Military Review

Media: Ukrainian C-300 complexes located in Crimea will be mothballed

80
The Russian military leadership decided not to use the C-300 complexes remaining in the Crimea from the Ukrainian army, reports RIA News Post your military source.


According to him, "the Russian military group in the Crimea is armed with the latest air defense systems, missile defense C-400, which will protect the peninsula from any air attack."

C-400

Yesterday, the service center of the Almaz-Antey concern was opened in Sevastopol, which will be engaged in servicing the air defense systems located in the Crimea.

As the interlocutor noted, the newly opened center “will repair and maintain all air defense systems in service with the Crimea, including the newest C-400”.

Earlier in the Russian military, they said that in August, the regimental C-400 “Triumph” air defense system would be transferred to the Crimea.
Photos used:
http://www.gazeta.kg
80 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dry_T-50
    Dry_T-50 31 July 2016 12: 03
    +9
    Maybe send them to Abkhazia just in case
    1. oleg-gr
      oleg-gr 31 July 2016 12: 04
      +9
      Let them gather dust in the warehouse. So far, everything is normalizing, then they will agree, and there the terms of disposal will do. We cannot be blamed for theft. Ready to return ukrodobro. They do not take it themselves.
      1. 79807420129
        79807420129 31 July 2016 12: 12
        +44
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Ready to return ukrodobro.

        That they would again bring down some sort of civilian plane. Fuck, fuck. That's
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Let them gather dust in the warehouse. So far, everything is normalizing, then they will agree, and there the terms of disposal will do.

        The very thing. drinks hi
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 31 July 2016 12: 19
          +5
          Quote: 79807420129
          Quote: oleg-gr
          Ready to return ukrodobro.

          That they would again bring down some sort of civilian plane. Fuck, fuck. That's
          Quote: oleg-gr
          Let them gather dust in the warehouse. So far, everything is normalizing, then they will agree, and there the terms of disposal will do.

          The very thing. drinks hi

          Do you think they only had such complexes in Crimea? And nowhere else in Ukraine are they? I doubt it very much.
          1. Alex_Tug
            Alex_Tug 31 July 2016 13: 55
            +1
            Quote: Muvka
            only in the Crimea were such complexes? And nowhere else in Ukraine are they? I doubt it very much.


            Is there some more. In YouTube there was an APU convoy passage. There were in the convoy and Points U and S-300.
            1. Simple
              Simple 1 August 2016 00: 54
              0
              Quote: Alex_Tug
              Were in the column and Points U and C-300

              all expired
              1. Moore
                Moore 1 August 2016 06: 31
                0
                Quote: Just
                all expired

                When did this stop the horses (see the use of RK 9K79-1 “Tochka-U” in Ukraine)?
              2. The comment was deleted.
          2. dmi.pris
            dmi.pris 31 July 2016 18: 21
            +4
            Well there is. So, let there be more? Do not give a single bullet to villains .. Besides the last one in the barrel .. Shoot yourself.
            Quote: Muvka
            Quote: 79807420129
            Quote: oleg-gr
            Ready to return ukrodobro.

            That they would again bring down some sort of civilian plane. Fuck, fuck. That's
            Quote: oleg-gr
            Let them gather dust in the warehouse. So far, everything is normalizing, then they will agree, and there the terms of disposal will do.

            The very thing. drinks hi

            Do you think they only had such complexes in Crimea? And nowhere else in Ukraine are they? I doubt it very much.

            Quote: Muvka
            Quote: 79807420129
            Quote: oleg-gr
            Ready to return ukrodobro.

            That they would again bring down some sort of civilian plane. Fuck, fuck. That's
            Quote: oleg-gr
            Let them gather dust in the warehouse. So far, everything is normalizing, then they will agree, and there the terms of disposal will do.

