Military Review

Defense Ministry denies media reports about the creation of a "space bomber" in Russia

85
The information that appeared in the media, with reference to Alexei Solodovnikov, a teacher at the Serpukhov branch of the Academy of the Strategic Missile Forces, about the “strategic bomber developed in the Russian Federation capable of performing tasks in space” does not correspond to reality, TASS the content of the denial received yesterday from the military department.




The ministry noted that the media misinterpreted the words of a university representative about the alleged development of a “space bomber”.

“The development of promising engines for space exploration has been continuously conducted in Russia since the middle of the last century. However, there can be no talk of creating "space bombers" in the Serpukhov branch of the Academy of the Strategic Missile Forces. Conducting such developments is at least not within the competence of the military educational institutions of the Ministry of Defense of Russia, ”the Ministry of Defense said in a statement.

“There is a misinterpretation of the words of the teacher of this military high school about the hypothetical possibilities of using his own theoretical developments in the field of engine building for defense needs”,
added to the department.
Photos used:
ITAR-TASS / Dmitry Rogulin
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. DIVAN SOLDIER
    DIVAN SOLDIER 15 July 2016 13: 04
    -6
    Which space ?? First, you need to bring to mind the fifth generation fighter ..
    1. Lt. Air Force stock
      Lt. Air Force stock 15 July 2016 13: 10
      +15
      Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
      Which space ??

      So what was going on about the bomber ... What can’t you develop a bomber until the 5th generation fighter is ready?
      1. DIVAN SOLDIER
        DIVAN SOLDIER 15 July 2016 13: 14
        +2
        The fact of the matter is that a bomber is more complicated than a fighter, and even more so a space bomber ...
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 15 July 2016 14: 10
          +2
          Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
          The fact of the matter is that a bomber is more complicated than a fighter, and even more so a space bomber ...

          I can’t understand why you are being mined request
          1. Riv
            Riv 15 July 2016 14: 15
            +5
            Hamsters really wanted to fly on a space bomber. Well, there is the breath of Darth Vader and all that ... :)
            1. Maxom75
              Maxom75 15 July 2016 14: 36
              0
              We have already developed a version of a space bomber and it was called "Buran". If they can create a reduced version of it, and even with an air start, then what's wrong? Here, of course, you will need to carry a couple of wagons on a trailer to carry fuel)) But something our people said about a nuclear engine, maybe we are talking about it?
              1. Riv
                Riv 15 July 2016 16: 08
                +2
                Here, as in the sight of the Egyptian pyramids, two questions: how? and nah ... why?

                The same space bomber - well, why is it? The same missiles can be put into orbit in advance at least a thousand pieces and hung for a hundred years at the Lagrange point, or in a geostationary orbit.
          2. satelit24
            satelit24 15 July 2016 14: 31
            0
            we do not according to concepts, but according to lol
          3. iliitchitch
            iliitchitch 15 July 2016 17: 15
            +4
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            I can’t understand why you are being mined


            I have long noticed - if 2-3 are available, then it started, herd instinct. So to speak, people in a hurry not to fall out of the stream. hi
          4. Forest
            Forest 15 July 2016 18: 04
            0
            That the article is not fully read. Even the name is not complete.
          5. Ze Kot
            Ze Kot 15 July 2016 22: 26
            -1
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            I can’t understand why you are being mined



            There are a few people here who will pass all.
      2. Blondy
        Blondy 15 July 2016 13: 37
        +6
        Everything is as old as the world - an enthusiastic colonel told about the prospective prospects of his developments, and the journalists distorted him as best they could, to the best of their intellectual abilities
        1. Dormidont2
          Dormidont2 15 July 2016 14: 00
          0
          I already thought. that Russia will be the first to create a civilian hyperplane for near space, apparently for a long time it will have to fly on subsonic Boeing
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. the villain
          the villain 15 July 2016 23: 28
          +2
          Quote: Blondy
          Everything is as old as the world - an enthusiastic colonel told about the prospective prospects of his developments, and the journalists distorted him as best they could, to the best of their intellectual abilities

