WSJ claims that the aircraft of the VKS of the Russian Federation attacked the American base in Syria

136
American edition Wall Street Journal came out with material claiming that aviation The Russian Aerospace Forces, involved in Syria, dealt a blow to a certain US secret base located on the territory of the SAR. It is noted that this base is used by both American and British troops. At the same time, in Britain, information on the application of the Russian Air Force on the "secret" US base in Syria has not yet been confirmed. Refutations, by the way, were also not received.



The WSJ writes that Russian planes attacked the "secret" US base in Syria about a day after the servicemen who were there left the base. It is assumed that we are talking about an American military facility, located a few kilometers from the border with Jordan. According to statements by the American media, the blow was struck in June.

The Russian Ministry of Defense does not comment on the statements in the American press.

It should be recalled that earlier it was reported about the initiative of the US President regarding the interaction with the Russian Federation on Syria. The principles of possible interaction were voiced by US Secretary of State John Kerry, who flew in with a visit to Moscow and conducted lengthy negotiations with representatives of the Russian leadership. In particular, it was announced that the United States was ready to create a joint focal point in Jordan, with which it would be possible to work more closely together in the implementation of operations against terrorists. Whether Moscow has accepted Obama’s proposal or not is not reported yet.
  • MO RF
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

136 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +45
    22 July 2016 11: 43
    Well, if this base was located on the territory of terrorists, then it may well be. And what did they expect, any unidentified airfield may turn out to be the object of the enemy.
    1. +44
      22 July 2016 11: 45
      If this is true, then ours were a little late, it was necessary to bomb this "secret" base a day earlier. Although, now the Americans will have nowhere to return - it's already good.
      1. +18
        22 July 2016 11: 50
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        If this is true, then ours were a little late, it was necessary to bomb this "secret" base a day earlier.

        Yes ktozh knew that they would dump.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +39
            22 July 2016 11: 56
            After this statement, there is a smart reason to discard: "When we bombed, we did not know that your base was secret!"
            1. +14
              22 July 2016 11: 59
              Quote: umah
              After this statement, there is a smart reason to shave off:

              Something like that.... request
              1. +28
                22 July 2016 12: 53
                a few kilometers from the border with Jordan.
                ... this is knowledge in kilometers ... there actually is 113 km. to the border with Jordan ... and, here is only 35 km to Palmyra. ... the gas pumping station is located there, judging by the map, and there is a notable double runway of 1 km. ... apparently our "politely asked" the "fighters of the coalition for democracy" from there ... very politely ... they gave me 24 hours for reflection and everyone ... who did not run away, we are not to blame ... mattress mats and English gentlemen gave on slippers ... laughing
                1. +1
                  22 July 2016 16: 00
                  Ours have already recognized this fact.
                  http://warfiles.ru/show-124112-moskva-priznala-fakt-udara-po-amerikanskoy-baze-v
                  -sirii.html
                  1. +5
                    22 July 2016 17: 54
                    Russian aerospace forces attacked American base in Syria

                    Watch the magician more closely.
                    Base - Syrian.
                    But what kind of pendos do there is unclear.
                    1. +5
                      22 July 2016 21: 02
                      Quote: Baikal
                      Watch the magician more closely.
                      Base - Syrian.
                      But what kind of pendos do there is unclear.

                      So the invaders, however, are under the banner of fighting for "crap democracy".
              2. +3
                22 July 2016 13: 59
                How can you even carry such nonsense: "cut off your head by mistake." Toner has jelly in his head.
                1. +5
                  22 July 2016 14: 17
                  No jelly. This is a Syrian boy, second grade. Would it be American ...
                2. +13
                  22 July 2016 15: 03
                  Quote: berezin1987
                  "cut off the head by mistake."

                  For some incredible mistake, Toner’s mother didn’t have an abortion at one time. am
                3. 0
                  22 July 2016 21: 26
                  Sometimes it becomes insulting that by mistake the terrorists, oh, moderate opposition, cut off the wrong head! am
                4. The comment was deleted.
                5. +7
                  22 July 2016 23: 02
                  Quote: berezin1987
                  How can you even carry such nonsense: "cut off your head by mistake." Toner has jelly in his head.

                  but it seems to me that Toner has toner in its head.
              3. +1
                22 July 2016 18: 23
                Well, what did I say in the comments on another publication? Here he is a brazen American ram. It’s a pity that it wasn’t this murle who mistakenly cut off his head.
            2. +1
              22 July 2016 12: 01
              Quote: umah
              After this statement, there is a smart reason to discard: "When we bombed, we did not know that your base was secret!"

