Military Review

And if the US president becomes an American?

66
The topic of the American election is not particularly interesting for Russians. Why should we bother with the problems of another state? Let even such a monster as the States? We will proceed from the fact that it will still be necessary to live with any president. And in vain ...


No, we will live, of course. And we will endure the president of America, no matter who they become. Even we will meet as a dear guest. Politics ... A neighbor or a partner is there, he just is, and this is a given. Even if we don’t like a neighbor, it’s impossible to pick up your house and move it to another place. Our village is small. In a sense, Earth. And the question of who should endure the house is very controversial.

So, Trump begins to push Clinton hard on all fronts. Understanding the interest of Americans to experiment in domestic politics, Trump suggests once again to review the results of the previous work. What the black prize laureate of the Peace Prize brought to this world, and how productive and useful it was.

Americans in essence are people who are not particularly interested in world politics. Why do we need world politics if we are the center of the world? And we define this policy ourselves! This is the most common opinion among Americans. The USA is the navel of the Earth, and that’s it. Well, they have been taught this way since childhood. The films show the greatness of American science, sport, and the army. And, having looked around, Americans see the whole world in neighboring stores, clinics, universities. The whole world, that is, those who could, by virtue of knowledge, intelligence, grasp, escape from the wilds of poverty and the backwardness of their countries to their country of great opportunities.

Let me remind you who Donald John Trump is. In fact, Trump is the embodiment of the "American dream" in nature. Once, in the distant 1885 year, his grandfather and grandmother stepped on the blessed land of America. Emigrated from Germany. Hence the German surname with a purely American name. An emigrant mother from Scotland. However, it cannot boast of a long American pedigree. Arrived in the US in 1930 year.

And here is a simple guy from the later immigrants could achieve everything. He was able to become one of the richest people in America. Could be everything. At the same time, as befits a "American hero," he was famous not only for his freedom in his statements, but also for his rather extravagant behavior.

When Donald Trump announced his desire to become the president of the United States, the majority perceived it as another billionaire whim. Why does he need it? "Cheese in butter" envies his life. So no one took Trump seriously. Play out and go "make money".

But in the end, having scattered 16 rivals in the corners of the political ring, Trump became a US presidential candidate. In Cleveland, the convention of the US Republican Party called this name. It was there that we saw that Trump, who “knows how to make money,” and at the same time remains a favorite of Americans. Trump's speech at the convention is worth reading. As they would say "pique vests" from a famous work, Trump is the head ...

And there is some confidence in the victory of this guy in the elections. Confidence that in January he will move to the White House. It is clear that to provide all possible obstacles for this is impossible. But with a fair fight, there are no other options. You say: where is honesty, and where is America ... Well, yes, but you understand that just the billions of Trump may well buy this very honesty. Albeit in the supermarket is not for everyone, but they can.

The whole point is who Clintonicha continues to sing the song that the Americans listened to when she was blessed. Yes, with variations, but the essence is the same. And the average man in the United States is not that “our hearts demand change,” rather, hearts demand that if today lives well, then it should be at least as good.

And in this regard, the Clinton clan is not so much like a curse that hangs like over the Bush, but there is nothing much to boast about.

And here, Trump, who is not politically dirty, is still that rival.

Let's try to imagine what will happen if he wins. And not hypothetical, but quite probable.

An American comes to power in the USA! Not in the sense of an American by birth and citizenship. American in the sense of thinking. American from the "navel of the Earth." And what will this mean for this very Earth?

I think "business shark" will pursue a policy in the same vein as in its firms. Everything for the prosperity of the company. Only the "firm" will be the United States.

We have already said that the States are still quiet, but they are changing the vector of their foreign policy. It felt the Europeans themselves. The Turks felt it themselves, it feels Ukraine, the Baltic States. Even those who have lost their countries thanks to the “peacemaker” Obama also feel this.

Nothing personal. Just business. Why should Americans help losers? How much money is given to the Balts? How much is Ukraine? How much money did military operations take in Asia and Africa? And in the end? As a result, a layer of experts on “stealing” of help and transfer of funds to their own accounts appeared.

No, the United States, of course, will help. Same. But only so that they have the opportunity to repay debts ... the United States. Your debts Again, nothing personal. In business, money is not scattered. Money, on the contrary, earn.

Trump can win the elections in November also because the most important thing for most Americans is their own safety. So, it is precisely the proposals of Trump, and not Clinton, that will be accepted by society. The United States is tired of the constant tragedies in their cities. Tired of corpses. American, by the way, corpses. And only Trump speaks openly about strengthening the fight against crime, about fighting terrorism inside the country, about radical measures against Islamic extremists.

Such a position allows him to earn political points bags.

And now by region. First of all, Europe. The United States under Trump will continue the policy of "full security support" for Europeans. Only now Europeans will now pay for this security themselves. The habit of saving on our own armies and defenses will go into oblivion.