          That's only recently with the intelligence of many journalists not so ... Shook in the pursuit of sensations ...
      3. Alexey-74
        Alexey-74 15 July 2016 14: 38
        +2
        I think there is no smoke without fire, development is unequivocal .... only who admits this .... No.
      4. Simple
        Simple 15 July 2016 15: 29
        0
        Quote: Lt. air force reserve
        .. That it is impossible to develop a bomber until the 5 generation fighter is ready?

        possible, possible.
        You can’t be foolish to lieutenant colonel, a teacher at a branch of the Military Academy of Strategic Missile Forces (Strategic Missile Forces)
        "We are attracting TsAGI (Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute), because they will have to help with the glider, now we will determine the characteristics of the aircraft. I think that the starting mass will be tons 20-25, so that it is shock. fool It is planned that there will be hypersonic missile mode, " - said Solodovnikov (lieutenant colonel, lecturer of the branch of the Military Academy of Strategic Missile Forces (Strategic Missile Forces)
        //ria.ru/defense_safety/20160713/1465167464.html
        "Now we want first discuss the nuances about a year our work will pass, and we will make a scheme, maybe it will be completely different. When we decide on the scheme, we will do the engine itself. In the second year, that is, in 2018, we will start making iron already. Maybe I'm in a hurry, and some questions will arise, but by 2020 the "piece of hardware" should be working "- said Solodovnikov.
        belay
        RIA Novosti //ria.ru/defense_safety/20160713/1465183760.html#ixzz4EJyIVyVF
        forgive me ... but with this "Strategic Missile Forces Lieutenant Colonel" pooping next to it is dangerous ...

        Associate Professor of Journalism of Moscow State University: "This year we recruited aliens"
        https://topwar.ru/97957-docent-zhurfaka-mgu-v-etom-godu-my-nabrali-inoplanetyan.

        html
        in my opinion, not only this year, and not only at Moscow State University, and not at the journalism department ..

        and these nonsense can not be repeated / relay to people underdeveloped mentally
        1. slipped
          slipped 15 July 2016 19: 10
          0
          And where is the nonsense? He said everything correctly). So that's all). To draw it is not to build.
    2. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 15 July 2016 13: 13
      +3
      Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
      Which space ?? First, you need to bring to mind the fifth generation fighter ..
      The elderberry garden, and the uncle in Kiev. Your statement sounds something like this.
    3. Jack-b
      Jack-b 15 July 2016 13: 23
      +2
      Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
      First, you need to bring to mind the fifth generation fighter ..

      And they would have brought some more comrades to the fighter, otherwise they cannot reach it.
    4. Kimimilk
      Kimimilk 15 July 2016 14: 02
      0
      I would say it is necessary to return to the development of ekranoplans
      1. Riv
        Riv 15 July 2016 14: 16
        +1
        Do you know, comrade, that there are much more planes in the sea than there are ships in the sky?
    5. Pavel1
      Pavel1 15 July 2016 14: 39
      +1
      Defense Ministry denies media reports about the creation of a "space bomber" in Russia


      laughing laughing laughing Yeah
      can flog this zhurnalyugu, which first stammered?
      1. Berg berg
        Berg berg 15 July 2016 16: 37
        +1
        Soon someone’s heads will fly that prematurely leaked this secret Old!
      2. Manul
        Manul 15 July 2016 18: 54
        0
        Quote: Paul1
        Yeah
        can flog this zhurnalyugu, which first stammered?

        And at the same time, our frenzied archipatriots, who make minuses as soon as you cast doubt on such stuffing.
    6. Ride78
      Ride78 15 July 2016 23: 02
      0
      It is interesting to remember the urapatriots as bonnets thrown into the air in that post?)))
      Right now, they will also broadcast with innocent eyes - and no one said anything like that))
  2. stas
    stas 15 July 2016 13: 05
    +5
    Authors of false articles should be deprived of the right to post information for 1 year.
    1. Jack-b
      Jack-b 15 July 2016 13: 25
      +2
      That's right, and then state secrets are squandered, the Ministry of Defense then does not know how to pay off the wave.
      1. gray smeet
        gray smeet 15 July 2016 13: 34
        +1
        It was a normal disinformation, ala "Star Wars" - the answer means, Reagan .. laughing
    2. Manul
      Manul 15 July 2016 18: 57
      0
      Quote: stas
      Authors of false articles should be deprived of the right to post information for 1 year.