              So if you believe them, it was a month ago, already shaved off. They answered us through the IOC for this. smile
            3. +6
              22 July 2016 12: 06
              ... Details began to appear of the air strikes that the Russian airborne forces inflicted on the At-Tanf settlement in southern Syria in June. It turns out that the British special forces almost fell under the bombing (maybe it got ..., the British refuse to comment).

              The field camp on which the airstrike was struck was actively used by American and British special forces.
              (C)
              (The Wall Street Journal, "Russian Strikes on Remote Syria Garrison Alarm US")
              Only in the original article is it described as "SAS", "miraculously" blew its legs out of the camp in a day, as the Aerospace Forces hit it.
            4. +23
              22 July 2016 13: 03
              American base in Syria? Did they rent it? Are there any Syrian bases in the USA? Why not? Where are the refugees from the Middle East in the USA? Are they not there? And why?
            5. +1
              22 July 2016 14: 59
              Quote: umah
              there is a great reason to shake it off: "When we bombed, we did not know that your base was secret!"

              And after bombing another razik: "And what for you need it already, because it is declassified" laughing
            6. avt
              +7
              22 July 2016 15: 35
              Quote: umah
              b: "When we bombed, we did not know that your base was secret!"

              No. Well, let's take the matter seriously! Stop joking! I believe that the Russian Foreign Ministry should make an explanation and demand, well, so that in future there will be no misunderstandings, a list of all the secret objects and agents of the USA for their own safety. wassat
              1. 0
                22 July 2016 20: 44
                The Russian Foreign Ministry should make an explanation and demand


                MO already explained a month ago with amers.
                1. +1
                  22 July 2016 23: 55
                  This is the essence of the problem. Americans and Angles are illegally in the territory of a foreign state, they are training the opposition there (probably still not playing golf). And when they come under attack (well-deserved), the Russian Defense Ministry secretly discusses and smooths out the problem. Thanks to Wall StreetJournel for raising this topic.

                  Now imagine a mirror picture and estimate what a howl would be in the Western media and what sanctions would impose on the Russian Federation.

                  Once again, the problem is not that they struck, or even that the Americans were in Syria (this is Syria's internal affair). The problem is that the Russian Federation is still trying to play along with the States. Why was this not said loudly at a Foreign Ministry briefing a month ago? Where is the "blond bitch"? (This is not me, it is she who called herself that).
        2. +6
          22 July 2016 11: 55
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Yes ktozh knew that they would dump.

          It seems that ours were just waiting for this to gouge this base without "partner" losses. smile
        3. 0
          22 July 2016 11: 59
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          If this is true, then ours were a little late, it was necessary to bomb this "secret" base a day earlier.

          Yes ktozh knew that they would dump.

          Who knew what? The base is "secret" ..! laughing
          1. +20
            22 July 2016 12: 07
            Quote: Observer 33
            Who knew what? The base is "secret" ..! laughing

            Only not for us ...
            1. +5
              22 July 2016 12: 53
              Quote: Sid.74
              Only not for us ...

              Are there still doubters? Either the Americans dumped earlier, the British are perplexed, then Erdogan will be washed off in time ... The NATO can not understand hints in any way. Obviously, it is necessary to shorten the time between warning and application ... WORD, TRAIN Slightly ... And then snicker, get fat ...
              As V. Soloviev says, maybe I’ll not tell you exactly, BUT-
              “The Russian bear can be pissed off for a long time, but then it cannot be stopped. Because, unfortunately, not everyone knows that there was not a single war that the Russians lost. Not a battle, but a war. A very large people, and very patient. But when patience runs out ...
              Do not like Russians, if you please, RESPECT. "
              1. +2
                22 July 2016 13: 07
                Quote: AleksUkr
                there was not a single war that the Russians would lose. Not a battle, but a war.

                I hope this is intimidation of the enemy on your part, moreover, an enemy of preschool age who has not yet opened a history textbook?
                To list for a long time, open the textbook and there you can calculate the number of moments in which we were still beaten and even taken away. Then, of course, they returned, well, then, in another war.
                The slogan should also be at least a little thought out by Her Marshal.
                1. 0
                  24 July 2016 17: 28
                  Quote: Velizariy
                  in which they still beat us and even took them away.

                  No need for unfounded statements, write directly, lost this and that war.
              2. +3
                22 July 2016 16: 03
                Quote: AleksUkr
                not everyone knows that there was not a single war that the Russians would lose. Not a battle, but a war.

                Yes, not all. History books do not know this for sure.