Naturally, the question of NATO arises. The block is strong enough. Do you agree? But on whose money? Business ... Dear Europeans, you want help in the fight against terrorism - shell out. Or fight on your own. And NATO has repeatedly shown its weakness without the American leading and nursing hands. Toy armies of most block members are needed only for extras. These are the same flies that sit on the ox's back and shout: "We plowed!"

It turns out that the Germans, the French and the British can live more or less quietly. The backbone of American domination in Europe, Trump will not touch. Yes, and the economies of these countries are not particularly affected by some increase in military spending. And maybe win.

Although the "quiet being" of Germany in this interpretation sounds somewhat mockingly.

Russia. The game in a rogue country is fed up with everything. Especially since this game brings completely opposite "prizes". Much has been written about Russia’s economy and political influence. Therefore, it is a shameful time for readers to take up the next calculations in this question.

But it is worth talking about the fact that the West, which means the United States, by its actions, is increasingly losing influence in Russia. The rupture of economic ties is killing the influence of transnational monopolies on the Russian economy. Banking sanctions and "scandals" frightened Russian investors. The rupture of military-political ties led to the creation of many controversial situations. And again, to the strengthening of Russia's influence in the world.

So, Trump-businessman will force Trump-President to start the game back. Sanctions will be "eroded." Amendments and other measures will be taken to "save face", but in essence, the Americans need to return relations with Russia to the previous level. Of course, Putin is not a politician who can be intimidated or forced. But there is hope that he will not participate in the next election.

Simply put, Trump is quite an adequate and pragmatic politician for us. And negotiate with him is quite possible. Again the classic is just business.

And what about Ukraine? And here comes the "time to scatter stones." Ukraine has become uninteresting for the United States. With the rupture of economic ties with Russia, the majority of Ukrainian industries have become unprofitable. And as a matter of fact, not necessary for Western businessmen. With the loss of the Crimea, even as the location of the NATO units is not interesting. Not worth it, in monetary terms, such a territory of such costs. There are Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, the Baltic States. Where within each country, unlike in Ukraine, everything is relatively calm. And in direct comparison - quiet and grace.



Feed the country, which for a quarter of a century only did, that was eating the inheritance received from the ancestor, Trump will not.

Many still do not understand the reason for the constant “delaying” of the next IMF tranche for Ukraine. Why they used to give, closing their eyes to everything, and today they are looking for reasons to "postpone the decision of the issue." And the reason is in Trump! More precisely, in the one who will "live in the White House" after Obama.

European analysts no less than we understand what will happen. And they understand that the arrival of a cold businessman with an iron grip on politics will make things worse. And the money that is meant for Ukraine may very well be needed by Europe itself. The fragile world of Europe is under constant attack by migrants. Security is expensive.

So, for Ukraine in the near future the main thing is to catch up with Mongolia in terms of GDP per capita. Just something to raise it twice.

What is described in this article, in many ways already voiced by politicians from different countries. Largely voiced in America itself. Changes are coming. And these changes will be quite serious.
Author:
66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dam
    Dam 1 August 2016 06: 16
    +29
    So far, fortune-telling for coffee: will it be, will it not? But no matter who comes to power, nothing will change globally, the president in mattress will not decide what course the country will go, rather a congress, or rather the military-industrial lobby. At best, rhetoric will be softer. In general, hope for God, but don’t betray yourself, you need to hope for yourself, and not for the next reptiloid from the oval office
    1. Mifcada
      Mifcada 1 August 2016 08: 34
      +4
      Barack Hussein Obama led anti-Israeli politics throughout his reign. Any of the current candidates is better for us than Obama. Of them, Trump is preferable for us, but his chances are small ...
      1. Dim Bes
        Dim Bes 1 August 2016 11: 32
        +7
        Excuse me, Dear, but with which side does the Israeli policy concern us? Also, which candidate will be best for you. Have you left (or were you taken out) from the Russian Federation? And you like it in your new homeland. Well, be happy! But why then climb into everything, sorry, holes with your opinion ??? The only ones who are worth every lifetime attention are our veterans living in your Israel. Well, and in no way "repatriates", with whom we will now pay pensions .. and I'm afraid that almost ministerial ..
        1. Reserve officer
          Reserve officer 1 August 2016 14: 35
          +3
          It makes no difference to us who of them will be the president of the states. Choice - Kashchei the immortal or Baba Yaga?
          All the same, our Georgy Millar played all these roles better.
          These candidates needed to watch Alexander Rowe's fairy-tale films shot on Soyuzdetfilm, to learn the facial expressions and voice of Millard, and then there would be something to watch at this election debate. And so - boredom. They can only pour mud on each other.
          1. Mahmut
            Mahmut 1 August 2016 19: 26
            +3
            Presidential candidates are allowed to say anything with impunity and promise as much as they like. But as soon as he comes to power they will put on a short leash with a strict collar and explain who is the master of the house and where you can not shit. If he understands, he will live.
            1. DanSabaka
              DanSabaka 1 August 2016 22: 36
              0
              That's it!
              Abama, too, in election speeches promised a lot of things to voters .... But Guantanomo didn’t close, he didn’t put things in Iraq, he not only didn’t withdraw troops from Afghanistan, but he also plans to increase the contingent .... And he didn’t solve any social problems inside the country as promised....
              So with Trump, it is not clear what will happen, fulfill promises or earn loot by lobbying the interests of the military-industrial complex and financiers ....
      2. Ramzaj99
        Ramzaj99 1 August 2016 18: 49
        +1
        For Russia, by and large, no matter who wins there. US foreign policy is little dependent on presidents. They are turning the drill to unconditional military and financial world domination and will shove, destroying and putting sticks in the wheel to everyone who, in their opinion, prevents them from doing so. The only difference is that Hillary is an unequivocal and 100% increase in confrontation with NATO, and I honestly am even afraid to imagine what this might come to. All the crises of the Cold War may seem like toys, because there is no equilibrium as such, and America can go all in. Trump, no matter what he says now, they will also change the foreign policy line. The only thing is if they find a common language with Putin and freeze the confrontation. Rollback to normal relations is not possible now, too many political and financial forces are tied to this.
    2. Mavrikiy
      Mavrikiy 1 August 2016 10: 57
      0
      Quote: Damm
      So far, fortune-telling for coffee: will it be, will it not? But no matter who comes to power, nothing will change globally, the president in mattress will not decide what course the country will go, rather a congress, or rather the military-industrial lobby. At best, rhetoric will be softer. In general, hope for God, but don’t betray yourself, you need to hope for yourself, and not for the next reptiloid from the oval office