      And the article, as such, may not exist. Someone prepared a stuffing (because it seems to him that it is patriotic, or the trolls from the censor - neigh, as we are being led to such nonsense), made a link to any media resource and posted it with us. And the "duck" rushed over the bumps.
  3. Ased
    Ased 15 July 2016 13: 06
    +11
    I would, in their place, also refuted ...
    1. Sirocco
      Sirocco 15 July 2016 13: 20
      +4
      Quote: ASed
      I would, in their place, also refuted ...

      Why are we making noise?
      The other day, the article was just about IT.
      https://topwar.ru/98014-neskolko-sovetov-neuemnym-v-svoem-voenno-tehnicheskom-ly

      ubopytstve-chitatelyam.html
      I will say the words of a movie hero Whether they are making a space bomber or not, we will not know this information until a certain moment.))) Otherwise, what a surprise it is for our inveterate "partners".
      1. Ased
        Ased 15 July 2016 13: 24
        +1
        We need to launch a dozen, place, and then quietly tell. After the fact. And then not everyone ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. Ased
        Ased 15 July 2016 13: 34
        0
        Sirocco, I read it - I do not like such articles.
        Felts come true, felts fiction, but there is noise.
        1. Sirocco
          Sirocco 15 July 2016 13: 57
          +3
          Quote: ASed
          Felts come true, felts fiction, but there is noise.

          What specifically did you dislike about the article? There is such a thing as Gostayna, that's all. For clarity, I can ask you about your family budget, how much you get, what is your spouse's salary, then does your house have a weapon, how about an alarm, and so on. You want to know the same thing. By God, like little children, but in the state we are children, and the president of which we have elected is our "Dad" laughing Now another question, do you have secrets from children?)))) I have. And until a certain point they are not known to them.
          1. Ased
            Ased 15 July 2016 14: 06
            +1
            Sirocco. Yes, y my income is 100,000. But it is not exactly. And I have a weapon. Or maybe not. And you guessed the marital status. Not exactly...

            Well, where is the meaning of my post (that article)?
            There is more that I officially refute it! :)))
            1. Sirocco
              Sirocco 15 July 2016 14: 35
              +1
              Quote: ASed
              And I have a weapon. Or maybe not.

              You can more specifically about the weapon, is it there or not, and what caliber? What about the alarm? Is there a house or apartment in private offices? Let's all, and that everyone would know)))))
  4. Atlant-1164
    Atlant-1164 15 July 2016 13: 06
    +2
    any media from an elephant’s fly will quickly go blind. Just give a reason. rating and nothing personal.
  5. guzik007
    guzik007 15 July 2016 13: 07
    +1
    What I spoke yesterday about ...
    ... And the regiment will go with the rank of captain, following the Geleks, to master Siberia, and shorten the language.: =)))
  6. g1v2
    g1v2 15 July 2016 13: 07
    +2
    What a two-medium bomber - we don’t know anything. lol And now think - whether there was a stuffing, or a leak, or a subtle hint of thick circumstances.
    1. Lt. Air Force stock
      Lt. Air Force stock 15 July 2016 13: 14
      0
      Quote: g1v2
      And now think - whether there was a stuffing, or a leak, or a subtle hint of thick circumstances.

      Americans are confused and untwisted for money.
    2. sanja.grw
      sanja.grw 15 July 2016 13: 15
      0
      Along the way, someone blundered too much, and the magazines also beautifully decorated
      1. Sirocco
        Sirocco 15 July 2016 14: 05
        +1
        Quote: sanja.grw
        Along the way, someone blundered too much, and the magazines also beautifully decorated