                But they know several examples of wars that Russia certainly lost.
                If we discard the times before the beginning of the 18th century, they remain, without a hint: the Russo-Turkish War of 1710-1713, the Crimean War of 1853-564, the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905.
                This is if I have not forgotten anything else.
                1. +1
                  24 July 2016 15: 13
                  In none of the wars listed above did the life of the Russian state stand at stake, but when it did, then they showed everyone that we were going to live for a long time and did not want to die like a people! And yet, do not remind us who opposed us in the Crimean War?
                2. 0
                  24 July 2016 17: 35
                  Quote: murriou
                  This is if I have not forgotten anything else.

                  All these wars can only be considered lost conditionally, Russia has not suffered an unconditional defeat, but has lost under POLITICAL pressure.
                  The Crimean War is when Russia forced the coalition of the strongest empires of the world to retreat, why did you record it in defeat?
            2. +4
              22 July 2016 13: 33
              Quote: Sid.74
              Quote: Observer 33
              Who knew what? The base is "secret" ..! laughing

              Only not for us ...

              And here she is, a new parking lot and three buildings in the center of the SVR laughing
        4. +5
          22 July 2016 12: 18
          Yes ktozh knew that they would dump.


          Is not a fact. It would be necessary to look through the special digests of that time, for obituaries, who allegedly died in "Afghanistan". It's not just about declassification, if an event is not approved by Congress, insurers have the right not to pay money. From that, the one who died, for example in Ukraine, turns out to be two hundredth in Germany. And so, they all end up in Bondsteel, and if the office has its own Albanians, they will know exactly how many striped boxes flew over the Atlantic.
          1. +2
            22 July 2016 17: 51
            Quote: Asadullah
            they all fall into Bondstyle, and if the office has its own Albanians, they will certainly know how many striped boxes flew across the Atlantic.
        5. 0
          22 July 2016 13: 30
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Yes ktozh knew that they would dump.
          And why did they dump? recourse Where did it leak? am
        6. 0
          22 July 2016 20: 39
          Yes ktozh knew that they would dump.


          The day before the strike, 20 of the 24 British intelligence services left the base.
          1. 0
            24 July 2016 15: 20
            How to understand this 20 of the 24 British intelligence services ..))?
            1. 0
              24 July 2016 15: 51
              How to understand this 20 of the 24 British intelligence services ..))?


              In terms of foreheads, I didn’t notice and correct the Google translator error.
        7. 0
          22 July 2016 21: 41
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Yes ktozh knew that they would dump.


          Hi Sasha.
          Done as if by notes. Ours warned our "Western colleagues" that we would be tough and tough. They will be smarter for the future. War is not only and not so much a talking shop, and one must answer for the "bazaar". For the first time, the Americans are faced with a situation where their word is not the main thing. Well, let them get used to it.
        8. 0
          22 July 2016 22: 34
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          If this is true, then ours were a little late, it was necessary to bomb this "secret" base a day earlier.

          Yes ktozh knew that they would dump.



          So maybe it’s leaked? How else did they find out that they need to get out of there?
      2. +11
        22 July 2016 11: 53
        There is a base, but there are no military personnel on it. That is, weapons depots left unprotected. For whom are they left?
        1. 0
          22 July 2016 12: 49
          . For whom are they left?
          so they’re constantly there, “mistakes”, then the ammunition will be thrown in the wrong place, then they will prepare the wrong ones and everything is secret.
        2. +1
          22 July 2016 12: 57
          Quote: Mahmut
          For whom are they left?


          Probably all stolen and sold, and now there is an opportunity to blame on Putin ....
          1. 0
            24 July 2016 15: 24
            Or maybe they wanted to leave the moderates, but ours found out ... well, they did, and it’s good for us, and the Amers don’t hurt, and Assad is pleased! Although ... The Amers would not hurt to do it, but they’ll be there, oh, oh !!!
        3. 0
          24 July 2016 15: 22
          As you can see, it didn’t "flow under the bridge" at all, maybe, on the contrary, it "flowed in" once and the grandmothers were not allowed to take weapons, and without the scandal of the "allies", it was all right!
      3. +1
        22 July 2016 12: 05
        Secret base, so secret ... was.
        1. +1
          22 July 2016 12: 32
          Quote: lelikas
          Secret base, so secret ... was.

          This is a secret for you and me, and for the relevant services it’s the coordinates that you had to erase from the map long ago, which was done without noise and dust.
          1. +3
            22 July 2016 18: 01
            Quote: NEXUS
            these are the coordinates that had long been erased from the map, which was done without noise and dust.