      "yes you are right, but the opposite is also possible"
      All preziki have cardboard. Who argues, but ... The US elite is not homogeneous. And this little devil didn’t jump out of the box by himself and no one helped him jump out. They just put it. And he will express the interests of certain circles. All the blah blahs he made will definitely strengthen the United States and everyone understands this. He is a statesman, and a fighter with globalists. Another thing is that state. The USA is yesterday. And are there any other ideas there?
    3. Megatron
      Megatron 1 August 2016 11: 39
      +2
      Russians have never lived as badly as under Obama!
    4. Donhapa
      Donhapa 1 August 2016 11: 48
      +3
      Quote: Damm
      So far, fortune-telling for coffee: will it be, will it not? But no matter who comes to power, nothing will change globally, the president in mattress will not decide what course the country will go, rather a congress, or rather the military-industrial lobby. At best, rhetoric will be softer. In general, hope for God, but don’t betray yourself, you need to hope for yourself, and not for the next reptiloid from the oval office

      God forbid if mad Kli (t) Orsha
  2. Valery Valery
    Valery Valery 1 August 2016 06: 20
    +13
    I don’t think America is ruled by its presidents!
    1. Uncle
      Uncle 1 August 2016 10: 48
      +5
      Well, yes, not the presidents, but the clans, and the president is the clan’s visiting card.
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 1 August 2016 11: 17
      +2
      "I don't think America is ruled by its presidents!" ////

      And rightly so. America is ruled by Congress. The President has the right
      veto Congress decisions, but Congress may block
      decrees of the President. So they should not quarrel, usually they compromise.
  3. strelets
    strelets 1 August 2016 06: 35
    +12
    With such a "super-democratic" electoral system as in the United States, it is generally unclear who will be able to push their candidate through. So just enjoy this show and wait.
    1. fennekRUS
      fennekRUS 1 August 2016 12: 38
      0
      Quote: strelets
      So just enjoy this show and wait.

      Moreover, of all the possible decisions over the past 5-10 years, for some reason, politicians have taken the least rational. It seems that pragmatism has given way to some kind of virtual fantasy in the heads of major leaders.
  4. Masya masya
    Masya masya 1 August 2016 06: 37
    +34
    Sitting at the table Obama, Merkel and Putin ...
    Merkel: Oh, I dreamed here that I became the president of the whole world.
    Obama: And you, Angela, had a dream that I became the president of the universe.
    Putin: And I dreamed that I didn’t approve any of you ...
    So be it! wink
    1. Mikado
      Mikado 1 August 2016 11: 32
      +5
      Quote: Masya Masya
      Sitting at the table Obama, Merkel and Putin ...
      Merkel: Oh, I dreamed here that I became the president of the whole world.
      Obama: And you, Angela, had a dream that I became the president of the universe.
      Putin: And I dreamed that I didn’t approve any of you ...
      So be it! wink

      I quote a joke that one of the members of the forum has already written a couple of years ago:
      Sitting Obama, Merkel, Hollande and others in front of a large magic ball, guessing.
      Merkel: "Tell us, big glass ball, in what year will the Third World War end?"
      Ball: "In 2022"
      Obama: "How much will a can of Coca-Cola cost after it?"
      Ball: "Fifteen cents"

      God be peace! The article is good, positive. We wait and see how this Trump will lead.
  5. Senior manager
    Senior manager 1 August 2016 06: 38
    +8
    Relations with the pragmatist Trump are easier to build, and they hopefully will be more predictable than with Clinton, but what kind of cocktail will result from the interference of shadow power in Trump's actions? Both candidates in their actions will be difficult for Russia. Wait and see.
    1. CONTROL
      CONTROL 1 August 2016 09: 17
      +1
      Quote: St. Propulsion
      what kind of cocktail will turn out when the shadowy government intervenes in Trump's actions?

