Military Review

British Prime Minister declared her readiness to use nuclear weapons as a "terrifying force"

126
The newly-minted British Prime Minister Teresa May, while visiting Slovakia, presiding in the EU since 1 July, spoke about her understanding of the need to use nuclear potential. According to Ms. May, she is ready to use nuclear weapon as a “deterrent force”. The Prime Minister gave such an answer to a Slovak journalist who asked a provocative question that sounded as follows: “Is the British Prime Minister ready to use nuclear weapons against Russia?”

RIA News cites the answer to this question of the head of the British Cabinet:
Indeed, last week there was a very important vote in parliament to continue our nuclear program. During the debate, the question was raised whether I would be ready to use nuclear weapons as a deterrent force. And my answer was: "Yes!"


British Prime Minister declared her readiness to use nuclear weapons as a "terrifying force"


Recall that the British parliament had previously voted to modernize its nuclear forces. In particular, it was decided on the structure of the nuclear submarine program fleet Britain. The implementation of this program will cost several tens of billions of pounds.

The "peace-loving" rhetoric of the British authorities attracts attention. The new Cabinet in nuclear weapons sees not a means of parity, but a weapon, the reality of the use of which should be high. In this regard, it is possible to quite accurately speak about what step the "partners" are prepared to take in principle if the Russian nuclear potential has not undergone any recent changes towards modernization.
Photos used:
www.mirror.co.uk
126 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 29 July 2016 07: 23
    +45
    British Prime Minister declared her readiness to use nuclear weapons as a "terrifying force"

    Again, as soon as a woman (you cannot name it otherwise) has seized power, expect trouble and new conflicts. Examples: Albright, K. Rise, H. Clinton, not to mention the President of Estonia and other "doves".
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 29 July 2016 07: 31
      +37
      The use of nuclear force is no longer a deterrence, but a nuclear war. And it’s not a fact who will be obsessed ahead. laughing
      1. Temples
        Temples 29 July 2016 08: 04
        +17
        She herself thinks on Mars something to sit out in this situation?

        Or is she a suicide bomber stabbed by ISIS?
        So that the whole world is in dust.

        I do not remember frank idiots at the helm of the Britons.
        As they say - with the initiative of you islanders!
        You are given the honorary right to be meat in which case)))
        Although what meat there! just ashes ...
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 29 July 2016 08: 18
          +7
          And what does Teresa May, the NEWLY SIZED British Prime Minister, understand - in world nuclear wars she understands ?! crying
          The "bed and skirt" strategist !!! tongue
          1. Dam
            Dam 29 July 2016 09: 00
            +20
            Her appearance is contraceptive, so I would remove the charge of bed expert
            1. Corporal Valera
              Corporal Valera 29 July 2016 10: 34
              +4
              Quote: Damm
              Her appearance is contraceptive, so I would remove the charge of bed expert

              From that the whole world hates. Nedo ... received in due time. Such old women are the most dangerous.
        2. Baloo
          Baloo 29 July 2016 08: 32
          +4
          Or is she a suicide bomber stabbed by ISIS?
          Worse, I suspect that this is a cyborg sent by aliens in order to free the earth from people as a springboard for settlement.
          This old wallet needs to be urgently isolated and forced to be examined in a psychiatric hospital. And make sure that matches are not picked up. laughing
        3. Vita vko
          Vita vko 29 July 2016 09: 19
          +1
          Quote: Temples
          She herself thinks on Mars something to sit out in this situation?

          You're right! That is exactly what the piles of cynical financial bigwigs think, which bring such crazy people to power through their hand-held media holdings.
          1. ARES623
            ARES623 29 July 2016 21: 18
            0
            Quote: Vita VKO

            You're right! That is exactly what the piles of cynical financial bigwigs think, which bring such crazy people to power through their hand-held media holdings.

            Therefore, it is imperative to have a clear understanding of the whereabouts of such characters, their relatives and fixed assets. These objects should be potential targets of our nuclear triad.
        4. Ezhaak
          Ezhaak 29 July 2016 09: 43
          +2
          Quote: Temples
          I do not remember frank idiots at the helm of the Britons.