            Alas, "no noise and dust" did not work!
            VKS, Long-range aviation, well, you understand!
          2. 0
            22 July 2016 20: 51
            for us it’s secret, and for the relevant services these are the coordinates that had to be wiped off the map for a long time


            The Wall Street Journal said Thursday that a Russian strike on a CIA-related base was part of a Russian campaign to put pressure on the White House to negotiate closer cooperation in the Syrian sky, US military and intelligence officials said.
      4. -2
        22 July 2016 17: 54
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        If it's true

        laughing laughing laughing What do you really believe ??? Why only such stuffing "shit on the fan", to provoke people?
      5. 0
        22 July 2016 18: 37
        Quote: SRC P-15
        If this is true, then ours were a little late, it was necessary to bomb this "secret" base a day earlier. Although, now the Americans will have nowhere to return - it's already good.

        Mattress makers drink godlessly, then imagines, but drunk.
    2. -1
      22 July 2016 11: 46
      If this is true then squeeze them anyway.
    3. 0
      22 July 2016 11: 48
      This is all because of the fact that we are warning them in a day. We don’t need to warn them and the losses among terrorists will be many times greater
      1. 0
        22 July 2016 11: 50
        Quote: vkl.47
        This is all because of the fact that we are warning them in a day.

        Who said?
    4. +7
      22 July 2016 12: 01
      Quote: Wend
      Well, if this base was located on the territory of terrorists, then it may well be. And what did they expect, any unidentified airfield may turn out to be the object of the enemy.

      Anatoly, there is a duplication of materials, only under different "sauce". This is the same story when the Aerospace Forces allegedly smashed to pieces the base of the "moderate", pocket terrorists of the United States, located on the border with Jordan. It was early June ...
      1. 0
        22 July 2016 12: 11
        Quote: Andrey K
        Anatoly, there is a duplication of materials, only under different "sauce". This is the same story when the Aerospace Forces allegedly smashed the base of "moderate", pocket US terrorists to pieces

        Nope, this news from July 21 ....http://www.wsj.com/articles/russian-strikes-on-remote-syria-garrison-alarm-u-s-1
        469137231
        1. +6
          22 July 2016 12: 35
          Quote: Sid.74
          ... Nope, this news is July 21 ...

          Colleague, I am pointing to this "news". True "news" is a bit stale ...
          In it, once again, the "incident" of early June 2016 is chewed and digested, with the bombing of our Aerospace Forces, a terrorist camp on the border with Jordan hi
          I will not retell it, read ...
          The beginning of the original article is as follows:
          "When Russian aircraft bombed a remote garrison in southeastern Syria last month, an alarm went off at the Pentagon and Defense Department in London ..." hi
          1. +2
            22 July 2016 15: 23
            Quote: Andrey K
            Colleague, I am pointing to this "news". True "news" is a bit stale ...

            Yes ... that's right ... the news turned out to be old, but then it was called a fake, and besides "Veteran Today" no one voiced it, and this news was not confirmed by officials ...
            Now she has played with absolutely wonderful colors.
            Dmitry Peskov, answering the question about the airstrike on the American base, asked the representative of the Ministry of Defense to ask this question, since he does not know.
            In turn, Interfax, citing its own source, said that the incident had long been settled. The Russian side gave all the explanations at a video conference between the Russian and American military.

            At the meeting, the military concluded that the reason for the air strike was the refusal of the Americans to provide information about their actions. The United States did not indicate this object among the districts where the opposition loyal to it is operating, observing the armistice regime. There, at the meeting, the Americans recognized that the Russian military had warned the international coalition in advance about the preparation of air strikes in the area.
            laughing

            The blow of VKS of Russia on a secret base occurred on June 16. The US and UK forces help maintain the status quo of the so-called buffer zone in Jordan.

            The personnel stationed at the base, according to The Wall Street Journal, helps protect Jordan from ISIS terrorists penetrating from Syria. For this, they regularly invade Syrian territory.

            That is why that night nobody was at the base. About a day before the air strike from 20 to 24, the British left the base. The Americans also spotted a plane of the Russian VKS on the way to the base. The plane allegedly dropped a cluster bomb. So say US representatives and the so-called. moderate opposition.

            After the first strike, the US Central Command in Qatar contacted the headquarters of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria in Lattakia and reported on the inadmissibility of attacks from this base.

            However, the Russian Aerospace Forces struck another blow about an hour and a half later after the bell. The Russian pilot did not respond to inquiries of the US military on the frequencies that were intended to communicate Russian and American pilots in the sky.

            As a result of the airstrike, at least four "insurgents" were killed.

