Media: Russia's actions violated the plans of the United States and its allies in the Black Sea

97
Russia recently made a lot of efforts to strengthen its position in the Black Sea, thus violating the plans of the United States and NATO regarding this region, Forbes magazine writes.

Media: Russia's actions violated the plans of the United States and its allies in the Black Sea


“Recently, the US has increasingly cooperated with the countries of the Black Sea coast, offering them to conduct naval maneuvers and exercises, as well as discussing with them the prospects for joint defense production. Washington explains such actions by the fact that the states bordering Russia need protection from a potential “threat” from Moscow, ”the article cited. RIA News.

“At the same time, Western countries are quite well aware that for hundreds of years Russia has considered the situation on the Black Sea as one of the most important guarantors of its security and has everything for this historical and strategic justifications, ”the author notes.

Therefore, “do not be surprised that recently Moscow has been deliberately working to return to its the fleet former glory, ”he emphasizes.

After the Crimea returned to the Russian Federation, "it blocked the Black Sea using a combination of 600 supersonic anti-ship missiles, kilometers of advanced military aircraft, as well as surface and submarine warships," the article says.

According to the author, "the capabilities of the Russian fleet can seriously limit the freedom of action of the United States and NATO in the Black Sea and demand an impressive increase in costs from the US defense industry."

Even small rocket ships can deliver a much stronger blow, “than ships of other naval forces, through the use of new Caliber cruise missiles and precision-guided munitions,” concludes the publication.
97 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +90
    25 July 2016 10: 31
    They don’t have anything to do with their fleet, we don’t conduct exercises in the Caribbean .....
    1. +47
      25 July 2016 10: 35
      Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
      we do not conduct exercises in the Caribbean .....

      C language removed. It would be very interesting to read their articles on the exercises in the Caribbean of the fleets of Russia, Mexico and Cuba.
      1. +26
        25 July 2016 11: 22
        Quote: Scoun
        It would be very interesting to read their articles on the exercises in the Caribbean of the fleets of Russia, Mexico and Cuba.

        at one time, the USSR deployed missiles in Cuba. as soon as the rumor about this reached the population of the Sashas, ​​a terrible panic rose there. people massively abandoned their homes and fled to central areas. and here we are, Nata is nearby, and we do not care laughing Kaliningrad was completely surrounded. just let them go am
        1. +5
          25 July 2016 11: 55
          We will not clap our ears, and we will block the straits.
        2. +12
          25 July 2016 15: 01
          Hearing did not reach - there was a tantrum. Kennedy immediately removed his Jupiters from the Turks, as if we were somehow dismantling our SS-17s, now we don’t have to sail big ships - the United States is already under the gun and they know this, not ordinary people, but rulers. The GDP more or less holds back the petaras striped from silly steps.
          1. +8
            25 July 2016 15: 40
            Quote: laogun
            Hearing did not reach - there was a tantrum. Kennedy immediately removed his Jupiters from the Turks, as if we were somehow dismantling our SS-17s, now we don’t have to sail big ships - the United States is already under the gun and they know this, not ordinary people, but rulers. The GDP more or less holds back the petaras striped from silly steps.

            Only 32 R-12 missiles were installed in Cuba (“product 8K63,” according to the American classification SS-4 Sandal). Why did he specify that our division was armed with these products and partially participated in Cuban events. My appeal was 1964 by 1967 Many after Cuba served in our division.
            1. +16
              25 July 2016 18: 24
              Quote: sgazeev
              Why did he specify that our division was armed with these products, and the military unit partially participated in the Cuban events. My appeal was 1964-1967.

