Military Review

For the 1 semester, the Russian fleet received a patrol ship and around the 50 "Caliber"

35
During the 6 months of 2016, the Russian fleet received the frigate “Admiral Essen”, about fifty Caliber missiles and a radar station, RIA News a message from the chief of the arsenal of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces Anatoly Gulyayev



"For the Navy fleet accepted: Project 11356 escort ship Admiral Essen, Gamma-S1M radar, 72 anti-aircraft guided missiles, 47 Caliber ship’s missiles,
Gulyaev said at the Unified Day of Acceptance of Military Products.

He recalled that “in May, another submarine of the 636 Kolpino project and the icebreaker of the 21180 project Ilya Muromets took place on board the Admiralty Shipyards.”

“For the first time in 45 years, a vessel of this class is under construction. Upon completion of construction and testing, the icebreaker will be part of the Northern Fleet to support the Arctic group of forces, ”said Gulyaev.

The commander of the 128 th brigade of surface ships of the Suflobov Baltic Fleet, in turn, reported that the Admiral Essen, accepted into the June 7 fleet, "successfully passed all kinds of tests in the Baltic and Northern fleets."

“During the tests, a comprehensive check was carried out on the weapons and military equipment of the ship as a whole in real sea conditions. The test results confirmed the compliance of the tactical and technical elements and the characteristics of the ship with the approved technical design, ”he noted.

Now the ship is preparing for the inter-fleet passage to the place of permanent deployment in Sevastopol.
Photos used:
http://sdelanounas.ru
35 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Wiruz
    Wiruz 16 July 2016 11: 04
    +3
    In vain, of course, they disclose information about the number of cruise missiles received by the troops. Do not find?
    1. Lemon1972
      Lemon1972 16 July 2016 11: 07
      +1
      Yeah. You can not give specific numbers. These are not nuclear missiles. As much as we want, we do as much.
    2. Dart2027
      Dart2027 16 July 2016 11: 18
      +1
      Let them know.
      If I knew that the Russians really have so many tanks ... I probably would not have started this war.
      Adolf Gitler.
      1. Khariton
        Khariton 16 July 2016 11: 31
        0
        about fifty Caliber rockets and a radar station,

        This is official, but how much is classified ... We know how to "get poor" in Russia ... bully
      2. Monarchist
        Monarchist 16 July 2016 12: 09
        +1
        Intelligence did not inform the Fuhrer: ".. that the Russians really have such a number of tanks .." so our military department informs "well-wishers", so that "tail to nose". The construction of such a ship as "Essen" in our time is not hidden, and the emergence of a new radar will not hide. Is it not worth reporting on the number of "calibers". If I'm wrong, gurus like "bongo" will correct me
    3. Tusv
      Tusv 16 July 2016 11: 30
      -1
      Quote: Wiruz
      In vain, of course, they disclose information about the number of cruise missiles received by the troops. Do not find?

      Probably the enemy should know about them, so as not to do anything stupid again. After all, the stupidity of the West always costs us incredibly expensive
    4. Pitot
      Pitot 16 July 2016 12: 05
      0
      Or maybe this disinformation?
      1. jjj
        jjj 16 July 2016 12: 19
        +2
        Once Nikita Sergeyevich said in the heat of the moment that in the USSR rockets are produced on a conveyor belt like sausages. The West believed him. I began to agree
        1. Tektor
          Tektor 16 July 2016 13: 04
          +1
          This is not a disinformation, kmk, they just do not tell the whole truth ... In addition to the Caliber, other KRs are also produced ...
    5. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 16 July 2016 19: 21
      0
      Quote: Wiruz
      In vain, of course, they disclose information about the number of cruise missiles received by the troops. Do not find?

      generally in vain ... already busting with open information.
  2. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 16 July 2016 11: 07
    0
    And who said they disclosed?
  3. cost 75
    cost 75 16 July 2016 11: 10
    +3
    Not enough calibers
    1. creak
      creak 16 July 2016 11: 17
      +4
      Quote: kos 75
      Not enough calibers