            None of the Britons and Americans were injured and four "rebels" were killed ... request... Lose it, no! laughing
            1. +5
              22 July 2016 23: 01
              Quote: Sid.74
              None of the Britons and Americans were injured and four "rebels" were killed ... request... Lose it, no! laughing

              Well here are the goodies laughing
              Good luck to you hi
    5. +1
      22 July 2016 13: 44
      Aviation is always off the ground. To do this, there are avionavodchiki.
    6. +1
      25 July 2016 07: 23
      Now it's not a secret ... and not a base at all .. drinks
  2. +8
    22 July 2016 11: 45
    Nefig classified their bases ...
    1. +3
      22 July 2016 13: 04
      Well, they should not have been there at all; the Syrian government did not call them there. Let them say thanks for letting go
    2. 0
      22 July 2016 13: 04
      Well, they should not have been there at all; the Syrian government did not call them there. Let them say thanks for letting go
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +3
      22 July 2016 13: 35
      Quote: Abbra
      Nefig classified their bases ...

      We were wrong request
  3. 0
    22 July 2016 11: 49
    Those. struck a piece of terrain on which there is no one? The base was turned off and left, but the strike on the "base" ... how is it? WSJ tries to make a scandal from scratch ...
  4. +2
    22 July 2016 11: 49
    dealt a blow to some secret US base located on the territory of the SAR

    declassified ours)
  5. +4
    22 July 2016 11: 51
    Americans: We there unloaded weapons for moderate terrorists a day ago and left, and the Russians flew in and bombed ...
  6. +10
    22 July 2016 11: 51
    And these same WSJ did not bother to explain to readers on what basis the United States built a base on the territory of a sovereign state without his consent?
    1. +1
      22 July 2016 11: 59
      Quote: Wiruz
      And these same WSJ did not bother to explain to readers on what basis the United States built a base on the territory of a sovereign state without his consent?
      In these very WSJs work "people who look like people" (S. Klevtsov).
  7. +7
    22 July 2016 11: 53
    It means that the Americans left the equipped and packed base for the Barmaleys. And therefore not bad!
    1. 0
      22 July 2016 12: 06
      Compare cute Barmalei with these undead. NOT GOOD! wink
      1. 0
        22 July 2016 12: 42
        In "Aibolit 66" Barmaley (Bykov) is generally charming! Together with their "accomplices" - a group of kindergarten teachers.
    2. 0
      22 July 2016 12: 32
      Right! Now there is no where the bearded little heads violent to lean. The owners tried in vain! winked
  8. +1
    22 July 2016 11: 54
    As far as I understand from the original source we are talking about June 2016 ...
    1. 0
      22 July 2016 12: 51
      As far as I understood from the original source, we are talking about June 2016 ... ,,
      so their triebalt (normal inhabitants of the Baltic states, please do not worry. this does not concern you.) they bit, they began to slow down, it only took a month.
  9. +1
    22 July 2016 11: 59
    it is alleged that the air force of the Russian aerospace forces engaged in Syria, struck at a secret US base located on the territory of the SAR

    And who is to blame for the amers? it was necessary to share secrets, and in general it is interesting, what is this secret base in the location of the basmachi ??? And since only the media report this, the cat knows whose meat has eaten.
  10. +3
    22 July 2016 12: 02
    it is a pity if this is not true ... but if it is true - Russia has once again shown that it has the most inaccurate weapon in the world, therefore we apologize in advance if "accidentally" we get "in the wrong place" request

    The great Russian actor and poet Leonid Filatov wrote a beautiful fairy tale, which also reveals the Russian mentality, without knowing how brilliant his work is. For example, a quote, if you look at it from a different angle, adding a heading

    "Monologue of the Russian rocket"

    Well, by chance, well, joking,
    Strayed from the right path!
    Duck, I’m a child of nature,
    Let it be evil, but a child!
  11. +2
    22 July 2016 12: 04
    Oh, sorry, it happened !!!
    1. 0
      22 July 2016 12: 45
      No, "we screwed up, sorry!" - the favorite excuse of the Yankees after any jamb, so take it into service.
  12. 0
    22 July 2016 12: 08
    The article is uninformative, so you can read more here
    http://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2016/07/22/650209-vks-sirii-britanskii
    -amerikanskii-spetsnaz