            The very thing. drinks hi

            Do you think they only had such complexes in Crimea? And nowhere else in Ukraine are they? I doubt it very much.
          3. Orionvit
            Orionvit 31 July 2016 22: 57
            +1
            Do you think they only had such complexes in Crimea? And nowhere else in Ukraine are they? I doubt it very much.
            Read the article carefully. It is written in Russian that the conversation is only about those that remained in the Crimea. About the rest, let Ukraine have a headache. Although I personally think that the technical condition of these complexes is approximately the same as that of the Ukrainian Navy.
        2. ferdiperdozzz
          ferdiperdozzz 31 July 2016 14: 04
          +7
          Quote: 79807420129
          That they would again bring down some sort of civilian plane. Fuck, fuck. That's


          "Tu 154 was shot down by Russia. Proven in court, you have a gap," a friend from Kiev wrote to me yesterday. :)
          1. Großer feldherr
            Großer feldherr 31 July 2016 14: 20
            .
            Quote: ferdiperdozzz
            "Tu 154 was shot down by Russia. Proven in court, you have a gap," a friend from Kiev wrote to me yesterday. :)

            There are only indirect confirmations, on which the final verdict will never be accepted, it is not necessary to lie.
            Not caught, not a thief!!!
            1. evantropov
              evantropov 31 July 2016 17: 17
              +11
              Greetings from Sevastopol. I have a classmate (S. Balobanov) - the former deputy head of the SBU of Sevastopol. In 2001, he chaired a commission to investigate the case. There are several of his interviews to central channels (after the domination), where he says that the plane was undoubtedly shot down by Ukraine, but an order was given "from above" - ​​to lie about not being involved ...
            2. Simple
              Simple 1 August 2016 01: 04
              -1
              Quote: Großer Feldherr
              There is only indirect evidence

              Have you read these "confirmations"?
              1. Flight SBI1812 was attacked from above the "hill", and kaaaaak the current is known. Russian missiles from the S-300 "attack from above the VC" .. question: and nakuya along such an energy-consuming trajectory in the gravity field of the earth .. behind the scenes
              2. Practice shooting at the range of the 31st Research Center of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation at Cape Opuk: in the presence of delegations from 7 states. Used ground-based anti-aircraft missile systems S-200, S-300, S-125, complexes Buk, Kub, Ukrainian ships frigate "Sagaidachny" and corvette "Lutsk", as well as the ship of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation "Pytlivy", equipped with anti-aircraft missile systems " Wasp ", took part in the shooting at the Tu-143 unmanned reconnaissance aircraft, known as the" Flight "target. In total, 23 missiles were fired at the targets - "SBI1812 was shot down by the Russians", and why ... in the "court in Ukraine, they don't pay attention to such trifles"
              3. As if:
              3.1. In 13: 42 Moscow time, the radiation of radar equipment of the C-200В complex of Ukrainian air defense was stopped.

              3.2. According to the control data of the Russian Gelendzhik radar on October 4, 2001, a 30V5 SAM S 28V missile was observed in the air 200 seconds before the explosion at a distance of 50 km from the crash site.

              3.3. The report states that the Tu-143 Reis target three minutes before the Tu-154 disaster was destroyed by the fire of the Russian S-300 PS air defense system, located 11 km from the Ukrainian C-200V air defense system.
              BUT!
              But as a lawyer suggests paying attention to the performance characteristics of the S-200 and S-300 air defense systems ..
              And it went and went: about the passive GOS, about the illumination of the target for the 5В21В (В-860ПВ) missiles from the air defense missile system -С-300 belay

              "Do not forget that in 2001 Putin just got out of the scandal with the Kursk nuclear submarine, and then there is a loud scandal with the death of Israeli citizens." from the rationale for the S-300 version
              Indirect evidence of this is the fact that the court of Ukraine confirmed the innocence of the military in the crash of Tu-154 in the 2001 year.
              lol
              1. Alex_59
                Alex_59 1 August 2016 09: 16
                0
                Quote: Just
                and kaaaaak the current is known Russian missiles from the S-300 "attack from above the VC"

                Only C-300? True?
                Quote: Just
                and nakuya along such an energy-consuming trajectory in the field of gravity of the earth .. behind the scenes

                Victim of the exam in physics? The most energy-consuming trajectory when flying over a long range will be a straight line between the target and the SAM. The least energy-consuming is the most rapid departure of missiles to the discharged layers of the atmosphere, a long flight there, and diving at a target directly in front of it. Range grows at times. But only the latest versions of C-300ПМ shoot like that. P and PT do not have such a shooting algorithm.
                1. Simple
                  Simple 1 August 2016 13: 45
                  0
                  Quote: Alex_59
                  Only C-300? True?