              I can’t be responsible for what the officers said during tea on duty smile the first calculations arrived. barracks on the 2nd floor. 1 (maybe 2) is occupied by our officers. the other floor is a female maintenance company. Cuban. the next day our command asks to remove the company. the face of morality. changed. women again. ours again ask to change. as they say, someone heard the conversation of the Cuban command. "You can't please in Russian. The best b .. guys are gathered. They don't like it anyway" I repeat, maybe a bike laughing
              1. +5
                25 July 2016 19: 46
                Quote: Lukich
                I repeat, maybe the bike


                Plus! As the Italians say,
                Si non e vero, e bon travato -
                If not true, it’s well thought out!
                1. +2
                  26 July 2016 02: 05
                  With Italians, a separate story in general Italy could become a member of the Warsaw Pact with Alde More!
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. +16
              25 July 2016 20: 32
              "Media: Russia's actions have violated the plans of the United States and its allies in the Black Sea"

              The apartment has an alarm system and a contract has been concluded with the guard, which seriously violated the plans of apartment thieves. The media they bought is outraged ...
          2. +2
            25 July 2016 21: 12
            Kennedy immediately removed his jupiters from the Turks


            Right at once? not a year later?
            1. +1
              26 July 2016 14: 04
              The main thing that removed, as agreed.
          3. 0
            26 July 2016 15: 20
            ..maybe in the near future Turkey will redraw the entrance to the Black Sea for US warships for their "merits" in destabilizing Turkey.
            1. 0
              26 July 2016 17: 06
              Quote: ver_
              in the near future, Turkey will redraw the entrance to the Black Sea for US warships

              Required. This is in the plans of the Anglo-Saxons - to imitate a "complete" divorce from Turkey. How else to rip apart Europe?
      2. +6
        25 July 2016 14: 56
        Any dry cargo vessels with Club containers, with warheads of 100 and 500 kilotons, will soothe the uterus up to diarrhea.
        1. +3
          25 July 2016 19: 11
          Quote: laogun
          Club containers

          These containers can also be placed on corvettes, on a helipad, thereby increasing firepower.
      3. +4
        25 July 2016 21: 21
        It’s time to jerk the Yellow ... Ossian ...
      4. 0
        27 July 2016 17: 19
        Quote: Scoun
        C language removed. It would be very interesting to read their articles on the exercises in the Caribbean of the fleets of Russia, Mexico and Cuba.

        And it would be nice to drive our fleet led by "Peter" off the coast of potential friends!
    2. +16
      25 July 2016 10: 37
      Well, let the Papuans on the shores of Africa suffer! But they don’t climb into our waters!
      1. +24
        25 July 2016 10: 42
        Media: Russia's actions violated the plans of the United States and its allies in the Black Sea

        Or maybe it was precisely the US plans for the Black Sea that prompted Russia to act?
        1. +7
          25 July 2016 11: 27
          Quote: SRC P-15
          Media: Russia's actions violated the plans of the United States and its allies in the Black Sea

          Or maybe it was precisely the US plans for the Black Sea that prompted Russia to act?

          I think that it was the actions of the United States that prompted Russia to take such measures. Only the United States strenuously denies this. The United States and its phobias have already done so many troubles that cannot be corrected in 100 years.
        2. +8
          25 July 2016 13: 05
          So our officials just wake up from a kick in the ass ... Who prevents the Emergencies Ministry from conducting training together with Cuba and other friendly countries to rescue a submarine off the coast of America ??? Our staff officers have not yet learned to work proactively, so we slurp to the fullest, watching Nata dancing around Russia with a tambourine. And this will ... o will be as long as the "golden" growth is growing over the hill, while "our" "elite" goes to Russia as a watch, while officials of all levels have accounts and houses THERE. And Putin, with all due respect to him for the Army and the Navy, apparently cannot cope with this orgy.
          1. 0
            25 July 2016 18: 29
            Quote: Rom14
            Who prevents the Ministry of Emergencies from training with Cuba and other friendly countries to save the submarine off the coast of America ???

            finance. count so how much it will cost. but besides Cuba there are friendly countries? where will all this be refueling, replenishing supplies?
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. +7
          25 July 2016 15: 45
          Quote: SRC P-15
          Media: Russia's actions violated the plans of the United States and its allies in the Black Sea

          Or maybe it was precisely the US plans for the Black Sea that prompted Russia to act?

