OTRK "Iskander-M" in ZVO work out the destruction of the command points of the conditional enemy

66
The rocket brigade of the Western Military District, equipped with Iskander-M operational-tactical missile systems, began the planned field exercises. According to the press service of the ZVO, the events will be held at the site located in the Leningrad region.

It is reported that in the framework of training activities, combat calculations will perform both single and group rocket attacks. At the same time, attention is focused on the fact that actual rocket launches will not be carried out. Instead, an imitation of attacks by command posts and a radar of a conditional enemy located at a distance of several hundred kilometers from the location of the Iskander-M OTRK will be carried out.

OTRK "Iskander-M" in ZVO work out the destruction of the command points of the conditional enemy


Press Service ZVO:
The rocketmen carry out a set of activities for the preparation and removal of equipment from the park in conditions of full blackout and radio silence, work out the actions when making a march over rough terrain bypassing public roads and taking a starting position. About 100 military personnel take part in the classes and more than 50 units of combat and special equipment are involved.


Training activities in the Leningrad region once again provoked a strong reaction from the Baltic neighbors. Despite the fact that rocket launches will not be made on the fact, the “counter threat” option is already being discussed in the Baltic mass media.

Today in Estonia it turned out that the threat comes not only from “Russia”, but also from ISIS. An unknown person called the security police and, stating his involvement in ISIS, said that he planned to seize one of the planes flying to Germany at the Tallinn airport this week. Security measures at the airport of the Estonian capital strengthened. Reports about it postimees.ee.



Looking at this photo, it is not entirely clear what exactly the photographer tried to focus on: “reinforcement” in the form of three policemen with a dog or ... well, you understand ...

Recently, in the Baltics, another survey was conducted on where the threats to the security of the region come from. The majority of respondents in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia (about 62%) stated that international terrorism poses the greatest danger. The "Russian threat", despite all the tricks of NATO, in the Baltics "see" no more than 20% of the population.
  • http://function.mil.ru/, http://rus.postimees.ee
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +40
    25 July 2016 16: 42
    They have mice eating bread in the kitchen, and they are all afraid of the bear, who sleeps for a thousand km in the den.
    1. +18
      25 July 2016 16: 58
      I went to visit a friend in the country house (Kingisepp district, Leningrad region). I don’t understand the mind, in a few kilometers there are NATO units (Estonia). And these hypocrites are still talking about the Russian threat!
      1. +8
        25 July 2016 17: 03
        It is necessary there often to conduct such exercises let them get used.
        1. +2
          25 July 2016 17: 22
          Quote: BARKAS
          It’s necessary to conduct such exercises there more often let them get used.

          Yes, everything is useless
          not only “from Russia”, but also from ISIS

          if earlier I advised them to build bunkers and bunkers every 500m according to the Albanian method, now that’s all - they will build bunkers, and their igilovites will take, a bag of chesslovo - it's time for them to hang themselves
          1. +6
            25 July 2016 17: 45
            Quote: Lord of the Sith
            They have mice eating bread in the kitchen, and they are all afraid of the bear, who sleeps for a thousand km in the den.


            NATO wants a lot of money, they will shake the budgets of all countries that are afraid of Russia.
            1. +3
              25 July 2016 21: 36
              Quote: cniza
              NATO wants a lot of money, budgets of all countries will shake

              ... wouldn’t have torn ... won the European Union already -1 ... wink
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. Dam
          0
          25 July 2016 21: 30
          The main purpose of such exercises, so that at hour H, the enemies would not even say meow
      2. 0
        26 July 2016 03: 50
        Yes, these Baltic states even with anyone, even with the devil - if only not with the Russians ...
    2. +11
      25 July 2016 17: 17
      The author of the photo, like me, appreciates everything beautiful in a woman, police officers with a dog act as a background wink, background, so to speak, which depicts a beautiful female ass. My respect to the photographer for understanding the priorities of art smile .
    3. +3
      25 July 2016 18: 34
      And who is not afraid of a bear?
      Afraid to mean respected for strength and power.
      And Russia has no right not to be strong. There are enough jackals around us who need our natural resources.

      Let them know, they’ll get it, enough to death!
    4. +2
      25 July 2016 19: 47
      Quote: .....
      Training events in the Leningrad Region once again provoked a stormy reaction among the Baltic neighbors.

