Military Review

Russia will create a special fleet for the Arctic from icebreakers and warships

43
In the Russian Federation, the Arctic fleet will be created, which will include icebreakers and warships equipped with modern weapons and capable of operating in the harsh conditions of the Arctic, according to News with reference to the adviser to the general director of the Krylov State Research Center Valery Polovinkin.




"Recent exercises of the Armed Forces on landing on the island of Kotelny in the Arctic with the support of ships of the North fleet showed that even with the support of the icebreaker fleet, ordinary warships cannot operate freely in the Arctic latitudes. The thickness of the sides, even the most modern of them, is not enough to withstand the impact of crushed ice. At the same time, the task is to have a permanent presence in the region ”,
said Polovinkin.

The corresponding task was set by Vladimir Putin, who noted. The adviser also noted that "the Arctic is a region of heightened danger that causes international tension." According to him, the Pentagon has deployed the BGM-109 Tomahawk cruise missiles in this region, which 3 / 4 fires at our territory, which is inaccessible from other directions.

The firstborn of the military icebreaker fleet was “Ilya Muromets” (project 21180), built by order of the Ministry of Defense.

As for the strike ships, their appearance is still under discussion. However, "most likely he will take a lot from the new icebreaker LK-110Ya" Leader "," said Polovinkin.

According to the adviser, the Leader will be equipped with two reactors, which “will provide him with unprecedented power for icebreakers”.
Photos used:
RIA News"
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Roman1970
    Roman1970 29 July 2016 09: 04
    +1

    Russia will create a special fleet for the Arctic from icebreakers and warships
    The Russian icebreaking fleet is currently the largest in the world, you can’t argue. And warships ... As I understand it, icebreakers will do ice wiring for warships.
    1. oleg-gr
      oleg-gr 29 July 2016 09: 07
      +3
      New types of specialized ships will appear purely under the northern latitudes. So a lot of work is to be done (or has already begun) by designers and shipbuilders.
      1. PN
        PN 29 July 2016 09: 29
        +4
        Quote: oleg-gr
        New types of specialized ships will appear purely under the northern latitudes.

        Yeah, the second coming of the armadillos is called for, as the article says: The thickness of the sides, even the most modern of them, is not enough to withstand the impact of crushed ice
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 29 July 2016 09: 12
        +9
        In Ukrainian sites, this news caused a rupture of farts. All the dregs of the rush rushed to discuss the next unrelated harass.
        1. Roman1970
          Roman1970 29 July 2016 09: 30
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          In Ukrainian sites, this news caused a rupture of farts. All the dregs of the rush rushed to discuss the next unrelated harass.

          I'm already used to this ... For example, when the ruble falls - an explosion of joy on the "Censor". I personally do not care about the rate of the Ukrainian national currency. It's the same with icebreakers ...
    3. BARKAS
      BARKAS 29 July 2016 09: 11
      +2
      Quote: Roman1970
      icebreakers will make ice wiring for warships.

      Well it's written right there
      even with the support of the icebreaker fleet, conventional warships cannot operate freely in arctic latitudes. The thickness of the sides, even the most modern of them is not enough
      1. Drzed
        Drzed 29 July 2016 09: 15
        +2
        then you need to do combat icebreakers! soldier
        1. mirag2
          mirag2 29 July 2016 09: 29
          -4
          Let me remind you of an interesting story about the current state and prospects of the Northern Sea Route, watch from 32.45
    4. AlexTires
      AlexTires 29 July 2016 09: 39
      +1
      most likely icebreakers will carry missile and artillery weapons, such as Caliber ...
    5. KCA
      KCA 29 July 2016 09: 46
      -2
      icebreakers, ships and ice class ships all this mr, there are people who serve in the Arctic or live beyond the Arctic Circle, this is the main force, and now no one can defeat it
      1. KCA
        KCA 29 July 2016 09: 50
        0
        Tovarisch Hitler and Mannegraim tried and were blown away, having received on the hill
    6. siberalt
      siberalt 29 July 2016 10: 23
      +3
      China is striving to make a new "silk road" from Asia to Europe, and we need to make our own "northern sea" from Europe to Asia. It is clear that for each km of cargo transshipment, the country through which the transit passes or a share of participation in this receives bonuses. China insists on its share of participation in transit through land in Russia, and at the same time in the "northern sea". It is stupid to even doubt China's economic pragmatism. There will be no "Friendship". But the struggle for the Bereng Strait is only intensifying. And there, not only China and the United States are trying to be in the basics and with their own interests. That is why we need a military icebreaker fleet ahead of the curve. Behind him are grandiose Arctic projects.
    7. Monos
      Monos 29 July 2016 13: 28
      +4
      Quote: Roman1970
      .I understand that icebreakers will do ice wiring for warships.