          It’s good that the drunk was no longer there, otherwise they washed themselves with tears, Yugoslavia pumped up, but God couldn’t endure that Russia was being flabbergasted. During the time he took him to hell. May God give Putin good health.
      2. WKS
        +7
        25 July 2016 11: 01
        In the event of war, now the Black and Baltic Seas are mousetraps for NATO ships, and perhaps the Mediterranean as well.
    3. +9
      25 July 2016 10: 37
      I agree that these American parasites all over the world crawled painfully.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    4. +12
      25 July 2016 10: 40
      Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
      we do not conduct exercises in the Caribbean.

      We’re not doing it yet ... wink
      But already it would be necessary to carry out !! am
      1. 0
        27 July 2016 15: 52
        So psychologically worse. The fact that they are doing something somewhere and the hedgehog is understandable, but that they are doing something incomprehensibly and where it is, therefore, is terribly annoying ..
    5. +6
      25 July 2016 10: 42
      Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
      They don’t have anything to do with their fleet, we don’t conduct exercises in the Caribbean .....

      Maybe it's time to start?
      1. +3
        25 July 2016 11: 58
        Quote: Verdun
        Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
        They don’t have anything to do with their fleet, we don’t conduct exercises in the Caribbean .....

        Maybe it's time to start?

        it’s too early, elections will be held, they will look at the sanity of the new administration and if it is hopeless, the USA will expect a lot of surprises
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. +6
      25 July 2016 11: 15
      If we take into account that the United States and Turkey went graters, then the Americans in the Black Sea will not be comme il faut at all.
      1. +4
        25 July 2016 11: 25
        Quote: siberalt
        If we take into account that the United States and Turkey went graters, then the Americans in the Black Sea will not be comme il faut at all.

        if the Turks let them go there at all laughing
    8. +2
      25 July 2016 11: 32
      Why not start the exercises with Cuba? Or interfere like a dancer?
      1. +2
        25 July 2016 11: 38
        Quote: siberalt
        If you also consider that the United States and Turkey went graters,

        ... Then it makes sense to conduct anti-terrorism exercises with Turkey, where 14 ships of the Turkish squadron will be caught ... NATO 14 ships .. laughing
    9. +2
      25 July 2016 14: 53
      We’ll finish the canal and we will conduct exercises with the Chinese in the Caribbean. Right now they are silent about the channel - and it will already be there, like a gopher.
    10. +2
      25 July 2016 15: 31
      The Forbes Magazine was fed up with the rich, and so they decided to practice military topics. Soon, Playboy will be scribbling opuses. laughing
    11. +1
      25 July 2016 16: 55
      But it was not bad at all, let them once again think about contacting Kam! fool
    12. 0
      26 July 2016 03: 17
      But because we do not conduct and there is nothing to bargain with. It is necessary to carry out and the base on the cube must be revived even formally. Only this way it is possible to agree with the Yankees everything else is from treacherous or pure water.
      1. 0
        27 July 2016 04: 26
        ..Base in Cuba? What for? Better methods exist and work ... America's debt will sink America. And this is not far off. And who needs it, they are working on it quite professionally. Now the state of this country resembles the USSR in the sixties of the last century. Infrastructure is falling apart, roads are falling apart .., fuel for nuclear power plants began to be bought from us, unemployment is growing, social discontent in the country is growing, and there is no money for the "national economy", but modern production has been moved to developing countries and will remain there ..
    13. 0
      27 July 2016 10: 22
      we do not conduct exercises in the Caribbean .....

      and probably I should
    14. 0
      27 July 2016 20: 37
      It’s a pity that we don’t. And it would be necessary !!!
    15. 0
      28 July 2016 05: 42
      But this is a flaw in our foreign policy. It is necessary to restore relations with Cuba and place our military base there, then we’ll see how the states will sing. What they’re doing is in no way within their borders, imposing their shit democracy they destroy entire states and peoples without any responsibility. The time has come to shake this world gendarme so that they would calm down for a long time and maybe forever.
  2. +16
    25 July 2016 10: 32
    Some strange ones.
    Of course, we will defend our borders on the Black Sea in general and Crimea in particular.
    And does it affect NATO or not? We don’t really care.
  3. +22
    25 July 2016 10: 35
    It turns out that the "Crimean bummer" is not so much a "bummer" of Maidania as the United States? In general, it was possible to imagine that there would be a US naval base in Sevastopol only in a nightmare. This in one fell swoop would close the region for our own fleet, and endanger the entire South of Russia.
    1. +23
      25 July 2016 11: 00
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      It turns out that the "Crimean bummer" is not so much a "bummer" of Maidania as the United States?