                  Are you talking to me or with a vessel?
                  And what is the truth?
                  That "from above" the SAM attacks only a low-flying target. On the underlying one.
                  Well, there’s still: RCC with excess of its flight path on 50 m and attacks from above for ...
                  Are you a victim and answer? Was it the only missile that shot down SBI1812?

                  You yourself exactly answered:

                  Quote: Alex_59
                  Victim of the exam in physics?

                  You type already a victim and otit there enticed others?
                  Quote: Alex_59
                  The least energy-consuming is the most rapid departure of missiles to the discharged layers of the atmosphere, a long flight there, and diving at a target directly in front of it

                  A lot of stars, a little mind, arrogance brains scored





                  belay
                  Quote: Alex_59
                  C-300PM. P and PT do not have such a shooting algorithm.

                  Are you trying to convince me or ukrosud?

                  And for dessert, for UO
                  Quote: Alex_59
                  The least energy-consuming is the most rapid departure of missiles to the discharged layers of the atmosphere, a long flight there, and diving at a target directly in front of it.


                  It
                  the projection of the trajectory H, L plane is attached to the azimuthal angle on the target.
                  Tki Hork? fool
                  For reference, shooting at the simulator SR-71 .. I hope the victim of the exam will find the LTX SR-71
          2. Simpsonian
            Simpsonian 31 July 2016 14: 45
            .
            Tell him that he has a space at the very end - the Tu-154 was then Ukrainian. Therefore, Russia is always to blame ...
            1. asiat_61
              asiat_61 1 August 2016 04: 08
              +4
              Tell him that he had a gap - the Tu-154 was Ukrainian ////// Oh, Siberia Airlines, flew to Novosibirsk. Was that Ukraine then? And when did it run back to Siberia? Oh !!!!! 1
              1. Simpsonian
                Simpsonian 1 August 2016 13: 41
                -4
                /// therefore Russia is always to blame ///

                6 comrades are clearly thinking tight
        3. dmi.pris
          dmi.pris 31 July 2016 18: 18
          +1
          To give Old Man .. Lyakhi and Ukrainians will choke with anger ..
          1. Alex_Tug
            Alex_Tug 31 July 2016 18: 29
            0
            Quote: dmi.pris
            Old Man to give


            Old Man why? So that Ukrainians are driven back? He already has Russian.
      2. cniza
        cniza 31 July 2016 12: 12
        +7
        Quote: Sukhoy_T-50
        Maybe send them to Abkhazia just in case


        Go sell to Iran, because we deliver.
        1. Teberii
          Teberii 31 July 2016 12: 23
          +6
          The export option is different, so you can’t sell it.
          1. Mavrikiy
            Mavrikiy 31 July 2016 14: 18
            +6
            Quote: Teberii
            The export option is different, so you can’t sell it.

            Transfer DNR, as having the right to part of the military equipment of Ukraine. And there really can be useful.
          2. Simple
            Simple 1 August 2016 01: 12
            0
            Quote: Teberii
            The export option is different, so you can’t sell it

            yes in the Armed Forces of Ukraine such junk can be sold.
            C-300П/ПС/ПТ с ЗУР 5В55К (В-500К),5В55Р (В-500Р),5В55К (В-500К),5В55Р (В-500Р),5В55КД...
            90 km
            Not even 5В55У, missiles for the C-300ПТ-1 (5В55У) did not ship to the rogues ... Tk C-300ПТ-1 could be shot by the missiles 48Н6Е

            We do not violate MTCR (<300)
        2. In100gram
          In100gram 31 July 2016 19: 36
          0
          Quote: cniza
          Go sell to Iran, because we deliver

          What for? Who needs this stuff? Outdated complexes. Although working
      3. Aleksander
        Aleksander 31 July 2016 12: 38
        +10
        Quote: oleg-gr
        We cannot be blamed for theft. Ready to return ukrodobro. They do not take it themselves.