    entertaining reading, however there .. it turns out for the bombing of terrorists in Syria we still have to ask Jordanians ... belay
  13. +1
    22 July 2016 12: 08
    I wonder how Americans understand Syria’s cooperation and coordination? That is, we must warn them about attacks on barmales and their points, but they don’t have any information about their super secret bases? Well then, I'm sorry ...
  14. 0
    22 July 2016 12: 09
    So the base is secret, but we did not know about it. There were bandits, we have nothing to do with it. That would come up with a rocket that induces hatred in thoughts. Then, from behind the heap, hundreds of installations and the khan of the bandits fired in one gulp. soldier
  15. 0
    22 July 2016 12: 12
    The Russian aerospace forces attacked the secret base of the Wall Street Journal a day after the last correspondent of this publication left it. laughing
  16. 0
    22 July 2016 12: 13
    It’s a bad thing to keep secret since they are being bombed, they themselves are to blame, and maybe there American terrorists trained against Assad, it’s a pity that they were not covered with mattresses
  17. +1
    22 July 2016 12: 14
    VKS work and all went to ...
  18. Riv
    0
    22 July 2016 12: 28
    If the base were not secret, no one would touch it. Now who to complain to?
  19. +10
    22 July 2016 12: 30
    one two three five ten .. quit looking.)
  20. 0
    22 July 2016 12: 40
    But the nefik was her secret to do ... how do we know..whose she .... She is secret!
  21. 0
    22 July 2016 12: 45
    According to them ???? - I permit !!!!
  22. +4
    22 July 2016 12: 45
    Russian Aerospace Forces is not an Olympic team. You can’t help VADA and USADA here. am
  23. +1
    22 July 2016 12: 45
    This is not news, this is not the destruction of something important there, this is a warning. The Americans are still showing off and do not want to coordinate their actions with us, and also do not want to share information. This operation, in my opinion, served as an example of the fact that Russia in such circumstances will act exclusively at its discretion. And if the elite units of Western countries begin to fall under the distribution, then formally Russia will not be held responsible for this.
    If the Americans continue to consider themselves to be the main ones in Syria, then they, the British, French and Germans will have to say goodbye to their special forces. Gauges for a day are not late.
  24. +1
    22 July 2016 12: 47
    How does the WSJ know everything? There were no complaints from Assad. Moderate too. This means that the "base" either spilled oil or traded in weapons. If the WSJ has a stake, then let the UN write that business is being destroyed by aggressors. Not only do they eat meldonium on Putin's orders, they also hit businesses.
  25. 0
    22 July 2016 12: 54
    Oh how. For the time being, we are hitting it physically. Interestingly, this can be attributed to one of the areas of modern warfare? Type did not climb, otherwise it will kill? To be honest, to be honest.
  26. 0
    22 July 2016 12: 58
    the American edition of the Wall Street Journal came out with material claiming that the Russian aerospace forces operating in Syria struck a certain US secret base located on the territory of the SAR.
    Disguised too well ...
  27. 0
    22 July 2016 13: 12
    So, since the fall of last year, we have only been doing their bases at striking blows (only their personnel is kind of bearded ... probably, such camouflage requirements).
    Star-striped uncles caught on late.
  28. 0
    22 July 2016 13: 18
    If so, then it's time.
  29. 0
    22 July 2016 13: 19
    And who gave the right to create this base in Syria, not Assad himself? lol well, if it’s illegal then there’s nothing to do in Syria, it’s right that they bombed good
  30. +1
    22 July 2016 13: 20
    Well, it’s not a secret good
  31. +1
    22 July 2016 13: 37
    Well, today is the day of real news: if the truth is with the secret base, I hope there were also American advisers and all kinds of remarks there.
    The Poles butted with their brothers, adopted the law on genocide and immediately the question - how will these ideological serve together in common battalions with the OUN and forest brothers (Shapito is resting)
    The Turks are hooked with Europe and the states about their intermarriage - just a gift for us, they will at least lag behind us with their teachings.
    In general - keep it up!
  32. +2
    22 July 2016 13: 42
    And what’s the problem? The Americans are illegally on the territory of Syria i.e. are gangs, and for such purposes, the Air Forces of the Russian Federation are just working. Everything is logical.
  33. +1
    22 July 2016 14: 03
    That's exactly what you need to understand. An American base in Syria? The State Department is not recognized for anything in life. You can safely bomb. And if they admit, then the congressional hearings and the UN proceedings on the fact of aggression against Syria.
  34. +1
    22 July 2016 14: 07
    But in more detail

    According to sources in the US and two commanders of the Syrian rebels, Russian planes dropped cluster munitions at the facility. About 20 British troops stationed at the base managed to leave the base at At-Tanf 24 hours before the incident.

    After the airstrike, US Central Command in Qatar contacted Russian counterparts in Syrian Latakia and warned that the base was involved in the US campaign and should not be attacked. Nevertheless, approximately 90 minutes after this, an American plane nearby was recorded a new wave of airstrikes.
    1. +1
      22 July 2016 16: 25
      It was an answer for our turntable that was shot down, according to V.V. Pyakin, the Americans were piled on, and not only, be healthy and not all, officially, they’ll go to the cemetery too much.
  35. +3
    22 July 2016 14: 11
    and even if so, this secret base, well, it means no one’s, or terrorists, but there’s no third, so all one set-off is unique ...
  36. +1
    22 July 2016 14: 21
    Quote: Yuyuka
    it is a pity if this is not true ... but if it is true - Russia has once again shown that it has the most inaccurate weapon in the world, therefore we apologize in advance if "accidentally" we get "in the wrong place" request

    The great Russian actor and poet Leonid Filatov wrote a beautiful fairy tale, which also reveals the Russian mentality, without knowing how brilliant his work is. For example, a quote, if you look at it from a different angle, adding a heading

    "Monologue of the Russian rocket"

    Well, by chance, well, joking,
    Strayed from the right path!
    Duck, I’m a child of nature,
    Let it be evil, but a child!