      Yes, a colleague, it is, the Maidan people themselves, mattresses and figs did not fall, well, perhaps as cannon fodder and the territory inhabited by evil mongrels barking at Russia. And mattress makers need, first of all, Crimea, Who owns Crimea, he controls Black Sea. Even after the orange Maidan, ships of Americans and NATO became frequent there. During the revolution, the semi-ruberoid Barak Monkeyanich was already happily rubbing his little hands about Crimea, but the "polite" people, together with the people of Crimea, sent him back to collect bananas on a palm tree. fellow This is where the legs of all these sanctions and demonizations grow. hi
    2. +7
      25 July 2016 11: 20
      And the memory of the ancestors ?! Which shed blood for Crimea. This is equivalent if the EBN allowed Moscow to be occupied following the example of Berlin ...
    3. +1
      25 July 2016 13: 19
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      jeopardized the entire south of Russia.

      Plus, it’s also a terrible blow to national pride, which is also very important.
  4. +24
    25 July 2016 10: 35
    "Russia recently made a lot of efforts to strengthen its position in the Black Sea, than violated US plans and NATO regarding this region"...

    We live here ... And where is the USA?
    Gopnik, climbing with weapons into someone else's territory, into a house, into an apartment - as a rule, they shoot him ...
  5. +7
    25 July 2016 10: 35
    It is necessary to conduct joint Russian-Cuban naval exercises.
  6. +7
    25 July 2016 10: 36
    Peace and prosperity to our unsinkable aircraft carrier KRYM. Enemies - Tremble! WE are on our Russian land.
  7. +11
    25 July 2016 10: 40
    "Russia's actions have violated the plans of the United States and its allies in the Black Sea", a balm for the soul !!! I would read and read ... wink
    1. 0
      25 July 2016 12: 28
      Quote: Masya Masya
      "Russia's actions violated the plans of the United States and its allies in the Black Sea",

      what, again Putin ?? and here it could not have done without him? then it’s he who killed the dacha saiga ... laughing
  8. +3
    25 July 2016 10: 40
    The Black Sea will remain our sea, there are no rivals equal to us in equipping the fleet and no motivation. The Turks still somehow and something can quantitatively oppose us, but all the other countries of the Black Sea basin taken together, absolutely nothing.
    1. 0
      25 July 2016 10: 51
      Quote: Arkan The Black Sea will remain our sea, there are no rivals equal to us in equipping the fleet and no motivation ...
      ... but all the other countries of the Black Sea basin taken together, absolutely nothing.

      Of course not. But, this is not our fault. They tried those who really wanted to see their base in Sevastopol.
      "How Bulgaria Dies: EU, Self-Immolation, Russophobia and Russophilia".
      http://rusvesna.su/recent_opinions/1464600694
  9. +10
    25 July 2016 10: 46
    And after the commissioning of the Black Sea Fleet of all planned ships and submarines, as well as coastal services, the Black Sea can again be called the Russian Sea
  10. +4
    25 July 2016 10: 57
    We pinched their nose on the Black Sea. Pleases. Do not stand NATO ships at the pier in Sevastopol. Now, nevermind them, but how they wanted tongue
    1. +1
      25 July 2016 22: 34
      Quote: BOB044
      Do not stand NATO ships at the pier in Sevastopol.

      The frigate Ross and the landing ship are participating in BREEZE-16 from the states. Destroyers and frigates visited earlier, but the landing ships are new. They changed Sevastopol to Constanta and Odessa.
  11. +4
    25 July 2016 10: 57
    The shores of the Black Sea belong to Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Romania, Georgia and Abkhazia.

