Japan plans to deploy rocket launchers to protect remote island territories

82
The Japanese authorities plan to deploy mobile missile launchers on the islands of the Sakishima archipelago (Okinawa Prefecture) to protect remote areas in the East China Sea, reports RIA News message of the newspaper "Yomiuri".



"The expected range of the new surface-to-surface missiles will be about 300 kilometers, which is sufficient to protect remote areas, including the disputed Senkaku Islands," the newspaper writes.

It is expected that “the costs of this project will be budgeted for fiscal 2017 (starting April 1, 2017), and the deployment of mobile missile launchers will be fully completed by 2023,” the publication adds.

The newspaper reminds that "the program to improve the level of protection of the outer islands" was included in the national security program of the country in 2013. And this year the law on financial support of the project came into force.

The territorial dispute over the Senkaku Islands between Japan and the PRC has been going on since the early 1970s. The controversy escalated in 2012 when Tokyo announced the nationalization of the islands.
  • AP Photo / Emily Wang
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

82 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    August 14 2016
    China must have tensed. smile
    1. +5
      August 14 2016
      The Chinese have something to answer. And the Americans will not help even though they rule Okinawa after the fact.
    2. +6
      August 14 2016
      Quote: Vladimirets
      China must have tensed. smile

      China, in response, will turn Japan itself 180 degrees
      1. -4
        August 14 2016
        Quote: oleg-gr
        The Chinese have something to answer.

        Quote: izya top
        China, in response, will turn Japan itself 180 degrees

        What emoji means "irony"? I will sculpt everywhere in such cases. Yes
    3. +1
      August 14 2016
      Optimists want to deploy installations in 7 years. And if tomorrow is a war?
      1. 0
        August 15 2016
        Do you know the parable of how Khoja Nasreddin promised to teach his donkey to read in 25 years? When they asked him what he would do if the donkey didn’t learn to read, he said: in 25 years either the shah will die, or the donkey, or I ...
        So it is here: the Japanese have indicated their intentions, they are waiting for a response from China, Korea (northern and southern), and Russia. No one knows what will happen there in 7 years.
    4. +4
      August 14 2016
      Quote: Vladimirets
      China must have tensed. smile

      Well, if truth be told, the struggle between China and Japan for Okinawa has been going on since the 1970th century. Each state considers the archipelago to be its own. << The territorial dispute over the Senkaku Islands between Japan and China has been going on since the early 2012s. The dispute escalated in 1879, when Tokyo announced the nationalization of the islands. >> Prior to this, the Ryukyu archipelago was considered a joint possession. From the moment of its formation until 157862, the Ryukyu state was a vassal of either China or the Japanese shoguns. http://unienc.ru/w/ru/XNUMX-ryukyu-gosudarstvo.html
  2. +6
    August 14 2016
    Oh, they salmon tuna this time from the Chinese and the United States will not help if they bang a rocket at the PRC ship
    1. -3
      August 14 2016
      They have not salmoned anyone or anything, they are warriors, which cannot be said about the Chinese-colossus with feet of clay. Japanese are worthy of respect, ask the veterans who fought with them. When they entered China, theft flourished there-they were cut off. hands.If we had this, all the officials went armless.
      1. +7
        August 14 2016
        asked veterans, they say that they are fanatics and not warriors
        1. -3
          August 14 2016
          Well, well, in my opinion, the only country that has grown up exceptional on their territory.
          1. +5
            August 14 2016
            baracki wildebeest ... exclusively surrendered to the exclusive so that from the USSR it is not at all to be shocked on its