        Everything seems to be a hint of fat circumstances.
        As in the case of "Status" Maybe our inveterate friends will sober up.
        Russian bloggers saw in the news coverage of Channel One and NTV footage showing a secret development of the Russian defense industry - the nuclear torpedo "Status-6".
        The stories told about the meeting on the development of the Russian armed forces, which was held on November 9, 2015 in Sochi by Russian President Vladimir Putin.
        In one of the frames, a document is shown in close-up, which shows a diagram of a torpedo, two submarines, which, obviously, can become carriers of weapons, explanatory text and other information.
  7. avva2012
    avva2012 15 July 2016 13: 15
    +7
    “There is a misinterpretation of the words of the teacher of this military university about the hypothetical possibilities of using his own theoretical achievements in the field of engine building for defense needs”

    I have a feeling that our media got the task to troll the media of USE and other Western partners. Naturally, the specialists in these countries are well aware of what the Russians can and what not yet. But their population does not know. And against the background of the "Russian threat", there are reports that in Russia missiles on a nuclear reactor will soon appear, that we will soon create flocks of 6th generation aircraft, that unmanned super-high-speed submarines lie at the bottom and wait in the wings. wassat
    In short, they turn a Western man into a neurotic, which is good, because fear and confusion in the camp of a potential partner are always good. What have we not started it. Well done, learn fast.
    1. Camel
      Camel 15 July 2016 19: 14
      0
      avva2012
      In short, they turn a Western man into a neurotic, which is good, because fear and confusion in the camp of a potential partner are always good.

      Not very good, because fear and confusion not only bring panic in the camp of the enemy, but also consolidate society in the face of the enemy. What do we need? So that US citizens, as in the years of WWII, diligently worked at enterprises with the slogan "Everything to defeat fascism" or a disunited society of consumers who, lazily chewing gum, pull: - "Why do I need this ..."?
      The decomposition of US society is progressing and let's not interfere with it (and unnecessarily frighten). Then it will be easier for us.
      1. avva2012
        avva2012 15 July 2016 20: 28
        +1
        Quote: Camel The decomposition of US society is progressing and let's not interfere with it (and frighten too much). Then it will be easier for us.

        The decomposition of society, if it exists, occurs in a slightly different era than it was in WWII. The level of impact on human consciousness, the information load on both a single individual and society as a whole has increased many times. It’s not a sin to take advantage of this.
        During the Cold War, Soviet propaganda, in response to slander and misinformation about the life of Soviet society, tried to answer symmetrically, "but in America they beat blacks." Now, in my opinion, the answer should be asymmetrical. To the mossy cliché, "The Russians are coming!", You can answer, "Yes," but not directly, but through the tendency of any person to nurture and cherish their fears. The crowd believes in what it has invented itself (or what its own propaganda has put into its head). This fear is not productive, because it is initially far-fetched. Therefore, "everything for the front, everything for victory" will not work. IMHO.
  8. NordUral
    NordUral 15 July 2016 13: 15
    +1
    The chatterbox is a godsend for a spy.
  9. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 15 July 2016 13: 17
    +1
    Well, yes, yes, and you striped partners, be afraid. Russia, she is. And her answers are "asymmetric". Your tolerant ass will not like it wassat When was the Spiral space fighter tested? A quarter of a century ago. Electronics has become lighter and much more productive, New materials have appeared and the technology of working with them has been mastered ... Well, they were able to set the task correctly, they also managed to do it. Leak, not leak - let the CIA now guess. On a camomile.
  10. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 15 July 2016 13: 18
    0
    Trolled, threw information "by chance", now denied, added mystery laughing Let them think what they want!
    1. stas
      stas 15 July 2016 13: 22
      0
      There is nothing mysterious, not only we are engaged in such developments, and there is a good Lozin-Lozinsky project.
  11. iwind
    iwind 15 July 2016 13: 25
    +9
    How such news is written. I was more surprised that someone took this seriously.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Dormidont2
      Dormidont2 15 July 2016 14: 06
      +1
      if not for this news http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/3450192 I would not have believed it either
      1. iwind
        iwind 15 July 2016 17: 33
        +1
        Quote: Dormidont2
        if not for this news http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/3450192 I would not have believed it either