    What are they "plans"can the United States have in this water area? Russia does not conduct exercises in the Gulf of Mexico; what do the ameroids want here? Still hoping"to rent"Crimea near Ukraine, laughing , by type like "rent"Guantanamo near Cuba.
  12. +8
    25 July 2016 11: 01
    How much the previous Hohlak authorities mocked over our fleet in the Crimea, they all dared to do all sorts of dirty tricks! And the current junta was supposed to banish our base altogether. The annexation of the Crimea is a brilliant operation carried out without losses and used by the people of the peninsula and Russia! Now having such a bastion at our disposal, we are keeping the adversaries on the spot!
  13. +3
    25 July 2016 11: 03
    Russian - Our Black Sea! good soldier good
  14. +2
    25 July 2016 11: 03
    NATO’s sadness in the loss of Crimea is understandable, but not all pies and donuts ...
  15. +1
    25 July 2016 11: 07
    It is necessary, oh, it is necessary to violate NATO's "plans", and it would be good to try to violate it (NATO) from within. Find the weak link and break. And also exercises off the American coast ...
    1. +1
      25 July 2016 12: 33
      Quote: Alex von Dorn
      It is necessary, oh, it is necessary to violate NATO's "plans", and it would be good to try to violate it (NATO) from within.

      found itself. Turkey. already open sash sends
  16. Riv
    +1
    25 July 2016 11: 09
    ... and none of the Americans thought that if the "Caliber" launcher could be mounted on a small ship, then all the more simply it is mounted on any merchant ship making regular voyages along the US coast ...
  17. 0
    25 July 2016 11: 11
    One random launch of the Bastion and there will be no NATO ships in the Black Sea. Well, we, of course, express our regret.
    1. KCA
      +3
      25 July 2016 15: 00
      unfortunately, "Onyx" is not a MANPADS, it fired, and there the rocket itself will find and catch up, target illumination is needed, "accidentally" it will not work
  18. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      25 July 2016 12: 36
      Quote from rudolf
      Therefore, talking about the Russian Sea is somewhat reckless. Rather, about the balance or balance of forces in the region.

      but for now. we are at home and ammunition is available. and they need to be taken from behind puddles.
    2. 0
      27 July 2016 16: 03
      And her hell knows what nastiness in store from EW developments in such a case with us ..
  19. +1
    25 July 2016 11: 42
    Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
    we do not conduct exercises in the Caribbean .....


    and why?
    1. -1
      25 July 2016 13: 04
      Quote: Redactor
      and why?

      I beg you, a no brainer. The sea-goers guarded me from the sea - they’ll suck, who should I clean?
  20. +2
    25 July 2016 11: 43
    It is necessary to strive for the Black Sea to be called as it should be called the Russian Sea.
  21. +2
    25 July 2016 11: 46
    Cover them with oxygen, bastard.
  22. +2
    25 July 2016 12: 44
    We do not climb, for example, into the Gulf of Mexico. So what did they forget with us?
    And this will continue until they get in the face and tight.
  23. +2
    25 July 2016 12: 49
    This is our sea !!!!!!!!!! am angry
  24. +2
    25 July 2016 14: 15
    The US and NATO should admit that Russia will no longer allow people to talk to themselves through clenched teeth. The West should think about the quality level of diplomacy with Russia. At the same time, diplomacy must be benevolent. And in fact what ?. Even WADA found doping only in Russian athletes. And nothing that athletes from other states. incl. and the United States are caught doping. These are "their" guys.
  25. +2
    25 July 2016 14: 35
    Overconfident American strategists ("an exceptional nation") have already lost twice to "regional Russia":
    - the Americans were sure that the process of the collapse of the USSR in Russia would continue automatically. Yeltsin, a dodger, speaking in Kazan loudly announced - "Take as much sovereignty as you can take." Several national districts "wanted" to leave Russia at once, even the governor of the Sverdlovsk region. Rossel announced the creation of the "Ural Republic". And only after the "2nd Chechen" the Americans realized that they had lost in this matter. Russia was able to defend its integrity.
    - The Americans were confident that after 2019, Sevastopol will become the base of the NATO Navy. But now they realized that they also lost here.
    From their powerlessness against "regional Russia", they staged a large-scale Russophobic clamor
    their vassals at all levels, and even in sports. Strong does not do that.
  26. +2
    25 July 2016 14: 41
    The Sea Breeze exercise should be held in the Caribbean with the participation of ships from Russia, Cuba, Venezuela and Mexico to repel US aggression against Central American countries. Let the United States "scratch" its "underbelly".
  27. 0
    25 July 2016 15: 17
    Yes, swim. Let's practice on them. Not only planes fly over. Submariners, saboteurs need to train. Wellcome, damn it.
  28. 0
    25 July 2016 17: 40
    Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
    They don’t have anything to do with their fleet, we don’t conduct exercises in the Caribbean .....