            Hawaii and Alaska were not then states, nor were the Philippines
            1. -1
              August 15 2016
              As it is all chaotic, the head does not rob, the fingers do their job, and even the followers are.
              1. 0
                August 15 2016
                maybe one lad does not catch up or pretends
      2. +6
        August 14 2016
        fanatics and butchers are not warriors fool
        1. -2
          August 15 2016
          Think that you are writing, humiliating the enemy's army, you, first of all, humiliate your own.
          1. 0
            August 15 2016
            what collapsed in Manchuria in two weeks and was thrown out of Korea, from Sakhalin and the Kuriles in one more, is difficult to humiliate,
            and you cannot humiliate ours.
    2. 0
      August 14 2016
      This is when the Chinese have at least once salted. They have lost all the wars of recent times, and numerical superiority has never helped. And Japan did whatever it wanted in China without any problems at all. So don't fill it in here. Japan is a serious adversary.
      1. +5
        August 14 2016
        Imagine - Americans 1950-1951 in Korea lol along with all their "UN" (except for the USSR) to boot laughing
        That is, in fact, on the contrary, it turns out that almost everything laughing
        1. 0
          August 15 2016
          The losses of the United States and its allies are still less than those of the Chinese. The Chinese in that war, in fact, once again took in numbers, not skill.
          1. 0
            August 19 2016
            maybe less, but not much, the Chinese took skill and the victory was
            1. 0
              August 19 2016
              in addition to this war, there was also a small war with the Indians in the Himalayas, where they also took the skill
              https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Китайско-индийская_пограни
              black_war_ (1962)

              When the Americans were driven away from the Chinese border in Korea, despite the absolute superiority of the Americans at sea and shelling from battleships, and limited air superiority (so absolute over the front line, because MiGs did not fly closer than 100 km to it), the Americans and their allies also surpassed the Chinese and North Koreans in the artillery were barely holding the front, because the Chinese cleverly cut them out at night.
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +1
        August 15 2016
        The Chinese have lost wars more than once. And they captured China more than once in their 6000-year history. But here's the paradox: absolutely all the invaders became Chinese.
        1. 0
          August 15 2016
          The Japanese didn't.
          1. 0
            August 16 2016
            Quote: Greenwood
            The Japanese didn't.

            Did not have time. Ours kicked them out early.
  3. +10
    August 14 2016
    The owner ordered to escalate the situation.
  4. +3
    August 14 2016
    Hmm, every day the news is hotter request
    1. +2
      August 14 2016
      Hmm, every day the news is hotter


      I don't see anything hot yet.
  5. +2
    August 14 2016
    I wonder what kind of remote territories can Japan have? Especially for missiles ...
    1. +2
      August 14 2016
      Quote: Jovanni
      I wonder what kind of remote territories can Japan have? Especially for missiles ...

      Controversial, not only between China and Japan.
  6. +7
    August 14 2016
    During the late Soviet Union, Japan kept the most combat-ready forces in its "northern sector". Now the vector has shifted and in order to defend their interests the Japanese have to deal with the "southern sector" of their defense, where China is showing increased activity.
    P.S. Let them butt "for the disputed southern islands and the status of the straits".
    1. +1
      August 15 2016
      Quote: Thunderbolt
      During the late Soviet Union, Japan kept the most combat-ready forces in its "northern sector". Now the vector has shifted and in order to defend their interests the Japanese have to deal with the "southern sector" of their defense, where China is showing increased activity.
      P.S. Let them butt "for the disputed southern islands and the status of the straits".

      I agree! But not completely! Now Japan has two directions, for now. These are north and south, but other directions may arise. Not necessarily by military means.
  7. +1
    August 14 2016
    Bad news. The Japanese are serious fighters, not like the Chinese. And if they begin to actively "rattle their weapons", it will not end well.
    1. +4
      August 14 2016
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Bad news