      Do you know exactly what is not enough - do you know the need of the RF Armed Forces in Caliber? Well ... Well, a lot or a little - a relative concept, everything is known in comparison. For example, three hairs on the head is not enough, and three hairs in the soup is much ... yes
      1. cost 75
        cost 75 16 July 2016 11: 58
        +4
        50 for half a year is 100 per year or 1000 for 10 years. Do you think such rates are normal? So we catch up with the probable enemy in 70 years
        1. BastaKarapuzik And
          BastaKarapuzik And 16 July 2016 13: 31
          +1
          These rockets and launcher come from the 90s. It was then that they were shown at an arms exhibition. It probably took time to organize production, complicated by the collapse of the USSR, but they managed to develop projects and build a certain number of carrier ships specifically for this type of ammunition. Does everyone know how long it takes from a project to transferring a ship to the fleet?
          That is, a quarter of a century, approximately (+/-), they are already being produced with varying intensity.
          Here at Wiki, at the end of the article, there is information on carrier ships:

          https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B1%D1%80_(%D0%BA%D1%80
          %D1%8B%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8B)

          As you can see, the list is not that small. So the "Calibers" themselves with a margin. What is the shelf life of these missiles, I don’t know, but it’s not infinite. They should spend it on exercises, according to ISIS they released a three-month production presumably, the fleet does not experience a shortage of these missiles.

          Everything is strictly my opinion. Thank you for the attention.
      2. Alex_Tug
        Alex_Tug 16 July 2016 14: 08
        +1
        Do you know the need of the RF Armed Forces in Caliber?

        How many released them in Syria? I will not count now - 30 pieces will be typed.
    2. sichevik
      sichevik 16 July 2016 12: 00
      +1
      Quote: kos 75
      Not enough calibers

      And it seems to me that such an amount has been voiced on purpose. In fact, there are much more calibers. Which, sorry for the expression, do cancer will voice the true amount of its ammunition.
      1. I doubt it
        I doubt it 16 July 2016 12: 08
        +2
        "In fact, there are much more calibers."

        I'd like you to be right.
        But I doubt it ...
  4. Olegater
    Olegater 16 July 2016 11: 15
    +2
    “For the Navy, the following have been adopted: Project 11356 Admiral Essen patrol ship, Gamma-S1M radar station, 72 anti-aircraft guided missiles, 47 Kalibr ship missiles; in May, another submarine was launched at the Admiralty Shipyards. boats of project 636 "Kolpino" and icebreaker of project 21180 "Ilya Muromets" "
    Recently, this news has been very encouraging and there is a hope that not everything is as bad as during the time of the squinting drunk and labeled w.d.o.d. I understand that the marine component of defense (ships, submarines) is very complex, and in the modern world it’s still high-tech, and you won’t do it, and this is the time (which we unfortunately have little or not at all), but I really want to if there was more of this technique and it was run by professionals. Moreover, strong enemies are naval (lice, naglia) and they did not destroy their army there, as we did in the 90s and, accordingly, developed and saved up equipment.
  5. Olegater
    Olegater 16 July 2016 11: 30
    +1
    Minuser, seem that I said this wrong?
    1. Khariton
      Khariton 16 July 2016 11: 38
      +1
      Quote: Olegater
      Minuser, seem that I said this wrong?

      Never mind...! Now this is in the order of things on the site .. The gang is working! hi
    2. Alex_Tug
      Alex_Tug 16 July 2016 14: 14
      +1
      I don’t understand. Explain what is the use of + or -? They are like a pole for me.
  6. I doubt it
    I doubt it 16 July 2016 11: 38
    +3
    The news is worthy of the Ukrainian Navy, not Russia.
    72 missiles, what? "Strela-M", or "Needle".
    They would also call the number of received ROPV, cartridges and saved vests. They would have kept quiet, since there’s nothing to brag about.
    72 missiles should be produced per day, 47 "Calibers" - per month, patrol - at five.
    And then in half a year.
    The USA introduces the Zamwolts and Jarald Ford, and we are the patrol! Decent answer, you won’t say anything.