      Not. The task is to create ice class warships.
  2. RussianRoulette
    RussianRoulette 29 July 2016 09: 05
    +2
    Correctly! We’ll put an iceberg in the ass for the enemies so that the head does not dangle!
    1. volot-voin
      volot-voin 29 July 2016 09: 13
      0
      Quote: RussianRoulette
      Correctly! We’ll put an iceberg in the ass for the enemies so that the head does not dangle!

      The Arctic is the Achilles' Heel of the United States, they have only 2 icebreakers, and aircraft carriers in the Arctic have nothing to do. Pantry of natural resources and the shortest path for ICBMs.
      Well, I told you that on new icebreakers you need the ability to install "Caliber" and I was still minus.

      Maybe the designer and heeded your advice, but we were not informed (and the enemy). This is in the dark ... where calibers and ICBMs can be installed, and this is good.
  3. BARKAS
    BARKAS 29 July 2016 09: 06
    +1
    Well, I told you that on new icebreakers you need the ability to install "Caliber" and I was still minus.
  4. darksoul
    darksoul 29 July 2016 09: 08
    +4
    It’s very clever ..... to build up our strength in a promising region where, thanks to the promptly adopted decisions, we will really become leaders ...
    1. Alexei
      Alexei 29 July 2016 09: 26
      +4
      Quote: darksoul
      It’s very clever ..... to build up our strength in a promising region where, thanks to the promptly adopted decisions, we will really become leaders ...

      Russia has been a leader almost its entire history because it rationally spends the budget on the needs of the population and military-scientific power; some more politicians would live more modestly so that citizens who are far from consumer ambitions would not hold protest marches.
  5. Denis DV
    Denis DV 29 July 2016 09: 13
    -1
    Interestingly, there are rocket icebreakers?
    1. Drzed
      Drzed 29 July 2016 09: 16
      +2
      if not, they will
      1. Winnie76
        Winnie76 29 July 2016 11: 00
        -1
        Quote: DrZed
        Interestingly, there are rocket icebreakers?

        I want a small promising rocket icebreaker.
  6. RUSIVAN
    RUSIVAN 29 July 2016 09: 19
    +1
    Russia will create a special fleet for the Arctic from icebreakers and warships
    For our conditions, a very popular thing ...
  7. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 29 July 2016 09: 21
    +4
    This is called ice-class warships. Previously, there were NO such. Absolutely. During the Second World War, they put artillery on icebreakers, but this is so, to scare polar bears. In general, an ice-class nuclear missile cruiser is difficult. Maybe the "Sharks" were cut in vain? Under the ice everything was secret, they would re-equip them on the "Caliber", there they would enter the mine of 6 pieces, and they could float through any, practically, ice. So, thinking out loud.
    1. xant
      xant 29 July 2016 12: 18
      0
      come on, wail you! we build submarines — and we successfully build to deny, do icebreakers lower like hot cakes and lay down new facts? fact! we are building small displacement ships - we are building, there are problems with 2nd-rank ships (frigates) but they have almost solved them (project 11356, the fact of which is 22350 on the way). We’ll start building 1st-class ships in 2018 - it’s impossible after that as in the 90s, they were almost completely destroyed and cut immediately to take and start building cruisers. the movement has a forward vector, first boats, then corvettes, then frigates, etc. I want it, of course, all at once, but alas, that doesn’t happen.
      But there are problems, they simply cannot but exist, and everything is going on hard, but you have to go through it, otherwise you don’t even have to stutter about sovereignty. This is the price paid for our tacit consent to the destruction of the country in the 90s.
      1. Monarchist
        Monarchist 29 July 2016 16: 04
        0
        Ober-lieutenant, it’s just with frigates 11356 that we have a big ** tsa: GTE were from Ukraine, and now ....
  8. uav80
    uav80 29 July 2016 09: 22
    +9
    And why not immediately build a bay icebreaker, with cannon, missile weapons, etc. ...