      ... "Shadow Power" can be brought out into the light! ...
    2. Skubudu
      Skubudu 1 August 2016 10: 06
      +2
      And for the Americans themselves, Donald Fredovich is the best candidate.
  6. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 1 August 2016 06: 51
    +12
    People!!! Do you seriously believe that something who wants to live peacefully and honestly and trade with Russia will be allowed to power in the United States? Yes, you are storytellers, or children. Whoever becomes president, sooner or later, but he, she, it, they, will "confirm" that Russia was and remains an "evil empire"!
    1. kin
      kin 1 August 2016 07: 02
      +3
      The Republican Party, if my memory serves me right, has been looking for an external enemy all the time since the 80s and fought with it. Who is the best external enemy now?
      1. Mikado
        Mikado 1 August 2016 11: 52
        +5
        Quote: kin
        The Republican Party, if my memory serves me right, has been looking for an external enemy all the time since the 80s and fought with it. Who is the best external enemy now?

        Obama is a Democrat, and no better. Here, as they say, democrats or republicans - I do not understand the grades of Mr. ..
    2. Waltasar
      Waltasar 1 August 2016 07: 16
      +3
      And if he does not agree with the opinion of the "shadow authorities", then there will be another lone maniac.
      Something quite a while ago in the states of the presidents did not kill.
      1. B.T.V.
        B.T.V. 1 August 2016 08: 41
        +1
        Quote: Waltasar
        Something quite a while ago in the states of the presidents did not kill.


        The other day, the one who encroached on Reagan, was released.
    3. Dimy4
      Dimy4 1 August 2016 10: 01
      +1
      People!!! Do you seriously believe that someone wishing to live peacefully and trade and trade with Russia will allow something to come to power in the United States?

      As if then his Oswald was not found on him.
  7. kin
    kin 1 August 2016 07: 01
    +4
    All this is good, beautifully written - with feeling, with skill. But, in my opinion, the author exaggerates the role of the individual in American history. The party comes to power, its lobby, various corporations feeding it and feeding at its expense. Is there a warrior alone in the field?
    1. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 1 August 2016 11: 28
      +1
      And think about it? Trump is not on his own. There are no billionaires on their own, the amounts are too large for one person. He expresses the interests of a strong team. Which one? Years through 70, perhaps descendants will find out ...
      Now something else is important for us. If the team, whose face is this person, wins, what will change? The good news is that SOMETHING WILL CHANGE, because the current American policy is extremely dangerous for us. Moreover, it is not even dangerous with an anti-Russian orientation. Clinton and her bunch of "specialists" are clearly inadequate! That's the problem.
      Clinton’s calculations and decisions are mostly incorrect. Madame Bummer, you cannot say otherwise. Inability to see the real picture, obvious inadequacy, total failures caused by this - so you can screw up anything. She is soaring. It seems to be - why not? The adversary’s power is a bad ruler, but it’s better for us ... but you can predict these reasonable decisions. And stupidity is limitless, so every time we find ourselves unprepared for the next splash of bullshit. Poorly. It’s bad for everyone.
      Trump will work for the United States, and not for some crazy ideas. Here is a solid foundation for any action and decision. He will accept such an agreement, for which there is no reason at all, here we will clearly agree, here we must give in, then he will give in, if we give him this ... Lavrov will be delighted. It’s easier right away, because there really is no point in a frostbitten confrontation.
      Our countries have a considerable field of maneuver in which we can MUTUALLY BENEFIT to work for prosperity, each for its own. Another thing is that this contradicts the supranational financial authority, which plays tac toe. Their game will suffer immediately if hysteria is replaced by politics, and the money will go to the Americans, and not to the financial tycoons with American surnames. I wonder what Trump and the team are counting on? Well, let's see ...
  8. domokl
    domokl 1 August 2016 07: 04
    +5
    Quote: kin
    . The party comes to power, its lobby, various corporations feeding it and feeding at its expense.

    Trump is just one of those who have been doing this for a very long time ... And then, who said that he is alone? He expresses precisely the opinion of this group of Americans. and they can afford to decide ...
    1. inkass_98
      inkass_98 1 August 2016 07: 35
      +9
      Here I agree, if Trump was approved as a candidate from the Republicans, then an influential group of capitalist gentlemen clearly stands behind him. Which at first slightly doubted their choice, and then decided not to appear in the role of Buridanov’s donkey, but put on a pragmatist.
      The Clintonsha with her hysterical statements only strengthened the opinion of the Republican elite that two Democrats in a row in the White House is too much, and Hillary can only be opposed by the same frostbitten (externally and in words) kid. And this "kid" managed to become a billionaire twice - once he went broke, but managed to get out, that is. he is far from, he knows his business.
      Mind and we understand that he will not kiss with Putin, but Trump somehow more purely human causes more sympathy than Clinton.
  9. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 1 August 2016 07: 14
    +8
    My soul I understand that from who will become president of the United States, the policy towards Russia will not change, but I really want the Clinton lost.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Erg
      Erg 1 August 2016 10: 06
      +2
      This grandmother scares me at all. Take a look at her facial expressions.
  10. VSZMK
    VSZMK 1 August 2016 07: 41
    +9
    On Monday, July 25, Trump announced that, as president, he will consider the possibility of creating military cooperation with Putin to fight the Islamic state, a terrorist group that controls the borders of Syria and Iraq, which will put an end to Russia's international isolation in connection with the coup in Ukraine and the capture of the Crimea.

