"Bran" - "machine gun for gentlemen"

53
My acquaintance with this machine gun took place in the 10th grade of the specialized school No. 6 of the city of Penza in the classes on ... military translation. Since the school was "special", with the study of English from the second grade, it turned out that, in addition to, in fact, English, we studied the geography of continents, English, and American literature in English (we memorized poems byron, Shelley and Kipling ), and we also had technical translation and military translation. In the military - except for the English teacher, there was also a teacher of the NVP. In the classroom, we studied the military structure of the NATO and US armies and even learned to interrogate prisoners of war: “Now I interrogate you (pig)!” - and the last word was forbidden to use, like many others, as "figurative". Of course, we learned to disassemble and assemble the Kalashnikov assault rifle, but once our military instructor brought us the Bran machine gun, and we disassembled and assembled it “in English”, that is, we got acquainted with all the terms and the name of the operations that were performed sequentially. I don’t know why, but then I really liked him, first of all, of course, for his unusualness. Only one handle - one on the barrel, and the other on the butt, which was worth it! But why he is so and why so different from the PKK, the military instructor did not explain to us. Then the years passed and I met the memoirs of the tanker V.P. Chibisova "English Tanks at the Steep Log ”(Novosibirsk, 1996). In them, he described in detail the armament of the Matilda tank, including the Bes and Bran machine guns, which he even called the gentleman machine gun, which seemed to him complete, thoughtful, and comfortable. Here is the “Demon” - that “no”, “not a dandy”, weapon for work, and this one is a real gentleman.


"Bran" Mk I with a folded cocking handle.

That is, the weapon is certainly interesting and fully deserves the most detailed story about yourself.

So began story "Bran" long before, in fact, his appearance, during the First World War, where the British used easel machine guns "Vikkers" Mk I and Lewis MXXX light machine guns of the year. True, they didn’t like the BAR M1915 A1918 automatic rifle, which fired British .2 cartridges (303 x 7,7 R), and then in the 56 year, they were preoccupied with creating a committee that had to test various samples of foreign light machine guns and choose the best from them.

In the competition participated: two Browning machine guns - the American BAR M1918 A2 and the Belgian FN M1922, then the Danish "Madsen" in the British version, under the British ammunition; French “Hotchkiss”, a modification of the LMG Mle 1909 - Mle 1924, used by the British cavalry during the war years; American Lewis, (type D) 1915 modification of the year; and the “native” Bidmore - Farhar Mk I. They fired a lot and for a long time, then in the 1924-1930. held four more competitions, established the first prize for the winner in the amount of £ 3000, but none of the machine guns could not stand the test.

During the 1927 test of the year, the Czech machine gun ZB-26 by Václav Cholek (1886-1954) also hit them. The latter, being self-taught, like Browning or Degtyarev, managed, however, to create a completely competitive model, which had already been adopted for use in Czechoslovakia and was manufactured at the Brno factory. However, the Holek machine gun was designed under the German cartridge for the "Mauser" of the 7,92-mm caliber without rim, and the British needed a weapon for the cartridges with the 7,71-mm caliber rifle used in the Lee-Enfield rifle.

"Bran" - "machine gun for gentlemen"

"Bran" and next to him his Czechoslovak predecessor ZB vz.26.

October 29 1930, the next competition began. This time the French machine gun Darna was tested, which, however, was not successful due to delays, the Hungarian Kiray-Ende and the British Vickers-Berthier Mk I. The Czech machine gun was also tested and showed good results. By this time, China had acquired a license for its production, so that this weapon was already at war. Each year a sample appeared that was somehow different from the previous one, so the improvement of the basic model went "step by step", that is, "step by step".


The machine gun ZB 30 - MG 26 (t).