          Now there will be something to remember. Very smart Theresa May! am
        5. NIKNN
          NIKNN 29 July 2016 10: 06
          +6
          This is what the UN should think about and not consider bubbles with detergent.
          I would have worn such applicants a bracelet on which the seeker is pointing ...
        6. Skubudu
          Skubudu 29 July 2016 12: 04
          -1
          The words of this with ... and are a good occasion, in which case, preventively incinerate, finally, this island.
        7. Lord_Bran
          Lord_Bran 29 July 2016 13: 00
          +1
          Populism. But the woman was beaten off tightly. Bad start to the premiership.
          1. Vasyan1971
            Vasyan1971 29 July 2016 19: 54
            0
            Quote: Lord_Bran
            Populism. But the woman was beaten off tightly. Bad start to the premiership.

            She is not to blame! Beads press on the brains. request
        8. BMP-2
          BMP-2 29 July 2016 21: 51
          +1
          I don’t understand why she needs nuclear weapons for intimidation? request
          In my opinion, she is already quite scary ... laughing
      2. Bayonet
        Bayonet 29 July 2016 08: 12
        0
        Quote: siberalt
        The use of nuclear force is no longer a deterrence, but a nuclear war.

        Nuclear weapons can be a frightening force only before they are used. It is the terrifying power of nuclear weapons that allows you to cool hotheads, prevent global wars and ensure the security of your country. This applies to all countries with nuclear weapons, including Russia. So the "yes" of Theresa May does not at all mean a desire to fight with Russia. And how the media (especially the yellow press) can turn everything upside down is known to all reasonable people. hi
        1. kotvov
          kotvov 29 July 2016 11: 05
          0
          And how can the media (especially the yellow press) turn everything upside down?
          Alexander, and what does the press have to do with possession of nuclear weapons? It means the use in cases of threat to the country (by default), and the application for use is clearly regarded as a threat of use.
          1. Bayonet
            Bayonet 29 July 2016 16: 17
            0
            Quote: kotvov
            possession of nuclear weapons means use in cases of threat to the country (by default) and a statement of use is clearly regarded as a threat of use.

            It follows from your logic that we (as owners of nuclear weapons) also threaten everyone? All the same, there is a new difference between intimidation and the threat of use?
      3. Baloo
        Baloo 29 July 2016 08: 29
        +9
        According to Ms. May, she is ready to use nuclear weapons as a “deterrent”
        Senile dementia is not doing well.
        Shaving, call a psychiatrist. This Madame has little idea of ​​the consequences for London of just one warhead from any of our missiles. Shaving, think. fool Your islet is one big target. Around water. There will be nowhere to hide. No filters and bomb shelters will save anyone. This old galosh was time for a churchyard, no matter how she brought everyone there. laughing
      4. guzik007
        guzik007 29 July 2016 08: 54
        +3
        Oops on! Somewhere I already saw similar beads, complete with a similar level of intelligence.
        Granny, do you at least understand what will happen to your lovely lawns after such "intimidation" of Russia?
      5. Hyppopotut
        Hyppopotut 29 July 2016 09: 00
        +4
        A woman with a nuclear weapon is more dangerous than a monkey with a grenade am
        1. The comment was deleted.
      6. Vend
        Vend 29 July 2016 10: 03
        +1
        Quote: siberalt
        The use of nuclear force is no longer a deterrence, but a nuclear war. And it’s not a fact who will be obsessed ahead. laughing

        Apparently the aunt completely moved the mind.
    3. RussianRoulette
      RussianRoulette 29 July 2016 07: 33
      +12
      That's what the pattern is ... as soon as the menopause looms on the horizon, these madamis rise to such posts and then begin to turn up!
    4. shibi
      shibi 29 July 2016 07: 36
      +17
      the woman does not understand that Great Britain can immediately turn into the "Island of Bad Luck" - a desolate scorched piece of land in the ocean, called the United Kingdom ...
      1. sgazeev
        sgazeev 29 July 2016 07: 46
        +2
        Quote: sibi
        the woman does not understand that Great Britain can immediately turn into the "Island of Bad Luck" - a desolate scorched piece of land in the ocean, called the United Kingdom ...