        This is NOT UK.dobrobo, this is CRIMEan good. Everything that was declared Crimean sovereignty on its territory was Crimean property.

        If Ukrainian property is recognized in Crimea, then Crimea also has ownership of the Ruin in the amount of at least 1 / 20 tanks, aircraft, nuclear power plants and other assets, in the end.
        You won’t figure it out, therefore, that in Crimea it is Crimean and, accordingly, it later became Russian.
        1. Alex_Tug
          Alex_Tug 31 July 2016 13: 58
          0
          Quote: Aleksander
          This is NOT UK.dobrobo, this is CRIMEan good.


          Alas, the property of the APU. If they declare war (2 years already screaming), it will be a captured weapon.
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. Amurets
        Amurets 31 July 2016 13: 28
        +2
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Let them gather dust in the warehouse. So far, everything is normalizing, then they will agree, and there the terms of disposal will do. We cannot be blamed for theft. Ready to return ukrodobro. They do not take it themselves.

        Yesterday or the day before yesterday, Admiral Kasatonov explained that the remnants of the fleet and armaments that they did not have time to transfer before the Donbass events, Dill would be received back when the issue with the Donbass was resolved and peace came there.
      6. Mitek
        Mitek 31 July 2016 13: 55
        +1
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Let them gather dust in the warehouse. So far, everything is normalizing, then they will agree, and there the terms of disposal will do. We cannot be blamed for theft. Ready to return ukrodobro. They do not take it themselves.

        Yeah, and they give us 3 yards of greenery?) Horseradish (I'm talking about a plant, not about what you thought) to them all over the face. 300ki there are of course old, not undergoing modernization since the days of the USSR. Such only in canned food in case of a major war. For them, rockets are like a gamma after a bath, experienced personnel can be recruited from senior citizens and not only can they fly into Crimea. Expand the 300x regiment in the Crimea in case of war will not be superfluous. The old ones are old, but the complexes are magnificent and the air defense will strengthen very well, because a massive blow will have to be repelled.
      7. ARS56
        ARS56 31 July 2016 14: 52
        +8
        Tanks from Crimea in trains to Kharkov for refurbishment "returned"?
        But the tanks were no longer Ukrainian. Crimea proclaimed independence from the junta, and everything that was on the territory of Crimea began to belong to Crimea (as Ukraine took everything that was on its territory when separating from the USSR), and with reunification with Russia, everything was Russian. In Crimea, there can be legally nothing Ukrainian. If someone says that he is returning from the Crimea, or Ukrainian property is there, then he thereby belittles the status of Crimea to Ukrainian.
        1. Turkir
          Turkir 31 July 2016 22: 55
          0
          Absolutely correctly pose a question.
          Tired of clanking with them.
      8. sergeybulkin
        sergeybulkin 31 July 2016 17: 17
        +1
        Let them gather dust in the warehouse. While everything is normalizing, then they’ll agree

        First, let three lard be returned. There probably is nothing to preserve there, ukrohokhli I suppose for a long time already screwed up everything of value and turned it into scrap metal ... Yes, and the ancients they must have been like ... a mammoth. wassat
    2. stas
      stas 31 July 2016 12: 09
      +3
      Maybe in South Ossetia. With Abkhazians, it’s still incomprehensible, for the most part they looked towards Turkey.
      But in any case, hold the cap. repair and modernization, and apply as necessary. Buyers will be found.
      1. Alex_Tug
        Alex_Tug 31 July 2016 14: 10
        0
        Quote: stas
        hold cap repair and modernization, and apply as necessary. There are buyers.