    1. Bashibuzuk
      Bashibuzuk 29 July 2016 10: 15
      -1
      Where to use it .... this bay icebreaker?
      Only in the Arctic, scare bears and seals?
      Antarctica, it seems, is considered a demilitarized zone.
      ...
      And this ... bay icebreaker ... how will it shoot? Guidance to carry out.
      During ICE ... or in clear water?
      ...
      Problem ...
    2. g1v2
      g1v2 29 July 2016 13: 03
      +1
      Well, something like this will soon be laid. 2 universal patrol ships of the Arctic zone of the ice class of project 23550 are going to lay in the fall. There is the possibility of installing a module with calibers. hi
    3. seregatara1969
      seregatara1969 30 July 2016 09: 05
      -1
      and who will knock down icicles from a muzzle of a gun? and grease the ship in white
      1. Nosgoth
        Nosgoth 2 August 2016 18: 46
        0
        It looks like someone has a "muzzle" instead of a head
  9. valersvet
    valersvet 29 July 2016 09: 32
    -1
    move the right course, anyway, glad!
  10. Bashibuzuk
    Bashibuzuk 29 July 2016 10: 11
    -1
    In how - ".. And why not immediately build a combat icebreaker, with cannon, rocket weapons, etc. ..."
    ...
    And why, instead of steaming with "baev" icebreakers and other equipment (by the way, I will note that it is still necessary to steam, because ... for the industry) -
    do not immediately install these two nuclear reactors ... or four, damn it ... or eight - on the coast of Novaya Zemlya.
    Install heaters and superchargers there - and let them drive the heated water into the Arctic.
    For 10 years, melt these eternal ice.
    We will arrange zrad for everyone, everyone. Especially reptilian debiloids on the Censor.
    .
    And then, as the Arctic frees itself from ice, the States will drive their aircraft carrier fleet there. We spread rot.
    And we - R-R-R-RAZ ... and turn off the reactors.
    The Arctic is again in the ice, and the entire US fleet embarks on a months-long drift in ice.
    AGAIN again. And again censor reptiloid perineal rupture.
    .....
    Well, this is not an offer.
    1. iskander491
      iskander491 29 July 2016 11: 59
      +1
      then you still need to put in freezers to freeze them in ice, and faster than they can swim out of there, not in 10 years, but in a couple of hours. laughing
    2. Monarchist
      Monarchist 29 July 2016 16: 07
      +2
      Bashibuzuk, did you have a snack today?
      1. Bashibuzuk
        Bashibuzuk 29 July 2016 19: 52
        -1
        Well, here, by 20:00 I bit, finally.
        And what's wrong, Monarchist?
        ...
        With the greatest respect to you, but I think that Russia is quite on the shoulder exactly the operation about which I wrote -
        We continue the Gulf Stream to the Bering Strait.
        The entire Arctic and free of ice.
        But...!!!!!
        BUT...!!!!
        You can tear down the New Earth to hell with your grandmother ... and no reactors are needed.
        This is an irreversible effect. Dangerous.
        On nature
        And it is possible just as I said - additional infrastructure.
        First of all, it’s a bunch of jobs for us ... here and here and everywhere .... a bunch of headaches for ecologists, green, blue and yellow-black ... but whoever harnesses it - heaps of everything!
        In addition - NOBODY did this.
        We could be the first.
        And this is worth a lot.
        A bunch of investments, a minimum of intervention in the NATURE, an unobvious result .... much more interesting and win-win than sending space ships to plow the expanses of the universe. Or the Bolshoi Theater.
        ...
        I think so.
        Now I’ll go ... and have a snack.
      2. Vladimir 1964
        Vladimir 1964 29 July 2016 20: 53
        0
        Quote: Monarchist
        Bashibuzuk, did you have a snack today?

        Vyacheslav, today is Friday! wassat
  11. atamankko
    atamankko 29 July 2016 10: 24
    0
    Our Arctic, and we live there and defend ourselves against enemies.
  12. Dimon19661
    Dimon19661 29 July 2016 11: 42
    0
    Another populist statement. We can’t build a regular fleet of the ocean zone. Shipbuilding programs are constantly being adjusted to increase the delivery time for new orders. Promising ships exist in the form of sketches, performance characteristics, weapons are not agreed with the customer. There is a budget cut. And then we are told another beautiful tale ....
  13. xant
    xant 29 July 2016 11: 55
    0
    all Soviet icebreakers initially provided space for weapons, the weapon itself lies on storage bases (lay), including nothing new here or everything new is well forgotten old! This principle extended even to the civilian fleet in case of war.
  14. iskander491
    iskander491 29 July 2016 11: 56
    0
    Why would icebreakers develop a pair of cargo submarines, and a dozen "Sharks" or "Typhoon" seemed to be called that.
  15. DarkMatter
    DarkMatter 29 July 2016 13: 28
    +1
    The corresponding task was set by Vladimir Putin, who noted. The adviser also noted that


    What is it? One and a half lines and even errors in them, well, copying is no longer possible with normal text or checking laziness before publishing? Minus to the author!
  16. konvalval
    konvalval 29 July 2016 23: 54
    0
    So, we occupy a circular defense.
  17. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 30 July 2016 09: 00
    0
    and can armadillos resist ice? sailors tell me