    Only a child of nature needs to be replaced by a child of Russia
    1. +1
      22 July 2016 16: 03
      Only a child of nature needs to be replaced by a child of Russia

      It is possible to sue Russia, but the nature ?? .. request will only laugh feel
  37. 0
    22 July 2016 14: 22
    we pass by, just another informational stuffing in order to fill up newspaper pages so that people would not be indignant why there are no articles about the death of hundreds of civilians as a result of the bombing by the "coalition" ...
  38. +1
    22 July 2016 14: 34
    You can strike at any object that has not joined the armistice plan. How many times have they been offered coordination with ISIS. No, no and NO. Well, no, and no trial.
  39. +2
    22 July 2016 14: 48
    It’s not the Russian VKS that struck the base! -A Latvian eagles, I saw it myself! Pleased. soldier
  40. 0
    22 July 2016 14: 51
    "Was there a boy" ??? !!! Another stupid provocation.
  41. +1
    22 July 2016 14: 59
    What are such bases on the territory of Syria? Who called them there?
  42. +1
    22 July 2016 15: 33
    Just like little children ... The base is SECRET ... There are no coalition flags, there is a base (suddenly) in Syria. How can our soldiers know that there are partners ?! Purely logically - these "bearded men" have built a base with blackjack and whores, and this is not correct. So they began to change the terrain.
  43. +1
    22 July 2016 15: 43
    Good shuganuli
  44. 0
    22 July 2016 15: 59
    Something is wrong here ... They bombed the "secret base" already in June and none of the Amers and the British even blamed? Yes, this has never happened in nature. It would have been a long time since tubs of dirt poured on us ... And only today did the journalists seem to have sniffed out? It can be seen an "ambush" is being prepared ...
    1. 0
      24 July 2016 16: 54
      Quote: russmensch
      and none of the amers and the British did not even blather?

      And who, striped, gave permission to build a base in the ATS ?? If there is no base, then there is nothing to complain about.
  45. +1
    22 July 2016 16: 07
    Even if this is so (and most likely, this base was "in the wrong place"), then after the fight they do not wave their fists. Everything must be done on time.
  46. 0
    22 July 2016 16: 11
    Good stuffing for the liberals! Now in comments on ECHO MOSCOW there is such a stench, stench, hatred of the Russian Air Force and the whole of Russia! They are reptiles, they are always designed for such stuffing!
  47. +2
    22 July 2016 17: 18
    what And our rocket can go astray and get into the building where WADA representatives sit? To the heap ...
    1. +2
      22 July 2016 18: 12
      And our rocket can go astray and get into the building where WADA representatives sit? To the heap ...

      all the will of God feel let's pray, brothers ... winked
  48. +1
    22 July 2016 18: 31
    Ours were bombed in June, and they remembered only now. Well, stupid! (with)
  49. +2
    22 July 2016 18: 57
    If this information is duck, then it is very unfortunate. And if true, then let the IOC and meldonium complain to them to help.
  50. +2
    22 July 2016 18: 58
    And how else to make the Americans sit at the negotiating table? Now the mosaic began to take shape, why Kerry flew to Moscow. Now this case will be classified and we will never know the truth whether it was or not.
  51. 0
    22 July 2016 20: 50
    And we didn’t even know that this was their base. She's SECRET bully
  52. -1
    22 July 2016 22: 56
    It is indecent for the American side to build various vegetable and secret bases on foreign territory without the permission of local authorities. They violated the order and got a purge. Never mind, next time they will be smarter, they will ask, “exceptional” ones, and leave them completely.
  53. +1
    23 July 2016 04: 50
    Now it’s clear why the West sets up its bases there. So that terrorists can hide there under the cover of the West. Artists.
  54. Mwg
    0
    23 July 2016 08: 09
    Why is the word P.I.N.D.O.S.Y. moderator deletes? Is this considered an offensive word? After all, translated into Russian it means “penguins” and this word is used only for the military?
    I wanted to feel sorry for them, to write: “poor, poor.....”, but they cut off my word. You can't call them that, right? I didn't know...
    Now everyone will slowly begin to pinch them))) That’s why they are poor))))
    1. 0
      23 July 2016 09: 08
      I really like this particular episode. Maybe a joke.
      At one of the meetings, the commander of the Russian peacekeepers in Kosovo, General Evtukhovich, said: “Comrade officers, I ask you not to call the Pindos “Pindos,” they are very offended by this.”