      It looks like China has seriously strained everyone in the region, I think this is another region where there will be a serious war.
  8. PKK
    +2
    August 14 2016
    Yes, the Japs scared China. The Chinese will build islands as far as Japan and will not ask. The Japanese will twitch a little and find themselves in the Ocean, away from Fujiyama.
    1. +1
      August 14 2016
      Less Chinese mountains, plus new Chinese islands? what
    2. +4
      August 14 2016
      The Japanese do not think about what will happen if each Chinese throws two cobbles into the water?
      1. 0
        August 14 2016
        Why didn't it help the Chinese during the war, and they were a Japanese colony for 1937 years from 8 until the Japanese were defeated by Soviet troops and the American fleet ?!
        1. +4
          August 14 2016
          Because they had a civil war that ended on the continent only in 1949.
          1. -1
            August 15 2016
            I have not heard, but I admit, the Chinese had their own national hero, and after the war they brought Mao, who had served the entire war in the USSR.
            1. 0
              August 15 2016
              He did not sit in the USSR, he, like many other participants, had his own province
            2. The comment was deleted.
    3. -1
      August 14 2016
      Let me remind you that Japan has been doing lawlessness in China for 8 years, with absolutely impunity. The Chinese were not helped by their numbers, which even then significantly exceeded the Japanese.
      1. +5
        August 14 2016
        I remind Japan in 1905 bent over Russia too, but this does not mean that later it didn’t get rid of the most crooked ones with China.
        1. 0
          August 15 2016
          Quote: Bath
          then she didn’t shove off the most
          Ogrebla from the trained Soviet army, which went through the worst war in history.
          Quote: Bath
          try to fight the dragon now
          The Chinese got rid of people even from the Vietnamese army, weakened by the war with the United States. And consider the Chinese mentality and the Japanese mentality as well as the training. In the latter, it is traditionally stronger.
      2. 0
        August 15 2016
        The government was traitors.
      3. 0
        August 15 2016
        Lawlessness was happening to the Japanese, they put things in order, according to grandfather and grandmother. They lived there during the occupation. Minus is not mine.
  9. +2
    August 14 2016
    Thank you, of course, but we ourselves will somehow (without snotty) protect OUR remote islands! soldier
  10. +1
    August 14 2016
    300KM RANGE? Somewhere they decided to clean up, hike ... with rackets.
  11. +2
    August 14 2016
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    Bad news. The Japanese are serious fighters, not like the Chinese. And if they begin to actively "rattle their weapons", it will not end well.

    Correctly recalled above, the Japanese put half of Asia under themselves until they faced the Soviet army, and the vaunted millionth Kwantung army surrendered in a month. There were Japanese fighters, but they swam. The Americans etched the fighting spirit of the samurai into them, just like the Germans.
    1. +1
      August 14 2016
      Let's be objective.
      Quote: Orionvit
      half of Asia the Japanese put under themselves
      All of Southeast Asia was invaded by Japan. Even a landing was planned for Australia. Not a single Asian country was able to oppose anything to the Japanese military.
      Quote: Orionvit
      until they collided with the Soviet army, and the vaunted millionth Kwantung army surrendered in a month
      Before that, the Soviet army had been learning to fight for 4 years and learned to be excellent, breaking the back of the German Wehrmacht, the fighting efficiency and training of which had no equal in Europe. Naturally, the Soviet army in 1945 was the strongest in the world, and no other force could have coped with it.
      Quote: Orionvit
      There were Japanese fighters, but they swam.
      Really ?! The Americans fought with them for 4 years, and won by numbers rather than skill. More ships, more resources.
      Quote: Orionvit
      The Americans etched the fighting spirit of the samurai into them, just like the Germans.
      This is all nonsense. There is no need to look at the outer window of the country. The Japanese army is one of the strongest and most efficient in the world. A developed industry allows the production of all types of weapons. In fact, the Japanese are hindered only by the restrictions imposed on them at the end of the war.
      1. +2
        August 14 2016
        The industry will produce if there are raw materials ... and the mobilization reserve is not so hot ...
        1. 0
          August 14 2016
          The raw materials will be. Today Japan is friends with many Asian countries to which China has territorial claims. They will customize if something happens.
          1. 0
            August 15 2016
            Quote: Greenwood
            The raw materials will be. Today Japan is friends with many Asian countries to which China has territorial claims. They will customize if something happens.

