Force a number of advantages. “Military agreement with Tehran will reduce flight time by 60 percent”

    To be honest, it was necessary to do this for a long time. At least, as we found out the joint attitude to the Syrian problem, the situation with the S-300 complexes "settled down" (the statement of claim was removed), relations improved, then they would immediately agree on the base of the Aerospace Forces in Iran. The problems with the protection of the base are much less than in Syria.
    1. +1
      16 August 2016 12: 16
      And the supply of the S-300 is not an example more convenient. Including in the form of an integrated air defense base. And there it is already possible to train local calculations in parallel. Type for participation in the military olympiad (air defense section). Within the framework of some qualifiers, you can blast the entire Iranian air defense in training. For their own good
      wassat
  11. +5
    16 August 2016 09: 34
    It is also necessary to request from Canada. Purely neighing.
    1. 0
      16 August 2016 09: 51
      Better in Cuba.
      There is no longer for neighing: Venezuela, Cuba.
    2. 0
      16 August 2016 12: 18
      And Mexico. And any Haiti or Barbados ... there is little chtol they have candidates for this?
      feel
  12. +5
    16 August 2016 09: 35
    Very good news!
    With CFL ships, everything is clear - there is a ZTU (test tactical exercise) of the flotilla for 2016 with missile firing at real targets!
    Probably the same thing with flyers.
    And it’s a surprise about the Iranian base of Hamadam, especially for the Americans, it turns out! I can imagine what noise and din mixed with stink will rise in the west!
    Well ... good luck to our soldiers in combat training!
    1. +2
      16 August 2016 10: 32
      Quote: kepmor
      Very good news!
      With CFL ships, everything is clear - there is a ZTU (test tactical exercise) of the flotilla for 2016 with missile firing at real targets!
      Probably the same thing with flyers.
      And it’s a surprise about the Iranian base of Hamadam, especially for the Americans, it turns out! I can imagine what noise and din mixed with stink will rise in the west!
      Well ... good luck to our soldiers in combat training!

      And do not wait for the end of the Olympics!
      And then some have taken the habit of throwing surprises to us regularly.
      It seems to me that this is one of the answers to the Crimean saboteurs.
      And purely at the address, and without tension relations with ordinary Ukrainians.
    2. 0
      16 August 2016 12: 19
      mixed with stink will rise in the west!
      If only the wind rose was not in our direction. And so, let them stink.
  13. +1
    16 August 2016 09: 40
    Ask the Iranians for permission to fly over the Indian Ocean.
    Search and practice in training launches.
    If they still stayed there of course ...
  14. +2
    16 August 2016 09: 47
    Here is the news as news! I always knew that we would find a common language with the Persians.
  15. 0
    16 August 2016 09: 52
    Quote: Redfox3k
    Here is the news as news! I always knew that we would find a common language with the Persians.

    But why should the "language" be used before the weapon ...? Why announce the preparation for the operation in the media ...?
    1. 0
      16 August 2016 10: 25
      And in order to stock up on diapers in advance. Including spoil the pleasure of eating our "sworn partners". After all, neither the time nor the place of the strike is known anyway. Or does someone think that the barmaley will immediately clog in the cracks and will tremble with fear of waiting for a raid?
      1. 0
        16 August 2016 12: 52
        Judging by the number of "suicide bombers" ... they will not stock up on "diapers" .... In reality, "diapers" will not help them ... and they certainly understand this .... Oh, yes ..., " I go to you "... beautiful of course ... straight on" knightly ". And ... is it necessary, in this moment ..., all the more we understand ... where did this "igil" come from and where does it "feed" from?
        1. 0
          16 August 2016 19: 50
          Quote: sub307
          Where did this "igil" come from and where does it "feed" from?

          Ig (forbidden grouping in Russia) Well, think for yourself what kind of demon is stirring up water, the most democratic country, damn it the first time. Ama, Saudis, all kinds of scum that supposedly follow the teachings of the Prophet. Well, and denyushka with his left hand - Uncle Sam, well, not a lot of weapons.
          If you remember the artists KUKRINIKSA, they clearly in their cartoons, posters showed the essence of venality and hypocrisy, duplicity of the Yankees.
  16. 0
    16 August 2016 09: 54
    Serious preparation for serious work, the results will be effective, and launches will show what is needed, few of these bandits will not seem.
  17. 0
    16 August 2016 09: 56
    The Russian Ministry of Defense sent a request to Iran and Iraq to use the airspace of these countries for the passage of cruise missiles