        It will simply be called "NO", if humanity survives, then in years with many zeros, archaeologists will find these islands on the fragments from bottles of gin and Scotch whiskey. lol
      2. go21zd45few
        go21zd45few 29 July 2016 08: 17
        0
        God did not give the mind, consider a cripple. Well, if at least something remains on the surface, the possibility of complete immersion is not excluded.
    5. sgazeev
      sgazeev 29 July 2016 07: 42
      +6
      Quote: rotmistr60
      British Prime Minister declared her readiness to use nuclear weapons as a "terrifying force"

      Again, as soon as a woman (you cannot name it otherwise) has seized power, expect trouble and new conflicts. Examples: Albright, K. Rise, H. Clinton, not to mention the President of Estonia and other "doves".
    6. Lyton
      Lyton 29 July 2016 07: 47
      +5
      This nonsense should be reduced to an excursion to Chernobyl, Thatcher’s laurels do not give rest, the same erysipelas as that of that one.
    7. Pavel1
      Pavel1 29 July 2016 08: 16
      +2
      a stupid idiot forgets that one Voivode erases half of this same Britain, so politicians who have completely lost touch with reality can say such nonsense about nuclear strikes.
      1. Amurets
        Amurets 29 July 2016 08: 29
        +3
        Quote: Paul1
        a stupid idiot forgets that one Voivode erases half of this same Britain, so politicians who have completely lost touch with reality can say such nonsense about nuclear strikes.

        Half of this Britain can be erased without nuclear weapons, by voting for the withdrawal of Great Britain from Scotland and Northern Ireland, and then Theresa May will have to hide her nuclear forces under her skirt.
      2. Vadim237
        Vadim237 29 July 2016 08: 58
        0
        So she will now build her missile defense system in the UK.
      3. madjik
        madjik 29 July 2016 09: 24
        0
        need five pieces for 100%
      4. Baby doll
        Baby doll 29 July 2016 10: 27
        +3
        Quote: Paul1
        one Voivode erases half of this same Britain

        Several decades ago, our experts (I will call them that) have already conducted similar studies with the simulation of nuclear strikes against the UK in various ways. The results showed that even two megaton-class nuclear warheads detonated on opposite sides of their island with a gap for a certain period of time cause disastrous consequences. With the results of research, the British were introduced at the next aggravation of relations with us. After that, the relationship became somewhat warmer.
        Apparently, the newly made prime minister (ruff), it is necessary to recall in a popular form the results of our research.
    8. INVESTOR
      INVESTOR 29 July 2016 08: 54
      0
      Put the thing in the microwave and fry it prelude for such a bazaar.
    9. Ezhaak
      Ezhaak 29 July 2016 09: 57
      0
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Examples: Albright, K. Rise, H. Clinton, not to mention the President of Estonia and other "doves"

      You frankly forgot, and maybe you have no idea about Gold Meir. I remind you !.
      One phrase from Golda Meir:
      Israel does not have nuclear weapons, but if necessary, Israel will use it.
      “There is only one man in the government, and that one is a woman named Golda!”
    10. marlin1203
      marlin1203 29 July 2016 11: 19
      0
      The beads are crushing her brain! ..
    11. I am human
      I am human 29 July 2016 11: 59
      0
      Scared a hedgehog with a bare ass! Another fool has appeared ... Madame, your little Britain will be washed off the face of the Earth by one vigorous bomb! It would be better if she was silent, maybe then she would have passed for the clever!
      1. yes don't care
        yes don't care 29 July 2016 12: 14
        +1
        something like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BW2_on_X8-0
    12. Ivan65
      Ivan65 29 July 2016 12: 29
      0
      If she, in order to intimidate Russia, throws a vigorous bomb on Ukraine, then I strongly disagree, why should our smaller foolish brothers be exterminated?
      We will of course be frightened .... and with fright the bomb bay will twitch and the dad of all the bombs will "accidentally" fly to the British Isles ..... That's where the history of these islands will end .... Don't frighten Russia - the bear understands the joke inadequately .. ..
      1. Kasym
        Kasym 29 July 2016 18: 22
        0
        I thought she was smarter.
        Britain's nuclear weapons are probably the "weakest" of the recognized nuclear powers. US carriers, placement only on nuclear submarines, out of 4 nuclear submarines, only one is at sea. "For intimidation," I would say for containment and parity - it would look smarter. hi
    13. Berkut752
      Berkut752 9 August 2016 16: 06
      0
      I noticed why, by the middle of life, many women turn into dull-eyed, oh cows?
  2. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr 29 July 2016 07: 23
    +4
    Whom is this newly-made "iron lady" going to intimidate? Is the level of Russophobia so off scale? "Aircraft Carrier UK" will be completely erased on occasion. And the Americans won't help.
    1. Pacifist
      Pacifist 29 July 2016 07: 34
      +11
      She, I think, needs to be conveyed a simple thought, unsinkable aircraft carriers do not exist, the only question is the power of the charge. For the UK, as a state with barking menopause, 500KT is enough to cease to exist ... i.e. 1-2 rockets. So let him draw conclusions.
      1. VSZMK
        VSZMK 29 July 2016 07: 47
        0
        I feel sorry for Scotland!
      2. saturn.mmm
        saturn.mmm 29 July 2016 07: 49
        +5
        Quote: Pacifist
        For the UK, as a state with barking menopause, 500KT is enough to cease to exist ... i.e. 1-2 rockets. So let him draw conclusions