            A very sober and detailed commentary, Whoever minus does not know the entire history of the Japan-Korea-China triangle in the history of mankind. For some reason, they operate with the latest events, but there were the Japanese-Chinese and Japanese-Korean wars in the XNUMXth century and earlier. And disputes over these territories have been going on since antiquity.
            On the supply of raw materials. A part of Japan's industry is located even in the United States, I'm not talking about Southeast Asia, and the position of Japanese capital is very strong in this region. The positions of the Japanese in Australia are also very strong. So do not think and dwell on the fact that Japan is only the Japanese islands. Now there are two Eastern Tigers in the battle: Japan and China, claiming hegemony while in Asia, but what will happen next ,time will show. Japan has enlisted the support of the United States, the PRC seeks not to lose good relations with Russia. This is the alignment of forces in Asia. In addition, one should not forget about the deceit of both. I mean Japan and China.
  12. +4
    August 14 2016
    Japan is not the Upper Volta. with the capital Ouagadagu. highly developed technological self-sufficient country is the only negative. country of one massive nuclear strike and it will not. plus - zero natural resources. in any case, one should be wary of it.
  13. -2
    August 14 2016
    I have already written several times, picked up the minuses from amateurs, but I will remind you again:
    not the ARMY of China will fight for the islands, but only the Fleet and Aviation no... Now the Americans are gathering a coalition to simultaneously "squeeze out" all the disputed islands and partly Chinese (to transfer the latter to Taiwan's control) - to block China's access to the sea and send wounded pride by land - to the north!
    It will be a simultaneous strike in all directions: Senkaku, Spratly / Nansha, etc.
    Those. Brunei, the Philippines, Vietnam, Japan, etc. will fight, as it were, with the Americans - like creating a world "opinion" in the media. But where did a specific rocket come from into a Chinese corvette, plane and submarine - no one will know for a long time!
    It is unprofitable for China to wet the nuclear weapons of Brunei and other small items, because while the aggressor will be expelled from the Security Council and imposed sanctions, like ours (but what goods are beneficial to the United States - they will continue to bring them, they will not do anything to their own detriment), plus the Americans will "forgive" their debt - candy wrapper will strengthen even more. China has about a year left - and they can only be saved at sea by an extensive network of submarine missile-carrying gliders and sailing robotic catamarans - only with their help it is possible to multiply the reconnaissance and power of a missile strike, without taking the main fleet out of the cover of the mainland air defense. The remoteness of all the islands from China and each other would otherwise force the Chinese to scatter resources and become easy prey for the forces of the "anti-island" coalition. Recently, there was news about the alleged redeployment of Vietnamese anti-ship missiles to the disputed islands - this may be "misleading" to justify subsequent strikes from the Burkes (no, no, I made a reservation - the United States adheres to "neutrality", as with the Barmaley).
    Onshore to China none will not climb!
    The fallen Chinese economy will crush us too. And in a dozen years, the starving 3 billion will enter Siberia to feed ...
    1. +2
      August 14 2016
      The threshold of China's use of TNW is the loss of a large landing ship with a landing party, or more than 100 aircraft, so all this fuss is fraught with a limited nuclear war and the extinction of all mankind.
      The most normal, acceptable and fair option is to transfer Senkaku under the control of Taiwan, and so that the PRC can continue to produce oil there without fear.
      1. 0
        August 14 2016
        Quote: Simpsonian
        The threshold of China's use of TNW is the loss of a large landing ship with a landing party, or more than 100 aircraft, so all this fuss is fraught with a limited nuclear war and the extinction of all mankind.

        Have we bombed many countries for Kursk? For the Su-24, you personally, how much a tomato haven't eaten?
        Priorities nation and priorities the leading elite - Different things..
        Quote: Simpsonian
        The most normal, acceptable and fair option is to transfer Senkaku under the control of Taiwan, and so that the PRC can continue to produce oil there without fear.

        No, to agree with Brunei on joint use, but there, they say, the Americans are putting a spoke in the wheel - they are hindering this agreement ...
        1. +3
          August 14 2016
          Don't confuse the Russian and Chinese governments. In addition, the PRC will answer with nuclear weapons even for a simple ordinary but rather large strike by the Americans on their continental territory with conventional weapons.

          Brunei is far from Senkaku, you made a mistake with the South China and East China seas.
          1. 0
            August 14 2016
            And you made a mistake with Taiwan - the islands "belong" to Japan so far, and she certainly will not give them to Taiwan.
            And why should amers bomb CONTINENTAL China, if to "squeeze" all the islands (not only Senkaku), you can only destroy the fleet and aircraft over the seas ?!
            And the Chinese government has so far had no real achievements other than loud statements. Shooting at America through the missile defense zones in Korea, Japan and the Pacific Ocean, knowing that in response a THOUSAND more will fly in, I would have thought for a long time in the place of any government ... China does not yet have weapons against the United States, in five years it will but will they give them these FIVE years?!
            1. 0
              August 15 2016
              you made a mistake with "belong" and "hand over"

              Then why did they bomb Vietnam and North Korea?

              where is the pornography in the last paragraph from? also a CIA analyst who does not even know the approximate amount of Chinese nuclear weapons in the arsenals, which encourages bloggers to search for Chinese missile tunnels through Google? laughing
        2. 0
          August 14 2016
          Quote: Aviagr
          Have we bombed many countries for Kursk?