    We’re not doing it yet ... good
  29. +1
    25 July 2016 18: 48
    In time, Crimea was returned back to Russia! And then there would be a US naval base there and would have to bite my elbows.
  30. +3
    25 July 2016 19: 12
    Frigate Fech: Twelve Hours of Shame on the US Navy


    Teach the materiel, son, otherwise the Russians will laugh. What can you advise American sailors? To reduce self-importance, stop falsifying reports and learn materiel ... For many of our fellow citizens, it is far from a secret that the military power of the United States is far from what we are shown in American action films. Messages about problems in the most powerful army in the world are being received more and more often. We already wrote about a series of US Air Force disasters, where we also mentioned problems with the new generation of F-35 and F-22 fighters. But this time the navy caught our attention. On July 14, during exercises in the Pacific Ocean, the American military could not sink a ship of a conditional enemy for 12 hours. As a target, the decommissioned USS Thach ship was chosen. According to the calculations of the US military, the ship was supposed to sink after the first strike. However, having withstood the hit of the Harpoon anti-ship missile, he continued, as if nothing had happened, to sway in the waves. Over the next few hours, the ship was repeatedly fired from other vessels, attacked by F / A-18 Hornet carrier-based fighter jets, and even survived the strike with a B-52 strategic bomber. However, this also did not bring significant results. Ultimately, the command of the Navy ordered the Fech to be torpedoed by a submarine, but even after that the ship went to the bottom only after 12 hours.

    Source: http://politikus.ru/articles/81194-fregat-fech-dvenadcat-chasov-pozora-flota-ssh
    a.html
    Politikus.ru
    1. -2
      25 July 2016 20: 55
      Yes, all is not without sin. We were informed about the DCBF, but how much more did Putin not report to Putin and Shoigu ????
    2. 0
      26 July 2016 04: 54
      he turned out to be a strong old man, and they had rockets ...
  31. 0
    25 July 2016 19: 21
    Still, they would not have broken it when, on the eve of the glorious annexation of Crimea to Russia, even under Yanukovych, the Americans, already in Sevastopol, with their grandmothers repaired schools for their placement, divided the quay walls where which American ship would stand, but how not to be disappointed - bummer in one word complete ... and childish resentment what kind of toy they took away, oh damn "polite people", led by the most "polite person". What a trouble, it was not possible to gain a foothold in Sevastopol ... !!!
  32. 0
    25 July 2016 19: 34
    For rams, donkeys and other ignoramuses from the United States, the Pentagon and the Geysouz ... read History .. everything is said ....

    I quote: Encyclopedic dictionary for you ignoramus ...

    The Russian Sea is the name of the Black Sea in ancient Russian and Arabic sources. * * * RUSSIAN SEA, the name of the Black Sea in Russian chronicles (see CHRONICLES) when describing the events of 9-15 centuries, as well as in Arabic sources of the 10th century ...
    Where do you send to the post office so that you know ..
    Everything and the question should be closed ..
  33. 0
    25 July 2016 20: 36
    Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
    They don’t have anything to do with their fleet, we don’t conduct exercises in the Caribbean .....