    On Wednesday, July 27, Trump, exchanging compliments with Putin, went a step further, saying that he would consider Russia's claims to Crimea and lift the sanctions imposed on Russia in connection with the separatist uprising in Ukraine.

    The billionaire’s warning that he would ignore NATO’s position, which says that an attack on one is an attack on everyone, shocked the alliance, especially the three Baltic countries that were part of the USSR.
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 1 August 2016 07: 44
      +2
      Now, if all the election promises were fulfilled, then for Trump with two hands. But these are promises that, by and large, are not worth anything.
  11. rvRomanoff
    rvRomanoff 1 August 2016 07: 51
    +3
    The authors, in the "famous work" were piquant vests.
    1. viktorrymar
      viktorrymar 1 August 2016 08: 35
      +1
      These were strange and funny people these days.

      Almost all of them wore white picnic vests and boater straw hats. Some even wore hats made of darkened Panama straw. And already, of course, everyone was in the yellowed starch collars, from where the hairy chicken necks rose.
  12. Tsoy
    Tsoy 1 August 2016 07: 57
    0
    The topic of the American election is not particularly interesting for Russians.


    So do not care that half of Russians according to polls considers the elections important ...

    More than half of Russians (59%) believe that the outcome of the struggle for the presidency of the United States between Republican and Democratic candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton is important for Russia, according to VTsIOM.
    A nationwide poll of VTsIOM was conducted on July 9-10 in 130 settlements of 46 regions of Russia among thousands of 1,6 people. The margin of error does not exceed 3,5%.
    Voters with posters in support of US presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.



    http://ria.ru/politics/20160801/1473278328.html
  13. Stinger
    Stinger 1 August 2016 08: 01
    +3
    There is no difference between "Democrats" and "Republicans". There are differences. Some shoot first. and then they read out the rights, others first read out the rights, and then they shoot.
  14. Taygerus
    Taygerus 1 August 2016 08: 02
    +1
    the president in the usa, this is an elected talking head, if he begins to bend his policy at odds with the puppeteers, then, as is customary, they just utilize him, for me it’s better to have a dialogue with a pragmatic Trump than with a crazy hysterical woman
  15. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 1 August 2016 08: 08
    +2
    was there even one American president? or only immigrants can? there, even an African ruled the country
    1. Tsoy
      Tsoy 1 August 2016 08: 52
      +3
      Quote: seregatara1969
      or only emigrants can be? even African ruled the country


      Well, in general, they are all immigrants. Let it be in the nth generation, but still. When the chief of Cherokee or Apache becomes the head of state, then there will be an American president.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 1 August 2016 11: 23
        -5
        "Well, in general, they are all immigrants" ////

        This can be said about almost any inhabitant of the Earth.
        All the time there were global or local movements of peoples
        due to climate change, droughts, epidemics, populations
        other nations, etc.

        The Indians also came to America from Asia not so long ago by historical standards.
        1. Tsoy
          Tsoy 2 August 2016 18: 01
          0
          Quote: voyaka uh
          This can be said about almost any inhabitant of the Earth.


          And if we take it even deeper, then we are all negros. Africa is the cradle of human civilization. In addition to North Korea, there is a version of the superchuch Neanderthal, from which we all began our own kind ... hi
  16. Butchcassidy
    Butchcassidy 1 August 2016 09: 09
    +1
    Quote: Mifkada
    Barack Hussein Obama led anti-Israeli politics throughout his reign. Any of the current candidates is better for us than Obama. Of them, Trump is preferable for us, but his chances are small ...


