Military Review

"Admiral Grigorovich" performed military shooting in the Black Sea

51
The Russian frigate “Admiral Grigorovich” performed artillery firing in the Black Sea, fragments of which were shown by the Zvezda channel. Reports about it Rossiyskaya Gazeta.




"Shooting was conducted on a towed sea shield and dropped aviation targets, ”the report says.

It is noted that in the framework of the exercise "the crew of the frigate also worked out the tactics of delivering a missile strike and defense from the means of air attack of a conditional enemy."

The training event also involved “missile boat, sea tug and Black Sea maritime aircraft fleet».



Help newspaper: "frigate" Admiral Grigorovich "project 11356 transferred to the Russian fleet in March 2016, the ship is equipped with a missile attack system" Caliber-NK. " Sailing range is about 5000 miles. Maximum travel speed - 30 knots. Crew - 200 man. "Admiral Grigorovich" is the first of a series of ships that will become part of the Black Sea Fleet in the coming years. "
Photos used:
Vladimir Pasyakin / RG
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Abbra
    Abbra 22 July 2016 12: 28
    +9
    ... The Russian frigate Admiral Grigorovich carried out artillery fire in the Black Sea ... Destroyed 14 training goals. In the area of ​​firing, 14 Turkish flags were found ... fellow
    1. cniza
      cniza 22 July 2016 13: 03
      +6
      Good ship, C.F. becomes a serious force.
      1. Wiruz
        Wiruz 22 July 2016 13: 06
        -8
        Good ship, C.F. becomes a serious force.

        It would have been a good ship twenty years ago. Now - "May Sho May" request
      2. Alexey-74
        Alexey-74 22 July 2016 16: 11
        +3
        very good and successful ships of this series, but one thing ... "but" they are few
    2. Wiruz
      Wiruz 22 July 2016 13: 06
      -3
      As if there was information that the Turkish Navy lost 14 ships laughing
      1. Abbra
        Abbra 22 July 2016 13: 16
        -2
        So I’m just about that ... recourse
        1. Abbra
          Abbra 22 July 2016 16: 31
          0
          "Turk" in Russia was sometimes a household name. That was the name of affectionately stupid and narrow-minded people. The author of the minuses seems to be the very "Turk" who does not have a sense of humor. Well, I personally cannot explain the disappearance of these mysterious 14 Turkish ships, about which some media screamed so furiously.
        2. alexmach
          alexmach 22 July 2016 19: 32
          0
          I don’t know, comrades. On the one hand it’s funny. On the other hand, it would be good if they had never been found — our sea will be freer ... And on the third, that if the lost ships suddenly emerge at the most inopportune moment. Drown something under the pirate flag and not the Turkish one?
  2. Teberii
    Teberii 22 July 2016 12: 30
    0
    Well done just when the guests gathered for us.
  3. WAN
    WAN 22 July 2016 12: 30
    +1
    Quote: Abbra
    ... The Russian frigate Admiral Grigorovich carried out artillery fire in the Black Sea ... Destroyed 14 training goals. In the area of ​​firing, 14 Turkish flags were found ... fellow


    Yeah. And America is gone bully But seriously - 7 feet under the keel!
  4. activator
    activator 22 July 2016 12: 32
    +7
    I apologize that it was not the topic, but the Sejm of Poland decided to recognize the Volyn tragedy-massacre as genocide. From the oath of Muscovites. laughing
  5. Stabilization
    Stabilization 22 July 2016 12: 34
    +2
    UKSK "Caliber-NK" (8 anti-submarine or anti-ship missiles), 100-mm AU A-190, 2 modules ZRAK "Kortik" or "Broadsword" (64 SAM 9M311, 6000 rounds), PU ZS90 SAM "Shtil-1" ( 36 missiles), 8x1 Igla-1 SAM launchers, 1x12 RBU-6000 RPK-8 launchers (48 PLUR 90R or RGB-60), 2x2 533 mm DTA-53-956 (SET-65, 53-65K torpedoes), 1 helicopter Ka-27PL or Ka-31.