        It's not gonna go. This dill would do. They don’t smell like money ... steal and sell.
        Why in the South Ossetia S-300 complexes? Announce an unmanned zone over Georgia? Not necessary.
    3. HAM
      HAM 31 July 2016 12: 09
      +3
      It’s not necessary to take them away from sin - the Ukrainian missile systems strive to bring someone down on their own, maintenance was probably not normal.
      1. captain
        captain 31 July 2016 12: 13
        +12
        Svidomo can not give anything. There is such a saying; how long is a fool glass ....
        1. Lord_Bran
          Lord_Bran 31 July 2016 13: 41
          0
          So let come and take away. Who's stopping something? We are building, under guard, in transit through the Crimea to Magadan, to cut down the forest.
        2. evantropov
          evantropov 31 July 2016 17: 20
          +1
          Right. Matches for children are not toys ...
      2. SSR
        SSR 1 August 2016 04: 57
        0
        Quote: HAM
        It’s not necessary to take them away from sin - the Ukrainian missile systems strive to bring someone down on their own, maintenance was probably not normal.

        Banter banter but unforgettable about 08.08.08, who helped rodents?
    4. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 31 July 2016 12: 24
      +3
      But the territory of warehouses is probably more needed for basic needs, and not for storing supposedly trash. All the same, funds will be used even for the minimum security of the complexes. And what does "the power structures of Crimea" mean? Or can strategic weapons belong to regional structures, and not the RF Ministry of Defense?
      Some misunderstandings with these complexes. It seems that the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation recognizes these complexes as belonging to Ukrostan. Although there is a good proverb: What has fallen from the cart, you can’t cut it with an ax.
      1. Khariton
        Khariton 31 July 2016 12: 27
        -3
        Ukrainian S-300 systems located in Crimea will be mothballed

        After Ukrainians, you need to sort it all out ... Everything is rusty there! Everyone smeared with grease ..)))))
    5. Altona
      Altona 31 July 2016 13: 07
      0
      Quote: Sukhoy_T-50
      Maybe send them to Abkhazia just in case

      ----------------------
      It must be dropped during transportation, and well so that everything is in the trash at once. How WADA "dropped" the cones of American athletes with samples in 25 years. And ends in the water. "Punish" the representatives of the carrier company, and return the scrap metal, especially the control machines. This is probably the best thing. laughing
    6. INVESTOR
      INVESTOR 31 July 2016 14: 35
      0
      Quote: Sukhoy_T-50
      Maybe send them to Abkhazia just in case


      Or to Syria .. repeat
    7. Simple
      Simple 1 August 2016 00: 53
      0
      Quote: Sukhoy_T-50
      Maybe send them to Abkhazia just in case

      Shhhh. There is Syria ... and many other normal countries.
      And on paper: yes "in stock", shrinkage, shrinkage is the standard.
  2. Hannibal Lecter
    Hannibal Lecter 31 July 2016 12: 07
    +3
    I propose to return S-300 missiles to Kiev under their own power.
    1. moskowit
      moskowit 31 July 2016 12: 11
      +3
      It's you, darling, got excited ...
  3. Igor V
    Igor V 31 July 2016 12: 13
    +7
    It’s better not to touch them, they are probably all bitten. smile
  4. viktor.
    viktor. 31 July 2016 12: 15
    +9
    Quote: hannibal lecter
    I propose to return S-300 missiles to Kiev under their own power.

    Yes, no, why Kiev will suffer the destruction of the people, it is possible to transfer them to the DPR and LPR Ukraine as its own territory, as a sign of goodwill to the government of UKROPIA laughing
    1. NIKNN
      NIKNN 31 July 2016 12: 48
      +3
      Quote: anna1980
      Yes, no, why Kiev will suffer the destruction of the people, it is possible to transfer them to the DPR and LPR Ukraine as its own territory, as a sign of goodwill to the government of UKROPIA