    The Jewish lobby in the United States is closely linked to the Democratic Party and, as researchers say, Hillaryuga is much better than Trump has built ties with influential Jewish organizations in the United States. And they, accordingly, will support Clinton. Would it be better for Israel? Wait and see. The US-Israel relationship is a topic for another discussion.
  17. Awaz
    Awaz 1 August 2016 09: 11
    0
    there’s no need to even guess on the coffee grounds or something else. The system in the USA is more predictable than even in Russia. Clintonsha must win by all the rules of drama. Remember the Chekhov rifle on the wall. On the same principle, the black president came to power ... You can believe it, but soon there will also be an Indian president appearing. If Vova Putin does not outwit him.
  18. CONTROL
    CONTROL 1 August 2016 09: 20
    +1
    As they would say "muslin vests" from a famous work, Trump is the head ...
    ... with a ma-a-a-lazy amendment: "pike vests" ...
  19. CONTROL
    CONTROL 1 August 2016 09: 28
    0
    In general, Trump declares a rational course for the United States - not "intensive development" due to the concentration of financial capital, but, in fact, worthless green papers, but a conditionally "extensive path of development" in the emerging sixth technological order of the economy and creating prerequisites for the transition to the seventh ...
    A man looks far away! smart ... looks like a jew ...
  20. Freeman
    Freeman 1 August 2016 09: 28
    0
    I would be very surprised if Trump wins the election. In light of the development of "American democracy," a woman should be the next president. I am almost sure that there is some kind of "killer" dirt on Trump that will be presented at the last moment and "clear the way" for Clinton.
    Actually, the attack has already begun through his wife, a former fashion model, and a career in this business is rich in very spicy plots.
    But Trump's biggest vulnerability is his business career. He already lost almost everything and was able to "rise" again, for sure he has some "pranks" with taxes - and this is not forgiven in the states.
    Let me remind you that Al Capone did not go to prison for his criminal business, but for not paying taxes on him.
  21. dumpy15
    dumpy15 1 August 2016 09: 56
    +1
    Presidents are not elected, but selected. (C)
  22. uskrabut
    uskrabut 1 August 2016 10: 26
    0
    Of two evils, it is better to choose the lesser. Trump, despite his oddities, is the most adequate of the candidates. Clintonsha is firstly a woman, secondly inadequate, thirdly with a "bad history", fourthly she hates Russia. At this stage, Trump is a better option.
  23. The centurion
    The centurion 1 August 2016 10: 27
    +2
    Quote: Choi
    More than half of Russians (59%) believe that the outcome of the struggle for the presidency of the United States between Republican and Democratic candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton is important for Russia, according to VTsIOM.

    Like it or not, our planet called Earth is like a large prison camp, consisting of many different-sized barracks. At the head of each hut is a hill, the camp is governed by a tillage. He has a common fund (IMF) and a gangway (G7, until the recent past G8). For the most dull, I’ll explain: godfather is the president of the United States, he is the ruler of the world. You need to behave in the camp according to the concepts that the groomsman and godfather establish, otherwise there will be a showdown. If somewhere the punks or fraer are unbelted - offended mounds run to the godfather. He, along with the gangway, arranges a showdown, if necessary, sends for punishment negligent barracks of bulls. When skeptics-opponents tell me that my comparison is vulgar and not correct, I just go down to a lower, accordingly more understandable, level of control. Depending on the specifics, the examples are slightly different. Well, for example, the opponent is a doctor. Then I land an example as follows. In their large hospital there is a head. branch (tubercle). And the head. hospital (godfather) was angry at some doctor and multiplied it by "0". And the head. a branch (hill), without the knowledge of a godfather, took him to him and warmed it. Question. What will happen to this head. department (tubercle), if the godfather knows about it? Hee hee In the best case, both (the doctor and the hillock) will be multiplied by 0, in the worst case, the compartment (hut) will be dismantled and distributed to neighboring huts. The opponent easily agrees with this example, for he knows very well that it will be so, regardless of the sphere of activity and form of ownership. So why do you, dear opponent, think that TAM is different. And you think so because in order to cover up the bare and cynical essence of politics, based, in fact, on the same concepts, beautiful clothes have long been invented: special language, politeness and protocol, which in fact are nothing more than sophisticated varieties ordinary verbiage, bigotry and hypocrisy. Amazing dementia for a competent and experienced person. Well, with grief in half, we figured out the concepts, and the skeptic-opponent seemed to understand everything.
  24. The centurion
    The centurion 1 August 2016 10: 29
    -4
    Quote: Centurion
    Well, with grief in half, we figured out the concepts, and the skeptic-opponent seemed to understand everything.