    I found the composition of the ship’s weapons ... It’s not enough like striking means.
    1. Dimon19661
      Dimon19661 22 July 2016 12: 36
      +1
      So is the ship of the second rank.
      1. Stabilization
        Stabilization 22 July 2016 12: 39
        -4
        I'm not talking about the ranks, but in principle ... The dimensions are pretty impressive, there are a lot of places and only 8 calibers ... And the composition of the air defense systems is not surprising, if I’m not mistaken, pretty old things.
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 22 July 2016 13: 35
          +6
          Quote: Stabilization
          I'm not talking about the ranks, but in principle ... The dimensions are pretty impressive, there are a lot of places and only 8 calibers ... And the composition of the air defense systems is not surprising, if I’m not mistaken, pretty old things.

          so you about the ranks why, the ship is not an oceanic zone, (although they go there, for lack of) it is enough. for a destroyer, yes, it would not be enough, as I remember, NATO members found that the armament of the project 956 "sarych" was unnecessary, but there were 8 "mosquitoes", two AK-130s, an air defense system "hurricane", and an AK-630. RBU 1000, - 2 TA caliber 533mm, RM-1 / UDM / PM-1. The project is beautiful, powerful, he would have had a GTU in his time, would still terrify his "friends." in the sea for shooting (uh "persistent") BF, bow AK-130-after several shots refused, a little later, the boilers "colonized", home in tow ... like that ... we rejoice for the time being "patrolman". recourse
        2. Dimon19661
          Dimon19661 22 July 2016 14: 23
          -1
          It is the rank of the ship that determines its size and composition of weapons.
    2. DenZ
      DenZ 22 July 2016 12: 40
      -5
      Quote: Stabilization
      UKSK "Caliber-NK" (8 anti-submarine or anti-ship missiles),
      It must be assumed that the installation of 8 missiles. The stock of missiles is naturally much larger.
      1. vadimtt
        vadimtt 22 July 2016 12: 43
        +2
        It seems like not, container missiles, 2x4. Cells are recharged in the port.
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 22 July 2016 13: 27
          0
          Quote: vadimtt
          It seems like not, container missiles, 2x4. Cells are recharged in the port.

          The Hindus put another UKKS instead of RBU - 6000. That is, 16 missiles. But without PTZ comes out.
          IMHO 11356 - a normal, balanced and, most importantly, relatively inexpensive guard. Could be massive. But with the gas turbine engine - a hickey.
      2. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 22 July 2016 13: 36
        0
        Quote: DenZ
        It must be assumed that the installation of 8 missiles. The stock of missiles is naturally much larger.

        amateurs ... crying
        1. DenZ
          DenZ 23 July 2016 15: 24
          0
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          amateurs ...

          I assumed and not argued. However, google the topic. It is a pity that the stock is not large at all.
    3. Wiruz
      Wiruz 22 July 2016 13: 08
      +3
      Neither Cortica nor the Broadsword are there, the AK-630 are. Yes, the Shtil-1 anti-aircraft missiles are not 36, but 24
      1. Alex777
        Alex777 22 July 2016 13: 15
        0
        Quote: Wiruz
        Neither Cortica nor the Broadsword are there, the AK-630 are. Yes, the Shtil-1 anti-aircraft missiles are not 36, but 24

        Beat ahead hi
    4. Alex777
      Alex777 22 July 2016 13: 14
      0
      Quote: Stabilization
      UKSK "Caliber-NK" (8 anti-submarine or anti-ship missiles), 100-mm AU A-190, 2 modules ZRAK "Kortik" or "Broadsword" (64 SAM 9M311, 6000 rounds), PU ZS90 SAM "Shtil-1" ( 36 missiles), 8x1 Igla-1 SAM launchers, 1x12 RBU-6000 RPK-8 launchers (48 PLUR 90R or RGB-60), 2x2 533 mm DTA-53-956 (SET-65, 53-65K torpedoes), 1 helicopter Ka-27PL or Ka-31.


      I found the composition of the ship’s weapons ... It’s not enough like striking means.