      “The majority of those polled in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia (about 62%) stated that the greatest danger is international terrorism.” So all the same, a violent reaction from 20% of the Baltic neighbors? For these, we conduct exercises against ISIS
    5. 0
      25 July 2016 20: 04
      It’s far from Tallinn. The bear does not provide navigation. And nefig angry
  2. +4
    25 July 2016 16: 50
    But where does the threat come from if it doesn’t exist in fact? .. On the other hand, there are more such exercises, and the West will go bankrupt on pseudo-counteraction.
  3. +14
    25 July 2016 16: 51
    Not more than 20% of the population "sees" the "Russian threat" in the Baltics, despite all the tricks of NATO.

    The remaining 80% are waiting for the Russian liberators! soldier
    1. +31
      25 July 2016 17: 06
      Yes, there are our people there.
    2. +6
      25 July 2016 20: 01
      Quote: engineer74
      The remaining 80% are waiting for the Russian liberators!

      Whats wrong with that? So it was already
    3. 0
      25 July 2016 23: 06
      unfortunately among Russians, not everyone supports Russian politics. Part openly supports the policy of a horned penguin and a kid in blue socks.
      ETV +, a propaganda channel in Russian, actively introduces the concept of "Estonian with Russian roots".
  4. +6
    25 July 2016 16: 57
    The Baltic media are already discussing the option of “countering the threat”.

    And what, in principle, can Estonia oppose to a missile strike? laughing
    1. +6
      25 July 2016 17: 02
      Quote: Observer 33
      The Baltic media are already discussing the option of “countering the threat”.

      And what, in principle, can Estonia oppose to a missile strike? laughing

      The senselessness of a missile strike on Estonia (not to be confused with NATO forces)! wassat
    2. +4
      25 July 2016 17: 48
      Quote: Observer 33
      What can Estonia counterposite with a missile strike?

      Absolutely insignificant value of their armed forces, for which it is a pity to spend a rocket. laughing
      1. +3
        25 July 2016 21: 18
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Quote: Observer 33
        What can Estonia counterposite with a missile strike?

        Absolutely insignificant value of their armed forces, for which it is a pity to spend a rocket. laughing

        American Negro and Estonian are sitting in a bar in Tallinn and drinking.
        The Estonian drank and said "I'm the boss here!"
        The American also drank and replies, "I'm the boss here!"
        Word for word, noise, argument .. They called the police, they were taken to the cell ...
        In the morning, a policeman enters the cell and asks "Well, figured out who is the boss?"
        The American nods and says "Yes, I am the owner", and the Estonian proudly answers "And I am the mistress!" laughing
    3. +1
      25 July 2016 19: 04
      Quote: Observer 33
      And what, in principle, can Estonia oppose to a missile strike?


      laughing Well, you’re a beast, colleague. Missiles Wasteful. One even a piece of a copy of sickly money weighs, are not a little expensive in Estonia being pulled? laughing Isn't it easier to comb this Estonian chuvirla with the Pskov landing? Win 100%. Quality assurance, as from the Latvian VEF.
    4. +3
      25 July 2016 20: 51
      [quote] And what, in principle, can Estonia oppose to a missile strike? / quote]

      Drive NATO and take your cars and bicycles off the road, calmly waiting for the passage of Russian tank columns to the west. Yes, and put up price tags in Russian in stores and cook a change in rubles for change. In principle, this is enough.
  5. +11
    25 July 2016 17: 04
    Everyone who has declared Russia a threat must clearly realize that from this moment they are the GOAL!
    And what and where will fly, these are the nuances .... Not many seem.

    So maybe it's better, "let's live together" ......
    1. 0
      25 July 2016 19: 36
      Quote: prior
      So maybe it's better, "let's live together" ......


      Yes, we do not mind. We don’t just like the Kazlov ... If they don’t understand the word the Kazlov, then what are we doing here?
    2. +1
      25 July 2016 21: 20
      2050, Tallinn. Opposite the Peking restaurant, former Palace,
      on Sin-Wan Square, the former Freedom Square, two Estonians, a shoe-polisher, are sitting.
      One says to another: "It was better with the Russians ... You didn't have to squint your eyes." laughing
  6. +3
    25 July 2016 17: 06
    Quote: Observer 33
    The Baltic media are already discussing the option of “countering the threat”.