In June 1931, the model ZB 30 received the English name GBS 30 (United Kingdom - Sbroevka), took part in the test along with the French machine gun of Darn and the English "Vikkers-Berthier" Mk II. Fire was fired at targets from 500 to 2500 yards at the Hite range, weapons survivability after 10000 shots was determined at the Royal Small Arms Factory (RSAF) at Enfield, in Midllsex. In “Protocol No. 1188 "about the GBS 30 reported" ... the GBS machine gun is an excellent specimen made of good materials and can be recommended for use. "


Czechoslovak experienced machine gun ZGB-30 caliber .303.

However, only the model ZB vz.33 fully satisfied the British military. On a sample modernized by Anton Marek, Emanuel and Wenceslaus Cholekami, the flue pipe length was changed, the barrel was made without fins (on the Czech sample the fins went to the trunk flue pipe), and, of course, the shape of the store was changed. In Czech it was straight, but in English it turned out to be strongly curved under the British .303 ammunition with a rim. The gas regulator was also installed on four positions, which allows to achieve reliable operation even if the mechanism is soiled with carbon deposits. However, he was once again tested with the domestic VB Mk II in August 1934 of the year, and ultimately the “Czech” beat the “Englishman”, revealing the complete superiority of Czechoslovak weapons. This was followed by army tests in Her Majesty’s own Queen 4 Hussars, and the royal hussars also spoke for the machine gun of a foreigner, although, as you know, foreigners in England at that time were not very fond of.


Czechoslovak experienced machine gun ZGB-33 caliber .303.

A total of 33500 shots were made on each test trunk. The tests began in January, and in early February 1934 of the year ended. Theoretically, the machine gun was calculated on 70000 shots. The machine gun was called "Bran" - abbreviated from Brno-Enfield, but its first model, which received the Mark I, saw the light of only 3 of September 1937 of the year. Almost three years, the English engineers took the development and running production technologies. The fact is that, as it turned out, making such a good weapon is not very easy. It was necessary to perform 226 operations only for the manufacture of the receiver (!), All of which were carried out on ... milling machines! That is, initially it was necessary to take a 10-kilogram steel bar, and then skip it through several different machines and eventually remove 8 kilograms of chips from it! The part itself, which went to the assembly, weighed only 2 kg! To produce a shutter, 270 operations had to be performed, and in both cases 550 measurements had to be carried out, and tolerances reached the 0,0005 inch (0,0127 mm). By the end of 1937, 42 was manufactured by Bran, and since May of next year, the production volume reached 200 units per week.


Manual machine gun "Bran" Mk I.

4 August 1938 "Bran" Mk I was officially adopted by the British army. Production growth reached 300 units per week. First of all, the new machine gun entered the motorized units and looked at it "almost like a relic," but even there only senior non-commissioned officers had the right to treat it first. However, by the 1940, the plant produced their 30000 units, which allowed them to feed the troops and train not only non-commissioned officers, but private soldiers to work with them. True, it turned out that the store, loaded 30-th ammunition, often jammed. But if you load 28 or 29 cartridges into it, then this trouble could be avoided.

Now every British infantry unit consisting of 10 people got their own "bran". The calculation consisted of two infantrymen: №1 - machine gunner-shooter, №2 - assistant (carrier of ammunition). Each compartment relied on 25 equipped stores, and on the form of the sample 1937, specially provided pockets for carrying them. The machine gun turned out to be convenient and “soldier-proof”; in addition, it was ideally suited for conducting dagger fire in defense, and in attack it was possible to shoot both from the hip and from the shoulder. The rate of 500 fires per minute allowed it to be easily controlled, and the overheated barrel could be easily replaced with a new one, for every machine gun they were supposed to be six pieces!


Manual machine gun "Bran" L4A4 chambered for caliber 7,62x51 NATO.