        In one "Voevoda" 10x750 Kt.
        1. Pacifist
          Pacifist 29 July 2016 08: 00
          +3
          No, well, why so tough and expensive ... now the times are not the same, you have to be more economical bully
      3. Corsair
        Corsair 29 July 2016 10: 05
        0
        Quote: Pacifist
        500KT is enough to cease to exist ... i.e. 1-2 rockets. So let him draw conclusions.

        If for the prime minister - then one bullet is enough, if for Small Britain - then 500 kt is clearly not enough, so I sketched about 8 Poplars of 800 kt and that will be not enough, at least 10-15, not taking into account Ireland and Scotland, although partially You’ll have to hook the last one.
        http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/?t=b34293b6d821f7f787bfdefa135d07c4
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 29 July 2016 07: 35
      +4
      Quote: oleg-gr
      Is the level of Russophobia so off-scale?

      And what is imperceptible?
      Conclusion - whoever in the USA or England, Poland, Germany does not become the head of state, he will be even more paranoid than his predecessor.
      1. fact checker
        fact checker 29 July 2016 08: 04
        .
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Is the level of Russophobia so off-scale?

        And what is imperceptible?
        Conclusion - whoever in the USA or England, Poland, Germany does not become the head of state, he will be even more paranoid than his predecessor.

        romances, get together and try to figure out why the woman is paranoid, and the one dude who, in which case promised to deploy nuclear weapons in the Crimea, isn’t?
        1. Amurets
          Amurets 29 July 2016 08: 32
          +5
          Quote: fact checker

          romances, get together and try to figure out why the woman is paranoid, and the one dude who, in which case promised to deploy nuclear weapons in the Crimea, isn’t?

          Are you talking about whom? About Obama or Yushchenko?
          1. fact checker
            fact checker 29 July 2016 09: 15
            -4
            Quote: Amurets

            Are you talking about whom? About Obama or Yushchenko?

            About Obama, of course! He promised to place this in Crimea, forgot?
            1. Krasniy_lis
              Krasniy_lis 29 July 2016 10: 14
              +1
              Quote: fact checker
              He promised to place this in Crimea,

              No, not forgotten. They planned a military base in Crimea.
              They have long wanted to remove the Russian fleet from there.
        2. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 29 July 2016 08: 36
          +3
          Quote: fact checker
          romances, get together and try to figure out why the woman is paranoid, and the one dude who, in which case promised to deploy nuclear weapons in the Crimea, isn’t?

          To whom to explain, troll on the English flag. Scha admin will come, but in the ban you fly away, there’s still time to spend on you.
          Hello to the Queen.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. fact checker
            fact checker 29 July 2016 09: 17
            -6
            Quote: Alexander Romanov

            To whom to explain, troll on the English flag.

            And three comments, what would once again not look like a fool? lol
          3. fact checker
            fact checker 29 July 2016 09: 17
            -3
            Quote: Alexander Romanov

            To whom to explain, troll on the English flag.

            And three comments, what would once again not look like a fool? lol
  3. Yegorchik
    Yegorchik 29 July 2016 07: 24
    +3
    The intimidator will be broken, along with the island.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 29 July 2016 07: 36
      0
      Quote: Egorchik
      The intimidator will be broken, along with the island.