      There are a lot of offers, this is the best, but if you take into account that the Ukrainian Air Force as such is not there, and maintaining the complexes in the money base costs optimally for storage.
  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 31 July 2016 12: 21
    0
    Dispose of due to expiration of storage periods. Undermining. Svidomity tired, and such a weapon in their hands - a threat to everything that flies in a fairly large radius. In short, matches for children are not toys!
  6. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 31 July 2016 12: 25
    +1
    It is necessary to sell it, and not to store or donate to Syria, Armenia, Greece, Cuba, etc., there is a choice.
    1. lwxx
      lwxx 31 July 2016 13: 02
      0
      Greece? !! Is it normal that she is a NATO member country? Sometimes you have to think.
      1. Lord of the Sith
        Lord of the Sith 31 July 2016 13: 25
        +4
        Quote: lwxx
        Greece? !! Is it normal that she is a NATO member country? Sometimes you have to think.

        Do you know that Greece has S-300 systems? wink
        1. lwxx
          lwxx 31 July 2016 14: 16
          -1
          The same configuration? Or is it still export? In Ukraine, s300 is like ours. Let the old ones, but do not scatter.
  7. Abbra
    Abbra 31 July 2016 12: 28
    +4
    We must invoice Ukraine for the storage of canned food ...
    1. Alex_Tug
      Alex_Tug 31 July 2016 14: 22
      0
      Quote: Abbra
      We must invoice Ukraine for the storage of canned goods.

      correct solution. If they don’t pay, then take it back from the debt.
  8. PKK
    PKK 31 July 2016 12: 35
    +3
    It is necessary to bring complexes to mind, electronics, equipment and let them stand on conservation, in case of conflict, roll out and the way they work reinforce air defense. There is no unnecessary air defense.
  9. loki565
    loki565 31 July 2016 12: 40
    -4
    Well, it’s impossible to rely on the c400; the missiles are not endless; in the US submarine there are 100 cruise missiles; if there is a complete shooting, I doubt that with 400 there are enough missiles to hit all targets ...
  10. yuriy55
    yuriy55 31 July 2016 12: 52
    -5
    If anything, take away 3th debt ... wink
    1. Alex_Tug
      Alex_Tug 31 July 2016 14: 24
      +2
      Quote: yuriy55
      If anything, take away 3th debt


      They are not even enough for interest.
  11. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 31 July 2016 12: 53
    +2
    First you need to check their technical condition. And if you give, then, only in LDNR!
    1. Khariton
      Khariton 31 July 2016 13: 09
      -3
      Quote: Expelling Liberoids
      First you need to check their technical condition. And if you give, then, only in LDNR!

      They do not need them, we cover them to the fullest ... But the tanks, for a breakthrough to Kiev, could be thrown ...!
      1. Alex_Tug
        Alex_Tug 31 July 2016 14: 32
        0
        Quote: Expelling Liberoids
        First you need to check their technical condition. And if you give, then, only in LDNR!

        Quote: Chariton
        They do not need them, we cover them to the fullest ... But the tanks, for a breakthrough to Kiev, could be thrown ...!


        Vitaly, get well.
        You can’t be trusted with a pen; indirectly, you say that Russia shot down a Boeing.
        Just LDNR they can be put, she is Ukraine. And there are tanks in warehouses in Mariupol. (plus for the patriot)
  12. krops777
    krops777 31 July 2016 13: 30
    +1
    The Russian military leadership decided not to use the S-300 systems remaining in the Crimea from the Ukrainian army