      Neither the Cortic nor the Broadsword with missiles. There are AK 630 - 2 pieces. Dirks - Indian specification.
      All air defense - 24 (and not 36) Shtil-1 missiles. Which in itself is not so bad compared to the 1155 air defense, for example.
      8x1 is the Caliber in UKKS.
    5. Sergey39
      Sergey39 22 July 2016 13: 17
      -4
      It all depends on the number of ships. Here after 2025 we will show them
      1. Wiruz
        Wiruz 22 July 2016 13: 32
        0
        It all depends on the number of ships. Here after 2025 we will show them

        The main thing is not to be ashamed to show
    6. sub307
      sub307 22 July 2016 13: 18
      0
      Generally "Admiral Grigorovich" - multipurpose frigate of the far sea zone of project 11356R / M. So, the composition of the "strike assets" is appropriate. Since the customer (the Russian Navy) knows better somehow - how and in what operational formations (formations) the ship is planned to be used.
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 22 July 2016 13: 39
        -2
        Quote: sub307
        Generally "Admiral Grigorovich" is a multipurpose frigate of the far sea zone

        in fact, "Grigorovich" is a patrol ship, its function is to protect the coastal sea zone.
        1. sub307
          sub307 22 July 2016 17: 21
          0
          Quote: Andrei Yurievich
          in fact, "Grigorovich" is a patrol ship, its function is to protect the coastal sea zone.

          Well, I don’t know, I use what I read:
          "Project 11356 frigates are designed to protect the country's far sea zone. The Admiral Grigorovich was laid down in 2010 at the Yantar shipyard in Kaliningrad and launched in the spring of 2014. The development of the project's patrol ships is being carried out by the Northern Design Bureau."
          http://www.aif.ru/dontknows/file/chto_predstavlyaet_soboy_fregat_admiral_grigoro
          vich

          "Admiral Grigorovich is a frigate, the lead patrol ship of Project 11356, which is in service with the Russian Black Sea Fleet. The ship is part of the 30th surface ship division ..."
          https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%B4%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB_%D0%93%
          D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_(%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%
          D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BB%D1%8C)
        2. sub307
          sub307 22 July 2016 17: 21
          0
          Quote: Andrei Yurievich
          in fact, "Grigorovich" is a patrol ship, its function is to protect the coastal sea zone.

          Well, I don’t know, I use what I read:
          "Project 11356 frigates are designed to protect the country's far sea zone. The Admiral Grigorovich was laid down in 2010 at the Yantar shipyard in Kaliningrad and launched in the spring of 2014. The development of the project's patrol ships is being carried out by the Northern Design Bureau."
          http://www.aif.ru/dontknows/file/chto_predstavlyaet_soboy_fregat_admiral_grigoro
          vich

          "Admiral Grigorovich is a frigate, the lead patrol ship of Project 11356, which is in service with the Russian Black Sea Fleet. The ship is part of the 30th surface ship division ..."
          https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%B4%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB_%D0%93%
          D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_(%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%
          D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BB%D1%8C)
  6. Leto
    Leto 22 July 2016 12: 37
    -8
    The entom was lucky with the air defense system, it will plow to the full, unlike Gorshkov ...
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 22 July 2016 13: 09
      +2
      Only the range is not happy. Gorshkov was supposed to have an air defense system capable of hitting 120-150 km, in the future - 200-250 km. Grigorovich has 70 km. The difference is quite noticeable.
      1. Alex777
        Alex777 22 July 2016 13: 18
        -1
        Calm-1 has a range of 50km.
        His missile in Buka-M3 actually flies 70km, but in Buka there is a completely different guidance system than in Calm-1.
        I can’t say for Calm, but Redut’s target speed is up to 1000 m / s, and Buka-M3’s up to 3000 m / s.
        1. Wiruz
          Wiruz 22 July 2016 13: 38
          -1
          and at Buka-M3 - up to 3000 m / s.

          Chago ??? Two times less actually - about 1550 m / s. Say, you, speed of 9 Machs winked
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 22 July 2016 15: 24
            +1
            Quote: Wiruz
            and at Buka-M3 - up to 3000 m / s.

            Chago ??? Two times less actually - about 1550 m / s. Say, you, speed of 9 Machs winked

            You respected bewildered the speed of the interceptor missile (~ 1500 m / s) and the speed of the target being hit (up to 3000 m / s).
            A reference for you:
            http://nevskii-bastion.ru/buk-m3/
            1. Wiruz
              Wiruz 22 July 2016 16: 46
              +1
              I apologize hi I read it wrong wink
              1. Alex777
                Alex777 22 July 2016 18: 55
                +1
                Quote: Wiruz
                I apologize hi I read it wrong wink