      We will no longer know what will happen to the island, there will be no connection. Yes, and no one will be interested.
  4. Oml
    Oml 29 July 2016 07: 24
    +3
    Another Anglo-Saxon for the whole head.
    1. Turkir
      Turkir 29 July 2016 10: 50
      0
      Is it really Anglo-Saxon? repeat
      1. I am human
        I am human 29 July 2016 12: 04
        0
        Insolent Saxon ...
        1. Turkir
          Turkir 29 July 2016 14: 32
          0
          May is a German surname. Teresa May, daughter of a Protestant vicar. He died in a car accident. But the name of the mother for some reason is not mentioned anywhere.
  5. viktor561
    viktor561 29 July 2016 07: 28
    0
    Woman at the nuclear button - that a monkey with a grenade - you do not know who will blow up!
  6. V.ic
    V.ic 29 July 2016 07: 28
    0
    We will not touch Ireland and Scotland, Wales too. But in England, a couple of "toys" megatons of 20 = just right! Frogs eat radioactive ash, they also need it.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 29 July 2016 07: 37
      +7
      Quote: V.ic
      Ireland and Scotland are not the throne, Wales, too. AND

      Sorry, you are so humane, but where is the fleet of the British Navy based?
      1. sgazeev
        sgazeev 29 July 2016 07: 50
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: V.ic
        Ireland and Scotland are not the throne, Wales, too. AND

        Sorry, you are so humane, but where is the fleet of the British Navy based?

        It would not hurt to walk lightly through the Bahamas, Falklands, Gibraltar and many large and small bases.
      2. Amurets
        Amurets 29 July 2016 08: 41
        0
        Quote: Alexander Romanov

        Sorry, you are so humane, but where is the fleet of the British Navy based?

        And the fleet can be handed out to the needy! Wales, Ireland, Iceland, Falklands.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 29 July 2016 08: 54
          0
          Quote: Amurets
          Wales, Ireland, Iceland, Falklands.

          And which of the listed in the case of warriors will be on the side of Russia?
          1. Amurets
            Amurets 29 July 2016 10: 53
            0
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            And which of the listed in the case of warriors will be on the side of Russia?

            I don’t remember who spoke, but to seek reluctance, in order to defend Romania we need ten divisions and ten divisions too. So it’s better to be neutral. We won’t have a headache. Let’s deal with the English gift ourselves. We the measurement systems are different. Yes, and while the fleet is divided, it can be changed, we will also be calmer.
    2. dauria
      dauria 29 July 2016 07: 51
      +17
      Ireland and Scotland are not the throne, Wales, too.


      "When will I sort them? I'll go to work tomorrow ..".
      1. Amurets
        Amurets 29 July 2016 08: 35
        +2
        Quote: dauria
        "When will I sort them? I'll go to work tomorrow ..".

        A bunch of pluses! You can’t say better.
  7. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 29 July 2016 07: 29
    +3
    It won't work out on the island, it will wash off in a wave. And therefore, do not scratch your tongue, not on a bench near the house ...
  8. engineering
    engineering 29 July 2016 07: 34
    +1
    Foreign speakers have some kind of pathological hatred of Russia and everything Russian. True then Alexander III said
    More than a hundred years ago, the Russian sovereign Alexander the Third said: Russia has no friends, they are afraid of our vastness ... Russia has only two reliable allies - its army and its fleet.