    And yet I’ve already received it, so go deep into the barmalei.
  18. +1
    16 August 2016 09: 57
    We must think that the Iranian air base is protected by S-300 complexes.
  19. 0
    16 August 2016 09: 57
    The main thing is that the barmalei do not fall out of the intended places of blows ....
  20. -1
    16 August 2016 09: 58
    Tu-22m3 is excellent. But a couple hundred Po-2s with lighters would be better. And fly every night from Mexico to the White House. A rare American locator will detect such a Russian "stealth" ... This is revenge for Donbass and Odessa!
  21. +5
    16 August 2016 10: 01
    Hmm! All curious and curious. Our long-range aviation is already beginning to be based on Iran! Ships are regularly firing "Calibers" at real targets. Moreover, from two water areas at once. The Turks PROMISE to close the border to the barmaley (here it is necessary to look ...). Well, Russia, torn to shreds, comes out on top in the world in the sale of GRAIN! I generally keep quiet about weapons.
  22. 0
    16 August 2016 10: 03
    Here you probably need to keep in mind that in addition to the increased stock of ammunition, there is another positive factor. Namely, time. Indeed, in a straight line to Syria from the air base will be 500-600 kilometers. That is, after the discovery of a significant target, it can take less time to destroy it, up to an hour inclusively.
    1. 0
      16 August 2016 20: 59
      Quote: aud13
      That is, after the discovery of a significant target, it can take less time to destroy it, up to an hour inclusively.


      It's not enough "will be" ... because you need not just fly, but also destroy. and this requires a set of measures to prepare for departure wink
  23. +1
    16 August 2016 10: 11
    A small fly in the ointment, not from evil, honestly! hi As for the economy, I somehow doubt it, because the very fuel and ammunition must somehow be delivered to the base itself located in the depths of the continent. Plus the supply of aircraft, personnel, special forces. Put it all together, I don’t think flights will be cheaper. Well, and so the base is of course a huge plus, in the very center of the Middle East agglomeration a large airfield, allowing you to deploy anywhere in the Middle East. In fact, Russia's influence in the region is growing sharply ...
    1. 0
      16 August 2016 11: 48
      Quote: AlexTires
      As for the economy, I somehow doubt it, because the very fuel and ammunition must somehow be delivered to the base itself located in the depths of the continent. Plus the supply of aircraft, personnel, special forces. Put it all together, I don’t think flights will be cheaper



      In the supply chain, controlled straits fall out, and this costs a lot ...
    2. Hey
      +3
      16 August 2016 13: 48
      I fundamentally disagree with you. We can’t carry the fuel, Iran will supply it. (No one canceled the quality control. And in Gyumri, Iran has been providing fuel and lubricants on an ongoing basis for a long time). Transportation costs for its delivery are minimal. Ammunition - across the Caspian Sea on any vessel, including civilian vessels. Not any searches, nor any insurance or other international crap. You can immediately train ferry. In Iran, railway transportation.
      I see some pluses. You can use Kazakhstan ports. There is a railway line through Tajikistan. Let the CSTO move. If my memory serves me right, then the width of the railway track in Iran is the same as ours, which has its advantages.
    3. +1
      16 August 2016 16: 19
      Quote: AlexTires
      A small fly in the ointment, not from evil, honestly!


      You didn’t get a spoon .. well, no matter how.
      1. The sea is the Caspian please transport ships as much as you want and what you want.
      2. The distance to the target is almost 2 times less (less fuel more than BC) i.e. EFFICIENCY and EFFICIENCY sharply increase).
      3.Airbase in its parameters .. HIGHEST CLASS (Khmeimim, with all due respect and ... "did not stand nearby) soldier
  24. +4
    16 August 2016 10: 12
    Quote: V.ic
    Comrades, and Iran openly began to cooperate with our VKS! Think, what a plus in the foreign policy of the Russian Federation!

    Yes ... that's what the life-giving delivery of the S-300 does.
  25. 0
    16 August 2016 10: 18
    I think that since our bombers are based in Iran, then their protection should also be ours.
    1. 0
      16 August 2016 10: 33
      Of course ours. And there, in addition to combat aviation, transport workers will fly with "gifts" that need to be stored somewhere and the EU .... but to guard.
    2. 0
      16 August 2016 10: 33
      Of course ours. And there, in addition to combat aviation, transport workers will fly with "gifts" that need to be stored somewhere and the EU .... but to guard.
  26. +1
    16 August 2016 10: 21
    have already given the green light to bury, dig in live barmalei
    1. 0
      16 August 2016 10: 35
      Beauties will be - everyone will die. But not everyone will die in delight. (c) Alexander Rogers
  27. 0
    16 August 2016 10: 40
    As for the use of the base in Iran, this is our powerfully agreed, no words. This is a breakthrough, just for this you can give a laurel medal.
  28. 0
    16 August 2016 10: 51
    The height of the strip in Hamadan is 1750 m above sea level. How will such conditions affect the weight of the combat load?
  29. -4
    16 August 2016 10: 55
    This is all good, but I am worried that the West will not calm down and "accidentally" will fire one or two nuclear missiles at Syria. Used in 1945 and can now. Then everything flares up, which is what they want. And you can pull from any of their pocket countries. As a last resort, give the barmaley a warhead. What do you think about this scenario?
  30. +1
    16 August 2016 11: 02
    This is all good news! Fear the barmalei.
  31. -1
    16 August 2016 11: 21
    And why are there long-range aviation planes, if Syria is practically nearby.
  32. 0
    16 August 2016 11: 22
    It's good!!!
  33. +1
    16 August 2016 11: 38
    Yesterday it became known that Russian Tu-22М3 Russian bombers appeared in Iran at the base of Hamadan. From there, the aircraft will fly into the air to attack the objects of terrorists in Syria.