          And please tell me which countries specifically attacked our Kursk?
          Quote: Aviagr
          For the Su-24, how many tomatoes have you not eaten personally?

          For the Su-24, Erdogan personally came to bow, and yes - Turkey did not eat a lot of tomatoes and the resorts did not take a lot of tourists ...
          AP China is a powerful economic power, really stepping on the heels of the United States, and the largest holder of the US national debt to the heap, so they will be able to answer economically.

          Now, regarding a possible conflict - if the Americans go to open confrontation with the PRC, then it will be simply impossible to calculate the consequences, the PRC, in case of defeat, can really go for a close military alliance with us.

          But simply to escalate tension, forging a coalition against China and forcing China to spend on defense in excess of what was planned - these are the Americans are masters, but they themselves will not climb, because the "Roman Empire" has already entered the stage when it could not defeat the barbarians itself, but only tried play them against each other ...
          1. 0
            August 15 2016
            Specifically USA

            Have you seen his bows?
            1. 0
              August 15 2016
              Quote: Simpsonian
              Specifically USA

              Then I will answer you with a quote from the famous Seshash movie:
              "What is your evidence ?!" (forgive me not to betray the accent, alas), but seriously - proofs to the studio ...
              Quote: Simpsonian
              Have you seen his bows?

              And you look at the record of his meeting with the GDP, and the records of his many previous meetings - the difference in behavior on the face ...
              1. 0
                August 15 2016
                This shows your attitude to what happened, your bias and your intellectual level ... Do you live in the USA?

                An emergency buoy of a foreign submarine emerged nearby, an urgent visit of the CIA director to Moscow to negotiate the problem. Cutting off and bombing the bow compartment under water, so that no one could see the traces, the lack of her filming under water, the hiding of the logbooks (the remaining sailors did not die immediately).

                I didn’t look, but I caught a glimpse of how he behaved before, and it was immediately clear where everything was going.
                1. +1
                  August 15 2016
                  Quote: Simpsonian
                  This shows your attitude to what happened, bias and intellectual level ...

                  Be kind - please tell a stranger you, otherwise you have inadvertently demonstrated your level of upbringing)))) And I do not live in the USA, moreover, from my comments you can understand that I have extremely negative feelings towards this country)))) As for my attitude - I certainly admit that this is a terrible tragedy - so many guys, including cadets, were ruined, so all these chick-eaters had to be tried and imprisoned, and not just fired ... And believe me, that I I do not consider the death of Kursk to be the fault of the Americans - it does not mean at all that I do not feel sorry for the dead people ...

                  Now on the topic - everything has been considered for a long time and the surfacing of the buoy, and the damage to the NATO submarine on duty there - all versions from collision to direct torpedoing have long been recognized as untenable, since the nature of the damage suggests that the explosion was internal - what exploded inside there - this is a separate issue.
                  As for the nasal compartment, everything has also been considered long ago and in detail, and all the "conspiracy theories" on this issue have long been dispelled ...

                  But if you want to believe in conspiracy theories - believe, your sovereign right hi
                  1. -1
                    August 19 2016
                    I think that with the attitude shown above and the "conspiracy theories" here, you are not worth it.
                    1. -1
                      August 19 2016
                      There was damage, there was a buoy, Tennett's arrival in Moscow was, such a laborious sip of the nose does not in any way agree with the practice of lifting work, and what theories can there be about the lack of video of underwater filming of the bow?
                      1. -1
                        August 19 2016
                        Here is another minus from some creature almost immediately ...
                        And in the Navy, everyone knows what was there, but everything is under subscription, and no one else will call Moscow, asking what to do with a foreign submarine that torpedoed ours, then released an emergency buoy with a message that it had "problems with the Russians" on the ground.
    2. +1
      August 14 2016
      The fallen Chinese economy will crush us too. And in a dozen years, the starving 3 billion will enter Siberia to feed ... ,,
      did not try to write fantasy?
      1. -2
        August 14 2016
        Quote: kotvov
        did not try to write fantasy?