By the time 3 of September 1939 of the year Britain entered the Second World War, the production of "brands" had reached the level of 400 units per week. 90% machine guns were sent to France, where they were lost. After the tragedy of Dunkirk, only 2,300 units remained in the army. But the Germans adopted them under the name "Leichte MG-138 (e)". The threat of being left without a light machine gun was so great that urgent measures were taken to increase the output. A new model of the Mk II was urgently developed, in which only the principle of operation remained from the old one. The complex drum scope was removed, the additional handle for the left hand under the butt was removed, the bipods were also simplified. Then came samples Mk III and Mk IV. The first one with a barrel shortened to 565 mm (its weight was 8,6 kg), the second with a modified butt. In Canada, produced a machine gun for the Chinese chambered for 7,92-mm and with a direct shop. At the same time, the Mk I model also continued to be produced even in the 1944 year, so that several types of machine guns were exploited in the army. During the war years, about 300000 machine guns of all these types were fired. In Taiwan, in 1952, a new version was launched - the M 41 for American cartridges. 30-06 (7,62 x 63).


During the years of the Second World War, even the natives of New Guinea were shooting from the “brands”!

The adoption of the American cartridge .1953W (308x762) in 51 as the main rifle cartridge for NATO led to the fact that the British “branes” of the .303 caliber had to be redone for this new caliber. This is how the "bran" of the Mk III, converted to this standard NATO cartridge, appeared. His barrel is chrome-plated, which increased the survivability of the weapon, the store is straight, there is no conical flame arrester It is called "L4-A4". It was used by the Royal Marine Corps in the Falklands and during the Gulf War. So it can be attributed to the "long-livers".

(To be continued)
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    12 August 2016 06: 56
    Yes, the car is solid .....
    1. +4
      12 August 2016 15: 14
      Said the lady and put in a new store
      1. +5
        12 August 2016 22: 48
        learned to interrogate prisoners of war: “Now I interrogate you (pig)!”
        Author Vyacheslav Shpakovsky

        I remembered a joke about a military translator.
        War. A military translator is conducting an interrogation of a prisoner of war.
        - Wat from you name? (What is your name?)
        - My name is John Smith. ... hryas captive in the face.
        - Wat from you name?
        - (Surprised) My name is John Smith! ... hryas captive in the face.
        - Wat from you name ?!
        - (Almost crying) My name is John Smith !!! ... hryas captive in the face.
        “I ask you, ram, for the last time, how many tanks do you have! ..”
      2. +1
        13 August 2016 08: 56
        In my opinion, this is "Lock, Stock, Two Barrels." This lady was stoned in trash. She shot one shop, did not hit anyone and again fell into a coma.
        1. 0
          13 August 2016 12: 40
          Nice filmets with black English humor.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      3 October 2016 23: 42
      Thanks a lot for the article!

  2. +6
    12 August 2016 06: 58
    And how it aims, the store interferes, or how. And what turns out, it was non-technological in production, it requires highly skilled workers. Thanks for the article, interesting.
    1. +8
      12 August 2016 07: 34
      The sight and front sight are shifted to the left.
  3. +6
    12 August 2016 07: 31
    Anti-aircraft version, from Wikipedia.
    1. +6
      12 August 2016 07: 35
      The version was called Terribble Twins - "The Terrible Twins". But still little was fired at the planes. Although they were even installed on ships.
  4. +2
    12 August 2016 07: 42
    Quote: kalibr
    The sight and front sight are shifted to the left.

    Thank you for the answer. And is it still in service with armaments or will it continue
    1. +9
      12 August 2016 07: 49
      Bren machine guns were used by the British in World War II, later in Korea, and in the late 1991th century in the Falkland Islands and during the XNUMX Gulf War. The Brens have been in the hands of both the British Commonwealth of Nations and the Irish Defense Forces and the ubiquitous Chiang Kai-shek Chinese.

      The L4A4 and L4A5 models are still in service with the British Army and Navy, as well as in those countries where the British delivered their weapons.
    2. +2
      12 August 2016 11: 16
      There will be a continuation and not one!
  5. +4
    12 August 2016 07: 47
    Indeed, "long-liver" .... Thank you ..
  6. +1
    12 August 2016 10: 12
    What's the point of a machine gun with 30 rounds? This results in a complicated, weighted assault rifle (automatic). Well, there would be tape power or a disk store ...
    1. +1
      12 August 2016 11: 18
      The French had a "handbrake" for 25 rounds, the Americans for 20 ... the Chinese for 20 and nothing - they fought!
      1. +2
        12 August 2016 13: 46
        The French had a "handbrake" for 25 rounds, the Americans for 20 ... the Chinese for 20 and nothing - they fought!