    Give Syria to them more needed.
  13. Ferdinant
    Ferdinant 31 July 2016 13: 34
    0
    They are unnecessary to Ukraine
  14. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 31 July 2016 14: 00
    +1
    Conserving money is worth it. If Ukraine does not need them, let them go to colanders.
    If necessary, sell them these colanders.
  15. Zomanus
    Zomanus 31 July 2016 14: 09
    +1
    Why, collect everything de ... good that belongs to ukrovermaht in one place and let it be stored there.
    Of course, there can be no talk of any scheduled maintenance.
    Also, to save money for storage, if they want to return their good back.
    And you shouldn’t use it yourself, it’s all exactly what to take from the spoon lowered in the zone.
  16. Retvizan 8
    Retvizan 8 31 July 2016 14: 34
    0
    Stop playing honest and decent with them, they still won’t appreciate it! They took all of ours! They are not going to return the debt to us at all. You don’t have to sell it yourself.
  17. Disorder
    Disorder 31 July 2016 14: 53
    0
    These complexes went to Ukraine from the USSR. It is neither possible to use nor sell such junk. They stand for conservation, and then for disposal.
  18. proud
    proud 31 July 2016 15: 09
    0
    Is Russia really so perfectly covered in sky that they don’t know where to use the old but the S-300? I do not believe! In some regiments, the Beeches are still covering the sky, while the range of both of them cannot even be compared, in a word, the circus! Although if Russia is called exclusively Moscow, St. Petersburg and their regions, as well as Crimea, then they may not be needed for hell!
  19. Barakuda
    Barakuda 31 July 2016 15: 41
    0
    Ukrainian ass, fly even under Vasilkov. We are ashamed to see for ourselves. Three hours of flight, then silence. Like three meals a day - Monday, Wednesday, Friday. Russian MIGI-Sushki arrived, Belbek fell into place. At least he removed Trukhu from the L-39. Yaki was also noticed.
  20. Evil 55
    Evil 55 31 July 2016 15: 49
    +3
    In UKRALIN, every good thing inherited from the Mighty USSR goes through several stages: Nationalization-Ukrainization-Conservation-Utilization ... It’s better THIS, than the combat use of Soviet "BUKs" in the war 08.08.08 ...
  21. masiya
    masiya 31 July 2016 19: 08
    0
    Let everything stand as it is at the time of the departure of the APU from the Crimea, there is no need to conserve, (extra expenses), no need to transfer, it cannot be done at all, and just let it be as it is, well, maybe after eleven years about something with a reasonable part Ukrainians will be able to agree, then they will get ... !!! ... what remains of both technology and boats ... at the bottom!
  22. huntsman650
    huntsman650 31 July 2016 20: 14
    0
    That's right, a hundred pounds of junk, it is more expensive to restore yourself, the frequencies are known. easy to crush. the ammunition is expired, according to the terms of the FHI, the flight is not predictable. and when we make peace we will return to the ass. it will be necessary to organize joint air defense. Yes, you need to set your own stranger.
  23. Orionvit
    Orionvit 31 July 2016 23: 10
    0
    Quote: ARS56
    Tanks from Crimea in trains to Kharkov for refurbishment "returned"?
    But the tanks were no longer Ukrainian. Crimea proclaimed independence from the junta, and everything that was on the territory of Crimea began to belong to Crimea (as Ukraine took everything that was on its territory when separating from the USSR), and with reunification with Russia, everything was Russian. In Crimea, there can be legally nothing Ukrainian. If someone says that he is returning from the Crimea, or Ukrainian property is there, then he thereby belittles the status of Crimea to Ukrainian.
    Frankly speaking, there is nothing Ukrainian in Ukraine. Was there a referendum in March 1991? Was. All these newly appeared "states" from the former republics are not legal. That's where separatism was. And now a purely separate "state" Ukraine is still shouting about some kind of "separatism" on "its territory"? According to all laws, everything that is on the territory of Ukraine and other post-Soviet "countries" is de jure the property of Russia, as the legal successor of the USSR. Just after 1991. everybody pretended that everything was "normal", and now they are pouring mud on Russia.
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. Zord3375
    Zord3375 1 August 2016 08: 20
    0
    I myself "drove" I think they just won't stand
  26. Protos
    Protos 2 August 2016 23: 44
    0
    For these S-300s, back in the 2000s, a flight was in Sevastopol (air defense brigade) of the AFUshny terrible lieutenant as part of an organized criminal group "removed" secret blocks and dumped to the Turks. The cart was in OdVO.
    And it's useless to tinker with the remaining S-300s - there the current "imitators" 9F88 remained alive, the rest of the meat.