    And what, in principle, can Estonia oppose to a missile strike? laughing

    Nuclear sprats ..? wassat
    1. +2
      25 July 2016 21: 22
      After joining the EU, it became possible for Estonians to work in Europe.
      One Estonian got a job as an assistant goat shepherd in the mountains of Spain to the local.
      Once, they drove goats to the corral, and one goat's head was stuck in the fence.
      The local shepherd was delighted, attached himself and did his job.
      Then he shouts to the Estonian - "Come here, it's your turn!"
      The Estonian sighed, said, "It must be so ...",
      came running and stuck his head in the fence .... laughing
  7. 0
    25 July 2016 17: 10
    The Baltic media are already discussing the option of "countering the threat."
    Countering the threat is like putting on diapers and lurking. Swineherds damn it.
    1. +1
      25 July 2016 20: 09
      Quote: BOB044
      Countering the threat is like putting on diapers and lurking. Swineherds damn it.


      Pampers ..... they in the thirties held a competition for the best rural toilet so as not to spoil anywhere
  8. 0
    25 July 2016 17: 14
    "... the option of" countering the threat "is being discussed ...
    Will they beat ?! belay I, the Balts know - "terrible" - avengers - people, they would have been taken out of the temporary corridor and explained that Brezhnev died, and Banionis is not their president ... They are stupid, "to thaw" ....! request
  9. -5
    25 July 2016 17: 24
    Offshore the United States, such exercises should be carried out (preferably joint), the effect would be clear and many problems would be resolved immediately (in politics and economics) .... Oh, dreams, Russia is still weak! And the Baltic states are mongrel .... Get out and kick them!))))
    1. +1
      25 July 2016 20: 11
      Quote: Chariton
      Off the coast of the USA, such exercises should be conducted


      You’re just like Academician Sakharov, he was the one who dreamed of laying a hydrogen bomb under the US coast and waiting for a convenient moment
  10. 0
    25 July 2016 17: 32
    interesting iskanderchiki how many miles fly? and God forbid, of course, warthogs have time to take off if something happens what
    1. +2
      25 July 2016 17: 54
      The performance characteristics of "Iskander" say up to 500 km. Only "Caliber" also wrote - up to 300 wassat
      1. +1
        25 July 2016 18: 09
        To 300 km is an export modification. The range of the Iskander BR is about 500 km with the mass of the warhead 480 kg. The Iskander with the JBF flies a couple of hundred kilometers further, about 700-900 km.
    2. +2
      25 July 2016 20: 17
      Quote: anna1980
      interesting iskanderchiki how many miles fly?

      It depends on what the Iskander-K racket can do for 2000 kilometers.
  11. 0
    25 July 2016 17: 46
    It would be nice if we never knew that Iskander could shoot a rocket a couple of thousand miles away. Because in this case there will already be everything. That's all. For all.
  12. +4
    25 July 2016 17: 47
    And my neighbor constantly eats vodka and swears that I fill him an apartment. Lives in the next entrance a floor above. Where are you my Iskander (do not judge strictly, I am boiling something)
  13. +1
    25 July 2016 17: 50
    Quote: prior
    Everyone who has declared Russia a threat must clearly realize that from this moment they are the GOAL!
    And what and where will fly, these are the nuances .... Not many seem.

    So maybe it's better, "let's live together" ......

    they were told that they are GOAL, you can deploy iskander and write on each rocket which one will fly where wassat Well, in the case of questions like this is not democratic crying Well, we can say that there are many goals so as not to forget laughing
  14. +3
    25 July 2016 18: 02
    Not more than 20% of the population "sees" the "Russian threat" in the Baltics, despite all the tricks of NATO

    In reality, we are not a threat to sprat eaters - but salvation
  15. +1
    25 July 2016 18: 12
    “The majority of those surveyed in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia (about 62%) stated that the greatest danger is international terrorism. "Russian threat"despite all the tricks of NATO, in the Baltics "see" no more than 20% of the population...

    Slow, oh how slowly it comes ...