        I will add, with your permission.
        The Soviet Union had quite a working DP with which the allies before the 60-s also ran.
        So for "degtyarev" there were disc-type magazines in the kit, and:
        The capacity of the store was originally 49 cartridges, later 47-cartridges were introduced with increased reliability of action. Three magazines with a metal box for carrying them were attached to the machine gun.

        The calculation of the DP consisted of two people - a machine gunner (gunner) and his assistant (sometimes called the second number). The assistant carried the stores in an iron box on three discs or in a canvas bag. The calculation of the machine gun with 1-2 fighters allocated for a tray of ammunition, could carry "on themselves" 9 stores.

        A total of 470 pieces if with a "pancake" on the machine gun itself.
        And the "Bren":
        Each compartment relied on 25 equipped stores, and on the form of the sample 1937, specially provided pockets for carrying them.

        And more
        For me personally, it is still not clear why a box-shaped magazine was not used for the DP like the one used in the English Bren light machine gun, also created for the rim of cartridges, although Degtyarev developed a similar power scheme for the experimental RP 1938 of the year - M. Popenker

        Thank you for the article.
        hi
        Got a huge pleasure.
        Respectfully..
        1. +2
          12 August 2016 14: 05
          Thanks for the tip, but ... 25 times 300 will be more than Degtyarev's. By the way, Bolotin has a photo of such a version with a box magazine, but it “didn't work.” Why? Who knows? By the way, there will be more and more. Wait.
          1. +1
            12 August 2016 21: 44
            Thanks for the tip, but ... 25 multiplied by 300 it will be more than that of Degtyarev.

            I just meant it ... just multiply by 30. feel
            Moreover, the specific weight of the magazine for one cartridge (kg / pc) is also not in favor of the PD.
            It was the addition of your answer to the distinguished The Kotu.

            Unfortunately, he did not hold "Brena" in his hands. Unlike DP.

            Bolotin has a photo of such a version with a box magazine, but it “didn't go.” Why?

            The modification went with a tape and a heavy barrel, but that's another story ...
            You promised to continue ..
            Thanks again. I am waiting.
            1. -1
              13 August 2016 11: 22
              Quote: Lekov L
              That’s exactly what I had in mind ... only multiply by 30. feel
              Moreover, the specific weight of the magazine for one cartridge (kg / pc) is also not in favor of the PD.
              It was the addition of your answer to the distinguished The Kotu.



              Thank you all for the comments.

              I had more in mind not the total number of rounds, but the ability to conduct continuous fire. All the same, the machine gun is designed specifically for such an application. And constantly change the store ... Especially located on top ...
              1. 0
                15 August 2016 09: 14
                Quote: The Cat

                Thank you all for the comments.

                I had more in mind not the total number of rounds, but the ability to conduct continuous fire. All the same, the machine gun is designed specifically for such an application. And constantly change the store ... Especially located on top ...

                Well, this is not true at all, for the sake of interest, read the instructions on the small business for the DP machine gun, if my memory serves me, the fire is fired in short bursts of 3-5, or 4-6 shots
                1. 0
                  15 August 2016 17: 46
                  I guess I put it wrong ... Not continuous, but long.

                  And in this form, "Bran" is no better than Ak.
    2. 0
      13 August 2016 12: 43
      Disk stores are rather unreliable, so a full-fledged machine gun must necessarily have tape power. The best WWII machine gun is the German MG-42.
  7. +5
    12 August 2016 10: 28
    The MG 34 is not impressive anymore ..
    About MG 42 I generally keep quiet.
    The British in arms have always been incorrigible retrograde ...
    1. +9
      12 August 2016 11: 19
      MG-34 and MG-42 are not light machine guns. These are single machine guns and here the Germans jumped all over. And the rate of fire is different and opportunities. Therefore, comparing them is not entirely correct.
      1. 0
        13 August 2016 09: 28
        Yes everything is correct. While reading, I also noticed the rate of fire. "Bren" is comparable to our "DP". Ours had 600 rounds per minute ... And MG machine guns, they were a step or two ahead in the development of small arms at that time.