    Two times closer to the target. The bomb load will increase.
    1. 0
      16 August 2016 11: 40
      It seems this airdrome. I did not find others.
      1. 0
        16 August 2016 16: 21
        Quote: Alex_Tug
        It seems this airdrome. I did not find others.


        Watch and ... enjoy drinks

        https://www.google.ru/maps/@35.2002312,48.6603226,6266m/data=!3m1!1e3
      2. 0
        16 August 2016 16: 53
        Quote: Alex_Tug
        It seems this airdrome. I did not find others.

        Not this one.
        Вот https://www.google.ru/maps/@35.2002312,48.6603226,6266m/data=!3m1!1e3
  34. +5
    16 August 2016 11: 40
    Well, the process started: 500 km to the Canal from Khmeimim, 500 km to the Gulf from Hamadan.
    It is not just within the range of bomber aircraft, it is within the radius of action of bomber aircraft UNDER THE COVER OF AIR DEFENSE. If the process reaches its logical end and permanent VKS bases are created, then the USSR’s dream and the horror of the USA will come true: Russia will gain control over the logistics of Middle Eastern oil.
  35. +1
    16 August 2016 11: 41
    Quote: Hunter
    Last time, everything was quietly done (received permission) for the result, and now there is a double plus, the result and a psychic attack on the "partners", let them wait and guess!

    Do you seriously believe that the last time you got permission for the result? That is, first they shot, and then got permission? Well, you're naive. Cross the territories of two states that have been "at daggers" for thirty years and without notification BEFORE flying? And nothing that the same Iraq could consider it an Iranian attack?

    Quote: Orionvit
    "Backfires
    But what, do the planes no longer have a Russian name?

    If we are talking about a "name" such as, for example, "White Swan", and not about an "index" - "TU-XX", then alas, no. It is not customary for us to give each type of aircraft its own name. And to be honest, in this case, the use of the name "Backfire" simply indicates a specific type of aircraft. If Western names are not abused (to the place or out of place), then there is nothing wrong with using their names. Sometimes our TU-95s themselves are called "Bears", but then he is indignant if other names are used

    Quote: V.ic
    Comrades, and Iran openly began to cooperate with our VKS! Think, what a plus in the foreign policy of the Russian Federation!

    What can he do? He has what is called "choice without choice." Like a flight attendant on a plane: "Tea, Coffee" ??
    The Persians are well aware that Russia saved them from the possibility, if not direct "democratization," then from many problems associated with their "nuclear dossier." In addition, they now have a more adequate president, who is aware that fundamental Islam may be good, but to be surrounded only by enemies - neither will fundamental Islam help. Iran is pursuing its regional policy, in its own favor, and if it is now useful for it to have Russia as its allies, it will be "friends" with us ... But only as long as it does not go against its aspirations ...

    Quote: sergo1914
    It is also necessary to request from Canada. Purely neighing.

    Well, if you just purely laugh at VO- you can ask Canada. If there is a desire and at the same time put our Foreign Ministry and Lavrov personally round d.u.r.a.p.a.m.i, then you can also request from Canada

    Quote: prior
    We must think that the Iranian air base is protected by S-300 complexes.