    Then the control problem:
    1. May 2013. Some kid Snouden annoyed the godfather by running away with a full computer of secret files from the central US hut (where the godfather is also a hillock) to the Gon hut
    2. June 2013. A certain boyar from Ru’s barracks unexpectedly publicly announced that if Po по Snouden submitted an application, he could be sheltered in Ru’s barracks
    3. July 2013. Poz Snouden, on his way from the Gon hut (where the groin bulls started to get him) to the Island hut, stopped in the hallway of Ru hut and wrote a statement.
    4. August 1 2013 Ru’s mound allowed Snouden to shelter in Ru’s hut
    5. August 4 2013 Pahan announced that Ru Barak and his hillock would pay dearly for this and canceled a friendly visit to Ru Barak planned for August 7
    6. November 2013. In the hut Ua next to the barracks Ru, a bouza (maidan) begins with the delivery of the pahan bulls
    7. February 2014. SS "Galicia" division reanimated by the pahana takes the capital of the barracks Ua and takes offensive to the east
    8. Then you yourself know everything ...
    Let's try to answer the inevitable questions:
    1. There is a strong suspicion that Snouden was originally intended for Chin’s barracks, but those of them had the good mind not to peck at this naked hook.
    2. Why was this snouden poz needed in Ru's hut?
    3. Why didn’t the Ru baraka intelligence know what this Poop Snouden knew?
    Yes, for no reason he was not needed. Sheltered Snouden purely out of mischief in order to annoy the groin. But to behave with a godfather is out of concept. This is hooliganism.
    What is the bottom line? Pahan, at point-blank range, does not see Ru’s hillock, doesn’t even ring, drove him out of the gangway, excommunicated him, neighbors enclose Ru’s barracks with barbed wire. One joy, they managed to unfasten the outbuilding Kr at the barracks Ua. Now our VKS have to earn forgiveness, urinating in Syria enemies godfather. But the current godfather, unequivocally, will no longer forgive, not in terms. All hope for the next godfather, but there are few chances. But how to return to the gangway and to the common house, it is generally covered in darkness.
    But anyway, you need to put up with godfather, otherwise they will not give life. And you need to return to the gangway, otherwise they will rule the camp without us. Hedgehog it is clear that you must first of all observe the interests of your hut, but at the same time you need to behave anyway according to concepts, otherwise there will be only enemies around. Without concepts - this is lawlessness. It is impossible to behave in a camp according to the laws of a yard shit, if only because the shit most often ends badly. Either the cops will be tied, or the thieves will sew.
    As you know, proverbs and sayings are a concentrated bunch of philosophy of the past. There is also in our folklore such: “From a penny candle, Moscow burned down.” As they say, neither reduce nor add.
    1. alexej123
      alexej123 1 August 2016 13: 05
      +4
      You in my opinion a little "moved in the barracks at the godfather."
  25. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 1 August 2016 10: 42
    +4
    Quote: rotmistr60
    My soul I understand that from who will become president of the United States, the policy towards Russia will not change, but I really want the Clinton lost.

    Aha "soul" wink I just can't forget the phrase Clintonshe said when she came out of the "durka", where, like, she was undergoing rehabilitation after the scandal with Monica. Then a reporter caught her "on the steps" and asked what she thought about all "this" (meaning the scandal with Monica), whether she forgave her husband and all that, to which Clintonsha replied with a gloomy grin: "What do I think ... I think that all men should be castrated. Seriously. And I will do it .... if I am president ... "
  26. Hlavaty
    Hlavaty 1 August 2016 11: 47
    +2
    With the loss of the Crimea, even as a base for NATO units is uninteresting.


    Well, here the authors are a little carried away. Ukraine is interesting for NATO not only in Crimea.
    If the missiles are located in the Sumy or Chernihiv regions, then their flight time to Moscow is reduced so much that the air defense systems may not have time to intercept them.
    The United States simply will not throw such a potential trump card, but will try to use it somehow. There will still be games.
  27. JonnyT
    JonnyT 1 August 2016 11: 55
    +1
    American elections are a huge show! Trump can promise anything for the presidency. While he trolls the clintosh on Twitter, the tycoons negotiate, divide the markets, develop a GENERAL strategy of action and a plan for 10 years. And their plans have not changed - global superiority in the world, the reason for which is the depletion of the "blood economy" - oil. The Saudis are running out of supplies, and here a tidbit under their noses is the Arctic. In America, all are businessmen. Too much has been invested in the anti-Russian policy to be canceled, so they will continue to press with the stubbornness of a ram, since the advantage is on their side - Russia is in a ring of fire, a big war is coming in Europe, and they sit behind a puddle whole and with a bunch of accumulated reserves, ready "help" the Russians to restore order in Europe and the Middle East (lovingly created by the Americans), instead chopping off the fattest chunk of the Arctic.

    Clintons will come to power with a minimum margin. The show will be truly grand
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 1 August 2016 12: 07
      +1
      Quote: JonnyT
      bigwigs agree, divide markets, develop a GENERAL action strategy and plan for the 10th anniversary

      - a mistake. The "bigwigs" are not at all a single force, there are also different "interest groups"
      - some of these groups support Hillary, others - Trump

      Quote: JonnyT
      Too much has been invested in anti-Russian politics to cancel it, so they will continue to put pressure on the stubbornness of a ram, since Russia has the advantage in the ring of fire, a big war is coming in Europe, and they are sitting behind a puddle whole and with a lot of accumulated reserves

      - mdya ... onolitega, however what

      Here, from a more informed and analysisable source:

      Quote: http://crimsonalter.livejournal.com/91507.html
      Trump is not an angel, not an agent of Putin, not a Russophile, not a sweetheart, and generally quite an unpleasant person. But, if Trump becomes president, then a) neocon projects are being phased out (for example, "Mr. Kagan's Ukraine"), b) in relations between the US and the Russian Federation, as well as the US and the EU, some rationality returns, which is absolutely impossible in the event of coming to power Clinton, c) globalization is slowing down and partially canceled, which is beneficial to both the "isolationists" behind Trump and to us.
      All this has one fat minus. Trump has a real chance to "fix" (in a very painful way, but still fix) the American economy. Clinton will definitely ditch it, but there is another fat minus here: if madmen (in a clinical sense) get to full power in the United States, then the risk of nuclear war becomes too high. Better to let Trump fix the American economy