    They fear their own people about the bad Russians who need to be destroyed, otherwise they will destroy them, while realizing that there will be no winners in this war and for mankind the use of nuclear weapons will be the last war, since there will be nothing living on our planet Earth will be gone.
    1. I am human
      I am human 29 July 2016 12: 07
      0
      Just Russia will remain, but the rest will not be lucky
  9. demiurg
    demiurg 29 July 2016 07: 34
    0
    No, that's right, let it scare. As an act of intimidation, first a couple of missiles in Wales, then a couple of missiles in Poland. And only then make a sharp statement on TV to Russia :))
  10. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 29 July 2016 07: 35
    +3
    And this one has beads on its neck !!! Something is unclean here! fool
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 29 July 2016 09: 02
      +1
      This is a control collar of communication with Washington.
  11. Million
    Million 29 July 2016 07: 36
    +3
    Woman fool! She should not be the prime minister, but trade flowers
  12. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff 29 July 2016 07: 36
    +3
    Beside her, the howitzer burns, she runs the pampers to change. For some reason, I'm sure she's in diapers. Otherwise, such speeches are not spoken.
  13. sergeyzzz
    sergeyzzz 29 July 2016 07: 40
    +3
    In my opinion, it’s enough to print her scary face in close-up and hang up a nuclear bomb on every corner wassat
  14. Flinky
    Flinky 29 July 2016 07: 40
    +1
    Fine. Let them see in Matrasna what a woman is at a nuclear button. And draw conclusions.
  15. solovey
    solovey 29 July 2016 07: 45
    0
    The Robinsons don't think about their "unsinkable" aircraft carrier!
  16. Wolka
    Wolka 29 July 2016 07: 48
    +1
    in a word, a crazy aunt, but the psychiatric hospital is not yet ready for ...
  17. BOB044
    BOB044 29 July 2016 07: 49
    +1
    Indeed, last week there was a very important vote in parliament to continue our nuclear program. During the debate, the question was raised whether I would be ready to use nuclear weapons as a deterrent force. And my answer was: "Yes!"
    This woman does not even understand that the whole world will turn into ashes. And the island where she lives then will be the first in this firebox.
  18. dsm100
    dsm100 29 July 2016 07: 52
    +4
    Forgive me colleagues if that, but a woman at the helm of the state .... This is an ass.
  19. Ivanovich-1
    Ivanovich-1 29 July 2016 07: 53
    +2
    Let him shove himself in the fray and burn!
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 29 July 2016 08: 44
      0
      Quote: Ivanovich-1
      Let him shove himself in the fray and burn!

      Well, you and the beast? Come up with this?
  20. HAM
    HAM 29 July 2016 08: 01
    +2
    "The woman with the scythe", and now this "straw widow" is threatened with nuclear weapons. And what will happen when Killary - "beat Bill" gets to power? They don't think about their heads at all ...
    1. pafegosoff
      pafegosoff 29 July 2016 08: 09
      +2
      As for Clinton, I agree. President with a bonboy. This is a monkey with a grenade.
  21. 29261
    29261 29 July 2016 08: 01
    +1
    Oh, you fool !!! Is she seriously expecting to sit out on her island or has she seen enough of the "Highlander"? with a pork snout in a Kalashny row.
  22. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 29 July 2016 08: 03
    +2
    Scotland and Northern Ireland urgently need to "scratch" from Britain. And then an explosive wave of glass increases am
    Babs after a certain age should not be allowed to come to power - they are not emotionally stable. So far, nothing particularly good from their "leadership" has been observed. And the Anglo-Saxons are in a hurry to hand over the nuclear suitcase to the Clintons. These two ... For a couple the whole world in "dust"?
  23. darksoul
    darksoul 29 July 2016 08: 06
    +3
    it would be better to do Brexit du.ra ........ God forbid Hilary still draws ...
  24. nikolaj1703
    nikolaj1703 29 July 2016 08: 07
    +12
    She would need to learn from her predecessor! You need to be friends with your head!
    1. fact checker
      fact checker 29 July 2016 08: 23
      -4
      Quote: nikolaj1703
      She would need to learn from her predecessor! You need to be friends with your head!
  25. Valkh
    Valkh 29 July 2016 08: 18
    0
    Quote: rotmistr60
    British Prime Minister declared her readiness to use nuclear weapons as a "terrifying force"

    Again, as soon as a woman (you cannot name it otherwise) has seized power, expect trouble and new conflicts. Examples: Albright, K. Rise, H. Clinton, not to mention the President of Estonia and other "doves".

    Yes, already))) forgot another lesbian - Frau Schmerkel)))
  26. gg.na
    gg.na 29 July 2016 08: 18
    0
    British Prime Minister declared her readiness to use nuclear weapons as a "terrifying force"