    And then Trump almost openly said that no NATO is going to them from third forces ... laughing
    1. +1
      25 July 2016 18: 35
      Maybe feed them ?! Simple Russian dumplings with pork, beef and onions (coarsely chopped), with "thermonuclear" homemade horseradish and vinegar filling, with pepper-peas ground in a manual "home mill" ... With a crispy "rural" bun, grated with garlic, in a bite ... Press the dull, blond and brainless little head against the hairy Russian chest, squeeze the shrill mouth, stroke, regret ... Once again ... recourse I always feed stray dogs, and, here, people ... like ... feel
      1. 0
        25 July 2016 19: 53
        Quote: ALABAY45
        Maybe feed them ?! Simple Russian dumplings with pork, beef and onions (coarsely chopped), with "thermonuclear" homemade horseradish and vinegar filling, with pepper-peas ground in a manual "home mill" ... With a crispy "rural" bun, grated with garlic, in a bite ..



        F.R.en to them ... throughout the hara ... They did not deserve such charms from life ...
      2. 0
        25 July 2016 21: 27
        Quote: ALABAY45
        Maybe feed them ?!

        Well, no, it's better to drink them to zero gravity, and not to give a hangover in the morning !!! am
  16. +1
    25 July 2016 18: 19
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    The performance characteristics of "Iskander" say up to 500 km. Only "Caliber" also wrote - up to 300 wassat

    calibers flew by 1500 if I am not mistaken, well, iskanderchiki by 2500 is normal, right? wassat
  17. +2
    25 July 2016 18: 36
    And the photographer is not d. Urak and with a sense of humor - with his picture he meaningfully made it clear: "Guys, you all, oops!
  18. -4
    25 July 2016 18: 37
    At least I don’t understand the military significance of the sky and our Iskanders. It feels like it's just all dirty politics.
    Well, than Iskander will help us with YAB ??? - nothing.
    1. +5
      25 July 2016 18: 55
      Quote: ispanec
      At least I don’t understand the military significance of the sky and our Iskanders. It feels like it's just all dirty politics.
      Well, than Iskander will help us with YAB ??? - nothing.

      Iskander rocket flies on supersonic. When Americans discover a massive missile launch, there is about half an hour to respond. At this time, in a matter of minutes, the Iskander deployed and fired back on pro systems in Europe. They destroy these systems in a few minutes. And further, or at the same time as the Iskanders, ballistic missiles are launched, which will only be threatened by ship Aegis, which are actually not so many.
      I understand that.
      1. +1
        25 July 2016 20: 17
        "Upon detection of a massive launch of American missiles" ////

        All American BRs are located in the depths of the American continent.

        There are American missile defense missiles in Europe. But they cannot have
        mass launch. They can only intercept single BR medium
        ranges that Russia does not have (under the agreement). Launch missile defense, of course, can
        to destroy the Iskander "just in case."
        A more likely use of the Iskander is for air defense and Polish bases.
        1. +1
          25 July 2016 20: 40
          I support your view, I wanted to write it myself, they got ahead of me.
          Not a hat for Senka, Iskander a good countermeasure against Poland, Romania, to the Balkans. And these border areas 1 regiment can be taken in a couple of days.
        2. 0
          25 July 2016 20: 46
          Quote: voyaka uh
          "Upon detection of a massive launch of American missiles" ////

          All American BRs are located in the depths of the American continent.

          There are American missile defense missiles in Europe. But they cannot have
          mass launch. They can only intercept single BR medium
          ranges that Russia does not have (under the agreement). Launch missile defense, of course, can
          to destroy the Iskander "just in case."
          A more likely use of the Iskander is for air defense and Polish bases.

          Are you sure you carefully read my message?
          Quote: Muvka
          At this time, in a matter of minutes, the Iskanders deployed and fired back on the systems about in Europe

          Once again, just in case, I repeat: Iskanders are needed to neutralize the missile defense threatening our ICBMs. And with supersonic missiles, I think he is able to handle. In which case there will be a few minutes to destroy the system.
          1. -2
            25 July 2016 22: 37
            "Once again, just in case, I will repeat: Iskanders are needed to neutralize the missile defense that threatens our ICBMs" ////

            And I have to repeat: missile defense does not threaten the Russian ICBMs. It can only intercept
            BRDS on a high section of the trajectory. On takeoff does not have time. And Russian ICBMs are reasonably flying through
            North Pole from the depths of Russia.
            1. -1
              25 July 2016 23: 07
              Quote: voyaka uh
              "Once again, just in case, I will repeat: Iskanders are needed to neutralize the missile defense that threatens our ICBMs" ////

              And I have to repeat: missile defense does not threaten the Russian ICBMs. It can only intercept
              BRDS on a high section of the trajectory. On takeoff does not have time. And Russian ICBMs are reasonably flying through
              North Pole from the depths of Russia.