        At the age of 14, I predicted the return of the capitalist system (in the form of a hypothesis), for which admission to the Komsomol was postponed for a year and had conversations with "polite people." But now the headmaster says at meetings: And you were right ...
        And I'm always right. Just always.
        1. +2
          August 14 2016
          Quote: Aviagr
          And I'm always right. Just always.

          Yes you, my friend, I look not only right, but also modest in addition ... The most modest in the whole universe ...
          1. -3
            August 14 2016
            Horses die from modesty ... :-)
            Okay, let's postpone the continuation of the dispute for a year or a year and a half: let's see if you can collect 5 boxes of cognac with all your "General Staff" minus, or "be modest" .. :-)
            1. +2
              August 14 2016
              Quote: Aviagr
              Horses die from modesty ... :-)

              OOO! And I am so dark and illiterate it turns out (!) - I thought that the horses were dying from overwork and poor feeding! And that's how it turns out!
              Quote: Aviagr
              Okay, let's postpone the continuation of the dispute for a year or a year and a half: let's see if you can collect 5 boxes of cognac with all your "General Staff" minus, or "be modest" .. :-)

              If I were you, I would be more worried about what to do to you, if suddenly (but this, of course, well, very unlikely, we all understand)))) your, so to speak, forecast will not come true, after such manifestations of unstoppable modesty wink
    3. +1
      August 15 2016
      Rice porridge in your head?
  14. +2
    August 14 2016
    A fresh anecdote - a country with a broken ridge Japan is going to threaten nuclear missile China (the world's first economy) with rackets with a range of 300 km.
  15. +2
    August 14 2016
    These Senkaku Islands are located very far from China.
    But they make it possible to block the passage to the South China Sea.
    Which is very sensitive for China. So China will fight for them.
    1. -2
      August 14 2016
      Quote: Zomanus
      So China will fight for them.

      Will send along the bottom of the South China Sea zombie-the army, having previously stolen etc.оdamned Inca gold ?! How are you going to do this with the sunken fleet and aviation? The entire route from China to the islands lies in the air defense / anti-ship missile systems of Vietnam, Japan and US aircraft carriers; the same can be said about the ships: to drive "through the line" -crossfire, albeit good, but inferior to amers in the range of missiles and air defense, corvettes - only for destruction. And how can these targets save the islands? They will generally imagine: who are they fighting with, where are the missiles and torpedoes flying from? It's like going into a gateway at night, and there they'll throw stones at you from both sides in silence, and then finish off with their feet. For fun, they can talk in Russian over the radio - they will recruit volunteers from 404 like in Georgia - who will you order China to bomb: Russia, 404, Brunei, the States ...? Wipe off the snot, expose the Note and dig deeper into the ground, preparing for the campaign to the north..
  16. +2
    August 14 2016
    Quote: roman72-452
    The owner ordered to escalate the situation.

    And Russia does not need to lag behind! In its direction, to manage the air defense system and the coastal anti-ship missile complexes in the Kuril Islands and Sakhalin. Like we did not start, the answer to the Japanese! good hi
  17. +4
    August 14 2016
    One should not "shine with knowledge of history" and extol Japanese militarism. Allegedly, they are awesome warriors. Their Ministry of Education and Propaganda worked well - yes. Since childhood, they have been driving into the confusion that blah-blah-blah yamato, and blah-blah-blah mikado. They pulled the moss overgrown bushido from under the floor, and began to form a superior race. And we know how they were given a light during the Manchurian operation. Many of them were killed there on the Manchurian plain. As long as there is Kokuryukai in Japan, she is not our brother, and not our sister! And the Chinese army should not be underestimated. She is young, rearmed, high-tech, and numerous. And just think, the Chinese military history is some 3500 years old ... During this time, China has been losing all the time, as a result, in the XNUMXst century, it has become the fastest growing economy ... lol
    1. 0
      August 15 2016
      Quote: Watchdog
      And the Chinese army should not be underestimated. She is young, rearmed, high-tech, and numerous.
      The same can be said for the Japanese army. She is also young, well equipped and even more technological than the Chinese one. As for the number, the Japanese take not by number, but by skill.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"