    Is sarapotie che what started at the woman belay ... it looks like the Chess has begun! fool I wanted to try something ??! Well then, a flag in her ... kidney repeat and drum on the neck let him try lol ... I’m also wondering what will come of it !!! She is, however, a girl and girls love how to try passion wassat !! Gee-gee-gygygygygygyyyy !!!!! laughing
  27. Arkan
    Arkan 29 July 2016 08: 24
    +2
    Are the Anglo-Saxons ready and not to be afraid of retaliation? We are also ready, should something happen, to iron their island with our nuclear weapons. If they hope for help from the United States, then the Americans have always lived according to the principle of "your shirt is closer to your body."
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 29 July 2016 09: 06
      -1
      If they are the first to attack, then the European part of Russia will cover 300 warheads, in just 6 - 8 minutes.
      1. kotvov
        kotvov 29 July 2016 11: 15
        0
        If they are the first to attack, then the European part of Russia will be covered by 300 warheads, in just 6-8 minutes. ,,
        and what? even without the use of nuclear weapons by Russia, they will not live long. And then, this can not be called life.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 29 July 2016 20: 28
          0
          "Even without the use of nuclear weapons by Russia, they will not live long." - Why?
  28. romandostalo
    romandostalo 29 July 2016 08: 26
    +1
    Lord What is going on in the world? Just some kind of parade of mediocrity, mediocrity and just idiots ...
  29. Waroc
    Waroc 29 July 2016 08: 41
    0
    Damn, how fearless they all are. This witch did not think that after such words (and to be honest, initially, without any statements), Russia is also ready to use nuclear weapons against Britain, and it will remain even in the USA and all the other mongrels.
  30. Grach710
    Grach710 29 July 2016 08: 52
    +1
    She’s an idiot. She’s just an illiterate fool. Would she see how a nuclear charge explodes at the test site, at least a stand charge-full pants would be. Nuclear weapons are used 1 time - the first and last, then there will be no one to frighten. "Iron Lady" - ugh, idiot hi
  31. mitya24
    mitya24 29 July 2016 09: 00
    0
    Dumb rat
  32. Kudrevkn
    Kudrevkn 29 July 2016 09: 01
    0
    "Mishka, let's go beat the Jews! And what are they for? So the Jews! What if they roll over to us? And what for us?" (Joke). The English lady taught geography poorly at school, since she "admits the possibility of using nuclear weapons against ... North Korea and Russia" !? The reciprocal "roll-off" will cover the British Isles (and not only) with the ocean, connecting the Atlantic and the Arctic! And that these Anglo-Saxon young ladies in their porcelain heads (and Clinton too?) - see the cockroaches scattered, and the cuckoo died?
  33. grandfather Mih
    grandfather Mih 29 July 2016 09: 06
    0
    One of the herds. Previously, cow rabies was attributed to rabies, now it’s like that. Evolution, however.
  34. Shamsik
    Shamsik 29 July 2016 09: 16
    0
    - Teresa May, and then who will collect your guts?
  35. wandlitz
    wandlitz 29 July 2016 09: 24
    0
    During the debate, the question was raised whether I would be ready to use nuclear weapons as a deterrent. And my answer was "Yes!"
    I would have thought at the beginning what she would get in return.
    Or still thinks that our missiles will not reach her island?
  36. RUSIVAN
    RUSIVAN 29 July 2016 09: 25
    +2
    British Prime Minister declared her readiness to use nuclear weapons as a "terrifying force"
    Oh, these "warriors" ...
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 29 July 2016 09: 56
      -3
      Quote: RUSIVAN
      British Prime Minister declared her readiness to use nuclear weapons as a "terrifying force"

      If a warning sign "Do not climb - it will kill!" Was hung on the pole, this does not mean that they are going to kill you. You are being held back from a rash act.
      1. Bayonet
        Bayonet 29 July 2016 12: 58
        +1
        If you do not see the difference between intimidation and actual use, then this is your misfortune and those who taught you. hi
        1. Lekov L
          Lekov L 29 July 2016 14: 09
          0
          Alexander, remember!
          In our country, inadvertent intimidation by nonadvertances (especially any sheluponi - forgive my French) is perceived as an insult.
          In the evening, some small drunken migrant worker will get to your place on the street with claims that Central Asia is the whole of Russia and you personally will start to put your knee-elbow right here and now.
          How do you react?
          I took this miracle for the left ear in the last time, unfolded it, bent it, and gave such a kick in the tailbone that my wife wondered if she would call the ambulance. laughing
          So most here also react. And rightly so.
          And this lady answered Lavrov. Diplomatic. "D ... ... t" (s).
          With respect to you, but not to this d ...
        2. Gas truck
          Gas truck 29 July 2016 14: 49
          0
          do you remove teeth through the anus? it’s not the details, the result is the same, right?
  37. madjik
    madjik 29 July 2016 09: 27
    0
    Quote: Paul1
    a stupid idiot forgets that one Voivode erases half of this same Britain, so politicians who have completely lost touch with reality can say such nonsense about nuclear strikes.
    need five pieces for 100%
  38. then
    then 29 July 2016 09: 29
    0
    I am ready to use nuclear weapons as a deterrent