    Oh yes Poo ... Pushkin, oh yes "son of a bitch"!
  7. Olegater
    Olegater 16 July 2016 12: 05
    +2
    Dear forum users !!!!!
    My comments boil down to the fact that in the modern world it is very important for the Russian Defense Ministry to obtain high-precision, technological, modern weapons capable of overcoming all the lines and defenses of the enemy. And this weapon requires time, time and again time for its release (invention, creation of a prototype, elimination of deficiencies, testing, adoption for service and establishment of mass production - an approximate cycle). At the expense of the minuses, if YOU don't like something, write it down and we can discuss how to say in a dispute the truth is born. Understand that riveting "simple" pieces will not solve the defense issue. The simpler the weapon, the easier it is to defend against this weapon and the number does not matter. (Please do not evaluate this comment)
    1. Khariton
      Khariton 16 July 2016 12: 33
      -1
      Quote: Olegater
      Dear forum users !!!!!
      My comments boil down to the fact that in the modern world it is very important for the Russian Defense Ministry to obtain high-precision, technological, modern weapons capable of overcoming all the lines and defenses of the enemy. And this weapon requires time, time and time again for its release (making a prototype, eliminating deficiencies, testing, adopting and setting up mass production - an approximate cycle). At the expense of the minuses, if YOU don't like something, write it down and we can discuss how to say in a dispute the truth is born. Understand that riveting "simple" pieces will not solve the defense issue. The simpler the weapon, the easier it is to defend against this weapon and the number does not matter. (Please do not evaluate this comment)

      Yes, we understood, we understood for a long time ...)))) Thank you for opening your eyes to us ... laughing I probably minus ..! bully Freak!
      1. Olegater
        Olegater 16 July 2016 12: 38
        +1
        Freak! Himself such laughing
  8. Dimon19661
    Dimon19661 16 July 2016 12: 32
    +3
    Are you going to launch missiles like a machine gun to shoot? Or do you think that besides the 3M-54 ships are no longer armed with anything? For example, I am much more concerned about the complete disruption of the shipbuilding program.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 16 July 2016 12: 47
      +5
      For example, I am much more concerned about the complete disruption of the shipbuilding program.

      Local Urya-patriots are of little concern. You stuff the word "Caliber-NK" into the article and that's it - the crowd rejoices. But the fact that surface ships, under these very Calibers, are building at a critically low rate - does not bother at all. How many times was the commissioning of the same Gorshkoy postponed? But nothing, by the end of 2016 (with God's help) it will be handed over to the fleet - there will be a flurry of comments in the style of "Hurray! Army and Navy! America tremble!" wassat
  9. Warrior-80
    Warrior-80 16 July 2016 12: 43
    +1
    Well, this year is 50, the system will work better, they will automate next year 100
  10. weksha50
    weksha50 16 July 2016 13: 37
    +1
    "Now the ship is preparing for the inter-naval transition to the place of permanent deployment in Sevastopol"...

    Well, and ... with a visit to the Mediterranean Sea ...
    And then in the next article, many were upset that a missile boat "Ivanovets" was sent to Mediterranean ...
  11. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 16 July 2016 13: 57
    +1
    Not "in 6 months", but "in the first half of the year", otherwise it turns out that every six months we do a frigate.
  12. ilya_oz
    ilya_oz 16 July 2016 14: 28
    +2
    Not enough rockets? On one day of the war, after all (
  13. Franciscan
    Franciscan 16 July 2016 14: 32
    +3
    Thousands of these calibers are needed already yesterday, but what is 60 pieces in half a year? on two volleys of small and all.
  14. Veteran
    Veteran 16 July 2016 21: 21
    +4
    The fleet has already fired 48 Caliber TFRs against the black and green shaitans.
  15. BastaKarapuzik And
    BastaKarapuzik And 17 July 2016 11: 44
    0
    Well, besides calibers, there are Onyx and Uranus, not to mention Mosquitoes and others. And to this day, nightmarish, for any adversary Volcanoes? This is certainly not a massive weapon, but very weighty.
    As for the carriers, there are not enough ships, a distant sea zone we will not soon wring out from the Americans. But we, in general, do not always need it, but we will cover the coast with aviation and there are coastal anti-ship complexes, the same Ball and Bastion.
    Even with the advantage in conventional weapons that NATO now has, a direct military clash will be suicidal for both sides, but the presence of nuclear weapons reduces the chance of survival in general to zero.
    There are not enough ships, but what you wanted, you allowed the collapse of the country, with your own hands, you can say they destroyed it.
    Now we have to connect these lands. Big job.
  16. Todessichel
    Todessichel 17 July 2016 12: 52
    +1
    47 missiles ....
    47 missiles in half a year.
    On the day of the fighting ...
    Half a year ....