      And more:

      Quote: http://politrussia.com/world/voryuga-tramp-i-599/
      Comparing Clinton and Trump, one involuntarily recalls Brodsky's lines - "I like a thief than a bloodsucker." The personal capabilities of the American president should not be overestimated due to the shadow system of checks and balances existing in the United States, but the victory of Trump or Clinton will be a clear marker of which of the two coalitions of American elites will have a greater influence on US policy - "thieves" (Trump) or "bloodsuckers. "(Clinton)


      Quote: JonnyT
      Clintonsha will come to power with a minimum margin

      - I wish you hurt ...
      - nothing personal at the same time, believe me yes
  28. Do not care
    Do not care 1 August 2016 14: 58
    0
    The attitude of the Americans towards the upcoming elections is very well shown by the advertisement that was hung in our city:


    "Moving to Canada? We can sell your home.
    Jeff Cook Real Estate ".
  29. Yak28
    Yak28 1 August 2016 15: 44
    +1
    And if an American becomes president of the United States? Negroes should be sent to Africa, whites to go home to Europe, and land should be given to Native Americans, that is, Indians.
  30. vladds
    vladds 1 August 2016 16: 39
    0
    Clinton is better for me, the enemy is immediately visible. And Trump is still a cunning American.
  31. Starik72
    Starik72 1 August 2016 16: 46
    0
    Not a cue so stick, what difference does Trump - Clinton! They’ll come to power, then we’ll judge who is better. And guessing at the coffee grounds, let's provide fortune-tellers.
  32. s.melioxin
    s.melioxin 1 August 2016 17: 47
    0
    Change is coming. And these changes will be quite serious.
    There is no dispute. Either not very bad, or very bad. We haven't adapted much yet. So, that's not news. In the meantime, "sharpen knives." A sharp knife is always helpful. Cut many knots.
  33. jovanni
    jovanni 1 August 2016 18: 37
    +1
    Quote: Freeman
    In light of the development of "American democracy", the next president should be a woman.


    And after her, - a feeder. Well, if America remains. Although they all ...
  34. andrew42
    andrew42 1 August 2016 19: 33
    0
    One single reason that makes me root for Trump: Clintons (forgive me the fair sex) is an inadequate, embittered, feminized woman who obviously does not understand the dangers of a nuclear apocalypse. If only one of her curators foolishly wants to press a button, there is a high probability that Clintons will broadcast the team in hysterics without hesitation. The minimum that can be expected from it is the introduction of a NATO contingent into Ukraine. Such individuals, feeding exclusively on politics, and not on their own built business, do not count the taxpayers' money, they "master" it. So Trump, who is more balanced in his approach to military decisions, is better. The rest of the differences are not critical for us - there is no need to wait for favors either this way or that way.
  35. Forever so
    Forever so 1 August 2016 20: 35
    +1
    "The real commotion among the US military was the words of the Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton regarding her plans for Russia." - a well-known American publication for the military reports.

    After an interview with Fox News, where US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton directly accused Russian intelligence of hacking Democratic party mail servers, some details of personal correspondence were revealed.

    According to Mrs. Clinton, who reached our publication, she intends to defeat Russia as president of the United States, after which paradise will come for all Americans.

    Rumor has it that the presidential candidate literally stated the following:

    “As the president of a great power, I will certainly do my best to defeat Russia as the main threat to the United States, after which each of us will have a big profit - we will sunbathe in the Crimea, splash around in Lake Baikal, barbecue on birch wood, go fishing on Sakhalin. We will swim in oil and gas, breathe the freshest air and absolutely not feel constraints in resources and distance.

    Undoubtedly, this will require some effort, but I can handle it. My team pays great attention to the Russian opposition - the Americans have always fed their "poodles", the most obedient get "fat bones". When we defeat Russia, unfortunately, we will return to the practice of reservations and the historical experience with the Indians is difficult to underestimate here. Everyone in these territories must work for the good of the United States. In the future, our policy will be to completely ban the birth rate of the population of Russia. By the way, the brightest personalities of the Russian opposition already follow our recommendations and refuse to have children, and this cannot but rejoice us. We have many plans for Russia and their implementation will make the United States the only power whose power will subjugate the whole world. "


    The problem is that today these poodles are a little restrained by Putin. Again, no matter who becomes the president of the United States, these poodles remain at the levers of power and finance in Russia. So they will constantly betray and sell the country to the Americans, because for some reason, these poodles are even awarded orders. So, we are not very interested in the elections in America, because our house is hosted by a bunch of corrupt mongrels.
  36. gammipapa
    gammipapa 1 August 2016 21: 49
    0
    The best thing for Russia that promises the arrival of Trump is a change in our liberal hangout in the ruling circles in our country. Our liberals will lose overseas support and funding and most important immunity immunity