    She said it was scary to herself that she was so fearless.
  39. sergo1914
    sergo1914 29 July 2016 09: 44
    0
    We are less aggressive. We can frighten the Pskov Airborne Division. Or Marines. The result is the same (uninhabited area with individual aborigines pissing in pants from any sound), but without radioactive infection.
  40. sinoptic
    sinoptic 29 July 2016 09: 45
    0
    ... I'm ready to use nuclear weapons as a deterrent

    Lord!
    Recent British premieres are a complete failure of British psychiatry!

    Interestingly, they are tested by a psychiatrist before they get access to the nuclear button?
    1. Krasniy_lis
      Krasniy_lis 29 July 2016 10: 18
      0
      beads seen in the photo? Coincidence? I don’t think so. (WITH)
      laughing
  41. weksha50
    weksha50 29 July 2016 10: 17
    0
    "Noteworthy is the "peace-loving" rhetoric of the British authorities"...

    A "good" link will be with Clintonikha if she wins the US elections ...
    While the Europeans overseas men are homosexual, women (sorry) are in full swing towards power, moreover, in the forceful sense ... Defense Ministers, Prime Ministers, Presidents, Chancellors ...

    And all, as one, for some reason, they vehemently hate Russia ...
    Some anti-Russian matriarchy in the Western countries is coming ...
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 29 July 2016 10: 57
      +1
      Quote: weksha50

      And all, as one, for some reason, they vehemently hate Russia ...
      Some anti-Russian matriarchy in the Western countries is coming ...

      And because the Euro-men did not fulfill what the Eurobabs needed.
  42. atamankko
    atamankko 29 July 2016 10: 37
    0
    Disease of growth, grow wiser.
  43. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 29 July 2016 10: 41
    -1
    A dozen deep-sea autonomous nuclear torpedoes will multiply the vile island by zero. For a long time it was necessary to demolish this dirty trick from the face of the planet - small Britain - a breeding ground for the infamous arrogant Saxons and Jews. But once you have to start. As long as at least one Anglo-Saxon is alive, there will be no rest for Russians. This must be understood, realized and acted upon in accordance with this attitude. If a war suddenly happens - the survivors in the Nagul must envy the dead.
  44. unsinkable
    unsinkable 29 July 2016 11: 45
    -1
    I'd like to do as in distant childhood. * Who are you scaring? AND KINKING between the eyes. fool angry
  45. Chaos
    Chaos 29 July 2016 13: 22
    0
    The old club had lost his temper. He will say that in two hundred years they will search for Atlantis, which has inexplicably disappeared somewhere very quickly)))
  46. Mykl
    Mykl 29 July 2016 14: 12
    0
    So Mrs. Thatcher once showed that from the geography of the British Isles, in which case there will be only a little chemistry and physics (one very specific section)? So it is necessary to introduce this old woman in the course. Show, mean.
  47. Disorder
    Disorder 29 July 2016 14: 42
    0
    Indeed, last week there was a very important vote in parliament to continue our nuclear program. During the debate, the question was raised whether I would be ready to use nuclear weapons as a deterrent force. And my answer was: "Yes!"

    It turns out that now England will behave like the DPRK?
  48. Yuri11076
    Yuri11076 29 July 2016 15: 06
    0
    Here is a fool, in this case from Britain there will be a piece of sushi consisting of melted glass mixed with the British.
  49. Watchdog
    Watchdog 29 July 2016 15: 21
    0
    Yes, it is not difficult to throw a show-off in front of your parliament after appointment. I would say even understandable. But suddenly you will have to answer for this rotten market (God forbid!) ... This is not the language of revenge, but you are responsible for the fact that the territory of Great Britain, after such a "demonstration" misunderstood by the Russian Federation, can turn into nuclear ashes in one fell swoop. And no one will climb to defend! Who needs it - to be responsible for the idiots who staged a nuclear provocation, and who got it in full? Nobody.
  50. Air Force Colonel
    Air Force Colonel 29 July 2016 19: 09
    0
    The next climatic and unsatisfied ... he waves his dry head.
    Waiting for trouble from these clits ...