    But it would be interesting, I see directly the headline in the New York Times, the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation conducts exercises in the Caribbean in connection with the dangerous migration of plankton, and containment of aggression from the side of the male
  34. +2
    25 July 2016 20: 49
    I have spoken and will continue to say that without Crimea Ukraine is a soup "and don’t need it for nothing," but Crimea without Ukraine is a "tidbit." If someone thinks that the sanctions and other nasty things from America because of the Donbas and the Minsk agreements - HA-HA-HA. BECAUSE OF THE CRIMEA !!! Only Crimea they will not see now, they understand it. But survive that theirs, exceptional, so they "lowered" and all their "work" for one day was "zeroed" - they just can't. And they won't be able to do it for a long time.
    Yes, that's just to abandon the Crimea, YOURSELF MORE EXPENSIVE!
  35. 0
    26 July 2016 10: 05
    How simple and predictable is)))
    According to the author, “the capabilities of the Russian fleet can seriously limit the freedom of action of the United States and NATO in the Black Sea and require an impressive increase in spending from the US defense industry”

    The age-old mantra: "More gold is needed!" © (War Craft)))))
  36. 0
    26 July 2016 10: 10
    Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
    we do not conduct exercises in the Caribbean .....

    And apparently in vain ...
  37. 0
    26 July 2016 10: 45
    Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
    They don’t have anything to do with their fleet, we don’t conduct exercises in the Caribbean .....

    And it would be necessary that sometimes would look back.
  38. +1
    26 July 2016 12: 19
    As you want, if you want, but what we took Crimea, dada, it took to ourselves, I think is the right decision. No matter how the horses rode, it was they themselves who poured their future, wanting to push the rolls to the west and east, who would give more. And we wiped the nose of the mattresses and their henchmen with the Crimea, and now from the south we can no longer be warned about the wrong course of our democracy. So they rave about, demonizing Russia. The image of the enemy is very necessary. What is the money to spend? That's just their true enemy wears the mask of their friend and stands next to them, meanly inviting.
  39. 0
    26 July 2016 14: 01
    It is necessary to make sure that the crews of US ships and their satellites when entering the Russian Sea constantly suffer from severe diarrhea syndrome.
  40. +1
    26 July 2016 15: 11
    Blocked oxygen in the Black Sea, now it's time to deploy a troop grouping in Cuba, near the US borders
  41. 0
    26 July 2016 15: 29
    Quote: sgazeev
    Quote: SRC P-15
    Media: Russia's actions violated the plans of the United States and its allies in the Black Sea

    Or maybe it was precisely the US plans for the Black Sea that prompted Russia to act?

    It’s good that the drunk was no longer there, otherwise they washed themselves with tears, Yugoslavia pumped up, but God couldn’t endure that Russia was being flabbergasted. During the time he took him to hell. May God give Putin good health.

    .. and who can say for sure - for better or for better what happened? Here are the "brothers" Bulgarians at all times sold us, like others ..
  42. +1
    26 July 2016 15: 59
    There was such a story, the Americans carried out exercises, including the discovery of Soviet atomic boats, many ships gathered, etc. The exercises were held, the Americans successfully reported to their superiors that everything is OK, and suddenly, in the center of their ring from all sorts of ships, our boat pops up, waves a pen and leaves again, oh how)))) And the exercises themselves were generally somewhere in their ter / waters ...
  43. 0
    27 July 2016 11: 19
    Anneher whoever there is to do in the RUSSIAN SEA.
  44. 0
    27 July 2016 14: 36
    The existence of Russia has violated US plans to conquer the world
  45. 0
    27 July 2016 15: 35
    New Russian riddles - "Our spool is small, but" Caliber is "big bold" .. "Small, remote, does not eat, does not sleep, He himself sits in the Caspian Sea, looks after the Dardanelles, looks after Gibraltar" ..
  46. +1
    27 July 2016 23: 08
    Curiously, in the late 70s, Turkey stated that it was considering closing the passage through the Bosphorus to the Mediterranean for warships of the Soviet Union. To this statement, comrade Gromyko Andrei Andreevich (USSR Foreign Minister from 1957 to 1985) told American reporters at the White House cocktail party that the passage to the Mediterranean Black Sea Fleet of the USSR would require only a couple of volleys of missiles. As a result of this, in addition to the Bosphorus, two more passages will appear in the Mediterranean, but, alas, there will be no Istanbul. After these words, Turkey never again raised the issue of closing the Bosphorus to the warships of the USSR. fellow