        I remember a very interesting interview with our great poet Mikhail Tanich. Very figuratively, he showed the intensity of fire "MG" and "DP" ... First: "P-shshshsh ...", and the second: "Knock-knock - knock" ... It's clear that the "MG" had a rate of fire 1200, I will not check, sorry if I was a little mistaken ... I am writing from memory ...
  8. +2
    12 August 2016 12: 53
    Holek. One of the "Fathers" of modern firearms.
    1. 0
      13 August 2016 12: 54
      It is a pity that his name is not well known to the general public. Israeli software Uzi was made according to the scheme of the Czechoslovak prototype, like all other software with a part of the shutter running onto the barrel.
  9. +6
    12 August 2016 13: 49
    The author constantly confuses the rate of fire and rate of fire. 500v / min is the TEMP of firing. The practical (combat) rate of fire of machine guns of this type is about 150v / min, most likely even lower here, due to the small capacity of the store.

    step by step is translated "step by step". A step in English is more like rung or stair.

    The author did not disclose anything special in the "brand" to us, and it remains unclear what this gentleman has to do with it.

    British small arms in the 20th century were generally sloppy, especially against the background of the Germans and Americans, and in Soviet times, our leaders also moved forward. The Anglo-Boer War very clearly showed the English problems with the shooting, all the other wars of the 20th century only confirmed.
    1. +1
      12 August 2016 14: 08
      Quote: murriou
      The author did not disclose anything special in the "brand" to us, and it remains unclear what this gentleman has to do with it.

      How do you read inattentively. This is the opinion of the person who fought with him. Now it doesn't matter how he thought of it. He fought with him. This is his opinion, what is there to disclose? As for "step by step", then ... language is a complex thing, multivalued. The British also rain like a cat and a dog.

      - The Boer War very clearly showed the English problems with the rifle, all other wars of the 20 century only confirmed.

      And what are these problems?
    2. +2
      12 August 2016 15: 36
      I must agree with you: a) the rate of fire with such a store will be below 150v / m. He also expected when they say what he stands out from? I personally like DP.b) The Germans are traditionally strong in small arms. As an example, I can name: Parabellum-Luger and English Webble-Cattle. The German is still a respected model and looks elegant in appearance, and the Englishman was quite reliable, but now not everyone remembers him and outwardly he gives in.
    3. +3
      12 August 2016 17: 34
      Quote: murriou
      step by step is translated "step by step".
      Correct
      Quote: murriou
      A step in English is rather a rung or stair.
      Only on ladders and a similar type, but on ordinary flights of stairs the same step. And the span itself in the kit is a stair.
      Yes, it is not for nothing that Comrade Stalin at the end of his career devoted so much attention to linguistics.
    4. 0
      13 August 2016 12: 57
      English firearms are still not up to par. They never knew how to make a good shooting. The best weapons in the west are Belgians, Czechs, Germans, and the worst are the British and French.
  10. 0
    12 August 2016 14: 53
    For some reason, I used to think that cartridges from the store were fed by gravity.
    1. +1
      12 August 2016 16: 24
      He was a two-row, gravity would not work! That's the highlight of its design. If it were single-row, one could still have done so, but not in the 2 series!
  11. +1
    12 August 2016 15: 27
    taste and color as they say ... Personally, I do not see anything graceful and convenient in it. Maxim's machine gun is more of a lively interest and respect for me (if this is from his contemporaries). In general, the term of use in service is the best indicator and evaluator of weapons and this machine gun is clearly not a favorite.
  12. +2
    12 August 2016 15: 32
    Strong machine!
  13. 0
    12 August 2016 16: 55
    like a snag, MG is much more beautiful
  14. Alf
    +1
    12 August 2016 20: 20
    And Bren was "extremely" technologically advanced, which showed the number of issued in comparison with the DP.
    In total, during the war years, about 300000 machine guns of all these types were produced.