        Even so. Such an engine does not solve the insidious problems of air launch. I recommend reading it.
        http://lozga.livejournal.com/73437.html
        http://lozga.livejournal.com/114394.html
        An ICBM or a drone in orbit to solve those problems is cheaper and more reliable.
    4. The comment was deleted.
  12. xant
    xant 15 July 2016 13: 26
    -1
    HERE DO NOT BELIEVE! and that’s it.
    1. Mikhail Krapivin
      Mikhail Krapivin 15 July 2016 13: 39
      +1
      And it is necessary! Forgot classic? You just have to believe in Russia!
      1. xant
        xant 15 July 2016 13: 48
        0
        I will rephrase: I do not want to believe that all the journalists misinterpreted it.
      2. Manul
        Manul 15 July 2016 19: 07
        0
        Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
        And it is necessary! Forgot classic? You just have to believe in Russia!

        Do not forget. Just one line can be quoted and more precisely. wink Shame on you, comrade. And we complain about the exam. Of the four words - two confused ..
  13. nik-karata
    nik-karata 15 July 2016 13: 26
    0
    If this teacher of a military university has too long a language, then "in the depths of Siberian ores" he will quickly get hooked. And if at all ... then who knows ... winked
  14. pavelty
    pavelty 15 July 2016 13: 27
    0
    Madhouse, someone blurted out something, and people have been shouting for a week that we will all win from outer space)) Washington must be destroyed)
  15. x.andvlad
    x.andvlad 15 July 2016 13: 33
    0
    Yes, these eloquent storytellers are already tired of journalists - humanitarians. If only to give birth to a sensation, and there at least the grass does not grow. And how much more such "rubbish" from the media is lying around! Just have time to filter.
  16. Enoch
    Enoch 15 July 2016 13: 36
    0
    What is it called Buran? It's time to update and start again - scare, so scare.
    1. Cananecat
      Cananecat 15 July 2016 14: 23
      0
      drop it gently on the lawn in front of the White House ... but why aren’t we to blame .... he’s old, he’s gone out of orbit ...)))
  17. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 15 July 2016 13: 42
    0
    There is an incorrect interpretation of the words of the teacher of this military university
    Don’t be nervous, a certain teacher was going to retire, why and to whom he said - we’ll leave it behind the scenes, but I understand the reaction of the media, including Western ones and the hysteria of the staff. The loot should not be reported to the budget, but to them. I think so...
  18. Naval
    Naval 15 July 2016 13: 42
    0
    I remember that about underwater drones the same leak, as it were, "accidentally" occurred, and even at a meeting with the Supreme. wassat
  19. red joni
    red joni 15 July 2016 13: 43
    -1
    what’s next, the Russian special forces on the moon to prepare for battles with the Yankees in space using laser guns with the power of a nuclear bomb, so he believed in a space bomber.
  20. grandfather Mih
    grandfather Mih 15 July 2016 13: 52
    0
    Hypothetical possibilities of use ... It will be necessary, hypothetical will become a reality).
  21. Holsten
    Holsten 15 July 2016 14: 00
    0
    The main thing is that the wave was launched. And now let the "hearty friends and partners" scratch their turnips until they are exhausted.
  22. BOB044
    BOB044 15 July 2016 14: 01
    0
    Not everything is being developed in the defense industry. It should be discussed in the media. We will find out how the product appears.
  23. FID
    FID 15 July 2016 14: 21
    0
    And the techie in the picture, in the NK-32 is ...
  24. satelit24
    satelit24 15 July 2016 14: 25
    0
    The Buran spacecraft was developed as a boomber, and the Spiral Aerospace System as a fighter, and most importantly, everything flew and worked!
    1. Baby doll
      Baby doll 15 July 2016 14: 53
      0
      Quote: satelit24
      the main thing everything flew and worked!