              I live in the Ivanovo region, we have mobile poplars and yars here in Teykovo. It is 300 km from Moscow. Even less. What nafig outback?
      2. 0
        25 July 2016 21: 43
        I read that the rocket flies 2100 m / s, and this is 7M? It turns out hypersound? Or am I misunderstanding something? Or about 2100 wiki lying?
        1. +1
          25 July 2016 22: 39
          This is a ballistic missile. It is "from time immemorial" on hypersound.
          1. -1
            25 July 2016 23: 09
            Well the distance is not that. I understand when ICBMs accelerate to such speeds ... Plus, it also maneuvers. Apparently, really at this stage the rocket cannot be intercepted.
  19. 0
    25 July 2016 18: 51
    "... the Baltic media are already discussing the option of" countering the threat. "
    There are many options, in fact ... Perhaps Iskander will fly by without noticing Estonia; knock him out of a slingshot; but who needs it, this Estonia ...
  20. 0
    25 July 2016 19: 00
    The rumble of wet hens in the Baltic chicken coop under the wise management of no less wet roosters from America causes bewilderment for normal people, and even annoyance, how much can ... like the normal population of these poor countries chew it all ... ?? ?
  21. +2
    25 July 2016 19: 40
    Quote: ispanec
    Well, than Iskander will help us with YAB ??? - nothing.

    But what, you propose to surrender, it’s not better than vigorous, so that the whole world is in ruin, but not on its knees, for soldering stew.
  22. +1
    25 July 2016 19: 59
    The majority of respondents in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia (about 62%) stated that the greatest danger is represented by international terrorism. Not more than 20% of the population "sees" the "Russian threat" in the Baltics, despite all the tricks of NATO.

    It can’t be, I thought, apart from Russians, Estonians are not afraid of anything at all. Well, it’s necessary to happen.
  23. 0
    25 July 2016 20: 31
    "Looking at this photo, it is not entirely clear what the photographer was trying to focus on: on" reinforcement "in the form of three policemen with a dog, or on ... well, you get the idea .."

    Focus on the photo somehow hints at what the emphasis is :)
    1. 0
      25 July 2016 21: 38
      Quote: realdiamond
      "Looking at this photo, it's not entirely clear what the photographer was trying to focus on.

      Yes, everything is clear, a normal man is a photographer, and the accent is correct, it is always more pleasant to look at a pretty female ass than on these three who are "in the tank, but not tankers" feel
      1. 0
        26 July 2016 08: 38
        Why, the dog is also pretty. It's a pity the owners were unlucky
  24. 0
    25 July 2016 21: 47
    Who are you shy about? we must say bluntly - we are training to destroy missile defense facilities in Europe, and after firing, they should immediately carry out the Chem exercises. troops laughing and lucidly explain (especially in the west) to everyone what the exercises are for and what consequences await the territory that sheltered the NATO missile defense.
  25. +2
    25 July 2016 23: 24
    Something like this ...
  26. +1
    26 July 2016 00: 15
    I will express my humble opinion on the Baltic countries.

    NATO is developing bases and missile defense at our borders.
    How much are we ready to wait and endure while our opponents build bridgeheads near our borders?

    In 1941, the Germans also drove the military to the Finnish border, and when they were ready, they immediately attacked.
    As a result, the whole war was on our territory, and nemchura built gas chambers and furnaces for our population.
    And our good neighbors from the Baltic countries worked in these camps at a non-dusty job, driving people into cells.

    And if we assume that Stalin would be bombed by all the aircraft on the bridgeheads of the Nazis, then the attack on Moscow would drown!

    So it turns out that these countries should be very wary of Russia because groups in these countries are increasingly threatening Russia!
  27. 0
    26 July 2016 04: 52
    Looking at this photo, it is not entirely clear what exactly the photographer tried to focus on: “reinforcement” in the form of three policemen with a dog or ... well, you understand ...
    It’s very clear that the focus is on this one, and the background with the police are blurry! laughing
  28. 0
    26 July 2016 05: 49
    test photo. The dog with three EYuhnem.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"