    In just four years of the war, Soviet gunsmiths handed over a little more than 700 DP / DPM machine guns to the front
    1. 0
      12 August 2016 22: 09
      By the way, the English author Chris Shant highly appreciates our DP in all of his books. He writes that all 65 parts of which only 6 move, which is very technological, reliable, a very good store (!) Eliminating the double supply of weld cartridges - by the way, was a sin with Bran. He writes that production could be established in any workshop without loss of quality. So it is not surprising that a lot of them were released. I would say that this is the perfect light machine gun for total war.
      1. Alf
        +1
        13 August 2016 16: 19
        Quote: kalibr
        He writes that production could be established in any workshop without loss of quality. So it is not surprising that a lot of them were released. I would say that this is the perfect light machine gun for total war.

        It was just that before the war the USSR understood that weapons should not only be excellent in terms of performance characteristics, but also reliable, simple and inexpensive.
    2. 0
      5 January 2017 06: 15
      Still need to take into account 300 thousand DT / DTM.
  15. PKK
    +2
    12 August 2016 21: 22
    I think for a sniper, such a machine gunner is a gift of fate with a store looming upward. In addition, having stumbled on a parapet, you could not just gently peck your beak on the sharp edge of the store, get out of battle and iron the nailed place for a while. It’s more convenient to change the store from above than from below, it flies by itself, skills quickly arrive. The band teacher is more tactful, but abandoned it. The anti-aircraft Bren, this is nonsense with its low rate of fire, by the way the author didn’t tell how the automation works. Regarding rate of fire. I would prefer to hit 16 bullets in the target from MG sec than a few of Bren.
    1. 0
      12 August 2016 22: 03
      (To be continued)
    2. 0
      13 August 2016 18: 18
      Youtube has a movie about this machine gun. The English praise him. But they say that being too precise! Where you shoot, there you get. It is very difficult to hit the group goal, because there is no scatter. You start to drive the trunk is already a large scatter. There are also such disadvantages))).
  16. +1
    13 August 2016 09: 40
    The machine gun is Czech, and retained all the generic features of the "Austro-Hungarian" weapons school, not bad at all. Only they very much relied on their excellent machining, and the machine gun turned out to be too laborious. During WWII, the best was, IMHO, MG-42. This machine gun brought us a lot of grief. This, of course, did not save them, but it would be worse in service there, and our losses in the offensive would be smaller.
  17. 0
    13 August 2016 12: 32
    The fact that the sight and front sight are shifted, I guessed about it. But should this feature not affect the accuracy of the fire?
    1. +1
      14 August 2016 20: 28
      Weapon shooting is done so that the line of sight takes into account the deflection of the front sight; therefore, it does not matter where it is in the center or to the left, correctly calculated devices will still aim the barrel where it is needed. Once Bran was distinguished by high accuracy of shooting, which was noted by everyone who used it.
  18. 0
    13 August 2016 18: 15
    A little off topic. I have a friend. He himself is from Volgograd. Once brought a military souvenir. A rusty piece of metal cartridge tape. Three pieces of our cartridges, and the next English. Someone did not notice. The English cartridge is a bit more authentic. It is possible that this mistake cost someone's life. Somehow, these cartridges turned out to be in Stalingrad.
  19. +1
    20 August 2016 20: 19
    I always read military memoirs of tankmen, self-propelled guns, pilots, etc. with pleasure, so I can’t ask - where on the boundless expanses of the Internet can you find the aforementioned book by V.P. Chibisova "English tanks at the Steep Log"? Moreover, it is so recommended for reading. Thanks in advance to the one who answers!
  20. -2
    21 May 2021 16: 50
    Thank you for the article.
    1. 0
      26 May 2021 10: 23
      Thanks for the minus.
      1. +1
        27 May 2021 08: 31
        thanks again for less

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"