Ladies and gentlemen! Recently, on the "Military Review" flashed several articles on the education system. Reading the articles themselves and comments to them, I noticed that many do not quite know the situation and do not understand the issue under discussion. The stereotypes of 90's and the first half of zero years dominate strongly - everything falls apart, there is no money.
Believe me, there are a lot of problems in the education system, but everything is not so terrible at the same time. I know this as an employee of an educational institution. I work for the second year, before that I worked in organizations that are far from education.
Well, okay, this is, as they say, a proverb, and here is a fairy tale. On the Internet, including on the website "Military Review", the question of Dmitry Medvedev's words addressed to teachers with a proposal to go into business is strongly discussed. To be honest, I am not happy with our prime minister, but in this situation, I believe that his answer is quite normal and, moreover, the answer of a person who knows what he is talking about.
Let's take it in order: Gadzhi Kurbanov said that teachers receive within 10-15 thousands of rubles, and this is very little. At the same time, facts of the fact that in the “West” the teacher and the doctor are very good, immediately come to mind. This is really true, confusing another, but the specified 10-15 thousands per month, is this also true? Hand on heart, I will say yes! However, it is necessary to take into account a number of nuances.
A teacher’s salary depends on many factors. Well, for example, the salary can be 6000 (six thousand) rubles, and the salary in 4-6 is more than once. In addition to salary, in the formation of earnings play a big role "hours", that is, the number of lessons. The 40-45 lesson of minutes is “an hour”, the student “couple” is two hours. Surcharge is made for each hour. In order to receive 10 thousand rubles per month, it is enough to come to work three times a week and read for two hours. That is, it came to the 8 clock, and in 10 it is already free. I read two lessons, filled out a journal, and that’s it! So three times a week. Forced to quit four times, no problem, get 15 thousands. I see no reason to pay more in this situation (perhaps this is a biased opinion of a person who works 5 days a week from 8 to 17 hours, in general 40 hours according to the Labor Code of the RF).
There are a minority of such teachers in any educational institution, the maximum is 10% of the entire teaching staff. At the same time, these people most often combine work, or it’s just additional income. For example, we have an assistant deputy director for water resources management (educational work) three times a week. A sort of mass entertainer. Three times a week he collects talents in the assembly hall, where they sing, dance, etc., etc. Then (about once a month) perform in front of a wide audience. By the way, if there is a problem with the volume of knowledge of modern children (well, against the background of us “Soviet”), then everything is fine with talents, especially if you show assistance.
So this trick maker works 6 hours per week and gets 8-10 thousand per month. What he does in his spare time, I don’t know, maybe where he works.
In addition, there are a couple of teachers with the same schedule (the teachers, however, the schedule), but these people either earn extra money, that is, they have a main job elsewhere, or they are comfortable with their retirement pension. Not much troublesome, but also an extra penny to retirement.
Most often, these are specialists of a very narrow profile, for example, "Life Safety" is read by a military retiree.
However, the question of Haji Kurbanov was about young teachers. Young teachers who have specialized education will immediately be given more hours, so the salary of about 20 thousand is guaranteed. At the same time, there is considerable growth that Medvedev spoke about. You can increase the number of hours if a person is purposeful, has pedagogical and administrative skills, this is real. A normally demanded teacher who goes to work every day receives 25-30 thousand rubles.
You can continue to get a cabinet (classroom), I mean the room, and get an increase in wages.
Especially a large surcharge, if you instruct the classroom management (supervision). With educational talent and administrative skills (there is enough red tape, but the main thing is “education”!) It is quite possible to achieve this. Wages will be from 30 thousand rubles.
Well, things like service will not be analyzed, since the question was about “young” specialists.
So the young teacher can pass the above path in the period from 2 to 5 years. It all depends on his responsibility, discipline, pedagogical and educational talent. It may be faster, but this is necessary on the advice of the prime minister in the field of business. It is believed that the merchants row money Nemer, it is true that they forget that every second one goes bankrupt at the very beginning, but this is not the case.
In principle, Medvedev said the same thing, only in general terms, and it is correct, because the meeting was in the format of a press conference, and not a lecture hall on a specialized topic.
Now in the period of the international information war, when so much dirt flies into our state, people, society, and is not deserved or indiscriminately, when our failures and failures are noticed, and with relish it is relieved, we must try not to rush into ourselves.
How many such things are walking on the Internet, for example, in Russia, pension 8-9 thousand. And you can not prove to anyone that about 5% of pensioners receive such a pension, most often, who did not work at all, and receive old age. The bulk, about 80%, receives from 12 thousands and more. But the figure is exaggerated 7, 8, well, 9 thousands, as the maximum.
Another example is about the same Medvedev, but also about pensions. This is when "there is no money, but you hold on." When there was a surge of publications on this topic, I, without reading, for one headline, I thought that the pension was canceled altogether. No, well, the truth was such an impression, and not on the Ukrainian, but on our sites, that everything was gone, there is no money even for pensioners, in general, we are merging the country.
It turns out that there is no money for indexing pensions. A pension as received, and will receive. However, since Medvedev is not popular in the country, it means that you can pour dirt.
I remember from the classics "Over whom you laugh, you laugh at yourself." Yes, yes, this is our prime minister, although we did not tame him. Although the presidents elected. But in any case it is not necessary to throw a stone at themselves once more without understanding.
Personally, my opinion is that the prime minister and the president are really “tandem”, just one where victory and achievement, the second where it is not desirable to soil oneself, but it is necessary to do these unpopular, sometimes not even clear things.
Now they pay a lot of attention to "fakes", and so the best way to deal with them is the ability to sort out the issue before believing in it, let alone expressing one’s opinion.
On the issue of the premiere and teachers
- Author:
- Bureaucrat