                It's nice to talk with intelligent people. hi

                As I understand it, guidance in Calm-1 was done following the example of Aegis, and in Buk-M3 - as in S-300.
                Apparently therefore, with the same missile, different maximum range of destruction and channel on targets.
                I did not see data on the speed of targets in Calm-1 with a new missile. But IMHO they should be better than Redoubt.
  7. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 22 July 2016 12: 37
    0
    Well, here is the first swallow on the Black Sea. Toothy such. Respect to the military sailors that they did not delay with access to the sea for live firing. The power and determination of our Navy very often cooled different foreign heads.
    Well, and if necessary - these heads were unscrewed.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 22 July 2016 14: 34
      -4
      Quote: Corsair0304
      Well, here is the first swallow on the Black Sea. Toothy such. Respect to the military sailors that they did not delay with access to the sea for live firing. The power and determination of our Navy very often cooled different foreign heads.
      Well, and if necessary - these heads were unscrewed.

      forgot to add "urya" at the end ...
  8. dsm100
    dsm100 22 July 2016 12: 40
    +1
    It’s hard to learn, easy in battle. Well done !!!
    1. avt
      avt 22 July 2016 12: 50
      0
      Quote: dsm100
      It’s hard to learn, easy in battle.

      YES YoYoYoYo! When will you finally write correctly !! ?? IN THE HIKING !!!!
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 22 July 2016 15: 09
        -1
        Quote: avt
        YES YoYoYoYo!

        hussars to be silent !!! lol
  9. Atlant-1164
    Atlant-1164 22 July 2016 12: 47
    +2
    soon from our ships will be crowded with other fleets .. in the Black Sea. as it was before !!
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 22 July 2016 15: 14
      0
      soon from our ships will be crowded with other fleets .. in the Black Sea. as it was before!
      Are you crazy? fool I'm sorry, but there is a limit to any "uryakan"! If you are able to press the keys, you will probably be able to find information about our fleet, and about the fleet of the "potential enemy", I mean the United States and NATO. compare, stick your head under the cold water, and henceforth use your brains (if available) before writing with teenage emissions ...
      1. Atlant-1164
        Atlant-1164 22 July 2016 15: 32
        +2
        I’ll have a request for you .. I don’t have to judge for yourself the world around you .. and still, put your head in cold water .. or under the asphalt paver .. maybe it’s easier. you are our pollutor.
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 22 July 2016 16: 28
          -2
          Quote: Atlant-1164
          I’ll have a request for you .. I don’t judge the world around you by myself.

          if you judge by yourself, my condolences ... You must be relieved, too, "hurray" shout, despite the diarrhea ...
        2. Atlant-1164
          Atlant-1164 22 July 2016 17: 13
          +3
          You’re aware of your rudeness .. and deleted your well-meaning comment. It pleases. So not everything is so bad.
  10. uskrabut
    uskrabut 22 July 2016 14: 47
    +1
    After 25 years of oblivion, it is required not to slow down the pace of updating the World Fleet. And it is painfully often and arrogantly our friends visit us to visit. You look and grafted them with proper modesty.

    true dill in the goiter stuck fat
  11. Paul zewike
    Paul zewike 22 July 2016 15: 21
    +2
    I like this boat. Inexpensive, decently armed, handsome. Not with the cans of battle for him. And against the Turks it looks very good. A good ship, for its tasks, in its place.
  12. Kudrevkn
    Kudrevkn 22 July 2016 19: 41
    0
    That because of the fulfillment of a typical task number 1 on combat training and the entry of the ship into the combat strength of the fleet of constant combat readiness such passions - muzzles flared up on the forum? The "new building" is undergoing a "battle in battle", and the crew needs a 30% premium "for the pennant"! Seven feet under the keel, new sailors - Black Sea men! Good luck, brothers - surface watermen !!!! Well, with regards to the "set" of standard weapons, so for the "motorcycle" is no longer required! It is impossible to "pump" one calf muscle, and not to pump biceps - a kind of dried Schwarzenegger will work? Ass mouth, not "jock"! So for each type (rank) of the ship according to its "work" and a working "tool"!
    1. Yarik
      Yarik 22 July 2016 21: 59
      0
      So, on August 24, 1921, the commander and commissar of the destroyer "Krepky" were forced to note in the order for the ship the "extreme" position with a morning wake-up call. It was already getting to the point that the team did not get up on time even "within the prescribed half hour" (!). The commander was forced to recommend to the awakened warlords * to "wake up their comrades", since there was no orderly post.

      It's impressive. And even- I won't say that Rurik was rubbish. But in the harbor? But by "military men"? Pro-e-bano?