    One must think that not yet. The beginning of delivery does not mean at all that this compound is already combat-ready
  36. 0
    16 August 2016 11: 42
    It is very commendable that we find a common language for a good cause for general security.
  37. 0
    16 August 2016 11: 45
    These airplanes, yes to charge with vacuum / supplies, and to pour in a crowd of donkeys husbands (ISIS) just another. Here they are sitting in a school there, they drove there, destroyed the reptiles, and the building was demolished, double use. And how would these cattle then feared the noise of planes! I don’t think that they will recover after shelling the building. It’s easier to build a new one.
  38. iov
    0
    16 August 2016 11: 59
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    Quote: Now we are free
    Even under the USSR, we ONLY DREAM could at least temporarily deploy our STRATEGs on the Iranian Air Force base ..
    Well then, communist ideology entered into an insoluble conflict with fundamental Islam. And now we have no distinct ideology, and the Iranians are not so turned on Islamism. In addition, we were then allies of the enemy of the Persians - Iraq, and now where is that strong Saddam Iraq? Destroyed, including with the tacit consent of Russia. As, however, and the Libyan Jamahiriya.
    I add that one should not so delightfully evaluate the current successes of Russia in the Middle East. Remember what the influence of the USSR in this region was earlier and moderate a bit of enthusiasm. In the old days, the Americans did not have any thoughts to use direct military force there.
    I don’t quite agree with you, a one-forum member ... the Saddam regime was more pro-American, and the Libyan leader was clearly not very pro-Russian either .... And as for the times of the USSR ... Most likely there simply weren’t any extra resources .. .. They lacked Africa and Latin America .... + Mujahideen against the advice of who trained, and ??????
  39. 0
    16 August 2016 11: 59
    The courage and courage of our aviators amazes me!
    I am proud of our videoconferencing!
  40. 0
    16 August 2016 12: 23
    How formidable, so beautiful. In general, the alliance of Russia, Iran, India, Pakistan, and China is worth a lot. This is the solution to all problems.
  41. 0
    16 August 2016 12: 25
    Quote: Xoyuschka
    This is all good, but I am worried that the West will not calm down and "accidentally" will fire one or two nuclear missiles at Syria. Used in 1945 and can now. Then everything flares up, which is what they want. And you can pull from any of their pocket countries. As a last resort, give the barmaley a warhead. What do you think about this scenario?

    How people think about this scenario say the cons that you were given for this post. They wrote nonsense, so they gave you cons. Of course, according to Zadornov, Americans can be considered "stupid", but they are not clinical idioms.
  42. -1
    16 August 2016 12: 54
    Formally, the Tu-22M3 is not a strategist.
    Although in reality, the Americans are now taking everything that is afloat away from there.
  43. 0
    16 August 2016 13: 00
    Quote: Xoyuschka
    This is all good, but I am worried that the West will not calm down and "accidentally" will fire one or two nuclear missiles at Syria. Used in 1945 and can now. Then everything flares up, which is what they want. And you can pull from any of their pocket countries. As a last resort, give the barmaley a warhead. What do you think about this scenario?

    it seems to me that this scenario is unlikely. There must be a good reason to "shoot" nuclear weapons, but there isn't. Moreover, not a single "pocket country" has nuclear weapons. And they will not give it to the barmaley.
  44. 0
    16 August 2016 13: 10
    ............................






  45. 0
    16 August 2016 13: 36
    Norm Now we will answer the bearded for our flyers in full.
    Now let's get ready, settle down and how ...
    The main thing is to have time to do all this before the election of the US President.
  46. +1
    16 August 2016 14: 08
    Squeals of European and Western dogs will soon fall! And the opposition of the liberals will start to tease!
  47. 0
    16 August 2016 16: 12
    We are expanding slowly, soon we will open a "branch" in Egypt too)
  48. +1
    16 August 2016 16: 16
    Quote: alex_V15
    Formally, the Tu-22M3 is not a strategist. Although in reality, the Americans are now taking everything that is afloat away from there.

    I think you wishful thinking. They don’t take away anything.
  49. +1
    16 August 2016 19: 39
    Anyway, very cool. soldier
  50. 0
    16 August 2016 20: 06
    But what about civil aviation flights in these countries? if I understand correctly for it will be necessary to close the air at least on the day of the attack? and by the way, on such days, apparently everyone will squeeze into very deep holes; will this strike be effective? infrastructure will be broken and manpower may not feel heavy losses.
    1. 0
      16 August 2016 21: 00
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      But what about civil aviation flights in these countries?


      As in the whole civilized world .. "regimes" and restrictions on heights and specific areas are introduced for a certain period of time wink
  51. +1
    16 August 2016 23: 41
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    Quote: The Bloodthirster
    , if not Khrushchev’s idiotic steps, with Iran would be a completely different policy than the one that took place
    And what prevented the establishment of relations with Iran in the post-Khrushchev times? I think it’s just the Islamic revolution. It was not just that Ayatollah Khomeini called the USSR "the little Satan", however, in contrast to the USA, which he called "the great Satan."

    Yes, his unlucky Trotskyist brain prevented him not only from establishing relations with Iran, but also from maintaining at least normal relations with China.
  52. 0
    17 August 2016 14: 46
    Eat it! They are standing, the landing gear is visible, but it still feels like they are flying! It’s not good for such birds to live on concrete!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"