      Could you, please, share the information that flew to the AKS "Spiral"?
      1. Banishing liberoids
        Banishing liberoids 15 July 2016 15: 10
        0
        Pupsen - in the "spiral" project, the reusable spacecraft itself passed flight tests, which was called "lopotok" because it was really a trip to paw. It was launched from a carrier aircraft, whose foot was suspended under the fuselage.
        1. Baby doll
          Baby doll 15 July 2016 15: 20
          0
          Your information about Project Spiral is not entirely accurate. Firstly, there was no standard aerospace plane; there was a flying atmospheric analogue. Secondly, there was no booster plane. Thirdly, from the carrier aircraft, which was used as the Tu-95, they did not launch, but dropped it for testing various tasks, namely the atmospheric analogue. So there was actually no AKC "Spiral", there were separate developments on this topic.
      2. satelit24
        satelit24 15 July 2016 15: 31
        0
        the spiral itself
  25. kig
    kig 15 July 2016 14: 28
    0
    About the space bomber misunderstood, it will not. There will be a space fighter.
  26. Evil 55
    Evil 55 15 July 2016 14: 31
    0
    Let all sorts of blasphemers and horrors be afraid of us ...
  27. Mercenary
    Mercenary 15 July 2016 14: 36
    0
    In vain, it is necessary on the contrary to advertise (as the SOI states) let them fear the adversaries! laughing
  28. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 15 July 2016 15: 12
    +1
    This plane was actually built, but ... after reading our reviews on the website, the management decided to close the project until we give the go-ahead! wassat
  29. potapych
    potapych 15 July 2016 15: 42
    0
    and correctly refuted, it already exists and is being issued at the Ulyanovsk airline. I will not take pictures, as there is a new system of invisibility.
  30. sergeyzzz
    sergeyzzz 15 July 2016 16: 05
    +2
    In vain they refuted this info, it was necessary to turn it steeper - that a new intergalactic cruiser had been laid in the suburbs of Moscow and that some factory should be fenced with barbed wire, let the spies go crazy with the desire to get there.
  31. RUS69
    RUS69 15 July 2016 16: 14
    +2
    The news "Russia is developing a nuclear space bomber" right there in the news D. Keri comes across GDP, the next day "Russia is not developing a bomber."
    So shuganuli for fidelity and good laughing
  32. zulus222
    zulus222 15 July 2016 16: 41
    +1
    in the western district, two tractors worked peacefully on the field, learning that NATO was deploying missile defense, tractor drivers fired five cruise missiles each. and hid in the atmosphere. in the event NATO continues to move east, harvesters will enter the field!)))
    1. the villain
      the villain 15 July 2016 23: 37
      0
      Quote: zulus222
      in the western district two tractors peacefully worked on the field

      Oh, and the good song was:
      And then, draining the gas and starting the reactor,
      And quickly smelling buckwheat and oats
      Our Soviet peace tractor rose into the sky
      And flew into our peaceful Soviet collective farm ... lol
  33. Khariton
    Khariton 15 July 2016 17: 24
    0
    All nonsense ... There is nothing in Russia and no development is underway! One blurted out in interest and away we go! bully Calm down gentlemen in NATO ... We are bastard Russia, we sell gas oil and all. Well, sometimes we can scare us, beat our faces in Milan and that’s it!
  34. slipped
    slipped 15 July 2016 19: 15
    +2
    Everything new is "well hidden old")
    1. Tektor
      Tektor 21 July 2016 14: 13
      0
      It may be so, but there is another option: MAX. The problem is the lack of An-225. The problem can be circumvented if the space bomber takes off separately using additional turbojet engines, which can be installed, for example, as in the Be-200 with movable protective heat shields and brake reverse for landing or going out of orbit. And the outboard tank with rocket fuel will be raised separately on the same Ruslan. Well, it’s clear that in flight the bomber fits into the tank, possibly a little smaller and less weight due to a modern, more efficient fuel. Then Ruslan makes a slide and at the moment of zero gravity there is a undocking and separation of the tank with a rocket plane, which turns on its rocket engine and goes into orbit.
  35. -СтрР° РЅРЅРёРє-
    0
    And it's a pity that the stuffing-in - I wanted a "fairy tale-reality" so much, for some sworn friends it would be a "terrible fairy tale" ...
  36. Skifotavr
    Skifotavr 15 July 2016 22: 06
    0
    Journalists can ...
  37. Ze Kot
    Ze Kot 15 July 2016 22: 27
    +1
    Why refute? If you chatted, then draw conclusions and do it faster. If you do not understand, then do not refute. Let the Americans twitch.