      In another version it was “I ask you not to call Pindos “Pindos”, because Pindos are very offended by this”

      Source: http://politikus.ru/articles/34937-pochemu-amerikancev-zovut-pindosami.html
      Politikus.ru

      I can only add that the nickname stuck forever. I had a conversation with one Amer. Former military. How he jumped up when he heard this word... And he understood without translation :-)
  55. 0
    23 July 2016 09: 27
    why not to a disguised spare white house? after all, he exists somewhere
  56. +1
    23 July 2016 10: 10
    “WSJ writes that Russian planes attacked a “secret” US base in Syria about a day after the military personnel stationed there left the base.”

    Eh, we're late...
  57. 0
    23 July 2016 10: 10
    Quote: Wend
    Well, if this base was located on the territory of terrorists, then it may well be. And what did they expect, any unidentified airfield may turn out to be the object of the enemy.


    Well, we were a little wrong. Sorry, we're Americans... wassat
  58. +2
    23 July 2016 11: 39
    WSJ claims that the aircraft of the VKS of the Russian Federation attacked the American base in Syria
    As many here in RUSSIA will say: “That’s how we should have started”...
  59. 0
    24 July 2016 13: 44
    The Russian Ministry of Defense does not comment on statements in the American press.©

    The Ministry of Defense responded to statements about a “VKS strike” on a Western special forces base in Syria
    23 July 2016, 19: 01
    The official representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense, Major General Igor Konashenkov, commented on the publication of The Wall Street Journal, which alleged that the Russian Aerospace Forces allegedly attacked a secret US and British special forces base in Syria.
    “Responsibility for the fact that military personnel of special units of the anti-ISIS coalition countries located in Syria are exposed to the threat of ending up in areas where Russian Aerospace Forces aircraft are used lies solely with their military leadership. We constantly and through all available channels call on our partners to provide information about the location of the “moderate opposition” units under their control,” the general explained.

    The Ministry of Defense emphasized that in response to such calls in Moscow, after the fact, they hear reproaches and accusations that the Russian Aerospace Forces “should not have” launched strikes on some areas or targets.

    “Even after the attack on a militant training camp in the At-Tanf region in June, our American colleagues heard the phrase: “Don’t hit where you just hit!” Moreover, judging by an article in The Wall Street Journal, before launching strikes, our pilots are asked to guess from a height of several kilometers the presence of Western special forces among the militants using “blocking sandbags characteristic of American and British bases,” Konashenkov noted.

    “We are convinced that there is a simpler way to solve problems: our partners move from words to deeds and begin joint actions against international terrorist groups in Syria. Only in this case will it be possible to avoid the repetition of such incidents and not endanger our military personnel performing tasks to combat terrorists on Syrian soil,” the Russian Ministry of Defense said in a commentary.

    Earlier, The Wall Street Journal, citing sources in the Pentagon and the White House, reported that on June 16, Russian warplanes allegedly attacked a secret base of elite British and American troops in the village of At-Tanf.
    Source: RIA Novosti, R.T.
  60. 0
    24 July 2016 16: 52
    What kind of secret base is on the territory of a sovereign state?? They bombed and okay. Next time they will warn where they illegally located the base and ask to legalize it at least temporarily.
  61. 0
    24 July 2016 18: 06
    mourns for his barracks)))
  62. +1
    24 July 2016 18: 31
    The game is very simple - we bombed ISIS, in response the US bombed Syrian civilians, in response ours bombed a US special forces base. It's time for the USA
  63. +1
    24 July 2016 19: 11
    Some of the site's marshals will be unhappy, BUT THEY DID THE RIGHT WAY - FROM A HEIGHT OF 5 YOU CAN'T SEE WHAT KIND OF GO... BELOW. And they're bombing everyone.... Well done.
  64. 0
    24 July 2016 20: 58
    [quote=igorka357]! And yet, can you remind us who opposed us in the Crimean War?

    Reply Our kind French, English, Turks.
  65. 0
    24 July 2016 21: 39
    American base in Syria?! And what, excuse the bald guy, was she doing there?!? Prepared terrorists?! Well, in that case, they did the right thing by bombing!!!
  66. 0
    25 July 2016 09: 35
    1) Why are the ground forces of the United States and other countries there? According to international law, this is not legal => you can wet it because they shouldn’t be there, whoever didn’t hide is not our fault.
    2) Let them give the exact coordinates of the location of their military personnel and the bases of the “moderates”

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"